DOCSLIB.ORG

Color Constancy: Surface Color from Changing Illumination

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Color Constancy: Surface Color from Changing Illumination JOSA COMMUNICATIONS Communications are short papers. Appropriate material for this section includes reports of incidental research results, comments on papers previously published, and short descriptions of theoretical and experimental tech- niques. Communications are handled much the same as regular papers. Galley proofs are provided. Color constancy: surface color from changing illumination Michael D'Zmura Department of CognitiveSciences and Irvine Research Unit in Mathematical Behavioral Sciences, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, California 92717 Received September 5, 1991; revised manuscript received October 30, 1991; accepted November 13, 1991 Viewing the lights reflected by a set of three or more surfaces, a trichromatic visual system can recover three color-constant descriptors of reflectance per surface if the color of the surfaces' illuminant changes. This holds true for a broad range of models that relate photoreceptor, surface, and illuminant spectral properties. Changing illumination, which creates the problem of color constancy, affords its solution. INTRODUCTION spectral power distributions. Changing illumination both introduces the problem color constancy Land's best-known demonstrations of and per- of color constancy in- mits its solution. volve changing the illumination of a Mondrian display comprising many distinctly colored surfaces.",2 Although changing the chromatic properties of the Mondrian il- BILINEAR MODELS luminant alters the chromatic properties of the lights The following analysis depends reflected toward the viewer, the perceived colors of on knowledge of accu- rate finite-dimensional linear models for surface reflec- Mondrian surfaces hardly change at all. This constancy tances'15- and illuminants"-" and their relationship of surface color exhibits the ability of the visual system to photoreceptoral spectral sensitivity. Such models to derive, from reflected lights, accurate descriptors of exist and find much application in studies of color con- surface-color properties that do not depend on circum- 3 7 0 9 stancy. - 1 " -23 A particular stances of illumination. combination of photorecep- tors and models for ref lectances and illuminants provides Theoretical work has focused on the problem of estimat- a bilinear model,22 23 fundamental to the analysis, ing surface and illuminant chromatic properties that is in the derived as follows. case in which a set of surfaces is viewed under a single When an n-dimensional model for reflectances is used, illuminant.'' 0 Maloney and Wandell established a gen- a reflectance function R(A) that falls within the span of eral result for this situation6 : A trichromatic visual sys- the model is a linear combination of n linearly indepen- tem viewing surfaces under a single unknown illuminant dent basis functions Rj(A),j = 1, . , n: that is represented by three color descriptors'"- 3 can re- cover, at best, two color-constant descriptors per surface. n R(A) = >riR(A). The theory of color constancy rests incomplete, however, 1 (1) j= for neither surface-color percepts54 nor surface-color prop- erties' 5 ' 8 are described adequately by two-dimensional The n coefficients rj are the color-constant descriptors of models. Three descriptors per surface are required.1 2 surface-color properties provided by the model. An illu- The premise of the present study is that color constancy minant A(A) that falls within the span of an m-dimensional is not an issue for color perception unless the chromatic model for illuminants with linearly independent basis properties of illumination change. It is natural to ask functions Ai(A),i = 1,... , m, is expressed similarly: whether the lights from a set of surfaces viewed under two or more distinct illuminants, as in Land's demonstra- m A(A) = IaiAi(A). (2) tions, permit the visual system to estimate accurately i=1 both the unknown surface-color properties and the un- Light reflected from known illuminants. This is so; a trichromatic visual a surface with reflectance R(A) viewed under illuminant system can recover three accurate color descriptors for A(A) is the product of the two functions and has the following each unknown surface and for each illuminant when three model decomposition: or more surfaces are viewed under two or more lights in m