DOCSLIB.ORG

2019 IFBB World Fitness Championships

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
2019 IFBB World Fitness Championships International Federation of Bodybuilding and Fitness IFBB World Fitness Championships 30 November - 1 December 2019, Bratislava, Slovakia O F F I C I A L C O N T E S T R E S U L T S Women's Bodyfitness up to 158 cm PLACE No NAME COUNTRY BORN BW/ BH RD1 RD2 RD3 RD4 Score 1 1 Senni Nieminen Finland 1996 /152 9 5 0 0 5 2 4 Olga Lutsenko Russia 1991 /154.4 7 11 0 0 11 3 13 Karina Shcherbak Russia 1986 /155 14 17 0 0 17 4 9 Nadiia Stoliarova Ukraine 1985 /155.3 20 20 0 0 20 5 3 Filipa Santos Portugal 1992 /158 27 24 0 0 24 6 12 Xiang Zai Hua China 1981 /157.2 32 30 0 0 30 7 6 Susanna Koivisto Finland 1978 /155 32 0 0 0 0 8 7 Men Gru Xie China 1987 /154.3 41 0 0 0 0 9 8 Andrea Jancikova Czech Republic 1975 /157.5 51 0 0 0 0 10 2 Olha Hryhoruk Ukraine 1989 /157 52 0 0 0 0 11 11 Aimee Hansen Denmark 1986 /157.8 53 0 0 0 0 12 5 Vanja Paladin Croatia /150.4 54 0 0 0 0 13 10 Marcela Vesela Czech Republic 1991 /157.3 62 0 0 0 0 Σ=13 Women's Bodyfitness up to 163 cm PLACE No NAME COUNTRY BORN BW/ BH RD1 RD2 RD3 RD4 Score 1 28 Tatiana Mandolina Russia 1986 /162 5 5 0 0 5 2 18 Petra Lacinova Czech Republic 1987 /162.3 11 13 0 0 13 3 27 Liis Org Estonia 1990 /160.8 15 18 0 0 18 4 19 Elina Niemela Finland 1990 /160.5 19 18 0 0 18 5 25 Juliana Maksiova Slovakia 1993 /159.4 34 27 0 0 27 6 34 Huang Yu Ying China 1972 /162.8 26 27 0 0 27 7 22 Yan Feng Zhou China 1987 /162 37 0 0 0 0 8 24 Katarzyna Jankowiak Poland 1985 /161 40 0 0 0 0 9 32 Elena Masarykova Slovakia 1983 /161.3 41 0 0 0 0 10 26 Kaori Sakamori Japan 1970 /161.8 48 0 0 0 0 16 Alla Savchenko Ukraine 1984 /163 17 Shu Xian Zhou China 1977 /161 20 Kristina Boldyreva Russia 1983 /161 21 Su Juan Luo China 1976 /161.3 23 Anita Blazevic Croatia 1992 /161.5 29 Meng Zhu Cao China 1989 /163 30 Hanne Holst Norway 1989 /159.6 31 Jia Tang China 1986 /161 33 Natallia Vitsiuk Belarus 1982 /160.7 Σ=19 1/11 Women's Bodyfitness up to 168 cm PLACE No NAME COUNTRY BORN BW/ BH RD1 RD2 RD3 RD4 Score 1 43 Alla Matsegora Ukraine 1982 /166.3 8 7 0 0 7 2 42 Iuliia Kazakovtceva Russia 1988 /165.3 11 9 0 0 9 3 37 Olha Shnurova Ukraine 1981 /166 11 16 0 0 16 4 38 Viera Bozikova Slovakia 1998 /166 23 22 0 0 22 5 39 Natalia Skulkina Russia 1985 /164.8 27 24 0 0 24 6 40 Kirsi Pelamo Finland 1980 /166.5 29 25 0 0 25 7 41 Agata Hlavackova Slovakia 1993 /164 33 0 0 0 0 8 46 Hanna Saario Finland 1981 /166.3 36 0 0 0 0 9 36 Bangsil Chong South Korea 1976 /166.8 46 0 0 0 0 10 44 Elvira Kokoeva Russia 1985 /164.6 51 0 0 0 0 11 45 Stanislava Volekova Slovakia 1985 /165 56 0 0 0 0 12 47 Kun Peng Yan China 1977 /164.8 59 0 0 0 0 13 48 Katarína Rigoova Hungary 1983 /164.5 64 0 0 0 0 Σ=13 Women's Bodyfitness over 168 cm PLACE No NAME COUNTRY BORN BW/ BH RD1 RD2 RD3 RD4 Score 1 60 Yuliia Shykula Ukraine 1986 /171.8 11 8 0 0 8 2 54 Alina Yaman Ukraine 1985 /170.9 8 10 0 0 10 3 53 Vera Koroleva Russia 1991 /180.4 12 12 0 0 12 4 58 Jaana Karevuo Finland 1990 /168.5 19 21 0 0 21 5 51 Choi Seo Young South Korea 1980 /172.1 29 25 0 0 25 6 52 Bettina Sorensen Denmark 1986 /176.8 27 28 0 0 28 7 62 Laima Pletinskaja Lithuania 1985 /169 37 0 0 0 0 8 57 Natalia Paprocka Slovakia 2001 /168.2 37 0 0 0 0 9 55 Marina Danei