DOCSLIB.ORG

European Election Study EES 2019 Voter Study Release Notes

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
European Election Study EES 2019 Voter Study Release Notes European Election Study EES 2019 Voter Study Release Notes Sebastian Adrian Popa Wouter van der Brug Sara B. Hobolt Hermann Schmitt First release 1 November 2019 MZES, University of Mannheim 1 Table of Contents Acknowledgement of the data ................................................................................................................. 3 Acknowledgements ................................................................................................................................... 4 Structure of the data file .......................................................................................................................... 6 Variable Specific notes ............................................................................................................................. 8 Appendix 1: EES 2019 party codes and variable .................................................................................. 9 Appendix 2: Q27 candidate recognition battery ................................................................................. 35 Appendix 3, Weights .............................................................................................................................. 37 2 Acknowledgement of the data Users of the data are kindly asked to acknowledge use of the data by always citing the data: How to cite this data: Schmitt, Hermann, Hobolt, Sara B, van der Brug, Wouter and Popa, Sebastian A (2019) European Parliament Election Study 2019, Voter Study. How to cite this document: Sebastian Adrian Popa; van der Brug, Wouter; Hobolt, Sara B and Schmitt, Hermann. (2019) EES 2019 Voter Study Advance Release Notes. Mannheim: MZES, University of Mannheim. 3 Acknowledgements The EES 2019 Voter Study was organized and designed by the EES 2019 Task force: Wouter van der Brug (co-chair) Sara B. Hobolt (co-chair) Sebastian Adrian Popa (treasurer) Hermann Schmitt Eftichia Teperoglou Ilke Toygur Claes de Vreese Catherine de Vries The data collection of the 2019 EES Voter Study was generously funded by Volkswagen Foundation. Additional grants from the MZES at the University of Mannheim and the Amsterdam Center for European Studies at the University of Amsterdam supported planning and realization of the study. The study also benefitted from the excellent work of Gallup International, and Pascal Chelala in particular. Gallup International carried out the fieldwork in all the 28 member countries. Last but not least, the study would not have been possible without the help of many colleagues, and country experts form the wider academic community, who spent valuable time on the questionnaire and study preparation, often at very short notice. We are grateful for their help making this Voter Study possible. Austria Sylvia Kritzinger and Markus Wagner Belgium Pierre Baudewyns Bulgaria Milena Milenova Croatia Andrija Henjak and Daniel Sirinic, Cyprus Giorgos Charalambous and Christina Ioannou Czech Republic Lukas Linek Denmark Sara Hobolt, Robert Klemmensen, Kasper Møller Hansen Estonia Piret Ehin, Liisa Talvig and Nikita Lumijõe Finland Hanna Wass Miroslav Nemčok and Rasmus Siren France Nicolas Sauger Germany Hermann Schmitt Greece Eftichia Teperoglou Hungary Levente Littvay and Gabor Toka Ireland Michael Marsh and Gail McElroy Italy Cristiano Vezzoni and Federico Vegetti Latvia Jānis Ikstens Lithuania Aine Ramonite Luxembourg Dan Schmit Netherlands Wouter van der Brug Poland Radek Markoski, Mikołaj Cześnik and Michał Kotnarowski Portugal Ana Belchior 4 Romania Andrei Gheorghita and Raluca Poop Slovenia Simona Kustec-Lipicer Slovakia Olga Gyarfasova Spain Pedro Riera and Ilke Toygur Sweden Linda Berg, Henrik Ekengren Oscarsson and Maja Sörebro UK Sara Hobolt, Geoff Evans, Jane Green EES Master Sara Hobolt, Hermann Schmitt, Wouter van der Brug and Sebastian Popa 5 Structure of the data file We encourage users of the data to contact us should they spot any errors or anomalies in the data via email at [email protected] (Dr Sebastian Popa). Variable names The data file consists of sets of variables distinguished by the characters Q, QG, D and W The variable order and –numbering reflect that of the EES2019 Voter