DOCSLIB.ORG

Signature Redacted Signature of a Uthor:

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

INVESTIGATION OF CAUSES AND STRUCTURE OF SOCIAL ATTITUDES CONCERNING NUCLEAR RADIATION by Aditi Chandra B.Tech, Mechanical and Automation Engineering (2012) Amity University SUBMITTED TO THE DEPARTMENT OF NUCLEAR SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF SCIENCE IN NUCLEAR SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING AT THE MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY JUNE 2014 ,7SS HUSETTS INSTITUTE 2014 Massachusetts Institute of Technology All rights reserved. JUL 2 9 2014 LABRPAIES Signature redacted Signature of A uthor: ............................................ .. ................ Aditi Chandra Department of Nuclear Science and Engineering May 9, 2014 -Signature redacted Certified by: .! ....................................................................... Michael W. Golay Professor of Nuclear Science and Engineering 1107 Thesis Supervisor Signature redacted Certified by: ......... ............................................................ R. Scott Kemp Assistant Professor of Nuclear Science and Engineering Thesis Reader Signature redacted A ccepted by ......................... ........................................ Mujid S. Kazimi -ECO Professor of Nuclear Engineering Chair, Department Committee on Graduate Students INVESTIGATION OF CAUSES AND STRUCTURE OF SOCIAL ATTITUDES CONCERNING NUCLEAR RADIATION by Aditi Chandra Submitted to the Department of Nuclear Science and Engineering on May 9, 2014 in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science in Nuclear Science and Engineering ABSTRACT An individual's perception of radiation, termed as "Radiation Attitudes" in this work, is vital for understanding the stakeholder relationship dynamics for acceptance of controversial nuclear technology projects. Attitudes towards nuclear technology have been found to be different from those towards other technologies perceived as hazardous, such as hydraulic fracturing, genetic engineering or biohazard facilities. Even within the subset of nuclear technology, different applications invoke different reactions. Medical uses of the technology are generally viewed as positive, whereas nuclear power plants and radioactive waste management facilities can sometimes cause fear and anxiety in the minds of some people. This work explains the causes and structure of Radiation Attitudes, and the dynamics of the various factors influencing them. A historical analysis of the narratives concerning nuclear technology was used to identify the complex, social, political, cognitive and technological factors that played a significant role in the formation of Radiation Attitudes. A system dynamics approach was utilized to construct causal loop diagrams depicting the cause-effect relationships and interdependencies between the identified variables. Qualitative interviews were conducted to test the causal relationships hypothesized in the model for Radiation Attitudes. The purpose of the interviews was to understand individual beliefs that result in a particular Radiation Attitude, the bases for these beliefs, and the process of their formation. The interviews enabled verification of the variables and relationships in the model, and the identification of the most significant interdependencies and links. The hypothesized model for Radiation Attitudes correlated well with the infonration inferred from the interviews, making the first stage of validation a success. Thesis Supervisor: Michael W. Golay Title: Professor of Nuclear Science and Engineering Thesis Reader: R. Scott Kemp Title: Assistant Professor of Nuclear Science and Engineering Acknowledgments I would like to thank my thesis advisor, Professor Michael W. Golay, for his invaluable support and guidance throughout the course of this work. Working with him for the past two years has been an incredible learning experience, both professionally and academically. I would also like to acknowledge the United States Department of Energy for providing the funding for this work. I would like to thank my thesis reader, Professor R. Scott Kemp, for taking an interest in this work, and whose feedback greatly improved the quality of this thesis. I would also like to acknowledge the contribution made by Adam David Williams. I would like to thank my parents, for supporting me in all my endeavours. I would like to express gratitude to the all the professors and staff of the NSE department who have taught me and guided me throughout the time I have been here. I would also like to thank all my friends for helping me maintain a good work-life balance, and making my experience at MIT a truly unforgettable one. 3 Contents 1 Introduction 10 1.1 M otivation ...................... ................. 10 1.2 O bjectives ....... ........ ........ ....... ........ 11 1.3 Conflicts of Risk Perception between Experts and Laymen ... ....... ... 12 1.3.1 Cognitive Psychology Approach ....... ................ 13 2 System Dynamics Approach 16 2.1 Dynamics of Complex Systems ............................ 17 2.2 System Dynamics Tools ............................... 17 3 Models for Stakeholder Acceptance 19 3.1 Definition of Acceptance ............................... 19 3.2 Definition of a Stakeholder .............................. 19 3.3 Stock-Flow Diagram for Stakeholder Acceptance .................. 21 3.4 Causal Loop Diagram for Stakeholder Acceptance at the Local Level ........ 23 3.5 Causal Loop Diagram for Stakeholder Acceptance at the State and Federal Level . 26 3.6 Necessity for Addition of "Radiation Attitudes" to Model .............. 29 4 Identification of Variables for Causal Loop Diagram 30 4.1 Timeline of Nuclear Technology ...... .......... ......... .. 30 4.1.1 Late 19th Century to Early 20th Century- An Era of Scientific Discovery . 30 4.1.2 Discovery of Fission and the Manhattan Project . ......... ..... 31 4.1.3 The 1950s- Atoms for Peace and the Atomic Age .. ............ 33 4.1.4 The 1960s- The Cuban Missile Crisis and its After-Effects .... ..... 35 4 4.1.5 The 1970's - Anti-Nuclear Movements Gain Momentum ..... .... 36 4.1.6 Late 20th Century and the Chernobyl Accident ............... 37 4.1.7 The Yucca Mountain Controversy ...... ................ 38 4.1.8 The 21st Century -Nuclear Proliferation in Iran and North Korea ..... 39 4.1.9 The Fukushima Disaster and its Consequences ..... .......... 40 4.2 List of Important Variables ... .............. ............. 43 5 Construction of a Causal Loop Diagram (CLD) for Radiation Attitudes 45 5.1 Methodology .......................... ........... 45 5.2 Model Description ............................ ...... 45 5.3 Description of Identified Variables ......... ................. 46 5.4 Explanation of Important Interdependencies and Loops .. ............. 62 5.5 Testing the Model .............. .............. ....... 67 6 Validation of Model by Interview Data 73 6.1 Interview Method ........... .............. .......... 73 6.2 Interviews for Stakeholder Acceptance at the Local Level . ............. 74 6.3 Interviews for Stakeholder Acceptance at the State and Federal Level ....... 74 6.4 Interviews for Determining Radiation Attitudes .. ......... ........ 75 6.5 Selection of Interviewees . ......... .......... ......... .. 76 7 Interview Data and Analysis 77 7.1 Interview No. 1 .... ......... .......... ......... .... 77 7.1.1 Identification of Important Interdependencies and Loops ......... 78 7.1.2 Identification of Important Links .. ......... ......... ... 78 7.2 Interview No. 2 .... .............. .............. .... 80 5 7.2.1 Identification of Important Interdependencies and Loops 80 7.2.2 Identification of Important Links ........... ......... 81 7.3 Interview No. 3 ................... ...... .......... 83 7.3.1 Identification of Important Interdependencies and Loops .......... 83 7.3.2 Identification of Important Links .. .......... .......... 84 7.4 Interview No. 4 ....... .................. ... ...... 86 7.4.1 Identification of Important Interdependencies and Loops .......... 86 7.4.2 Identification of Important Links ........... ....... ... 86 7.5 Interview No. 5 ....... .................. .......... 88 7.5.1 Identification of Important Interdependencies and Loops .......... 88 7.5.2 Identification of Important Links ............ .......... 89 7.6 Interview No. 6 ........... .............. .......... 91 7.6.1 Identification of Important Interdependencies and Loops .......... 91 7.6.2 Identification of Important Links ............ .......... 92 7.7 Quantification of Responses ............ ...... .......... 94 7.8 R esults ............................. .... ...... 97 8 Conclusions 99 8.1 Recommendations for Future Work. .... ......... ......... .. 99 A Variable Definition & Quantification Table for Local & State/Federal CLDs 101 B Interview Questions 111 B. I Interview Questions for Stakeholder Acceptance at a Local Level . ....... 111 B.2 Interview Questions for Stakeholder Acceptance at the State and Federal Level . 112 B.3 Interview Questions for Determining Radiation Attitudes ....... ...... 113 6 C Description of MITR-II and Proposed Changes 116 D Detailed Interview Responses 119 D .1 Interview ee No. 1 ............ ....................... 119 D. 1.1 Responses to Questions related to the MIT Reactor and Proposed Fuel Change 119 D. 1.2 Summary of Responses to Questions related to Radiation Attitudes .. .. 120 D .2 Interview N o. 2 .. ............................ ...... 124 D.2.1 Summary of Responses related to Attitudes towards Hazardous Projects .. 124 D.2.2 Summary of Responses related to Radiation
Recommended publications
  • Reel Impact: Movies and TV at Changed History