Argentina 1986 /168.4 46 0 0 0 0 10 59 Eva Synkova Czech Republic 1988 /171 53 0 0 0 0 11 61 Mehtap Esraf Turkey 1982 /173.6 53 0 0 0 0 12 56 Li Ma China 1983 /171.8 54 0 0 0 0 Σ=12 Women's Bodyfitness OVERALL PLACE No NAME COUNTRY BORN BW/ BH RD1 RD2 RD3 RD4 Score 1 1 Senni Nieminen Finland 1996 /152 11 0 0 0 11 2 28 Tatiana Mandolina Russia 1986 /162 11 0 0 0 11 3 43 Alla Matsegora Ukraine 1982 /166.3 14 0 0 0 14 4 60 Yuliia Shykula Ukraine 1986 /171.8 15 0 0 0 15 Σ=4 Women's Physique up to 163 cm RD2x PLACE BORN BW/ BH RD1 RD3 RD4 Score No NAME COUNTRY 2 1 124 Natalia Bystrova Russia 1968 /152 6 12 6 0 18 2 126 Elena Lazareva Russia 1968 /159.3 10 20 10 0 30 3 122 Megumi Sawada Japan 1961 /161.5 15 40 20 0 60 4 125 Maryna Melchenko Ukraine 1979 /157.2 28 42 20 0 62 5 120 Sunyun Park South Korea 1971 /158.5 18 44 23 0 67 6 121 Olesia Kachur Russia 1980 /161.7 32 48 27 0 75 7 123 Satu Javarus Finland 1989 /153.8 32 0 0 0 0 8 127 Mina Mahzoon Sweden 1991 /157 40 0 0 0 0 Σ=8 2/11 Women's Physique over 163 cm RD2x PLACE BORN BW/ BH RD1 RD3 RD4 Score No NAME COUNTRY 2 1 137 Viktoriia Pohribniak Ukraine 1988 /168.8 5 10 5 0 15 2 136 Liubov Popova Ukraine 1988 /166 12 30 10 0 40 3 130 Nataliia Prokhorova Ukraine 1971 /169.5 15 30 19 0 49 4 134 Tatiana Bulut Turkey 1974 /173.6 17 36 21 0 57 5 133 Carla Marquardt Germany 1980 /166.4 27 42 20 0 62 6 131 Sachiko Takahara Japan 1967 /167.5 28 54 29 0 83 7 135 Franziska Donath Germany 1979 /164 35 0 0 0 0 8 132 Adele Jacobs South Africa 1985 /164 40 0 0 0 0 Σ=8 Women's Physique OVERALL PLACE No NAME COUNTRY BORN BW/ BH RD1 RD2 RD3 RD4 Score 1 124 Natalia Bystrova Russia 1968 /152 7 0 0 0 7 2 137 Viktoriia Pohribniak Ukraine 1988 /168.8 8 0 0 0 8 Σ=2 Women's Wellness Fitness up to 158 cm PLACE No NAME COUNTRY BORN BW/ BH RD1 RD2 RD3 RD4 Score 1 144 Dagmara Dominiczak Poland 1987 /156.5 6 7 0 0 7 2 147 Lisa Meiswinkel Germany 1995 /154.5 12 11 0 0 11 3 146 Caroline Aspenskog Sweden 1990 /156.5 13 13 0 0 13 4 145 Jana Zitna Czech Republic 1979 /158 24 22 0 0 22 5 141 Demi Kriel South Africa 1993 /157.4 21 23 0 0 23 6 148 Zhou Ya Xian China 1991 /154.3 30 30 0 0 30 7 142 Henna Poyhonen Finland 1996 /157.8 37 0 0 0 0 8 140 Mania De Smet Belgium 1995 /152.5 38 0 0 0 0 9 143 Dilan Coskun Turkey 1991 /147.2 45 0 0 0 0 DNC 149 Gilliane Bance France 1988 /154.4 Σ=10 Women's Wellness Fitness up to 163 cm PLACE No NAME COUNTRY BORN BW/ BH RD1 RD2 RD3 RD4 Score 1 154 Nikoletta Sularz Poland 1996 /160 7 0 0 0 7 2 153 Michaela Nemcova Slovakia 1992 /159 13 0 0 0 13 3 152 Anne-Cathrine Westby Norway 1990 /159 17 0 0 0 17 4 157 Daria Kapitova Russia 1987 /161.2 18 0 0 0 18 5 151 Ruzaliia Boichenko Ukraine 1991 /160 25 0 0 0 25 6 156 Petra Jaskova Slovakia 1994 /160 29 0 0 0 29 7 155 Nikola Keprtova Czech Republic 1994 /163 31 0 0 0 31 Σ=7 3/11 Women's Wellness Fitness up to 168 cm PLACE No NAME COUNTRY BORN BW/ BH RD1 RD2 RD3 RD4 Score 1 168 Maria Gongora Spain 1986 /165 7 6 0 0 6 2 163 Micaela Di Gennaro Italy 1993 /165 8 9 0 0 9 3 166 Kateryna Cherniei Ukraine 1987 /166 16 17 0 0 17 4 161 Elena Kapitonova Russia 1988 /166.2 17 17 0 0 17 5 167 Viktoriia Shcherbakova Ukraine 1986 /166.2 25 26 0 0 26 6 162 Goknur Sendur Turkey 1995 /163.5 34 28 0 0 28 7 160 Emma Jarvela Finland 1996 /165.8 36 0 0 0 0 8 165 Kristina Kasparova