DOCSLIB.ORG

Is Nuclear Power History? the Dream Evaporates

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Is Nuclear Power History? the Dream Evaporates GENERATION Is nuclear power history? The dream evaporates... by CM Meyer, technical journalist This is the 15th in a series of articles being published in Energize tracing the history of nuclear power throughout the world. “It was truly a case of life imitating art. has since been explained, much of the anti- those arguing that pressurised water reactors Last month, amid a burst of publicity, nuclear feeling in the USA can be ascribed to (the competing V VER design) were more Columbia Pictures released, in the United something not easily explained; an incredible dangerous, and strengthened the Soviet States its film "The China Syndrome. coincidence that a fictional movie about a commitment to continuing and modernizing The fictional tale deals with the near melt- nuclear accident was released just before a the RBMK [3; 239]. real nuclear accident happened. down of a nuclear reactor. Then last week it The Three Mile Island incident was basically almost happened in real life.”[10; 20] Three Mile Island; what happened? caused by a faulty valve. At about 04h00 on In actual fact, the Three Mile Island accident 28 March 1979, the main feedwater pumps of “In the two decades since Three Mile island, of 28 March 1979 was a real meltdown, the non-nuclear section of the plant stopped the plant has become a rallying symbol resulting in more than half of the reactor’s running, because of either a mechanical or for the anti-nuclear movement. But the core being permanently damaged. But electrical failure. This prevented the steam nuclear power industry, which has not built many people living near the damaged generators from removing heat. First the a single new plant in the United States since turbine, then the reactor automatically reactor in Pennsylvania were preoccupied 1979, says the incident shows that its safety shut down. Immediately, pressure in the with something much worse, an enormous systems worked, even in the most extreme primary system, that is, the nuclear part of cloud of radioactive fallout the size of circumstances” [13; 1]. the plant, started to increase, and a relief Pennsylvania that would soon be permanently valve opened to allow pressure to reach a uninhabitable [14; 3] [15; 1]. On 30 March When compared with Chernobyl, where lower level. So far, there wasn’t a problem, 1979, nearly 200 000 people fled their nearly 20-million curies of radioactive and all equipment functioned as originally homes, some for several weeks [12; 1]. materials and several million curies of inert designed until the relief valve failed to close, radioactive gases were released [3; 45], What happened and why? On 19 March, and signals available to the operator failed the actual radioactivity release by the Three 1979, the film “The China Syndrome” was to show that the valve was still open. The rest Mile Island (TMI) accident was miniscule. released for the movie-going public by is basically history. More and more coolant Approximately 43 000 curies of radioactive Columbia Pictures. The film dealt with a water continued to drain from the reactor, krypton was vented from the reactor more fictional near melt-down in a nuclear reactor. slowly exposing the core and leading to a than a year later in preparation for cleanup The title came from the idea that, “if an meltdown in which about one half of the crews to enter the reactor building [11; 4] American nuclear plant melts down, it will core melted. [12; 1]. This came after a significant release melt through the Earth until it reaches China” of radiation from the plant’s auxiliary building, Because of badly planned instrumentation, [14; 1]. Although intended as a joke, some performed to relieve pressure on the primary a crucial error was missed as no instrument viewers might well have believed this really system and avoid curtailing the flow of showed the level of coolant in the core, and would happen. But then came the actual coolant to the core on 30 March 1979. In the inadequately trained operators failed Three Mile Island accident. Nine days and simpler language, steam from the leaking to realise that the plant was experiencing more after the release of the movie, tens pilot-operated relief valve over-pressurised a a loss-of-cooling accident. The operators of millions of Americans could turn off the