Evolution of the New Zealand Mountain Flora

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more

ARTICLE IN PRESS Organisms, Diversity & Evolution 5 (2005) 237–247 www.elsevier.de/ode Evolution of the New Zealand mountain flora: Origins, diversification and dispersal RichardC. Winkworth a,Ã, Steven J. Wagstaffb, DavidGlenny b, Peter J. Lockhartc aDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Yale University, P.O. Box 208105, New Haven, CT 06520-8105, USA bManaaki Whenua Landcare Research, P.O. Box 69, Lincoln 8152, New Zealand cThe Allan Wilson Centre for Molecular Ecology and Evolution, Massey University, Private Bag 11222, Palmerston North, New Zealand Received11 May 2004; accepted16 December 2004 Abstract The New Zealand mountains provide a unique system in which to study the evolution of alpine plants. The relationship between the recent uplift of mountain habitats (5–2 million year ago (mya)) andfloristic diversity has polarizedhypotheses on the evolution of the alpine flora; suggestions have rangedfrom an ancient history in New Zealand to recent arrival by long distance dispersal from the Northern Hemisphere. Molecular phylogenies are now available for numerous New Zealandalpine plant groups andthese provideinsights into the evolution of this unique flora. Taken together with the fossil record, these studies suggest that many alpine lineages first arrived in New Zealand during the late Tertiary and subsequent radiations accompanied environmental upheaval in the Pliocene and Pleistocene. Ongoing studies are investigating the processes that contribute to morphological and ecological diversity in the New Zealandalpine flora. r 2005 Gesellschaft fu¨ r Biologische Systematik. Publishedby Elsevier GmbH. All rights reserved. Keywords: Biogeography; Dispersal; Ecological diversification; Morphological radiation; New Zealand alpine flora Introduction The New Zealandbiota has developedonan ancient continental landmass that was progressively isolated ‘‘With regardto general problems of biogeography, during the late Cretaceous and early Tertiary. Originally the biota of New Zealandhas been, perhaps, the most linkedto the Gondwanan supercontinent, New Zealand important of any in the world. It has figured promi- has been separatedfrom its closest continental neighbor, nently in all discussions of austral biogeography, and all Australia, by 2000 km for the last 60 million years (my). notable authorities have felt obligedto explain its The long isolation of New Zealandis reflectedin the history: explain New Zealandandthe worldfalls into generally oceanic character of its biota, andin this place aroundit’’ ( Nelson 1975). respect it is similar to Hawaii andthe Gala ´ pagos. However, New Zealandhas a much olderheritage than these strictly oceanic archipelagos, with a long pre- ÃCorresponding author. Tel.: +1 (203) 436 4992; history of dramatic environmental change that has fax: +1 (203) 432 3854. helpedshape its biota. More complex than most oceanic E-mail address: [email protected] (R.C. Winkworth). islands yet more tractable than many continental 1439-6092/$ - see front matter r 2005 Gesellschaft fu¨ r Biologische Systematik. Publishedby Elsevier GmbH. All rights reserved. doi:10.1016/j.ode.2004.12.001 ARTICLE IN PRESS 238 R.C. Winkworth et al. / Organisms, Diversity & Evolution 5 (2005) 237–247 systems, New Zealandprovidesunique opportunities to study evolution. The biogeographic history of New Zealandhas, as Nelson (1975) points out, attractedthe attention of many biogeographers. In this regard, the flora of its mountains (referredto here as the alpine flora) has been one of the most extensively studied elements. However, despite numerous detailed studies and several syntheses, hypotheses about the origins anddiversification of the New Zealandmountain flora have remainedpolarized– largely due to contrasting views on the relative importance of dispersal, geological change, and climatic fluctuations (McGlone et al. 2001). Recent advances in our knowledge of New Zealand’s geological and climatic history, andphylogenetic studies for a growing number of lineages have provided important insights into the origins andevolution of the alpine flora. In this review we have two goals: (i) to discuss insights from recent molecular phylogenetic studies, and (ii) to highlight Fig. 1. Extent of alpine areas in New Zealandandalpine plant distribution patterns. Areas above alpine tree line are indicated avenues for future research. As a framework for this as black silhouettes; montane habitats are more extensive, discussion, we first briefly summarize the alpine setting especially in the North Island. Gray lines indicate generalized in New Zealandandbiogeographic hypotheses concern- boundaries for two endemic-rich centers and an intervening ing the alpine flora. endemic-poor gap. Several individual mountains or mountain ranges described