DOCSLIB.ORG

Republika Slovenija Ustavno Sodišče

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Republika Slovenija Ustavno Sodišče REPUBLIKA SLOVENIJA USTAVNO SODIŠČE U-I-119/98 17.4.1998 DECISION At a session held on 17 April 1998, in a proceeding for assessing constitutionality and legality commenced on the initiative of the local communities of Benedikt, Cerkvenjak, Destrnik, Dobje, Horjul, Kamna Gorica, Kropa, Lenart, Ljubno, Mirna Peč, Nova Gorica, Podlehnik, Podnart, Polana, Solkan, Srednja Dobrava, Sveta Ana, Sveti Andraţ, Sveti Jurij, Sveta Trojica, Šmarjeta, Trzin, Voličina, Ţetale and Ţirovnica, Initiative committee of the village of Globoka, Urban municipality of Nova Gorica, Municipality of Lenart, Municipality of Nazarje and others, the Constitutional Court reached the following decision: 1. It is in conflict with the Constitution that the Decree on holding referendums and determining referendum regions for founding municipalities and for determining or changing their regions and holding referendums for changing the name and seats of municipalities (Official Gazette RS, no. 21/98) does not contain provisions on holding a referendum in the region of the municipality of Destrnik - Trnovska vas in relation to the seat of the municipality. The National Assembly must rectify this conflict with the Constitution not later than 20 May 1998 such that a referendum is held in the region of Destrnik - Trnovska vas. 2. It is in conflict with the Constitution that the Decree does not contain provisions on holding a referendum in the region of the settlement of Prihova in relation to separation from the municipality of Mozirje and inclusion in the municipality of Nazarje. The National Assembly must rectify this conflict with the Constitution not later than 20 May such that a referendum is held in the appropriate regions. 3. It is in conflict with the Constitution that the Decree does not contain provisions on holding a referendum on separating parts of the municipalities into independent municipalities in the following regions: Benedikt, Cerkvenjak, Lenart, Sveta Ana v Slovenskih Goricah, Sveti Jurij v Slovenskih Goricah, Sveta Trojica v Slovenskih Gorica, Voličina, Sveti Andraţ v Slovenskih Goricah, Velika Polana, Šmarjeta, Mirna Peč, Horjul, Trzin, Ţirovnica, Lipnica, Podlehnik, Ţetale and Dobje. The National Assembly must rectify this conflict not later than 20 May 1998, such that it adopts a decree whereby a referendum will be held in the appropriate regions. 4. Point I/23 of the Decrees is not in conflict with the Constitution if it is interpreted such that in the referendum on founding municipalities and for changing their regions which is called for Sunday, 19 April 1998, in the referendum regions under point I/23 of the cited decree, the referendum result is established individually for the region of the settlement of Globoka. 5. Point I/7 of the Decree is not in conflict with the Constitution. 6. The parts of the initiative cited in the introduction to this decision which refer to the Procedure for Founding Municipalities and for Determining Their Regions (Official Gazette RS, no. 44/96), shall be separated from case no. U-I-119/98 and dealt with individually. Reasoning A. 1. The local community of Destrnik impugns the Decree on holding referendums and determining referendum regions for founding municipalities and for determining or changing their regions and 2 holding referendums for changing the name and seats of municipalities (Official Gazette RS, no. 21/98 - hereinafter: OdlRR), because the National Assembly did not with it call a referendum on changing the seat of the municipality of Destrnik - Trnovska vas such that it would become Destrnik instead of Trnovska vas. The initiator refers in this to the decision of the Constitutional Court U-I-304/94 (OdlUS IV, 114). The initiative committee of the village of Globoka of the municipality of Ljutomer and Franjo Kardinar impugn OdlRR because it classifies the settlement of Globoka in the referendum region for the founding of an independent municipality of Razkriţje. They assert that the classification of this settlement in the municipality of Razkriţje is in conflict with the will of the inhabitants of this settlement and that the settlement is more connected with Ljutomer than with Razkriţje. They propose that the Constitutional Court order a separate finding of the result of voting in the region of the settlement of Globoka. The urban municipality of Nova Gorica, local community Nova Gorica and local community Solkan impugn OdlRR