tank in the auxiliary building, and a bursting misunderstood what was happening, and evening news, walk down the street to the disc released it automatically into the turned off the emergency core cooling movie theatre and see a film version of what building. system. But, even though the plant suffered they had been watching on television all a severe core meltdown - the most week. [15; 1] And, not surprisingly, many got This release of radiation resulted in an average dangerous kind of nuclear power accident, confused between the conflicting accounts dose to about 2-million people in the area of the containment vessel held and virtually no of what they were seeing in the news with about 1 millirem, less than that for a full set of radioactivity was released. Unlike Chernobyl, the fictional explanations of the film. Small chest x-rays (about 6 millirem). The maximum there was no actual explosion, by steam wonder then that, when the Governor Dick dose to someone at the site boundary would or otherwise. A major concern in a core- Thornborough advised an estimated 3 500 have been less than what one would have meltdown scenario is that the core will melt pregnant women and children living within received from natural background radiation through the pressure vessel and start to attack five miles of the plant to evacuate the area, in the area during a year, about 100 to the concrete container. This did not begin to many more people responded with alacrity. 125 millirem per year [11; 2 – 3]. Ironically, happen. Two results of the accident were that Not surprisingly, the enthusiasm the American there was a link to Chernobyl. Soviet nuclear Generation II reactors (the type then in use) public had for nuclear power dropped energy planners studied the incident, but and practices were modified to make them considerably after the Three Mile Island sincerely believed that the RBMK design was much safer, while Generation III reactors accident. While what actually happened actually safer. The TMI incident actually served (e.g. the EPR and AP 1000, contenders for energize - April 2008 - Page 44 GENERATION Eskom’s nuclear programme) must be able and with it went Harwell’s livelihood. The USA Hinton’s words, written in 1958 during the to accommodate core meltdown. took much the same decision when it shut heyday of nuclear power now have an ironic down the integral fast reactor program in ring to them: “British supplies of coal are While a large hydrogen bubble was found 1994, at a time when the price of oil was little running short. All of our oil is imported. From in the core, the absence of oxygen in the more than $10 per barrel. Like the American the outset we realized that we would need pressure vessel meant that it could not decision, the British decision has proved nuclear power and need it soon.” [6; 35]. explode. Plant operators later managed to to be equally short-sighted. After 1992, greatly reduce the bubble’s size [11; 1-2]. Chernobyl: the hidden conflict the British North Sea oilfield had practically But, unlike the hydrogen bubble, public fear been exhausted. Once again, a means of “If it had not been for the atomic bomb, exploded. While steps were taken to correct using nuclear reactors as a source of electric sustainably using energy was obliterated by the instrumentation and improve training of energy would probably still be in the research the short-term lure of fossil fuels. The ironic operators, all further nuclear plants in the US stage. The technology is far too expensive difference is that this time it was not solar were put on hold. Exhaustive public hearings, for civilian use alone” [3; 226] power or wind power that was affected, but delays, and consequent huge increases in the best and most promising means of using If you mention the word “Chernobyl”, many will costs were now associated with all plans nuclear power economically. automatically associate it with the ill-starred for nuclear power plants, and after the Chernobyl disaster, any positive sentiments for nuclear power seemed to have disappeared forever. In the United Kingdom, Chernobyl came after an even bigger blow to nuclear power; the discovery of oil in the nearby North Sea. Harwell versus North Sea Oil “In that same year (1969) oil and gas deposits were discovered off the Norwegian coast and in 1975 in UK waters. By 1981, the UK had become a net exporter of oil and with energy costs falling to an all time low, the