Russia 1990 /163.3 38 0 0 0 0 9 164 Pan Pan Lu China 1989 /165 41 0 0 0 0 Σ=9 Women's Wellness Fitness over 168 cm PLACE No NAME COUNTRY BORN BW/ BH RD1 RD2 RD3 RD4 Score 1 172 Lara Santini Croatia 1997 /168.2 5 5 0 0 5 2 176 Kateryna Prokopieva Ukraine 1999 /168.5 12 10 0 0 10 3 174 Olga Kulinych Ukraine 1979 /168.2 13 15 0 0 15 4 173 Lilian Rannu Estonia 1981 /168.4 24 20 0 0 20 5 177 Tatiana Eremina Russia 1980 /172.5 23 25 0 0 25 6 171 Miljana Ferenc Serbia 1993 /178 27 29 0 0 29 7 175 Sonja Kustre Croatia 1989 /172.8 37 0 0 0 0 8 178 Zhong Li Wu China 1989 /168.9 38 0 0 0 0 Σ=8 Women's Wellness Fitness OVERALL PLACE No NAME COUNTRY BORN BW/ BH RD1 RD2 RD3 RD4 Score 1 172 Lara Santini Croatia 1997 /168.2 7 0 0 0 7 2 154 Nikoletta Sularz Poland 1996 /160 14 0 0 0 14 3 144 Dagmara Dominiczak Poland 1987 /156.5 15 0 0 0 15 4 168 Maria Gongora Spain 1986 /165 16 0 0 0 16 Σ=4 Women's Fitness up to 160 cm PLACE No NAME COUNTRY BORN BW/ BH RD1 RD2 RD3 RD4 Score 1 77 Tatiana Ondruskova Slovakia 2003 /159 6 14 5 12 17 2 81 Anna Dudushkina Russia 1987 /158.7 24 10 18 7 25 3 70 Dobroslava Lehotska Slovakia 1984 /157 17 23 17 23 40 4 76 Elina Lukashina Russia 1997 /152.4 22 13 25 17 42 5 84 Karina Polovnikova Estonia 1996 /158.8 26 19 27 18 45 6 75 Delia Lacataru Romania 1993 /152.5 23 32 17 28 45 7 79 Lenka Cervena Czech Republic 1985 /155.5 38 37 0 0 0 8 71 Anna Rudnitskaia Russia 1977 /154 36 44 0 0 0 9 68 Jasmin Mantila Finland 1998 /160 35 52 0 0 0 10 67 Margaret Molyneaux United Kingdom 1980 /159.9 58 35 0 0 0 11 69 Ana-Lucia Falconi Ecuador 1988 /158.2 56 51 0 0 0 12 80 Hao Chen Zhang China 1999 /157 51 59 0 0 0 Σ=12 4/11 Women's Fitness up to 163 cm PLACE No NAME COUNTRY BORN BW/ BH RD1 RD2 RD3 RD4 Score 1 65 Michaela Pavleova Slovakia 2001 /161.6 7 12 8 16 24 2 83 Dorottya Agoston Hungary 1997 /162.3 8 24 9 18 27 3 66 Oleksandra Tarasova Ukraine 1991 /160.5 21 10 17 13 30 4 73 Elizaveta Shumilina Russia 1998 /162 27 13 24 8 32 5 74 Chen Shuying China 1995 /160.4 21 19 18 19 37 6 78 QianYu Shi China 1993 /161.4 27 30 30 30 60 7 82 Terry Abraham Canada 1972 /162 29 34 0 0 0 Σ=7 Women's Fitness over 163 cm PLACE No NAME COUNTRY BORN BW/ BH RD1 RD2 RD3 RD4 Score 1 88 Kristina Juricova Slovakia 2000 /170.5 12 18 7 19 26 2 97 Natalya Neustroeva Russia 1984 /163.1 31 12 17 12 29 3 87 Panna Frauenberger Hungary 2001 /169.5 41 15 19 19 38 4 95 Korina Keszei Hungary 2002 /167.4 22 41 11 28 39 5 98 Olga Demchuk Russia 1982 /165.3 54 12 29 12 41 6 92 Endla Vaher Estonia 1991 /168.5 37 18 24 17 41 7 89 Yana Zakharova Russia 1988 /167.8 48 35 0 0 0 8 90 Lucia Zavadzanova Slovakia 2001 /171.4 43 40 0 0 0 9 93 Karolína Holbova Slovakia 2001 /164.4 34 51 0 0 0 10 99 Ana-Marija Zujovic Serbia 1990 /165.6 50 36 0 0 0 11 96 Virag Vago Hungary 2002 /165 40 61 0 0 0 12 91 Diana Wildova Slovakia 2000 /173.4 55 54 0 0 0 13 102 Maryna Honcharenko Ukraine 2002 /168 46 69 0 0 0 14 100 Reene Teder Estonia 2000 /171 42 79 0 0 0 15 94 Elena Krakhmaleva France 1986 /163.4 64 71 0 0 0 16 101 Tatiana Fedorova Russia 1991 /165.5 73 66 0 0 0 Σ=16 Women's Fitness OVERALL PLACE No NAME COUNTRY BORN BW/ BH RD1
Load more

Recommended publications
  • (CEF) 2019 TRANSPORT MAP CALL Proposal for the Selection of Projects
