Description of the Waynesburg Quadrangle

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Description of the Waynesburg Quadrangle DESCRIPTION OF THE WAYNESBURG QUADRANGLE By Ralph W. Stone. INTRODUCTION. In the northern part of the province the arrange­ The surface features of this plateau are variable, nounced anticlines, two of these disappearing near ment of the drainage was largely determined by but there is not so much diversity as in the higher the West Virginia line. Farther south the num­ LOCATION AND AKEA. conditions during the Glacial epoch. Before that plateau. In Kentucky and Tennessee it is pre­ ber is less, until on Kanawha River the regular The Waynesburg quadrangle is located in the time it is supposed that all of the streams north served in large areas as a nearly featureless plain, westward dip is interrupted by only one or two southwestern pa.rt of Pennsylvania, as will be seen of .central Kentucky flowed to the northwest, and but in other States it was less perfectly developed, folds of small proportions. by reference to the key map on the cover of the folio. discharged their waters through the St. Lawrence and has suffered greatly from dissection since it It extends from latitude 39° 45' on the south to 40° system. The encroachment of the great ice sheet was elevated. STRATIGRAPHY. on the north, and from longitude 80° on the east to closed this northern outlet, and new drainage lines West of the Highland Plateau there is a third The rocks which are exposed at the surface in 80° 15' on the west. It includes, therefore, one- were established along the present courses of the plain which is developed in the Central Basin of the Allegheny Plateaus belong entirely to the sixteenth of a square degree of the earth's surface, streams. Tennessee and in the western parts of Kentucky Carboniferous system. They include the Pocono, and has an area of 229.2 square miles. Surface relief. As the name Allegheny Plateaus and Indiana. Mauch Chunk, Pottsville, Allegheny, Conemaugh, The quadrangle is largely in Greene County, but implies, the surface of this division of the province and Monongahela formations and the Dunkard it extends into the southern part of Washington is composed of a number of plateaus. The highest GEOLOGY OF THE PLATEAUS. group. These will be described in the order of County, and includes a small portion of Fayette and most extensive plateau lies along the southeast­ Geologic structure. The structure of the Alle­ their age, beginning with the lowest. County on the east side of Monongahela River. ern margin of the division, and extends throughout gheny Plateaus is simple. The strata lie nearly Pocono formation. In this province the Pocono It extends to within 2 miles of the north line of its length. It is very old, and consequently is so flat, and their regularity is broken only by small formation forms the basal division of the Carbonif­ West Virginia and 15 miles of the east line of greatly dissected that its plateau character is not faults and low, broad folds. The most pronounced erous system. Its name is derived from the Pocono Ohio. It is named from the largest town within always apparent. Its surface rises from beneath fold is a low, broad arch known as the Cincinnati Mountains, in the eastern part of Pennsylvania, its borders, the county seat of Greene County. the Cretaceous cover in central Alabama at a height anticline. The main axis of this fold enters the where the formation consists largely of sandstone of 500 feet above sea level. From this altitude it Allegheny Plateaus from the direction of Chicago, and is over 1000 feet thick. It rests upon the red BELATION TO APPALACHIAN PROVINCE. ascends to 1700 feet at Chattanooga, 2400 feet at but a minor fold* from the western end of Lake rocks of the Catskill formation, the uppermost In its physiographic and geologic relations this Cumberland Gap, 3500 feet at New River, and Erie joins the major axis near Cincinnati. From member of the Devonian system. Although the quadrangle forms a part of the Appalachian prov­ probably reaches 4000 feet at its culminating point this point the axis of the anticline passes due south lower limit of the Pocono can not be determined ince, which extends from the Atlantic Coastal Plain in central West Virginia. From this point it to Lexington, Ky., and there curves to the south­ definitely from well records, it is believed that in on the east to the Mississippi lowlands on the west, descends to about 2800 feet on the southern line west parallel with the Appalachian Valley as far the Waynesburg quadrangle the formatioii is only and from central Alabama to Canada. of Pennsylvania and 2300 to 2400 feet in the cen­ as Nashville, Tenn. This anticline reaches its about 300 feet thick. Over a large area in Penn­ Appalachian province. With respect to topog­ tral part of the State. The plateau is widely devel­ maximum development in