because it determines referendum regions for founding an independent municipality of Šempeter - Vrtojba. The initiators state that by the founding of this municipality the town is unconstitutionally divided into a number of municipalities and that it loses some of the conditions for an urban municipality (e.g., a hospital). They state that Šempeter and Vrtojba are not in fact independent settlements, but part of the urban region and the urban decree on planning regulation conditions in the wider urban region of Nova Gorica of 1993 considers Šempeter and Vrtojba to be part of the wider urban region of Nova Gorica. They also refer to material of the Institute of Geography of the University of Ljubljana "Criteria for defining towns in Slovenia" which in the list of towns with suburbs enumerates in the context of the town of Nova Gorica also Šempeter and Vrtojba. The municipality of Nazarje and some other initiators impugn the finding resolution of the National Assembly on the fact that specific proposals for founding municipalities and changing their regions do not meet the constitutional and statutory conditions (Resolution no. 005-01/95- 4/15 of 19.3.1998) in the part which refers to the finding that the proposal for separating parts of the municipality of Mozirje (settlement of Prihova) and its inclusion in the municipality of Nazarje do not meet the statutory conditions. 2. Other initiators impugn either the cited finding resolution of the National Assembly or OdlRR because it does not contain provisions on holding a referendum in specific regions. The Constitutional Court considered all the initiatives in which the initiators claim that a referendum should have been called on the founding of a municipality in a specific region (including those with which the initiators impugn the cited resolution of the National Assembly) to be initiatives for a judgement of the constitutionality and legality of OdlRR. The initiators claim that the National Assembly behaved arbitrarily in deciding in which regions a referendum on founding a municipality would be held. Some state that their regions in which the National Assembly did not hold a referendum for founding a municipality meet the conditions under article 13 of the Local Government Act (Official Gazette RS, no. 72/93, 6/94 - odl. US, 45/94 - odl.US. 57/94, 14/95, 20/95 - odl.US, 63/95, 73/95 - odl.US, 9/96 - odl.US, 44/96 - odl.US, 26/97, 70/97 and 10/98 - hereinafter: ZLS) and that in relation to the founding of a municipality in these regions, reasons under the second paragraph of article 13a. ZLS are given. Numerous initiators assert that the National Assembly dealt with similar proposals unequally, so that it called a referendum in regions which, in relation to fulfilling the conditions under articles 13 and 13a ZLS, are comparable with regions in relation to which it rejected a proposal or found that constitutional and legal conditions for the founding of a municipality were not met. 3. Some of the initiators under the previous point claim that the National Assembly did not decide at all on their proposal for holding a referendum (these are proposals for the holding of a referendum in the following regions: Ţirovnica, Lipnica, Dobje, Ţetale and Podlehnik), although they submitted initiatives or applications for the founding of a municipality in good time. B. - I. 4. The local community of Destrnik proposed the implementation of a referendum on changing the seat of the municipality. In their introductory definitions of proposals for introducing a procedure for founding a municipality or changing its region, of 3.7.1997, the Government supported the proposal, but in the opinion on proposals of 15.1.1998, it withdrew its support. In the meantime, namely, the Amending and Supplementing ZLS Act had been adopted, by which measures for determining the 3 seat of a municipality were set. The second, third, fourth and fifth paragraphs of the amended article 9 ZLS determine: "The Act shall also determine the seat of a municipality. The will of the inhabitants of settlements included in the municipality on the name and seat of the municipality or its change shall be established by referendum. The name of the municipality shall be determined according to the name of the central or other settlement in the municipality or by a district name. The name of a municipality may consist of the names of a number of settlements in the municipality. The name of the municipality must differ from the name of other municipalities. The central settlement shall normally be decided as the seat of the municipality. In determining the name and seat of a municipality it is necessary to bear in mind historical and traffic aspects and existing general regional characteristics." 