n turn. This holds true for a variety of combinations of L(A) = A(A)R(A) = 2 ajrjA(A)Rj(A). (3) photoreceptor spectral sensitivities, three-dimensional i=1 j=1 models for describing the variation among surfaces' color- The quantum catch q of the kth photoreceptoral type in a constant reflectance properties, and three-dimensional p-chromatic system, k = 1,... ,p, is given by the integral models for describing the variation among illuminants' (over the visible spectrum) of the product of the kth mecha- 0740-3232/92/030490-04$05.00 ( 1992Optical Society of America JOSA Communications Vol. 9, No. 3/March 1992/J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 491 nism's spectral sensitivity Qk(A)and the light L(A): matic system that views s surfaces under v illuminants: 700 nm qk= Qk(A)L(A)dA d = E rt>Cja. (8) 400 nm j=1 700nm m n = |J400nmQk(A) [>> airjAi(A)Rj(A) dA. (4) The intuition behind this system of equations is like 400nm i=l j=l that underlying the results of Maloney and Wandell. In the case of a trichromatic system, that is, provided with To bring descriptors outside the integrals in Eq. (4), use two views of three surfaces (p = m = n = 3, = 2, s = the bilinear model matrices Bj, j = 1,..., n, with enti-ies 3), the three data vectors d, d , and d3 span a three- bjki given by the following integral: 2 dimensional subspace of R,6 the orientation of this sub- 700nm space in R6is determined uniquely by the two illuminants, biki =J Qk(A)Ai(A)Rj(A)dA. (5) and the position within this subspace of a data vector 400 nm from a particular surface corresponds uniquely to a par- Equation (4) in this form reads ticular reflectance. The aim is to invert this system [Eq. (8)] by using the n m data vectors and the known, model-dependent matrices C. qk = 2 rjbjkiai. (6) to provide both the s reflectances (represented by a ma- j=l i=1 trix R with entries rtj) and the v illuminants (represented This equation expresses the bilinear dependence of quan- by the vm-dimensional vector a) up to an arbitrary posi- tum catches on reflectance and illuminant descriptors.'9 2 tive scalar. With p = m = n = s, the matrix R holding the unknown reflectance descriptors and the matrices Cj are square; suppose further that these are nonsingular. RECOVERY FROM MULTIPLE VIEWS The reflectance matrix R then has an inverse with en- To include the effect of view, suppose that the sur- tries Pjt, where j = 1, . ., n, and t = 1, . , s, that satisfy face with descriptors rj is lit, in turn, by v illuminants s a,, w = 1,...,v, where a = [awl...awm] (T for trans- pjt dt = Ca. (9) pose). One may order the vp quantum catches to form t=l a data vector d = [ql... q1p,... .ql... q, T and the vm il- luminant descriptors to form an illumination vector a = Setting D = [d1... d,] and p = [pjl... pj,]T, the system [all. ...aim...avi... av.]T. Thedata are related to theillu- [Eq. (9)] entails Cj-1 Dpj = a. In terms of thepv x s ma- minants by a reflectance-weighted linear combination of trix Ej = Cj-'D, one has the n-matrix equations block-diagonal matrices Cj, in which each of v blocks along the diagonal is Bj: C = diag[Bj, ... ,Bj]. The re- Ejpj = a, j = 1,...,n. (10) lations among data, illuminants, and surface reflectance are then described by Taking differences for successive values of the indexj, one finds the n - 1 equations EhPh - Eh+l Ph+l = 0. To com- n bine these, define p = [lT* .PnT]T and construct the ma- d= >r 1Ca. (7) j=l trix F, which has n - 1 x n blocks, each of which matches the size of the Eh, namely, pv x s, by placing in the diago- Introducing s surfaces with reflectances rt, t = 1, . ., s, nal blocks F the matrices E>, placing in the adjacent provides s data vectors d, that hold the catches of ap-chro- blocks FU,,,, the matrices -EU+1, and placing zeros in Table 1. Tested Components Photoreceptor Illuminant Basis Reflectance Basis 2 5 6 5 7 Smith and Pokorny : L, M, S CIE daylight basis""'13: S0 , Sl S2 Cohen's basis' : I, II, III (natural surfaces,' 6 (human RGB; also CIE Judd-modified (daylight, Northern Hemisphere) Munsell chips' ) 1931 standard observer3) 26 8 Hurvich and Jameson : R-G, Y-B, VA Dixon's daylight basis2: E, V1,V 2 Parkkinen et al.'s basis' : 41, 02, 03 (human color-opponent model; (daylight, Southern -Hemisphere) (Munsell chips) also CIE 1931 standard observer'3) CIE 1964 supplemental observer3: CIE illuminants3: A, D65, F2 Fourier-series expansion on interval of visible xl0, Y1o,z10 (human large-field (indoor lighting: tungsten, daylight, and