Does Treatment of Non-Malignant Hypertension Reduce the Incidence of Renal Dysfunction? a Meta-Analysis of 10 Randomised, Controlled Trials

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Does Treatment of Non-Malignant Hypertension Reduce the Incidence of Renal Dysfunction? a Meta-Analysis of 10 Randomised, Controlled Trials Journal of Human Hypertension (2001) 15, 99–106 2001 Nature Publishing Group All rights reserved 0950-9240/01 $15.00 www.nature.com/jhh ORIGINAL ARTICLE Does treatment of non-malignant hypertension reduce the incidence of renal dysfunction? A meta-analysis of 10 randomised, controlled trials CY Hsu Division of Nephrology, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA Objective: It remains controversial whether non-malig- dysfunction outcome varied among trials but within nant ‘benign’ hypertension causes renal dysfunction. each trial was applied similarly to both treatment and The effect of lowering blood pressure on the incidence control groups. Drug treatment consisted mostly of of renal dysfunction among patients with non-malignant diuretics and adrenergic blockers. Overall, treated hypertension is not clear. This meta-analysis was con- patients had lower blood pressure and fewer cardio- ducted to determine whether antihypertensive drug vascular events. There were a total of 317 cases of renal therapy reduces the incidence of renal dysfunction in dysfunction. Patients randomised to antihypertensive patients with non-malignant hypertension. therapy (or more intensive therapy) did not have a sig- Methods: Randomised, controlled trials of antihyperten- nificant reduction in their risk of developing renal dys- confidence interval %95 ;0.97 ؍ sive drug therapy of more than 1 year duration that function (relative risk .(0.77 ؍ reported renal dysfunction as an outcome were iden- (CI) 0.78–1.21; P tified through MEDLINE search and literature review. A Conclusions: Among patients with non-malignant random effects model was used to obtain summary esti- hypertension enrolled in randomised trials, treated mates. patients did not have a lower risk of renal dysfunction. Results: Ten trials were identified, involving 26 521 indi- The 95% CI suggests that a 25% or more true protective viduals and 114 000 person-years. All excluded subjects effect of antihypertensive drugs is unlikely. with advanced baseline renal disease. Definition of renal Journal of Human Hypertension (2001) 15, 99–106 Keywords: therapy; high blood pressure; kidney disease Introduction lowering blood pressure decreases the incidence of renal dysfunction among patients with non-malig- It remains controversial whether non-malignant nant hypertension is a randomised controlled trial. 1–5 ‘benign’ hypertension causes renal dysfunction. However, renal disease has not been a major focus in Although elevated blood pressure predicts subsequent 6,7 the large traditional antihypertensive drug treatment development of end-stage renal disease, it is poss- trials. Furthermore, there are too few renal end- ible that pre-existing renal disease caused both the 8,9 points within any one study to provide sufficient hypertension and the eventual renal failure. power and to make definitive conclusions. There- The effect of lowering blood pressure on the inci- fore, this meta-analysis was conducted to integrate dence of renal dysfunction among patients with the results of previous trials into a more precise esti- non-malignant hypertension is also not known. mate of treatment effect. Specifically, it asks Some observational studies have shown that for whether in randomised, controlled trials, drug treat- hypertensive patients, treated blood pressure level ment of non-malignant hypertension reduces the did not protect against subsequent rise in serum cre- incidence of renal dysfunction. atinine.10,11 The strongest study design to address whether Methods Correspondence: Dr Chi-yuan Hsu, Division of Nephrology, Identification of trials University of California, San Francisco, Room 672 HSE, 513 Parnassus Avenue, San Francisco, CA 94143-0532, USA. E-mail: Randomised controlled trials of antihypertensive hsuchiȰmedicine.ucsf.edu drugs among patients with non-malignant hyperten- Received 28 June 2000; accepted 10 July 2000 sion were identified using prior meta-analyses, bib- Treatment of non-malignant HTN CY Hsu 100 liographies in recent articles and textbooks and MED- example, the paper describing the main findings of LINE searches. Locating relevant studies was the United States Public Health Service Hospitals facilitated by the fact that numerous meta-analyses of (USPHS) study listed ‘renal insufficiency’ as an this literature have been performed that used similar exclusion criterion and as a secondary outcome.20 trial selection criteria.12–16 However, these published An earlier paper defined ‘renal insufficiency’ as systematic analyses have mostly focused on cardio- measured creatinine clearance Ͻ80 ml/min/ vascular disease outcomes. Extra effort was expended 1.73m2.24 on locating recent publications and a rigorous MED- In all trials, whenever possible, intention-to-treat LINE search strategy designed by the Cochrane Col- analysis outcome data were used as input data for laboration to identify trials of pharmacological treat- the meta-analysis. In the European Working Party on ment of hypertension16 was conducted for the period High Blood Pressure in the Elderly Trial (EWPHE), 1995 through 1998. A total of 2617 records were pro- serial serum creatinine measurements were perfor- duced.Thetitleandabstractofeachrecordwere med only during the randomised part of the study, evaluated and full text of 31 articles obtained for but mortality and cause of death