nuclear power dream evaporated.” [2; 116] When Calder Hall, the first British nuclear power station opened on 17 October 1956, [6;29], nuclear power was seen as the solution to the United Kingdom’s energy problems. In 1956, the UK government White Paper planned for twelve nuclear power stations, totalling 2000 MW, to produce electricity at a price cheaper than burning oil [2; 107]. After the Suez crisis of late 1956 this target was revised to 6 000 MW (halved two years later) and the golden age of nuclear power had seemingly arrived [2; 108]. In the 1980s the British government began to cut back on funding for nuclear research. For the first time ever, some researchers at Harwell, the world-renowned atomic energy research establishment that had virtually developed British nuclear power technology from scratch, faced the grim prospect of redundancy.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Reel Impact: Movies and TV at Changed History
    Reel Impact: Movies and TV Õat Changed History - "Õe China Syndrome" Screenwriters and lmmakers often impact society in ways never expected. Frank Deese explores the "The China Syndrome" - the lm that launched Hollywood's social activism - and the eect the lm had on the world's view of nuclear power plants. FRANK DEESE · SEP 24, 2020 Click to tweet this article to your friends and followers! As screenwriters, our work has the capability to reach millions, if not billions - and sometimes what we do actually shifts public opinion, shapes the decision-making of powerful leaders, perpetuates destructive myths, or unexpectedly enlightens the culture. It isn’t always “just entertainment.” Sometimes it’s history. Leo Szilard was irritated. Reading the newspaper in a London hotel on September 12, 1933, the great Hungarian physicist came across an article about a science conference he had not been invited to. Even more irritating was a section about Lord Ernest Rutherford – who famously fathered the “solar system” model of the atom – and his speech where he self-assuredly pronounced: “Anyone who expects a source of power from the transformation of these atoms is talking moonshine.” Stewing over the upper-class British arrogance, Szilard set o on a walk and set his mind to how Rutherford could be proven wrong – how energy might usefully be extracted from the atom. As he crossed the street at Southampton Row near the British Museum, he imagined that if a neutron particle were red at a heavy atomic nucleus, it would render the nucleus unstable, split it apart, release a lot of energy along with more neutrons shooting out to split more atomic nuclei releasing more and more energy and..
    [Show full text]
  • University of Cincinnati
    ! "# $ % & % ' % !" #$ !% !' &$ &""! '() ' #$ *+ ' "# ' '% $$(' ,) * !$- .*./- 0 #!1- 2 *,*- Atomic Apocalypse – ‘Nuclear Fiction’ in German Literature and Culture A dissertation submitted to the Graduate School of the University of Cincinnati In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTORATE OF PHILOSOPHY (Ph.D.) in the Department of German Studies of the College of Arts and Sciences 2010 by Wolfgang Lueckel B.A. (equivalent) in German Literature, Universität Mainz, 2003 M.A. in German Studies, University of Cincinnati, 2005 Committee Chair: Sara Friedrichsmeyer, Ph.D. Committee Members: Todd Herzog, Ph.D. (second reader) Katharina Gerstenberger, Ph.D. Richard E. Schade, Ph.D. ii Abstract In my dissertation “Atomic Apocalypse – ‘Nuclear Fiction’ in German Literature and Culture,” I investigate the portrayal of the nuclear age and its most dreaded fantasy, the nuclear apocalypse, in German fictionalizations and cultural writings. My selection contains texts of disparate natures and provenance: about fifty plays, novels, audio plays, treatises, narratives, films from 1946 to 2009. I regard these texts as a genre of their own and attempt a description of the various elements that tie them together. The fascination with the end of the world that high and popular culture have developed after 9/11 partially originated from the tradition of nuclear fiction since 1945. The Cold War has produced strong and lasting apocalyptic images in German culture that reject the traditional biblical apocalypse and that draw up a new worldview. In particular, German nuclear fiction sees the atomic apocalypse as another step towards the technical facilitation of genocide, preceded by the Jewish Holocaust with its gas chambers and ovens.