    Connecting Europe Facility (CEF) 2019 TRANSPORT MAP CALL Proposal for the selection of projects July 2020 Innovation and Networks Executive Agency THE PROJECT DESCRIPTIONS IN THIS PUBLICATION ARE AS SUPPLIED BY APPLICANTS IN THE TENTEC PROPOSAL SUBMIS- SION SYSTEM. THE INNOVATION AND NETWORKS EXECUTIVE AGENCY CANNOT BE HELD RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY ISSUE ARISING FROM SAID DESCRIPTIONS. The Innovation and Networks Executive Agency is not liable for any consequence from the reuse of this publication. Brussels, Innovation and Networks Executive Agency (INEA), 2020 © European Union, 2020 Reuse is authorised provided the source is acknowledged. Distorting the original meaning or message of this document is not allowed. The reuse policy of European Commission documents is regulated by Decision 2011/833/EU (OJ L 330, 14.12.2011, p. 39). For any use or reproduction of photos and other material that is not under the copyright of the European Union, permission must be sought directly from the copyright holders. PDF ISBN 978-92-9208-086-0 doi:10.2840/16208 EF-02-20-472-EN-N Page 2 / 168 Table of Contents Commonly used abbreviations ......................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 7 Introduction ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • IGC Plenary 2005
    Agenda of the Annual Meeting of the FAI Gliding Commission To be held in Lausanne, Switzerland on 5th and 6th March 2010 Agenda for the IGC Plenary 2010 Day 1, Friday 5th March 2010 Session: Opening and Reports (Friday 09.15 – 10.45) 1. Opening (Bob Henderson) 1.1 Roll Call (Stéphane Desprez/Peter Eriksen) 1.2 Administrative matters (Peter Eriksen) 1.3 Declaration of Conflicts of Interest 2. Minutes of previous meeting, Lausanne, 6th-7th March 2009 (Peter Eriksen) 3. IGC President’s report (Bob Henderson) 4. FAI Matters (Mr.Stéphane Desprez) 4.1 Update by the Secretary General 5. Finance (Dick Bradley) 5.1 2009 Financial report 5.2 Financial statement and budget 6. Reports not requiring voting 6.1 OSTIV report (Loek Boermans) Please note that reports under Agenda items 6.2, 6.3 and 6.4 are made available on the IGC web-site, and will not necessarily be presented. The Committees and Specialists will be available for questions. 6.2 Standing Committees 6.2.1 Communications and PR Report (Bob Henderson) 6.2.2 Championship Management Committee Report (Eric Mozer) 6.2.3 Sporting Code Committee Report (Ross Macintyre) 6.2.4 Air Traffic, Navigation, Display Systems (ANDS) Report (Bernald Smith) 6.2.5 GNSS Flight Recorder Approval Committee (GFAC) Report (Ian Strachan) 6.2.6 FAI Commission on Airspace and Navigation Systems (CANS) Report (Ian Strachan) Session: Reports from Specialists and Competitions (Friday 11.15 – 12.45) 6.3 Working Groups 6.3.1 Country Development Report (Alexander Georgas) 6.3.2 Grand Prix Action Plan (Bob Henderson) 6.3.3 History Committee (Tor Johannessen) 6.3.4 Scoring Working Group (Visa-Matti Leinikki) 6.4 IGC Specialists 6.4.1 CASI Report (Air Sports Commissions) (Tor Johannessen) 6.4.2 EGU/EASA Report (Patrick Pauwels) 6.4.3 Environmental Commission Report (Bernald Smith) 6.4.4 Membership (John Roake) 6.4.5 On-Line Contest Report (Axel Reich) 6.4.6 Simulated Gliding Report (Roland Stuck) 6.4.7 Trophy Management Report (Marina Vigorita) 6.4.8 Web Management Report (Peter Ryder) 7.