data continued to further evaluation. No additional trials met eligibility be collected on all patients after withdrawal from criteria for this review. randomisation.28 During randomisation, one treated patient died of renal disease and four treated and one control patients had doubling of serum creatin- Inclusion criteria ine. In the overall intention-to-treat analysis, four Trials of randomised antihypertensive drug therapy treated and one control patient died of renal dis- included in the meta-analysis are those published ease.28,29 Because ascertainment of serum creatinine before 1 January, 1999 that: (1) lasted over 1 year; doubling may be more reliable than nosologist’s (2) explicitly described random allocation of treat- coding of cause of death, the ‘on treatment’ data ment (ie, did not use alternate allocation or other were used. In the Systolic Hypertension in the Eld- potentially biased methods); and (3) reported renal erly Program (SHEP), a rise in serum creatinine to dysfunction as an outcome. Trials that compared the Ͼ265 ␮mol/l (3 mg/dl) was explicitly listed as a sec- effects of two specific antihypertensive therapies ondary endpoint.30 In addition, it was reported that with the same blood pressure goal were excluded. two patients each in the treatment and control arm Trials of multiple risk factor interventions were died of renal disease, which was not a stated end- excluded because of potential confounding by other point. These were therefore not counted. Performing therapies. Also excluded were trials that enrolled the meta-analysis using these alternative endpoints only patients with known renal insufficiency or did not significantly change the final conclusions of established renal parenchymal disease17–19 since the study. this study was not designed to examine the effect of In two instances, after publication of the paper blood pressuring lowering in patients who already describing the main trial findings, secondary analy- had renal dysfunction. ses of trial data were performed which provided more information on renal function changes.21,31 The meta-analysis was repeated to incorporate the Extraction of data results of these secondary analyses. The author used a standardised abstraction sheet to extract the following data from each study: year of Statistical analysis publication, number of subjects, mean age, percent male, baseline systolic and diastolic blood The effect of antihypertensive medication on the pressures, types of medication used, blinding, use of development of renal dysfunction was determined placebo or a less intensely treated group as control, in each trial using the relative risk (RR), calculated duration of follow-up, and mean difference in by the ratio of the incidence of renal dysfunction in observed blood pressure between treatment and con- the treatment vs control group. In cases where there trol groups. The proportion of black (or non-white20) were no events, a 1/6 arithmetic correction was participants was also abstracted. This was hypo- added to all cells.32 A random-effects model as thesised a priori to be a possible source of hetero- described by DerSimonian and Laird was used to geneity among studies, as black subjects are believed obtain the summary estimates of log (RR) from the to be particularly susceptible to renal damage from included studies.33 Effect homogeneity was evalu- hypertension.21,22 ated by the Q-statistic.33 Stata Release 6 (College Information on whether and how patients with Station, TX, USA) was used to perform the analysis renal disease were excluded from entry into each and to produce graphic output (command ‘meta’). trial was abstracted. Also noted was how new cases of renal dysfunction were defined in the paper Results presenting the main findings of each trial. In some instances, renal exclusion criteria and definition of Ten trials were identified that met the inclusion cri- renal dysfunction were found in earlier publications teria20,27,28,30,34–39 (Table 1). These encompassed a detailing the study protocol or pilot study.23–26 For total of 26 521 individuals and 114 000 person-years Journal of Human Hypertension Treatment of non-malignant HTN CY Hsu 101 Table 1 Characteristics
Recommended publications
  • High B1a0d Pressure and Its Treatment in General
    HIGH B1A0D PRESSURE AND ITS TREATMENT IN GENERAL PRACTICE WITH PARTICULAR REFERENCE TO A SERIES OF 100 CASES TREATED BY THE AUTHOR By HAROLD WILSON B01YBR IB.ffh.B. ProQuest Number: 13849841 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a com plete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. uest ProQuest 13849841 Published by ProQuest LLC(2019). Copyright of the Dissertation is held by the Author. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States C ode Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106- 1346 -CONTENTS SECTION 1. Introduction. SECTION 2. General Remarks. Definitions of General Interest. Present Views on Etiology. Pathology and Morbid Anatomy. Brief Historical Survey. SECTION 3. The Present Position. Prevalence. Clinical Manifestations. Prognosis. SECTION 4. Prevalence in Bolton. Summary of Cases. Symptomatology and Case Histories Prognosis. Treatment. SECTION 5. Conclusions. Bibliography. SECTION 1. INTRODUCTION. I think it can truthfully be said that the most interest­ ing problems in Medioine are those that are most baffling. Some years ago Ralph M a j o r ^ wrote these words, ”If our knowledge of the etiology of arterial hypertension is shrouded in a oertain haze, our knowledge of an effective therapy in this disease is enveloped in a dense fog.n A study of some of the vast literature on this subject does not greatly clarify the obscurity.