    [Show full text]
  • Significant Incidents in Nuclear Fuel Cycle Facilities
    IAEA-TECDOC-867 Significant incidents in nuclear fuel cycle INTERNATIONAL ATOMIC ENERGY AGENCY The IAEA does not normally maintain stocks of reports in this series. However, microfiche copie f thesso e reportobtainee b n sca d from INIS Clearinghouse International Atomic Energy Agency Wagramerstrasse 5 P.O. Box 100 A-1400 Vienna, Austria Orders should be accompanied by prepayment of Austrian Schillings 100, in the form of a cheque or in the form of IAEA microfiche service coupons which may be ordered separately from the INIS Clearinghouse. The originating Section of this publication in the IAEA was: Nuclear Fuel Cycle and Materials Section International Atomic Energy aoiicy A Wagramerstrasse 5 0 10 P.Ox Bo . A-1400 Vienna, Austria SIGNIFICANT INCIDENT NUCLEASN I R FUEL CYCLE FACILITIES IAEA, VIENNA, 1996 IAEA-TECDOC-867 ISSN 1011-4289 ©IAEA, 1996 Printe IAEe th AustriAn y i d b a March 1996 FOREWORD significano Tw t accidents have occurre histore th n di f nuclea yo r power, namely t Threa , e Mile Islan Chernobyld dan orden I . preveno rt t such accidents, causes were investigate actiond dan s were taken r exampleFo . , reporting systems were establishe accumulato dt disseminatd ean e information on accidents such as INES (International Nuclear Event Scale) and IRS (Incident Reporting System). Operators of nuclear power plants also established an information system to share incident information. The purpose of INES is to facilitate prompt communication between the nuclear community, the media and the public. The purpose of IRS is to analyse causes of significant incidents. Those systems serve to promote safety culture in nuclear power plants.
    [Show full text]
  • It's Not Just a Story Any More
    (reprinted with permission from The Guardian, 4 August 1979) It's not just a story any more The phrase 'China syndrome' describes what happens if a nuclear plant backfires. Walt Patterson casts a professional eye over the film of that name and finds it alarmingly accurate. At the end of The China Syndrome, if the house lights don't come up too soon, you may notice an inconspicuous line far down the credits. After Best Boy Grip and Paint Foreman comes Technical Advisers [Nuclear] … MHB Technical Associates. Nowhere else in the publicity pack from Columbia Pictures is there any further reference to the specific technical content of the film, or to the technical advisers responsible. The coyness is curious, but understandable. In The China Syndrome the technical content is of a very different order to that, say, in Moonraker. In Moonraker the technical content is there essentially to astonish; its genuine credibility is irrelevant. In The China Syndrome, on the contrary, the technical content is central to the plot – and is moreover acutely controversial. It is not now, mark you, as controversial as it was before March 28 this year. The China Syndrome, of course, is about – among other things – the threat of an accident at a nuclear power station. The accident at the Three Mile Island nuclear power station near Harrisburg, which occurred about a month after the release of the film, was a classical if unnerving example of life imitating art. When the film was released the nuclear industry was still talking about hypothetical accidents at nuclear stations.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 the Politics of Independence: the China Syndrome (1979)
    1 The Politics of Independence: The China Syndrome (1979), Hollywood Liberals and Antinuclear Campaigning Peter Krämer, University of East Anglia Abstract: This article draws, among other things, on press clippings files and scripts found in various archives to reconstruct the complex production history, the marketing and the critical reception of the nuclear thriller The China Syndrome (1979). It shows that with this project, several politically motivated filmmakers, most notably Jane Fonda, who starred in the film and whose company IPC Films produced it, managed to inject their antinuclear stance into Hollywood entertainment. Helped by the accident at the Three Mile Island nuclear power plant two weeks into the film’s release, The China Syndrome gained a high profile in public debates about nuclear energy in the U.S. Jane Fonda, together with her then husband Tom Hayden, a founding member of the 1960s “New Left” who had entered mainstream politics in the California Democratic Party by the late 1970s, complemented her involvement in the film with activities aimed at grass roots mobilisation against nuclear power. If the 1979 Columbia release The China Syndrome (James Bridges, 1979) is remembered today, it is mainly because of an astonishing coincidence. This thriller about an almost catastrophic accident at a nuclear power plant was released just twelve days before eerily similar events began to unfold at the Three Mile Island nuclear power plant near Harrisburg in Pennsylvania on 28 March 1979, resulting in, as the cover of J. Samuel Walker’s authoritative account of the event calls it, “the worst accident in the history of commercial nuclear power in the United States” (Walker).