    [Show full text]
  • Rankpro 2019/2020 World Leading Universities TOP 1000 BC-Index Communicability and Information Availability on a University Homepage Rankings by Countries
    www.cicerobook.com RankPro 2019/2020 World leading universities TOP 1000 BC-Index Communicability and information availability on a University homepage Rankings by Countries BC-Index World World University Country normalized rank class to 100 782 Ferhat Abbas Sétif University Algeria 45.16 b 715 University of Buenos Aires Argentina 49.68 b 953 Buenos Aires Institute of Technology (ITBA) Argentina 31.00 no 957 Austral University Argentina 29.38 no 969 Pontifical Catholic University of Argentina Argentina 20.21 no 975-1000 National University of La Plata Argentina 0.00 no 975-1000 Torcuato Di Tella University Argentina 0.00 no 975-1000 University of Belgrano Argentina 0.00 no 975-1000 University of Palermo Argentina 0.00 no 975-1000 University of San Andrés - UdeSA Argentina 0.00 no 812 Yerevan State University Armenia 42.96 b 27 University of Sydney Australia 87.31 a++ 46 Macquarie University Australia 84.66 a++ 56 Australian Catholic University Australia 84.02 a++ 80 University of Melbourne Australia 82.41 a++ 93 University of Wollongong Australia 81.97 a++ 100 University of Newcastle Australia 81.78 a++ 118 University of Queensland Australia 81.11 a++ 121 Monash University Australia 81.05 a++ 128 Flinders University Australia 80.21 a++ 140 La Trobe University Australia 79.42 a+ 140 Western Sydney University Australia 79.42 a+ 149 Curtin University Australia 79.11 a+ 149 UNSW Sydney (The University of New South Wales) Australia 79.01 a+ 173 Swinburne University of Technology Australia 78.03 a+ 191 Charles Darwin University Australia 77.19
    [Show full text]
  • SIF Implementation Specification (Australia) 3.4.8
    SIF Implementation Specification (Australia) 3.4.8 table of contents Systems Interoperability Framework™ SIF Implementation Specification (Australia) 3.4.8 March 18, 2021 This version: http://specification.sifassociation.org/Implementation/AU/3.4.8/index.html Previous version: http://specification.sifassociation.org/Implementation/AU/3.4.7/ Latest version: http://specification.sifassociation.org/Implementation/AU/ Schemas SIF_Message (single file, non-annotated) (ZIP archive) SIF_Message (single file, annotated) (ZIP archive) SIF_Message (includes, non-annotated) (ZIP archive) SIF_Message (includes, annotated) (ZIP archive) DataModel (single file, non-annotated) (ZIP archive) DataModel (single file, annotated) (ZIP archive) DataModel (includes, non-annotated) (ZIP archive) DataModel (includes, annotated) (ZIP archive) Note: SIF_Message schemas define every data object element as optional per SIF's Publish/Subscribe and SIF Request/Response Models; DataModel schemas maintain the cardinality of all data object elements. JSON-PESC XSLT JSON-PESC XSLT 3.4.X support (GitHub Repository) Please refer to the errata for this document, which may include some normative corrections. This document is also available in these non-normative formats: ZIP archive, PDF (for printing as a single file), Excel spreadsheet. Copyright ©2021 Systems Interoperability Framework (SIF™) Association. All Rights Reserved. 1 of 564 16/03/2021, 2:20 pm SIF Implementation Specification (Australia) 3.4.8 2 of 564 16/03/2021, 2:20 pm SIF Implementation Specification (Australia) 3.4.8 1 Preamble 1.1 Abstract 1.1.1 What is SIF? SIF is not a product, but a technical blueprint for enabling diverse applications to interact and share data related to entities in the pK-12 instructional and administrative environment.
