DOCSLIB.ORG

Geology and Coal Resources of Belmont County, Ohio

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Geology and Coal Resources of Belmont County, Ohio Geology and Coal Resources of Belmont County, Ohio By HENRY L. BERRYHILL, JR. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 380 Prepared in cooperation with the Ohio Division of Geological Survey UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1963 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR STEW ART L. UDALL, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Thomas B. Nolan, Director For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington D.C. 20402 CONTENTS Page Stratigraphy Continued Abstract. __________________________________________ 1 Pennsylvanian rocks Continued Introduction _______________________________________ 1 Conemaugh formation Continued Purpose of the study- ___________________________ 1 Description of members Continued Preparation of the report ________________________ 2 Eastern Belmont County Continued Page Acknowledgments _______________________________ 2 Connellsville sandstone member __ 14 Previous workers _______________________________ 2 Lower Pittsburgh limestone mem­ Geography- ________________________________________ 3 ber __________________________ 14 Topography and drainage.-. _________________________ 3 Bellaire sandstone member. ___ 15 Structure, _ _____________________________________ 5 Upper Pittsburgh limestone mem­ Stratigraphy _ ______________________________________ 5 ber. _______________ __________ 15 General features. _______________________________ 5 Clay overlying the Upper Pitts­ Pennsylvanian rocks ___________________________ 6 Conemaugh formation. _ _____________________ 6 burgh limestone member and History of name. _______________________ 6 underlying the Pittsburgh coal Distribution__ __ _ _______________________ - 7 16 Thickness^ _ ____________________________ 7 Monongahela formation _____________________ 16 General character. ______________________ 7 History of name_ _______________________ 16 Description of members _________________ Distribution. _-___--_---_.______________ 17 Western Belmont County. __ _________ Thickness_ _ _____-------__________._____ 17 General character.. _ ._---_______________ 17 Cambridge limestone member. ___ Description of members. ________________ 19 Anderson coal bed_ _____________ Pittsburgh (No. 8) coal bed __________ 19 Portersville limestone member of Redstone limestone member. _________ 22 Condit ______________________ Pittsburgh sandstone member. _______ 24 Undifferentiated strata overlying Redstone (No. 8A) coal bed__ _______ _ 25 the Portersville limestone mem­ Redstone sandstone member _ ________ 26 ber and underlying the Ames Fishpot limestone member ___________ 26 limestone member. ___________ Fishpot coal bed__ __________________ 28 Ames limestone member __ ______ Fishpot sandstone member. __________ 29 Fndifferentiated strata overlying Sewickley (No. 9) coal bed___ _______ 30 the Ames limestone member and Sewickley sandstone member_ ________ 32 underlying the Morgantown Benwood limestone member. ________ 33 sandstone member, ___________ 10 Morningview sandstone member_ _____ 37 Morgantown sandstone member __ 10 Arnoldsburg limestone member. ______ 38 Undifferentiated strata overlying Arnoldsburg sandstone member. ______ 38 the Morgantown sandstone Little Captina limestone member _ 39 member and underlying the McKeefrey siltstone member _ ________ 39 Connellsville sandstone mem­ Uniontown limestone member ________ 41 ber.. _____________________ 11 Uniontown (No. 10) coal bed_____--_- 41 ConneUsville sandstone member__ 11 Uniontown sandstone member____--_- 42 Lower Pittsburgh limestone mem­ Waynesburg limestone member. ______ 43 ber.---- _____________________ 11 Little Waynesburg coal bed. _________ 44 Bellaire sandstone member ____ 12 Gilboy sandstone member___ ________ 44 Upper Pittsburgh limestone mem­ Waynesburg (No. 11) coal bed____-__- 45 ber- ____ _______________ 12 Pennsylvanian and Permian rocks _______________ 46 Clay overlying the Upper Pitts­ Dunkard group, Washington and Greene forma­ burgh limestone member and tions undiff erentiated_ _____________________ 46 underlying the Pittsburgh coal History of names _______________-__----- 46 13 Distribution __________________-------_-- 48 Eastern Belmont County. ___________ 13 Thickness__ .__________--_____-_-------- 48 Undifferentiated strata overlying General character-- _ ____________-_-_---- 48 the Morgantown sandstone Description of members _________________ 48 member and underlying the Waynesburg sandstone member- _____ 49 Connellsville sandstone mem­ Elm Grove limestone member ________ 50 ber ______ ______________ 14 Wegee limestone member ________-_-- 51 IV CONTENTS Stratigraphy Continued Sedimentation Continued Pennsylvanian and Permian rocks Continued Depositional environment and paleogeography Con. Page Dunkard group Continued Monongahela formation _____________________ 80 Description of members Continued Pa8re Dunkard group.