DOCSLIB.ORG

Biodiversity Inclusive Environmental Impact Assessment (B-EIA)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Biodiversity Inclusive Environmental Impact Assessment (B-EIA) Biodiversity Inclusive Environmental Impact Assessment (B-EIA) & Participatory Social Impact Assessment (p-SIA) Belize Aquaculture Ltd, Blair Athol, Stann Creek District Belize Meerman, Arevalo & Boomsma, November 2014 Belize Aquaculture Ltd. B-EAI & p-SIA. November 2014 Page 1 Contents 1 Executive Summary ............................................................................................................................... 6 1.1. Resumen Ejecutivo ............................................................................................................................. 7 2 Introduction to the Biodiversity-inclusive Environmental Impact Assessment .................................... 9 3 Introduction to the participatory Social Impact Assessment ............................................................... 9 4 Methodology ....................................................................................................................................... 10 5 Description of the BAL Shrimp Farm ................................................................................................... 14 6 B-EIA components ............................................................................................................................... 17 6.1. Siting in Protected Areas .................................................................................................................. 17 6.2. Siting in Mangrove Ecosystems........................................................................................................ 18 6.3. Siting in Critical Habitats .................................................................................................................. 21 6.4. Endangered species ......................................................................................................................... 24 6.4.1. Actions....................................................................................................................................... 26 6.5. Biological Corridors .......................................................................................................................... 26 6.5.1. Actions....................................................................................................................................... 30 6.6. Salt Water Intrusion ......................................................................................................................... 31 6.6.1. Actions....................................................................................................................................... 34 6.7. Predator Control .............................................................................................................................. 35 6.7.1. Actions....................................................................................................................................... 38 6.8. Introduction of non-native species .................................................................................................. 40 6.8.1. Flood Risk as a result of hurricanes........................................................................................... 40 6.8.2. Regular flooding ........................................................................................................................ 42 6.8.3. Escapes via waterways .............................................................................................................. 44 6.8.4. Actions....................................................................................................................................... 44 7 Identification of a Governmental Entity ............................................................................................. 46 8 Identification of a civil society organization ....................................................................................... 46 9 Identification of the BAL Shrimp Farm stakeholders .......................................................................... 46 9.1. Nearby villages: Santa Cruz, Placencia village and Seine Bight ........................................................ 48 9.1.1. Santa Cruz (Stann Creek district) .............................................................................................. 49 9.1.2. Santa Cruz: Positive impacts: .................................................................................................... 50 9.1.3. Santa Cruz: Negative effects: .................................................................................................... 51 Belize Aquaculture Ltd. B-EAI & p-SIA. November 2014 Page 2 9.1.4. Santa Cruz: impactos positivos ................................................................................................. 52 9.1.5. Santa Cruz: impactos negativos: ............................................................................................... 52 9.1.6. Placencia Village and Seine Bight .............................................................................................. 55 9.1.7. Placencia and Seine Bight: Negative effects: ............................................................................ 56 9.2. Neighbouring Land Owners ............................................................................................................. 58 9.3. Users of the same natural resources ............................................................................................... 59 9.4. Non-Governmental Organization: Southern Environmental Association ........................................ 60 9.5. Department of Rural Development ................................................................................................. 