The Effects of Feedrate and Material Hardness on Burr Formation in Grinding Processes

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Effects of Feedrate and Material Hardness on Burr Formation in Grinding Processes The Effects of Feedrate and Material Hardness on Burr Formation in Grinding Processes By Michelle Ladouceur Erin McLean and Liza Tuttle A Major Qualifying Project Submitted to the Faculty of the WORCESTER POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Bachelors of Science In Mechanical Engineering April 2008 APPROVED: Prof. Christopher A. Brown, Project Advisor 1 | P a g e Table of Contents List of Tables: ................................................................................................................................. 3 List of Figures: ................................................................................................................................ 4 Abstract ........................................................................................................................................... 5 1.0 Introduction ............................................................................................................................... 6 1.1 Objectives .................................................................................................................................. 6 1.2 Rationale ................................................................................................................................... 6 1.3 State-of-the-art .......................................................................................................................... 7 1.4 Approach ................................................................................................................................. 10 2.0 Methods................................................................................................................................... 11 2.1 Create Burrs............................................................................................................................ 11 2.1.1 Preparing the Workpieces.................................................................................................... 12 2.1.2 Grinding Process ................................................................................................................. 14 2.2 Record Burrs ........................................................................................................................... 15 2.3 Measure and Analyze Burrs .................................................................................................... 16 3.0 Results ..................................................................................................................................... 18 4.0 Discussion ............................................................................................................................... 24 5.0 Conclusions ............................................................................................................................. 25 6.0 Design of a Coolant Supply System ....................................................................................... 26 References ..................................................................................................................................... 41 Appendix A: .................................................................................................................................. 43 Problems that occurred during project......................................................................................... 43 Appendix B: .................................................................................................................................. 46 Research Obsticles ........................................................................................................................ 46 Appendix C: .................................................................................................................................. 47 Operator Issues for Hardness Testing .......................................................................................... 47 Appendix D: .................................................................................................................................. 48 Properties of 440 C steel............................................................................................................... 48 Appendix E: .................................................................................................................................. 49 Macro Pictures.............................................................................................................................. 49 Appendix F: .................................................................................................................................. 55 Macro Graphs of Burrs with and without scales .......................................................................... 55 2 | P a g e List of Tables: Table 1: Hardness tests 1-4, average hardness values, and time spent in heat treatment for each workpiece ...................................................................................................................................... 13 Table 2: Workpiece Feedrate and Hardness and Measured Burr Dimensions ............................. 17 Table 3: Mean Length, Height, and Thickness for each Hardness Range .................................... 20 Table 4: Mean Length, Height, and Thickness for each Feedrate ................................................ 22 3 | P a g e List of Figures: Figure 1 : Measure HRC values for each workpiece .................................................................... 13 Figure 2 : Duration of Workpieces in Heat Treating oven compared to average HRC values…..14 Figure 3 : Burr Measurements ...................................................................................................... 16 Figure 4 : Length, Height, and Thickness of each burr vs the workpieces‟ HRC ........................ 17 Figure 5 : Workpiece Hardness vs. Burr Length ......................................................................... 18 Figure 6 : Workpiece Hardness vs. Burr Thickness .................................................................... 19 Figure 7 : Burr Length vs. Workpiece Hardness ......................................................................... 19 Figure 8 : Mean Burr Length, Height, and Thickness vs. Hardness ranges ................................ 20 Figure 9 : Burr Length compared to the Feedrate used to create it ............................................... 