in the text are marked. There is little doubt that mountains are a geologically Discussion recent feature in New Zealand. For much of the last 85 my New Zealandhas been an isolatedlandmass of The New Zealand mountains limitedtopographic relief. Having broken away from Gondwana in the late Mesozoic, New Zealand con- Mountains dominate much of the New Zealand tinuedto separate from Australia until the early landscape. With the exception of the central North Paleocene. Throughout the late Cretaceous andearly Islandvolcanoes, the alpine zone is restrictedto a single, Tertiary the ancestral New Zealandlandmass suffered ruggedmountain chain that extendsfrom Stewart Island steady erosion. By the latest Oligocene only a scattered in the south, along the Southern Alps of the South archipelago of low-lying islands remained (Cooper and Island, and through the North Island to East Cape Cooper 1995). The general form of contemporary New (Fig. 1). Although largely contiguous, the New Zealand Zealandis the result of tectonic uplift that began axial mountains vary considerably in geomorphology, approximately 25 million year ago (mya) with the with five regions recognizedbasedon the underlying activation of the modern Pacific-Australian plate parent material. For example, the eastern mountains of boundary (Cooper et al. 1987; Kamp 1992). Miocene the Southern Alps (e.g., the Craigieburn Range) are tectonism ledto rapidchanges in distribution and composedof greywacke andargillite rocks. These topography, but the general uplift trendresultedin a formations underwent complex faulting during their narrow, elongate landmass of rugged relief. It was not uplift andare highly prone to frost shattering that until the Pliocene (5–2 mya) that the formation of the results in the extensive talus andscree slopes Alpine Fault system andthe increasing tempo of characteristic of this region. In contrast, folding and tectonic activity ledto the rapidelevation of the axial tilting of crustal sections formedthe Otago mountains in New Zealand( Ollier 1986; Cox and mountains (e.g., the OldMan Range). These Findlay 1995; Batt et al. 2000). Although the overall more rounded, undulating mountains are composed of form of these mountains reflects the original pattern of harder schist rocks and were not subjected to tectonism, many details of the contemporary relief are extensive glacial erosion (Holloway 1982; Whitehouse the result of extensive modification following uplift. In andPearce 1992 ). Such geological differences, as particular, the alpine landscape of the South Island was well as striking differences in past and present heavy modified by glaciation during the latest Pliocene climates, have resultedin a diversearray of habitat andPleistocene. From about 2.5 mya large areas of the types in the New Zealandmountains ( Whitehouse and Southern Alps were repeatedly glaciated, and many Pearce 1992). contemporary landforms relate directly to glacial ARTICLE IN PRESS R.C. Winkworth et al. / Organisms, Diversity & Evolution 5 (2005) 237–247 239 modeling or modification of glacial constructions. 1978). In contrast, Wardle (1963) and Fleming (1963) Although glaciation was more limitedin the North speculatedthat Tertiary New Zealandwouldnot have Island, cold climate processes, such as periglacial mass provided suitable environments for cool temperate movement, have strongly influencedlower North Island plants. Insteadthey suggestedthat ancestors of modern landscapes (Beu and Edwards 1984; McGlone 1985; alpine lineages may have spent this periodin cool Suggate 1990; Pillans et al. 1992; Markgraf et al. 1995). temperate areas to the south of New Zealand, re- Post-glacial erosion has also playedan important role in establishing in New Zealandonly after suitable habitats shaping the modern alpine landscape (Suggate 1990; became available in the late Pliocene andPleistocene. Pillans et al. 1992). Wardle (1963) hypothesizedthat a southern extension to The most distinctive North Island mountains are the New Zealand(or perhaps islandsto the south; see four volcanic peaks, three on the Central Plateau (Mt. Dawson 1988) wouldhave providedcool climates, Ruapehu, Mt. Ngauruhoe, andMt. Tongariro) andone to whereas Fleming (1963) favoredAntarctica as a the west (Mt. Taranaki). These mountains are younger potential refuge for cool-adapted lineages. than those of the axial ranges, having reachedtheir present A link between the New Zealandalpine flora and elevations during the last Pleistocene glacial or more floras of the northern temperate zone has long been recently. Their contemporary relief has been shapedby recognized. For example, in an analysis by Dawson both volcanic activity anderosion ( Holloway 1982). (1963) genera with north temperate affinities formedthe largest component of
Recommended publications
  • The Correspondence of Julius Haast and Joseph Dalton Hooker, 1861-1886