    [Show full text]
  • China's Dilemma
    CHINA’S DILEMMA i ii CHINA’S DILEMMA ECONOMIC GROWTH, THE ENVIRONMENT AND CLIMATE CHANGE Ligang Song and Wing Thye Woo (eds) Asia Pacific Press Brookings Institution Press SOCIAL SCIENCES ACADEMIC PRESS (CHINA) iii Co-published by ANU E Press and Asia Pacific Press The Australian National University Canberra ACT 0200 Australia Email: [email protected] This title available online at http://epress.anu.edu.au/china_dilemma_citation.html © 2008 ANU E Press, Asia Pacific Press, Brookings Institution Press and Social Sciences Academic Press (China) This work is copyright. Apart from those uses which may be permitted under the Copyright Act 1968 as amended, no part may be reproduced by any process without written permission from the publisher. Co-published with SOCIAL SCIENCES ACADEMIC PRESS (CHINA) C H I N A B O O K under the China Book International scheme. This scheme supports INTERNATIONAL co-publication of works with international publishers. National Library of Australia Cataloguing-in-Publication entry Title: China’s dilemma : economic growth, the environment and climate change / editors Ligang Song ; Wing Thye Woo. ISBN: 9780731538195 (pbk.) 9781921536038 (pdf.) Notes: Includes index. Bibliography. Subjects: Economic development--Environmental aspects--China. Climatic changes--China. Energy consumption--China. China--Economic conditions. China--Environmental conditions. Other Authors/Contributors: Song, Ligang. Woo, Wing Thye. Dewey Number: 338.900951 Cover design: Teresa Prowse Cover photo: Jason Lyon. iStockphoto, File Number: 2831996
    [Show full text]
  • The Inventory of the Michael Douglas Collection #1839
    The Inventory of the Michael Douglas Collection #1839 Howard Gotlieb Archival Research Center Douglas, Michael #1839 3/31/16, 4/7/16 Preliminary Listing I. Wardrobe. A. Costumes. Box 1-2 1. “The American President.” Box 3-8 2. “Behind the Candelabra.” Box 9 3. “Disclosure.” 4. “A Perfect Murder.” 5. “Romancing The Stone.” Box 9-14 6. “The Game.” Box 15-20 7. “The In-Laws.” Box 21-25 8. “It Runs In The Family.” Box 26 9. “Jewel Of The Nile.” Box 27-32 10. “Traffic.” Box 33-37 11. “Wonder Boys.” Box 38 12. “Wall Street.” B. Hanging Costumes. Pkg. 1-2 1. “The American President.” Pkg. 3-35 2. “Behind the Candelabra.” Pkg. 36-57 3. “The Game.” Pkg. 58-78 4. “The In-Laws.” Pkg. 79-116 5. “It Runs In The Family.” Pkg. 117 6. “Wall Street.” Box 39-56 C. Personal. Pkg. 118-124 D. Hanging Personal. II. Printed Materials. A. Files. Box 57-88 1. Clippings (not on their spreadsheets). Box 88 2. General. B. Blueprints/Maps. C. Internet printouts. D. Postcards. Box 89-91 E. Magazines. Box 92-94 F. Programs. Box 95 G. Newspapers. Box 95-96 H. Reviews. Box 96 I. Clippings. J. Booklets. K. Pamphlets. L. Fliers. Box 97 M. Posters. Pkg. 125-141 N. Oversized posters. Douglas, Michael (3/31/16, 4/7/16) Page 1 of 46 III. Film and Video. Box 98-131 A. VHS. Box 131 B. 8 mm cassettes. C. Mini-DVs. Box 132 D. DV-Cams. Box 133 E. DVDs. Box 134 F.
