ROTY08 Presented Drf8
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
The Royal Society Medals and Awards
The Royal Society Medals and Awards Table of contents Overview and timeline – Page 1 Eligibility – Page 2 Medals open for nominations – Page 8 Nomination process – Page 9 Guidance notes for submitting nominations – Page 10 Enquiries – Page 20 Overview The Royal Society has a broad range of medals including the Premier Awards, subject specific awards and medals celebrating the communication and promotion of science. All of these are awarded to recognise and celebrate excellence in science. The following document provides guidance on the timeline and eligibility criteria for the awards, the nomination process and our online nomination system Flexi-Grant. Timeline • Call for nominations opens 30 November 2020 • Call for nominations closes on 15 February 2021 • Royal Society contacts suggested referees from February to March if required. • Premier Awards, Physical and Biological Committees shortlist and seek independent referees from March to May • All other Committees score and recommend winners to the Premier Awards Committee by April • Premier Awards, Physical and Biological Committees score shortlisted nominations, review recommended winners from other Committees and recommend final winners of all awards by June • Council reviews and approves winners from Committees in July • Winners announced by August Eligibility Full details of eligibility can be found in the table. Nominees cannot be members of the Royal Society Council, Premier Awards Committee, or selection Committees overseeing the medal in question. More information about the selection committees for individual medals can be found in the table below. If the award is externally funded, nominees cannot be employed by the organisation funding the medal. Self-nominations are not accepted. -
Picture As Pdf Download
MJA Centenary — History of Australian Medicine A history of health and medical research in Australia Timothy Dyke ealth and medical research has signifi cantly con- BVSc, PhD, MBA Summary Executive Director, tributed to improvements in human health and Health and medical research has played an important Strategic Policy Group H wellbeing throughout the world, and Australia has role in improving the life of Australians since before Warwick P Anderson played its part. As a result of this research, Australians have the 20th century, with many Australian researchers PhD benefi ted by remaining healthier for longer through better contributing to important advances both locally and Chief Executive Officer internationally. treatments and improved health care, and from contribu- National Health and Medical tions to national wealth through the development of in- The establishment of the National Health and Medical Research Council, Research Council (NHMRC) to support research and Canberra, ACT. novative industries. Despite the signifi cant role of research to work to achieve the benefi ts of research for the timothy.dyke@ in Australia, there have been few specifi c compilations on community was signifi cant. nhmrc.gov.au the Australian history of health and medical research. This The NHMRC has also provided guidance in research and article is a brief overview of Australian health and medical health ethics. doi: 10.5694/mja14.00347 research, with the role of the National Health and Medical Australian research has broadened to include basic Research Council (NHMRC) as a main focus. biomedical science, clinical medicine and science, public health and health services. The early years In October 2002, the NHMRC adopted Indigenous health research as a strategic priority. -
Cambridge's 92 Nobel Prize Winners Part 2 - 1951 to 1974: from Crick and Watson to Dorothy Hodgkin
Cambridge's 92 Nobel Prize winners part 2 - 1951 to 1974: from Crick and Watson to Dorothy Hodgkin By Cambridge News | Posted: January 18, 2016 By Adam Care The News has been rounding up all of Cambridge's 92 Nobel Laureates, celebrating over 100 years of scientific and social innovation. ADVERTISING In this installment we move from 1951 to 1974, a period which saw a host of dramatic breakthroughs, in biology, atomic science, the discovery of pulsars and theories of global trade. It's also a period which saw The Eagle pub come to national prominence and the appearance of the first female name in Cambridge University's long Nobel history. The Gender Pay Gap Sale! Shop Online to get 13.9% off From 8 - 11 March, get 13.9% off 1,000s of items, it highlights the pay gap between men & women in the UK. Shop the Gender Pay Gap Sale – now. Promoted by Oxfam 1. 1951 Ernest Walton, Trinity College: Nobel Prize in Physics, for using accelerated particles to study atomic nuclei 2. 1951 John Cockcroft, St John's / Churchill Colleges: Nobel Prize in Physics, for using accelerated particles to study atomic nuclei Walton and Cockcroft shared the 1951 physics prize after they famously 'split the atom' in Cambridge 1932, ushering in the nuclear age with their particle accelerator, the Cockcroft-Walton generator. In later years Walton returned to his native Ireland, as a fellow of Trinity College Dublin, while in 1951 Cockcroft became the first master of Churchill College, where he died 16 years later. 3. 1952 Archer Martin, Peterhouse: Nobel Prize in Chemistry, for developing partition chromatography 4. -
