DOCSLIB.ORG

Overview: Making of Empire

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Overview: Making of Empire Studying the Ottomans: Section 2: Ottomans in the Modern World (19th -early 20th C.) Revolution in the Caliphate: Intellectuals and Islam - which way forward? Nov. 14-16 Young Ottomans Implementation of Tanzimat Reforms: - largely unsuccessful - too ‘radical’ for many (traditional groups, older elite classes) - too moderate for those shaped by early 19th c. reforms (even later ‘rescript’ 1856) 1865: gathered secretly, formed Young Ottoman Society (‘Patriotic Alliance’) in Istanbul Young Ottomans Young Ottomans: - wanted to be distinguished from ‘Tanzimat’ reformers - wanted more than ‘reformed’ Ottoman Empire --- wanted ‘Ottoman Nation’: constitution, democracy - strongly influenced ideologically by European (especially French) ideals ‘democracy’ - but also tied to closely to ‘conservative’ Islam Young Ottomans Disagreed on ‘methods’: - some in favour of ‘terrorist’ tactics - some in favour of ‘working from within’ government - some in favour of converting Sultan to new ideas BUT: all agreed on ‘principles’ and need to overturn current regime Young Ottomans Established newspaper ‘ Hurriyet’ (freedom, liberation): - published articles, editorials on the ‘Muslim Ottoman’ - identified with non-ethnic based notion of ‘state’ (Ottoman) that was simultaneously ‘Islamic’ - understood that this would alienate non-Muslims in the ‘empire’ but many were already in rebellion…. Young Ottomans Attracted distrust of ulama and government: - succeeded in having ministers appointed, influential journalists, some clerics: helped bring Abdul Hamid II to power 1876 [following two depositions] - critical moment : ‘Eyes of Europe’ in Istanbul to discuss future of Balkans - used ‘moment’ to push through first Ottoman Constitution - Sultan succeeded in appearance as ‘western’, ‘modern’ Young Ottomans Abdul Hamid II: - autocrat attracting much criticism (from Young Ottomans) - also astute politician: -put constitution in place when it served his purpose (1876) - revoked it when it did not (1878) - political group divided; some stayed but most went into exile - by 1878, movement had ceased to have influence Young Ottomans [Armajani & Ricks, 170-2] “The Young Ottomans were perhaps the first ideologists of Islam in modern times who tried to take the ‘best of the West’ and graft it onto Islam. They failed because their picture of the purity of the Medina Caliphate was a figment of their imaginations” …. Young Ottomans … In Islam the principle of paying allegiance to a newly elected caliph was a prerogative of only a few, and the idea of consultation was to strengthen the government for the people and not by them…. Government is most certainly of God and not of the people.” Young Ottomans Who was the typical Young Ottoman? - son of highly placed family - educated in new, secular schools - frustrated in attempts to advance to highest government circles - party’s opposition reflected both personal self-interest and genuine philosophy . Young Ottomans While in exile (Europe, many in Paris): - mainly supported by personal, family money - political parties associated with Young Ottomans as well as several, sympathetic newspapers funded by Egyptian Prince, Mustafa Fazil - both (parties, papers) reflected his convictions - also his desire to blackmail Ottoman government into making him governor Young Ottomans Young Ottomans: - writings had great effect on those who wished change - many ‘Young Turks’ had origins in this intellectual movement Young Ottomans (19th C) Young Turks c.1907-8 Young Turks Abdulhamid II: - immediately introduced restrictive policies, soon revoked first constitution; developed ‘spy’ system - led to new political objectors: - Jewish intellectuals, secret societies, publications - other ‘heirs’ to Young Ottomans 1889: - students Imperial Medical Academy instigated conspiracy - plot uncovered; most fled to Paris “Three Policies” (1904) (Editor’s Introduction, slightly modified): - Akcura's Uc Tarz-i Siyaset appeared in newspaper TURK, 1904 (Nos. 24-34) Cairo (British ‘Protectorate’) - result of censorship in Istanbul - work reprinted 1912 in Istanbul as pamphlet [important point in analyzing impact of work] Yusuf Akcura (1876-1935) Document gives political view from ‘the margin’: - Ackura originally from Russian territory - grew up, schooled Military College Istanbul - Attended Erkan-i Harbiye (General Staff Course) - prestigious, necessary to climb military ladder Yusuf Akcura (1876-1935) Accused of belonging to secret society opposed to government: - exiled Libya (Fezzan – desert oases) - 1899: escaped - spent next four years in Paris - 1903: returned to Russia, wrote ‘Three Policies’ Yusuf Akcura, 1900 … and c. 1931 