    [Show full text]
  • DISEASES of ARTERIES ARTERIOSCLEROSIS (“Hardening of the Arteries”): General Term Reflecting Arterial Wall Thickening and Loss of Elasticity
    DISEASES OF ARTERIES ARTERIOSCLEROSIS (“hardening of the arteries”): general term reflecting arterial wall thickening and loss of elasticity 3 patterns •Atherosclerosis: involves the the aorta and the large arteries •Mönckeberg sclerosis: calcific deposits in the media of middle-sized arteries in persons >age 50 •Arteriolosclerosis: involves the small arteries and arterioles in association with hypertension or diabetes ATHEROSCLEROSIS Multifactorial, slowly progressive chronic degenerative-inflammatory disease of the aorta and the large arteries, such as • coronary arteries • circle of Willis • popliteal and tibial arteries Significance: > 50% of all death is attributed to atherosclerosis in well-developed countries Morphology Gross • Atheromatous plaque (pathognomic) - raised white-yellow lesion in the intima, protruding into the lumen • Large plaques in the aorta (> 2 cm) contain a yellow, grumous debris (”atheroma” - Greek word for gruel) Atheromatous plaque in the middle cerebral artery: raised white-yellow lesion in the intima, protruding into the lumen (formol-fixed brain) Aorta: the plaques contain a yellow, grumous debris (arrow) Structure of atheroma on LM • Intimal lesion • Central lipid core • Fibrous ”cap” subendothelially Central lipid core composed of lipids, cholesterol clefts, necrotic debris + calcium-salts, surrounded by foamy macrophages, T-lymphocytes, fibroblasts, small capillaries, and collagens and proteoglycans Types of plaques • Vulnerable plaques have large atheromatous cores, increased inflammatory cell content and thin fibrous caps high risk of rupture thrombosis • Stable plaques have minimal atheromatous cores and inflammation and thick fibrous caps 70% stenosis (critical stenosis) chronic ischemia distally Vulnerable plaque in the coronary artery Inflammatory infiltrates and capillaries around the lipid core. Lumen Intima Media Pathogenesis Response to chronic endocardial injury hypothesis • Cholesterol can’t dissolve in the blood.