____________________________ 88 Mount Morris limestone member. ____ 52 Economic geology___________________________________ 90 Waynesburg "A" coal bed___________ 52 Coal__________________________________________ 90 Mannington sandstone member_______ 53 Methods of preparing estimates of reserves_____ 91 Little Washington coal bed__________ 54 Classification according to characteristics Washington sandstone member_______ 55 of the coal.__________________________ 91 Bristol limestone member.___________ 55 Rank____________________________ 91 Washington coal bed_______________ 55 Weight___ _________________________ 91 Undifferentiated strata overlying the Thickness _ _______________________ 91 Washington coal bed and under­ Overburden,_______________________ 92 lying the Lower Washington lime­ Classification according to abundance and stone member.___________________ 57 reliability of data__.________________ 92 Lower Washington limestone member _ 57 Distinction between original, remaining, Lower Marietta sandstone member__ 58 and recoverable reserves.______________ 92 Lower tongue of the Middle Wash­ Methods of recording data and making ington limestone member_ _________ 59 calculations __________________________ 93 Middle Marietta sandstone member. __ 60 Summary of coal reserves.___________________ 93 Upper tongue of the Middle Washing­ Pittsburgh coal bed_____________________ 93 ton limestone member.____________ 61 Fishpot coal bed______________________ 95 Washington "A" coal bed(?) _________ 62 Sewickley coal bed______________________ 95 Upper Marietta sandstone member____ 62 Uniontown coal bed___________________ 96 Upper Washington limestone member, 62 Waynesburg coal bed____________________ 96 Jollytown "A" coal bed__ ___________ 63 Waynesburg "A" coal bed_ ______________ 97 Aults Run sandstone member ________ 64 Washington coal bed____________________ 97 Unnamed limestone.________________ 65 Subsurface coal beds.___________________ 97 Unnamed sandstone_________________ 65 Previous estimates of the coal reserves in Bel- Dilles Bottom limestone member______ 65 mont County_____________________________ 99 Big Run coal bed___________________ 65 Quality of the coal_________ _________________ 99 Undifferentiated strata overlying the History of mining___________________________ 103 Big Run coal bed and underlying Coal production ____________________________ 104 the Powhatan Point limestone Limestone _____________________________________ 105 member. ________________________ 66 Sandstone.____________________________________ 105 Powhatan Point limestone member____ 66 Shale and mudstone__-__________--_-_-_--_--___- 105 Hendershot coal bed ________________ 67 Clay__________________________________________ 106 Undifferentiated strata overlying the Oil and gas_ ___________-________-----_-------__ 106 Hendershot coal bed______________ 67 Producing strata_________-_---_---__-------_ 106 Quaternary deposits_____________________________ 68 Berea sand____^________--------_-__--_- 106 Alluvium. _________________________________ 68 Big Injun sand:.________________________ 107 Stream-bed deposits__-________-____-____ 68 Keener sand_ _____________-_----_--_--_ 107 Flood-plain deposits_---_-__--___ _______ 69 Big Lime sand_____________-____----__ 108 Terrace deposits._______________________ 69 Other oil sands.________________________ 108 Perched alluvium. _ ______________________ 70 Location of oil and gas pools-________________ 108 Sedimentation-__ _ _________________________________ 70 Quality of the oil___________----_-____-_--_- 108 Description of sedimentary cycles ________________ 71 Future oil-producing potential-________-_--_-_ 108 Depositional environment and paleogeography______ 79 Selected bibliography----____--------------------___- 109 Conemaugh formation__ _ ___________________ 79 Index_____________________-_-_-____---_-_------__- HI ILLUSTRATIONS [Plates are in separate volume] PLATE 1. Geologic map of Belmont County, Ohio. 2. Generalized sections of the rocks that crop out in Belmont County. 3. Columnar sections of the Conemaugh formation in Belmont County. 4. Map of the Pittsburgh (No. 8) coal bed showing distribution and the structure and thickness of the lower bench. 5. Sections of the Pittsburgh (No. 8) coal bed. 6-8. Columnar sections showing the stratigraphic relation of the: 6. Pittsburgh and Redstone coal beds and the Redstone limestone and Pittsburgh sandstone members. 7. Redstone and Fishpot coal beds and the Redstone sandstone and Fishpot limestone members. 8. Fishpot and Sewickley coal beds and the Fishpot sandstone member. CONTENTS V PLATES 9-10. Map of the: 9. Fishpot coal bed showing the outcrop and thickness. 10. Sewickley (No. 9) coal
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Morphology, Phylogeny, and Evolution of Diadectidae (Cotylosauria: Diadectomorpha)