5. The Government withdrew support for the proposal for carrying out a referendum on the seat of the municipality of Destrnik- Trnovska vas with the reasoning that Trnovska vas better matched the definition of the central settlement. This finding is not sufficient reason for rejecting the proposal for holding a referendum on the question. In case no. U-I-304/94 (OdlUS IV, 114), the Constitutional Court found conflict with the Constitution of articles 2 and 3 of the Founding of Municipalities and Determining Their Regions Act, because the will of the inhabitants was not established in relation to the name and seat of municipalities. In the reasoning, it stressed that it was not necessary in order to rectify the conflict to hold a referendum in all municipalities, but only in those in which the name and (or) seat was disputed - among these it also cited the municipality of Destrnik - Trnovska vas.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • "Pepco" in Ljutomer 850.000€ Shopping Center | Ljutomer, Pomurska, Slovenia Property Price
    +386 40 289 800 [email protected] www.futu-re.com Shop with "Pepco" in Ljutomer 850.000€ Shopping center | Ljutomer, Pomurska, Slovenia property price Profitability Rental flow / year Rental flow / month Prospective yield Tenant area 5,80% 49.410€ 4.117,50€ 9,13% 457,50m2 Net size Build Tenants 457,50m2 2017 1 Property details In the city of Ljutomer, a store with a tenant is offered for sale - Pepco is a network of inexpensive supermarkets in Europe that offer their visitors: women's and men's clothing, underwear, children's clothing, accessories and toys for children, household goods and interior design. The area of the commercial premises is 457,5 m2. The shopping center is a new one and was commissioned in August 2017. The shopping center is located next to SPAR and LIDL shopping centers, which provides it with a large influx of customers. 1 / 4 One-story building with a supporting structure in the form of a metal frame, insulated sandwich panels, concrete foundation. Outdoor parking near the building. Tenants Pepco Pepco is a chain of textiles and home goods stores. Since 2004, the company has become part of Pepkor Holding, which is included in Steinhoff International Holdings Limited, a group that owns 42 retail brands in 44 countries in Europe, Africa and Australia. As of 2017 - 1243 stores. Tenant area Credit estimate Rental contract Possibility of refusal 457,50m2 High 5 years только после 28.09.2024 Investment prediction Large tenants in the neighborhood. Fresh lease agreement. Good location of the shopping area.
    [Show full text]
  • Sustainable Commuting
    1 2 CONTENT INTRODUCTION . 7 1. Usual problems connected with the employees’ mobility ...................................8 2. The answer: Mobility management .................................................9 4. Project MOVECIT ............................................................10 5. Company or city hall - what is the difference? .........................................11 WHAT YOU NEED TO KNOW BEFORE YOU START . 13 6. A few steps that needs to be taken ................................................13 6.1. Get familiar with the terminology ..............................................13 6.2. Be invested .............................................................13 6.3. Involve your employees and colleagues ...........................................13 6.4. Crack the books ..........................................................15 6.5. Legislation can help .......................................................15 HOW TO CREATE A MOBILITY PLAN? . 16 7. Preparation phase ...........................................................18 7.1. Support is needed .........................................................18 7.2. Team up! ...............................................................18 7.3. Involve the stakeholders. 19 8. Analytical phase .............................................................20 8.1. Travel behaviour survey - know your nuts and bolts. 21 8.1.1. A goal of travel survey ...................................................22 8.1.2. Survey advocate .......................................................22
    [Show full text]
  • Summary of Report on Impacts on Environment