the vicinity of Lex­ sylvania the top is well marked by a calcareous raphy and the attitude of the rocks, the Appa­ oped in the northern counties of Pennsylvania and ington, where the Trenton limestone is exposed and sandy stratum, known as the Loyalhanna lachian province may be divided into two nearly throughout southern New York, and ranges in alti­ at an altitude of 1000 feet above sea level. In (Siliceous) limestone. (Charles Butts, Kittanning equal parts by an eastward-facing escarpment called tude from 2000 to 2400 feet. Tennessee it swells out into a dome-like struc- folio, No. 115, p. 5.) Where this stratum is the Allegheny Front. From Pennsylvania to'Ala­ This surface is best preserved in Alabama and i ture, which is exposed in' the topographic basin absent the top of the formation is not well defined. bama this separates the Allegheny Plateaus on the Tennessee, where it constitutes the Cumberland of central Tennessee. On the eastern margin of the coal field sandstone west from the Greater Appalachian Valley on the Plateau. North of Tennessee it doubtless was once The Cincinnati anticline divides the Allegheny predominates. , The Pocono contains, however, east. It is not a well-developed feature along the well developed, but now is difficult to identify. In Plateaus into two structural basins, which are best beds of ( gray sandy shale and occasional beds of whole line, but is especially prominent in parts of northern West Virginia and northern Pennsylvania known from the coal fields which they contain. red shale wnich, though usually thin, may be of Pennsylvania and Tennessee (see fig. 1). there are a few remnants of high, level land which The western basin extends far beyond the limits of considerable thickness. In southwestern Pennsyl­ appear to be parts of the original surface of this the province, and contains the Eastern Interior coal vania the formation is generally under cover, but plateau, but it is generally so dissected that only field of Illinois, Indiana, and Kentucky. The is penetrated in drilling deep wells for oil and the hilltops mark its former position. In Penn­ eastern basin lies entirely within the limits of the gas. In the southeastern part of the Appalachian sylvania the remnants of this plateau, which is ten­ Allegheny Plateaus, and includes the Appalachian field, in Virginia and West Virginia, the forma­ tatively correlated with the Cumberland Plateau, coal field. The Waynesburg quadrangle is situ­ tion contains workable beds of coal of limited are known as the Schooley peneplain. ated entirely within the Appalachian coal field, extent, and in parts of Pennsylvania it includes Throughout most of the province there are knobs and hence a somewhat detailed description of this thin worthless beds. and ridges which rise to a greater height than the field is necessary in order to present a clear idea Mauch Chunk formation. This formation over­ surface of the plateau, but generally they may be of the geologic features of the quadrangle. lies the Loyalhanna (Siliceous) limestone in' the distinguished by the fact that they stand above the Structure of Appalachian coal field. The geo­ Allegheny Front, along Conemaugh River east of general level of the surrounding hills. logic structure- of the Appalachian coal field is very Blairsville, and along Chestnut Ridge in Fayette The surface of the high Cumberland Plateau simple, consisting, in a general way, of a broad, County. It takes its name from Mauch Chunk, slopes to the west, but it is usually separated from flat, canoe-shaped trough. This is particularly in the anthracite coal region, where it is over / v>- the next lower or Highland Plateau by a generally true of the northern extremity. The deepest 2000 feet thick in the deep synclines and where FIG. 1. Diagram of northern portion of the Appalachian westward-facing escarpment. This escarpment is part of this trough lies along a line extending it is described as being composed largely of red province, showing physiographic divisions. most pronounced in Tennessee, where it has a southwest from Pittsburg across West Virginia to shale (Second Geol. Survey Pennsylvania, Final The general topographic features of the northern height of 1000 feet. Toward the north the height Huntington, on Ohio River. Toward this line Rept., vol. 3, pt. 1, p. 182). In the Allegheny part of the province are well illustrated by fig. 6 of the escarpment diminishes to 500 feet. In cen­ the rocks dip from both sides of the trough. Front it is made up of about 150 feet of heavy (illustration sheet). East of the Allegheny Front tral Kentucky and north of Ohio River it is so About the canoe-shaped northern end the rocks grayish to greenish sandstone at the bottom, and the topography consists of alternating ridges and indistinctly developed that it has not been recog­ outcrop in a rudely semicircular line and at all 100 feet of soft red shale.