Study, Master questionnaire. Q and QG variables comprise the interview questions, with the important distinction that Q questions were commissioned by the EES team and QG question were added by Gallup International. The EES team does not take any responsibility over the wording and translation of QG questions. Both variable order and –numbering reflect that of the 2019 Master Questionnaire. D variables represent the socio-demographic variable. The variable order and-2019 master questionnaire. W variables are additional variables, based either on additional information from the fieldwork agency, or derived on the basis of questionnaire variables. The weighting variables with a name ending in “pol” are based on both standard and political weighting factors: gender x age, education, urbanization, region (Nuts), turnout European Elections and results European Elections by party. See more information about the weighting variables in Appendix 3. Missing Values All Q, QG, and D variables follow an identical missing values labeling scheme. 97: Refused [REF] 98: Don't Know [DK] 99: No answer [NA] For the q10, q13 and qp24 batteries, the we added: 98: Do not know the party/ Do not know how to place the party Please note that no missing values have been defined in the data file, so it is up to the researcher to decide how to deal with various causes of missing data. Where possible, the original question codes have been maintained as subfixes. Missing values are not country specific. The original vote choice question are: Q2 (Party that would best handle MIP), Q7 (Vote choice in the 2019 EP elections) Q9 (vote choice in previous national elections) and while the original party ID question is Q25. Based on these variables we computed a new set of variables (Q2_ees, Q7_ees, Q9_ees and Q25_ees) assigning unique values that correspond to EES 2009 Voter Study and EES 2014 Voter Study. In case the parties were not included in the previous studies we assigned a new code. These codes can also be used to link the EES data with 6 other existing datasets (e.g. Euromanifesto Project, CHES, ParlGov). The questions regarding the original placement of parties along the left-right continuum (Q13_), EU integration (Q24_) and the probability to vote questions (Q10_) represent a special case. For these variables, not the answer options, but the actual questions vary by country. For these three sets of questions, the specific party probed is described in these release notes (see below). The order of these party-questions is identical for all three questions (i.e., Q10_, Q13_ and Q24_) and (with the exception of Cyprus) is identical to the order used in the original country questionnaires. Furthermore, for the party choice variables we create a new set of variables ending in the letter n (i.e. Q2n, Q7n, Q9n, Q25n) which represents a unique party coted that matches the party order for Q10_, Q13_ and Q24_. Practically the order of parties is the same across Q2n, Q7n, Q9n, Q25n, Q10_, Q13_ and Q24_. A list containing the national party names (per variable), as well as the corresponding party codes (used in the vote choice and party ID questions), is provided below (Appendix 1: EES 2019 party codes and variables). 7 Variable Specific notes The following is a description of those variables where additional information may be required. Embargoed items The following items present in the Master Questionnaire are not present in the EES2019 Voter Study Pre-release Q15, Q17, Q28, Q29, Q30 and Q31. This items are under embargo and will be made available at a later date. Qp2, Q7, Q9 and Q25-– Party Choice Questions Q2, Q7, Q9 and qpp24-– ask for EU and national party choice – the answer options (parties) vary per country. Country specific codes have been recoded and now start with a country prefix (1+ISO) followed by a specific code per party (last three digits indicate the party family), see variables Q2_ees, Q7_ees, Q9_ees and Q25_ees. Labels for Q2_ees, Q7_ees, Q9_ees and Q25_ees are included in the integrated data file. See the below spreadsheet (i.e Appendix 1: EES 2019 party codes and variables) for the for the party names and codes used in these questions, as well as questions q Q10_, Q13_ and Q24_. Please note that in Luxembourg the 2019 EP elections we concurrent with national parliament elections. Q7 therefore asks what R voted in the