    SUMMARY OF REPORT ON IMPACTS ON ENVIRONMENT FOR ELECTRIFICATION, RECONSTRUCTION AND UPGRADING OF THE RAILWAY LINE PRAGERSKO - HODOŠ Maribor, November 2010 (updated September 2012) 1 SUMMARY FOR PUBLIC 1.1 BASIC DATA ON THE HOLDER OF ACTIVITY AND REPORT ON IMPACTS ON ENVIRONMENT Title of the measure: Electrification, reconstruction and upgrading of the railway line from Pragersko to Hodoš Purpose: It deals with electrification, reconstruction and upgrading of the existing railway line from Pragersko to Hodoš, which runs partially on the line No. 40 Pragersko-Središče- state border with the Republic of Croatia on the section from Pragersko to Ormož and on the line No. 41 Ormož-Murska Sobota-Hodoš – state border with the Republic of Hungary. The electrification of the 109 km of the existing railway line means the continuation of the development of the public railway infrastructure in the South-East part of Slovenia and the modernisation of the Vth traffic corridor. The foreseen measures of electrification (placing of poles for the supply) will run on the existing alignment. To assure the technical standards the line will be reconstructed on five places, namely in front of Ormož, in Pavlovci and Ivanjkovci as well as on stations Ptuj and Hodoš. Within electrification also the construction of five electrical substations is foreseen for the supply of traction with electricity. Holder: The holder of the activity is Republic of Slovenia, Ministry of Transport, Agency of the Republic of Slovenia for the management of public railway infrastructure investment, Kopitarjeva 5, Maribor. Responsible person of Maksimiljan Dolinšek, u.d.i.e. the holder: Valid spatial National spatial plan for electrification and reconstruction of the railway document: line Pragersko–Hodoš (Official Gazette RS, No.
    [Show full text]
  • Development of Sustainable Mobility Management in European Cities
    DEVELOPMENT OF SUSTAINABLE MOBILITY MANAGEMENT IN EUROPEAN CITIES THE HANDBOOK ON BEST PRACTICES DEVELOPMENT OF SUSTAINABLE MOBILITY MANAGEMENT IN EUROPEAN CITIES THE HANDBOOK ON BEST PRACTICES TABLE OF CONTENT PREFACE ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 4 DEMO-EC PROJECT ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 4 PARTNERS AND REGIONS ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 5 BEHAVIOUR CHANGE .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 9 1.1. GERMANY: CITY CYCLING IN LEIPZIG ............................................................................................................................................................................................. 10 1.2. SPAIN: THE BICYCLE MASTER PLAN IN ZARAGOZA ............................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Enhanced Programmes to Encourage SUMP in Countries and Regions
    Ref. Ares(2019)5703557 - 11/09/2019 w Summary of new / enhanced programmes to encourage SUMP in PROSPERITY countries and regions Deliverable No.: D3.3 Project Acronym: PROSPERITY Full Title: Prosperity through innovation and promotion of Sustainable Urban Mobility Plans Grant Agreement No.: 690636 Workpackage/Measure No.: WP3 Workpackage/ Measure Title: Policy and SUMP programmes Responsible Author(s): Aljaž Plevnik (UIRS), Mojca Balant (UIRS), Luka Mladenovič (UIRS), Andraž Hudoklin (UIRS), Responsible Co-Author(s): Tom Rye (ENU), Suzanne Meade (ENU) Date: August 2019 Status: Final Dissemination level: Project Coordinator D3.3 – Summary of new / enhanced programmes to encourage SUMP in PROSPERITY countries and regions August 2019 About CIVITAS PROSPERTITY Supporting local and national authorities to improve the quality and uptake of Sustainable Urban Mobility Plans CIVITAS PROSPERITY is a 3-year project, started in September 2016 and supported by the European Commission within the H2020 programme. It aims to enable and create a culture shift in government agencies and local authorities to support Sustainable Urban Mobility Plans (SUMPs). The project focuses on promoting and supporting a broad take-up of SUMPs especially in countries / regions and cities where the take up is so far so low. It aims to achieve this through providing mechanisms and tools for national / regional agencies to take a leading role in the development of SUMPs; building professional capacity through peer-to-peer exchange programmes and tailor-made training programmes on various aspects of SUMPs and/or innovative approaches in sustainable urban mobility. Contact: Robert PRESSL | Austrian Mobility Research FGM-AMOR | [email protected] www.sump-network.eu CIVITAS PROSPERITY is a member of the European Platform on Sustainable Urban Mobility Plans.