21 Figure 10 : Burr Height compared to the Feedrate used to create it ............................................. 21 Figure 11 : Burr Thickness compared to the Feedrate used to create it ........................................ 22 Figure 12 : Mean Burr Length, Height, and Thickness compared to Feedrate ............................. 23 Figure 13: The Temperature of the material vs. the distance from the heat source (Snoeys et al. 1973) ............................................................................................................................................. 27 Figure 14 : Fluid flow through the Hahn grinder .......................................................................... 29 Figure 15 : Function requirements ................................................................................................ 30 Figure 16 : Design Parameters ...................................................................................................... 30 Figure 17 : Dimensions and velocity diagram of a centrifugal pump (Munson, 2006) ................ 34 Figure 18 : Vector composition of V2 .......................................................................................... 34 Figure 19 : Selected pump dimensions and speed ........................................................................ 35 Figure 20 : Front view of proposed collection/holding tank......................................................... 36 Figure 21 : Top and side views of collection/holding tank ........................................................... 37 Figure 22 : Fluid transportation path (side view).......................................................................... 37 Figure 23 : Position of exit points for fluid (top view) ................................................................. 38 Figure 24 : Positions of exit pipes................................................................................................. 38 Figure 25 : Nozzle dimensions ..................................................................................................... 40 4 | P a g e Abstract This work investigates the effects of material hardness and feedrate on burr dimensions created in grinding processes. Once burr have been formed, macrographs are taken and burr length, height, and thickness is recorded. Correlations between material hardness and feedrate were not consistent from one burr dimension to the next. The unhardened workpieces produced the smallest burrs and the next smallest were found on workpieces in the 57-59 Rockwell C hardness scale. There is evidence of the material having an ideal hardness value for producing minimum and maximum burr size. 5 | P a g e 1.0 Introduction 1.1 Objectives The main objective of this project is to determine the effects of two independent variables, hardness and feedrate, on burr creation on parts of 440C stainless steel. In order to complete this objective we needed to devise methods for repeatedly creating the burrs on specialized grinding apparatus, develop a procedure for modifying
Recommended publications
  • Noga Head Office
    Noga Head Office NOGA ENGINEERING & TECHNOLOGY (2008) LTD Noga Engineering and Technology was established in 1980. Over the years the company has grown to become the world leader in the manufacturing of three main lines: simply sophisticated Deburring Systems Holding Systems Cutting Fluid Applicators Noga’s strongest points are product design and development, quality and service. Our products are sold in more than 60 countries either through our own companies or a network of exclusive agents. All NOGA products meet the strict requirements of ISO 9001 and ISO 14001. We invite you to visit our web site: www.noga.com for further information. NOGA reserves the right to make changes in any of its products without prior notice. © Copyright NOGA Engineering & Technology (2008) Ltd. WARNINGS Blades are sharp and can cut. Blades can break causing flying shards. Sharp edges and flying shards can cause injury. Wear safety googles (both user and bystanders). Do not pry or bend blades. Keep away from children. Do not regrind blades. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, transcribed, stored in an electronic retrieval system, translated into any language or computer language, or be transmitted in any form whatsoever without the prior written consent of the publisher. simply sophisticated Deburring Systems HEAVY DUTY 3-8 CERAMIC 39-44 LIGHT DUTY 9-14 SETS & KITS 45-50 COUNTERSINKS 15-26 SPECIALTY TOOLS 51-54 SCRAPERS 27-30 SPECIALTY BLADES 55-56 DIAMOND FILES 31-32 CHIP HOOKS 57-59 DOUBLE-EDGE 33-36 PLUMBING 60-65 SINGLE EDGE 37-38 INDEX 66 simply sophisticated Deburring Tools simply sophisticated 1 Contents H.D.
    [Show full text]
  • Burrs—Analysis, Control and Removal CIRP Annals
    CIRP Annals - Manufacturing Technology 58 (2009) 519–542 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect CIRP Annals - Manufacturing Technology journal homepage: http://ees.elsevier.com/cirp/default.asp Burrs—Analysis, control and removal J.C. Aurich (1)a,*, D. Dornfeld (1)b, P.J. Arrazola (3)c, V. Franke a, L. Leitz a, S. Min (2)b a Institute for Manufacturing Technology and Production Systems, University of Kaiserslautern, Germany b Laboratory for Manufacturing and Sustainability, University of California, Berkeley, USA c Manufacturing Department, Faculty of Engineering, Mondragon University, Mondrago´n, Spain ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Keywords: Increasing demands on function and performance call for burr-free workpiece edges after machining. Machining Since deburring is a costly and non-value-added operation, the understanding and control of burr Burr formation is a research topic with high relevance to industrial applications. Following a review of burr Burr control classifications along with the corresponding measurement technologies, burr formation mechanisms in machining are described. Deburring and burr control are two possible ways to deal with burrs. For both, an insight into current research results are presented. Finally, a number of case studies on burr formation, control and deburring along with their economic implications are presented. ß 2009 CIRP. 1. Motivation and introduction to issues regarding burrs asked to name the manufacturing share related to burrs for a specific workpiece. The expenses are caused by an increase of The demands placed by designers on workpiece performance about 15% in man power and cycle times. In addition, a 2% share in and functionality are increasing rapidly. Important aspects of the reject rate and a 4% share in machine breakdown times due to manufacturing’s contribution to the fulfillment of these demands burrs were reported (see Fig.
