A Nobel Prize–Winning Culture - Science Careers - Biotech,

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

A Nobel Prize–Winning Culture - Science Careers - Biotech, A Nobel Prize–Winning Culture - Science Careers - Biotech, ... http://sciencecareers.sciencemag.org/career_magazine/previo... http://sciencecareers.sciencemag.org Career Advice A Nobel Prize–Winning Culture Nobel laureate Venki Ramakrishnan sits at a dining table in the airy, top-floor canteen of the The MRC Laboratory of "There's a tradition of trying to Molecular Biology (CREDIT: MRC Medical Research hire smart people and then Laboratory of Molecular Biology) Council (http://www.mrc.ac.uk basically leaving them to it." -- /index.htm) (MRC) Laboratory of Molecular Biology MRC Laboratory of Molecular (http://www2.mrc-lmb.cam.ac.uk/) (LMB) in Cambridge, U.K. A buzz of lively conversation rises from the table. It's Biology group leader Leo James. morning tea break, and the room is full of researchers. To a British observer, there's nothing unusual about this scene. "Every university department has tea breaks. All of England has tea breaks," Ramakrishnan says. This typical, casual canteen chat only partly reveals the facility's successful lab culture, which encouraged Ramakrishnan to focus on understanding the ribosome, the cellular machinery that turns RNA into protein. The work won Ramakrishnan a share of the Nobel Prize in chemistry 2009 (http://nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/chemistry /laureates/2009/) . He's hardly alone. MRC LMB is among the world's most successful research centers as judged by its number of Nobel laureates. LMB lists (http://www2.mrc-lmb.cam.ac.uk/achievements/nobel-prizes) (see box) 13 in-house scientists sharing nine Nobel Prizes since the laboratory was founded by MRC in 1947, among them Francis Crick and James Watson, who received the prize in 1962 for unraveling the structure of DNA. This isn't a world record for Nobel wins. But where other centers may hire established scientists who have already done Nobel-quality work, "generally, the Nobel Prizes we've won have been for work done here," LMB Director Hugh Pelham says. Bright young things One way to run a successful research center is buying in what Pelham terms "empire builders" -- established scientists already running large research groups elsewhere. But most of LMB's recruits are promising young researchers. "Ideally, we'd like to hire people in their early 30s or occasionally even younger," Pelham says. Some new heads of research teams have come straight from earning a Ph.D. One young recruit was Jason Chin, who was invited to start a research group after giving a talk at LMB when he was just a few months into a postdoc at The Scripps Research Institute (http://www.scripps.edu/e_index.html) in San Diego, California. Chin finished his postdoc, joined LMB in 2003, then last year won the European Molecular Biology Organization (http://www.embo.org/index.php) gold medal for his work in synthetic biology. (Read more about him in this previous Science Careers article (http://sciencecareers.sciencemag.org/career_magazine/previous_issues /articles/2010_09_17/caredit.a1000091) .) 1 of 4 26/01/2012 10:54 A Nobel Prize–Winning Culture - Science Careers - Biotech, ... http://sciencecareers.sciencemag.org/career_magazine/previo... Chin is just one example of the lab's successful, and early, talent spotting. The lab often identifies promising young scientists through personal recommendations or first-hand observation, at conferences, for example. "We listen to them at talks, have them visit to talk about their goals and ideas, and get a feel for whether they're good," Ramakrishnan says. "Talking to them is very important. Smart people stand out," Pelham says, then adds that they don't get it right every time. To be of interest to LMB, young scientists should have done important or original work in more than one scientific setting. But important research doesn't necessarily mean a paper in Cell. "We don't really care if they've had a high-profile paper," Ramakrishnan says. "We go less by publications and are more willing to use our own criteria, of which an important component is that they should be interested in a long-term, challenging goal." Jason Chin (CREDIT: MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology) The laboratory uses a U.S.-style tenure system -- MRC's Programme Leader-Track (PLT) scheme (http://www.mrc.ac.uk/About /WorkingfortheMRC/Researchwork/index.htm) -- to train new early-career group leaders and weed out unproductive people. About a fifth of the leaders of 'LMB's more than 50 research groups are currently PLTs, with 80% of the rest having already passed through the program. All PLTs have a midterm review, where they give a presentation and are quizzed by Pelham and the heads of LMB's four divisions: cell biology, neurobiology, protein and nucleic acid chemistry, and structural studies. Like all LMB staff members, they have an annual appraisal. "By these means, we let PLTs know what we expect and what we value," Pelham says. Unlike many tenure calendars, the PLT schedule is