concurrent national election. Q10_xx, Q13_xx and Q24_xx. Q10_xx (probability to vote), Q13_xx (left-right placement), Q24_xx : each questions probes one specific party. The party probed is documented below. The suffixes (_xx) are consistent for the three blocs of questions and with the party order in variables Q2n, Q7n, Q9n and Q25n. With a few exceptions in the case of Cyprus, they are identical to those used in the original language questionnaires Note that order of the parties is fixed, and identical to that used in the original language questionnaire. The starting point of the rotation (first question asked) varies per respondent and question bloc. Q27 Candidate recognition battery. To ease analysis (and avoid possible embarrassment), the correct answers are: Q27_1: European People's Party\ (NATIONAL PARTY) (2) Q27_2: Socialists & Democrats\ (NATIONAL PARTY) (1) Q27_3: The European Conservative and Reformists\ (NATIONAL PARTY) (3) See Appendix 2 for the complete list of national parties used in Q27. 8 Appendix
Load more

Recommended publications
  • (CEF) 2019 TRANSPORT MAP CALL Proposal for the Selection of Projects
    Connecting Europe Facility (CEF) 2019 TRANSPORT MAP CALL Proposal for the selection of projects July 2020 Innovation and Networks Executive Agency THE PROJECT DESCRIPTIONS IN THIS PUBLICATION ARE AS SUPPLIED BY APPLICANTS IN THE TENTEC PROPOSAL SUBMIS- SION SYSTEM. THE INNOVATION AND NETWORKS EXECUTIVE AGENCY CANNOT BE HELD RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY ISSUE ARISING FROM SAID DESCRIPTIONS. The Innovation and Networks Executive Agency is not liable for any consequence from the reuse of this publication. Brussels, Innovation and Networks Executive Agency (INEA), 2020 © European Union, 2020 Reuse is authorised provided the source is acknowledged. Distorting the original meaning or message of this document is not allowed. The reuse policy of European Commission documents is regulated by Decision 2011/833/EU (OJ L 330, 14.12.2011, p. 39). For any use or reproduction of photos and other material that is not under the copyright of the European Union, permission must be sought directly from the copyright holders. PDF ISBN 978-92-9208-086-0 doi:10.2840/16208 EF-02-20-472-EN-N Page 2 / 168 Table of Contents Commonly used abbreviations ......................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 7 Introduction ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Growth Anatomy of Croatian Economy
    Munich Personal RePEc Archive Growth Anatomy of Croatian Economy Cizmovic, Mirjana and Jankovic, Jelena and Popovic, Milenko ISEA Mediterranean Univerzity, ISEA, ISEA Mediterranean Univerzity 1 September 2015 Online at https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/66478/ MPRA Paper No. 66478, posted 08 Sep 2015 14:48 UTC RIFIN and Faculty of Economics, Zagreb: International Scientific Conference: Croatian Economic Crisis and Shift from Recession to Economic Development Zagreb, Croatia, October 2015 Mirjana Čizmović, Institute for Socio-Economic Analysis, Podgorica, Montenegro & Mediterranean University, Podgorica, Montenegro Jelena Janković, Institute for Socio-Economic Analysis, Podgorica, Montenegro & Central Bank of Montenegro, Podgorica, Montenegro Milenko Popović, Institute for Socio-Economic Analysis, Podgorica, Montenegro & Mediterranean University, Podgorica, Montenegro Growth Anatomy of Croatian Economy Abstract: In this paper presented is research on anatomy of growth of Croatian economy in the period 1990-2013. Results of this analysis basically should be understood as a kind of growth diagnostic of Croatian economy. Conventional sources of growth analysis, which measure contribution of different factors of production, is given for growth of GDP and per capita GDP in relevant sub-periods. To get deeper understanding of results provided in this way, authors continue with analysis of sectorial side sources of growth. Further insights are provided by demand side sources of growth. Particular attention is, in that respect, devoted to analysis of net-export, capital formation and final consumption. Brief notions on institutional and other fundamental causes of growth are given as well. Policy recommendations for overcoming existing deadlock and acceleration of economic growth are only briefly discussed in concluding section of the paper.