    [Show full text]
  • College Codes (Outside the United States)
    COLLEGE CODES (OUTSIDE THE UNITED STATES) ACT CODE COLLEGE NAME COUNTRY 7143 ARGENTINA UNIV OF MANAGEMENT ARGENTINA 7139 NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF ENTRE RIOS ARGENTINA 6694 NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF TUCUMAN ARGENTINA 7205 TECHNICAL INST OF BUENOS AIRES ARGENTINA 6673 UNIVERSIDAD DE BELGRANO ARGENTINA 6000 BALLARAT COLLEGE OF ADVANCED EDUCATION AUSTRALIA 7271 BOND UNIVERSITY AUSTRALIA 7122 CENTRAL QUEENSLAND UNIVERSITY AUSTRALIA 7334 CHARLES STURT UNIVERSITY AUSTRALIA 6610 CURTIN UNIVERSITY EXCHANGE PROG AUSTRALIA 6600 CURTIN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY AUSTRALIA 7038 DEAKIN UNIVERSITY AUSTRALIA 6863 EDITH COWAN UNIVERSITY AUSTRALIA 7090 GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY AUSTRALIA 6901 LA TROBE UNIVERSITY AUSTRALIA 6001 MACQUARIE UNIVERSITY AUSTRALIA 6497 MELBOURNE COLLEGE OF ADV EDUCATION AUSTRALIA 6832 MONASH UNIVERSITY AUSTRALIA 7281 PERTH INST OF BUSINESS & TECH AUSTRALIA 6002 QUEENSLAND INSTITUTE OF TECH AUSTRALIA 6341 ROYAL MELBOURNE INST TECH EXCHANGE PROG AUSTRALIA 6537 ROYAL MELBOURNE INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY AUSTRALIA 6671 SWINBURNE INSTITUTE OF TECH AUSTRALIA 7296 THE UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE AUSTRALIA 7317 UNIV OF MELBOURNE EXCHANGE PROGRAM AUSTRALIA 7287 UNIV OF NEW SO WALES EXCHG PROG AUSTRALIA 6737 UNIV OF QUEENSLAND EXCHANGE PROGRAM AUSTRALIA 6756 UNIV OF SYDNEY EXCHANGE PROGRAM AUSTRALIA 7289 UNIV OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA EXCHG PRO AUSTRALIA 7332 UNIVERSITY OF ADELAIDE AUSTRALIA 7142 UNIVERSITY OF CANBERRA AUSTRALIA 7027 UNIVERSITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES AUSTRALIA 7276 UNIVERSITY OF NEWCASTLE AUSTRALIA 6331 UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND AUSTRALIA 7265 UNIVERSITY
    [Show full text]
  • Structural Separation in Regulated Industries: 2016 Report
    Structural separation in regulated industries Report on implementing the OECD Recommendation 2016 Structural separation in regulated industries Report on implementing the OECD Recommendation 2016 This work is published under the responsibility of the Secretary-General of the OECD. The opinions expressed and arguments employed herein do not necessarily reflect the official views of the OECD or of the governments of its member countries or those of the European Union. This document and any map included herein are without prejudice to the status or sovereignty over any territory, to the delimitation of international frontiers and boundaries and to the name of any territory, city, or area. Please cite this publication as: OECD (2016), Structural separation in regulated industries: Report on implementing the OECD Recommendation © OECD 2016 3 Foreword On 26 April 2001, the OECD Council adopted a Recommendation Concerning Structural Separation in Regulated Industries suggesting to OECD countries that when regulated firms have activities that are potentially competitive and linked to non-competitive activities, such as natural monopoly activities, governments should consider the benefits and costs of structural measures separating two activities. The Recommendation was accompanied by a detailed report, and both advocated careful consideration of the potential pros and cons of structural separation versus the potential pros and cons of behavioural measures. Since then, the OECD has conducted reviews of experience with structural separation in many countries and in a variety of sectors. The sectors have always included electricity, gas, railways and telecommunications, in addition to other sectors. In 2011, the Recommendation was modified to ensure that potential impacts on investment are taken into account when the possible appropriateness of structural separation is considered.