flexible; at any point during the first 6 years, the laboratory can award a permanent position. Most succeed, but some have to leave, Pelham adds. Tea-break triumphs Also important is inspiring and guiding younger researchers to do great work. One way this is done is through LMB's collaborative, informal culture. The tea breaks are a good example. "There are senior investigators sitting with first-year graduate students," Ramakrishnan says. Asking anyone for help is encouraged. Pelham says that, as a recently tenured group leader, he learned yeast genetics through discussions with people in another research group. For students, it's "totally acceptable" to ask a senior researcher who isn't your own supervisor about your problem, says Rebecca Voorhees, who has just finished a Ph.D. and is now a postdoc in Ramakrishnan's research group. "That's the collaborative attitude at the LMB." Hugh Pelham (CREDIT: MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology) Outside those tea breaks, young scientists have easy access to all group leaders, especially their own. None of the leaders have a personal assistant who screens visitors, says Ramakrishnan, whose office leads directly onto his laboratory. "I try to be aware day to day of what's going on in the lab." Voorhees says she sees Ramakrishnan several times a day. "You're more comfortable dropping in and asking a quick question," she says. "At every other lab I've visited, to get to a senior researcher's office, you've got to go through a door, a secretary, and another door." Big ideas CREDIT: MRC Laboratory of Molecular Another reason for LMB's success may be the risky, hard-to-solve problems Biology the researchers are encouraged to tackle. "At the LMB, you can approach big questions, like how is gene expression controlled?" says Lori Passmore, an Venki Ramakrishnan with LMB LMB group leader studying the function and assembly of protein complexes. MRC postdocs Israel Sanchez Passmore was a postdoc in Ramakrishnan's lab. (left) and Hong Jin (right). 2 of 4 26/01/2012 10:54 A Nobel Prize–Winning Culture - Science Careers - Biotech, ... http://sciencecareers.sciencemag.org/career_magazine/previo... LMB researchers can afford to ask big questions: They don't have to teach, and they are free to do whatever research interests them. "There's a tradition of trying to hire smart people and then basically leaving them to it," says Leo James, a group leader in the Protein and Nucleic Acid Chemistry Division. There's less pressure to constantly publish papers. "It's an environment where you're encouraged to go after the big thing instead of having to have a publication every 3 months," James says. Behind the success LMB's funding model also encourages risky, long-term research and the lab's collaborative culture. It receives stable core funding, which is shared by all research groups and reviewed every 5 years. The divisions each get a share of space and the budget, which they distribute at their discretion, Pelham says. Group leaders can expect a couple of MRC-funded positions for postdoctoral researchers or technicians and an average of two Ph.D. students. Additional postdoctoral researchers may be funded from personal fellowships. Many group leaders also have external grants that allow them to hire more people, but they must get permission before applying to ensure there's enough space for expansion. Research projects are funded from the core MRC budget, subject to decisions by Pelham and the heads of the laboratory's four Lori Passmore (CREDIT: MRC divisions. The process is faster than making a grant application, James says. Laboratory of Molecular Biology) Ramakrishnan says LMB's secure, long-term funding allowed him to focus on his Nobel Prize–winning research, which he began at the University of Utah (http://www.utah.edu/portal /site/uuhome/) in Salt Lake City. "I didn't put all my energy into that project until I had the security of the LMB," he says. Otherwise, he'd have spread his efforts over several projects to reduce the risk, and "probably missed the bus." The success of every researcher contributes to the lab's funding prospects, which encourages cooperation, Ramakrishnan says. "One thing I've noticed here is, if someone does well, there's no jealousy. We're all in the same boat." Replicating success LMB has a long history, and replicating its culture is a challenge. The Howard Hughes Medical Institute (http://www.hhmi.org/) 's Janelia Farm Research Campus (http://www.hhmi.org/janelia/) in Ashburn, Virginia, was founded in 2006 with a similar approach. (See related Science Careers articles here (http://sciencecareers.sciencemag.org/career_magazine/previous_issues /articles/2005_09_09/noDOI.7175408375421891012) and here Leo James (CREDIT: MRC Laboratory of (http://sciencecareers.sciencemag.org/career_magazine/previous_issues Molecular Biology) /articles/2006_11_03/noDOI.5083521060779468889) .) Janelia Farm even experimented with MRC LMB's traditional English tea and coffee hours, but an all-day cappuccino bar and affordable lunchroom worked better in America, says Kevin Moses, former chief academic officer at Janelia Farm.