    [Show full text]
  • Freedom House, Its Academic Advisers, and the Author(S) of This Report
    Croatia by Tena Prelec Capital: Zagreb Population: 4.17 million GNI/capita, PPP: $22,880 Source: World Bank World Development Indicators. Nations in Transit Ratings and Averaged Scores NIT Edition 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 National Democratic 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.75 Governance Electoral Process 3.25 3.25 3.25 3.25 3.25 3.25 3.25 3 3 3 Civil Society 2.75 2.75 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.75 2.75 2.75 2.75 2.75 Independent Media 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4.25 4.25 Local Democratic 3.75 3.75 3.75 3.75 3.75 3.75 3.75 3.75 3.75 3.75 Governance Judicial Framework 4.25 4.25 4.25 4.25 4.25 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 and Independence Corruption 4.5 4.5 4.25 4 4 4 4 4.25 4.25 4.25 Democracy Score 3.71 3.71 3,64 3.61 3.61 3.68 3.68 3.68 3.71 3.75 NOTE: The ratings reflect the consensus of Freedom House, its academic advisers, and the author(s) of this report. The opinions expressed in this report are those of the author(s). The ratings are based on a scale of 1 to 7, with 1 representing the highest level of democratic progress and 7 the lowest. The Democracy Score is an average of ratings for the categories tracked in a given year.
    [Show full text]
  • The Jewish Middle Class in Vienna in the Late Nineteenth and Early Twentieth Centuries
    The Jewish Middle Class in Vienna in the Late Nineteenth and Early Twentieth Centuries Erika Weinzierl Emeritus Professor of History University of Vienna Working Paper 01-1 October 2003 ©2003 by the Center for Austrian Studies (CAS). Permission to reproduce must generally be obtained from CAS. Copying is permitted in accordance with the fair use guidelines of the U.S. Copyright Act of 1976. CAS permits the following additional educational uses without permission or payment of fees: academic libraries may place copies of CAS Working Papers on reserve (in multiple photocopied or electronically retrievable form) for students enrolled in specific courses; teachers may reproduce or have reproduced multiple copies (in photocopied or electronic form) for students in their courses. Those wishing to reproduce CAS Working Papers for any other purpose (general distribution, advertising or promotion, creating new collective works, resale, etc.) must obtain permission from the Center for Austrian Studies, University of Minnesota, 314 Social Sciences Building, 267 19th Avenue S., Minneapolis MN 55455. Tel: 612-624-9811; fax: 612-626-9004; e-mail: [email protected] 1 Introduction: The Rise of the Viennese Jewish Middle Class The rapid burgeoning and advancement of the Jewish middle class in Vienna commenced with the achievement of fully equal civil and legal rights in the Fundamental Laws of December 1867 and the inter-confessional Settlement (Ausgleich) of 1868. It was the victory of liberalism and the constitutional state, a victory which had immediate and phenomenal demographic and social consequences. In 1857, Vienna had a total population of 287,824, of which 6,217 (2.16 per cent) were Jews.
