TOCC0380DIGIBKLT.Pdf
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
ARTHUR FARWELL: PIANO MUSIC, VOLUME THREE by Lisa Cheryl Thomas When Arthur Farwell, in his late teens and studying electrical engineering at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, heard Schubert’s ‘Unfnished’ Symphony for the frst time, he decided that he was going to be not an engineer but a composer. Born in St Paul, Minnesota, on 23 March 1872,1 he was already an accomplished musician: he had learned the violin as a child and ofen performed in a duo with his pianist elder brother Sidney, in public as well as at home; indeed, he supported himself at college by playing in a sextet. His encounter with Schubert proved detrimental to his engineering studies – he had to take remedial classes in the summer to be able to pass his exams and graduated in 1893 – but his musical awareness grew rapidly, not least though his friendship with an eccentric Boston violin prodigy, Rudolph Rheinwald Gott, and frequent attendances at concerts of the Boston Symphony Orchestra (as a ‘standee’: he couldn’t aford a seat). Charles Whitefeld Chadwick (1854–1931), one of the most prominent of the New England school of composers, ofered compositional advice, suggesting, too, that Farwell learn to play the piano as soon as possible. Edward MacDowell (1860–1908), perhaps the leading American Romantic composer, looked over his work from time to time – Farwell’s fnances forbade regular study with such an eminent man. But he could aford counterpoint lessons with the organist Homer Albert Norris (1860–1920), who had studied in Paris with Dubois, Gigout and Guilmant, and piano lessons with Tomas P. Currier (1855–1929), a piano teacher and student and associate of MacDowell’s. Making his base in a pleasant attic room in Boston, Farwell was now set up to begin his new calling. 1 A detailed account of Farwell’s life and work can be found in Evelyn Davis Culbertson, He Heard America Singing: Arthur Farwell – Composer and Crusading Music Educator, Composers of North America, No. 9. Te Scarecrow Press, Metuchen (New Jersey), 1992. 2 Playing with other talented musicians was an obvious source of pleasure, and he spent the summer of 1896 at Lake Owasco, one of the eleven Finger Lakes in upstate New York, at the home of Tomas Osborn, his brother’s employer and himself a gifed pianist. Osborn enjoyed Farwell’s company enough to invite him on an all-expenses- paid tour of Europe, taking in Bayreuth and Nuremberg before continuing to Vienna, enjoying the concerts and operas on ofer and visiting a number of landmarks in the lives of Beethoven and Schubert. In autumn 1897, while still in Germany, Farwell sought out Engelbert Humperdinck, then 43 and at the height of his fame; Humperdinck looked over some of Farwell’s music and agreed to take him on as a student. Osborne then went back to America and Farwell stayed on in a pension in Boppard am Rhein, where Humperdinck lived at that time. Humperdinck, who refused to accept any money for lessons from Farwell all winter, took him along on work-engagements to Heidelberg and Frankfurt. ‘Te lessons were informal: I went up whenever I had sufcient work to show’, Farwell later wrote. ‘We would spend several hours over it, and my teacher-host would usually serve cofee and cigars, and sometimes a glass of yellow Marsala’.2 In March 1898 Farwell went to Berlin with Humperdinck, who had to be there to prepare for the frst performance of his opera Königskinder. It was here that Humperdinck introduced Farwell to some of his personal friends, two of whom would infuence the young composer: Hans Pftzner and James Grun, the poet who was then writing the libretto of Pftzner’s second opera, Die Rose vom Liebesgarten. Farwell spent the next fve months in Berlin, during which time Grun helped Farwell achieve a more spontaneous means of expression. Composition lessons with Pftzner, though valuable in the longer term, were a trial at the time: Farwell’s inexperience exasperated the intense and opinionated Pftzner, who made little attempt to disguise his impatience. Te pressure was such that Farwell’s health failed and, afer spending the frst part of the summer back in Boppard, he retreated to England to recuperate and to work on his Italian: the Humperdincks were intending to go to Italy in the winter of 1898, and Farwell was going to continue his studies with his teacher there. Meeting Humperdinck in Paris, he discovered that 2 Arthur Farwell, ‘Wanderjahre of a Revolutionist’ and Other Essays on American Music, ed. Tomas Stoner, University of Rochester Press, Rochester, 1995, p. 53. 