    Morphology, Phylogeny, and Evolution of Diadectidae (Cotylosauria: Diadectomorpha) by Richard Kissel A thesis submitted in conformity with the requirements for the degree of doctor of philosophy Graduate Department of Ecology & Evolutionary Biology University of Toronto © Copyright by Richard Kissel 2010 Morphology, Phylogeny, and Evolution of Diadectidae (Cotylosauria: Diadectomorpha) Richard Kissel Doctor of Philosophy Graduate Department of Ecology & Evolutionary Biology University of Toronto 2010 Abstract Based on dental, cranial, and postcranial anatomy, members of the Permo-Carboniferous clade Diadectidae are generally regarded as the earliest tetrapods capable of processing high-fiber plant material; presented here is a review of diadectid morphology, phylogeny, taxonomy, and paleozoogeography. Phylogenetic analyses support the monophyly of Diadectidae within Diadectomorpha, the sister-group to Amniota, with Limnoscelis as the sister-taxon to Tseajaia + Diadectidae. Analysis of diadectid interrelationships of all known taxa for which adequate specimens and information are known—the first of its kind conducted—positions Ambedus pusillus as the sister-taxon to all other forms, with Diadectes sanmiguelensis, Orobates pabsti, Desmatodon hesperis, Diadectes absitus, and (Diadectes sideropelicus + Diadectes tenuitectes + Diasparactus zenos) representing progressively more derived taxa in a series of nested clades. In light of these results, it is recommended herein that the species Diadectes sanmiguelensis be referred to the new genus
    [Show full text]
  • Presented by Title Before the Society, December £9, 1906)
    BULLETIN OF THE GEOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA Vol. 18, pp. 29-178 April 9,1907 CARBONIFEROUS OF THE APPALACHIAN BASIN * BY JOHN J. STEVENSON (Presented by title before the Society, December £9, 1906) CONTENTS Page Monongahela formation ............................................................................................... 30 Correlation ............................................................................................................... 30 East from the Alleghenies................................................................................... 45 Broad Top ........................................................................................................ 46 Maryland ......................................................................................................... 46 West from the Allegheny mountains, in Pennsylvania............................ 47 The First and Second bituminous basins............................................. 47 The Blairsville-Conncllsville basin............................................................ 60 The Greensburg basin.................................................................................. 64 The Lisbon-Irwin basin................................................................................ 54 The Waynesburg basin................................................................................ 58 The western basins in Pennsylvania....................................................... 60 The northern panhandle of W est Virginia....................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Section 4.2.2.2
    4.0 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS 4.1 GEOLOGY 4.1.1 Existing Resources 4.1.1.1 Geologic Setting The proposed LX Project is located entirely in the Kanawha Section of the Appalachian Plateaus physiographic province. The Appalachian Plateaus consist primarily of Pennsylvanian and Permian layered deposits, with Quaternary Alluvium overlying most geologic formations (USGS, 2015a). Elevations along the project range from 455 feet to 1,500 feet above mean sea level (USGS, 2015b). Topography in the project area ranges from relatively flat-lying rocks and rolling hills to steep slopes, with a local relief of up to several hundred feet (West Virginia Geological and Economic Survey [WVGES], 2004a; Greene County Government, 2013; ODNR, 2014a). The proposed RXE Project Grayson CS is located in the region known as the Eastern Kentucky Coal Field (Kentucky Geological Survey [KGS], 2012a), in an area of Quaternary alluvium composed of sand, silt, clay, and gravel created by floodplain deposits of present day streams. The thickness of the alluvium ranges from 0 to 60 feet (Whittington and Ferm, 1967). The proposed RXE Project Means CS is located within the Lexington Plains Section of the Interior Low Plateaus physiographic province (USGS, 2015a), in a region known as The Knobs, that consists of hundreds of isolated, steep-sloping, cone-shaped hills (KGS, 2012b). The nearest knob, Kashs Knob, is approximately one-quarter mile north of the proposed compressor station site (USGS, 1975). The USDA Soil Conservation Survey (SCS) County soil survey information indicates there are restrictive layers (potentially shallow bedrock) within the upper five feet of the ground surface at both CS locations (USDA SCS, 1974 and 1983).
