DOCSLIB.ORG

Workshop Document

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Workshop Document WORKSHOP DOCUMENT For the pilot Boreal Natura 2000 Workshop VERSION 11/01/2012 Prepared by N2K Group, namely Jan Dušek, Lenka Vokasová, Anja Finne, Helena Carská, Milan Janák, Pavel Marhoul & Kerstin Sundseth; (with further input and editing by Lawrence Jones-Walters and Mark Snethlage, ECNC and Lubos halada, ILE SAS). PILOT BOREAL NATURA 2000 SEMINAR Content Executive summary............................................................................................................................................3 1. Introduction and general information..........................................................................................................5 1.1 Objectives..................................................................................................................................................5 1.2 Introduction to the biogeographical process.......................................................................................5 1.3 Boreal biogeographical region...............................................................................................................8 1.4 Selection of habitat types and species ..............................................................................................12 2. Grasslands ....................................................................................................................................................14 Habitat type 6210 Semi-natural dry grasslands and scrubland facies on calcareous substrates (Festuco-Brometalia) (* important orchid sites) ......................................................................................15 Habitat type 6270 Fennoscandian lowland species-rich dry to mesic grasslands...........................23 Habitat type 6450 Northern boreal alluvial meadows............................................................................32 Habitat type 6510 Lowland hay meadows (Alopecurus pratensis, Sanguisorba officinalis)..........42 Habitat type 6530 Fennoscandian wooded meadows...........................................................................51 Habitat type 9070 Fennoscandian wooded pastures ............................................................................60 Habitat type 1630 Boreal Baltic coastal meadows.................................................................................69 3. Wetlands........................................................................................................................................................76 Habitat type 7110*Active raised bogs.......................................................................................................77 Habitat type 7120Degraded raised bogs still capable of natural regeneration.................................84 Habitat type 7160Fennoscandian mineral-rich springs and spring fens ............................................90 Habitat type 7230Alkaline fens...................................................................................................................96 Habitat type 91D0Bog woodland .............................................................................................................102 4. Forests .........................................................................................................................................................107 Habitat type 9010Western Taiga .............................................................................................................108 Habitat type 9050Fennoscandian herb-rich forests with Picea abies...............................................117 Habitat type 9060Coniferous forests on, or connected to, glaciofluvial eskers ..............................123 Habitat type 9080Fennoscandian deciduous swamp woods .............................................................130 Habitat type 91E0Alluvial forests with Alnus glutinosa and Fraxinus excelsior..............................136 5. Coastal habitats..........................................................................................................................................141 6. Freshwater habitats ...................................................................................................................................142 Habitat type 3260 Water courses of plain to montane levels with the Ranunculion fluitantis and Callitricho-Batrachion vegetation.............................................................................................................143 Annex I..............................................................................................................................................................151 WORKSHOP DOCUMENT – VERSION 11/01/2012 Page2 PILOT BOREAL NATURA 2000 SEMINAR Executive summary The purpose of the New Biogeographical Process is to help Member States to manage Natura 2000 as a coherent ecological network, whilst exchanging experience and best practice, addressing objectives and priorities and enhancing cooperation and synergies. The process should contribute to the achievement of Favourable Conservation Status-FCS for those habitats and species of community interest (listed in annex one of the Habitats Directive) that have been identified as having priority within the given biogeographic region, with a special focus on the contribution of the Natura 2000 network, but without ignoring horizontal measures were necessary. In the context of the viability of the Natura 2000 network it is important to know how to ensure that habitats also achieve a level of favourable conservation status outside Natura 2000 site boundaries, and also how to address the major threats that occur there. Within