    [Show full text]
  • IGC Plenary 2005
    Agenda of the Annual Meeting of the FAI Gliding Commission To be held in Lausanne, Switzerland on 5th and 6th March 2010 Agenda for the IGC Plenary 2010 Day 1, Friday 5th March 2010 Session: Opening and Reports (Friday 09.15 – 10.45) 1. Opening (Bob Henderson) 1.1 Roll Call (Stéphane Desprez/Peter Eriksen) 1.2 Administrative matters (Peter Eriksen) 1.3 Declaration of Conflicts of Interest 2. Minutes of previous meeting, Lausanne, 6th-7th March 2009 (Peter Eriksen) 3. IGC President’s report (Bob Henderson) 4. FAI Matters (Mr.Stéphane Desprez) 4.1 Update by the Secretary General 5. Finance (Dick Bradley) 5.1 2009 Financial report 5.2 Financial statement and budget 6. Reports not requiring voting 6.1 OSTIV report (Loek Boermans) Please note that reports under Agenda items 6.2, 6.3 and 6.4 are made available on the IGC web-site, and will not necessarily be presented. The Committees and Specialists will be available for questions. 6.2 Standing Committees 6.2.1 Communications and PR Report (Bob Henderson) 6.2.2 Championship Management Committee Report (Eric Mozer) 6.2.3 Sporting Code Committee Report (Ross Macintyre) 6.2.4 Air Traffic, Navigation, Display Systems (ANDS) Report (Bernald Smith) 6.2.5 GNSS Flight Recorder Approval Committee (GFAC) Report (Ian Strachan) 6.2.6 FAI Commission on Airspace and Navigation Systems (CANS) Report (Ian Strachan) Session: Reports from Specialists and Competitions (Friday 11.15 – 12.45) 6.3 Working Groups 6.3.1 Country Development Report (Alexander Georgas) 6.3.2 Grand Prix Action Plan (Bob Henderson) 6.3.3 History Committee (Tor Johannessen) 6.3.4 Scoring Working Group (Visa-Matti Leinikki) 6.4 IGC Specialists 6.4.1 CASI Report (Air Sports Commissions) (Tor Johannessen) 6.4.2 EGU/EASA Report (Patrick Pauwels) 6.4.3 Environmental Commission Report (Bernald Smith) 6.4.4 Membership (John Roake) 6.4.5 On-Line Contest Report (Axel Reich) 6.4.6 Simulated Gliding Report (Roland Stuck) 6.4.7 Trophy Management Report (Marina Vigorita) 6.4.8 Web Management Report (Peter Ryder) 7.
    [Show full text]
  • ESS9 Appendix A3 Political Parties Ed
    APPENDIX A3 POLITICAL PARTIES, ESS9 - 2018 ed. 3.0 Austria 2 Belgium 4 Bulgaria 7 Croatia 8 Cyprus 10 Czechia 12 Denmark 14 Estonia 15 Finland 17 France 19 Germany 20 Hungary 21 Iceland 23 Ireland 25 Italy 26 Latvia 28 Lithuania 31 Montenegro 34 Netherlands 36 Norway 38 Poland 40 Portugal 44 Serbia 47 Slovakia 52 Slovenia 53 Spain 54 Sweden 57 Switzerland 58 United Kingdom 61 Version Notes, ESS9 Appendix A3 POLITICAL PARTIES ESS9 edition 3.0 (published 10.12.20): Changes from previous edition: Additional countries: Denmark, Iceland. ESS9 edition 2.0 (published 15.06.20): Changes from previous edition: Additional countries: Croatia, Latvia, Lithuania, Montenegro, Portugal, Slovakia, Spain, Sweden. Austria 1. Political parties Language used in data file: German Year of last election: 2017 Official party names, English 1. Sozialdemokratische Partei Österreichs (SPÖ) - Social Democratic Party of Austria - 26.9 % names/translation, and size in last 2. Österreichische Volkspartei (ÖVP) - Austrian People's Party - 31.5 % election: 3. Freiheitliche Partei Österreichs (FPÖ) - Freedom Party of Austria - 26.0 % 4. Liste Peter Pilz (PILZ) - PILZ - 4.4 % 5. Die Grünen – Die Grüne Alternative (Grüne) - The Greens – The Green Alternative - 3.8 % 6. Kommunistische Partei Österreichs (KPÖ) - Communist Party of Austria - 0.8 % 7. NEOS – Das Neue Österreich und Liberales Forum (NEOS) - NEOS – The New Austria and Liberal Forum - 5.3 % 8. G!LT - Verein zur Förderung der Offenen Demokratie (GILT) - My Vote Counts! - 1.0 % Description of political parties listed 1. The Social Democratic Party (Sozialdemokratische Partei Österreichs, or SPÖ) is a social above democratic/center-left political party that was founded in 1888 as the Social Democratic Worker's Party (Sozialdemokratische Arbeiterpartei, or SDAP), when Victor Adler managed to unite the various opposing factions.