60 9.6. National Integrated Water Resources Authority ............................................................................. 60 9.7. Department of Environment ............................................................................................................ 60 9.8. Social Investment Fund .................................................................................................................... 61 10 Deeper research needed on important impacts on the physical, biological and social environment 62 11 Proposed adaptations at farm set-up ............................................................................................. 65 11.1. Maximize positive impacts: ............................................................................................................ 65 11.1.1. Employment: ........................................................................................................................... 65 11.1.2. Contributions to local communities, organizations, private persons: .................................... 65 11.1.3. Website BSGA ......................................................................................................................... 65 11.2. Minimize the negative impacts: ..................................................................................................... 66 11.2.1. Water quality monitoring ....................................................................................................... 66 11.2.2. BAL’s grievance procedure...................................................................................................... 66 11.2.3. Future developments at the BAL farm:................................................................................... 66 11.2.4. Website BSGA ......................................................................................................................... 66 12 Conflict Resolution Policy BAL ........................................................................................................ 67 13 Agree on impacts and measures to address them ......................................................................... 67 14 Conclusions and agreements .......................................................................................................... 68 15 Appendices ...................................................................................................................................... 70 15.1. Appendix 1: Transcript first meeting consultant and management BAL ....................................... 70 15.2. Appendix 2a: Transcript meetings with Santa Cruz Village stakeholders ...................................... 72 15.3. Appendix 2b: Transcript meetings with Placencia Village stakeholders ........................................ 79 15.4. Appendix 2c: Transcript meetings with Seine Bight stakeholders ................................................. 89 15.5. Appendix 3: Consultation neighbouring landowners .................................................................... 97 Belize Aquaculture Ltd. B-EAI & p-SIA. November 2014 Page 3 15.6. Appendix 4: Consultations with the Department of the Environment .......................................... 99 15.7. Appendix 5: Consultation with Ministry of Labour, Local Government, Rural Development, NEMO and Immigration. ....................................................................................................................... 101 15.8. Appendix 6. Consultation with Social Investment Fund .............................................................. 101 15.9. Appendix 7. Consultation with the National Integrated Water Resources Agency. .................... 101 15.10. Appendix 8. Escape Recovery Plan ...........................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Social Reorganization and Household Adaptation in the Aftermath of Collapse at Baking Pot, Belize
    SOCIAL REORGANIZATION AND HOUSEHOLD ADAPTATION IN THE AFTERMATH OF COLLAPSE AT BAKING POT, BELIZE by Julie A. Hoggarth B.A. in Anthropology (Archaeology), University of California, San Diego, 2004 B.A. in Latin American Studies, University of California, San Diego, 2004 Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Kenneth P. Dietrich School of Arts and Sciences in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy University of Pittsburgh 2012 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH KENNETH P. DIETRICH SCHOOL OF ARTS AND SCIENCES This dissertation was presented by Julie A. Hoggarth It was defended on November 14, 2012 and approved by: Dr. Olivier de Montmollin (Chair), Associate Professor, Anthropology Department Dr. Marc P. Bermann, Associate Professor, Anthropology Department Dr. Robert D. Drennan, Distinguished Professor, Anthropology Department Dr. Lara Putnam, Associate Professor, History Department ii Copyright © by Julie A. Hoggarth 2012 iii SOCIAL REORGANIZATION AND HOUSEHOLD ADAPTATION IN THE AFTERMATH OF COLLAPSE AT BAKING POT, BELIZE Julie A. Hoggarth, PhD University of Pittsburgh, 2012 This dissertation focuses on the adaptations of ancient Maya households to the processes of social reorganization in the aftermath of collapse of Classic Maya rulership at Baking Pot, a small kingdom in the upper Belize River Valley of western Belize. With the depopulation of the central and southern Maya lowlands at the end of the Late Classic period, residents in Settlement Cluster C at Baking Pot persisted following the abandonment of the palace complex in the Terminal Classic period (A.D. 800-900). Results from this study indicate that noble and commoner households in Settlement Cluster C continued to live at Baking Pot, developing strategies of adaptation including expanding interregional mercantile exchange and hosting community feasts in the Terminal Classic and Early Postclassic periods.