    The Correspondence of Julius Haast and Joseph Dalton Hooker, 1861-1886

    The Correspondence of Julius Haast and Joseph Dalton Hooker, 1861-1886 Sascha Nolden, Simon Nathan & Esme Mildenhall Geoscience Society of New Zealand miscellaneous publication 133H November 2013 Published by the Geoscience Society of New Zealand Inc, 2013 Information on the Society and its publications is given at www.gsnz.org.nz © Copyright Simon Nathan & Sascha Nolden, 2013 Geoscience Society of New Zealand miscellaneous publication 133H ISBN 978-1-877480-29-4 ISSN 2230-4495 (Online) ISSN 2230-4487 (Print) We gratefully acknowledge financial assistance from the Brian Mason Scientific and Technical Trust which has provided financial support for this project. This document is available as a PDF file that can be downloaded from the Geoscience Society website at: http://www.gsnz.org.nz/information/misc-series-i-49.html Bibliographic Reference Nolden, S.; Nathan, S.; Mildenhall, E. 2013: The Correspondence of Julius Haast and Joseph Dalton Hooker, 1861-1886. Geoscience Society of New Zealand miscellaneous publication 133H. 219 pages. The Correspondence of Julius Haast and Joseph Dalton Hooker, 1861-1886 CONTENTS Introduction 3 The Sumner Cave controversy Sources of the Haast-Hooker correspondence Transcription and presentation of the letters Acknowledgements References Calendar of Letters 8 Transcriptions of the Haast-Hooker letters 12 Appendix 1: Undated letter (fragment), ca 1867 208 Appendix 2: Obituary for Sir Julius von Haast 209 Appendix 3: Biographical register of names mentioned in the correspondence 213 Figures Figure 1: Photographs
  • Bio 308-Course Guide

    Bio 308-Course Guide

    COURSE GUIDE BIO 308 BIOGEOGRAPHY Course Team Dr. Kelechi L. Njoku (Course Developer/Writer) Professor A. Adebanjo (Programme Leader)- NOUN Abiodun E. Adams (Course Coordinator)-NOUN NATIONAL OPEN UNIVERSITY OF NIGERIA BIO 308 COURSE GUIDE National Open University of Nigeria Headquarters 14/16 Ahmadu Bello Way Victoria Island Lagos Abuja Office No. 5 Dar es Salaam Street Off Aminu Kano Crescent Wuse II, Abuja e-mail: [email protected] URL: www.nou.edu.ng Published by National Open University of Nigeria Printed 2013 ISBN: 978-058-434-X All Rights Reserved Printed by: ii BIO 308 COURSE GUIDE CONTENTS PAGE Introduction ……………………………………......................... iv What you will Learn from this Course …………………............ iv Course Aims ……………………………………………............ iv Course Objectives …………………………………………....... iv Working through this Course …………………………….......... v Course Materials ………………………………………….......... v Study Units ………………………………………………......... v Textbooks and References ………………………………........... vi Assessment ……………………………………………….......... vi End of Course Examination and Grading..................................... vi Course Marking Scheme................................................................ vii Presentation Schedule.................................................................... vii Tutor-Marked Assignment ……………………………….......... vii Tutors and Tutorials....................................................................... viii iii BIO 308 COURSE GUIDE INTRODUCTION BIO 308: Biogeography is a one-semester, 2 credit- hour course in Biology. It is a 300 level, second semester undergraduate course offered to students admitted in the School of Science and Technology, School of Education who are offering Biology or related programmes. The course guide tells you briefly what the course is all about, what course materials you will be using and how you can work your way through these materials. It gives you some guidance on your Tutor- Marked Assignments. There are Self-Assessment Exercises within the body of a unit and/or at the end of each unit.
  • Articles & Book Reviews