    [Show full text]
  • DSM III and ICD 9 Codes 11-2004
    Diagnoses and ICD-9 Codes: Alphabetical 918.1 Abrasion -Corneal 682 Abscess 372 Abscess Conjunctiva 566 Abscess Corneal 566 Abscess Rectal 682.9 Abscess, Unspecified Site (Cellulitis) 995.81 Abuse, Adult 436 Accident Cerebrovascular, Acute (Less than 8 weeks after Occurrence) 438 Accident, Cerebrovascular, Chronic (Healed or Old) 276.2 Acidosis (Keto-Acidosis) 706.1 Acne 255.4 Addisonian Crisis (Adrenal Cortical Deficiency Hypoadrenalism) 289.3 Adenitis 525.1 Adentia (Loss of Teeth d\Due to Accident, Extraction or Periodontal Diease) 309.89 Adjustment Reaction to Late Life 309.9 Adjustment Reaction-Unspcified 742.2 Agenesis-Cerebral 307.9 Agitation 307.9 Agitation 368.16 Agnosia-Visual 291.9 Alcholick Psychosis 303.9 Alcholism (Addiction, Chronic Dependence) 291.8 Alcohol Withdrawal 291.8 Alcohol Withdrawal 291.2 Alcoholic Dementia 303 Alcoholism 303 Alcoholism 276.3 Alkalosis 995.3 Allergies, Cause Unspecifed (Reaction) 335.2 ALS (A;myothophic Lateral Sclerosis) 331 Alzheimers 331 Alzheimers Disease 362.34 Amaurosis Fugax 305.7 Amphetamine Abuse (Meth Abuse) 897 Amputation (Legs) 736.89 Amputation, Leg, Status Post (Above Knee, Below Knee) 736.9 Amputee, Site Unspecified (Acquired Deformity) 285.9 Anemia 284.9 Anemia Aplastic (Hypoplastic Bone Morrow) 280 Anemia Due to loss of Blood 281 Anemia Pernicious 280.9 Anemia, Iron Deficiency, Unspecified 285.9 Anemia, Unspecified (Normocytic, Not due to blood loss) 281.9 Anemia, Unspecified Deficiency (Macrocytic, Nutritional 441.5 Aneurysm Aortic, Ruptured 441.1 Aneurysm, Abdominal 441.3 Aneurysm,
    [Show full text]
  • HYPERTENSION-I by ROBERT PLATE, M.D., M.Sc., F.R.C.P
    BRITISH APRIL 22, 1950 HYPERTENSION MEDICAL JOURNAL 951 REFRESHER COURSE FOR GENERAL PRACTITIONERS HYPERTENSION-I BY ROBERT PLATE, M.D., M.Sc., F.R.C.P. Professor of Medicine, University of Manchester Hypertension is a syndrome and not a disease. A large tension in that they developed arteriolar necrosis in various number of cases with high blood pressure fall into the organs, though not, however, in the kidneys, because by the group which is known as primary or essential hypertension. very nature of the experiment the renal arterioles were This means that no pre-existing disease which might have protected from the effects of the high blood pressure. If caused the hypertension can be discovered. In other words, the renal artery of only one kidney was constricted, as Wakerlin (1949) has said, "'Essential hypertension' is hypertension was usually more transient and less severe, a designation born of ignorance and is equivalent to 'fever and if the affected kidney was removed the blood pressure of unknown cause."' Although we are ignorant of the returned to normal. cause of esgential hypertension I believe that it is much Wilson and Byrom (1939) found that severe hypertensiorn more than a merely negative diagnosis, and that it will of the malignant type could be produced in rats by con- turn out to be a definite entity with a recognizable patho- striction of only one renal artery, in which case the patho- genesis. A family history of hypertensive disease is present logical changes of malignant hypertension, with their in a high proportion of cases of essential hypertension.
    [Show full text]
  • Dissecting Aneurysm of the Aorta
    Cleveland Clinic Quarterly Volume 23 OCTOBER 1956 No. 4 DISSECTING ANEURYSM OF THE AORTA A Review ARTHUR L. SCHERBEL, M.D., Division of Medicine JOHN B. HAZARD, M.D., Department of Pathology and VICTOR G. DEWOLFE, M.D. Department of Cardiovascular Disease ISSECTING ANEURYSM OF THE AORTA is an intramural separation D of the aortic wall by circulating blood that has penetrated and extended into the media. The process may arrest at this stage and heal, progress im- mediately, or extend at some later date. As the dissecting aneurysm progresses, it may rupture through the adventitia into the pericardial, pleural, or abdominal cavities and may obstruct arteries arising from the aorta. It may rupture back into the lumen and form a double-barreled aorta, which may persist, or the aneurysm may be filled with clot and subsequently heal, obliterating the secondary channel. Etiology Although the specific cause of the disease is not known, the lesion that generally is accepted as being precedent to dissecting aneurysm of the aorta is 231 Downloaded from www.ccjm.org on September 26, 2021. For personal use only. All other uses require permission. SCHERBEL, HAZARD, AND DEWOLFE A Fig. 1. Changes in the media. (A) Medial degeneration (mucinous); hematoxylin, eosin and methylene blue stain, X80. (B) Marked loss of elastic tissue in a corresponding area; Verhoeff's stain, X80. 232 Cleveland Clinic Quarterly Downloaded from www.ccjm.org on September 26, 2021. For personal use only. All other uses require permission. DISSECTING ANEURYSM OF THE AORTA medial degeneration. This most often consists of mucoid changes in the media and focal loss of elastic tissue (Fig.