Yusuf Akcura (1876-1935) Three ‘visions’ for future: - Ottoman Nationalism - Pan-Islamism -Turkish Nationalism Drew on 19th c. roots: - critiqued each in terms of identity issues, domestic politics, international/imperial agenda [for Discussion, Friday Nov. 16] Young Turks 1906: - Discontented army corps officers formed secret society ‘vatan’ (in Macedonia): Mustapha Kemal (future ‘Ataturk’) among them 1907: - Young Turks merged with other groups (including vatan): founded Committee of Union and Progress (CUP) - stood for strong central government, exclusion foreign influence Mustapha Kemal, 1906 Young Turks - army corps joining with CUP: ‘key development’ - ‘real power’ joined ‘ideological fervor’ to achieve common goal ‘Young Turk’ revolution ultimately generated from practical, not intellectual stimulus Young Turks Principal aim: - restoration Constitution 1876-8 (revoked by Abdul Hamid II) - 1908: led coup d'état against Sultan - responded by reinstituting Constitution - launched ‘counter revolution’: supremacy of Sultan and sharia (Islamic law) - army supported CUP: Abdul Hamid II deposed, replaced by Mehmed V Young Turks Opposition: - other exiled radicals formed “League of Private Initiative and Decentralization” - favoured more European assistance, decentralized government Both Groups Influential Public Demonstration, Istanbul 1908 Young Turks “Proclamation” of 1908: - announced the revolution [see “The Young Turks: Proclamation for the Ottoman Empire, 1908” in ‘Additional Readings’. How ‘different’ was this from earlier- generation radicals? Compare with 1904 analysis, ‘Three Policies’…[discussion document] . How do you think different nationalities would react… and why?] Declaration of Young Turk Revolution (by leaders of Ottoman ‘millets’) Postcard Commemorating Constitution of 1908 Young Turks Initial problem: expediency of coalition - army corps’ desire for power not supportive of ideological goals of revolution Exacerbated by: - Arab nationalists ‘flourishing’ in European exile (two distinct groups, each with newspapers, wanting Arab-Turkish government) [lecture Nov. 26] - consolidation further delayed by Balkan Wars (1912-13) which cost state all European lands (except between Edirne and Istanbul) [lecture Nov. 19] Government not under ‘Young Turk’ control until 1913 Young Turks New Government in 1913: Domestic front - positive, progressive reforms - provincial administration (more centralized) - improved education (all groups, including women) - fully secularized legal-system - industrialization Young Turks Domestic Policy: - Forward looking - Responding to long-standing ‘issues’ So… in short term, was revolution successful? [reference: in-class discussion of Proclamation 1908] Young Turks Final Answer Lies with Examination Foreign policy: - alliance with Germany in WWI proved disastrous - brought a real end to empire - on the other hand, created conditions for rise of ‘Ataturk’, and Birth of Modern Turkey: - is this how we should measure ‘long-term’ success of Revolution of 1908?.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • ENVIRONMENT of CULTURE and ART in the OTTOMAN EMPIRE in 19Th CENTURY
    The Online Journal of Science and Technology - April 2018 Volume 8, Issue 2 ENVIRONMENT OF CULTURE AND ART IN THE OTTOMAN th EMPIRE IN 19 CENTURY Nesli Tuğban YABAN Baskent University, Department of Public Relations and Publicity, Ankara-Turkey [email protected] Abstract: Westernisation and modernisation of the Ottoman Empire began to burgeon in the 17th century; it became evident in the 18th century and the 19th century witnessed the most intense interaction and the exact reconstruction process. New way of living which was originated in Europe and representatives thereof became influential as guides and determinants of reconstruction process in the Ottoman Empire. It is possible to point out that the Ottoman Empire which got closer to France for handling military problems, to England for industrialisation purposes and to Italy for architecture and arts had intense communication and the resulting interaction with European states in the course of reconstruction process. This study aims to give information about the social, cultural and artistic environment in the Ottoman Empire during the reign of Sultan Abdul Hamid II (1876-1909). Key Words: Culture, Art, Ottoman Empire, Sultan Abdul Hamid II. General View of the Environment of Culture and Art in 19th Century in the Ottoman Empire It is clear that sultans had a very important role in the ruling of the country as a part of state system of the Ottoman Empire thus, good or bad functioning of the state and events and actions which might affect the society from various aspects were closely connected to personality, behaviours and mentality of the sultan.