    [Show full text]
  • The Geology of Switzerland Township, Monroe County, Ohio1
    THE OHIO JOURNAL OF SCIENCE VOL. LIU JANUARY, 1953 No. 1 THE GEOLOGY OF SWITZERLAND TOWNSHIP, MONROE COUNTY, OHIO1 THOMAS ARKLE, JR.2 Ohio Department of Natural Resources, Division of Geological Survey, Columbus 10 The aim of this report is twofold. It is primarily an attempt to summarize the geologic events that transpired in the past as interpreted from the exposed rocks in Switzerland Township, the Ohio River valley, and in the broader region of Ohio, West Virginia, and Pennsylvania. Secondly, this report summarizes the structural and economic geology of Switzerland Township and immediate environs. HISTORY AND ECONOMIC SETTING OF SWITZERLAND TOWNSHIP In April 1819, ten German and Swiss families embarked on a flat boat on the Aar River enroute to Berne, Switzerland, and thence on the Rhine to Antwerp, Belgium. After 48 days aboard the Eugenius, a French vessel bound for New York, they landed at Amboy, New Jersey. Six families purchased teams for the overland trek to Wheeling, West Virginia. At the mouth of Captina Creek at the present site of Powhatan Point, Ohio, they found two Pennsylvania Dutch men who informed them that there was plenty of government land in Monroe County, Ohio. On September 15, Father Tischer and part of his band continued down river 15 miles to Bare's Landing, Ohio Township, and the remainder settled in the hills above Powhatan Point. Switzerland Township, an area of about 28 square miles, was organized by the latter group January 1, 1827. These early settlers selected a small portion of the maturely dissected Allegheny Plateau (fig. 1) as the site for their new home.
    [Show full text]
  • Table of Contents Page 4.0 Characterization of Regional And
    Table of Contents Page 4.0 Characterization of Regional and Local Geology, Hydrogeology, and Hydrology 4-1 4.1 Physiography 4-1 4.2 Regional Geology 4-1 4.2.1 Pennsylvanian System 4-2 4.2.1.1 Conemaugh Group 4-2 4.2.1.2 Monongahela Group 4-2 4.2.2 Permian System – Dunkard Group 4-3 4.2.2.1 Waynesburg Formation 4-3 4.2.2.2 Washington Formation 4-4 4.2.2.3 Greene Formation 4-5 4.2.3 Quaternary System 4-6 4.2.4 Coal Resources 4-6 4.3 Structural Geology 4-7 4.3.1 Appalachian Plateaus Physiographic Province 4-7 4.3.2 Prototypical Area of the Pittsburgh Low Plateau Section 4-7 4.3.3 Joint Systems 4-8 4.3.4 Lineaments 4-8 4.3.5 Very Low Frequency Survey 4-9 4.4 Soils 4-10 4.4.1 Washington County Soil Survey 4-10 4.4.2 Colluvial Deposits 4-12 4.5 Hydrogeology 4-12 4.5.1 General 4-12 4.5.2 Aquifer Characteristics 4-13 4.5.3 Washington County Hydrogeology 4-14 4.6 Hydrology 4-14 4.6.1 Drainage Basin Characteristics 4-14 4.6.2 Upper Ohio – Wheeling Watershed 4-14 4.7 Climatology 4-15 4.0 Characterization of Regional and Local Geology, Hydrogeology, and Hydrology 4.1 Physiography The study area is situated within the Appalachian Plateaus Physiographic Province, a region that extends from Alabama into New York. The Appalachian Plateaus Physiographic Province in Pennsylvania is currently divided into seven sections based on characteristic geomorphic features unique to each.