    Reel Impact: Movies and TV at Changed History

    Reel Impact: Movies and TV Õat Changed History - "Õe China Syndrome" Screenwriters and lmmakers often impact society in ways never expected. Frank Deese explores the "The China Syndrome" - the lm that launched Hollywood's social activism - and the eect the lm had on the world's view of nuclear power plants. FRANK DEESE · SEP 24, 2020 Click to tweet this article to your friends and followers! As screenwriters, our work has the capability to reach millions, if not billions - and sometimes what we do actually shifts public opinion, shapes the decision-making of powerful leaders, perpetuates destructive myths, or unexpectedly enlightens the culture. It isn’t always “just entertainment.” Sometimes it’s history. Leo Szilard was irritated. Reading the newspaper in a London hotel on September 12, 1933, the great Hungarian physicist came across an article about a science conference he had not been invited to. Even more irritating was a section about Lord Ernest Rutherford – who famously fathered the “solar system” model of the atom – and his speech where he self-assuredly pronounced: “Anyone who expects a source of power from the transformation of these atoms is talking moonshine.” Stewing over the upper-class British arrogance, Szilard set o on a walk and set his mind to how Rutherford could be proven wrong – how energy might usefully be extracted from the atom. As he crossed the street at Southampton Row near the British Museum, he imagined that if a neutron particle were red at a heavy atomic nucleus, it would render the nucleus unstable, split it apart, release a lot of energy along with more neutrons shooting out to split more atomic nuclei releasing more and more energy and..
  • University of Cincinnati

    University of Cincinnati

    ! "# $ % & % ' % !" #$ !% !' &$ &""! '() ' #$ *+ ' "# ' '% $$(' ,) * !$- .*./- 0 #!1- 2 *,*- Atomic Apocalypse – ‘Nuclear Fiction’ in German Literature and Culture A dissertation submitted to the Graduate School of the University of Cincinnati In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTORATE OF PHILOSOPHY (Ph.D.) in the Department of German Studies of the College of Arts and Sciences 2010 by Wolfgang Lueckel B.A. (equivalent) in German Literature, Universität Mainz, 2003 M.A. in German Studies, University of Cincinnati, 2005 Committee Chair: Sara Friedrichsmeyer, Ph.D. Committee Members: Todd Herzog, Ph.D. (second reader) Katharina Gerstenberger, Ph.D. Richard E. Schade, Ph.D. ii Abstract In my dissertation “Atomic Apocalypse – ‘Nuclear Fiction’ in German Literature and Culture,” I investigate the portrayal of the nuclear age and its most dreaded fantasy, the nuclear apocalypse, in German fictionalizations and cultural writings. My selection contains texts of disparate natures and provenance: about fifty plays, novels, audio plays, treatises, narratives, films from 1946 to 2009. I regard these texts as a genre of their own and attempt a description of the various elements that tie them together. The fascination with the end of the world that high and popular culture have developed after 9/11 partially originated from the tradition of nuclear fiction since 1945. The Cold War has produced strong and lasting apocalyptic images in German culture that reject the traditional biblical apocalypse and that draw up a new worldview. In particular, German nuclear fiction sees the atomic apocalypse as another step towards the technical facilitation of genocide, preceded by the Jewish Holocaust with its gas chambers and ovens.
  • It's Not Just a Story Any More