    [Show full text]
  • Boilermaking Manual. INSTITUTION British Columbia Dept
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 246 301 CE 039 364 TITLE Boilermaking Manual. INSTITUTION British Columbia Dept. of Education, Victoria. REPORT NO ISBN-0-7718-8254-8. PUB DATE [82] NOTE 381p.; Developed in cooperation with the 1pprenticeship Training Programs Branch, Ministry of Labour. Photographs may not reproduce well. AVAILABLE FROMPublication Services Branch, Ministry of Education, 878 Viewfield Road, Victoria, BC V9A 4V1 ($10.00). PUB TYPE Guides Classroom Use - Materials (For Learner) (OW EARS PRICE MFOI Plus Postage. PC Not Available from EARS. DESCRIPTORS Apprenticeships; Blue Collar Occupations; Blueprints; *Construction (Process); Construction Materials; Drafting; Foreign Countries; Hand Tools; Industrial Personnel; *Industrial Training; Inplant Programs; Machine Tools; Mathematical Applications; *Mechanical Skills; Metal Industry; Metals; Metal Working; *On the Job Training; Postsecondary Education; Power Technology; Quality Control; Safety; *Sheet Metal Work; Skilled Occupations; Skilled Workers; Trade and Industrial Education; Trainees; Welding IDENTIFIERS *Boilermakers; *Boilers; British Columbia ABSTRACT This manual is intended (I) to provide an information resource to supplement the formal training program for boilermaker apprentices; (2) to assist the journeyworker to build on present knowledge to increase expertise and qualify for formal accreditation in the boilermaking trade; and (3) to serve as an on-the-job reference with sound, up-to-date guidelines for all aspects of the trade. The manual is organized into 13 chapters that cover the following topics: safety; boilermaker tools; mathematics; material, blueprint reading and sketching; layout; boilershop fabrication; rigging and erection; welding; quality control and inspection; boilers; dust collection systems; tanks and stacks; and hydro-electric power development. Each chapter contains an introduction and information about the topic, illustrated with charts, line drawings, and photographs.
    [Show full text]
  • Tube and Pipe Cutting Techniques; Advantages and Limitations Abrasive to Shear, Each Method Has Its Place
    TPJ ‐ The Tube & Pipe Journal® Tube and pipe cutting techniques; advantages and limitations Abrasive to shear, each method has its place By Leonard Eaton, Contributing Writer January 24, 2002 Many factors are involved in choosing a particular method or technology for cutting tube or pipe. Many factors are involved in choosing a particular method or technology for cutting tube or pipe. The basic factors that affect the cut are the tube or pipe material, wall thickness, squareness of ends, end‐conditioning requirements, and secondary process requirements. Other factors that play a role include production volume, cutting efficiency, overhead costs, and special requirements of the tube or pipe material. Abrasive Cutting Abrasive sawing is a basic, manual method of cutting‐to‐length product to the customer's specification in any alloy. An abrasive saw operates with a circular abrasive blade or resin‐ composition wheel—either wet or dry—that grinds through the product. Cut size capabilities depend on the machine. Some abrasive cutting machines can handle a solid round up to 4 in. outside diameter (OD). This general‐purpose method is useful for hand‐loading applications and small product runs that do not require critical end conditions. While an abrasive saw is easy to use and requires little or no setup time, it cannot provide a square cut or tight tolerances. Because the process uses a cutting or burning action, it is not efficient for thick‐walled material. It also might leave a heat‐affected zone (HAZ) that can affect secondary processing. While abrasive sawing is inexpensive and quick, it produces significant kerf and a heavy burr that might have to be removed by deburring.