3 the planned Italian trip was no longer on the cards, and so he decided to stay in Paris to study with Alexandre Guilmant. He returned to America in 1899 and to a lectureship at Cornell University, remaining on the staf there for two years.3 It was then that, in a bookshop in Boston, he discovered in Alice Fletcher’s Indian Story and Song,4 the transcriptions of Indian melodies which so sparked his interest that they set him on the path by which he is chiefy remembered today. Farwell had been fascinated with Indian music and life since boyhood, when his father used to take him on family vacations to a Sioux village in Minnesota, on the shores of Lake Superior. But it wasn’t until a year afer his encounter with Fletcher’s book, when looking at the original Omaha melodies without the harmonisation John Comfort Fillmore had added to Fletcher’s transcriptions, that Farwell realised the compositions he had written since his Damascene moment made more sense when he used the melodies only and abandoned the European harmonies imposed on them. It was then, too, that he felt the obligation to preserve the original cultural setting of the melodies he chose for his pieces. But Farwell’s reputation as an Indianist5 – which he soon grew to resent – has obscured what he achieved as a composer in his own right: his Indianist works account for only around ten per cent of his published output of well over one hundred opus numbers (for example, he also had a keen literary sense and wrote a series of Symbolistic Studies for orchestra). It is a persistent trait of Farwell’s music that it fows true to life, in that it is a living, breathing artwork, unpredictable, with constantly changing tempi, dyamics, expressions, moods and phrasing. Piano Sonata, Op. 113 (1949) Op. 113 is Farwell’s only sonata for solo piano, since an early Sonata in E fat, Op. 6, from 1899, is unfnished: one movement was completed, and since notes from a lecture 3 Just before taking up his position at Cornell, Farwell returned to Lake Owasco, enjoying a camping holiday on the eastern shore. Te experience resulted in a piano suite, Owasco Memories, Op. 8, published by the Wa-Wan Press in 1907. 4 Small, Maynard and Co., Boston, 1900. 5 For a detailed history of the Indianist movement, cf. my booklet essay with the frst release in this series of recordings, Toccata Classics tocc 0126. 4 the planned Italian trip was no longer on the cards, and so he decided to stay in Paris to recital Farwell gave on 25 March 1903 state that he played an Adagio from a Sonata in study with Alexandre Guilmant. E fat, it is presumed to be this same piece. Farwell composed two other late sonatas: one He returned to America in 1899 and to a lectureship at Cornell University, remaining for solo violin in G minor, Op. 96, in 1934, and another for cello and piano, Op. 116, in on the staf there for two years.3 It was then that, in a bookshop in Boston, he discovered 1950. Te Piano Sonata of 1949 was premiered on a radio performance on WQXR on in Alice Fletcher’s Indian Story and Song,4 the transcriptions of Indian melodies which 16 April 1975, in a programme called Listening Room, presented by Robert Sherman, so sparked his interest that they set him on the path by which he is chiefy remembered which focussed on Farwell’s music; the performer was Neely Bruce. Another guest on today. Farwell had been fascinated with Indian music and life since boyhood, when the programme, the musicologist Gilbert Chase, commented: his father used to take him on family vacations to a Sioux village in Minnesota, on the Tis sonata bears no resemblance, certainly no emulating resemblance, to any of the shores of Lake Superior. But it wasn’t until a year afer his encounter with Fletcher’s contemporary currents of that time. It seems to me that it took a man of great character book, when looking at the original Omaha melodies without the harmonisation John and great individuality to do that. When you think of how diferent it is from his early Comfort Fillmore had added to Fletcher’s transcriptions, that Farwell realised the works, you realize that here was a man who had a tremendous capacity for development compositions he had written since his Damascene moment made more sense when he and growth in every way – not only in spiritual ways but also creatively.6 used the melodies only and abandoned the European harmonies imposed on them. It was then, too, that he felt the obligation to preserve the original cultural setting of the Neely Bruce, the performer, felt that the sonata has a ‘technical ruthlessness surprising melodies he chose for his pieces. in a composer known chiefy as an arranger of Indian melodies’ – which was the kind But Farwell’s reputation as an Indianist5 – which he soon grew to resent – has of reputation Farwell fought for all his life.