wavelengths: the first three functions'9 standard observer) fluorescent sources) Sony XC-711: R, G, B (CCD camera) Fourier-series expansion on interval of visible wavelengths: the first three functions'9 Sony XC-007: R, G, B (CCD camera) 492 J. Opt. Soc. Am. A/Vol. 9, No. 3/March 1992 JOSA Communications all the other entries. The single system that results is dimensional perception of a body undergoing motion.2 9 homogeneous: Likewise, while a single view of a Mondrian permits, without further assumptions,7 a two-dimensional repre- Fp= 0. (11) sentation of surface color,6 further views can lead, in principle, to the perception of stable, three-dimensional Thus the vector p, which is determined solely by the surface colors under changing lights.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Rethinking Color Cameras
    Rethinking Color Cameras Ayan Chakrabarti William T. Freeman Todd Zickler Harvard University Massachusetts Institute of Technology Harvard University Cambridge, MA Cambridge, MA Cambridge, MA [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Abstract Digital color cameras make sub-sampled measurements of color at alternating pixel locations, and then “demo- saick” these measurements to create full color images by up-sampling. This allows traditional cameras with re- stricted processing hardware to produce color images from a single shot, but it requires blocking a majority of the in- cident light and is prone to aliasing artifacts. In this paper, we introduce a computational approach to color photogra- phy, where the sampling pattern and reconstruction process are co-designed to enhance sharpness and photographic speed. The pattern is made predominantly panchromatic, thus avoiding excessive loss of light and aliasing of high spatial-frequency intensity variations. Color is sampled at a very sparse set of locations and then propagated through- out the image with guidance from the un-aliased luminance channel. Experimental results show that this approach often leads to significant reductions in noise and aliasing arti- facts, especially in low-light conditions. Figure 1. A computational color camera. Top: Most digital color cameras use the Bayer pattern (or something like it) to sub-sample 1. Introduction color alternatingly; and then they demosaick these samples to create full-color images by up-sampling. Bottom: We propose The standard practice for one-shot digital color photog- an alternative that samples color very sparsely and is otherwise raphy is to include a color filter array in front of the sensor panchromatic.
    [Show full text]
  • Spatial Filtering, Color Constancy, and the Color-Changing Dress Department of Psychology, American University, Erica L
    Journal of Vision (2017) 17(3):7, 1–20 1 Spatial filtering, color constancy, and the color-changing dress Department of Psychology, American University, Erica L. Dixon Washington, DC, USA Department of Psychology and Department of Computer Arthur G. Shapiro Science, American University, Washington, DC, USA The color-changing dress is a 2015 Internet phenomenon divide among responders (as well as disagreement from in which the colors in a picture of a dress are reported as widely followed celebrity commentators) fueled a rapid blue-black by some observers and white-gold by others. spread of the photo across many online news outlets, The standard explanation is that observers make and the topic trended worldwide on Twitter under the different inferences about the lighting (is the dress in hashtag #theDress. The huge debate on the Internet shadow or bright yellow light?); based on these also sparked debate in the vision science community inferences, observers make a best guess about the about the implications of the stimulus with regard to reflectance of the dress. The assumption underlying this individual differences in color perception, which in turn explanation is that reflectance is the key to color led to a special issue of the Journal of Vision, for which constancy because reflectance alone remains invariant this article is written. under changes in lighting conditions. Here, we The predominant explanations in both scientific demonstrate an alternative type of invariance across journals (Gegenfurtner, Bloj, & Toscani, 2015; Lafer- illumination conditions: An object that appears to vary in Sousa, Hermann, & Conway, 2015; Winkler, Spill- color under blue, white, or yellow illumination does not change color in the high spatial frequency region.