670 Bookreviews the Journal of Nuclear Medicine
complete. I strongly (ecommend this work; it is the best, cur formedin 1982and 1983.Respectedleadersintheirfieldshave rently available book on skeletal scintigraphy. given their opinions of capability and limitations of magnetic resonance imaging and spectroscopy in clinical practice. The MYRON L. LECKLITNER bookletis mostvaluableforthosewithmoderateto significant University ofSouth Alabama experiencealready in these techniques. Mobile, Alabama The historicaloverviewchapter is meaningfulintroductory reading for scientists, physicians, and technologists at any level of backgroundand experience.However,the sevenchapters NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE AND ITS related to basic science instrumentation, flow imaging, and CLINICAL APPLICATIONS. real-time imaging have extensive mathematical and technical R.E. Steiner, G.K. Radda, Eds. New York, Churchill Liv detail and are not likely to be appreciated by most medical ingstone for the British Council, British Medical Bulletin imaging professionals, unless there has been a profound corn 40(2):113-206,1984 mitment to the understanding of the basic principles involved and/or significantexperiencein utilization of NMR instru This 93 page booklet represents a concise review ofthe state mentation. In that regard, this booklet, as a whole, is not likely of the art in 1984of recentdevelopmentsand biomedicalap to be of direct benefit to the beginner in NMR imaging or plications of nuclear magnetic resonance imaging and spec spectroscopy. At the same time, because of the summary nature troscopy.A distinguishedpanelofauthorshasbeenassembled -
JABBED PRESS KIT V15 (With Photos)
Press Kit 1 x 90 Minute Science Documentary Writer, Director, Producer: Sonya Pemberton Executive Producers: Michael Cordell, Nick Murray & Sonya Pemberton Press Kit 1 x 90 Minute Science Documentary Writer, Director, Producer: Sonya Pemberton Executive Producers: Michael Cordell, Nick Murray & Sonya Pemberton Website: http://www.sbs.com.au/shows/jabbed Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/jabbedtv Twitter: #JabbedSBS Twitter account: @JabbedTV CONTENTS Synopsis I. one line II. one paragraph III. one page Media release Publicity Quotes The Families The Experts Key crew Director’s statement Production information Contacts ©2013 Genepool Productions Pty Ltd ABN 17153091019 www.genepoolproductions.com ©2013 Genepool Productions Pty Ltd Jabbed Love, fear and vaccines. PRESS KIT 1 SYNOPSIS: one line Jabbed Love, fear and vaccines. To vaccinate, or not? What would you do to protect the ones you love? SYNOPSIS: one paragraph Jabbed Love, fear and vaccines. Diseases that were largely eradicated forty years ago are returning. Across the world children are getting sick and dying from preventable conditions because nervous parents are skipping their children’s shots. And it’s not just kids: adults, too, are being hard hit. Yet the stories of vaccine reactions are frightening, with rare cases of people being damaged, even killed, by vaccines. How do we decide whether to vaccinate or not, and what are the real risks? Jabbed, made by 2012 Emmy Award-winning Australian documentary filmmaker Sonya Pemberton, travels the globe to look at the real science behind vaccinations, tracks real epidemics, and investigates the real cost of opting out. Talking with vaccine-makers, alternative healers, psychologists, anthropologists, and parents, the film posing the potent question: what would you do to protect the ones you love? Two years in the making Jabbed will confound your expectations, whatever your position on the most important and divisive public health question of the decade. -
Crystal Vision Dorothy Hodgkin & the Nobel Prize “Few Were Her Equal in Generosity of Spirit, Breadth of Mind, Cultivated Humaneness, Or Gift for Giving
Crystal Vision Dorothy Hodgkin & the Nobel Prize “Few were her equal in generosity of spirit, breadth of mind, cultivated humaneness, or gift for giving. She should be remembered not only for a lifetime’s succession of brilliantly achieved structures. While those who knew her, experienced her quiet and modest and extremely powerful influence, learned from her more than the positioning of atoms in the three-dimensional molecule, she will be remembered not only with respect, and reverence, and gratitude, but more than anything else, with love. Let that be her lasting memorial.” Anne Sayre, in the Autumn 1995 Newsletter of the American Crystallographic Association Cover image © Emilio Segre Visual Archives/American Institute of Physics/Science Photo Library Letter from the Principal Dr Alice Prochaska, Somerville College Many remarkable woman scientists have passed through Somerville, but few rival Dorothy Hodgkin, whose path-breaking work in crystallography showed a mind not only attuned to high science but one also able to envision a crystal structure from the pattern made by its X-ray diffraction. Her ability to ‘see’ molecules such as cholesterol, penicillin, vitamin B and insulin transformed her field. 2014 sees the fiftieth anniversary of Professor Hodgkin’s Nobel prize. It is also the International Year of Crystallography, marking the 100th anniversary of Max von Laue’s Nobel Prize for Physics, awarded for his discovery that X-rays could be diffracted by crystals. That discovery underpinned Dorothy Hodgkin’s work. We are proud that Somerville supported her at a time when there was widespread opposition to married women pursuing academic careers. -