Recommended publications
  • Geology and Coal Resources of Belmont County, Ohio
    Geology and Coal Resources of Belmont County, Ohio By HENRY L. BERRYHILL, JR. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 380 Prepared in cooperation with the Ohio Division of Geological Survey UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1963 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR STEW ART L. UDALL, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Thomas B. Nolan, Director For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington D.C. 20402 CONTENTS Page Stratigraphy Continued Abstract. __________________________________________ 1 Pennsylvanian rocks Continued Introduction _______________________________________ 1 Conemaugh formation Continued Purpose of the study- ___________________________ 1 Description of members Continued Preparation of the report ________________________ 2 Eastern Belmont County Continued Page Acknowledgments _______________________________ 2 Connellsville sandstone member __ 14 Previous workers _______________________________ 2 Lower Pittsburgh limestone mem­ Geography- ________________________________________ 3 ber __________________________ 14 Topography and drainage.-. _________________________ 3 Bellaire sandstone member. ___ 15 Structure, _ _____________________________________ 5 Upper Pittsburgh limestone mem­ Stratigraphy _ ______________________________________ 5 ber. _______________ __________ 15 General features. _______________________________ 5 Clay overlying the Upper Pitts­ Pennsylvanian rocks ___________________________ 6 Conemaugh formation. _ _____________________ 6 burgh limestone
    [Show full text]
  • Morphology, Phylogeny, and Evolution of Diadectidae (Cotylosauria: Diadectomorpha)
    Morphology, Phylogeny, and Evolution of Diadectidae (Cotylosauria: Diadectomorpha) by Richard Kissel A thesis submitted in conformity with the requirements for the degree of doctor of philosophy Graduate Department of Ecology & Evolutionary Biology University of Toronto © Copyright by Richard Kissel 2010 Morphology, Phylogeny, and Evolution of Diadectidae (Cotylosauria: Diadectomorpha) Richard Kissel Doctor of Philosophy Graduate Department of Ecology & Evolutionary Biology University of Toronto 2010 Abstract Based on dental, cranial, and postcranial anatomy, members of the Permo-Carboniferous clade Diadectidae are generally regarded as the earliest tetrapods capable of processing high-fiber plant material; presented here is a review of diadectid morphology, phylogeny, taxonomy, and paleozoogeography. Phylogenetic analyses support the monophyly of Diadectidae within Diadectomorpha, the sister-group to Amniota, with Limnoscelis as the sister-taxon to Tseajaia + Diadectidae. Analysis of diadectid interrelationships of all known taxa for which adequate specimens and information are known—the first of its kind conducted—positions Ambedus pusillus as the sister-taxon to all other forms, with Diadectes sanmiguelensis, Orobates pabsti, Desmatodon hesperis, Diadectes absitus, and (Diadectes sideropelicus + Diadectes tenuitectes + Diasparactus zenos) representing progressively more derived taxa in a series of nested clades. In light of these results, it is recommended herein that the species Diadectes sanmiguelensis be referred to the new genus
    [Show full text]
  • Presented by Title Before the Society, December £9, 1906)
    BULLETIN OF THE GEOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA Vol. 18, pp. 29-178 April 9,1907 CARBONIFEROUS OF THE APPALACHIAN BASIN * BY JOHN J. STEVENSON (Presented by title before the Society, December £9, 1906) CONTENTS Page Monongahela formation ............................................................................................... 30 Correlation ............................................................................................................... 30 East from the Alleghenies................................................................................... 45 Broad Top ........................................................................................................ 46 Maryland ......................................................................................................... 