    [Show full text]
  • Captina Creek Watershed Action Plan
    Captina Creek Watershed Action Plan 2014 A Collaboration of the Belmont Soil and Water Conservation District and Captina Creek Watershed Stakeholders Belmont Soil and Water Conservation District 101 N. Market St., Suite A St. Clairsville, Ohio 43950 Phone: 740-526-0027 Fax: 740-526-0032 Website: http://www.belmontSWCD.org Cover photos courtesy of Dover Woods Photography Powhatan Point, Ohio Table of Contents List of Figures……………………………………………………………………………..………iii List of Tables……………………………………………………………………………….…… vii List of Appendices……………………………………………………………………………...…ix List of Acronyms…………………………………………………………………………….…….x Acknowledgements…………………………………………………………………………….….xi Executive Summary…………………………………………………………………………...…xiii Section I: Watershed Overview Chapter 1: Introduction……………………………………………………………..……..2 Chapter 2: Defining the Watershed……………..……………………………………..…..4 Chapter 3: Watershed Demographics…………………………………………….……….9 Chapter 4: Watershed Geographic Locators……………………………………...……...15 Chapter 5: History of the Watershed and Restoration Efforts……………………...……17 Section II: Watershed Action Plan Development Chapter 1: Watershed Stakeholders and Partners…………………………………...…...23 Chapter 2: Partner Roles and Responsibilities………………………………………...…29 Chapter 3: Watershed Action Plan Development……………………………………..…32 Section III: Watershed Inventory Chapter 1: Geologic Description of the Watershed…………………………………...…37 Chapter 2: Biological Features of the Watershed……………………………………..…58 Chapter 3: Water Resources…………………………………………………………..….65 Chapter 4: Land Use in
    [Show full text]
  • Bulletin 19 of the Department of Geology, Mines and Water Resources
    COMMISSION OF MARYLAND GEOLOGICAL SURVEY S. JAMES CAMPBELL Towson RICHARD W. COOPER Salisbury JOHN C. GEYER Baltimore ROBERT C. HARVEY Frostburg M. GORDON WOLMAN Baltimore PREFACE In 1906 the Maryland Geological Survey published a report on "The Physical Features of Maryland", which was mainly an account of the geology and min- eral resources of the State. It included a brief outline of the geography, a more extended description of the physiography, and chapters on the soils, climate, hydrography, terrestrial magnetism and forestry. In 1918 the Survey published a report on "The Geography of Maryland", which covered the same fields as the earlier report, but gave only a brief outline of the geology and added chap- ters on the economic geography of the State. Both of these reports are now out of print. Because of the close relationship of geography and geology and the overlap in subject matter, the two reports were revised and combined into a single volume and published in 1957 as Bulletin 19 of the Department of Geology, Mines and Water Resources. The Bulletin has been subsequently reprinted in 1961 and 1966. Some revisions in statistical data were made in the 1961 and 1968 reprints. Certain sections of the Bulletin were extensively revised by Dr. Jona- than Edwards in this 1974 reprint. The Introduction, Mineral Resources, Soils and Agriculture, Seafood Industries, Commerce and Transportation and Manu- facturing chapters of the book have received the most revision and updating. The chapter on Geology and Physiography was not revised. This report has been used extensively in the schools of the State, and the combination of Geology and Geography in one volume allows greater latitude in adapting it to use as a reference or textbook at various school levels.