Recommended publications
  • FASC Newsletter December 2018
    FASC Newsletter December 2018 There are a range of initiative by Societies underway aimed at increasing younger chemists’ involvement in the concerns of chemists. Representatives are to be found in Africa who serve on these bodies. Also included in the newsletter is information on the next two young chemists who have been associated with elements in the Periodic Table and come from Africa. Read more below. The December end of year holidays are upon us. On behalf of the FASC Executive I wish you all a good time with friends (celebrating) and that 2019 will be a successful year for all. The next newsletter will be sent out at the end of January. Neil Coville Content Information for the newsletter Advertising in the FASC newsletter FASC member countries FASC 2019 African Nobel Prize winner, Aaron Klug, dies Member Country Society News South Africa i) SACI Convention ii) Interview with Prof Bert Klumperman AAS IUPAC news i) International Younger Chemists Network (IYCN) ii) Periodic Table of Younger Chemists Awards (Edmund Sanganyado, Emmanuel Chukwudalu Ohaekenyem) iii) Opening of the International Year of the Periodic Table African Journal of Chemical Education (AJCE) African Journals of Chemistry Africa Conference on Research in Chemical Education (ACRICE-4 2019) PACN news ACS news RSC news Conferences (Detailed information and adverts follow the listing) AMRS2019 The 10th International Conference of the African Materials Research Society (AMRS2019) Arusha, Tanzania IUPAC FOR AFRICA, Postgraduate Summer School on Green Chemistry, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. The Second African Light Source Conference (AfLS2) Accra, Ghana, It is concurrent with the Pan African Conference on Crystallography (PCCR2).
    [Show full text]
  • Notes and News
    Notes and News Sir Aaron Klug, NL, The Discoverer of his Ph.D. degree in Physics in 1953 from the Trinity Crystallographic Electron Microscopy, College, Cambridge. Passes Away In late 1953, he moved to the Birkbeck College, University of London where he started collaborating with ubbed ‘one of the mildest, most broad-minded and the X-ray crystallographer Rosalind Franklin on her studies Dmost cultured of scientists’, Aaron Klug, who was on tobacco mosaic virus. The combined commendable awarded the Nobel Prize in Chemistry in 1982 for “his technical skill of Franklin in producing X-ray diffraction development of crystallographic electron microscopy and images and deep theoretical understanding of matter by his structural elucidation of biologically important nucleic Klug led to the determination of the general outline of the acid-protein complexes,” died on November 20, 2018 at structure of this virus just before the untimely demise of the age of 92 years. Franklin from cancer in 1958. Klug always acknowledged Klug was born on 11th August, 1926 in •elva, the help that he received from Rosalind in this domain of Lithuania to Jewish parents Lazar Klug, a cattleman, and research. Bella (née Silin) Klug. His family moved to South Africa In 1962, Klug joined the newly founded MRC when he was two years old. He had his early education in Laboratory of Molecular Biology (LMB) in Cambridge Durban High School. He received his B.Sc. degree with a where he used X-ray diffraction methods, microscopy and first class Honours from the University of the structural modelling to develop ‘crystallographic electron Witwaterstrand and his M.Sc.