The Renaissance Society of America Annual Meeting
CHICAGO 30 March–1 April 2017 RSA 2017 Annual Meeting, Chicago, 30 March–1 April Photograph © 2017 The Art Institute of Chicago. Institute The Art © 2017 Photograph of Chicago. Institute The Art © 2017 Photograph The Renaissance Society of America Annual Meeting The Renaissance Society of America Annual Meeting Program Chicago 30 March–1 April 2017 Front and back covers: Jacob Halder and Workshop, English, Greenwich, active 1576–1608. Portions of a Field Armor, ca. 1590. Steel, etched and gilded, iron, brass, and leather. George F. Harding Collection, 1982.2241a-h. Art Institute of Chicago. Contents RSA Executive Board .......................................................................5 RSA Staff ........................................................................................6 RSA Donors in 2016 .......................................................................7 RSA Life Members ...........................................................................8 RSA Patron Members....................................................................... 9 Sponsors ........................................................................................ 10 Program Committee .......................................................................10 Discipline Representatives, 2015–17 ...............................................10 Participating Associate Organizations ............................................. 11 Registration and Book Exhibition ...................................................14 Policy on Recording and Live -
MRI of Short and Ultrashort T2 and T2* Components of Tissues, Fluids
The British Journal of Radiology, 84 (2011), 1067–1082 REVIEW The Agfa Mayneord lecture: MRI of short and ultrashort T2 and T2* components of tissues, fluids and materials using clinical systems G M BYDDER, FRCR Department of Radiology, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA ABSTRACT. A variety of techniques are now available to directly or indirectly detect signal from tissues, fluids and materials that have short, ultrashort or supershort T2 or T2* components. There are also methods of developing image contrast between tissues and fluids in the short T2 or T2* range that can provide visualisation of anatomy, which has not been previously seen with MRI. Magnetisation transfer methods can now be applied to previously invisible tissues, providing indirect access to supershort T2 Received 7 April 2011 components. Particular methods have been developed to target susceptibility effects Revised 29 April 2011 and quantify them after correcting for anatomical distortion. Specific methods have Accepted 30 June 2011 also been developed to image the effects of magnetic iron oxide particles with positive contrast. Major advances have been made in techniques designed to correct for loss of DOI: 10.1259/bjr/74368403 signal and gross image distortion near metal. These methods are likely to substantially ’ 2011 The British Institute of increase the range of application for MRI. Radiology It is a pleasure to thank the president and members extensively on neuroradiology, obstetrics and gynaecol- of the council of the British Institute of Radiology for ogy, as well as image perception. the opportunity to honour the memory of Professor During the first year of clinical MRI, only steady-state Mayneord, who had a pivotal role in founding medical free precession (SSFP), mobile proton density (rm) and T1 physics in the UK [1, 2]. -
In the Nano World
UK invests in the nano world by Paula Gould The Engineering and Physical Sciences Research The EPSRC has identified the ‘nano world’ as one of its Council (EPSRC) is one of seven agencies that priority areas for funding over the next few years. distributes funding for research and postgraduate This decision reflects the growth in investment that the Council has already pledged – or, indeed, spent – training on behalf of the UK government. The EPSRC on projects involving dimensions and tolerances in invests around £500 million ($800 million) each year, the range 0.1 nm to 100 nm (Table 1). Funds for with a view to sustaining and enhancing the UK’s nano-research are drawn from separate EPSRC science and technology base. The Council’s support Programmes, reflecting the underpinning and for nanoscience and nanotechnology has almost interdisciplinary nature of the subject (Table 2). The tripled over the past four years. This is partly the Materials Programme has played a particularly result of targeted funding schemes, but also the significant role in supporting this work. Today’s appearance of more ‘nano’ proposals in the standard research into areas such as molecular self-assembly, novel patterning techniques, precision metrology grant applications. The EPSRC now boasts a tools, nanostructured materials, and electro- substantial and diverse research portfolio in mechanical systems could form the building blocks of nanoscience and nanotechnology. tomorrow’s materials science and engineering. There are two main routes though which the EPSRC invests in nanoscience and technology: ‘strategic’ and ‘responsive mode’ funding. The distribution of strategic funding is in line with deliberate policies to support certain areas or activities, and generally follows a specific call for proposals. -