    [Show full text]
  • The Case of Lega Nord
    TILBURG UNIVERSITY UNIVERSITY OF TRENTO MSc Sociology An integrated and dynamic approach to the life cycle of populist radical right parties: the case of Lega Nord Supervisors: Dr Koen Abts Prof. Mario Diani Candidate: Alessandra Lo Piccolo 2017/2018 1 Abstract: This work aims at explaining populist radical right parties’ (PRRPs) electoral success and failure over their life-cycle by developing a dynamic and integrated approach to the study of their supply-side. For this purpose, the study of PRRPs is integrated building on concepts elaborated in the field of contentious politics: the political opportunity structure, the mobilizing structure and the framing processes. This work combines these perspectives in order to explain the fluctuating electoral fortune of the Italian Lega Nord at the national level (LN), here considered as a prototypical example of PRRPs. After the first participation in a national government (1994) and its peak in the general election of 1996 (10.1%), the LN electoral performances have been characterised by constant fluctuations. However, the party has managed to survive throughout different phases of the recent Italian political history. Scholars have often explained the party’s electoral success referring to its folkloristic appeal, its regionalist and populist discourses as well as the strong leadership of Umberto Bossi. However, most contributions adopt a static and one-sided analysis of the party performances, without integrating the interplay between political opportunities, organisational resources and framing strategies in a dynamic way. On the contrary, this work focuses on the interplay of exogenous and endogenous factors in accounting for the fluctuating electoral results of the party over three phases: regionalist phase (1990-1995), the move to the right (1998-2003) and the new nationalist period (2012-2018).
    [Show full text]
  • Latvian Foreign and Security Policy
    Supported by: In cooperation with: The Latvian Foreign and Security Policy Yearbook 2018 aims to contribute to the understanding of Latvia’s foreign and security policy decisions and considerations in 2017, as well as assess the opportunities and concerns that await Latvia in 2018. During the past year Latvia saw considerable improvements in its security situation, while simultaneously met with new international and regional challenges. 2018 promises to be a similarly dynamic year full of opportunities and tests. Latvia will have to make brave and strong choices in its foreign and security policy. Supported by: the Parliament of the Republic of Latvia and the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Republic of Latvia In cooperation with: Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung Editors: Andris Sprūds, Ilvija Bruģe Authors: Māris Andžāns, Kristiāns Andžāns, Aldis Austers, Reinis Āboltiņš, Una Aleksandra Bērziņa-Čerenkova, Sintija Broka, Ilvija Bruģe, Kārlis Bukovskis, Alina Clay, Lolita Čigāne, Mārtiņš Daugulis, Justīne Elferte, Ilze Garoza, Ojārs Ēriks Kalniņš, Andis Kudors, Imants Lieģis, Žaneta Ozoliņa, Gunta Pastore, Diāna Potjomkina, Edgars Rinkēvičs, Uģis Romanovs, Ojārs Skudra, Andris Sprūds Project coordinators: Ilvija Bruģe, Sintija Broka The opinions expressed here are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the positions of the Latvian Institute of International Affairs, Parliament of the Republic of Latvia, Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Republic of Latvia or Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung or represent the opinion of any government authority or ministry. Translation from Latvian: Ingmārs Bisenieks English language editor: Līvija Uskale Layout: Oskars Stalidzāns Cover design: Kristīne Plūksna-Zvagule This book is published in collaboration with the Publishers Zinātne © Authors of the articles, 2018 © Translation: Ingmārs Bisenieks, 2018 ISBN 978-9934-567-18-6 © Layout: Oskars Stalidzāns, 2018 UDK 327(474.3)”20”(058) © Cover design: Kristīne Plūksna-Zvagule, 2018 Sp950 © Latvian Institute of International Affairs, 2018 TABLE OF CONTENTS FOREWORD Andris Sprūds .