    [Show full text]
  • 2. Akademsko Gospodarski Kongres - AEC 2015 Z Mednarodno Konferenco »Povezujemo Znanja
    2. Akademsko gospodarski kongres - AEC 2015 z mednarodno konferenco »Povezujemo znanja. Povezujte jih z nami.« The 2nd Academic Economic Congress AEC 2015 with International Conference »Connecting knowledge. Connect it with us.« Zbornik povzetkov prispevkov konference ter predstavitev prejemnikov priznanj in novih Ambasadorjev znanja Conference Proceedings Abstracts and Presentation of Awards Recipients and New Ambassadors of Knowledge Slovenija, Brdo pri Kranju, 3.- 4. junij 2015 2. Akademsko gospodarski kongres - AEC 2015 z mednarodno konferenco »Povezujemo znanja. Povezujte jih z nami.« Zbornik povzetkov prispevkov konference ter predstavitev prejemnikov priznanj in novih Ambasadorjev znanja 2nd Academic Economic Congress - AEC 2015 with International Conference »Connecting knowledge. Connect it with us.« Conference Proceedings Abstracts and Presentation of Awards Recipients and New Ambassadors of Knowledge Brdo pri Kranju, 3. - 4. junij 2015 Naslov / Title 2. Akademsko gospodarski kongres - AEC 2015 z mednarodno konferenco »Povezujemo znanja. Povezujte jih z nami.« Zbornik povzetkov prispevkov konference ter predstavitev prejemnikov priznanj in novih Ambasadorjev znanja 2nd Academic Economic Congress – AEC 2015 with International Conference »Connecting knowledge. Connect it with us.« Conference Proceedings Abstracts and Presentation of Awards Recipients and New Ambassadors of Knowledge Prispevki avtorjev v celoti so objavljeni na spletni strani AEC kongresa: www.aecongress.eu Urednica / Editor: Metka Neţič Programski in uredniški
    [Show full text]
  • A Model of Comprehensive Assessment of Derelict Land As a Support for Sustainable Spatial and Development Planning in Slovenia
    PAPERS Dela 48 ● 2017 ● 33–59 A MODEL OF COMPREHENSIVE ASSESSMENT OF DERELICT LAND AS A SUPPORT FOR SUSTAINABLE SPATIAL AND DEVELOPMENT PLANNING IN SLOVENIA Barbara Lampič*, PhD., Simon Kušar*, PhD., Alma Zavodnik Lamovšek**, PhD. *Department of Geography, Faculty of Arts, University of Ljubljana, Aškerčeva 2, SI-1000 Ljubljana **Chair of Spatial Planning, Department of Geodetic Engineering, Faculty of Civil and Geodetic Engineering, University of Ljubljana, Jamova 2, SI-1000 Ljubljana e-mail: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] Original scientific article COBISS 1.01 DOI: 10.4312/dela.48.2.5-59 Abstract This paper investigates the characteristics of functionally derelict areas in Slovenia, criteria for their identification, typology and arguments for further monitoring, and regular updating of this new spatial and data layer. Both specifying the precise location and knowledge of characteristics of derelict areas, i.e. brownfields, are an important step towards sustainable planning and placement of activities. In 2017, we recorded 1081 functionally derelict areas in Slovenia in a total area of 3423 ha, with a prevalence of areas of industrial activities. Keywords: functional derelict area (FDA), records, identification criteria, typology, monitoring, spatial planning, sustainable development 1 INTRODUCTION The rapid spatial development dynamics is strongly affected by increasingly fast so­ cial and economic changes. On the one hand, we are faced with increasing requirements of investors for new areas to develop activities and, on the other hand, the increasing dynamics in suspending the already established activities, which leads to various types of degradation, particularly physical deterioration of space.