    Articles & Book Reviews

    Newsletter of the Colorado Native Plant Society ARTICLES & BOOK REVIEWS Marr Steinkamp Research: Pollination Biology of the Stream Orchid Alpine Cushion Plants in New Zealand Interview with Barbara Fahey, Native Plant Master® Program Founder Conservation Corner: White River Beardtongue How Lupines Talk to Bees Volume 38, No. 2 Summer 2014 Aquilegia: Newsletter of the Colorado Native Plant Society Dedicated to furthering the knowledge, appreciation, and conservation of native plants and habitats of Colorado through education, stewardship, and advocacy Volume 38 Number 2 Summer 2014 ISSN 2161-7317 (Online) - ISSN 2162-0865 (Print) Inside this issue News & Announcements................................................................................................ 3 Field Trips........................................................................................................................6 Articles Marr/Steinkamp Research: Pollination Biology of Epipactis gigantea........................9 How Lupines Talk to Bees...........................................................................................11 The Other Down Under: Exploring Alpine Cushion Plants in New Zealand...........14 The Native Plant Master® Program: An Interview with Barbara Fahey.....................16 Conservation Corner: White River Beardtongue......................................................... 13 Book & Media Reviews, Song........................................................................................19 Calendar......................................................................................................................
  • ARTHROPODA Subphylum Hexapoda Protura, Springtails, Diplura, and Insects

    ARTHROPODA Subphylum Hexapoda Protura, Springtails, Diplura, and Insects

    NINE Phylum ARTHROPODA SUBPHYLUM HEXAPODA Protura, springtails, Diplura, and insects ROD P. MACFARLANE, PETER A. MADDISON, IAN G. ANDREW, JOCELYN A. BERRY, PETER M. JOHNS, ROBERT J. B. HOARE, MARIE-CLAUDE LARIVIÈRE, PENELOPE GREENSLADE, ROSA C. HENDERSON, COURTenaY N. SMITHERS, RicarDO L. PALMA, JOHN B. WARD, ROBERT L. C. PILGRIM, DaVID R. TOWNS, IAN McLELLAN, DAVID A. J. TEULON, TERRY R. HITCHINGS, VICTOR F. EASTOP, NICHOLAS A. MARTIN, MURRAY J. FLETCHER, MARLON A. W. STUFKENS, PAMELA J. DALE, Daniel BURCKHARDT, THOMAS R. BUCKLEY, STEVEN A. TREWICK defining feature of the Hexapoda, as the name suggests, is six legs. Also, the body comprises a head, thorax, and abdomen. The number A of abdominal segments varies, however; there are only six in the Collembola (springtails), 9–12 in the Protura, and 10 in the Diplura, whereas in all other hexapods there are strictly 11. Insects are now regarded as comprising only those hexapods with 11 abdominal segments. Whereas crustaceans are the dominant group of arthropods in the sea, hexapods prevail on land, in numbers and biomass. Altogether, the Hexapoda constitutes the most diverse group of animals – the estimated number of described species worldwide is just over 900,000, with the beetles (order Coleoptera) comprising more than a third of these. Today, the Hexapoda is considered to contain four classes – the Insecta, and the Protura, Collembola, and Diplura. The latter three classes were formerly allied with the insect orders Archaeognatha (jumping bristletails) and Thysanura (silverfish) as the insect subclass Apterygota (‘wingless’). The Apterygota is now regarded as an artificial assemblage (Bitsch & Bitsch 2000).
  • Nzbotsoc No 104 June 2011