    [Show full text]
  • Hypertension and the Kidney
    8.10 Hypertension and the Kidney SPECTRUM OF CLINICAL RENAL INVOLVEMENT IN MALIGNANT HYPERTENSION Progressive subacute deterioration of renal function to end-stage renal disease Transient deterioration of renal function with initial blood pressure control Oliguric acute renal failure Established renal failure FIGURE 8-17 Malignant hypertension is a progressive systemic vasculopathy in which renal involvement is a relatively late finding. In this regard, patients with malignant hypertension can present with a spectrum of renal involvement ranging from normal renal function with minimal FIGURE 8-16 (see Color Plate) albuminuria to end-stage renal disease (ESRD) indistinguishable Micrograph of proliferative endarteritis in malignant hypertension from that seen in primary renal parenchymal disease. In patients (musculomucoid intimal hyperplasia). In malignant nephrosclerosis, initially exhibiting preserved renal function, in the absence of adequate the interlobular (cortical radial) arteries reveal characteristic lesions. blood pressure control, it is common to observe subacute deterio- These lesions are variously referred to as proliferative endarteritis, ration of renal function to ESRD over a period of weeks to months. endarteritis fibrosa, musculomucoid intimal hyperplasia, or the Transient deterioration of renal function with initial control of onionskin lesion. The typical finding is marked thickening of the blood pressure is a well-documented entity in patients initially intima that obstructs the vessel lumen. In severely affected vessels exhibiting mild to moderate renal impairment. Occasionally, the luminal diameter may be reduced to the caliber of a single ery- patients with malignant hypertension initially exhibit oliguric acute throcyte. Occasionally, complete obliteration of the lumen by a renal failure, necessitating initiation of dialysis within a few days of superimposed fibrin thrombus occurs.
    [Show full text]
  • Incidence, Morbidity and Mortality of Patients with Achalasia in England: Findings from a Nationwide Hospital Database and 4 Million Population Based Data
    Incidence, morbidity and mortality of patients with achalasia in England: findings from a nationwide hospital database and 4 million population based data Appendix A: International Classification of Disease codes for Achalasia (HES) K22 – Achalasia of cardia Appendix B: Read codes (The Health Improvement Network) Appendix B1: Achalasia codes Clinical code Description J100.00 Achalasia of cardia Appendix B2: Clinical codes used to identify Hypertension, Diabetes and lipid lowering drugs Diabetes Clinical code Description C10..00 Diabetes mellitus C100.00 Diabetes mellitus with no mention of complication C100000 Diabetes mellitus, juvenile type, no mention of complication C100011 Insulin dependent diabetes mellitus C100100 Diabetes mellitus, adult onset, no mention of complication C100111 Maturity onset diabetes C100112 Non-insulin dependent diabetes mellitus C100z00 Diabetes mellitus NOS with no mention of complication C101.00 Diabetes mellitus with ketoacidosis C101000 Diabetes mellitus, juvenile type, with ketoacidosis C101100 Diabetes mellitus, adult onset, with ketoacidosis C101y00 Other specified diabetes mellitus with ketoacidosis C101z00 Diabetes mellitus NOS with ketoacidosis C102.00 Diabetes mellitus with hyperosmolar coma C102000 Diabetes mellitus, juvenile type, with hyperosmolar coma C102100 Diabetes mellitus, adult onset, with hyperosmolar coma C102z00 Diabetes mellitus NOS with hyperosmolar coma C103.00 Diabetes mellitus with ketoacidotic coma C103000 Diabetes mellitus, juvenile type, with ketoacidotic coma C103100 Diabetes
    [Show full text]
  • Essential Hypertension*
    BRmSw 30 October 1965 MEDICAL JOURNAL 1021 Br Med J: first published as 10.1136/bmj.2.5469.1021 on 30 October 1965. Downloaded from Hyperpiesis: High Blood-pressure without Evident Cause: Essential Hypertension* Sir GEORGE PICKERINGt M.D., D.SC., F.R.C.P., F.R.S. Brit. med.J_., 1965, 2, 1021-1026 Benign Hypertension that there is a third factor not in the coronary arteries and not the arterial pressure which contributes to hypertensive heart The benign phase of hypertension offers a great contrast to the disease. Could it possibly be related to advancing years, the malignant phase. The course is long and variable, with the disorder described by William Dock (1945) as presbycardia ? condition often remaining unchanged for years; thus, of As Fig. 12 shows, heart weight and arterial pressure are related Bechgaard's original 1,038 patients, 357 were alive after 20 quantitatively. Since, as Shirley Smith and Fowler (1955) and years (llechgaard et al., 1956). Bechgaard (unpublished) has Hamilton (1956) have shown, heart failure can be relieved and recently reported that 