DOCSLIB.ORG

Azerbaijan Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

BP in Azerbaijan Sustainability Report 2013 bp.com/caspian Building a stronger, safer BP About our report This report covers the calendar year ending 31 December 2013. In some instances significant events from 2014 have been included. Unless otherwise specified, the text does not distinguish between the activities of BP p.l.c. and those of its subsidiaries and affiliates. References in this report to ‘us’, ‘we’ and ‘our’ relate to BP in Azerbaijan unless otherwise stated. When we cite ‘BP in Azerbaijan’ we refer to operations in Azerbaijan only. If we refer to ‘BP AGT’ we are including all our activities in Azerbaijan, Georgia and Turkey. Specific references to ‘BP’ and the ‘BP group’ mean BP p.l.c., its subsidiaries and affiliates. All dollar amounts are in US dollars. All gas volumes are indicated in standard cubic metres or standard cubic feet. The report is issued annually by BP Exploration (Caspian Sea) Limited in its capacities as operator and manager of the joint operating company for the Azeri-Chirag-Deepwater Gunashli field, as manager of The Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan Pipeline Company and by BP Exploration (Shah Deniz) Limited in its capacities as operator of the Shah Deniz field and as technical operator of The South Caucasus Pipeline Company. For this report each of these entities has provided information relevant to its project and statements applicable to its project. Front cover imagery Find out more online The Sangachal terminal is one of the world’s Our bilingual website, largest integrated oil and gas processing bp.com/caspian, is the main terminals. It is a central hub for BP’s oil and gas information source about our operations in the Caspian region. Caspian region energy projects. Centre photo: Around one thousand people work continuously at the terminal to maintain safe and reliable operations of this strategic hub. Left photo: The Caspian Technician Training Centre located in the terminal area provides world-class training to the newly recruited technicians. These include classroom activities, production simulation and a large fully-equipped workshop. Right photo: View of the processing area at the Sangachal terminal. The oil and gas processed at the terminal is transported through the pipeline links to the regional and global markets. bp.com/caspian bp.com Browse through latest news, project This site contains information about the details, environmental and social impact BP group including detail of the company’s assessments, legal agreements governing policies and values, reports on its activities the projects, civil society monitoring and operations worldwide and the group’s reports and BP’s responses, earlier BP in sustainability reviews. Azerbaijan sustainability reports and other documents. ecbaku.com This site provides up-to-date information about development projects and gives Cautionary statement useful insights on how to work with BP and other international and local companies. BP in Azerbaijan Sustainability Report 2013 contains forward-looking statements relating, in particular, to recoverable volumes and resources, capital, operating and other expenditures, and future projects. Actual results may differ from such statements depending on a variety of factors including supply and demand developments, pricing and operational issues and political, legal, fiscal, commercial and social circumstances. Overview Overview What’s 2 Introduction 3 BP in Azerbaijan at a glance Gordon Birrell reflects on the highlights of our Our organization at a glance, our history, activities in 2013 and touches upon our future summary of our major achievements and inside? plans. challenges in 2013. Focus areas BP in Azerbaijan Sustainability 8 Our operations 36 Environment We operate large offshore hydrocarbon assets in Managing our environmental performance from Our operations Report 2013 covers our business the Caspian and manage pipeline links to regional exploration and the development of new projects performance, environmental and world markets. to production. record and wider role in Azerbaijan during 2013. It is our 20 Our people 44 Society How we improve the way we manage and We aim to have a positive impact on society eleventh sustainability report and develop our people to provide the foundation for and the local economy through our projects in reflects feedback we received BP’s long-term success in Azerbaijan. education, community, enterprise development about previous reports. and co-operation in revenue transparency. 