the framework of EU nature legislation all member states are committed to achieving favourable conservation status of species and habitat types of community interest and to improve the status of bird species naturally occurring in the EU. This objective is also fundamental to the attainment of the EU 2020 European biodiversity strategy. Designation of Natura 2000 sites requires that the necessary conservation measures are put in place, usually implying proactive management, sometimes including the restoration of sites. Substantial work remains necessary both within the network and in the wider countryside around it in order to improve the current level of only 17% of assessments of the conservation status of species and habitat being favourable. A large variety of approaches, experience and best practices already become available and will likely continue to emerge in the future. There is also a need for clarity in relation to conservation and restoration priorities for Natura 2000 sites and improve the ways for attracting the financing for the network adequate dissemination and learning from these practices will be crucial in ensuring that the targets for nature conservation are met. Initial assessment by the European Commission suggest that there are significant differences between member states in the level of progress and preparing us for the designation and management of Natura 2000 sites. The new process has been introduced in order to enhance cooperation and coherence in relation to the protection and management of Natura 2000 between member states which share the same biogeographic regions. It is a highly novel and innovative approach in that it involves all major actors involved in the management of Natura 2000 including the competent national authorities, the European Commission, the European Environmental Agency, the European Topic Centre on Biological Diversity, governmental and non-governmental experts, environmental NGOs and other stakeholder organistions from each of the countries involved. This cooperative approach offers a number of advantages in terms of ownership for outcomes and solutions amongst the stakeholders and across country and other administrative boundaries. It has already established new networks within which key players can share practical (empirical) and technical knowledge in relation to the management of key habitats. The active debate has identified existing and emerging issues to be addressed, including examples of best practice and case studies. The process itself involves the collection and compilation of information on management of selected habitat types, ad hoc expert meetings, workshops and culminates with seminars in which the outcomes of the workshop and its key recommendations can be debated and adopted. This Workshop document is the first major output of the New Biogeographical Process as applied to Boreal Biogeographical Region. It is aimed to establish the basis for the discussions during the preparatory workshop (25 and 26 January 2012 in Helsinki) and the preparation of the pilot biogeographical seminar for the Boreal region. The workshop document will serve as a technical background document for the discussions on the main issues which will start at the workshop and continue at the seminar where seminar conclusions and recommendations will be adopted. The workshop and the seminar will focus on possible WORKSHOP DOCUMENT – VERSION 11/01/2012 Page3 PILOT BOREAL NATURA 2000 SEMINAR conclusions, recommendations and proposals for action that can be drawn from that document. The document can still be improved between the workshop and the seminar while new information becomes available. At the seminar it will be available as the 'seminar back-ground document'. After the seminar, the document can still be further improved, extended and updated while progressively developing towards an
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Révision Taxinomique Et Nomenclaturale Des Rhopalocera Et Des Zygaenidae De France Métropolitaine
    Direction de la Recherche, de l’Expertise et de la Valorisation Direction Déléguée au Développement Durable, à la Conservation de la Nature et à l’Expertise Service du Patrimoine Naturel Dupont P, Luquet G. Chr., Demerges D., Drouet E. Révision taxinomique et nomenclaturale des Rhopalocera et des Zygaenidae de France métropolitaine. Conséquences sur l’acquisition et la gestion des données d’inventaire. Rapport SPN 2013 - 19 (Septembre 2013) Dupont (Pascal), Demerges (David), Drouet (Eric) et Luquet (Gérard Chr.). 2013. Révision systématique, taxinomique et nomenclaturale des Rhopalocera et des Zygaenidae de France métropolitaine. Conséquences sur l’acquisition et la gestion des données d’inventaire. Rapport MMNHN-SPN 2013 - 19, 201 p. Résumé : Les études de phylogénie moléculaire sur les Lépidoptères Rhopalocères et Zygènes sont de plus en plus nombreuses ces dernières années modifiant la systématique et la taxinomie de ces deux groupes. Une mise à jour complète est réalisée dans ce travail. Un cadre décisionnel a été élaboré pour les niveaux spécifiques et infra-spécifique avec une approche intégrative de la taxinomie. Ce cadre intégre notamment un aspect biogéographique en tenant compte des zones-refuges potentielles pour les espèces au cours du dernier maximum glaciaire. Cette démarche permet d’avoir une approche homogène pour le classement des taxa aux niveaux spécifiques et infra-spécifiques. Les conséquences pour l’acquisition des données dans le cadre d’un inventaire national sont développées. Summary : Studies on molecular phylogenies of Butterflies and Burnets have been increasingly frequent in the recent years, changing the systematics and taxonomy of these two groups. A full update has been performed in this work.