144 were alive after 26 to 32 years. prevented by lowering pressure, and since heart size decreases Uraemia does not occur; bilateral neuroretinopathy does not (Smirk, 1957), there is a strong case for supposing that elevation occur; cerebral oedema does not occur, or occurs only rarely; of arterial pressure is a causal factor in the cardiac changes. patients tend to die of heart failure, cerebral vascular disease, or intercurrent disease. Its nature is clearly different. The malignant phase is characterized by lesions which Cerebral Vascular Disease represent the limit of cardiovascular tolerance, fibrinoid arteriolar necrosis, retinal exudates representing focal vascular Cerebral vascular disease is still something of a morass.
    [Show full text]
  • 5. Upper Gastrointestinal Tract
    5. UPPER GASTROINTESTINAL TRACT JOHANNA C. BENDELL, MD CHRISTOPHER WILLETT, MD Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC The upper gastrointestinal tract lies within the radiation field for most thoracic and abdominal cancers. Toxicity to the upper gastrointestinal tract often limits the radiation doses that can be given. Radiation therapy causes both acute and late effects. The acute effects of radiation include mucosal denudation, while late effects consist of fibrotic changes leading to decreased mobility and ischemia. Multifield and conformal radiation therapy, as well as patient positioning techniques, reduce the volume of normal tissue exposed to radiation and can decrease the potential toxicity. However, the treatment of radiation toxicity is mainly supportive. The increasing use of concurrent chemotherapy and radiation therapy has required enhanced awareness of potential effects and better methods to decrease toxicity, as this combination of treatments is associated with a higher rate of gastrointestinal toxicity. The first part of this chapter will review the pathologic changes of acute and chronic radiation effects, and the second part will discuss clinical effects, including radiation dosing and management of toxicities. A. BIOLOGY OF RADIATION EFFECTS A1. Esophagus Pathologic studies of animal models have been used to describe and characterize the effects of radiation to the esophagus. Pathologic changes include an acute thinning of the squamous epithelial layer with vacuolization and absence of mitoses, followed by areas of complete denudation and areas of increased basal cell proliferation. Chronic changes include focal coagulation necrosis of the muscularis mucosa and deep muscle as 112 Radiation Toxicity: A Practical Guide well as inflammatory changes around the ganglion cells of the mesenteric plexus in the deep wall.1,2 Physiologically, failure of the peristaltic wave and decreased relaxation of the lower esophageal sphincter are seen.
    [Show full text]
  • Hypertensive Emergencies
    Introduction INTRODUCTION Hypertension is defined as sustained increase of systolic and diastolic blood pressure above the normal range for age ,sex and weight regardless of the primary causes accepted upper limits for ABP. Infants 70/45,early child hood 85/55, adolescents 100/75, adult 140/90 (Wongprasartsuk, 2003). Classification Several factors are taken into account in classifying an hypertensive condition: the evolution of the disease, the magnitude of the increase in blood pressure values, the etiology of the hypertensive state, and the absolute level of the total cardiovascular risk profile. The total risk profile appears to be the most comprehensive because, as suggested by the European Guidelines (Seedat. et al., 2002). A. Classification of Hypertension According to Disease Evolution The evolution of the hypertensive state allows classification of blood pressure elevation as two forms: malignant hypertension and benign hypertension. 1. Malignant Hypertension Malignant hypertension, which was first described as a separate disease entity about 90 years ago by Volhard and Fahr, is characterized by a very high blood pressure elevation (usually .200/120 mmHg) that is most often associated with an increase in plasma creatinine levels, renal dysfunction and failure, left ventricular hypertrophy, microangiopathic hemolytic anemia, and neurological manifestations of hypertensive encephalopathy (Seedat. et al., 2002). -1- Introduction The incidence of new cases of accelerated hypertension has decreased drastically in the past few years, primarily because earlier diagnosis and treatment of the disease prevents blood pressure increases in the vast majority of cases, as well as preventing the clinical manifestations and complications of such an elevation in pressure. The prognosis of malignant hypertension also has improved in the past few years because of the availability of new and effective antihypertensive compounds and the availability of renal dialysis and kidney transplantation (Seedat.