46 West from the Allegheny mountains, in Pennsylvania............................ 47 The First and Second bituminous basins............................................. 47 The Blairsville-Conncllsville basin............................................................ 60 The Greensburg basin.................................................................................. 64 The Lisbon-Irwin basin................................................................................ 54 The Waynesburg basin................................................................................ 58 The western basins in Pennsylvania....................................................... 60 The northern panhandle of W est Virginia....................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Section 4.2.2.2
    4.0 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS 4.1 GEOLOGY 4.1.1 Existing Resources 4.1.1.1 Geologic Setting The proposed LX Project is located entirely in the Kanawha Section of the Appalachian Plateaus physiographic province. The Appalachian Plateaus consist primarily of Pennsylvanian and Permian layered deposits, with Quaternary Alluvium overlying most geologic formations (USGS, 2015a). Elevations along the project range from 455 feet to 1,500 feet above mean sea level (USGS, 2015b). Topography in the project area ranges from relatively flat-lying rocks and rolling hills to steep slopes, with a local relief of up to several hundred feet (West Virginia Geological and Economic Survey [WVGES], 2004a; Greene County Government, 2013; ODNR, 2014a). The proposed RXE Project Grayson CS is located in the region known as the Eastern Kentucky Coal Field (Kentucky Geological Survey [KGS], 2012a), in an area of Quaternary alluvium composed of sand, silt, clay, and gravel created by floodplain deposits of present day streams. The thickness of the alluvium ranges from 0 to 60 feet (Whittington and Ferm, 1967). The proposed RXE Project Means CS is located within the Lexington Plains Section of the Interior Low Plateaus physiographic province (USGS, 2015a), in a region known as The Knobs, that consists of hundreds of isolated, steep-sloping, cone-shaped hills (KGS, 2012b). The nearest knob, Kashs Knob, is approximately one-quarter mile north of the proposed compressor station site (USGS, 1975). The USDA Soil Conservation Survey (SCS) County soil survey information indicates there are restrictive layers (potentially shallow bedrock) within the upper five feet of the ground surface at both CS locations (USDA SCS, 1974 and 1983).
    [Show full text]
  • The Geology of Switzerland Township, Monroe County, Ohio1
    THE OHIO JOURNAL OF SCIENCE VOL. LIU JANUARY, 1953 No. 1 THE GEOLOGY OF SWITZERLAND TOWNSHIP, MONROE COUNTY, OHIO1 THOMAS ARKLE, JR.2 Ohio Department of Natural Resources, Division of Geological Survey, Columbus 10 The aim of this report is twofold. It is primarily an attempt to summarize the geologic events that transpired in the past as interpreted from the exposed rocks in Switzerland Township, the Ohio River valley, and in the broader region of Ohio, West Virginia, and Pennsylvania. Secondly, this report summarizes the structural and economic geology of Switzerland Township and immediate environs. HISTORY AND ECONOMIC SETTING OF SWITZERLAND TOWNSHIP In April 1819, ten German and Swiss families embarked on a flat boat on the Aar River enroute to Berne, Switzerland, and thence on the Rhine to Antwerp, Belgium. After 48 days aboard the Eugenius, a French vessel bound for New York, they landed at Amboy, New Jersey. Six families purchased teams for the overland trek to Wheeling, West Virginia. At the mouth of Captina Creek at the present site of Powhatan Point, Ohio, they found two Pennsylvania Dutch men who informed them that there was plenty of government land in Monroe County, Ohio. On September 15, Father Tischer and part of his band continued down river 15 miles to Bare's Landing, Ohio Township, and the remainder settled in the hills above Powhatan Point. Switzerland Township, an area of about 28 square miles, was organized by the latter group January 1, 1827. These early settlers selected a small portion of the maturely dissected Allegheny Plateau (fig. 1) as the site for their new home.