    [Show full text]
  • Development of a Micro-Drilling Burr-Control Chart for PCB Drilling
    UC Berkeley Green Manufacturing and Sustainable Manufacturing Partnership Title Development of a micro-drilling burr-control chart for PCB drilling Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/08k854nq Journal Precision Engineering, 38(1) Authors Bhandari, Binayak Hong, Young-Sun Yoon, Hae-Sung et al. Publication Date 2014 eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California Precision Engineering 38 (2014) 221–229 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Precision Engineering jou rnal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/precision Technical note Development of a micro-drilling burr-control chart for PCB drilling a a a a Binayak Bhandari , Young-Sun Hong , Hae-Sung Yoon , Jong-Seol Moon , a b c c c Minh-Quan Pham , Gyu-Bong Lee , Yuchu Huang , Barbara S. Linke , D.A. Dornfeld , a,∗ Sung-Hoon Ahn a School of Mechanical & Aerospace Engineering, Seoul National University, Seoul 151-742, Republic of Korea b Korea Institute of Industrial Technology (KITECH), Cheonan-si 330-825, Republic of Korea c Laboratory for Manufacturing and Sustainability, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720-1740, United States a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t Article history: A drilling burr-control chart (DBCC), based on experimental results, is a tool for the prediction and control Received 17 April 2012 of drilling burrs for a large range of drilling parameters. A micro-drilling burr-control chart (M-DBCC) was Received in revised form 11 July 2013 developed for a standard double-sided copper-clad laminated (CCL) printed circuit board (PCB) with lam- Accepted 29 July 2013 inated fiber-reinforced plastic (FRP) substrate.
    [Show full text]
  • Carbide Rotary Burrs
    CARBIDE ROTARY BURRS 1 CARBIDE ROTARY BURRS EXPANDED RANGE 2020 Our range of carbide rotary burrs is a high quality and comprehensive program. This includes a variety of designs and shapes to offer an ideal option for the majority of applications in all major industry segments. NEW We have added to our assortment with a new line of burrs for Superalloys and bolt removal. FEATURES AND BENEFITS • The combination of premium grade materials for both the shank and head, with the precise production NEW process, results in the creation of a consistent and • Our alloy specific range has been designed to meet secure program of tools. the most demanding metal finishing needs on nickel • Material specific designs offer improved performance and titanium components in high tech industries, such and up to 50% higher metal removal rates over as aerospace and power generation. standard carbide burrs. SHANK BRAZING • Toughened and hardened steel shanks • Special brazing elements provide excellent braze • Provides rigidity and strength strength • Prevents bending and reduces vibration, resulting in • Excellent impact strength to withstand high forces improved tool life • Able to withstand higher temperature without failing • Ground to h6 (carbide) and h7 (steel) for improved holding CUT STYLES ST VA AL ST CUT VA CUT ALUMINIUM CUT First choice for high First choice for high First choice for Non ferrous performance machining of performance machining materials and Plastics Steels of Stainless steels • High helix and large flute • Material specific chip breaker
    [Show full text]
  • Welding ABSTRACT Units Are General Safety, Basic Metalworking Tools, Layout, Bench Metal Casting, Welding, Metal Finishing, Plan
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 223 837 CE 034 374 TITLE lndustrial Arts Curriculum Guide in Basic Metals. Bulletin No. 1685. INSTITUTION Louisiana State Dept. of Education, Baton Rouge. Div. of Vocational Education. PUB DATE Sep 82 NOTE 127p.; For related documents, see CE 034 372-375. PUB TYPE Guides Classroom Use Guides (For Teachers) (052) EDRS PRICE MF01/PC06 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS Behavioral Objectives; *Course Content; Curriculum Guides; Equipment Utilization; Hand Tools; *Industrial Arts; Instructional Materials; Learning Activities; Machine Tools; Metal Industry; *Metals; *Metal Working; Planning; *Program Implementation; Safety; Secondary Education; Sheet Metal Wolk; *Trade and Industrial Education; Vocational Education; Welding IDENTIFIERS *Louisiana ABSTRACT This curriculum guide contains operational guidelines to help local-administrators, teacher educators, and industrial arts teachers in the State of Louisiana determine the extent to which their basic metals courses are meeting the needs of the youth they serve. It consists of a discussion of course prerequisites, goals, content, and implementation as well as 16 units devoted to various subject areas addressed in a basic metals course. Covered in the units are general safety, basic metalworking tools, layout, bench metalwork, sheet metal, art metal, ornamental metalwork, forging, metal casting, welding, metal finishing, planning, careers in metalworking, and basic metals projects. Each unit contains some or all of the following: objectives, time allotments, suggested topics, student activities, teacher activities, resources, and a unit inventory listing necessary tools and equipment. Among those items appended to the guide are safety rules, steps in making a layout, samples of basic metals projects, a sample student-planning sheet, suggestions for measuring achievement, sample test questions, techniques for conducting classes and for motivating students, and a list of resource materials.