    [Show full text]
  • 2019-20 U.S. FIGURE SKATING MEDIA GUIDE Nathan Chen 2019 World Champion Vincent Zhou 2019 World Bronze Medalist TABLE of CONTENTS
    2019-20 U.S. FIGURE SKATING MEDIA GUIDE Nathan Chen 2019 World champion Vincent Zhou 2019 World bronze medalist TABLE OF CONTENTS U.S. FIGURE SKATING U.S. Ladies Team .....................31 Marketing & Communications Staff ...... 2 U.S. Men’s Team ......................45 Media Credential Guidelines ............ 3 U.S. Pairs Team ......................63 Headquarters ..........................6 U.S. Ice Dance Team .................75 Figure Skating on Television ............ 7 HISTORY & RESULTS Streaming Figure Skating Online . .8 History of Figure Skating ..............88 Figure Skating by the Numbers .........9 World & U.S. Hall of Fame ............ 90 Figure Skating Record Book .......... 94 VIEWERS GUIDE TO FIGURE SKATING Olympic Winter Games ............... 102 Disciplines ............................ 10 World Championships ................108 Ladies & Men’s .........................11 World Junior Championships ......... 128 Pairs .................................12 Four Continents Championships ...... 138 Ice Dance ............................13 Grand Prix Final. .144 INTERNATIONAL JUDGING SYSTEM Junior Grand Prix Final ...............150 Overview .............................14 Skate America ....................... 156 Judges & Officials .....................15 U.S. Championships .................. 165 Program Components .................16 IJS Best Scores ...................... 185 Calculations ..........................17 U.S. Qualifying Best Scores ........... 189 Scales of Values (SOV) ................18 Skate America Best
    [Show full text]
  • (I) Architectural Association (UK) AA
    A&I abstract and indexes (or abstracting and indexing services) AA (i) Architectural Association (UK) AA (ii) accepted manuscript AAAS American Association for the Advancement of Science AACR Anglo-American Cataloguing Rules AACR2 Anglo-American Cataloguing Rules 2nd ed. AAI authentication and authorization infrastructure AAM author accepted manuscript AAP American Association of Publishers AARL Australian Academic and Research Libraries AAU (i) Association of American Universities AAU (ii) additional authorized user AAUP Association of American University Presses ABA American Booksellers Association ABC (i) African Books Collective ABC (ii) Audit Bureau of Circulation ABES Agence Bibliographique de l'Enseignement Supérieur (France) ABI application binary interface ABI/INFORM Abstracted Business Information - abstracting and indexing database of business and management journals ABOR Arizona Board of Regents ABTOE Association of Bookseller and Publisher Training Organizations ACAP automated content access protocol ACH Automatic Clearing House ACKU Afghanistan Centre at Kabul University ACM Association for Computing Machinery ACP American College of Physicians ACPJC ACP Journal Club ACQUIS acquisitions usb-system of MINISIS ACRL Association of College and Research Libraries ACROBAT Adobe software for sending formatted documents between people using word processing or DTP ACS American Chemical Society ACS/POD American Chemical Society/Page-image on Optical Disk Project at UCL ACTS Advanced Communications Technologies and Services - EC DGX111
    [Show full text]
  • Linz 2019 ‒ EUSAAT 2019 Proceedings
    Linz 2019 ‒ EUSAAT 2019 Volume 8, No. 1 ISSN 2194-0479 (2019) ALTEX Proceedings 3D Models & multi-organ- Ethical & legal issues chips (MOC), human-organ-chips (HOC) Free communications 3R Centers in Europe & Implementing international – EU Dir 63/2010 – update national and local centers In silico models 3Rs in education Initiative for and academia implementing serum Advanced safety testing of free culture media cosmetics & consumer In vitro techniques for products and alternatives CNS toxicity and disease to animal testing in studies food safety, nutrition and efficacy Reduction & refinement An integrated Replacement – advanced interdisciplinary approach technologies to animal-free nano- Specific endpoints of material and chemical toxicity safety assessment: Results of the in3 project Stem cell models and technology Biological barriers (hIPS, ES, mES, mIPS…) Disease models using How to account for human cells, uncertainties of reference tissues and organs methods & data? Ecotoxicology Animal experimentation: Efficacy and safety Working towards testing of drugs, a paradigm change medical devices & 'Young Scientists' session biopharmaceutics The world leader in innovative 3D reconstructed human tissue models ISO 9001 CERTIFIED KEY FEATURES OF OUR PRODUCTS TISSUE MODELS AVAILABLE FROM SLOVAKIA AND USA Metabolically active, human cell-derived, 3D reconstructed tissue models EpiDerm™ Objective, quantifiable endpoints Skin Corrosion, Skin Irritation, Phototoxicity, Genotoxicity Excellent in vitro / in vivo correlation Micronucleus and Comet
    [Show full text]
  • Pension Savings: the Real Return | 2019 Edition