29 Safety Our people Focusing on achieving safe, reliable and compliant operations and putting safety and operational risk management at the heart of everything we do. Our reporting and key performance indicators 55 Report process and feedback We have reviewed BP in Azerbaijan We aim to provide a full and transparent account Sustainability Report 2013 in order to of our performance and activities and to respond provide assurance to BP management that Safety to stakeholder feedback. the data, statements and assertions made regarding the sustainability performance of 56 Five-year performance data BP in Azerbaijan are supported by evidence or explanation. Our scope of work and Our key performance data covering areas including conclusions can be found on page 57. production, safety, environment and social spend. Ernst & Young Introduction to the assurance process Environment Society Our reporting BP in Azerbaijan Sustainability Report 2013 1 Introduction by the president of the BP Azerbaijan-Georgia-Turkey region BP and its co-venturers are committed to helping Azerbaijan develop its hydrocarbon resources safely and reliably for the benefit of the country. Gordon Birrell I am delighted to introduce the eleventh issue of Keeping our promise of safe and At the same time, the Shah Deniz production the BP in Azerbaijan Sustainability Report. reliable delivery sharing agreement was extended up to 2048, meaning that BP and its partners in Azerbaijan can For more than a decade, BP has produced this Enhancing our production, safely and responsibly, move ahead with appraising future stages of Shah annual report as part of our commitment to is an important aspect of our operations. During Deniz. communicating publicly about what we do in the 2013, we made good progress in implementing country and how we do it. our plans to optimize production that we agreed Our knowledge of the ACG field has led us to believe there may be large natural gas resources in In Azerbaijan, we operate the super-giant Azeri- with our partners and the government of the deeper reaches of ACG that can be developed Chirag-Deepwater Gunashli (ACG) oil field and the Azerbaijan. We expect our joint efforts will in support of Azerbaijan’s plans to expand its new huge Shah Deniz natural gas field, as well as the continue to take us step by step towards our supplier role. world-scale Sangachal terminal and major oil and commitment to maximize field recovery. gas export pipelines. The Chirag oil project was a major part of this Throughout 2013, our teams in Azerbaijan continued the massive task of processing data This year we celebrate the 20th anniversary of the commitment. Sanctioned back in 2010, from a 3D seismic survey on the prospective signing of the ACG production sharing agreement, the $6 billion project was designed to boost oil Shafag-Asiman structure. known as ‘the Contract of the Century’. What production from the ACG field through the new started as a vision in 1994 has turned into an West Chirag platform. It was completed safely Striving to be a responsible corporate enduring success story. With our co-venturers, we with no day away from work cases. The heaviest citizen and a good employer have designed and built world-class infrastructure platform ever installed in the Caspian, West Chirag Our programme for graduate recruitment remains to help Azerbaijan develop its hydrocarbon successfully started production in January 2014. popular among Azerbaijani youth, breaking a new resources safely and reliably for the benefit of the We believe that with the right production plans in record in 2013 with more than 4,300 applications. country. place and the right technologies, combined with We celebrated the first graduation of our petro- optimal reservoir depletion plans, ACG can go on technical resource entry programme (PREP) in for decades to benefit Azerbaijan, our partners and September 2013. This programme is designed to the region as a world-class resource. support capability development among petro- technical graduates as they join BP in Azerbaijan. Working towards the energy future In addition to hiring a record number of 86 In parallel, the Shah Deniz Stage 2 project – one of graduates in 2013 we also increased PREP intake the largest new natural gas ventures in the world – to 81. has made good progress. In 2013, Shah Deniz partners confirmed the final pipeline routes, paving Together with our co-venturers, we continue the way for the Southern Corridor that will bring to support Azerbaijani students, who pursue Shah Deniz gas to Europe. undergraduate and graduate studies in engineering and geosciences. In 2013, seven graduate and 25 The efforts put into this project by many teams undergraduate students benefitted from our joint culminated in the signing of the final investment scholarship programme. decision in Baku on 17 December. This truly historic milestone opens a new chapter in the development of Caspian hydrocarbons and establishes Azerbaijan as an important energy supplier to Europe. 2 BP in Azerbaijan Sustainability Report 2013 BP in Azerbaijan Overview at a glance Our structure, organization, assets and history. Through co-operation agreements with the State Legal structure Transportation and storage Oil Company of the Republic of Azerbaijan and the A number of BP legal entities have registered (at year end 2013) Baku Higher Oil School in November, we formally representative offices in Azerbaijan reflecting the Transportation: Sangachal terminal – an oil reaffirmed our long-held pledge to create a strong evolution of BP’s presence in the country and the and gas processing terminal south of Baku.
Recommended publications
  • The Project Financing of Cross-Border Pipelines a Presentation to the Energy Charter Workshop Brussels