    [Show full text]
  • Can You List and Date the Losses of the Ottoman Empire Between 1683 -1914? the Correct Answer Is (B) False Islamic Principals ( Quran and Hadith ) Was Used To
    Egypt , Iran and Turks The Nineteenth Century MES 20 Reflections on the Middle East Prof. Hesham Issa Mohammed Abdelaal History and Conflicts Ottoman (Turkey) I Egypt I Qujar (Iran) I i>Clicker Questions Lecture and Reading Intent outcomes: Concepts in this session Knowledge The era Of Transformation! 1.The decline of the Ottoman Empire:! • Militating against the centralization of state authority! • List the Names of effective persons in the 19th • The westernization of Ottoman Empire. ! • Internal Decays and the Janissaries ! century Turkey, Egypt, Iran. • The French expedition to Egypt ! • Turkey Reform in the 19th century! • Summarize the political reform in the Middle • The Tanzemat! • Young Ottomans and Young Turks! 2.Egypt Reform in the 19th century ! east 19th Century. • Muhammed Ali Pasha Era and the urban reform! • The British Occupation ! • Describe the reasons for the decline of • The Nationalism period ! 3.Iran reforms in the 19th century ! • Change in Iranian Shi’ism after the Safavids and the rise of " Ottoman empire. Qujar density and the Ulama! • The effect of European Imperialism ! Comprehension • The Constitutional Revolution The decline of the Ottoman Empire Can you List and date the Losses of the Ottoman Empire between 1683 -1914? The correct answer is (B) False Islamic principals ( Quran and Hadith ) was used to During the four empires (Umayyad, Abbasid, Ottoman, Safavid) rule. the Caliph in each empire invoked a divine status. A.True B.False Notes of importance to be considered While Watching documentaries •The Reasons for decline •The Relation between Religion and the state. •The European Imperial Intervention •The Political economical and social reform The decline of the Ottoman Empire Egypt Reform in the 19th century ! Mohammed Ali Pasha Era (Ottoman Empire) ! Ottoman (Turkey) I Egypt I Qujar (Iran) I i>Clicker Questions Group Discussion In the nineteenth Century, Ottoman (Turkey) , Egypt, Qujar (Iran), were faced by dramatic change between the challenging slow decline, reform and European Imperial intervention.
    [Show full text]
  • Images of the Ottoman Empire: the Photograph Albums Presented by Sultan Abdulhamid Ii
    IMAGES OF THE OTTOMAN EMPIRE: THE PHOTOGRAPH ALBUMS PRESENTED BY SULTAN ABDULHAMID II MUHAMMAD ISA WALEY ONE of the treasures of the British Library's Turkish collections is the magnificent set of fifty-one ornately bound albums, containing in all over i,8oo photographs (albumen prints), which the Ottoman Sultan Abdlilhamid II presented to the British Museum in 1893 and were received in 1894. (An almost identical set was given to the United States Library of Congress in the same years.) The contents represent a carefully picked selection from the vast photographic collection amassed by the Sultan, whose complete archive of over 33,000 prints is preserved at the Istanbul University Library. The gift was designed to show the Sultan, sovereign of a still considerable territory with a great history, as a reforming and enlightened ruler. Abdlilhamid II was an extraordinary figure and can be seen from many different viewpoints. It is not always easy for the reader to believe that the comprehensive character assassination by Sir Edwin Pears,^ the slightly romantic, perhaps over-protective account by Joan Haslip,^ and the quasi-hagiography by the Turkish writer Necip Fazil Kisakurek^ all really concern the same man. In fact, there is abundant scope and material for further research on the Sultan and the events of his reign, which lasted from 1876 to 1909. His photographs will surely play a part in that process. The volumes of mounted photographs range in size from about 25 x 30 to 30 x 40 cm. They are beautifully bound in very dark green morocco adorned with the insignia of Sultan Abdtilhamid II inlaid in red, green and black edged with gold.