    It's Not Just a Story Any More

    (reprinted with permission from The Guardian, 4 August 1979) It's not just a story any more The phrase 'China syndrome' describes what happens if a nuclear plant backfires. Walt Patterson casts a professional eye over the film of that name and finds it alarmingly accurate. At the end of The China Syndrome, if the house lights don't come up too soon, you may notice an inconspicuous line far down the credits. After Best Boy Grip and Paint Foreman comes Technical Advisers [Nuclear] … MHB Technical Associates. Nowhere else in the publicity pack from Columbia Pictures is there any further reference to the specific technical content of the film, or to the technical advisers responsible. The coyness is curious, but understandable. In The China Syndrome the technical content is of a very different order to that, say, in Moonraker. In Moonraker the technical content is there essentially to astonish; its genuine credibility is irrelevant. In The China Syndrome, on the contrary, the technical content is central to the plot – and is moreover acutely controversial. It is not now, mark you, as controversial as it was before March 28 this year. The China Syndrome, of course, is about – among other things – the threat of an accident at a nuclear power station. The accident at the Three Mile Island nuclear power station near Harrisburg, which occurred about a month after the release of the film, was a classical if unnerving example of life imitating art. When the film was released the nuclear industry was still talking about hypothetical accidents at nuclear stations.
  • In My Lifetime - the Film’S Mission

    In My Lifetime - the Film’S Mission

    1 In My Lifetime - The Film’s Mission http://thenuclearworld.org/category/in-my-lifetime/ This film is meant to be a wakeup call for humanity, to help develop an understanding of the realities of the nuclear weapon, to explore ways of presenting the answers for “a way beyond” and to facilitate a dialogue moving towards resolution of this Gordian knot of nuclear weapons gripping the world. The documentary’s characters are the narrative voices, interwoven with highly visual sequences of archival and contemporary footage and animation. The story is a morality play, telling the struggle waged over the past six and half decades with the last act yet to be determined, of trying to find what is “the way beyond?” Director’s Statement “In My Lifetime” takes on the complex realities of “the nuclear world”, and searches internationally for an answer to the question is there a Way Beyond? This documentary is part wake up call, part challenge for people to engage with the issue of ridding the world of the most destructive weapon ever invented. In February 2008, I began a journey to film and report on the story of the inner workings of the nuclear world. There has been a re-emergence of the realization that a world with nuclear weapons, including a proliferation of fissile nuclear materials, is a very dangerous place. Of course this realization has been known since the creation of the atomic bomb. It continues to be a struggle which has not been resolved. 2 This is a very complex issue with many voices, speaking from many perspectives, representing the forces and entrenched institutions in the nuclear states, not to speak of the rest of the world’s nations some of them with nuclear power capable of producing their own fissile materials and now there is the danger of so called “non-state actors”, who want to get their hands on the nuclear fissile materials necessary to create nuclear weapons.
  • 1 the Politics of Independence: the China Syndrome (1979)

    1 the Politics of Independence: the China Syndrome (1979)

    1 The Politics of Independence: The China Syndrome (1979), Hollywood Liberals and Antinuclear Campaigning Peter Krämer, University of East Anglia Abstract: This article draws, among other things, on press clippings files and scripts found in various archives to reconstruct the complex production history, the marketing and the critical reception of the nuclear thriller The China Syndrome (1979). It shows that with this project, several politically motivated filmmakers, most notably Jane Fonda, who starred in the film and whose company IPC Films produced it, managed to inject their antinuclear stance into Hollywood entertainment. Helped by the accident at the Three Mile Island nuclear power plant two weeks into the film’s release, The China Syndrome gained a high profile in public debates about nuclear energy in the U.S. Jane Fonda, together with her then husband Tom Hayden, a founding member of the 1960s “New Left” who had entered mainstream politics in the California Democratic Party by the late 1970s, complemented her involvement in the film with activities aimed at grass roots mobilisation against nuclear power. If the 1979 Columbia release The China Syndrome (James Bridges, 1979) is remembered today, it is mainly because of an astonishing coincidence. This thriller about an almost catastrophic accident at a nuclear power plant was released just twelve days before eerily similar events began to unfold at the Three Mile Island nuclear power plant near Harrisburg in Pennsylvania on 28 March 1979, resulting in, as the cover of J. Samuel Walker’s authoritative account of the event calls it, “the worst accident in the history of commercial nuclear power in the United States” (Walker).
  • China's Dilemma