    The Project Financing of Cross-Border Pipelines a Presentation to the Energy Charter Workshop Brussels

    The Project Financing of Cross-Border Pipelines a presentation to the Energy Charter Workshop Brussels by Rubin Weston Chadbourne & Parke 17 October 2006 Regis House, 45 King William Street London EC4R 9AN Tel: +44 (0) 20 7337 8031 [email protected] © 2006, CHADBOURNE & PARKE All Rights Reserved Chadbourne & Parke: Legal Leaders in Energy Representing EBRD on the $180 million and $170 million financings of LUKoil’s and SOCAR’s respective investments in the Shah Deniz gas field and the South Caucasus Gas Pipeline Representing SOCAR on a $750 million loan facility in respect of the repayment of carry financing provided by TPAO and Exxon in respect of the ACG oil field and the financing of future cash calls Representing IFC on a $82 million loan to SC Petrotel-Lukoil SA to finance the modernisation of its refinery in Ploesti, Romania Represented Black Sea Trade and Development Bank and IFC on the financing of the Galata Gas Field, located offshore of Varna, Bulgaria in the Black Sea, the first limited recourse upstream project financing in the Black Sea Represented Transneft on a US $150 million syndicated receivable based financing facility arranged by Raiffeisen, Transneft’s first syndicated loan Represented IFC on the financing for a portion of LUKoil’s share of development of the Karachaganak field, the largest limited recourse petroleum project financing in Kazakhstan Represented Nations Energy on a US $150 million syndicated financing arranged by CSFB for the development of the Karazhanbas oil field in Kazakhstan and the
  • The Struggle for Democratic Environmental Governance Around

    The Struggle for Democratic Environmental Governance Around

    The struggle for democratic environmental governance around energy projects in post-communist countries: the role of civil society groups and multilateral development banks by Alda Kokallaj A thesis submitted to the Faculty of Graduate and Postdoctoral Affairs in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Political Science Carleton University Ottawa, Ontario © 2014 Alda Kokallaj Abstract This dissertation focuses on the struggle for democratic environmental governance around energy projects in post-communist countries. What do conflicts over environmental implications of these projects and inclusiveness reveal about the prospects for democratic environmental governance in this region? This work is centred on two case studies, the Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan oil pipeline and the Vlora Industrial and Energy Park. These are large energy projects supported by the governments of Azerbaijan, Georgia and Albania, and by powerful international players such as oil businesses, multilateral development banks (MDBs), the European Union and the United States. Analysis of these cases is based on interviews with representatives of these actors and civil society groups, narratives by investigative journalists, as well as the relevant academic literature. I argue that the environmental governance of energy projects in the post-communist context is conditioned by the interplay of actors with divergent visions about what constitutes progressive development. Those actors initiating energy projects are shown to generally have the upper hand in defining environmental governance outcomes which align with their material interests. However, the cases also reveal that the interaction between civil society and MDBs creates opportunities for society at large, and for non-government organizations who seek to represent them, to have a greater say in governance outcomes – even to the point of stopping some elements of proposed projects.
  • Azerbaijan 2021 Energy Policy Review Co-Funded by the European Union

    Azerbaijan 2021 Energy Policy Review Co-Funded by the European Union

    Co-funded by the European Union Azerbaijan 2021 Energy Policy Review Co-funded by the European Union Azerbaijan 2021 Energy Policy Review INTERNATIONAL ENERGY AGENCY The IEA examines IEA member IEA association the full spectrum countries: countries: of energy issues including oil, gas Australia Brazil and coal supply and Austria China demand, renewable Belgium India energy technologies, Canada Indonesia electricity markets, Czech Republic Morocco energy efficiency, Denmark Singapore access to energy, Estonia South Africa demand side Finland Thailand management and France much more. Through Germany its work, the IEA Greece advocates policies Hungary that will enhance Ireland the reliability, Italy affordability and Japan sustainability of Korea energy in its 30 Luxembourg member countries, Mexico 8 association Netherlands countries and New Zealand beyond. Norway Poland Portugal Slovak Republic Spain Sweden Switzerland Turkey United Kingdom United States The European Commission also participates in the work of the IEA Please note that this publication is subject to specific restrictions that limit its use and distribution. The terms and conditions are available online at www.iea.org/t&c/ Source: IEA. All rights reserved. International Energy Agency Website: www.iea.org Foreword The International Energy Agency (IEA) has been conducting in-depth peer reviews of the energy policies of its member countries – and of other countries – since 1976, and it recently modernised these reviews to focus on some of the countries’ key energy transition and security challenges. FOREWORD Azerbaijan is one of the focus countries of the EU4Energy programme, which is carried out by the IEA and the European Union along with the Energy Community Secretariat and the Energy Charter Secretariat.
  • Caspian Oil and Gas Complements Other IEA Studies of Major Supply Regions, Such As Middle East Oil and Gas and North African Oil and Gas