    [Show full text]
  • Compare and Contrast Major Nuclear Power Plant Disasters: Lessons Learned from the Past
    163 10th International Conference of the International Institute for Infrastructure Resilience and Reconstruction (I3R2) 20–22 May 2014 Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, USA Compare and Contrast Major Nuclear Power Plant Disasters: Lessons Learned from the Past Sayanti Mukhopadhyay and Makarand Hastak Construction Engineering and Management, Purdue University Jessica Halligan School of Nuclear Engineering, Purdue University ABSTRACT The construction of nuclear power plants is a major step towards reducing greenhouse gas emissions compared to the conventional coal-fired or oil-fired power plants. However, some of the major nuclear accidents in the past have raised questions about the safety and reliability of nuclear power plants. This paper compares and contrasts the major nuclear accidents of the past for example, the Chernobyl disaster (USSR), the Fukushima Daiichi disaster (Japan), and the Three Mile Island incident (USA). Although each of the accidents was unique, a thorough comparison found some common issues, such as faulty design of reactors and safety systems, safety rules violations, and lack of trained operators. The primary impacts mostly involved radiation hazards such as exposure to varying doses of radiation, uninhabitable neighborhoods and health problems; the levels of impact varied mostly due to different intensities of warnings and precautionary measures taken by the local governments. The research findings would serve as an important resource for the nuclear professionals to plan proper precautionary measures in order to avoid the major issues that initiated or resulted from the accidents in the past. 1. INTRODUCTION summarizes the important lessons learned from the past instances which could serve as an Nuclear power plants are one of the most complex information tool for the nuclear professionals to and sophisticated energy systems designed to plan for proper preventive measures well in produce low carbon electrical energy in contrast to advance to avoid similar accidents in future.
    [Show full text]
  • American Auteur Cinema: the Last – Or First – Great Picture Show 37 Thomas Elsaesser
    For many lovers of film, American cinema of the late 1960s and early 1970s – dubbed the New Hollywood – has remained a Golden Age. AND KING HORWATH PICTURE SHOW ELSAESSER, AMERICAN GREAT THE LAST As the old studio system gave way to a new gen- FILMFILM FFILMILM eration of American auteurs, directors such as Monte Hellman, Peter Bogdanovich, Bob Rafel- CULTURE CULTURE son, Martin Scorsese, but also Robert Altman, IN TRANSITION IN TRANSITION James Toback, Terrence Malick and Barbara Loden helped create an independent cinema that gave America a different voice in the world and a dif- ferent vision to itself. The protests against the Vietnam War, the Civil Rights movement and feminism saw the emergence of an entirely dif- ferent political culture, reflected in movies that may not always have been successful with the mass public, but were soon recognized as audacious, creative and off-beat by the critics. Many of the films TheThe have subsequently become classics. The Last Great Picture Show brings together essays by scholars and writers who chart the changing evaluations of this American cinema of the 1970s, some- LaLastst Great Great times referred to as the decade of the lost generation, but now more and more also recognised as the first of several ‘New Hollywoods’, without which the cin- American ema of Francis Coppola, Steven Spiel- American berg, Robert Zemeckis, Tim Burton or Quentin Tarantino could not have come into being. PPictureicture NEWNEW HOLLYWOODHOLLYWOOD ISBN 90-5356-631-7 CINEMACINEMA ININ ShowShow EDITEDEDITED BY BY THETHE
    [Show full text]
  • The Guardian, April 3, 1979
    Wright State University CORE Scholar The Guardian Student Newspaper Student Activities 4-3-1979 The Guardian, April 3, 1979 Wright State University Student Body Follow this and additional works at: https://corescholar.libraries.wright.edu/guardian Part of the Mass Communication Commons Repository Citation Wright State University Student Body (1979). The Guardian, April 3, 1979. : Wright State University. This Newspaper is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Activities at CORE Scholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in The Guardian Student Newspaper by an authorized administrator of CORE Scholar. For more information, please contact [email protected]. weather thought Strong easterly winds will briog radiation from Harrisburg. Penn- No one was sylvania to the Dayton area. Scientists warn people to not drink milk, ro eipect an increase thinking today. in birth defects and a lack of hair, FALL-OUT and death. The Daily Gardenia If it happened today, it's news to us April Kplus 2), 1979 issue forth ' Vol. ^Aqt. Dayton, Ohio Rain keeps WSU open Bv CHUCK STEVENS UNIVERSITY President Robert simply don't have the equipment Gardenia Managing Editor Kegerreis was vacationing on his for removing mass amounts of Executive Director of Campus yacht and was unavailable for tain," he said. He went on 10 note Planning and Operations Robert comment. that it would have been better to Francis recommended that Assistant Director of Security close school during the duration Wright State remain open today Carl Sims and Assistant Director of the storm and then "long despite the heavy rainstorm hov- of Parking Eddie Cooper told the enough for the ground to absorb ering over the area.