    [Show full text]
  • Biosecurity Amendment (Schedules to Act) Regulation 2017 Under the Biosecurity Act 2015
    New South Wales Biosecurity Amendment (Schedules to Act) Regulation 2017 under the Biosecurity Act 2015 His Excellency the Governor, with the advice of the Executive Council, has made the following Regulation under the Biosecurity Act 2015. NIALL BLAIR, MLC Minister for Primary Industries Explanatory note The objects of this Regulation are: (a) to update the lists of pests and diseases of plants, pests and diseases of animals, diseases of aquatic animals, pest marine and freshwater finfish and pest marine invertebrates (set out in Part 1 of Schedule 2 to the Biosecurity Act 2015 (the Act)) that are prohibited matter throughout the State, and (b) to update the description (set out in Part 2 of Schedule 2 to the Act) of the part of the State in which Daktulosphaira vitifoliae (Grapevine phylloxera) is a prohibited matter, and (c) to include (in Schedule 3 to the Act) lists of non-indigenous amphibians, birds, mammals and reptiles in respect of which dealings are prohibited or permitted, and (d) to provide (in Schedule 4 to the Act) that certain dealings with bees and certain non-indigenous animals require biosecurity registration, and (e) to update savings and transitional provisions with respect to existing licences (in Schedule 7 to the Act). This Regulation is made under the Biosecurity Act 2015, including sections 27 (4), 151 (2), 153 (2) and 404 (the general regulation-making power) and clause 1 (1) and (5) of Schedule 7. Published LW 2 June 2017 (2017 No 230) Biosecurity Amendment (Schedules to Act) Regulation 2017 [NSW] Biosecurity Amendment (Schedules to Act) Regulation 2017 under the Biosecurity Act 2015 1 Name of Regulation This Regulation is the Biosecurity Amendment (Schedules to Act) Regulation 2017.
    [Show full text]
  • Biosecurity Risk Assessment
    An Invasive Risk Assessment Framework for New Animal and Plant-based Production Industries RIRDC Publication No. 11/141 RIRDCInnovation for rural Australia An Invasive Risk Assessment Framework for New Animal and Plant-based Production Industries by Dr Robert C Keogh February 2012 RIRDC Publication No. 11/141 RIRDC Project No. PRJ-007347 © 2012 Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation. All rights reserved. ISBN 978-1-74254-320-8 ISSN 1440-6845 An Invasive Risk Assessment Framework for New Animal and Plant-based Production Industries Publication No. 11/141 Project No. PRJ-007347 The information contained in this publication is intended for general use to assist public knowledge and discussion and to help improve the development of sustainable regions. You must not rely on any information contained in this publication without taking specialist advice relevant to your particular circumstances. While reasonable care has been taken in preparing this publication to ensure that information is true and correct, the Commonwealth of Australia gives no assurance as to the accuracy of any information in this publication. The Commonwealth of Australia, the Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation (RIRDC), the authors or contributors expressly disclaim, to the maximum extent permitted by law, all responsibility and liability to any person, arising directly or indirectly from any act or omission, or for any consequences of any such act or omission, made in reliance on the contents of this publication, whether or not caused by any negligence on the part of the Commonwealth of Australia, RIRDC, the authors or contributors. The Commonwealth of Australia does not necessarily endorse the views in this publication.
    [Show full text]
  • Uses, Assessments and Perceptions of Wildlife: Case Study in Loma Bonita, Oaxaca
    dx.doi.org/10.5154/r.rga.2019.63.07 Uses, assessments and perceptions of wildlife: Case study in Loma Bonita, Oaxaca Ma. Teresa Kido Cruz1* Tania Zuñiga Marroquín1 Antonio Kido Cruz2 Abstract Even though there is a valid discourse on environmental protection in our country, few efforts have been made in this area, especially when it comes to wildlife. Part of the reason is due to the lack of information and studies on the subject. The objective of this paper is to contribute to our knowledge about the perception of three groups of wild fauna, namely birds, mammals and reptiles in the lower region of the Papaloapan Basin, held by three different groups of the local population: producers, students and university professors. To do this, we used different data analysis techniques: canonical correlation, use indicators and the cost-benefit method. The results yielded 88 identified species, of which 10 lived in the region in the past but are currently reported as non-existent. The most prominent uses are as food and as pets. Among the species with the highest economic value, the crocodile and parrots stand out. Keywords: Perception, use indicators, birds, reptiles, mammals. Caracterización de la fauna silvestre en Loma Bonita, Oaxaca y su valoración desde la perspectiva local Resumen Aun y cuando el discurso de protección ambiental está vigente en nuestro país, son pocos los esfuerzos que se han realizado en este ámbito, especialmente cuando de fauna silvestre se trata. Parte de la razón obedece a la falta de información y estudios sobre el tema. El presente trabajo tiene como propósito contribuir al conocimiento sobre la percepción de tres grupos de fauna silvestre: aves, mamíferos y reptiles en la región baja de la cuenca del Papaloapan, llevado a cabo por tres diferentes grupos de la población local: productores, estudiantes y profesores universitarios.