    [Show full text]
  • Ottoman Travel
    Brief history and culture of Turkey and Balkan areas under the former Ottoman Empire An Empire before its time? Or An Empire doomed to fail? Which do you think makes a better government… one that is accepting and tolerant of people who are different or one that encourages, by force if necessary its people to be the same in order to create a more unified nation? Find the connections between history and current culture Because… Like it or not; realize it or not, we are all affected by the past Pay attention to notes that have a ** These are things that are going to influence/affect the Ottomans or modern day culture Ottoman empire began in modern day Turkey People are descendants of pastoral nomadic tribes from Central Asia In 10th century these tribes begin to move east Called themselves Oguz called Turkomans/“Turks” by their enemies Raiding of weaker neighbors (esp. the Byzantines) was common No formal govt. or laws ◦ Temporary leadership in the form of “Hans” Tribal society** ◦ loyalty, bravery family and hospitality important Shamanistic beliefs** ◦ Nature worship ◦ Man was powerless ◦ Good & evil spirits Invaded Persia in the 11th Century and conquered Bagdad Became mercenary guards for the Abbasid caliphs in Bagdad and protected them against outside threats Tugrul Bey became protector of the faith and champion of Orthodox Islam Seljuk rule spread to Central Asia, Palestine, Iraq and northern Iran Alp Arslan extended Seljuk rule into Syria, Armenia and sent raids into Anatolia (alarmed Byzantines) Battle of
    [Show full text]
  • Episode in Anglo-Ottoman History: British Relief to ‘93 Refugees (1877-78)
    A “COMPASSIONATE” EPISODE IN ANGLO-OTTOMAN HISTORY: BRITISH RELIEF TO ‘93 REFUGEES (1877-78) A Master’s Thesis by SAD ĐYE SENA D ĐNÇYÜREK DEPARTMENT OF HISTORY BILKENT UNIVERSITY ANKARA June 2010 To Serra and Seva... A “COMPASSIONATE” EPISODE IN ANGLO-OTTOMAN HISTORY: BRITISH RELIEF TO ‘93 REFUGEES (1877-78) The Institute of Economics and Social Sciences of Bilkent University by SAD ĐYE SENA D ĐNÇYÜREK In Partial Fulfilment of the Requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF ARTS in THE DEPARTMENT OF HISTORY BĐLKENT UNIVERSITY ANKARA June 2010 I certify that I have read this thesis and have found that it is fully adequate, in scope and in quality, as a thesis for the degree of Master of Arts in History. --------------------------------- Assistant Prof. Oktay ÖZEL Supervisor I certify that I have read this thesis and have found that it is fully adequate, in scope and in quality, as a thesis for the degree of Master of Arts in History. --------------------------------- Assistant Prof. Evgeni RADUSHEV Examining Committee Member I certify that I have read this thesis and have found that it is fully adequate, in scope and in quality, as a thesis for the degree of Master of Arts in History. --------------------------------- Assistant Prof. Nur Bilge CRISS Examining Committee Member Approval of the Institute of Economics and Social Sciences --------------------------------- Prof. Dr. Erdal EREL Director ABSTRACT A “COMPASSIONATE” EPISODE IN ANGLO-OTTOMAN HISTORY: BRITISH RELIEF TO ‘93 REFUGEES (1877-78) Dinçyürek, Sadiye Sena M.A., Department of History Supervisor: Assistant Prof. Oktay Özel June 2010 This thesis aims to provide an indebt analysis of the British relief to the Ottoman Refugees of 1877-78 Russo-Turkish War (’93 Refugees).
    [Show full text]
  • Indian Muslims, Ottoman Empire and Caliphate During Colonial Period
    International Journal of Business and Social Science Vol. 6, No. 2; February 2015 Indian Muslims, Ottoman Empire and Caliphate during Colonial Period Salih Pay Associate Professor Department of History of Islam, Faculty of Theology Uludağ University, Bursa Turkey Abstract Indian Muslim is a term applied for Muslims living in the Indian Subcontinent comprised of the modern day states of India, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Myanmar and Sri Lanka. India witnessed the first Muslim raids during the era of the Rashidun, and permanent dominance of Islam began in the Umayyad period upon the conquest of Sindh. Nevertheless, it was Turkish Muslim states, from Ghaznavids to Mughals, which ensured the spreading of Islam in other regions. In the 15th century, the Portuguese were the first to arrive on Indian coasts, before they were subject to raids by Western colonialist states such as Holland, England and France. By the middle of the 19th century, India entirely fell under the British rule. In those days, under guidance of their scholars and leading personalities, Indian Muslims looked for ways to get rid of the British rule. Besides, they provided both moral and material support so that the Ottoman Empire, as the only independent state within Islamic world, and the Caliphate [Khilafat] survive without surrendering to the British or other colonial dominance. The objective of this study is to analyze how Muslims in the Indian Subcontinent who were totally deprived of independence as a British colony, paid close attention to the Ottomans and the Caliphate. Keywords: Islamic World, Indian Muslims, Ottoman Empire, Caliphate, English Colonialism Introduction Indian Subcontinent, also known as South Asia, includes modern states of India, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Myanmar and Sri Lanka.