    [Show full text]
  • Color Constancy and Contextual Effects on Color Appearance
    Chapter 6 Color Constancy and Contextual Effects on Color Appearance Maria Olkkonen and Vebjørn Ekroll Abstract Color is a useful cue to object properties such as object identity and state (e.g., edibility), and color information supports important communicative functions. Although the perceived color of objects is related to their physical surface properties, this relationship is not straightforward. The ambiguity in perceived color arises because the light entering the eyes contains information about both surface reflectance and prevailing illumination. The challenge of color constancy is to estimate surface reflectance from this mixed signal. In addition to illumination, the spatial context of an object may also affect its color appearance. In this chapter, we discuss how viewing context affects color percepts. We highlight some important results from previous research, and move on to discuss what could help us make further progress in the field. Some promising avenues for future research include using individual differences to help in theory development, and integrating more naturalistic scenes and tasks along with model comparison into color constancy and color appearance research. Keywords Color perception • Color constancy • Color appearance • Context • Psychophysics • Individual differences 6.1 Introduction Color is a useful cue to object properties such as object identity and state (e.g., edibility), and color information supports important communicative functions [1]. Although the perceived color of objects is related to their physical surface properties, M. Olkkonen, M.A. (Psych), Dr. rer. nat. (*) Department of Psychology, Science Laboratories, Durham University, South Road, Durham DH1 3LE, UK Institute of Behavioural Sciences, University of Helsinki, Siltavuorenpenger 1A, 00014 Helsinki, Finland e-mail: [email protected]; maria.olkkonen@helsinki.fi V.
    [Show full text]
  • Fast Fourier Color Constancy
    Fast Fourier Color Constancy Jonathan T. Barron Yun-Ta Tsai [email protected] [email protected] Abstract based techniques in computer vision, both problems reduce to just estimating the “best” illuminant from an image, and We present Fast Fourier Color Constancy (FFCC), a the question of whether that illuminant is objectively true color constancy algorithm which solves illuminant esti- or subjectively attractive is just a matter of the data used mation by reducing it to a spatial localization task on a during training. torus. By operating in the frequency domain, FFCC pro- Despite their accuracy, modern learning-based color duces lower error rates than the previous state-of-the-art by constancy algorithms are not immediately suitable as prac- 13 − 20% while being 250 − 3000× faster. This unconven- tical white balance algorithms, as practical white balance tional approach introduces challenges regarding aliasing, has several requirements besides accuracy: directional statistics, and preconditioning, which we ad- Speed - An algorithm running in a camera’s viewfinder dress. By producing a complete posterior distribution over must run at 30 FPS on mobile hardware. But a camera’s illuminants instead of a single illuminant estimate, FFCC compute budget is precious: demosaicing, face detection, enables better training techniques, an effective temporal auto exposure, etc, must also run simultaneously and in real smoothing technique, and richer methods for error analy- time. Spending more than a small fraction (say, 5 − 10%) sis. Our implementation of FFCC runs at ∼ 700 frames per of a camera’s compute budget on white balance is impracti- second on a mobile device, allowing it to be used as an ac- cal, suggesting that our speed requirement is closer to 1 − 5 curate, real-time, temporally-coherent automatic white bal- milliseconds per frame.