    Nzbotsoc No 104 June 2011

    NEW ZEALAND BOTANICAL SOCIETY NEWSLETTER NUMBER 104 June 2011 New Zealand Botanical Society President: Anthony Wright Secretary/Treasurer: Ewen Cameron Committee: Bruce Clarkson, Colin Webb, Carol West Address: c/- Canterbury Museum Rolleston Avenue CHRISTCHURCH 8013 Subscriptions The 2011 ordinary and institutional subscriptions are $25 (reduced to $18 if paid by the due date on the subscription invoice). The 2011 student subscription, available to full-time students, is $12 (reduced to $9 if paid by the due date on the subscription invoice). Back issues of the Newsletter are available at $7.00 each. Since 1986 the Newsletter has appeared quarterly in March, June, September and December. New subscriptions are always welcome and these, together with back issue orders, should be sent to the Secretary/Treasurer (address above). Subscriptions are due by 28 February each year for that calendar year. Existing subscribers are sent an invoice with the December Newsletter for the next years subscription which offers a reduction if this is paid by the due date. If you are in arrears with your subscription a reminder notice comes attached to each issue of the Newsletter. Deadline for next issue The deadline for the September 2011 issue is 25 August 2011. Please post contributions to: Lara Shepherd Allan Wilson Centre Massey University Private Bag 11222 Palmerston North Send email contributions to [email protected]. Files are preferably in MS Word, with suffix “.doc” or “.docx”, or saved as RTF or ASCII. Macintosh files can also be accepted. Graphics can be sent as TIF, JPG, or BMP files; please do not embed images into documents.
  • 080057-12.018.Pdf

    080057-12.018.Pdf

    1 noo11wnlltsndtad 5 puu tsrnbl.ru34r .tttj'o'l tunJu)ru1ruS lslnblltJ tr) '.sortDl "rJ$o-lwntDtuapaS HSTllcxpC D d(i^rllrl\ HITuos)rrj'J HJxe llanli\lC),t/ora S ' '(scrccds Jg d wnptDJlD) S t au u) Luntota)Dnir4r4,f;g rrllr.r1"^nyujclsalN lo tsc,t-qlnos € uotFl.tstt;t Lu,uJ P,'\'u l\. l Jrlrsr tllo'111.t,^ttutltptl.(ls serceds,\\eu oqJ erleJlsnvujelse^d lo acur^.ordlDcruElo{ uceurcrg aqt Jo t.utsr(I uounqqsv Z -^:llrcqull]{ cqt ol pelclJlsersI wnvtactp g sctcads,4ou eql eJrq,rsuorfereseql qloq ur rnccolsrnb1.rr:3 ttu.rottEuo1 S puc zrt,^\qcs O wntoqdoloLac wntyl{15 ltoluelurequoN }or{lrouJrl pur rrll-llsnv ujalse/i\ -iouor8cr trci:cqul; 1 :s^\olloJsu \rrlurlsnV urolsa/!\ puE urequou ur wntplJfla) snue8qnsr./r?p4{ls ur pezruSooor,rou eru sercedsue; '( ruuoJ sJedseuml H S :6t61 scurrfT lleilrC) snue8qns srql ur papJoJeJueeq e^uq fl pue I l Jo sjeqtUnueuosororq3 protduH rru8qse{rl-qsnrq atulrdrls 'uoDlsod e pu€ pero88ulelecuoc eql ol uonrsodles xaluoc eql uro{ unlnqrunJ e Jo luaue^crru 'urnrqturd,(r1 a,rrlrsucsaq1 ,{q lnq snsorolpe8urq a,rqrsues e fq tou paonpo.rd,{1rlrqotu urnruretsou,{3 esoqolS€ e^uq( I t :8061FErqplry{) snue8qnssrql Jo sraqrueruIIV €roqpaqucsaperr (eDocrrprt{tS) 'rqpllhl ( lFul'l) wntpuual Sqns ampu{lg ur 8ur3uo1cqlur1drc3fr.4.lo sorrads .,(?u ecrqJ uoJlJnpoJluI 'uxal JoJpepr^oJd sr ,{eI V uel ot snue?qnssrql ur u,{\oul serJedsJo J3qurnuplol oql Sur8uuq'rqplrt{ ( lpur1) wnlpuga) snueSqnsairrprl&g or 3uolcqXaql pelurlsnllrpuc peqrrrsap 'anNJaJn 'serceds er€ ,{llueuua) T ou,ro-1 lllotwUaa$ S pue wnlDJnlp S ullp4(lg uullvrlsnv
  • 1992 New Zealand Botanical Society President: Dr Eric Godley Secretary/Treasurer: Anthony Wright