    [Show full text]
  • ROMA Ve BİZANS ETÜDLER VE SİSTEMATİK ESERLER
    ROMA ve BİZANS ETÜDLER VE SİSTEMATİK ESERLER ALBERT, GOTTFRIED: Die Prinzeninsel Antigoni und der Aidos- Berg. Konstantinopel, O. Keil, [1891]. s. 24-51. (15.5x22). “Mitteilungen des Deutschen Excursions Clubs, Heft III”. [I.RB/E-367] ANGOLD, MICHAEL: Church and society in Byzantium under the Comneni, 1081-1261. Cambridge, Cambridge University, 1995. XVI+604 s. (15.5x23.5). [I.RB/E-388] BALARD, MİCHEL - DUCELLIER, ALAIN (Der.) : Konstantinopolis 1054-1261. Hırıstiyanlığın başı, Latinlerin avı, Yunan başkenti. İstanbul, İletişim, 2002. 256 s. (16x23). “İletişim Yay.: 842 - Dünya Şehirleri Dizisi: 6”. [I.RB/E-405] BARSANTI, CLAUDIA : Constantinopoli e l’Egeo nei primi decenni del XV secolo: la testimonianza di Cristoforo Buondelmonti. s. 83-254. (21x29). Roma, Rivista dell’Istituto Nazionale d’Archeologia e Storia dell’arte, 56 (III. Serie, XXIV), 2001’den. Fotokopidir. [I.RB/E-407] BARTUSIS, MARK C.: The late Byzantine army: arms and society, 1204-1453. Philadelphia, University of Pennsylvania Press, 1992. XVII+438 s. (15x23) resim. “The Middle Ages Series”. [I.RB/E-408] 1 BASSETT, SARAH GUBERTI : Historiae custos: Sculpture and tradition in the Baths of Zeuxippos. s. 491-506. (21x29.5) plan, resim. American Journal of Archaeology Volume, 100, No: 3/1996’dan. Fotokopidir. [I.RB/E-391] BELGE, MURAT : Bizans mirası. Foto.: Şemsi Güner. s. 86-102. (22x30) resim. Atlas dergisi, 1994, (Sayı 17)’de. [I.RB/E-392] BOOJAMRA, JOHN LAWRENCE : Church reform in the late Byzantine Empire. A study for the patriarchate of Athanasios of Constantinople. Thessaloniki, Patriarchal Institute for Patristic Studies, 1983. 239 s. (18x25). “Analekta Vlatadon, 35”. [I.RB/E-362] BRADFORD, ERNLE : The great betrayal.
    [Show full text]
  • The Impact of Ethnic Cleansing and the Eurocentric International System on the Entrance of the Ottoman Empire Into the Great War, 1878-1914
    City University of New York (CUNY) CUNY Academic Works School of Arts & Sciences Theses Hunter College Fall 1-5-2018 The Impact of Ethnic Cleansing and the Eurocentric International System on the Entrance of the Ottoman Empire into the Great War, 1878-1914 Parker Lake CUNY Hunter College How does access to this work benefit ou?y Let us know! More information about this work at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu/hc_sas_etds/251 Discover additional works at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu This work is made publicly available by the City University of New York (CUNY). Contact: [email protected] The Impact of Ethnic Cleansing and the Eurocentric International System on the Entrance of the Ottoman Empire into the Great War, 1878-1914 by Parker J. Lake Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts History, Hunter College The City University of New York January 5, 2018 Thesis Sponsor: Date Signature January 5, 2018 Professor Karen M Kern Date Signature of Second Reader January 5, 2018 Professor Jonathan Rosenberg Table of Contents 1. Introduction……..………………………..……………………………………..……....1 2. Chapter 1……………………………………………………………….………..….....14 3. Chapter 2…………………………………………………………….…….….…….....37 4. Chapter 3…………………………………………………………….………..……….57 5. Chapter 4………………………………………………………….……….…….…….71 6. Conclusion…………...…………………………………………….………….…...….85 Appendix A……………………………………..……….………………………….……89 Appendix B…………………………………………..……………………….…….……90 Appendix C………………………………………………..………………….…….……91 Bibliography…………………………………………………..…………..……….……..92 1 Introduction The Ottoman Empire entered the First World War on the November 1, 1914, after three months of continuous appeals to both camps of the belligerent powers.1 The actions of the Great Powers (Germany, Austria-Hungary, Russia, France, and Great Britain) over the course of the late nineteenth and early twentieth century had placed the Ottoman Empire in a precarious position.