    [Show full text]
  • 38 Color Constancy
    38 Color Constancy DAVID H. BRAINARD AND ANA RADONJIC Vision is useful because it informs us about the physical provide a self-contained introduction, to highlight environment. In the case of colm~ two distinct functions some more recent results, and to outline what we see are generally emphasized (e.g., Jacobs, 1981; Mollon, as important challenges for the field. We focus on key 1989). First, color helps to segment objects from each concepts and avoid much in the way of technical devel­ other and the background. A canonical task for this opment. Other recent treatments complement the one function is locating fruit in foliage (Regan et al., 2001; provided here and provide a level of technical detail Sumner & Mollon, 2000). Second, color provides infm' beyond that introduced in this chapter (Brainard, 2009; mation about object properties (e.g., fresh fish versus Brainard & Maloney, 2011; Foster, 2011; Gilchrist, 2006; old fish; figure 38.1). Using color for this second func­ Kingdom, 2008; Shevell & Kingdom, 2008; Smithson, tion is enabled to the extent that perceived object color 2005; Stockman & Brainard, 2010). correlates well with object reflectance properties. Achieving such correlation is a nontrivial requirement, MEASURING CONSTANCY however, because the spectrum of the light reflected from an object confounds variation in object surface The study of constancy requires methods for measuring reflectance with variation in the illumination (figure it. The classic approach to such measurement is to 38.2; Brainard, Wandell, & Chichilnisky, 1993; Hurl­ assess the extent to which the color appearance of bert, 1998; Maloney, 1999). In particular, the spectrum objects varies as they are viewed under different illumi­ of the reflected light is the wavelength-by-wavelength nations.
    [Show full text]
  • Color Blindness Fovea
    Color Theory • Chapter 3b Perceiving Color • Color Constancy • Chapter 3 Perceiving Color Theory Color (so far) • Lens • Iris • Rods • Cones x3 • Fovea • Optic Nerve • Iodopsin & Rhodopsin • Chapter 3 Color Theory Perceiving Color (today) • Tri-Chromatic theory of color vision • Color Afterimage • Opponent Theory of color vision • Color Constancy • Monet’s series • Color Blindness Fovea • A tiny (1mm) area on the retina is covered with a dense collection of cones. • This region is where we see color distinctions best. Seeing Color • Still no proven model of how color perception works. • Cones contain light-sensitive pigments called Iodopsin. • Iodopsin changes when light hits it -- it is photo- sensitive. Light is effectively converted/translated into a nerve impulse…a signal to the brain. Trichromatic Theory & Opponent Theory • 19th c. Trichromatic Theory first proposed the idea of three types of cones. • Current theory -- Opponent Theory -- is that there are three types of iodopsin -- one that senses (or “sees”) red light, one that sees green, and one blue-violet. Each is “blind” to its complement. • We then combine the information from all three to perceive color. • We have mostly red- and green- sensitive cones – few blue-sensitive ones. • Diagram of suspected “wiring” of cones to ganglion Cones to Color (nerve) cells. • Light primaries are “read” individually, then results are combined. Cones to Color • Diagram of suspected trichromatic “wiring” of cones to ganglion (nerve) cells. • Light primaries are “read” individually, then results are combined. • http://www.handprint.com/HP /WCL/color1.html Opponent Processing • “As the diagram shows, the opponent processing pits the responses from one type of cone against the others.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 7: Perceiving Color
    Chapter 7: Perceiving Color -The physical dimensions of color -The psychological dimensions of color appearance (hue, saturation, brightness) -The relationship between the psychological and physical dimensions of color (Trichromacy Color opponency) - Other influences on color perception (color constancy, top-down effects) Sir Isaac Newton Newton’s Prism Experiment (1704) White light is composed of multiple colors Light Monochromatic light : one wavelength (like a laser) Physical parameters for monochromatic light 1. Wavelength 2. Intensity Heterochromatic light : many wavelengths (normal light sources) For heterochromatic light The spectral composition gives the intensity at each