    1992 New Zealand Botanical Society President: Dr Eric Godley Secretary/Treasurer: Anthony Wright

    NEW ZEALAND BOTANICAL SOCIETY NEWSLETTER NUMBER 28 JUNE 1992 New Zealand Botanical Society President: Dr Eric Godley Secretary/Treasurer: Anthony Wright Committee: Sarah Beadel, Ewen Cameron, Colin Webb, Carol West Address: New Zealand Botanical Society C/- Auckland Institute & Museum Private Bag 92018 AUCKLAND Subscriptions The 1992 ordinary and institutional subs are $14 (reduced to $10 if paid by the due date on the subscription invoice). The 1992 student sub, available to full-time students, is $7 (reduced to $5 if paid by the due date on the subscription invoice). Back issues of the Newsletter are available at $2.50 each - from Number 1 (August 1985) to Number 28 (June 1992). Since 1986 the Newsletter has appeared quarterly in March, June, September and December. New subscriptions are always welcome and these, together with back issue orders, should be sent to the Secretary/Treasurer (address above). Subscriptions are due by 28 February of each year for that calendar year. Existing subscribers are sent an invoice with the December Newsletter for the next year's subscription which offers a reduction if this is paid by the due date. If you are in arrears with your subscription a reminder notice comes attached to each issue of the Newsletter. Deadline for next issue The deadline for the September 1992 issue (Number 29) is 28 August 1992. Please forward contributions to: Ewen Cameron, Editor NZ Botanical Society Newsletter C/- Auckland Institute & Museum Private Bag 92018 AUCKLAND Cover illustration Mawhai (Sicyos australis) in the Cucurbitaceae. Drawn by Joanna Liddiard from a fresh vegetative specimen from Mangere, Auckland; flowering material from Cuvier Island herbarium specimen (AK 153760) and the close-up of the spine from West Island, Three Kings Islands herbarium specimen (AK 162592).
  • 583–584 Angiosperms 583 *Eudicots and Ceratophyllales

    583–584 Angiosperms 583 *Eudicots and Ceratophyllales

    583 583 > 583–584 Angiosperms These schedules are extensively revised, having been prepared with little reference to earlier editions. 583 *Eudicots and Ceratophyllales Subdivisions are added for eudicots and Ceratophyllales together, for eudicots alone Class here angiosperms (flowering plants), core eudicots For monocots, basal angiosperms, Chloranthales, magnoliids, see 584 See Manual at 583–585 vs. 600; also at 583–584; also at 583 vs. 582.13 .176 98 Mangrove swamp ecology Number built according to instructions under 583–588 Class here comprehensive works on mangroves For mangroves of a specific order or family, see the order or family, e.g., mangroves of family Combretaceae 583.73 .2 *Ceratophyllales Class here Ceratophyllaceae Class here hornworts > 583.3–583.9 Eudicots Class comprehensive works in 583 .3 *Ranunculales, Sabiaceae, Proteales, Trochodendrales, Buxales .34 *Ranunculales Including Berberidaceae, Eupteleaceae, Menispermaceae, Ranunculaceae Including aconites, anemones, barberries, buttercups, Christmas roses, clematises, columbines, delphiniums, hellebores, larkspurs, lesser celandine, mandrake, mayapple, mayflower, monkshoods, moonseeds, wolfsbanes For Fumariaceae, Papaveraceae, Pteridophyllaceae, see 583.35 See also 583.9593 for mandrakes of family Solanaceae .35 *Fumariaceae, Papaveraceae, Pteridophyllaceae Including bleeding hearts, bloodroot, celandines, Dutchman’s breeches, fumitories, poppies See also 583.34 for lesser celandine .37 *Sabiaceae * *Add as instructed under 583–588 1 583 Dewey Decimal Classification
  • Typification of Gnaphalium Collinum Var. Monocephalum (Gnaphalieae