    [Show full text]
  • Review Article Conservation Status of the Family Orchidaceae in Spain Based on European, National, and Regional Catalogues of Protected Species
    Hind ile Scientific Volume 2018, Article ID 7958689, 18 pages https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/7958689 Hindawi Review Article Conservation Status of the Family Orchidaceae in Spain Based on European, National, and Regional Catalogues of Protected Species Daniel de la Torre Llorente© Biotechnology-Plant Biology Department, Higher Technical School of Agronomic, Food and Biosystems Engineering, Universidad Politecnica de Madrid, 28140 Madrid, Spain Correspondence should be addressed to Daniel de la Torre Llorente; [email protected] Received 22 June 2017; Accepted 28 December 2017; Published 30 January 2018 Academic Editor: Antonio Amorim Copyright © 2018 Daniel de la Torre Llorente. Tis is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Tis report reviews the European, National, and Regional catalogues of protected species, focusing specifcally on the Orchidaceae family to determine which species seem to be well-protected and where they are protected. Moreover, this examination highlights which species appear to be underprotected and therefore need to be included in some catalogues of protection or be catalogued under some category of protection. Te national and regional catalogues that should be implemented are shown, as well as what species should be included within them. Tis report should be a helpful guideline for environmental policies about orchids conservation in Spain, at least at the regional and national level. Around 76% of the Spanish orchid fora are listed with any fgure of protection or included in any red list, either nationally (about 12-17%) or regionally (72%).
    [Show full text]
  • Latvijas Universitātes Zinātniskie Raksti Acta Universitatis Latviensis
    ISSN 1407-2157 Latvijas Universitātes Zinātniskie Raksti Acta Universitatis Latviensis 613 LATVIJAS PURVU VEĢETĀCIJAS KLASIFIKĀCIJA UN DINAMIKA Latvijas Universitāte Latvijas purvu veģetācijas klasifikācija un dinamika Zinātniskie raksti 613. sējums Rīga 1998 -) / Latvijas punu veģetācijas klasifikācija un dinamika: Zinātniskie raksti/Redkolēģija: V.Kreile, M.Laiviņš, A.Namatēva. Rīga: LU, 1998. 92 Ipp. Rakstu krājumā apkopoti pēdējo gadu Latvijas purvu un ezeru krastu veģetācijas pētījumu rezultāti. Analizēti Teicu purva veidošanās apstākļi pēc putekšņu diagrammām. Publicētas purvu augu sabiedrību sintaksonomijas shēmas un sinoptiskās tabulas. Pētījumu rezultātus var izmantot bioloģijas un ģeogrāfijas studenti un citi interesenti. Redakcijas kolēģija: Vija Kreile, Māris Laiviņš, Anita Namatēva © Teicu valsts rezervāts, 1998 PRIEKŠVĀRDS 1997.gada 20.-21.oktobri Teicu rezervātā notika seminārs "Purvu veģetācijas klasifikācija, kartēšana un aizsardzība Latvijā", kurā piedalījās Latvijas Universitātes Bioloģijas un Ģeogrāfijas un Zemes zinātņu fakultāšu, Valsts Ģeoloģijas dienesta, Latvijas Valsts Mežzinātnes institūta "Silava" un Teicu valsts rezervāta speciālisti. Latvijas lielākajā purvu masīvā Teicos notika ekspedīcijas semināra dalībnieku iepazīstināšanai ar sūnu purvu ciņu un lāmu, pārejas un zāļu purvu, ezeru aizaugšanas joslu un palienes pļavu veģetāciju 2 maršrutos: Stiebriņi Kurtavas ezers Šūmāna ezers un Silagals Tolkajas ezers Siksala Islienas ezers. Seminārā tika nolasīti 8 ziņojumi par purvu veģetācijas un floras pētījumiem dažādos Latvijas reģionos, demonstrētas kartes un sintaksonomijas shēmas. Šajā rakstu krājumā publicēti semināra materiāli. Semināra norisi un rakstu krājuma sagatavošanu atbalstīja LR Vides aizsardzības fonds un Teicu valsts rezervāts. SATURS M.Laiviņš. Latvijas ziedaugu un paparžaugu sabiedrību augstākie sintaksoni 7 M.Pakalne. Latvijas purvu veģetācijas raksturojums 23 A. Lācis, L.Kalniņa. Purvu uzbūve un attīstība Teicu valsts rezervātā 39 B.Bambe. Purvu veģetācijas dinamika Teicu rezervātā 56 S.Jermacāne.