    [Show full text]
  • Photosynthesis and the Web: 2001
    Photosynthesis Research 68: 1–28, 2001. 1 © 2001 Kluwer Academic Publishers. Printed in the Netherlands. Minireview Photosynthesis and the Web: 2001 Larry Orr1 & Govindjee2,∗ 1Center for the Study of Early Events in Photosynthesis, Arizona State University, Box 871604, Tempe, AZ 85287- 1604, USA; 2Departments of Biochemistry and Plant Biology and Center of Biophysics & Computational Biology, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL 61801-3707, USA; ∗Author for correspondence (e-mail: [email protected]; fax: +1-217-244-7246) Received 15 June 2001; accepted in revised form 25 June 2001 Key words: Internet, K-12 education, Mosaic, NCSA (National Center for Supercomputing Applications), World Wide Web Abstract First, a brief history of the Internet and the World Wide Web is presented. This is followed by relevant information on photosynthesis-related web sites grouped into several categories: (1) large group sites, (2) comprehensive overview sites, (3) specific subject sites, (4) individual researcher sites, (5) kindergarten through high school (K-12) educational sites, (6) books and journals, and, 7) other useful sites. A section on searching the Web is also included. Finally, we have included an appendix with all of the web sites discussed herein as well as other web sites that space did not allow. Readers are requested to send comments, corrections and additions to [email protected]. Abbreviations: ARPA – Advanced Research Projects Agency; ASU – Arizona State University; HTML – Hy- per Text Markup Language; NCSA – National Center for Supercomputing Applications; TCP/IP – Transmission Control Protocol/Internet Protocol; UIUC – University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign; URL – Universal Resource Locator; WWW – World Wide Web Introduction Three years ago we published a short paper detailing the then current state of photosynthesis web sites and how to find them (Orr and Govindjee 1998).
    [Show full text]
  • A Biochemistry Special
    PROTEIN CHEMISTRY STRUCTURAL BIOLOGY YEARS OF ‘DESIGNING’ BRAND AT THE UK’S LARGEST BIOCHEMICAL NEW PROTEINS PARTICLE ACCELERATOR 50 BREAKTHROUGHS : A BIOCHEMISTRY SPECIAL THE MAGAZINE OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY OF BIOLOGY ⁄www.rsb.org.uk Vol 62 No 5 supplement • Oct/Nov 2015 FLUORO SCIENCE Nobel Prize winner Roger Tsien on the discovery and development of the green fluorescent protein Foreword About David Baulcombe Contents this issue Volume 62 No 5 Oct/Nov 2015 Produced in partnership with the Biochemical Society, this mini special issue aims to showcase the fascinating and important work that biochemists do. Biochemistry has created the tools, techniques and knowledge on which modern bioscience depends. It is at the very core of how all life on Earth works Welcome and its output underpins many other areas of the life sciences ROYAL SOCIETY OF BIOLOGY Charles Darwin House, including medicine, pharmaceuticals, agriscience and 12 Roger Street, London WC1N 2JU biotechnology. Our content here is focused towards the iochemistry is sometimes compared to cookery. Tel: 020 7685 2550 exciting chemistry of proteins, just one of many different types Chefs and biochemists both mix ingredients and Fax: 020 3514 3204 of macromolecule studied by biochemists. We can never do wait with excited expectation for the result – either a [email protected] justice to such a remarkable field in just 16 pages, but we delicious new dish or an experimental outcome. They www.rsb.org.uk hope this one-off biochemistry special whets your both follow recipes, although biochemists refer appetite to find out more. to theirs as ‘experimental protocols’.
    [Show full text]
  • Joachim Frank
    232 THE NOBEL PRIZES Single-Particle Reconstruction of Biological Molecules – Story in a Sample Nobel Lecture, December 8, 2017 by Joachim Frank1,2 1Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biophysics, Columbia 2Uni- versity Medical Center; 2Department of Biological Sciences, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA. THE BACKGROUND I developed an interest in electron optics when I worked with Ernst Kinder on my masters thesis project in Physics at the University of Munich. The subject of my thesis was backscattering of electrons on the surface of liquid gold, an ambitious undertaking that forced me to con- struct a vacuum chamber, a crucible to heat up the gold, a detector, and an electron gun. In 1943, working with the electron microscope, Kinder had studied butterfy wings, which as he realized gained their brilliant colors from interference of light on gratings formed by tiny scales, arranged in regular order. I signed on to a graduate project with Walter Hoppe at the Max-Planck Institute in Munich (Fig. 1), an X-ray crystallographer whose interest had turned to electron microscopy (EM) as a means to study biomolecules. He viewed the electron microscope as a difractometer that, unlike the one employed in X-ray crystallography, could record not just amplitudes of difracted electrons, but their phases as well. This was a fancy way of say- ing electron microscopes were able to form images. Joachim Frank Lecture 233 Figure 1. Walter Hoppe (1917– 1986) with the Siemens El- miskope 102. It is necessary at this point to look back at the state of the art of molec- ular EM in the late 60s and early 70s.