    [Show full text]
  • Freemasonry in Turkey
    Extract from World of Freemasonry (2 vols) Bob Nairn FREEMASONRY IN TURKEY Introduction The history of Freemasonry in Turkey is interwoven with its turbulent political history and the gradual decline of the Ottoman Empire, which was a world power during the 18th and 19th centuries and the spiritual and legal centre of the Muslim world. See Appendix A. The decline of the Ottoman Empire was an integral cause of an on-going debate in the Islamic world regarding the role of Muslim law, and, as Muslim Freemasons were directly involved in the political fortunes of the Ottoman Empire, this history is important to an understanding of various Muslim attitudes towards the Craft. Political Change in the Ottoman Empire – 1299-1923 The Ottoman Empire in the 16th and 17th centuries included Anatolia, the Middle East, parts of North Africa, and much of south-eastern Europe to the Caucasus. Constantinople (Istanbul) became the capital of the Ottoman Empire following its capture from the Byzantine Empire in 1453. For a list of the Caliphs of the Ottoman Empire see appendix B. During this period, the Ottoman Empire was among the world's most powerful political entities, with Eastern Europe constantly wary of its steady expansion through the Balkans and the southern part of the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth. Its navy was also a powerful force in the Mediterranean. On several occasions, the Ottoman army invaded central Europe, laying siege to Vienna in 1529 and again in 1683, and was only finally repulsed by great coalitions of European powers at sea and on land. It was the only non- European power to seriously challenge the rising power of the West between the 15th and 20th centuries, to such an extent that it became an integral part of European balance-of-power politics.
    [Show full text]
  • Abdul Hamid II Gift Books on Microfilm
    AbdulHamid II Gift Books on Microfilm Trend Report Target: ORGANIZATION AND MAINTENANCE OF THE COLLECTIONS Sultan Hamid II Microfilm Collection Microfilm no Title Author Imprint Date LCCN Call Number Language Subject Lugat-I Tarihiye ve Historical and 4009 Cografiye Rifat, Ahmet 1883 Ottoman Turkish geography 4010 Muahedat Mecmuasi 1878-1882 Ottoman Turkish 4011 Tarih-i Ata Tayyarzade, Ahmet Ata 1877 Ottoman Turkish History 4012 Amerika Tarih-i Kesfi Robertson 1881 Ottoman Turkish American History 4013 Nakt El Tevarih Rifat Efendi 1879 4014 Mutehabat-i Rifat Pasa 1875 Ottoman Turkish 4015 Engizisyon Esrari H. Nazim 1880 Ottoman Turkish French, Ottoman 4016 Nehiv-i Franseyi Poitevin, M. P. 1885 Turkish French grammar 4017 Su Azmi-Besim kardeslar 1884 Ottoman Turkish Irrigation Serhli Usul-u 4018 Muhakemat-I Cezaiye Ziya 1884 Ottoman Turkish Criminal justice 4019 Kainat Mithat, Ahmet 1873 Ottoman Turkish World history 1 AbdulHamid II Gift Books on Microfilm Microfilm no Title Author Imprint Date LCCN Call Number Language Subject Kavaid-I Esaiye-I 4020 Harbiye Rifat, Mehmet Topculuk Fenni 4021 Hulasasi Nesip, Abdurrahman 1876 Ottoman Turkish 4022 Sururi Mecmuasi Cevdet, Ahmet 1883 Ottoman Turkish 4023 Trabzon Tarihi Sakir, S. 1878 Ottoman Turkish Trabzon history Istanbul-Mekteb-I 4024 Fununu Harbiye-I Refik 1883 Ottoman Turkish 4025 Kave Sami, Semsettin 1877 Ottoman Turkish Coffee Guzide-i Tarih-i 4026 Osmani Muhtar, Ahmet 1888 Ottoman Turkish History 4027 Endaht Bahsi Refik, Ahm 1878 Ottoman Turkish Harekat-I Cesime-I 4028 Askeriye Ethem, Ibrahim 1880 Ottoman Turkish Military Askeriye, Uhuvvet-I 4029 Askeriye Sureyya, E. Ottoman Turkish Military Turkish, English, English, French, 4030 Tefhim-i El-lisan Muzaffer 1884 French Turkish grammar Tatbikattan Sabit 4031 Kopruler Leclerc Ottoman Turkish 4032 Meftah-ul Hendese Ragip, Ahmet 1884 Ottoman Turkish 4033 Kainat Mithat, Ahmet 1876-1882 Ottoman Turkish Mecelle-I Ahkam-I 4034 Adliye Cevdet, Ahmet P.