    [Show full text]
  • Investing in Destabilisation: How Foreign Money Is Used to Undermine Democracy in the EU
    STUDY Requested by the INGE committee Investing in destabilisation: How foreign money is used to undermine democracy in the EU @Adobe Stock Author: Edoardo BRESSANELLI (Sant’Anna School of Advanced Studies) European Parliament Coordinator: Policy Department for External Relations Directorate General for External Policies of the Union EN PE 653.631 - April 2021 DIRECTORATE-GENERAL FOR EXTERNAL POLICIES POLICY DEPARTMENT STUDY Investing in destabilisation: How foreign money is used to undermine democracy in the EU ABSTRACT Foreign interference has become a major security threat for democracies. The European Union (EU) provides no exception and, in the last few years, has significantly stepped up its efforts to counter this threat. A specific type of foreign interference is the foreign funding of political parties. At the national level, regulations banning or limiting foreign funding are currently in place in most member states, but there is still significant variation across them. At the EU level, the recent reforms of the regulation on the funding of the Europarties and their associated foundations have banned contributions from abroad. Notwithstanding such welcome changes to party regulations, cases of foreign funding are still being reported in several member states, with foreign actors exploiting regulatory loopholes to channel funds or provide other types of support. To tackle this issue more effectively, regulatory convergence at the national level should be promoted, the transparency of party accounts should be enhanced, and the monitoring and sanctioning powers of the relevant control authorities strengthened. EP/EXPO/INGE/2020/01 EN April 2021 - PE 653.631 © European Union, 2021 AUTHOR • Edoardo BRESSANELLI, Assistant Professor, Sant’Anna School of Advanced Studies, Italy This study was originally requested by the European Parliament's Special Committee on Foreign Interference in all Democratic Processes in the European Union, including Disinformation.
    [Show full text]
  • Dynamics of Youth Euroscepticism a Thesis
    DYNAMICS OF YOUTH EUROSCEPTICISM A THESIS SUBMITED TO THE GARADUATE SCHOOL OF SOCIAL SCIENCES OF MIDDLE EAST TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY BY ÖNDER KÜÇÜKURAL IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF SCIENCE IN SOCIOLOGY DECEMBER 2005 Approval of the Graduate School of Social Sciences Prof.Dr. Sencer Ayata Director I certify that this thesis satisfies all the requirements as a thesis for the degree of Master of Science. Assoc. Prof. Dr. Sibel Kalaycıoğlu Head of Department This is to certify that we have read this thesis and that in our opinion it is fully adequate, in scope and quality, as a thesis for the degree of Master of Science. Dr. Mustafa Şen Supervisor Examining Committee Members Assoc. Prof. Dr. Galip Yalman (METU, ADM) Dr. Mustafa Şen (METU, Sociology) Assist. Prof. Dr Aykan Erdemir (METU, Sociology) I hereby declare that all information in this document has been obtained and presented in accordance with academic rules and ethical conduct. I also declare that, as required by these rules and conduct, I have fully cited and referenced all material and results that are not original to this work. Name, Last name : Önder Küçükural Signature : iii ABSTRACT Dynamics of Youth Euroscepticism Küçükural, Önder M.Sc., Department of Sociology Supervisor: Dr. Mustafa Şen December 2005, 138 pages The aim of this thesis is to describe the dominant features of Euroscepticism in Turkish context and to understand its main dynamics with special reference to a particular group, the youth in Turkey. A field research was conducted in order to understand youth’s EU support.
