Enhanced Programmes to Encourage SUMP in Countries and Regions
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Ref. Ares(2019)5703557 - 11/09/2019 w Summary of new / enhanced programmes to encourage SUMP in PROSPERITY countries and regions Deliverable No.: D3.3 Project Acronym: PROSPERITY Full Title: Prosperity through innovation and promotion of Sustainable Urban Mobility Plans Grant Agreement No.: 690636 Workpackage/Measure No.: WP3 Workpackage/ Measure Title: Policy and SUMP programmes Responsible Author(s): Aljaž Plevnik (UIRS), Mojca Balant (UIRS), Luka Mladenovič (UIRS), Andraž Hudoklin (UIRS), Responsible Co-Author(s): Tom Rye (ENU), Suzanne Meade (ENU) Date: August 2019 Status: Final Dissemination level: Project Coordinator D3.3 – Summary of new / enhanced programmes to encourage SUMP in PROSPERITY countries and regions August 2019 About CIVITAS PROSPERTITY Supporting local and national authorities to improve the quality and uptake of Sustainable Urban Mobility Plans CIVITAS PROSPERITY is a 3-year project, started in September 2016 and supported by the European Commission within the H2020 programme. It aims to enable and create a culture shift in government agencies and local authorities to support Sustainable Urban Mobility Plans (SUMPs). The project focuses on promoting and supporting a broad take-up of SUMPs especially in countries / regions and cities where the take up is so far so low. It aims to achieve this through providing mechanisms and tools for national / regional agencies to take a leading role in the development of SUMPs; building professional capacity through peer-to-peer exchange programmes and tailor-made training programmes on various aspects of SUMPs and/or innovative approaches in sustainable urban mobility. Contact: Robert PRESSL | Austrian Mobility Research FGM-AMOR | [email protected] www.sump-network.eu CIVITAS PROSPERITY is a member of the European Platform on Sustainable Urban Mobility Plans. 2 / 44 D3.3 – Summary of new / enhanced programmes to encourage SUMP in PROSPERITY countries and regions August 2019 Project Partners Organisation Country Abbreviation Forschungsgesellschaft Mobilität Austrian Mobility Research AT FGM Edinburgh Napier University UK ENU Urban Planning Institute of the Republic of Slovenia SI UIRS Cities on the Move RO CiMO Mobilissimus Ltd. HU Mobi Mobiel 21 BE M21 German Institute of Urban Affairs DE DIFU SMG EKSPERT PL SMG Sustainable Development Civil Society Assoc. BG CSDCS Environmental Centre for Administration and Technology LT ECAT Grupo de Estudios y Alternativas 21, S.L. ES GEA 21 Instituto da Mobilidade e dos Transportes, I.P. PL IMT Centrum Dopravniho Vyzkumu v.v.i. CZ CDV Stratagem Energy Ltd CY STE City of Koprivnica HR Koprivnica TRT Trasporti e Territorio IT TRT City of Lisbon PT Lisbon City of Limassol CY Limassol Municipality of Jonava LT Jonova City of Kassel DE Kassel City of Dubrovnik HR Dubrovnik Municipality of Ljutomer SI Ljutomer Municipality of Hradec Kralove CZ Kralove Municipality of Fagaras RO Fagaras City of Katowice PL Katowice City of Varna BG Varna City of Szeged HU Szeged 3 / 44 D3.3 – Summary of new / enhanced programmes to encourage SUMP in PROSPERITY countries and regions August 2019 Document History Date Person Action Status Diss. Level Aljaž Plevnik, Luka 15.8.2019 Mladenovič, Andraž For review Draft PC Hudoklin (all UIRS) Suzanne Meade 29.8.2019 Quality Check Final PC (ENU) Status: Draft, Final, Approved, and Submitted (to European Commission). Dissemination Level: PC=Project Coordinator, SC=Site Coordinator, TC=Technical Coordinator, EM=Evaluation Manager. Disclaimer CIVITAS PROSPERITY has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No 690636. 4 / 44 D3.3 – Summary of new / enhanced programmes to encourage SUMP in PROSPERITY countries and regions August 2019 Contents 1 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................. 7 2 STATUS OF NATIONAL SUMP SUPPORT PROGRAMMES BEFORE PROSPERITY PROJECT 9 2.1 INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................................... 9 2.2 METHODOLOGY ......................................................................................................................... 9 2.3 STATUS OF NATIONAL SUMP SUPPORT PROGRAMMES IN 2017 .................................................. 11 2.4 STATUS OF FIVE MAIN ELEMENTS OF NATIONAL SUMP SUPPORT PROGRAMMES IN 2017 ............. 14 3 DEVELOPMENT OR RENEWAL OF NATIONAL SUMP SUPPORT PROGRAMMES .............. 28 3.1 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................ 28 3.2 METHODOLOGY ....................................................................................................................... 