    [Show full text]
  • List of Nobel Laureates 1
    List of Nobel laureates 1 List of Nobel laureates The Nobel Prizes (Swedish: Nobelpriset, Norwegian: Nobelprisen) are awarded annually by the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences, the Swedish Academy, the Karolinska Institute, and the Norwegian Nobel Committee to individuals and organizations who make outstanding contributions in the fields of chemistry, physics, literature, peace, and physiology or medicine.[1] They were established by the 1895 will of Alfred Nobel, which dictates that the awards should be administered by the Nobel Foundation. Another prize, the Nobel Memorial Prize in Economic Sciences, was established in 1968 by the Sveriges Riksbank, the central bank of Sweden, for contributors to the field of economics.[2] Each prize is awarded by a separate committee; the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences awards the Prizes in Physics, Chemistry, and Economics, the Karolinska Institute awards the Prize in Physiology or Medicine, and the Norwegian Nobel Committee awards the Prize in Peace.[3] Each recipient receives a medal, a diploma and a monetary award that has varied throughout the years.[2] In 1901, the recipients of the first Nobel Prizes were given 150,782 SEK, which is equal to 7,731,004 SEK in December 2007. In 2008, the winners were awarded a prize amount of 10,000,000 SEK.[4] The awards are presented in Stockholm in an annual ceremony on December 10, the anniversary of Nobel's death.[5] As of 2011, 826 individuals and 20 organizations have been awarded a Nobel Prize, including 69 winners of the Nobel Memorial Prize in Economic Sciences.[6] Four Nobel laureates were not permitted by their governments to accept the Nobel Prize.
    [Show full text]
  • Image-Brochure-LNLM-2020-LQ.Pdf
    NOBEL LAUREATES PARTICIPATING IN LINDAU EVENTS SINCE 1951 Peter Agre | George A. Akerlof | Kurt Alder | Zhores I. Alferov | Hannes Alfvén | Sidney Altman | Hiroshi Amano | Philip W. Anderson | Christian B. Anfinsen | Edward V. Appleton | Werner Arber | Frances H. Arnold | Robert J. Aumann | Julius Axelrod | Abhijit Banerjee | John Bardeen | Barry C. Barish | Françoise Barré-Sinoussi | Derek H. R. Barton | Nicolay G. Basov | George W. Beadle | J. Georg Bednorz | Georg von Békésy |Eric Betzig | Bruce A. Beutler | Gerd Binnig | J. Michael Bishop | James W. Black | Elizabeth H. Blackburn | Patrick M. S. Blackett | Günter Blobel | Konrad Bloch | Felix Bloch | Nicolaas Bloembergen | Baruch S. Blumberg | Niels Bohr | Max Born | Paul Boyer | William Lawrence Bragg | Willy Brandt | Walter H. Brattain | Bertram N. Brockhouse | Herbert C. Brown | James M. Buchanan Jr. | Frank Burnet | Adolf F. Butenandt | Melvin Calvin Thomas R. Cech | Martin Chalfie | Subrahmanyan Chandrasekhar | Pavel A. Cherenkov | Steven Chu | Aaron Ciechanover | Albert Claude | John Cockcroft | Claude Cohen- Tannoudji | Leon N. Cooper | Carl Cori | Allan M. Cormack | John Cornforth André F. Cournand | Francis Crick | James Cronin | Paul J. Crutzen | Robert F. Curl Jr. | Henrik Dam | Jean Dausset | Angus S. Deaton | Gérard Debreu | Petrus Debye | Hans G. Dehmelt | Johann Deisenhofer Peter A. Diamond | Paul A. M. Dirac | Peter C. Doherty | Gerhard Domagk | Esther Duflo | Renato Dulbecco | Christian de Duve John Eccles | Gerald M. Edelman | Manfred Eigen | Gertrude B. Elion | Robert F. Engle III | François Englert | Richard R. Ernst Gerhard Ertl | Leo Esaki | Ulf von Euler | Hans von Euler- Chelpin | Martin J. Evans | John B. Fenn | Bernard L. Feringa Albert Fert | Ernst O. Fischer | Edmond H. Fischer | Val Fitch | Paul J.