    [Show full text]
  • The Red Data List of Irish Plants
    The Red Data List of Irish Plants The risks that species face are each very different, however, as a guide to the susceptibility of a given species, an agreed set of categories has been established internationally, and these are used to determine the potential risk that a species could become extinct. These categories are:- CRITICALLY ENDANGERED or CR - Species that are declining at a fast rate, and face imminent risk of extinction. ENDANGERED or E - Species that are declining, or grow in habitats likely to be disturbed, 'developed' or facing an ongoing degradation. VULNERABLE or V - Species that are currently not endangered, but would be extremely vulnerable if their habitats are disturbed in the future. There are seven species of plant that require immediate intervention (CR) if we are to save them from joining the fate of 11 other species that are now known to be extinct in Ireland. A number of these are already extinct in the Republic, and are not therefore legally protected under the 1999 Flora Protection Act. In the list below, 188 species of plant are listed, of which 64 are flowering plants, 4 ferns, 14 mosses, 4 liverworts, 1 lichen and 2 algae. Protected=1999 Flora Protection Order; (protected)= formerly protected by 1987 Order; {protected}= formerly protected by 1980 Order; (NI)= protected in Northern Ireland only. EXTINCT (9) Pheasant's-eye Adonis annua -- Corncockle Agrostemma githago Cogal Corn Chamomile Anthemis arvensis Fíogadán goirt Purple Spurge Euphorbia peplis Spuirse dhearg Sea Stock Matthiola sinuata Tonóg chladaigh
    [Show full text]
  • The Cytogenetics of Carex Flava and Its Allies* I
    THE CYTOGENETICS OF CAREX FLAVA AND ITS ALLIES* By ELIZABETH W. DAVIES University College of Leicester I. Introduction Il. Cytological Technique Ill. Chromosome Numbers IV. Hybrids and.Hybridisation A. Natural Hybrids B. Artificial Hybrids V. Discussion VI. Conclusion and Summary VII. Acknowledgments 1. INTRODUCTION This group of closely allied species included in the section Extensae of the subgenus Carex is represented in Great Britain by: Carex flava L., C. Zepidocarpa Tausch, C. demissa Hornem., C. serotina Merat, and C. scandinavica E. W. Davies. The taxonomy of these species has caused difficulty for many years, and, although the chromosome numbers have been investigated by workers in Sweden, Japan and America, there has been considerable discrepancy in their results (see below), and no counts have previously been made on British material. Haploid Species Chromosome Number Determined by : Date C. extensa Good. 30 Wulff 1937 C. flava L. 29 Tanaka 1942.1948 30 Heilbom 1939 30 Wahl 1940 C. lepidocarpa Tausch 29 Tanaka 1942.1948 34 Heilbom 1924 "C. oederi Retz" = C. serotina Merat 36 Heilbom 1922.1924.1928 35 Tanaka 1948 2. CYTOLOGICAL TECHNIQUE The cytological technique employed throughout this investigation is a modification of the aceto-carmine squash method by the addition of a drop of iron alum. The Carices have exceedingly small chromosomes and hard wiry roots, which make them difficult cytological material. The original attempts to count the chromosomes of this genus were made at mitosis using root tips. First embedding and sectioning methods were tried and later the root tip squash technique was used, staining with Feulgen, aceto-carmine, or a combination of the two stains together.