    Caspian Oil and Gas Complements Other IEA Studies of Major Supply Regions, Such As Middle East Oil and Gas and North African Oil and Gas

    3 FOREWORD The Caspian region contains some of the largest undeveloped oil and gas reserves in the world. The intense interest shown by the major international oil and gas companies testifies to its potential. Although the area is unlikely to become “another Middle East”, it could become a major oil supplier at the margin, much as the North Sea is today. As such it could help increase world energy security by diversifying global sources of supply. Development of the region’s resources still faces considerable obstacles. These include lack of export pipelines and the fact that most new pipeline proposals face routing difficulties due to security of supply considerations,transit complications and market uncertainties. There are also questions regarding ownership of resources, as well as incomplete and often contradictory investment regimes. This study is an independent review of the major issues facing oil and gas sector developments in the countries along the southern rim of the former Soviet Union that are endowed with significant petroleum resources: Azerbaijan, Kazakstan,Turkmenistan and Uzbekistan. Caspian Oil and Gas complements other IEA studies of major supply regions, such as Middle East Oil and Gas and North African Oil and Gas. It also expands on other IEA studies of the area, including Energy Policies of the Russian Federation and Energy Policies of Ukraine. The study was undertaken with the co-operation of the Energy Charter Secretariat, for which I would like to thank its Secretary General, Mr. Peter Schütterle. Robert Priddle Executive Director 5 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The IEA wishes to acknowledge the very helpful co-operation of the Energy Charter Secretariat, with special thanks to Marat Malataev, Temuri Japaridze, Khamidulah Shamsiev and Galina Romanova.
  • The Role of Greece in Europe's Southern Gas Corridor Strategy

    The Role of Greece in Europe's Southern Gas Corridor Strategy

    Policy Paper / Κείμεμο Πολιτικής No 17 / February 2012 A Strategic Challenge: The role of Greece in Europe’s Southern Gas Corridor Strategy Dr. Thanos Dokos / Director General, ELIAMEP Dr. Theodoros Tsakiris / ELIAMEP Coordinator Geopolitics of Energy Programme 1 PP No 17 | February 2012 A Strategic Challenge: The role of Greece in Europe’s Southern Gas Corridor Strategy Thanos Dokos, Theodoros Tsakiris Copyright © 2012 Hellenic Foundation for European & Foreign Policy (ELIAMEP) 49, Vas. Sofias Ave, 106 76 Athens, Greece Tel.: +30 210 7257 110 | Fax: +30 210 7257 114 | www.eliamep.gr | [email protected] All Rights Reserved A Strategic Challenge: The role of Greece in Europe’s Southern Gas Corridor Strategy by Dr. Thanos Dokos / Director General, ELIAMEP Dr. Theodoros Tsakiris / Coordinator ELIAMEP Geopolitics of Energy Programme with the contribution of Dr. Ioannis Armakolas, “STAVROS COSTOPOULOS” Research Fellow ELIAMEP offers a forum for debate on international and European issues. Its non-partisan character supports the right to free and well documented discourse. ELIAMEP publications aim to contribute to scholarly knowledge and to provide policy relevant analyses. As such, they solely represent the views of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the Foundation. 2 Table of Contents Executive Summary .......................................................................................................................................5 Main conclusions ...........................................................................................................................................5
  • Problems of Muslim Belief in Azerbaijan: Historical and Modern Realities