    [Show full text]
  • Late Postclassic Zooarchaeology of Lake Mensabak, Chiapas, Mexico
    One Foot Out the Door: Late Postclassic Zooarchaeology of Lake Mensabak, Chiapas, Mexico BY CALEB KESTLE B.S., University of Illinois at Chicago, 2004 M.S., University of Illinois at Chicago, 2006 THESIS Submitted as partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Anthropology in the Graduate College of the University of Illinois at Chicago, 2021 Chicago, Illinois Defense Committee: John D. Monaghan, Chair and Advisor Vincent M. LaMotta Anna C. Roosevelt Donna J. Nash, University of North Carolina, Greensboro Joel Palka, Arizona State University ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Though starting a dissertation with a series of acknowledgments is a standard practice in academia, it seems a fitting introduction for a dissertation that centers the concept of relational ontology. Things exist because of the relationships that undergird their production, and this dissertation is therefore not a product of my labor alone, but also the physical and emotional labor provided by a network of people whom I have been fortunate to find myself amongst. There is no real way to hierarchize this list, nor should there be. Nonetheless, below I have adopted the standard order that dissertations generally follow, moving from the most professional to the most personal. And yet, even this order proves difficult because the two have become largely indistinguishable over the course of my journey. A fact for which I am grateful. I must first acknowledge the members of my committee. My chair, Dr. John Monaghan, who took on this position late. I remain grateful for his doing so, as it is only one of the many ways he has provided necessary material support for me throughout the writing of this dissertation.
    [Show full text]
  • Amphibians and Reptiles
    Chapter 11 Amphibians and Reptiles Pierre Charruau, Jose´ Rogelio Cedeno-Va~ ´zquez, and Gunther Kohler€ Abstract The three Mexican states of the Yucata´n Peninsula have been relatively well explored for herpetofauna, when compared with other states of the country. However, most studies on the herpetofauna of the Yucata´n Peninsula have focused on their diversity, taxonomy, and species distribution, and less on their ecology, behavior or conservation status. The major conservation efforts have focused on sea turtles. Although some conservation programs exist locally for crocodiles in the north of the peninsula, to date conservation strategies have mostly been restricted to the designation of protected areas. With 24 species of amphibians and 118 species of reptiles, the Yucata´n Peninsula harbors 11.5 % of national herpetofauna diver- sity, and 19 % of species are endemic to the peninsula. Reptiles and amphibians are two major globally threatened groups of vertebrates, with amphibians being the most threatened vertebrate class. Both groups face the same threats, namely habitat loss and modification, pollution, overharvest for food and pet trade, introduction of exotic species, infectious diseases, and climatic change. Unfortunately, almost none of these issues have been investigated for key populations in the Yucata´n Peninsula. For amphibians, studies exploring the presence of the chytrid fungus (Batracho- chytrium dendrobatidis) and the effects of climatic change are badly needed to understand the specific factors that negatively affect populations in this area. In general, conservation efforts for reptiles and amphibians in the Yucata´n Peninsula need to include environmental education, scientific investigation, and law enforce- ment and application.