    [Show full text]
  • Table of Contents Page 4.0 Characterization of Regional And
    Table of Contents Page 4.0 Characterization of Regional and Local Geology, Hydrogeology, and Hydrology 4-1 4.1 Physiography 4-1 4.2 Regional Geology 4-1 4.2.1 Pennsylvanian System 4-2 4.2.1.1 Conemaugh Group 4-2 4.2.1.2 Monongahela Group 4-2 4.2.2 Permian System – Dunkard Group 4-3 4.2.2.1 Waynesburg Formation 4-3 4.2.2.2 Washington Formation 4-4 4.2.2.3 Greene Formation 4-5 4.2.3 Quaternary System 4-6 4.2.4 Coal Resources 4-6 4.3 Structural Geology 4-7 4.3.1 Appalachian Plateaus Physiographic Province 4-7 4.3.2 Prototypical Area of the Pittsburgh Low Plateau Section 4-7 4.3.3 Joint Systems 4-8 4.3.4 Lineaments 4-8 4.3.5 Very Low Frequency Survey 4-9 4.4 Soils 4-10 4.4.1 Washington County Soil Survey 4-10 4.4.2 Colluvial Deposits 4-12 4.5 Hydrogeology 4-12 4.5.1 General 4-12 4.5.2 Aquifer Characteristics 4-13 4.5.3 Washington County Hydrogeology 4-14 4.6 Hydrology 4-14 4.6.1 Drainage Basin Characteristics 4-14 4.6.2 Upper Ohio – Wheeling Watershed 4-14 4.7 Climatology 4-15 4.0 Characterization of Regional and Local Geology, Hydrogeology, and Hydrology 4.1 Physiography The study area is situated within the Appalachian Plateaus Physiographic Province, a region that extends from Alabama into New York. The Appalachian Plateaus Physiographic Province in Pennsylvania is currently divided into seven sections based on characteristic geomorphic features unique to each.
    [Show full text]
  • Bulletin 19 of the Department of Geology, Mines and Water Resources
    COMMISSION OF MARYLAND GEOLOGICAL SURVEY S. JAMES CAMPBELL Towson RICHARD W. COOPER Salisbury JOHN C. GEYER Baltimore ROBERT C. HARVEY Frostburg M. GORDON WOLMAN Baltimore PREFACE In 1906 the Maryland Geological Survey published a report on "The Physical Features of Maryland", which was mainly an account of the geology and min- eral resources of the State. It included a brief outline of the geography, a more extended description of the physiography, and chapters on the soils, climate, hydrography, terrestrial magnetism and forestry. In 1918 the Survey published a report on "The Geography of Maryland", which covered the same fields as the earlier report, but gave only a brief outline of the geology and added chap- ters on the economic geography of the State. Both of these reports are now out of print. Because of the close relationship of geography and geology and the overlap in subject matter, the two reports were revised and combined into a single volume and published in 1957 as Bulletin 19 of the Department of Geology, Mines and Water Resources. The Bulletin has been subsequently reprinted in 1961 and 1966. Some revisions in statistical data were made in the 1961 and 1968 reprints. Certain sections of the Bulletin were extensively revised by Dr. Jona- than Edwards in this 1974 reprint. The Introduction, Mineral Resources, Soils and Agriculture, Seafood Industries, Commerce and Transportation and Manu- facturing chapters of the book have received the most revision and updating. The chapter on Geology and Physiography was not revised. This report has been used extensively in the schools of the State, and the combination of Geology and Geography in one volume allows greater latitude in adapting it to use as a reference or textbook at various school levels.