    China's Dilemma

    CHINA’S DILEMMA i ii CHINA’S DILEMMA ECONOMIC GROWTH, THE ENVIRONMENT AND CLIMATE CHANGE Ligang Song and Wing Thye Woo (eds) Asia Pacific Press Brookings Institution Press SOCIAL SCIENCES ACADEMIC PRESS (CHINA) iii Co-published by ANU E Press and Asia Pacific Press The Australian National University Canberra ACT 0200 Australia Email: [email protected] This title available online at http://epress.anu.edu.au/china_dilemma_citation.html © 2008 ANU E Press, Asia Pacific Press, Brookings Institution Press and Social Sciences Academic Press (China) This work is copyright. Apart from those uses which may be permitted under the Copyright Act 1968 as amended, no part may be reproduced by any process without written permission from the publisher. Co-published with SOCIAL SCIENCES ACADEMIC PRESS (CHINA) C H I N A B O O K under the China Book International scheme. This scheme supports INTERNATIONAL co-publication of works with international publishers. National Library of Australia Cataloguing-in-Publication entry Title: China’s dilemma : economic growth, the environment and climate change / editors Ligang Song ; Wing Thye Woo. ISBN: 9780731538195 (pbk.) 9781921536038 (pdf.) Notes: Includes index. Bibliography. Subjects: Economic development--Environmental aspects--China. Climatic changes--China. Energy consumption--China. China--Economic conditions. China--Environmental conditions. Other Authors/Contributors: Song, Ligang. Woo, Wing Thye. Dewey Number: 338.900951 Cover design: Teresa Prowse Cover photo: Jason Lyon. iStockphoto, File Number: 2831996
  • The Inventory of the Michael Douglas Collection #1839

    The Inventory of the Michael Douglas Collection #1839

    The Inventory of the Michael Douglas Collection #1839 Howard Gotlieb Archival Research Center Douglas, Michael #1839 3/31/16, 4/7/16 Preliminary Listing I. Wardrobe. A. Costumes. Box 1-2 1. “The American President.” Box 3-8 2. “Behind the Candelabra.” Box 9 3. “Disclosure.” 4. “A Perfect Murder.” 5. “Romancing The Stone.” Box 9-14 6. “The Game.” Box 15-20 7. “The In-Laws.” Box 21-25 8. “It Runs In The Family.” Box 26 9. “Jewel Of The Nile.” Box 27-32 10. “Traffic.” Box 33-37 11. “Wonder Boys.” Box 38 12. “Wall Street.” B. Hanging Costumes. Pkg. 1-2 1. “The American President.” Pkg. 3-35 2. “Behind the Candelabra.” Pkg. 36-57 3. “The Game.” Pkg. 58-78 4. “The In-Laws.” Pkg. 79-116 5. “It Runs In The Family.” Pkg. 117 6. “Wall Street.” Box 39-56 C. Personal. Pkg. 118-124 D. Hanging Personal. II. Printed Materials. A. Files. Box 57-88 1. Clippings (not on their spreadsheets). Box 88 2. General. B. Blueprints/Maps. C. Internet printouts. D. Postcards. Box 89-91 E. Magazines. Box 92-94 F. Programs. Box 95 G. Newspapers. Box 95-96 H. Reviews. Box 96 I. Clippings. J. Booklets. K. Pamphlets. L. Fliers. Box 97 M. Posters. Pkg. 125-141 N. Oversized posters. Douglas, Michael (3/31/16, 4/7/16) Page 1 of 46 III. Film and Video. Box 98-131 A. VHS. Box 131 B. 8 mm cassettes. C. Mini-DVs. Box 132 D. DV-Cams. Box 133 E. DVDs. Box 134 F.
  • American Auteur Cinema: the Last – Or First – Great Picture Show 37 Thomas Elsaesser