    [Show full text]
  • Qnas with Venki Ramakrishnan
    QNAS QNAS QnAs with Venki Ramakrishnan Prashant Nair Science Writer For more than three and a half centuries, surprised and also touched because I came the United Kingdom’s science Academy, The here as an immigrant from the US only in Royal Society, which today occupies the 1999. I became a dual national when I ac- stately address of 6–9 Carlton House Terrace quired British citizenship in 2011, so it is the near London’s St. James’s Park, has played first time that a US citizen who is a full mem- a prominent role in shaping science policy ber of the National Academy of Sciences, in that country, offering impartial advice on rather than a foreign associate, has been scientific matters, championing research elected to this office. It shows the wonderful and education, and enabling public under- openness The Royal Society has had ever standing of science, among other functions. since its inception and is a reflection of Brit- On December 1, 2015, Venki Ramakrishnan, ish science in general, which has been hos- Deputy Director of the Medical Research pitable to people from all over the world. Council Laboratory for Molecular Biology PNAS: How does The Royal Society’sin- (LMB) in Cambridge, United Kingdom, fluence on science policy compare with that and a member of the United States Na- of the US National Academies? tional Academy of Sciences, will take the Ramakrishnan: The Royal Society is cer- reins as President Elect of this august soci- tainly comparable to the Academies in its ety of distinguished fellows. Ramakrishnan influence on national science policy.
    [Show full text]
  • Biophysics I Mar 2Th – June 16Th, 2016 Korea University
    Biophysics I Mar 2th – June 16th, 2016 Korea University Kyung Hyun Kim, Ph.D. Department of Biotechnology & Bioinformatics BK21+ Infectious Disease Research Unit KOREA UNIVERSITY [email protected] Crystal Concept • In 1611 Kepler suggested that snowflakes derived from a regular arrangement of minute brick-like units. -The essential idea of a crystal. X-rays • Discovered by Rontgen 1895 • Cause of tremendous scientific excitement. • 1,500 scientific communications within first twelve months. • US scientists repeated experiments within four weeks. The Nobel Prize in Chemistry 1907 "for his biochemical researches and his discovery of cell-free fermentation" Eduard Buchner Germany Landwirtschaftliche Hochschule (Agricultural College) Berlin, Germany b. 1860, d. 1917. Theory of Diffraction • 1910 von Laue derived theory of diffraction from a lattice. Bragg’s Law of diffraction 1912 • Diffraction observed if X-rays scattering from a plane add in phase. • Path difference D = 2d sin q. - d is the spaceing between planes & q is the angle of incidence. • Scatter in phase if path difference is nl - n is an integer & l is the X-ray wavelength. 2d sin q = n l • First structure (NaCl) in 1912. W. H. Bragg & W. L. Bragg Urease crystals ( X 728) Sumner, J. B. (1926) “ The isolation and crystallization of the enzyme urease” J. Biol. Chem. 69:435-441. The Nobel Prize in Chemistry 1946 “ for his "for their preparation of enzymes and discovery that virus proteins in a pure form" enzymes can be crystallized" James Batcheller John Howard Northrop Wendell Meredith Sumner Stanley 1/2 of the prize 1/4 of the prize 1/4 of the prize Cornell University Rockefeller Institute for Rockefeller Institute for Ithaca, NY, USA Medical Research Medical Research Princeton, NJ, USA Princeton, NJ, USA 1887-1955 1891-1987 1904-1971 1953: Double helix structure of DNA • Crick & Watson used X-ray diffraction to work out the way genes are encoded.