    Problems of Muslim Belief in Azerbaijan: Historical and Modern Realities

    ISSN 2707-4013 © Nariman Gasimoglu СТАТТІ / ARTICLES e-mail: [email protected] Nariman Gasimoglu. Problems of Muslim Belief іn Azerbaijan: Historical аnd Modern Realities. Сучасне ісламознавство: науковий журнал. Острог: Вид-во НаУОА, 2020. DOI: 10.25264/2707-4013-2020-2-12-17 № 2. C. 12–17. Nariman Gasimoglu PROBLEMS OF MUSLIM BELIEF IN AZERBAIJAN: HISTORICAL AND MODERN REALITIES Religiosity in Azerbaijan, the country where vast majority of population are Muslims, has many signs different to what is practiced in other Muslim countries. This difference in the first place is related to the historically established religious mentality of Azerbaijanis. Worth noting is that history of this country with its Shia Muslims majority and Sunni Muslims minority have registered no serious incidents or confessional conflicts and clashes either on the ground of inter-sectarian confrontation or between Muslim and non-Muslim population. Azerbaijan has never had anti-Semitism either; there has been no fact of oppression of Jewish people living in Azerbaijan for many centuries. One of the interesting historic facts is that Molokans (ethnic Russians) who have left Tsarist Russia when challenged by religious persecution and found asylum in neighborhoods of Muslim populated villages of Azerbaijan have been living there for about two hundred years and never faced problems as a religious minority. Besides historical and political reasons, this should be related to tolerance in the religious mentality of Azerbaijanis as well. Features of religion in Azerbaijan: historical context Most of the people living in Azerbaijan were devoted to Tengriism (Tengriism had the most important place in the old belief system of ancient Turks), Zoroastrianism and Christianity before they embraced Islam.
  • AICT2016-Conference-Program.Pdf

    AICT2016-Conference-Program.Pdf

    10th IEEE International Conference on APPLICATION of INFORMATION and COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGIES CONFERENCE PROGRAM 12-14 October 2016, Baku, Azerbaijan www.aict.info/2016 10th IEEE International Conference on Application of Information and Communication Technologies CONFERENCE COMMITTEES: CONFERENCE HONORABLE CHAIRMEN Mr. Mikail Jabbarov, Minister of Education of Azerbaijan Mr. Ramin Guluzade, Minister of Communications and High Technologies of Azerbaijan CONFERENCE CHAIRMEN Professor Havar Mamedov, Rector of Qafqaz University, Azerbaijan Professor Abel Maharramov, Baku State University Rector, Azerbaijan Professor Nargiz Pashayeva, Lomonosov Moscow State University Baku branch Rector, Azerbaijan Assoc.Professor Elmar Gasimov, Baku Higher Oil School Rector, Azerbaijan Professor Mohn Harun Abdullah, University Malaysia Sabah Vice-Chancellor, Malaysia Professor Rasim Aliguliyev, Institute of Information Technologies of ANAS Director, Azerbaijan Professor Telman Aliyev, Institute of Control Systems of ANAS Director, Azerbaijan Professor Khalig Yahudov, Azerbaijan Technical University Rector, Azerbaijan Professor Manzoor H. Soomro, ECO Science Foundation (ECOSF) President, Pakistan Professor Alexander Khoroshilov, UNESCO Institute for Information Technologies in Education (IITE) CONFERENCE VICE CHAIRS Professor Niftali Gocayev, Qafqaz University, Azerbaijan Professor Aydin Kazimzadə, Baku State University, Azerbaijan Professor Azad Tagizade, Lomonosov Moscow State University Baku branch, Azerbaijan Professor Ramiz Humbetov, Baku Higher Oil School, Azerbaijan Assoc.Prof. Ag. Asri Ag. Ibrahim, University Malaysia Sabah, Malaysia Dr. Rashid Alakbarov, Institute of Information Technologies of ANAS Professor Oktaj Nusratov, Institute of Control Systems of ANAS 2 12-14 October 2016, Baku, Azerbaijan GENERAL CHAIR Assoc.Prof. Abzetdin Adamov, Qafqaz University, Azerbaijan TECHNICAL PROGRAM CO-CHAIRS Prof. H.Levent Akin, Bogazici University, Turkey Associate Prof. Vincent Guyot, ESIEA/LIP6, France Prof. Asoke Talukder, IIIT, Bangalore, India Prof.
  • BP in Azerbaijan Baku September 2006 Cautionary Statement