    [Show full text]
  • The Stratigraphic Position of Fossil Vertebrates from the Pojoaque Member of the Tesuque Formation (Middle Miocene, Late Barstovian) Near Española, New Mexico
    Stephen F. Austin State University SFA ScholarWorks Electronic Theses and Dissertations 5-9-2016 THE STRATIGRAPHIC POSITION OF FOSSIL VERTEBRATES FROM THE POJOAQUE MEMBER OF THE TESUQUE FORMATION (MIDDLE MIOCENE, LATE BARSTOVIAN) NEAR ESPAÑOLA, NEW MEXICO Garrett R. Williamson Stephen F. Austin State University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.sfasu.edu/etds Part of the Geochemistry Commons, Geology Commons, Geomorphology Commons, Paleobiology Commons, Paleontology Commons, and the Stratigraphy Commons Tell us how this article helped you. Repository Citation Williamson, Garrett R., "THE STRATIGRAPHIC POSITION OF FOSSIL VERTEBRATES FROM THE POJOAQUE MEMBER OF THE TESUQUE FORMATION (MIDDLE MIOCENE, LATE BARSTOVIAN) NEAR ESPAÑOLA, NEW MEXICO" (2016). Electronic Theses and Dissertations. 41. https://scholarworks.sfasu.edu/etds/41 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by SFA ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of SFA ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE STRATIGRAPHIC POSITION OF FOSSIL VERTEBRATES FROM THE POJOAQUE MEMBER OF THE TESUQUE FORMATION (MIDDLE MIOCENE, LATE BARSTOVIAN) NEAR ESPAÑOLA, NEW MEXICO Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 License. This thesis is available at SFA ScholarWorks: https://scholarworks.sfasu.edu/etds/41 THE STRATIGRAPHIC POSITION OF FOSSIL VERTEBRATES FROM THE POJOAQUE MEMBER OF THE TESUQUE FORMATION (MIDDLE MIOCENE, LATE BARSTOVIAN) NEAR ESPAÑOLA, NEW MEXICO By GARRETT ROSS WILLIAMSON, B.S. Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of Stephen F. Austin State University In Partial Fulfillment Of the Requirements For the Degree of Master of Science STEPHEN F.
    [Show full text]
  • Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology Supplementary
    JOURNAL OF VERTEBRATE PALEONTOLOGY SUPPLEMENTARY DATA Fossil musk turtles (Kinosternidae, Sternotherus) from the late Miocene–early Pliocene (Hemphillian) of Tennessee and Florida JASON R. BOURQUE*, 1 and BLAINE W. SCHUBERT2 1Division of Vertebrate Paleontology, Florida Museum of Natural History, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida 32611, U.S.A., [email protected]; 2Don Sundquist Center of Excellence in Paleontology and Department of Geosciences, East Tennessee State University, Johnson City, Tennessee 37614, U.S.A., [email protected] *Corresponding author TABLES TABLE S1. Updated vertebrate fauna from the Gray Fossil Site. Compiled from Wallace and Wang (2004), Bentley et al. (2008), Hulbert et al. (2009), Boardman and Schubert (2011), Schubert and Mead (2011), Mead et al. (2012). Additional unpublished identifications by S. C. Wallace, J. I. Mead, B.W.S., and J.R.B.. Osteichthyes Centrarchidae Amphibia Anura Ranidae Rana sp. Bufonidae Hylidae Caudata Ambystomatidae Ambystoma sp. Plethodontidae Plethodon sp. Desmognathus sp. Salamandridae Notophthalmus sp. Reptilia Testudines Chelydridae Chelydra sp. Kinosternidae Sternotherus palaeodorus, n. sp. Emydidae Chrysemys sp. Trachemys sp. aff. Emydoidea or Emys sp. Terrapene sp. Testudinidae Hesperotestudo sp. Crocodylia Alligatoridae Alligator sp. Squamata Anguidae Ophisaurinae Scincidae Helodermatidae TABLE 1S. (Continued) Heloderma sp. Colubridae Natricinae Colubrinae Viperidae Aves Anatidae Aix sp. Anas spp. Odontophoridae Rallidae Scolopacidae Scolopax sp. Tytonidae Mammalia Xenarthra Megalonychidae Insectivora Soricidae minimum 3 spp. present Talpidae minimum 2 spp. present Chiroptera Lagomorpha Leporidae Rodentia minimum 6 spp. present Proboscidea Gomphotheriidae Perissodactyla Equidae Cormohipparion emsliei Tapiridae Tapirus polkensis Rhinocerotidae Teleoceras sp. Artiodactyla Tayassuidae Prosthennops sp. sp. indet. Camelidae cf. Megatylopus sp. Carnivora TABLE S1. (Continued) Felidae cf. Machairodus sp.