    [Show full text]
  • Article in Cutting Tool Engineering (June 2002)
    CUTTING TOOL ENGINEERING / June 2002 Out of Touch Tools and technologies for removing hard-to-reach burrs. Removing hard-to-reach burrs, such as those that form at internal cross-hole intersections, can be a real pain. Vibratory tumblers often are not an option because of the media these systems use. The media are either too large to reach the area in need of deburring or, if small enough to gain access, some of them become lodged in the part. Attempting to remove these types of burrs manually can create problems, too. Rotary files often produce inconsistent results. Presented here are some of the technologies and cutting tools that effectively and consistently deburr hard-to-reach burrs: electrochemical machining, thermal deburring, chemical deburring, abrasive-flow machining, waterjet deburring and spindle-driven carbide deburring tools. The Cationic Method Electrolytic cationic deburring is an effective method for removing hard-to-reach burrs. Also known as electrochemical machining (ECM), this sophisticated process involves pumping an electrolyte solution, such as sodium chloride or sodium nitride, through the space between the electrode tool (cathode) and the workpiece (anode). Workpieces receive a positive charge from anode contacts mounted on the fixture. Material is selectively removed from the positively charged workpiece when the electrolyte is flushed between it and a negatively charged electrode. There is no direct contact between the tool and workpiece, so there is no part or tool wear, distortion or mechanical stress. ECM also doesn’t produce a recast layer, said Joe Zmick, division manager for Cation, a Troy, Mich., ECM job shop. Zmick said any workpiece that’s conductive is suitable for the process.
    [Show full text]
  • Layout and Fabrication of Sheet-Metal and Fiber-Glass Duct
    CHAPTER 2 LAYOUT AND FABRICATION OF SHEET-METAL AND FIBER-GLASS DUCT As a Steelworker you are required to operate If you require information on blueprints, you will find sheet-metal tools and to apply basic sheet-metal layout chapters 1-3 and 8 of Blueprint Reading and techniques. In many Naval Construction Force (NCF) Sketching, NAVEDTRA 10077-F1, an excellent projects, sheet metal is used to protect the exterior of reference. buildings by using flashing, gutters, and at times, Layout tools are used for laying out fabrication complete sheet-metal roofing systems. Other items jobs on metal. Some of the more common layout tools made from sheet metal are dust collection systems, that you will use in performing layout duties are as machinery guards, lockers, and shelving. follows: scriber, flat steel square, combination square, Although many of the parts and fittings used in protractor, prick punch, dividers, trammel points, and sheet-metal work are stock items, which are simply circumference rule. installed or assembled, Steelworkers are required to fabricate parts and fittings frequently in the shop or to Scriber modify them to fit irregularities in the project design. Therefore, you must have knowledge not only in Lines are scribed on sheet metal with a SCRATCH laying out patterns but also have the skills required to AWL, coupled with a STEEL SCALE or a cut, bend, shape, assemble, and install the finished STRAIGHTEDGE. To obtain the best results in sheet-metal products. This chapter describes some of scribing, hold the scale or straightedge firmly in place, the methods of measuring, marking, cutting, forming, and set the point of the scriber as close to the edge of and joining as well as installing sheet-metal sections, the scale as possible by tilting the scriber outward.