    [Show full text]
  • Pinery Provincial Park Vascular Plant List Flowering Latin Name Common Name Community Date
    Pinery Provincial Park Vascular Plant List Flowering Latin Name Common Name Community Date EQUISETACEAE HORSETAIL FAMILY Equisetum arvense L. Field Horsetail FF Equisetum fluviatile L. Water Horsetail LRB Equisetum hyemale L. ssp. affine (Engelm.) Stone Common Scouring-rush BS Equisetum laevigatum A. Braun Smooth Scouring-rush WM Equisetum variegatum Scheich. ex Fried. ssp. Small Horsetail LRB Variegatum DENNSTAEDIACEAE BRACKEN FAMILY Pteridium aquilinum (L.) Kuhn Bracken-Fern COF DRYOPTERIDACEAE TRUE FERN FAMILILY Athyrium filix-femina (L.) Roth ssp. angustum (Willd.) Northeastern Lady Fern FF Clausen Cystopteris bulbifera (L.) Bernh. Bulblet Fern FF Dryopteris carthusiana (Villars) H.P. Fuchs Spinulose Woodfern FF Matteuccia struthiopteris (L.) Tod. Ostrich Fern FF Onoclea sensibilis L. Sensitive Fern FF Polystichum acrostichoides (Michaux) Schott Christmas Fern FF ADDER’S-TONGUE- OPHIOGLOSSACEAE FERN FAMILY Botrychium virginianum (L.) Sw. Rattlesnake Fern FF FLOWERING FERN OSMUNDACEAE FAMILY Osmunda regalis L. Royal Fern WM POLYPODIACEAE POLYPODY FAMILY Polypodium virginianum L. Rock Polypody FF MAIDENHAIR FERN PTERIDACEAE FAMILY Adiantum pedatum L. ssp. pedatum Northern Maidenhair Fern FF THELYPTERIDACEAE MARSH FERN FAMILY Thelypteris palustris (Salisb.) Schott Marsh Fern WM LYCOPODIACEAE CLUB MOSS FAMILY Lycopodium lucidulum Michaux Shining Clubmoss OF Lycopodium tristachyum Pursh Ground-cedar COF SELAGINELLACEAE SPIKEMOSS FAMILY Selaginella apoda (L.) Fern. Spikemoss LRB CUPRESSACEAE CYPRESS FAMILY Juniperus communis L. Common Juniper Jun-E DS Juniperus virginiana L. Red Cedar Jun-E SD Thuja occidentalis L. White Cedar LRB PINACEAE PINE FAMILY Larix laricina (Duroi) K. Koch Tamarack Jun LRB Pinus banksiana Lambert Jack Pine COF Pinus resinosa Sol. ex Aiton Red Pine Jun-M CF Pinery Provincial Park Vascular Plant List 1 Pinery Provincial Park Vascular Plant List Flowering Latin Name Common Name Community Date Pinus strobus L.