wavelength Monochromatic light Heterochromatic light Spectral composition of two common (heterochromatic) illuminants The spectral components of light entering the eye is the product of the illuminant and the surface reflectance of objects. Reflectance of some common surfaces and pigments 350 400 450 500 550 600 650 700 750 800 Surface reflectance of some common objects 350 400 450 500 550 600 650 700 750 800 Spectral composition of light entering the eye after being reflected from a surface = Spectral composition of the Reflectance of the surface illuminant X Consider a ripe orange illuminated with a bright monochromatic blue (420 nm) light. What color will the banana appear to be? a. bright orange b. dark/dim orange Blue (monochromatic) c. black d. dark/dim blue Relative amount of light of amount Relative Wavelength Spectral composition of light entering the
    [Show full text]
  • Color Appearance Models Second Edition
    Color Appearance Models Second Edition Mark D. Fairchild Munsell Color Science Laboratory Rochester Institute of Technology, USA Color Appearance Models Wiley–IS&T Series in Imaging Science and Technology Series Editor: Michael A. Kriss Formerly of the Eastman Kodak Research Laboratories and the University of Rochester The Reproduction of Colour (6th Edition) R. W. G. Hunt Color Appearance Models (2nd Edition) Mark D. Fairchild Published in Association with the Society for Imaging Science and Technology Color Appearance Models Second Edition Mark D. Fairchild Munsell Color Science Laboratory Rochester Institute of Technology, USA Copyright © 2005 John Wiley & Sons Ltd, The Atrium, Southern Gate, Chichester, West Sussex PO19 8SQ, England Telephone (+44) 1243 779777 This book was previously publisher by Pearson Education, Inc Email (for orders and customer service enquiries): [email protected] Visit our Home Page on www.wileyeurope.com or www.wiley.com All Rights Reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, scanning or otherwise, except under the terms of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 or under the terms of a licence issued by the Copyright Licensing Agency Ltd, 90 Tottenham Court Road, London W1T 4LP, UK, without the permission in writing of the Publisher. Requests to the Publisher should be addressed to the Permissions Department, John Wiley & Sons Ltd, The Atrium, Southern Gate, Chichester, West Sussex PO19 8SQ, England, or emailed to [email protected], or faxed to (+44) 1243 770571. This publication is designed to offer Authors the opportunity to publish accurate and authoritative information in regard to the subject matter covered.
    [Show full text]
  • Naming Versus Matching in Color Constancy
    Perception & Psychophysics 1991,50 (6), 591-602 Naming versus matching in color constancy JIMMY M. TROOST and CHARLES M. M. DE WEERT Nijmegen Institute for Cognition Research and Information Technology, University ofNijmegen Nijmegen, The Netherlands In this paper, a replication of the color-constancy study of Arend and Reeves (1986) is reported. and an alternative method is presented that can be used for the study of higher order aspects of color constancy, such as memory, familiarity, and perceptual organization. Besides a simulta­ neous presentation of standard and test illuminants, we also carried out an experiment in which the illuminants were presented successively. The results were similar to Arend and Reeves's; however, in the object-matching condition of the successive experiment, we found an over­ estimation, instead of an underestimation, of the illuminant component. Because the results of matching experiments are difficult to interpret, mainly due to their sensitivity to instruction effects, we introduced another type of color-constancy task. In this task, subjects simply named the color of a simulated patch. It was found that, by applying such a task, a reliable measure of the degree of identification of object color can be obtained. Color constancy is the phenomenon that the color ap­ Sensory explanations of color constancy are mechanis­ pearance of objects is invariant, notwithstanding varia­ tic; informational cues to the illuminant are not taken into tions in illumination. In real-life situations, variations in account. It is implicitly assumed that the visual system illumination occur very often. For example, the spectral does not even notice differences in illumination.