    [Show full text]
  • Implementation Manual
    MOBILNOSTNI NAČRT OBČINE LJUTOMER D.T.3.2.2 01 2018 Vsebina 1. Povzetek / Summary ................................................................................. 2 2. Uvod ..................................................................................................... 4 2.1. Projekt MOVECIT ................................................................................... 4 2.2. Občina Ljutomer ................................................................................... 4 2.3. Priprava Mobilnostnega načrta .................................................................. 6 3. Mobilnostni koncept ................................................................................. 8 3.1. Poslanstvo, zaveza in sodelovanje ............................................................. 8 3.2. Namen in specifični cilji .......................................................................... 8 4. Analiza trenutnega stanja ......................................................................... 12 4.1. Dostopnost občine ................................................................................ 12 4.2. Potovalne navade zaposlenih .................................................................. 21 4.2.1. Osnovni vzorci potovanja – poročilo o modalni razporeditvi ......................... 21 4.2.2. Razlogi za izbiro posameznega načina potovanja ....................................... 24 4.2.3. Pripravljenost na spremembe za trajnostne načine ................................... 25 4.2.4. Zahtevani ukrepi ..............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • National Report on Urban Development – HABITAT III
    National Report on Urban Development – HABITAT III NATIONAL REPORT ON URBAN DEVELOPMENT – HABITAT III Publication data Published by: Ministry of the Environment and Spatial Planning, Spatial Planning, Construction and Housing Directorate Edited by: mag. Ina Šuklje Erjavec mag. Tomaž Miklavčič mag. Aša Rogelj Zala Jerman Authors of individual sections: Dr. Vlasta Vodeb Dr. Luka Mladenovič Dr. Matej Nikšič Boštjan Cotič mag. Ina Šuklje Erjavec Sergeja Praper mag . Andrej Gulič Dr. Richard Sendi Urban Planning Institute of the Republic of Slovenia mag. Tomaž Miklavčič Gregor Robič Nina Uršič Ministry of the Environment and Spatial Planning; Spatial Planning, Construction and Housing Directorate Translation to English: Doris Sodja, PSD Proofreading: Philip Burt Ljubljana, September 2016 The opinions and views expressed in the text do not necessarily represent the official opinions and views of the Ministry of the Environment and Spatial Planning. The border between the Republic of Slovenia and the Republic of Croatia is not fixed and is subject to arbitration. The content and presentations in the National Report on Urban Development – HABITAT III refer to various documents; however, the latter do not represent the actual state border and do not prejudge its determination or indication. National Report on Urban Development – HABITAT III National Report on Urban Development – HABITAT III Preface At the global and European level, most of the population, economic activities, social and cultural interaction s , environmental and social problems are nowadays concentrated in cities. Therefore, greater emphasis is put on the appropriate development of cities to achieve sustainable development, reduce impacts on the environment and achieve welfare for all. To respond appropriately to the challenges posed by cities, we must initially identify these challenges.
    [Show full text]
  • Transformation of the Jeruzalem Hills Cultural Landscape with Modern
    57-2_Special issue_acta49-1.qxd 5.5.2017 10:23 Page 149 Acta geographica Slovenica, 57-2, 2017, 149–162 TRANSFORMATION OF THE JERUZALEM HILLS CULTURAL LANDSCAPE WITH MODERN VINEYARD TERRACES Primož Pipan, Žiga Kokalj MATEVŽ LENARČIČ MATEVŽ The dimensions, form, and inclination of terrace platforms and slopes are completely adapted to the terrain, steepness, and lithological and pedological conditions. Terrace access also depends on these. 57-2_Special issue_acta49-1.qxd 5.5.2017 10:23 Page 150 Primož Pipan, Žiga Kokalj, Transformation of the Jeruzalem Hills cultural landscape with modern vineyard terraces Transformation of the Jeruzalem Hills cultural landscape with modern vineyard terraces DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3986/AGS.4629 UDC: 911.53:631.613(497.412) COBISS: 1.01 ABSTRACT: The terraced landscape in the Jeruzalem Hills is the result of specific socioeconomic condi- tions under communism, and now its appearance is drastically changing for the second time in the last fifty years. This article examines the creation of the new landscape layer of modern cultivated terraces and studies their disappearance and the return to a condition similar to the original state. The analysis is based on interviews and visual interpretation of aerial laser scanning (lidar) data. It focuses on the state of the landscape before terracing, the creation of terraces and formation of a terraced landscape, and its most recent transformation into slopes without terraces. It is determined that, despite the recognized aesthet- ic value of terraces, legal protection in the form of a nature park has not impacted their preservation because 56% of them have already been leveled.