    [Show full text]
  • Sex Chromosomes and Sex Determination in Reptiles Commentary William S Modi1 and David Crews2
    Sex chromosomes and sex determination in reptiles Commentary William S Modi1 and David Crews2 Reptiles occupy a crucial position with respect to vertebrate three species of fish, and the sequences of over 20 species phylogeny, having roamed the earth for more than 300 million of mammals are complete or underway (http://www. years and given rise to both birds and mammals. To date, this genome.gov/11007951). Interestingly, reptiles have group has been largely ignored by contemporary genomics remained impervious to the watchful eye of the NHGRI’s technologies, although the green anole lizard was recently comparative sequencing program. However, at NHGRI’s recommended for whole genome sequencing. Future request, the Reptile Genome Consortium met in April experiments using flow-sorted chromosome libraries and high- 2005 at Washington University’s Genome Sequencing throughout genomic sequencing will help to discover important Center in St Louis. Their subsequent mission was to findings regarding sex chromosome evolution, early events in consult the scientific community and make recommen- sex determination, and dosage compensation. This information dations to the Institute on which species should be should contribute extensively toward a general understanding considered for whole genome sequencing. Their recom- of the genetic control of development in amniotes. mendation was submitted to NHGRI as a ‘White Paper’ Addresses in July 2005, and the community overwhelmingly chose 1 SAIC Frederick, National Cancer Institute, Core Genotyping Facility, the green anole lizard, Anolis carolinensis, as its first target 8717 Grovemont Circle, Gaithersburg, MD 20877, USA 2 species, with the American alligator, garter snake and/or Section of Integrative Biology, University of Texas, Austin, painted turtle to follow (http://reptilegenome.com).
    [Show full text]
  • Table 1: Protected Area Management Categories in Belize
    Aguacaliente Wildlife Sanctuary – Management Plan 2009-2014 Management Plan Aguacaliente Wildlife Sanctuary 2009 – 2014 DRAFT Wildtracks, 2008 Wildtracks, 2008 0 Aguacaliente Wildlife Sanctuary – Management Plan 2009-2014 Wildtracks, 2008 1 Aguacaliente Wildlife Sanctuary – Management Plan 2009-2014 Contents Contents 1. Introduction 1 1.1 Background and Context 1 1.2 Purpose and Scope of Plan 1 2. Current Status 3 2.1 Location 3 2.2 Regional Context 6 2.3 National Context 9 2.3.1 Legal and Policy Framework 9 2.3.2 Land Tenure 11 2.3.3 Evaluation of Protected Area 12 2.3.4 Socio-Economic Context 16 2.4 Physical Environment of Management Area 24 2.4.1 Climate 24 2.4.2 Geology 26 2.4.3 Soils 26 2.4.4 Hydrology 29 2.5 Biodiversity of Management Area 32 2.5.1 Ecosystems 32 2.5.2 Flora 39 2.5.3 Fauna 39 2.5.4 Past and Present Research 46 2.6 Cultural and Socio-Economic Values of Management Area 47 2.6.1 Community and Stakeholder Use 47 2.6.2 Archaeological Sites 47 2.6.3 Recreation and Tourism Use 47 2.6.4 Other Economic Use 48 2.6.5 Education Use 48 Wildtracks, 2008 2 Aguacaliente Wildlife Sanctuary – Management Plan 2009-2014 3. Conservation Planning 49 3.1 Conservation Targets 49 3.2 Threats to Biodiversity 56 3.3 Strategies to reduce Threats 58 4. Management Planning 65 4.1 Management and Organizational Background 65 4.2 Review of Previous Management Effectiveness 66 4.3 Management Goal 69 4.4 Management Strategies 70 4.4.1 Management Constraints and Limitations 70 4.4.2 Management Zones 70 4.4.3 Limits of Acceptable Change 71 4.5 Management
    [Show full text]