    [Show full text]
  • Synoptic Taxonomy of Major Fossil Groups
    APPENDIX Synoptic Taxonomy of Major Fossil Groups Important fossil taxa are listed down to the lowest practical taxonomic level; in most cases, this will be the ordinal or subordinallevel. Abbreviated stratigraphic units in parentheses (e.g., UCamb-Ree) indicate maximum range known for the group; units followed by question marks are isolated occurrences followed generally by an interval with no known representatives. Taxa with ranges to "Ree" are extant. Data are extracted principally from Harland et al. (1967), Moore et al. (1956 et seq.), Sepkoski (1982), Romer (1966), Colbert (1980), Moy-Thomas and Miles (1971), Taylor (1981), and Brasier (1980). KINGDOM MONERA Class Ciliata (cont.) Order Spirotrichia (Tintinnida) (UOrd-Rec) DIVISION CYANOPHYTA ?Class [mertae sedis Order Chitinozoa (Proterozoic?, LOrd-UDev) Class Cyanophyceae Class Actinopoda Order Chroococcales (Archean-Rec) Subclass Radiolaria Order Nostocales (Archean-Ree) Order Polycystina Order Spongiostromales (Archean-Ree) Suborder Spumellaria (MCamb-Rec) Order Stigonematales (LDev-Rec) Suborder Nasselaria (Dev-Ree) Three minor orders KINGDOM ANIMALIA KINGDOM PROTISTA PHYLUM PORIFERA PHYLUM PROTOZOA Class Hexactinellida Order Amphidiscophora (Miss-Ree) Class Rhizopodea Order Hexactinosida (MTrias-Rec) Order Foraminiferida* Order Lyssacinosida (LCamb-Rec) Suborder Allogromiina (UCamb-Ree) Order Lychniscosida (UTrias-Rec) Suborder Textulariina (LCamb-Ree) Class Demospongia Suborder Fusulinina (Ord-Perm) Order Monaxonida (MCamb-Ree) Suborder Miliolina (Sil-Ree) Order Lithistida
    [Show full text]
  • Department of Geology TABLE of CONTENTS
    GEOLOGY OF MORGAN COUNTY, OHIO DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State U n iv e r sity By DONALD LEONARD NORIXNG, B. A. The Ohio S ta te U n iv e r sity 1957 Approved by; A dviser 'Department of Geology TABLE OF CONTENTS Page INTRODUCTION LOCATION 1 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS .. 4 PURPOSE AND SCOPE 5 PREVIOUS WORK 7 PHYSIOGRAPHY GENERAL 9 DRAINAGE 14 RELIEF 14 STRATIGRAPHY PENNSYLVANIAN SYSTEM GEJSRAX 18 ALLEGHENY SERIES General 26 Kiddle Kittanning Clay Member 27 Kiddle Kittanning (No. 6) Coal Member 28 ¥ashingtonvilie Shale Member JO Upper K ittanning Coal Member J1 Lower Freeport Sandstone and Shale Member J2 Lower Freeport Limestone Member 55 Lower Freeport Clay Member 55 Lower Freeport (No. 6-A) Coal Member 55 Dorr Run Shale Member J6 Upper Freeport Sandstone and Shale Member J6 Bolivar Clay Member J8 Bolivar Coal Member 59 Upper Freeport Limestone Member 59 Upper Freeport Clay Member 40 Upper Freeport (No. 7) Coal Member 4l CCN3KAUGH SERIES General 45 Lower Mahoning Sandstone and Shale Member 48 Mahoning Limestone Member 51 Thornton Clay Member 52 Mahoning Coal Member 54 Upper Mahoning Sandstone and Shale Member 55 Mason Clay Member 57 ii iii Mason Coal Member 58 Brush Creek Shale and Sandstone Member 59 Brush Creek Coal Member 60 Brush Creek Limestone Member 6l Buffalo Sandstone and Shale Member 69 Wilgus Coal Member 72 Cambridge Limestone Member 75 Unnamed Shale Member 74 Bloomfield Limestone Member 75 Anderson Clay Member 75 Anderson Coal
    [Show full text]
  • Lower Perm/An Rocks
    COAL -BEARING UPPER PENNSYLVANIAN AND LOWER PERM/AN ROCKS WASHIN6TON AREA, PENNSYLVANIA Work done in cooperation with the Pennsylvania Bureau of Topographic and Geologic Survey GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 621 Coal-Bearing Upper Pennsylvanian and Lower Permian Rocks, Washington Area, Pennsylvania Part 1. Lithofacies Part 2. Economic and Engineering Geology By HENRY L. BERRYHILL, JR., STANLEY P. SCHWEINFURTH, and BION H. KENT GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 621 Work done in cooperation with the Pennsylvania Bureau of Topographic and Geologic Survey UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1971 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR WALTER J. HICKEL, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY William T. Pecora, Director Library of Congress catalog-card No. 73-608654 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, D.C. 20402 CONTENTS Page Page Abstract ................................................................................ 1 Stratigraphy Continued Introduction .......................................................................... 2 Pennsylvanian and Permian Systems Continued Purpose and scope of report .................................... 2 Dunkard Group ..... ........................ ................- 24 Previous work .............................................................. 3 Waynesburg Formation .............................. 24 Acknowledgments ........................................................ 3 Permian System ...................................... 25 Geography