    American Auteur Cinema: the Last – Or First – Great Picture Show 37 Thomas Elsaesser

    For many lovers of film, American cinema of the late 1960s and early 1970s – dubbed the New Hollywood – has remained a Golden Age. AND KING HORWATH PICTURE SHOW ELSAESSER, AMERICAN GREAT THE LAST As the old studio system gave way to a new gen- FILMFILM FFILMILM eration of American auteurs, directors such as Monte Hellman, Peter Bogdanovich, Bob Rafel- CULTURE CULTURE son, Martin Scorsese, but also Robert Altman, IN TRANSITION IN TRANSITION James Toback, Terrence Malick and Barbara Loden helped create an independent cinema that gave America a different voice in the world and a dif- ferent vision to itself. The protests against the Vietnam War, the Civil Rights movement and feminism saw the emergence of an entirely dif- ferent political culture, reflected in movies that may not always have been successful with the mass public, but were soon recognized as audacious, creative and off-beat by the critics. Many of the films TheThe have subsequently become classics. The Last Great Picture Show brings together essays by scholars and writers who chart the changing evaluations of this American cinema of the 1970s, some- LaLastst Great Great times referred to as the decade of the lost generation, but now more and more also recognised as the first of several ‘New Hollywoods’, without which the cin- American ema of Francis Coppola, Steven Spiel- American berg, Robert Zemeckis, Tim Burton or Quentin Tarantino could not have come into being. PPictureicture NEWNEW HOLLYWOODHOLLYWOOD ISBN 90-5356-631-7 CINEMACINEMA ININ ShowShow EDITEDEDITED BY BY THETHE
  • The Guardian, April 3, 1979

    The Guardian, April 3, 1979

    Wright State University CORE Scholar The Guardian Student Newspaper Student Activities 4-3-1979 The Guardian, April 3, 1979 Wright State University Student Body Follow this and additional works at: https://corescholar.libraries.wright.edu/guardian Part of the Mass Communication Commons Repository Citation Wright State University Student Body (1979). The Guardian, April 3, 1979. : Wright State University. This Newspaper is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Activities at CORE Scholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in The Guardian Student Newspaper by an authorized administrator of CORE Scholar. For more information, please contact [email protected]. weather thought Strong easterly winds will briog radiation from Harrisburg. Penn- No one was sylvania to the Dayton area. Scientists warn people to not drink milk, ro eipect an increase thinking today. in birth defects and a lack of hair, FALL-OUT and death. The Daily Gardenia If it happened today, it's news to us April Kplus 2), 1979 issue forth ' Vol. ^Aqt. Dayton, Ohio Rain keeps WSU open Bv CHUCK STEVENS UNIVERSITY President Robert simply don't have the equipment Gardenia Managing Editor Kegerreis was vacationing on his for removing mass amounts of Executive Director of Campus yacht and was unavailable for tain," he said. He went on 10 note Planning and Operations Robert comment. that it would have been better to Francis recommended that Assistant Director of Security close school during the duration Wright State remain open today Carl Sims and Assistant Director of the storm and then "long despite the heavy rainstorm hov- of Parking Eddie Cooper told the enough for the ground to absorb ering over the area.
  • Antinuclear Politics, Atomic Culture, and Reagan Era Foreign Policy