    [Show full text]
  • Internal Politics and Views on Brexit
    BRIEFING PAPER Number 8362, 2 May 2019 The EU27: Internal Politics By Stefano Fella, Vaughne Miller, Nigel Walker and Views on Brexit Contents: 1. Austria 2. Belgium 3. Bulgaria 4. Croatia 5. Cyprus 6. Czech Republic 7. Denmark 8. Estonia 9. Finland 10. France 11. Germany 12. Greece 13. Hungary 14. Ireland 15. Italy 16. Latvia 17. Lithuania 18. Luxembourg 19. Malta 20. Netherlands 21. Poland 22. Portugal 23. Romania 24. Slovakia 25. Slovenia 26. Spain 27. Sweden www.parliament.uk/commons-library | intranet.parliament.uk/commons-library | [email protected] | @commonslibrary 2 The EU27: Internal Politics and Views on Brexit Contents Summary 6 1. Austria 13 1.1 Key Facts 13 1.2 Background 14 1.3 Current Government and Recent Political Developments 15 1.4 Views on Brexit 17 2. Belgium 25 2.1 Key Facts 25 2.2 Background 25 2.3 Current Government and recent political developments 26 2.4 Views on Brexit 28 3. Bulgaria 32 3.1 Key Facts 32 3.2 Background 32 3.3 Current Government and recent political developments 33 3.4 Views on Brexit 35 4. Croatia 37 4.1 Key Facts 37 4.2 Background 37 4.3 Current Government and recent political developments 38 4.4 Views on Brexit 39 5. Cyprus 42 5.1 Key Facts 42 5.2 Background 42 5.3 Current Government and recent political developments 43 5.4 Views on Brexit 45 6. Czech Republic 49 6.1 Key Facts 49 6.2 Background 49 6.3 Current Government and recent political developments 50 6.4 Views on Brexit 53 7.
    [Show full text]
  • Stemmingen Moties Luchtvaart Hierover Voor De Begrotingsbehandeling Te Informeren, En Gaat Over Tot De Orde Van De Dag
    8 moedigen, bijvoorbeeld door een heffing, en de Kamer Stemmingen moties Luchtvaart hierover voor de begrotingsbehandeling te informeren, en gaat over tot de orde van de dag. Aan de orde zijn de stemmingen over moties, ingediend bij het VAO Luchtvaart, Naar mij blijkt, wordt de indiening ervan voldoende ondersteund. te weten: Zij krijgt nr. 460, was nr. 456 (31936). - de motie-Laçin over het maximale aantal vliegbewegin- gen op Luchthaven Lelystad (31936, nr. 442) (overgenomen); Ik stel vast dat wij hier nu over kunnen stemmen. - de motie-Laçin/Kröger over de gedoogconstructie voor Maastricht Aachen Airport (31936, nr. 443); - de motie-Laçin over sociale misstanden bij luchtvaart- De fractie van de PVV wordt aantekening verleend tegen maatschappijen (31936, nr. 444); de overgenomen motie op stuk nr. 442 te zijn. - de motie-Van Raan c.s. over breder definiëren van hinder als criterium (31936, nr. 445); In stemming komt de motie-Laçin/Kröger (31936, nr. 443). - de motie-Van Raan/Kröger over 500.000 vliegbewegingen als uitgangspunt voor handhaving (31936, nr. 446); De voorzitter: - de motie-Van Raan/Kröger over maximeren van het Ik constateer dat de leden van de fracties van de SP, de aantal vliegbewegingen op Schiphol (31936, nr. 447); PvdA, GroenLinks, de PvdD, 50PLUS, D66 en de Christen- - de motie-Van Raan c.s. over de verwachte uitstoot van Unie voor deze motie hebben gestemd en de leden van de CO2 (31936, nr. 448); overige fracties ertegen, zodat zij is verworpen. - de motie-Van Raan over scenariovoorstellen voor de luchtvaart (31936, nr. 449); In stemming komt de motie-Laçin (31936, nr.
    [Show full text]