    [Show full text]
  • Convocation of the Fellowship of the Royal Society at the Royal Festival
    Convocation of the Fellowship As we’ve been reminded already, the Royal Society does not over-indulge in ceremonial celebrations. It of the Royal Society at the Royal is only every 50 years that we have a Convocation like this – gathering under one roof so many of our Festival Hall, 23 June 2010 Fellows and others who share the Society’s mission. We specially welcome those who have come great Address by the President, distances to be here. We’re touched by the many Lord Rees of Ludlow, OM Kt goodwill messages that we’ve received from around the world, extolling the Society’s work. Your Majesty, Your Royal Highnesses, Fellows, There are some differences between today’s Lords, Ladies and Gentlemen. programme and the 1960 event. Then, the President, Cyril Hinshelwood, spoke for a whole hour. In this On behalf of us all let me thank your Majesty soundbite era, I promise to be much more succinct, for being here today and, even more, for your albeit also less eloquent, than he was. supportive patronage of the Society throughout your reign. And let me also thank Prince William for his At the Society’s earliest meetings Christopher eloquent and thought-provoking speech. Wren, Robert Hooke, Robert Boyle, Samuel Pepys and other ‘ingenious and curious gentlemen’ (as It is 59 years since our senior Fellow His Royal they described themselves) viewed all kinds of Highness the Duke of Edinburgh was elected. experiments, sometimes rather gruesome ones – His keen involvement ever since in science, blood transfusions and the like. They peered through engineering and technology has been an immense newly-invented telescopes and microscopes; they encouragement and stimulus, not just in this country heard travellers’ tales, and dissected weird animals.
    [Show full text]
  • Nobel Prizes List from 1901
    Nature and Science, 4(3), 2006, Ma, Nobel Prizes Nobel Prizes from 1901 Ma Hongbao East Lansing, Michigan, USA, Email: [email protected] The Nobel Prizes were set up by the final will of Alfred Nobel, a Swedish chemist, industrialist, and the inventor of dynamite on November 27, 1895 at the Swedish-Norwegian Club in Paris, which are awarding to people and organizations who have done outstanding research, invented groundbreaking techniques or equipment, or made outstanding contributions to society. The Nobel Prizes are generally awarded annually in the categories as following: 1. Chemistry, decided by the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences 2. Economics, decided by the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences 3. Literature, decided by the Swedish Academy 4. Peace, decided by the Norwegian Nobel Committee, appointed by the Norwegian Parliament, Stortinget 5. Physics, decided by the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences 6. Physiology or Medicine, decided by Karolinska Institutet Nobel Prizes are widely regarded as the highest prize in the world today. As of November 2005, a total of 776 Nobel Prizes have been awarded, 758 to individuals and 18 to organizations. [Nature and Science. 2006;4(3):86- 94]. I. List of All Nobel Prize Winners (1901 – 2005): 31. Physics, Philipp Lenard 32. 1906 - Chemistry, Henri Moissan 1. 1901 - Chemistry, Jacobus H. van 't Hoff 33. Literature, Giosuè Carducci 2. Literature, Sully Prudhomme 34. Medicine, Camillo Golgi 3. Medicine, Emil von Behring 35. Medicine, Santiago Ramón y Cajal 4. Peace, Henry Dunant 36. Peace, Theodore Roosevelt 5. Peace, Frédéric Passy 37. Physics, J.J. Thomson 6. Physics, Wilhelm Conrad Röntgen 38.
    [Show full text]
  • Discovering the Secrets of Life: a Summary Report on the Archive For
    Discovering the Secrets of Life A Summary Report on the Archive for the History of Molecular Biology By Jeremy M. Norman ©April 15, 2002 The story opens in 1936 when I left my hometown, Vienna, for Cambridge, England, to seek the Great Sage. He was an Irish Catholic converted to Communism, a mineralogist who had turned to X-ray crystallography: J. D. Bernal. I asked the Great Sage: “How can I solve the secret of life?” He replied: “The secret of life lies in the structure of proteins, and there is only one way of solving it and that is by X-ray crystallography.” Max Perutz, 1997, xvii. 2 Contents 1. Introduction 1.1 The Scope and Condition of this Archive 1.2. A Unique Achievement in the History of Private Collecting of Science 1.3 My Experience with Manuscripts in the History of Science 1.4 Limited Availability of Major Scientific Manuscripts: Newton, Einstein, and Darwin 1.5 Discovering How Natural Selection Operates at the Molecular Level 1.6 Collecting the Last Great Scientific Revolution before Email 1.7. Exploring New Fields of Science Collecting 1.8 My Current Working Outline for a Summary Book on the Archive 2.Foundations for a Revolution in Biology The Quest for the Secret of Life 3. Discovering ”The First Secret of Life” The Structure of DNA and its Means of Replication 4. Discovering the Structure of RNA and the Tobacco Mosaic Virus 5. Deciphering the Genetic Code, ”the Dictionary Relating the Nucleic Acid Language to the Protein Language” 6. The Rosalind Franklin Archive 7.
    [Show full text]