    Antinuclear Politics, Atomic Culture, and Reagan Era Foreign Policy

    Selling the Second Cold War: Antinuclear Cultural Activism and Reagan Era Foreign Policy A dissertation presented to the faculty of the College of Arts and Sciences of Ohio University In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy William M. Knoblauch March 2012 © 2012 William M. Knoblauch. All Rights Reserved. 2 This dissertation titled Selling the Second Cold War: Antinuclear Cultural Activism and Reagan Era Foreign Policy by WILLIAM M. KNOBLAUCH has been approved for the Department of History and the College of Arts and Sciences by __________________________________ Chester J. Pach Associate Professor of History __________________________________ Howard Dewald Dean, College of Arts and Sciences 3 ABSTRACT KNOBLAUCH, WILLIAM M., Ph.D., March 2012, History Selling the Second Cold War: Antinuclear Cultural Activism and Reagan Era Foreign Policy Director of Dissertation: Chester J. Pach This dissertation examines how 1980s antinuclear activists utilized popular culture to criticize the Reagan administration’s arms buildup. The 1970s and the era of détente marked a decade-long nadir for American antinuclear activism. Ronald Reagan’s rise to the presidency in 1981 helped to usher in the “Second Cold War,” a period of reignited Cold War animosities that rekindled atomic anxiety. As the arms race escalated, antinuclear activism surged. Alongside grassroots movements, such as the nuclear freeze campaign, a unique group of antinuclear activists—including publishers, authors, directors, musicians, scientists, and celebrities—challenged Reagan’s military buildup in American mass media and popular culture. These activists included Fate of the Earth author Jonathan Schell, Day After director Nicholas Meyer, and “nuclear winter” scientific-spokesperson Carl Sagan.
  • A Life in the Shadow of the Bomb

    A Life in the Shadow of the Bomb

    A Life in the Shadow of the Bomb I am a child of the atomic age. The atomic bomb, that is, the threat of nuclear war and mass destruction, has been in my consciousness—sometimes in the background but frequently in the foreground—nearly all of my life. I was born on August 9, 1945 at the Lying Inn Hospital of the University of Chicago, the day that the second atomic bomb was dropped in Japan on the city of Nagasaki, killing tens of thousands of people. My birthplace, the U of C, was also the birthplace of the atomic bomb, which had been conceived there a couple of years before. Enrico Fermi and other scientists in the Manhattan Project carried out the first chain reaction on December 2, 1942 in a secret laboratory hidden in the university’s football stadium. Of course, when I let out my first shriek at the shock of birth and the awakening into life, I knew nothing of any of that. I first became conscious of the issue of nuclear war when I was eight years old. My parents had moved to Whittier, California, where my father was to manage a Co-op Grocery Store. The local public elementary school that I attended held “duck-and-cover” drills and we students had to get under our desks and put our hands over our heads. We were told this would protect us in the event of a nuclear attack. A duck-and-cover pubic service announcement of the era shows, among other scenarios, an elementary school class much like mine.
  • Pat Arrowsmith Interview After Hiroshima Project 28Th April 2015

    Pat Arrowsmith Interview After Hiroshima Project 28Th April 2015

    Pat Arrowsmith Interview After Hiroshima Project 28th April 2015 Interviewee: Pat Arrowsmith (PA) born 02.03.1930 Interviewer(s): Katie Nairne & Ruth Dewa (Interviewer) (0.00) Interviewer: Um so my name is Katie Nairne, N-A-I-R-N-E, um and I'm interviewing, er could you say your name for the tape please? PA: Pat Arrowsmith. Interviewer: How's that spelt? PA: Well, Pat is P-A-T, it's not short for Patricia, I was christened Pat by two bishops, one of whom arrived late for the event, and Arrowsmith as, most inappropriate for a peace activist, 'arrow' as the arrows that you shoot, and 'smith' - all the same word, Arrowsmith. Interviewer: Thank you. And please could I get you to say your date of birth for the tape? PA: 2nd March, 1930. Interviewer: Thank you. Um and I'm interviewing Pat for the After Hiroshima Project, er for London Bubble Theatre Company. Um so Pat, just to start in 1945, um what are your memories of the Second World War? PA: Um I don't have any (1.00) very grisly memories, my father was a vicar who travelled around doing dif, different parishes, and happenstance in 1939 when World War Two broke out he was scheduled to go to Torquay anyway, so we moved from where we had been living er further up the coast at Weston-super-Mare to Torquay, in time to arrive there for the outbreak of er, fairly soon after we got there, World War Two, which er was er... Oh well no wait a moment, we got there in 1939, ‘40.