  • Sophie Calmé Jorge L. León-Cortés · Birgit Schmook Editors
    Gerald Alexander Islebe · Sophie Calmé Jorge L. León-Cortés · Birgit Schmook Editors Biodiversity and Conservation of the Yucatán Peninsula Biodiversity and Conservation of the Yucatán Peninsula ThiS is a FM Blank Page Gerald Alexander Islebe • Sophie Calme´ • Jorge L. Leon-Corte ´s • Birgit Schmook Editors Biodiversity and Conservation of the Yucata´n Peninsula Editors Gerald Alexander Islebe Sophie Calme´ El Colegio de la Frontera Sur ECOSUR Universite´ de Sherbrooke Chetumal, Quintana Roo Sherbrooke, Que´bec Mexico Canada Jorge L. Leon-Corte ´s Birgit Schmook El Colegio de la Frontera Sur ECOSUR El Colegio de la Frontera Sur ECOSUR San Cristobal de las Casas, Chiapas Chetumal, Quintana Roo Mexico Mexico ISBN 978-3-319-06528-1 ISBN 978-3-319-06529-8 (eBook) DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-06529-8 Library of Congress Control Number: 2015951833 Springer Cham Heidelberg New York Dordrecht London © Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015 This work is subject to copyright. All rights are reserved by the Publisher, whether the whole or part of the material is concerned, specifically the rights of translation, reprinting, reuse of illustrations, recitation, broadcasting, reproduction on microfilms or in any other physical way, and transmission or information storage and retrieval, electronic adaptation, computer software, or by similar or dissimilar methodology now known or hereafter developed. The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, service marks, etc. in this publication does not imply, even in the absence of a specific statement, that such names are exempt from the relevant protective laws and regulations and therefore free for general use. The publisher, the authors and the editors are safe to assume that the advice and information in this book are believed to be true and accurate at the date of publication.
    [Show full text]
  • Non-Indigenous Animals Regulation 1997* Under the Non-Indigenous Animals Act 1987
    1997 No 454 New South Wales Non-Indigenous Animals Regulation 1997* under the Non-Indigenous Animals Act 1987 His Excellency the Lieutenant-Governor, with the advice of the Executive Council, has made the following Regulation under the Non-Indigenous Animals Act 1987. RICHARD AMERY, M.P., Minister for Agriculture Explanatory note The object of this Regulation is to repeal and remake the Non-Indigenous Animals Regulation 1988 as a consequence of the enactment of the Non-Indigenous Animals Amendment Act 1996 and as part of the staged repeal program. The principal changes are in the categorisation of non-indigenous animals to mirror the uniform categorisation now used by the National Vertebrate Pests Committee, the prescription of these categories in the Regulation instead of the Act and the listing in the Regulation of the species that fall within each category. This Regulation is made under the Non-Indigenous Animals Act ‘1986, including section 29 (the general regulation-making power) and the sections referred to in the individual clauses of the Regulation. This Regulation is made in connection with the staged repeal of subordinate legislation under the Subordinate Legislation Act 1989. * See erratum published in Gazette No 99 of 12.9.97 page 7890 (Extract No 1997—494) Published in Gazette No 95 of 29 August 1997, page 7085 Page 1 1997 No 454 Non-Indigenous Animals Regulation 1997 Contents Page Part 1 Preliminary 1 Name of Regulation 4 2 Commencement 4 3 Definitions and terminology 4 4 Notes 4 Part 2 Classification of animals 5 Prescribed
    [Show full text]