    BP in Azerbaijan Baku September 2006 Cautionary Statement

    BP in Azerbaijan Baku September 2006 Cautionary statement Forward looking statements: This presentation and the associated slides and discussion contain forward- looking statements, particularly those regarding oil and gas prices; expected start-up of Thunderhorse; the timing of other projects and their contribution to expected production, their estimated reserves and production capacity; production; the expected movement of non-proven resources to proved reserves; divestments and their effect; capital expenditure; and cash flow. By their nature, forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties because they relate to events and depend on circumstances that will or may occur in the future. Actual results may differ from those expressed in such statements, depending on a variety of factors, including the timing of bringing new fields on stream; future levels of industry product supply; demand and pricing; operational problems; general economic conditions; political stability and economic growth in relevant areas of the world; changes in laws and governmental regulations; exchange rate fluctuations; development and use of new technology; changes in public expectations and other changes in business conditions; the actions of competitors; natural disasters and adverse weather conditions; wars and acts of terrorism or sabotage; and other factors discussed elsewhere in this presentation. Cautionary Note to US Investors - The United States Securities and Exchange Commission permits oil and gas companies, in their filings with the SEC, to disclose only proved reserves that a company has demonstrated by actual production or formation tests to be economically and legally producible under existing economic and operating conditions. We use certain terms in this presentation, such as “resources” and “non-proven reserves”, that the SEC’s guidelines strictly prohibit us from including in our filings with the SEC.
  • BP in Azerbaijan Sustainability Report 2007

    BP in Azerbaijan Sustainability Report 2007

    BP in Azerbaijan Sustainability Report 2007 About this report The 2007 BP in Azerbaijan Sustainability Report covers our business 1 Foreword by the president of BP performance, environmental record and wider role in Azerbaijan during 2007. Azerbaijan Strategic Performance This is our fifth Sustainability Report and it reflects feedback we received about Unit (SPU) previous reports. Our earlier publications are available at www.bp.com/caspian. 2 Country context By 'sustainability' we mean the capacity to endure as a commercial organisation by 3 Achievements and challenges 4 Report concept, scope and renewing assets and by creating and delivering better products and services so that process we meet the evolving needs of society, attract successive generations of employees, 5 BP Azerbaijan SPU interests contribute to a sustainable environment and retain the trust and support of our 6 Chapter 1 – BP in Azerbaijan: customers, shareholders and the communities in which we operate. our operations 7 BP in Azerbaijan at a glance References in this report to 'us', 'we' and 'our' relate to BP in Azerbaijan unless otherwise stated. Specific ref- 10 BP in Azerbaijan in perspective erences to 'BP' and the 'BP group' mean BP p.l.c., its subsidiaries and affiliates. Unless otherwise specified, 11 Dialogue and engagement the text does not distinguish between the operations and activities of BP p.l.c. and those of its subsidiaries 14 Our projects and operations and affiliates. 20 Operating responsibly: - HSE management system - Safety A message from Ernst & Young - Environment This report has been substantiated by Ernst & Young, the BP group auditors. The - Health primary purpose of the report substantiation process is to test that the asser- 32 Security and human rights tions, claims and data set out in the text regarding BP’s sustainability perform- 34 People, compliance and ethics ance can be supported by evidence.
  • Energy and Security Cooperation in Asia Challenges and Prospects

    Energy and Security Cooperation in Asia Challenges and Prospects

    !"#$%&'(")'*#+,$-.&' /001#$(.-0"'-"'23-(' /4(55#"%#3'(")'6$031#+.3' !)-.#)'7&' /4$-3.014#$'8#"' 259-"'/4#:' Energy and Security Cooperation in Asia Challenges and Prospects Christopher Len Alvin Chew Editors Institute for Security and Development Policy Västra Finnbodavägen 2, 13130 Stockholm-Nacka, Sweden www.isdp.eu Energy and Security Cooperation in Asia: Challenges and Prospects is a Monograph published by the Institute for Security and Development Policy. Monographs provide comprehensive analyses of key issues presented by leading experts. The Institute is based in Stockholm, Sweden, and cooperates closely with research centers worldwide. Through its Silk Road Studies Program, the Institute runs a joint Transatlantic Research and Policy Center with the Central Asia-Caucasus Institute of Johns Hopkins Universi- ty’s School of Advanced International Studies. The Institute is firmly established as a leading research and policy center, serving a large and diverse community of analysts, scholars, policy-watchers, business leaders, and journalists. It is at the forefront of re- search on issues of conflict, security, and development. Through its applied research, publications, research cooperation, public lectures, and seminars, it functions as a focal point for academic, policy, and public discussion. This publication is kindly made possible by support from the Swedish Ministry for For- eign Affairs. The opinions and conclusions expressed are those of the author/s and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Institute for Security and Development Policy or its sponsors. © Institute for Security and Development Policy, 2009 ISBN: 978-91-85937-59-2 Printed in Singapore Cover Photo Credit: Data courtesy of Marc Imhoff of NASA GSFC and Christopher El- vidge of NOAA NGDC.
  • 10Th International Conference on AICT