    Typification of Gnaphalium Collinum Var. Monocephalum (Gnaphalieae

    C.Nuytsia Flann, 20: P.G. 1–5 Wilson (2010) & J.J. Wieringa, Typification of Gnaphalium collinum 1 Typification ofGnaphalium collinum var. monocephalum (Gnaphalieae: Asteraceae) and clarification of related material Christina Flann1, Paul G. Wilson2 and Jan J. Wieringa1 1Netherlands Centre for Biodiversity Naturalis (section NHN), Wageningen University Branch, Biosystematics Group, Generaal Foulkesweg 37, 6703BL Wageningen, The Netherlands 2Western Australian Herbarium, Department of Environment and Conservation, Locked Bag 104, Bentley Delivery Centre, Bentley, Western Australia 6983 Email: [email protected] Abstract Flann, C., Wilson, P.G. & Wieringa, J.J. Typification ofGnaphalium collinum var. monocephalum (Gnaphalieae: Asteraceae) and clarification of related material.Nuytsia 20: 1–5 (2010). The protologue of Gnaphalium collinum var. monocephalum Hook.f. cites three gatherings which are now considered to be referable to three different taxa known by the names Euchiton lateralis (C.J.Webb) Breitw. & J.M.Ward, Euchiton traversii (Hook.f.) Holub and Argyrotegium mackayi (Buchanan) J.M.Ward & Breitw. This has caused confusion regarding the typification and application of J.D.Hooker’s varietal name. This article resolves the uncertainty and provides a corrected synonymy for all the taxa involved. Introduction Recent taxonomic work in the genus Euchiton Cass. (Flann et al. 2008) has raised questions about the name Gnaphalium collinum var. monocephalum Hook.f. (1859) as there has been confusion regarding its application resulting from issues of typification (Drury 1972, Ward et al. 2003). The protologue included three gatherings which are now referred to three different taxa known as Euchiton lateralis (C.J.Webb) Breitw. & J.M.Ward, Euchiton traversii (Hook.f.) Holub and Argyrotegium mackayi (Buchanan) J.M.Ward & Breitw.
  • Phylogeny and Phylogenetic Nomenclature of the Campanulidae Based on an Expanded Sample of Genes and Taxa

    Phylogeny and Phylogenetic Nomenclature of the Campanulidae Based on an Expanded Sample of Genes and Taxa

    Systematic Botany (2010), 35(2): pp. 425–441 © Copyright 2010 by the American Society of Plant Taxonomists Phylogeny and Phylogenetic Nomenclature of the Campanulidae based on an Expanded Sample of Genes and Taxa David C. Tank 1,2,3 and Michael J. Donoghue 1 1 Peabody Museum of Natural History & Department of Ecology & Evolutionary Biology, Yale University, P. O. Box 208106, New Haven, Connecticut 06520 U. S. A. 2 Department of Forest Resources & Stillinger Herbarium, College of Natural Resources, University of Idaho, P. O. Box 441133, Moscow, Idaho 83844-1133 U. S. A. 3 Author for correspondence ( [email protected] ) Communicating Editor: Javier Francisco-Ortega Abstract— Previous attempts to resolve relationships among the primary lineages of Campanulidae (e.g. Apiales, Asterales, Dipsacales) have mostly been unconvincing, and the placement of a number of smaller groups (e.g. Bruniaceae, Columelliaceae, Escalloniaceae) remains uncertain. Here we build on a recent analysis of an incomplete data set that was assembled from the literature for a set of 50 campanulid taxa. To this data set we first added newly generated DNA sequence data for the same set of genes and taxa. Second, we sequenced three additional cpDNA coding regions (ca. 8,000 bp) for the same set of 50 campanulid taxa. Finally, we assembled the most comprehensive sample of cam- panulid diversity to date, including ca. 17,000 bp of cpDNA for 122 campanulid taxa and five outgroups. Simply filling in missing data in the 50-taxon data set (rendering it 94% complete) resulted in a topology that was similar to earlier studies, but with little additional resolution or confidence.
  • The European Alpine Seed Conservation and Research Network