    [Show full text]
  • 1908: Coup D'état Or Revolution?
    1908: COUP D’ÉTAT OR REVOLUTION? QIs the Second Constitutionalist Period a revolution or a coup d’état? Hasan SUNGUR* ow important is it to characterize a historic event? Naming the events that took place in 1908, in the Ottoman Empire as “Coup d’état” or “Revolution” is a standpoint and an evaluation problem. History Hclasses are generally taught by way of reducing different points of view to one, and evaluations are carried out through ambiguous criteria. Innovative history teachers are aware of the need to find more evidence and the creation of more qualitative arguments in order to look at historical events from different points of view. These teachers know that the students are more capable of understanding different points of view than they are given credit for. They encourage their students to develop their arguments based on evidence and defend these arguments in a democratic framework. With the “1908” event, students will find the opportunity to have big group discussions in the light of above said criteria. INTENDED LEARNING OUTCOMES QQ All students: will identify the changes that the Second Constitutionalist Period brought. QQ Most students: will understand the causes and results of societal and political changes resulting from the Second Constitutionalist Period. QQ Some students: will evaluate the societal and political changes that were caused by the Second Constitutionalist Period from different perspectives. Grade: 11 Time: 80 minutes. Preparation Key Question: Make copies of the worksheets according to the number of groups. Is The Second Constitutionalist Period a revolution or a coup d’état? The Aim of the Lesson: Using resources to evaluate the Second Constitutional Period from societal and political points of view.
    [Show full text]
  • 'Boxer Uprising' in China and the Pan-Islamic Policy Of
    103 VOL. 3, NO. 1, JUNE 2018: 103-117 https://doi.org/10.22679/avs.2018.3.1.103 THE ‘BOXER UPRISING’ IN CHINA AND THE PAN-ISLAMIC POLICY OF THE OTTOMAN EMPIRE FROM A EUROPEAN PERSPECTIVE By HEE SOO LEE* This article aims to examine European reactions against the Ottoman mission head- ed by Enver Pasha, who was dispatched to China during the ‘Boxer Uprising’ in 1901. Based on Western archival documents, we can find reliable and informative correspondence about the attitude of the European countries toward the sultan’s mission and its pan-Islamic plans in China. The coming of the Ottoman mission caused great reaction in such European countries as Britain, France, Germany and Russia, who were engaged in a competitive power struggle for an influential political and economic position in China. They kept a close watch on the sultan’s envoy to find out his secret mission on the one hand and tried to persuade Enver Pasha not to work against their advantage in China on the other. From time to time, Abdul Hamid II (r. 1876-1909), the sultan of the Otto- man Empire, sent China an official mission and secret agents, through whom he tried to subjugate Chinese Muslims for his own advantage1. The significance for the * HEE SOO LEE is a professor in the Department of Cultural Anthropology at Hanyang University, South Korea. 1 Abdul Hamid II came to power at the most critical period in Ottoman history, when he faced a lot of internal and external problems such as economic difficulties, struggles for independence among his minority ethnic groups, and the divide-and-share-out policy of the European powers against the Otto- 104 Acta Via Serica, Vol.
    [Show full text]