    [Show full text]
  • Evolution, Development and Function of Vertebrate Cone Oil Droplets
    REVIEW published: 08 December 2017 doi: 10.3389/fncir.2017.00097 Evolution, Development and Function of Vertebrate Cone Oil Droplets Matthew B. Toomey* and Joseph C. Corbo* Department of Pathology and Immunology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, United States To distinguish colors, the nervous system must compare the activity of distinct subtypes of photoreceptors that are maximally sensitive to different portions of the light spectrum. In vertebrates, a variety of adaptations have arisen to refine the spectral sensitivity of cone photoreceptors and improve color vision. In this review article, we focus on one such adaptation, the oil droplet, a unique optical organelle found within the inner segment of cone photoreceptors of a diverse array of vertebrate species, from fish to mammals. These droplets, which consist of neutral lipids and carotenoid pigments, are interposed in the path of light through the photoreceptor and modify the intensity and spectrum of light reaching the photosensitive outer segment. In the course of evolution, the optical function of oil droplets has been fine-tuned through changes in carotenoid content. Species active in dim light reduce or eliminate carotenoids to enhance sensitivity, whereas species active in bright light precisely modulate carotenoid double bond conjugation and concentration among cone subtypes to optimize color discrimination and color constancy. Cone oil droplets have sparked the curiosity of vision scientists for more than a century. Accordingly, we begin by briefly reviewing the history of research on oil droplets. We then discuss what is known about the developmental origins Edited by: of oil droplets. Next, we describe recent advances in understanding the function of oil Vilaiwan M.
    [Show full text]
  • Color Vision Theory; Vision, Low-Level Are Opposite to Each Other, Would Cancel
    Color Vision (e.g., spatial frequency, orientation, motion, depth) which the stimulus differs perceptually from a purely within a local cortical region. With respect to color achromatic (i.e., white, gray, black) axis. The third vision per se, the primary processing involves separ- dimension is brightness or lightness. That our per- ating color and luminance information, and further ceptual space is three-dimensional reflects the basic separating changes due to the illuminant from those trichromacy of vision. due to visual objects, by lateral interactions over large A normal observer can describe the hue of any light regions. (disregarding surface characteristics) by using one or To separate luminance and color information, the more of only four color names (red, yellow, green, and outputs of Pc cells are combined in two different ways. blue). These so-called unique hues form two opponent When their outputs are summed in one way, the pairs, red–green and blue–yellow. Red and green luminance components to their responses sum and the normally cannot be seen in the same place at the same color components cancel. Summed in a different time; if unique red and unique green lights are added in combination, the color components sum and the appropriate proportions, the colors cancel and one luminance components cancel. Consider a striate sees a neutral gray. Orange can be seen as a mixture of cortex cell that combines inputs from one or more red and yellow, and purple as a mixture of red and j j Lo and Mo cells in a region. The cortical cell would blue, but there is no color seen as a red–green mixture respond to luminance variations but not to color (or as a blue–yellow mixture).
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 3 Color Constancy
    Chapter 3 Color Constancy In the previous chapter I gave an introduction to fundamental theories of color vision. These theories referred to stimuli that were viewed in isolation. A cen- tral issue within this framework was the assignment of primary color codes to isolated light stimuli. Hitherto we discussed the color appearance of such stimuli only marginally. In this chapter we will extend the examined stimulus to com- plex spatial patterns that contain more than one light. We will see that the color appearance of light stimuli in this context is not determined by corresponding primary color codes. Rather, the color appearance of a given light depends on temporal and spatial characteristics of the stimulus. We can study the influence of the context on the color appearance of a stimulus when we present two differ- ent lights either sequentially or spatially (as a center-surround configuration) to the observer. The corresponding phenomena are called successive contrast and simultaneous contrast. In this chapter we will focus on a related phenomenon that refers to color appearance of fixed objects under varying lighting conditions. This phenomenon is known as color constancy. Loosely speaking, color constancy is described as the ability of visual systems to assign stable color appearance to a fixed object under changing illuminant conditions. 3.1 The Problem of Color Constancy 3.1.1 Introduction Probably the most important function of human color vision is object recognition. In this sense, the color appearance of an object should persist with changes of the illumination. We can experience this phenomenon every day but we rarely notice it.
    [Show full text]