    [Show full text]
  • Hypertensive Kidney Disease” Fit?
    Arch Clin Med Case Rep 2020; 4 (2): 164-179 DOI: 10.26502/acmcr.96550182 Case Report In The Era of Precision Medicine- Where Does the Diagnosis “Hypertensive Kidney Disease” Fit? Sadichhya Lohani MBBS1*, Mohamed G Atta MD, MPH2 1Renal-Electrolyte and Hypertension Division, University of Pennsylvania, Pennsylvania, United States 2Division of Nephrology, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Maryland, United States *Corresponding Author: Dr. Sadichhya Lohani, Renal-Electrolyte and Hypertension Division, University of Pennsylvania, Pennsylvania, United States, E-mail: [email protected] Received: 20 January 2020; Accepted: 31 January 2020; Published: 02 March 2020 Abstract Hypertension has been labeled as a cause of non-diabetic chronic kidney disease for decades. In today’s era of precision medicine, labeling benign hypertension as the initial etiology for chronic kidney disease might not be accurate. We discuss an example of a 55-year-old African American patient with pathologic findings of nephrosclerosis without history of hypertension. The pathologic findings of nephrosclerosis can be result of obesity, aging, genetic susceptibility and variety of other previously undiagnosed primary renal disease, and hence shouldn’t be automatically mark hypertensive nephrosclerosis. Multiple studies to date have failed to prove or refute causality between benign hypertension and non-diabetic chronic kidney disease. Genome sequencing of non-diabetic kidney diseases have identified mutations in Apolipoprotein L1 gene, MYH9 gene, and uromodulin gene as risk factors for chronic kidney disease. There is no dispute that uncontrolled hypertension leads to progression of kidney disease and that blood pressure should be controlled adequately. The relationship between hypertension and kidney dysfunction should be viewed as an association and broad differential diagnoses should be pursued.
    [Show full text]
  • Thrombosis (Lec#1)
    Thrombosis (lec#1) * Pathogenesis (called Virchow's triad): Endothelial Injury ( Heart, Arteries), Stasis (abnormal blood flow),Blood Hypercoagulability . * Endothelial cells can be stimulated by direct injury or by various cytokines that are produced during inflammation. * Pathologic effect of vascular healing Excessive thickening of the intima luminal stenosis & blockage of vascular flow *Stasis: a major factor in venous thrombi. * Hypercoagulability A. Genetic (primary): - Mutations in the factor V gene and the prothrombin gene are the most common B. Acquired (secondary): - Multifactorial and is therefore more complicated * Morphology of thrombi : - Can develop anywhere in the CVS , focally attached to the underlying vascular surface. - Arterial or cardiac thrombi begin at sites of endothelial injury or turbulence; and are usually superimposed on an atherosclerotic plaque. - Venous thrombi occur at sites of stasis. Most commonly the veins of the lower extremities (90%). * lines of Zahn -Thrombi can have grossly (and microscopically) apparent laminations called lines of Zahn; these represent pale platelet and fibrin layers alternating with darker erythrocyte-rich layers. - Such lines are significant in that they represent thrombosis of flowing blood . - Postmortem blood clots are bland non-laminated clots (no lines of Zahn) . * Mural thrombi: thrombi occurring in heart chambers or in the aortic lumen. * Vegetations : Thrombi on heart valves - Types: 1- infectious (Bacterial or fungal blood-borne infections)(e.g. infective endocarditis,). 2-Non-bacterial thrombotic endocarditis occur on sterile valves. * Venous thrombi: (veins of the legs) are most common a. Superficial: e.g. Saphenous veins , can cause local congestion, swelling, pain, and tenderness along the course of the involved vein, but they rarely embolize .
    [Show full text]