    10Th International Conference on AICT

    10th IEEE International Conference on APPLICATION of INFORMATION and COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGIES CONFERENCE PROGRAM 12-14 October 2016, Baku, Azerbaijan www.aict.info/2016 10th IEEE International Conference on Application of Information and Communication Technologies CONFERENCE COMMITTEES: CONFERENCE HONORABLE CHAIRMEN Mr. Mikail Jabbarov, Minister of Education of Azerbaijan Mr. Ramin Guluzade, Minister of Communications and High Technologies of Azerbaijan CONFERENCE CHAIRMEN Professor Havar Mamedov, Rector of Qafqaz University, Azerbaijan Professor Abel Maharramov, Baku State University Rector, Azerbaijan Professor Nargiz Pashayeva, Lomonosov Moscow State University Baku branch Rector, Azerbaijan Assoc.Professor Elmar Gasimov, Baku Higher Oil School Rector, Azerbaijan Professor Mohn Harun Abdullah, University Malaysia Sabah Vice-Chancellor, Malaysia Professor Rasim Aliguliyev, Institute of Information Technologies of ANAS Director, Azerbaijan Professor Telman Aliyev, Institute of Control Systems of ANAS Director, Azerbaijan Professor Khalig Yahudov, Azerbaijan Technical University Rector, Azerbaijan Professor Manzoor H. Soomro, ECO Science Foundation (ECOSF) President, Pakistan Professor Alexander Khoroshilov, UNESCO Institute for Information Technologies in Education (IITE) CONFERENCE VICE CHAIRS Professor Niftali Gocayev, Qafqaz University, Azerbaijan Professor Aydin Kazimzadə, Baku State University, Azerbaijan Professor Azad Tagizade, Lomonosov Moscow State University Baku branch, Azerbaijan Professor Ramiz Humbetov, Baku Higher Oil School, Azerbaijan Assoc.Prof. Ag. Asri Ag. Ibrahim, University Malaysia Sabah, Malaysia Dr. Rashid Alakbarov, Institute of Information Technologies of ANAS Professor Oktaj Nusratov, Institute of Control Systems of ANAS 2 12-14 October 2016, Baku, Azerbaijan GENERAL CHAIR Assoc.Prof. Abzetdin Adamov, Qafqaz University, Azerbaijan TECHNICAL PROGRAM CO-CHAIRS Prof. H.Levent Akin, Bogazici University, Turkey Associate Prof. Vincent Guyot, ESIEA/LIP6, France Prof. Asoke Talukder, IIIT, Bangalore, India Prof.
  • Hotline Service of the Ministry of Education

    Hotline Service of the Ministry of Education

    Of all calls received by the Service 14678 are enquiries and 785 are complaints. InIn January January of of last last year year the the Service Service received received 1441, 1441, in in February February 1629, 1629, in in March March 1629, 1629, in in April April 1265, 1265, in Mayin May 1055, 1055, in June in June 1073, 1073, in July in July2385, 2385, in August in August 1196, 1196, in September in September 1441, 1441, in October in October 974, 974, in in November 613 and in December 762 calls. The analysis of the calls received by the Service shows that a community has been taking a close interestinterest in reforms in reforms implemented implemented in the in education the education field. field. Over Over 70% 70% of enquiries of enquiries were were about about the the organization,organization, conduction conduction of of the the centralized centralized exams exams for for the the recruitment recruitment of of teachers teachers to to schools schools and and their their results.results. Others Others were were about about programs programs implemented implemented in inthe the education education system, system, international international projects, projects, nationalnational and and international international subject subject Olympiads, Olympiads, funding funding of of education education system, system, study study abroad, abroad, additional additional education,education, admission admission to to the the different different levels levels of of education, education, and and queries queries regarding regarding the the new new assessment assessment systemsystem at at leaving leaving classes classes of of secondary secondary schools, schools, higher higher and and secondary secondary special special education education institutions.