    [Show full text]
  • Prehrana, Gibanje in Zdravje«
    PROGRAM EKOŠOLA ZBORNIK REFERATOV VRTCEV PREDSTAVLJENIH NA MEDNARODNI KONFERENCI »PREHRANA, GIBANJE IN ZDRAVJE« Radenci, 9. maj 2019 UVOD ...................................................................................................................................... 5 VESELJE OB GIBALNIH DEJAVNOSTIH IN UŽIVANJE V ZDRAVI PREHRANI ŽE V PRVEM STAROSTNEM OBDOBJU ......................................................................................................... 6 ZDRAV NAČIN ŽIVLJENJA ...................................................................................................... 16 JEŽEK, KAM PA KAM? ........................................................................................................... 19 LONČEK KUHAJ ..................................................................................................................... 23 HRANA, GIBANJE IN ZDRAVJE SKOZI INTEGRACIJSKE PROGRAMSKE AKTIVNOSTI OD VRTCA, OSNOVNE ŠOLE, SREDNJE ŠOLE DO ZDRAVILIŠČA RADENCI ................................................ 26 FIT – IGRALNICA PLEZALNICA ............................................................................................... 30 V PLANINSKI RAJ ................................................................................................................... 33 PO ZDRAVJE V NARAVO – Z GIBANJEM IN ZDRAVO PREHRANO .......................................... 37 HRANA NAS ZDRUŽUJE IN POVEZUJE ................................................................................... 40 ZDRAV NAČIN PRAZNOVANJA ROJSTNEGA DNE
    [Show full text]
  • 31/2003, Uradne Objave
    Uradni list Republike Slovenije Uradne objave Internet: http://www.uradni-list.si e-pošta: [email protected] Št. Ljubljana, petek ISSN 1318-9182 Leto XIII 31 28. 3. 2003 matiko, Nikola Janjić (Nikola.Janjic@sodi- slednjih 12 mesecih: obvoznica Kosta- sce.si). njevica na cesti R2-419/1205 Šentjer- Javna naročila 7. Morebitne druge informacije o načr- nej–Križaj od km 0.000 do km 0.548. tovanih naročilih: / 4. Kraj izvedbe: Kostanjevica. po Zakonu 8. Datum odposlanja zahteve za obja- 5. Ocenjeni datum začetka javnega na- vo: 18. 3. 2003. ročila, če je določen: april 2003. o javnih naročilih Vrhovno sodišče RS 6. Naslov službe in oseba, od katere Center za informatiko se lahko zahteva dodatne informacije: Mi- (ZJN-1) nistrstvo za promet, Direkcija RS za ceste, Št. 184/03 Ob-90802 Irena Šrot, univ. dipl. inž. grad. 1. Naročnik: Klinični center Ljubljana. 7. Morebitne druge informacije o načr- 2. Naslov naročnika: Klinični center Ljub- tovanih naročilih: / ZJN-11 ljana, Zaloška cesta 2, 1000 Ljubljana,. 8. Datum odposlanja zahteve za obja- 3. Vrsta, količina blaga, gradenj ali sto- vo: 21. 3. 2003. Zahteva za objavo ritev, ki bo predvidoma naročeno v na- Direkcija RS za ceste predhodnega razpisa slednjih 12 mesecih: nakup koronarnih stentov. Št. 15/03 Ob-90866 Na podlagi 66. in 67. člena Zakona o 4. Kraj dobave: Klinični center Ljubjana. 1. Naročnik: Ministrstvo za promet - Di- javnih naročilih naročamo objavo 5. Ocenjeni datum začetka javnega na- rekcija RS za ceste. predhodnega razpisa ročila, če je določen: v mesecu aprilu 2003. 2. Naslov naročnika: Tržaška 19, 1000 6.
    [Show full text]