28 3.3 RESULTS OF NSSP DEVELOPMENT ........................................................................................... 28 4 CONCLUSIONS ............................................................................................................................ 41 5 ANNEXES ..................................................................................................................................... 43 5.1 ANNEX 1: NATIONAL/REGIONAL SUMP PROGRAMME CONTENT GUIDELINES FOR PARTNERS ...... 44 5.2 ANNEX 2: NSSP FOR BELGIUM – BRUSSELS-CAPITAL REGION ................................................... 75 5.3 ANNEX 3: NSSP FOR BELGIUM – FLANDERS ............................................................................. 80 5.4 ANNEX 4: NSSP FOR BELGIUM – WALLONIA ........................................................................... 101 5.5 ANNEX 5: NSSP FOR BULGARIA – VARNA REGION ................................................................... 122 5.6 ANNEX 6: NSSP FOR CROATIA ............................................................................................... 149 5.7 ANNEX 7: NSSP FOR CYPRUS ................................................................................................ 168 5.8 ANNEX 8: NSSP FOR CZECH REPUBLIC .................................................................................. 181 5.9 ANNEX 9: NSSP FOR GERMANY ............................................................................................. 204 5.10 ANNEX 10: NSSP FOR HUNGARY ........................................................................................... 226 5.11 ANNEX 11: NSSP FOR LITHUANIA ........................................................................................... 251 5.12 ANNEX 12: NSSP FOR POLAND .............................................................................................. 268 5.13 ANNEX 13: NSSP FOR PORTUGAL .......................................................................................... 290 5.14 ANNEX 14: NSSP FOR ROMANIA ............................................................................................ 311 5.15 ANNEX 15: NSSP FOR SLOVENIA ........................................................................................... 336 5.16 ANNEX 16: NSSP FOR SPAIN - BARCELONA REGION ................................................................ 357 5.17 ANNEX 17: NSSP FOR SWEDEN ............................................................................................. 374 5.18 ANNEX 18: SUMP QUALITY ASSURANCE APPROACH IN SLOVENIA ............................................ 400 5 / 44 D3.3 – Summary of new / enhanced programmes to encourage SUMP in PROSPERITY countries and regions August 2019 List of Figures Figure 1: The PROSPERITY concept to develop new or enhance existing NSSPs in partner countries ............................................................................................................................... 7 Figure 2: Categories of SUMP status - Comparison 2011 / 2017. ........................................ 13 Figure 3: Country of Focus National/Regional SUMP Programme development 2016-2019 29 Figure 4: Country of Focus National/Regional SUMP Programme status change 2016-2019 ............................................................................................................................................ 30 Figure 5: Partner National/Regional SUMP Programme status change 2016-2019 ............. 32 Figure 6: Partner National/Regional SUMP Programme status change 2016-2019 ............. 32 List of Tables Table 1: The 2017 categories of SUMP status: definition and number of countries (32 responses) .......................................................................................................................... 12 Table 2: Comparison between the 2011 and 2017 categories of SUMP status .................... 13 Table 3: Relation between the number of trained and experienced consultants and the demand from cities (answers from all 32 surveyed countries and regions) ........................................ 26 Table 4: The main documents/guidelines used to produce the NSSPs ................................ 34 Table 5: Overview of laws and regulations related to SUMP ............................................... 35 Table 6: Overview of financial resources for SUMP preparation and implementation .......... 37 Table 7: Overview of guidelines and methodology for SUMP development ......................... 37 Table 8: Elements of monitoring and evaluation (M&E) of SUMP ........................................ 39 Table 9: Existence of information channels ......................................................................... 40 6 / 44 D3.3 – Summary