Vancouver Institute: an Experiment in Public Education
1 2 The Vancouver Institute: An Experiment in Public Education edited by Peter N. Nemetz JBA Press University of British Columbia Vancouver, B.C. Canada V6T 1Z2 1998 3 To my parents, Bel Newman Nemetz, B.A., L.L.D., 1915-1991 (Pro- gram Chairman, The Vancouver Institute, 1973-1990) and Nathan T. Nemetz, C.C., O.B.C., Q.C., B.A., L.L.D., 1913-1997 (President, The Vancouver Institute, 1960-61), lifelong adherents to Albert Einstein’s Credo: “The striving after knowledge for its own sake, the love of justice verging on fanaticism, and the quest for personal in- dependence ...”. 4 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION: 9 Peter N. Nemetz The Vancouver Institute: An Experiment in Public Education 1. Professor Carol Shields, O.C., Writer, Winnipeg 36 MAKING WORDS / FINDING STORIES 2. Professor Stanley Coren, Department of Psychology, UBC 54 DOGS AND PEOPLE: THE HISTORY AND PSYCHOLOGY OF A RELATIONSHIP 3. Professor Wayson Choy, Author and Novelist, Toronto 92 THE IMPORTANCE OF STORY: THE HUNGER FOR PERSONAL NARRATIVE 4. Professor Heribert Adam, Department of Sociology and 108 Anthropology, Simon Fraser University CONTRADICTIONS OF LIBERATION: TRUTH, JUSTICE AND RECONCILIATION IN SOUTH AFRICA 5. Professor Harry Arthurs, O.C., Faculty of Law, Osgoode 132 Hall, York University GLOBALIZATION AND ITS DISCONTENTS 6. Professor David Kennedy, Department of History, 154 Stanford University IMMIGRATION: WHAT THE U.S. CAN LEARN FROM CANADA 7. Professor Larry Cuban, School of Education, Stanford 172 University WHAT ARE GOOD SCHOOLS, AND WHY ARE THEY SO HARD TO GET? 5 8. Mr. William Thorsell, Editor-in-Chief, The Globe and 192 Mail GOOD NEWS, BAD NEWS: POWER IN CANADIAN MEDIA AND POLITICS 9. -
Does the Bbc Help Cultivate a Pro-Gmo Agenda in the Uk?
DOES THE BBC HELP CULTIVATE A PRO-GMO AGENDA IN THE UK? Results of an open survey, June 8-13, 2015 Beyond GM, London www.beyond-gm.org EXECUTIVE SUMMARY A recent BBC Panorama programme, entitled GM Food – Cultivating Fear, suggested that opposition to GMOs is “morally unacceptable” and that those who oppose GMOs are prone to “making things up” instead of relying on facts and sound science. In the days following the programme there was considerable criticism about its narrative and the way that it framed the issues in support of a particular and partial point of view. It was in this context that Beyond GM endeavoured to provide a space, however limited, for broader public comment by undertaking a survey and gathering comments which explores the views of an informed public. At the heart of this enquiry were some very basic questions: Does the BBC help cultivate a pro-GM agenda in the UK? and How adequately and respectfully are public concerns about genetic modification in food and farming represented by the BBC? The survey was conducted online between 8th and 13th June 2015. There were 1000 respondents; 49.3% men and 50.6% women, and with an age spread typical of that of the UK as a whole. Respondents were made up of individuals from both sides of the GMO debate and represented a spectrum from those who believe that GMOs are necessary and beneficial to those who believe that GMOs are unnecessary and risky. Within this spectrum there was also a ‘middle ground’; those who felt GMOs were either ‘potentially beneficial’ or ‘potentially harmful’. -
Review of the Year 2009/10
Invest in future scientific leaders and in innovation Review of the year 2009/10 1 Celebrating 350 years Review of the year 2009/10 02 Review of the year 2009/10 President’s foreword Executive Secretary’s report Review of the year 2009/10 03 Contents President’s foreword ..............................................................02 Inspire an interest in the joy, wonder Executive Secretary’s report ..................................................03 and excitement of scientific discovery ..................................16 Invest in future scientific leaders and in innovation ..............04 Seeing further: the Royal Society celebrates 350 years .......20 Influence policymaking with the best scientific advice ........08 Summarised financial statements .........................................22 Invigorate science and mathematics education ...................10 Income and expenditure statement ......................................23 Increase access to the best science internationally ..............12 Fundraising and support ........................................................24 List of donors ..........................................................................25 President’s Executive foreword Secretary’s report This year we have focused on the excellent This has been a remarkable year for the Society, our opportunity afforded by our 350th anniversary 350th, and we have mounted a major programme not only to promote the work of the Society to inspire minds, young and old alike, with the but to raise the profile of science