    Pension Savings: The Real Return | ReturnPension The | Real Savings: 2019 Edition 1 | P a g e Pension Savings: The Real Return 2019 Edition A Research Report by BETTER FINANCE COORDINATORS Ján Šebo Ştefan Dragoş Voicu CONTRIBUTORS Carsten Andersen Aleksandra Mączyńska Edoardo Carlucci Alessandra Manis Lubomir Christoff Michal Mešťan Michel Deinema Grégoire Naacke Laetitia Gabaut Lina Strandvåg Nagell Timothée Galvaire Guillaume Prache Johannes Hagen Joanna Rutecka-Góra José Antonio Herce Dr. Thomas Url Arnaud Houdmont Aiste Vysniauskaite Acronyms AIF Alternative Investment Fund AMC Annual Management Charges AuM Assets under Management BE Belgium BG Bulgaria Bln Billion BPETR ‘Barclay’s Pan-European High Yield Total Return’ Index CAC 40 ‘Cotation Assistée en Continu 40’ Index CMU Capital Markets Union Edition DAX 30 ‘Deutsche Aktieindex 30’ Index DB Defined Benefit plan 2019 DC Defined Contribution plan DE Germany DG Directorate General of the Commission of the European Union DK Denmark DWP United Kingdom’s Governmental Agency Department for Work and Pensions EBA European Banking Authority EE Estonia EEE Exempt-Exempt-Exempt Regime EET Exempt-Exempt-Tax Regime ETF Exchange-Traded Fund EIOPA European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority ES Spain Pension Savings: The Real Return | ReturnPension The | Real Savings: ESAs European Supervisory Authorities ESMA European Securities and Markets Authority EU European Union EURIBOR Euro InterBank Offered Rate EX Executive Summary FR France FSMA Financial Services and Market Authority (Belgium)
    [Show full text]
  • On the Relationship Between Economic Dynamics and Female Entrepreneurship: Reflections for the Visegrad Countries
    administrative sciences Article On the Relationship between Economic Dynamics and Female Entrepreneurship: Reflections for the Visegrad Countries Aleksandra Gawel 1,* and Agnieszka Głodowska 2 1 Department of International Competitiveness, Poznan University of Economics and Business, Al. Niepodległosci 10, 61-875 Poznan, Poland 2 Department of International Trade, Cracow University of Economics, ul. Rakowicka 27, 31-510 Kraków, Poland; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: The gender gap in entrepreneurship has been observed for a long time, explained by both female-specific and gender-neutral factors, but none of these explanations is generally accepted. The aim of the paper is to assess the effect of internal economic dynamics on female entrepreneurship. Economic dynamics is a persistent process affected simultaneously by both endogenous and exoge- nous factors of a different time horizon, with the development trend and the business cycle as the most important time perspectives. The decomposition procedure of time series is implemented to extract trend and cyclical fluctuations, after which the Vector Error Correction Model (VECM) method is used to estimate models showing the impact of economic dynamics on female entrepreneurship in the long- and medium-run. The study concerns the countries of the Visegrad Group, including Czechia, Hungary, Poland, and Slovakia, and is based on quarterly data from the years 1998 to 2020. The results show that, although the economic dynamics impact female entrepreneurship, to some extent, it is not the most dominant factor. The impact of economic dynamics on female entrepreneurship is much stronger in the trend perspective than in the business cycle perspective.
    [Show full text]
  • 2019-20 PGA TOUR Player Handbook
    PGA TOUR PLAYER HANDBOOK & TOURNAMENT REGULATIONS 2019-2020 2019–2020 PLAYER HANDBOOK & TOURNAMENT REGULATIONS PGA TOUR 112 PGA TOUR Boulevard Ponte Vedra Beach, FL 32082 Telephone: 904-285-3700 1 Dear PGA TOUR members, Welcome to the PGA TOUR. This directory was compiled to assist you in your preparation for a season on the PGA TOUR. The Player Handbook includes a 2019–2020 tournament schedule and covers such topics as special event eligibility and special awards. The Tournament Regulations are the guide to specific rules pertaining to PGA TOUR play. We have incorporated changes made to the Tournament Regulations since last season into this season’s book. In addition, the index provides quick reference. These Regulations are the final authority on the operations and policies of the PGA TOUR. I encourage every member to become familiar with these rules. Best wishes for a successful 2019–2020 season! Jay Monahan Commissioner PGA TOUR 2 SIGNIFICANT CHANGES FOR THE 2019–2020 SEASON • The primary cut was lowered from 70 players and ties to 65 players and ties. The secondary cut was eliminated. • The cut size at The American Express will be 65 players and ties with no secondary cut. • The cut size at the AT&T Pebble Beach Pro-Am will remain 60 professional players and ties. Professionals finishing 61st to 65th and ties will receive FedExCup points and offi- cial prize money normally distributed to those places. • The Zurich Classic of New Orleans will have a cut size of 33 teams and ties. • THE CJ CUP, The ZOZO CHAMPIONSHIP, BMW Championship and World Golf Championship events will remain no cut events.
    [Show full text]