    [Show full text]
  • Sheet Metal Working
    Production Engineering II 2.2 Sheet Metal Working AAiT Sheet metal forming • Sheet metal working includes cutting and forming operations performed on relatively thin sheet of metal. • Typical sheet-metal thickness are 0.4 and 6mm, when thickness exceeds 6mm the stock is referred to as plate rather than sheet. • The sheet or plate which used for sheet metal working are produced by rolling. 6/9/2013 Production Engineering II 2 Parts made by sheet and plate metal: • Automobile bodies, airplanes, railway cars, locomotives, farm and construction equipment ,appliances, office furniture and etc. Advantages of sheet metal working: High strength, good dimensional accuracy, good surface finish, relatively low cost. For components that must be made in large quantities, economical mass production can be designed. 6/9/2013 Production Engineering II 3 • Most sheet metal processing is performed at room temperature ( cold working ), except when the stock is thick, the metal is brittle, or the deformation is significant it uses warm or hot working. • Most sheet metal operations are performed on machine tools called presses. The term stamping press is used to distinguish this presses from forging & extrusion presses. • The tooling that performs sheet metal work is called a punch-and die. To facilitate mass production, the sheet metal is often presented to the press as long stripes or coils. 6/9/2013 Production Engineering II 4 Sheet metal working Sheet metals are categorized into three major processes: 1. cutting, 2. Bending, and 3. drawing 1. Cutting operations • Used to separate large sheets into smaller pieces, to cut out part perimeters, and to make holes in parts.
    [Show full text]
  • Study on Burr Formation in Turning
    STUDY ON BURR FORMATION IN TURNING Álisson Rocha Machado Almir Kazuo Kaminise Marcio Bacci da Silva Rafael Gonçalves Ariza Universidade Federal de Uberlândia, Faculdade de Engenharia Mecânica, Bloco 1M Campus Santa Mônica, 38400089, Uberlândia, MG, Brazil, [email protected] Abstract: Several deburring processes have been used for burr removal, rising the cost of the part machined and affecting productivity. Deburring processes depend on the type of burr formed and includes grinding, chamfering among others. Although important in machining operations there are few works concentrated on burr prevention, elimination or minimisation. The complexity of the parameters involved and the difficulty to control them have directed the works to the effect instead of to the cause of burr formation. According to the literature it is impossible to avoid burr formation, however, it can be possible change some characteristics and properties of the burrs to facilitate its reduction after the cut or to decrease its dimensions to acceptable magnitudes. This work presents a study of burr formation for semi-orthogonal cutting operation of carbon steel. The burrs are analysed and measured using scanning electronic microscope and tool microscope. The results showed that the cutting conditions and tool geometry control the characteristics of the burrs. Feed rate and entering angle are the main cutting parameters affecting burr dimensions. Microhardness results also show that the material is highly hardened during the process of burr formation. Keywords: Burr, Turning, Machining 1. Introduction Burr formation is one of the main problems on cutting operations of metals. It is detrimental to the cut and can cause premature failure of the tool, geometrical error in the workpiece and may result in a serious problem on assembly.
    [Show full text]
  • An Experimental Study on Burr Formation in Turning
    ISSN(Online) : 2319-8753 ISSN (Print) : 2347-6710 International Journal of Innovative Research in Science, Engineering and Technology (An ISO 3297: 2007 Certified Organization) Vol. 5, Issue 3, March 2016 An Experimental Study on Burr Formation in Turning NibirSaha1, DebajitTalukdar2, Kamal Upadhaya3, ChayadBarbhuiya4, ManjuriHazarika5, B.E. Student, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Assam Engineering College, Guwahati, Assam, India1 B.E. Student, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Assam Engineering College, Guwahati, Assam, India2 B.E. Student, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Assam Engineering College, Guwahati, Assam, India3 B.E. Student, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Assam Engineering College, Guwahati, Assam, India4 Associate Professor, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Assam Engineering College, Guwahati, Assam, India5 ABSTRACT:Burrs are undesirable extended surface over a workpiece. In turning operation, burrs are mainly formed at the side of the workpiece where the tool loses contact with the workpiece. Burr removal processes are costly and time consuming, so it is desirable to remove burrs at the initial stage. However, it is impossible to remove burr completely, therefore efforts are on to minimize it. In turning, process parameters affect burr heights to a large extent. A proper combination of process parameters can lessen burr height.The present experimental work studies the variation of burr height in turning of aluminium workpiecewith respect to the change in process parameters, viz. feed, cutting velocity and depth of cut. The experimental work is carried out in CNC lathe and the burr heights are measured with a profile projector. It is observed that generally burr height increases with feed, cutting velocity and depth of cut. However, the ranges of feed and cutting velocity used also affect the trend of increasing or decreasing burr height.
    [Show full text]