    [Show full text]
  • U.S. Forest Service White Paper a Summary of the Groundwater
    U.S. Forest Service White Paper A Summary of the Groundwater Resources of the Wayne National Forest Troy Thompson Eastern Region Regional Hydrogeologist August 15, 2012 A Summary of the Groundwater Resources of the Wayne National Forest SCOPE The purpose of this paper is to provide baseline hydrogeological information for assessing the potential groundwater impacts of any proposed activities on the Wayne National Forest (WNF), such as the development of tight shale formations (most notably the Utica Shale). A review of the overall risks to groundwater posed by all oil and gas activities, including tight shale formation development, and possible approaches for identifying, monitoring, and mitigating those impacts is provided as an attachment to the this paper. This review is based on a review of readily available published information on the geology and hydrogeology of the WNF area. The most significant references used are cited in this document. All conclusions are subject to change based on the discovery of new information. LAND STATUS The land within the general boundary of the Wayne National Forest within the Ohio counties comprising parts of the Athens District - Athens Unit (Athens, Hocking, Morgan, Perry, and Vinton), the Athens District - Marietta Unit (Monroe and Washington), and the Ironton District (Gallia, Jackson, Lawrence, and Scioto). SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS Summary of Groundwater Conditions on the Forest The essential characteristics of the groundwater system across the WNF are summarized in the bullet points below. The following sections provide more detailed information on the hydrogeology and related geology of the Forest. The geology and hydrogeology of the WNF will be fairly consistent across all districts and units.
    [Show full text]
  • Distribution of Cogenetic Iron and Clay Deposits in the Central Appalachian Region
    DISTRIBUTION OF COGENETIC IRON AND CLAY DEPOSITS IN THE CENTRAL APPALACHIAN REGION by Mary Karandosovski McGuire B.S. Geology, The Pennsylvania State University, 1973 Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of Kenneth P. Dietrich School of Arts and Sciences in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science University of Pittsburgh 2012 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH DIETRICH SCHOOL OF ARTS AND SCIENCES This thesis was presented by Mary Karandosovski McGuire It was defended on March 30, 2012 and approved by Daniel Bain, Associate Professor, Faculty Charles Jones, Lecturer, Faculty Thesis Director: Thomas H. Anderson, Professor Emeritus, Faculty ii Copyright © by Mary K. McGuire 2012 iii DISTRIBUTION OF COGENETIC IRON AND CLAY DEPOSITS IN THE CENTRAL APPALACHIAN REGION Mary K. McGuire, M.S. University of Pittsburgh, 2012 Maps of more than 500 abandoned iron mines, 350 early iron furnaces, and numerous clay mines in the central part of the Appalachian region reveal the distribution and close association of siderite-limonite bearing ores and clay deposits. The deposits crop out from Lancaster County, Pennsylvania to Scioto County, Ohio, a distance of more than 300 miles. The geologic settings of the deposits are diverse. In the Valley and Ridge Province and Piedmont Province, mineralization follows structures such as major sub-horizontal thrust faults (e.g. Martic) and steep thrust faults, (e. g. Path Valley), that juxtapose carbonate units against other rocks. Carbonate units within the Plateau Province also contain economic deposits of iron ores and clay. The ores are commonly siderite and limonite principally in the form of nodules and other irregular masses in clayey, calcareous beds.
    [Show full text]