    [Show full text]
  • The Nuclear Accident at Chernobyl: Immediate and Further Consequences
    The article was received on September 10, 2020, and accepted for publishing on February 13, 2021. VARIA The nuclear accident at Chernobyl: Immediate and further consequences Symeon Naoum1, Vasileios Spyropoulos1 Abstract: The accident at Chernobyl occurred in April 1986 at the Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant in Soviet Union. The incident occurred during a scheduled safety test. A combination of inherent reactor design flaws and operators’ mistakes resulted in reactor’s No.4 disaster and the emission of a large quantity of radiation. The immediate actions involved the fire extinguishing, the cleanup of radioactive residues and the prevention of a new explosion. For this purpose, plenty of people worked with self-sacrifice. The people who lived nearby were removed. As far as the socio-economic impact for the Soviet Union is concerned, it was quite serious. Moreover, the environmental and human health consequences were also alarming with thyroid cancer being the most studied. Useful conclusions, especially for the safety both of reactors and nuclear power, as well as for the impact of radiation at ecosystems have been drawn. The debate about the use of nuclear power has remained open ever since. Keywords: nuclear power, thyroid cancer, RBMK reactor, radiation, radioactivity, liquidators INTRODUCTION while 28 firemen and employees finally died. The Chernobyl The Chernobyl nuclear accident occurred on 26 April 1986 in accident is considered the most damaging nuclear power the light water graphite moderated reactor No 4 at the plant accident in history. The Chernobyl and the Fukushima Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant, close the town of Pripyat, in accident are the two nuclear accidents classified as a level 7 Ukrainian Soviet Socialist Republic Soviet Union, roughly (the maximum classification) on the International Nuclear 100km of the city of Kiev [1].
    [Show full text]
  • Antinuclear Politics, Atomic Culture, and Reagan Era Foreign Policy
    Selling the Second Cold War: Antinuclear Cultural Activism and Reagan Era Foreign Policy A dissertation presented to the faculty of the College of Arts and Sciences of Ohio University In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy William M. Knoblauch March 2012 © 2012 William M. Knoblauch. All Rights Reserved. 2 This dissertation titled Selling the Second Cold War: Antinuclear Cultural Activism and Reagan Era Foreign Policy by WILLIAM M. KNOBLAUCH has been approved for the Department of History and the College of Arts and Sciences by __________________________________ Chester J. Pach Associate Professor of History __________________________________ Howard Dewald Dean, College of Arts and Sciences 3 ABSTRACT KNOBLAUCH, WILLIAM M., Ph.D., March 2012, History Selling the Second Cold War: Antinuclear Cultural Activism and Reagan Era Foreign Policy Director of Dissertation: Chester J. Pach This dissertation examines how 1980s antinuclear activists utilized popular culture to criticize the Reagan administration’s arms buildup. The 1970s and the era of détente marked a decade-long nadir for American antinuclear activism. Ronald Reagan’s rise to the presidency in 1981 helped to usher in the “Second Cold War,” a period of reignited Cold War animosities that rekindled atomic anxiety. As the arms race escalated, antinuclear activism surged. Alongside grassroots movements, such as the nuclear freeze campaign, a unique group of antinuclear activists—including publishers, authors, directors, musicians, scientists, and celebrities—challenged Reagan’s military buildup in American mass media and popular culture. These activists included Fate of the Earth author Jonathan Schell, Day After director Nicholas Meyer, and “nuclear winter” scientific-spokesperson Carl Sagan.
    [Show full text]