    [Show full text]
  • Synoptic Taxonomy of Major Fossil Groups
    APPENDIX Synoptic Taxonomy of Major Fossil Groups Important fossil taxa are listed down to the lowest practical taxonomic level; in most cases, this will be the ordinal or subordinallevel. Abbreviated stratigraphic units in parentheses (e.g., UCamb-Ree) indicate maximum range known for the group; units followed by question marks are isolated occurrences followed generally by an interval with no known representatives. Taxa with ranges to "Ree" are extant. Data are extracted principally from Harland et al. (1967), Moore et al. (1956 et seq.), Sepkoski (1982), Romer (1966), Colbert (1980), Moy-Thomas and Miles (1971), Taylor (1981), and Brasier (1980). KINGDOM MONERA Class Ciliata (cont.) Order Spirotrichia (Tintinnida) (UOrd-Rec) DIVISION CYANOPHYTA ?Class [mertae sedis Order Chitinozoa (Proterozoic?, LOrd-UDev) Class Cyanophyceae Class Actinopoda Order Chroococcales (Archean-Rec) Subclass Radiolaria Order Nostocales (Archean-Ree) Order Polycystina Order Spongiostromales (Archean-Ree) Suborder Spumellaria (MCamb-Rec) Order Stigonematales (LDev-Rec) Suborder Nasselaria (Dev-Ree) Three minor orders KINGDOM ANIMALIA KINGDOM PROTISTA PHYLUM PORIFERA PHYLUM PROTOZOA Class Hexactinellida Order Amphidiscophora (Miss-Ree) Class Rhizopodea Order Hexactinosida (MTrias-Rec) Order Foraminiferida* Order Lyssacinosida (LCamb-Rec) Suborder Allogromiina (UCamb-Ree) Order Lychniscosida (UTrias-Rec) Suborder Textulariina (LCamb-Ree) Class Demospongia Suborder Fusulinina (Ord-Perm) Order Monaxonida (MCamb-Ree) Suborder Miliolina (Sil-Ree) Order Lithistida
    [Show full text]
  • Department of Geology TABLE of CONTENTS
    GEOLOGY OF MORGAN COUNTY, OHIO DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State U n iv e r sity By DONALD LEONARD NORIXNG, B. A. The Ohio S ta te U n iv e r sity 1957 Approved by; A dviser 'Department of Geology TABLE OF CONTENTS Page INTRODUCTION LOCATION 1 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS .. 4 PURPOSE AND SCOPE 5 PREVIOUS WORK 7 PHYSIOGRAPHY GENERAL 9 DRAINAGE 14 RELIEF 14 STRATIGRAPHY PENNSYLVANIAN SYSTEM GEJSRAX 18 ALLEGHENY SERIES General 26 Kiddle Kittanning Clay Member 27 Kiddle Kittanning (No. 6) Coal Member 28 ¥ashingtonvilie Shale Member JO Upper K ittanning Coal Member J1 Lower Freeport Sandstone and Shale Member J2 Lower Freeport Limestone Member 55 Lower Freeport Clay Member 55 Lower Freeport (No. 6-A) Coal Member 55 Dorr Run Shale Member J6 Upper Freeport Sandstone and Shale Member J6 Bolivar Clay Member J8 Bolivar Coal Member 59 Upper Freeport Limestone Member 59 Upper Freeport Clay Member 40 Upper Freeport (No. 7) Coal Member 4l CCN3KAUGH SERIES General 45 Lower Mahoning Sandstone and Shale Member 48 Mahoning Limestone Member 51 Thornton Clay Member 52 Mahoning Coal Member 54 Upper Mahoning Sandstone and Shale Member 55 Mason Clay Member 57 ii iii Mason Coal Member 58 Brush Creek Shale and Sandstone Member 59 Brush Creek Coal Member 60 Brush Creek Limestone Member 6l Buffalo Sandstone and Shale Member 69 Wilgus Coal Member 72 Cambridge Limestone Member 75 Unnamed Shale Member 74 Bloomfield Limestone Member 75 Anderson Clay Member 75 Anderson Coal
    [Show full text]
  • Captina Creek Watershed Action Plan
    Captina Creek Watershed Action Plan 2014 A Collaboration of the Belmont Soil and Water Conservation District and Captina Creek Watershed Stakeholders Belmont Soil and Water Conservation District 101 N. Market St., Suite A St. Clairsville, Ohio 43950 Phone: 740-526-0027 Fax: 740-526-0032 Website: http://www.belmontSWCD.org Cover photos courtesy of Dover Woods Photography Powhatan Point, Ohio Table of Contents List of Figures……………………………………………………………………………..………iii List of Tables……………………………………………………………………………….…… vii List of Appendices……………………………………………………………………………...…ix List of Acronyms…………………………………………………………………………….…….x Acknowledgements…………………………………………………………………………….….xi Executive Summary…………………………………………………………………………...…xiii Section I: Watershed Overview Chapter 1: Introduction……………………………………………………………..……..2 Chapter 2: Defining the Watershed……………..……………………………………..…..4 Chapter 3: Watershed Demographics…………………………………………….