    The European Alpine Seed Conservation and Research Network

    The International Newsletter of the Millennium Seed Bank Partnership August 2016 – January 2017 kew.org/msbp/samara ISSN 1475-8245 Issue: 30 View of Val Dosdé with Myosotis alpestris The European Alpine Seed Conservation and Research Network ELINOR BREMAN AND JONAS V. MUELLER (RBG Kew, UK), CHRISTIAN BERG AND PATRICK SCHWAGER (Karl-Franzens-Universitat Graz, Austria), BRIGITTA ERSCHBAMER, KONRAD PAGITZ AND VERA MARGREITER (Institute of Botany; University of Innsbruck, Austria), NOÉMIE FORT (CBNA, France), ANDREA MONDONI, THOMAS ABELI, FRANCESCO PORRO AND GRAZIANO ROSSI (Dipartimento di Scienze della Terra e dell’Ambiente; Universita degli studi di Pavia, Italy), CATHERINE LAMBELET-HAUETER, JACQUELINE DÉTRAZ- Photo: Dr Andrea Mondoni Andrea Dr Photo: MÉROZ AND FLORIAN MOMBRIAL (Conservatoire et Jardin Botaniques de la Ville de Genève, Switzerland). The European Alps are home to nearly 4,500 taxa of vascular plants, and have been recognised as one of 24 centres of plant diversity in Europe. While species richness decreases with increasing elevation, the proportion of endemic species increases – of the 501 endemic taxa in the European Alps, 431 occur in subalpine to nival belts. he varied geology of the pre and they are converting to shrub land and forest awareness of its increasing vulnerability. inner Alps, extreme temperature with reduced species diversity. Conversely, The Alpine Seed Conservation and Research T fluctuations at altitude, exposure to over-grazing in some areas (notably by Network currently brings together five plant high levels of UV radiation and short growing sheep) is leading to eutrophication and a science institutions across the Alps, housed season mean that the majority of alpine loss of species adapted to low nutrient at leading universities and botanic gardens: species are highly adapted to their harsh levels.
  • Life-Forms of Terrestrial 'Flowering Plants

    Life-Forms of Terrestrial 'Flowering Plants

    ACTA PHYTOGEOGRAPHICA SUECICA EDIDJT SVENSKA VAXTGEOGRAFISKA SALLSKAPET m:1 LIFE-FORMS OF TERRESTRIAL ' FLOWERING PLANTS I BY G. EINAR Du RIETZ UPPSALA 1931 ALMQVIST & WIKSELLS BOKTRYCKERI AB ' ACTA PHYTOGEOGRAPHICA SUECICA. III. LIFE-FORMS OF TERRESTRIAL FLOWERING PLANTS BY G. EINAR DU RIETZ PRINTED WITH CONTRIBUTION FH.OM LA :\GMAN S KA I{ U LTU HFON DEN UPPSALA 193 1 ALMQVIST & WIKSELLS BOK'l'RYCKERI-A.-B. Preface. This work is the result of studies carried out during the last twelve years. The field-studies have been made partly in various parts of Scandinavia (Sweden and Norway), partly during a year's work in New Zealand and .Australia in 1926-1927 as well as during shorter visits to various parts of Central and Western Europe, North America, and Java. The material collected in the field has been worked up in the Plant-Biological Institution of Upsala Uni­ versity. The rich life-form collections of this institution have also been utilized as much as possible. I wish to express my deep gratitude to all those frien�s in various countries who have supported my work in one way or another - they are too many to be enumerated here. l have tried to bring the names of the plants mentioned as much as possible into accordance with the following generally known :florjstic handbooks : For Scandinavia Ho LMBERG 1922-1926, and, for the groups not treated there, LIND- 1\IAN 1926, for Central Europe HEGI 1908--1931, for the eastern part of North .America RoBINSON and FF.RNALD 1908, for Java KooR DERS 191 1-1912, for N�w South Wales MooRE and BE T C H E 1893, for the rest of Australia BENTHAM 1863- 1878, and for New Zealand CHEESEMAN 1925.