……….9 Chapter 4: Watershed Geographic Locators……………………………………...……...15 Chapter 5: History of the Watershed and Restoration Efforts……………………...……17 Section II: Watershed Action Plan Development Chapter 1: Watershed Stakeholders and Partners…………………………………...…...23 Chapter 2: Partner Roles and Responsibilities………………………………………...…29 Chapter 3: Watershed Action Plan Development……………………………………..…32 Section III: Watershed Inventory Chapter 1: Geologic Description of the Watershed…………………………………...…37 Chapter 2: Biological Features of the Watershed……………………………………..…58 Chapter 3: Water Resources…………………………………………………………..….65 Chapter 4: Land Use in
    [Show full text]
  • Lower Perm/An Rocks
    COAL -BEARING UPPER PENNSYLVANIAN AND LOWER PERM/AN ROCKS WASHIN6TON AREA, PENNSYLVANIA Work done in cooperation with the Pennsylvania Bureau of Topographic and Geologic Survey GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 621 Coal-Bearing Upper Pennsylvanian and Lower Permian Rocks, Washington Area, Pennsylvania Part 1. Lithofacies Part 2. Economic and Engineering Geology By HENRY L. BERRYHILL, JR., STANLEY P. SCHWEINFURTH, and BION H. KENT GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 621 Work done in cooperation with the Pennsylvania Bureau of Topographic and Geologic Survey UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1971 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR WALTER J. HICKEL, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY William T. Pecora, Director Library of Congress catalog-card No. 73-608654 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, D.C. 20402 CONTENTS Page Page Abstract ................................................................................ 1 Stratigraphy Continued Introduction .......................................................................... 2 Pennsylvanian and Permian Systems Continued Purpose and scope of report .................................... 2 Dunkard Group ..... ........................ ................- 24 Previous work .............................................................. 3 Waynesburg Formation .............................. 24 Acknowledgments ........................................................ 3 Permian System ...................................... 25 Geography
    [Show full text]
  • U.S. Forest Service White Paper a Summary of the Groundwater
    U.S. Forest Service White Paper A Summary of the Groundwater Resources of the Wayne National Forest Troy Thompson Eastern Region Regional Hydrogeologist August 15, 2012 A Summary of the Groundwater Resources of the Wayne National Forest SCOPE The purpose of this paper is to provide baseline hydrogeological information for assessing the potential groundwater impacts of any proposed activities on the Wayne National Forest (WNF), such as the development of tight shale formations (most notably the Utica Shale). A review of the overall risks to groundwater posed by all oil and gas activities, including tight shale formation development, and possible approaches for identifying, monitoring, and mitigating those impacts is provided as an attachment to the this paper. This review is based on a review of readily available published information on the geology and hydrogeology of the WNF area. The most significant references used are cited in this document. All conclusions are subject to change based on the discovery of new information. LAND STATUS The land within the general boundary of the Wayne National Forest within the Ohio counties comprising parts of the Athens District - Athens Unit (Athens, Hocking, Morgan, Perry, and Vinton), the Athens District - Marietta Unit (Monroe and Washington), and the Ironton District (Gallia, Jackson, Lawrence, and Scioto). SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS Summary of Groundwater Conditions on the Forest The essential characteristics of the groundwater system across the WNF are summarized in the bullet points below. The following sections provide more detailed information on the hydrogeology and related geology of the Forest. The geology and hydrogeology of the WNF will be fairly consistent across all districts and units.
    [Show full text]