    [Show full text]
  • Carex of New England
    Field Guide to Carex of New England Lisa A. Standley A Special Publication of the New England Botanical Club About the Author: Lisa A. Standley is an environmental consultant. She obtained a B.S, and M.S. from Cornell University and Ph.D. from the University of Washington. She has published several articles on the systematics of Carex, particularly Section Phacocystis, and was the author of several section treatments in the Flora of North America. Cover Illustrations: Pictured are Carex pensylvanica and Carex intumescens. Field Guide to Carex of New England Lisa A. Standley Special Publication of the New England Botanical Club Copyright © 2011 Lisa A. Standley Acknowledgements This book is dedicated to Robert Reed, who first urged me to write a user-friendly guide to Carex; to the memory of Melinda F. Denton, my mentor and inspiration; and to Tony Reznicek, for always sharing his expertise. I would like to thank all of the people who helped with this book in so many ways, particularly Karen Searcy and Robert Bertin for their careful editing; Paul Somers, Bruce Sorrie, Alice Schori, Pam Weatherbee, and others who helped search for sedges; Arthur Gilman, Melissa Dow Cullina, and Patricia Swain, who carefully read early drafts of the book; and to Emily Wood, Karen Searcy, and Ray Angelo, who provided access to the herbaria at Harvard University, the University of Massachusetts, and the New England Botanical Club. CONTENTS Introduction .......................................................................................................................1
    [Show full text]
  • Calcium Core
    Durham E-Theses The ecology of carex acca schreb and carex panicea L. Rieley, John, O. How to cite: Rieley, John, O. (1967) The ecology of carex acca schreb and carex panicea L., Durham theses, Durham University. Available at Durham E-Theses Online: http://etheses.dur.ac.uk/8684/ Use policy The full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-prot purposes provided that: • a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in Durham E-Theses • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. Please consult the full Durham E-Theses policy for further details. Academic Support Oce, Durham University, University Oce, Old Elvet, Durham DH1 3HP e-mail: [email protected] Tel: +44 0191 334 6107 http://etheses.dur.ac.uk !I!HE ECOLOGY OF CAIIEX PLACCA SCHREB, AM) CAEEX PANICEA L.. A thesis submitted to the University of Diirhajn: for the degree; of DOCTOR OF ffilLOSOIHY JOHN 0. EIEIiEY BWSb* Glasgow, (St, GUtMjert's) School of Plant Biology, University College of North Wales, Bangor. September 1967. This thesis, which is entirely the result of my own work, has not been accepted for any degree and is not being submitted concurrently in caxididature for any other degree* page, ACENOWLBDC^MENTS ii ABSTRACT iii I^rt !• INTRODUCTION t Part II, CULTURE EXPERIMENTS 19 Methods 20 Experimient 1» - response to calcium and pH level , 26 Eacperiment 2# - variation of external calcium concentration., 38 Experiment 3« - variation of external potassium concentration,, 56 Part III, NUTRIENT DYNAMICS 60 Methods 61 Results •• • 63 Part IV, GENERAL DISCUSSION 80 Part V, APPENDICES 100 1» The growth chamber • 100 2, The culture solution ..*••• 102 3, Chemical analysis techniques , IO7 Collecting sites ,•.,•••••,•••,•«,, 127 5, Tables of results 1l31i Part VI, LITERATURE CITED •• I66 IX.
    [Show full text]
  • Large Impact Crater Histories of Mars: the Effect of Different Model Crater Age Techniques ⇑ Stuart J
    Icarus 225 (2013) 173–184 Contents lists available at SciVerse ScienceDirect Icarus journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/icarus Large impact crater histories of Mars: The effect of different model crater age techniques ⇑ Stuart J. Robbins a, , Brian M. Hynek a,b, Robert J. Lillis c, William F. Bottke d a Laboratory for Atmospheric and Space Physics, 3665 Discovery Drive, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO 80309, United States b Department of Geological Sciences, 3665 Discovery Drive, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO 80309, United States c UC Berkeley Space Sciences Laboratory, 7 Gauss Way, Berkeley, CA 94720, United States d Southwest Research Institute and NASA Lunar Science Institute, 1050 Walnut Street, Suite 300, Boulder, CO 80302, United States article info abstract Article history: Impact events that produce large craters primarily occurred early in the Solar System’s history because Received 25 June 2012 the largest bolides were remnants from planet ary formation .Determi ning when large impacts occurred Revised 6 February 2013 on a planetary surface such as Mars can yield clues to the flux of material in the early inner Solar System Accepted 25 March 2013 which, in turn, can constrain other planet ary processes such as the timing and magnitude of resur facing Available online 3 April 2013 and the history of the martian core dynamo. We have used a large, global planetary databas ein conjunc- tion with geomorpholog icmapping to identify craters superposed on the rims of 78 larger craters with Keywords: diameters D P 150 km on Mars, 78% of which have not been previously dated in this manner.
    [Show full text]
  • Systematics, Phylogeography and Polyploid Evolution in the Dactylorhiza Maculata Complex (Orchidaceae)
    Systematics, phylogeography and polyploid evolution in the Dactylorhiza maculata complex (Orchidaceae) Ståhlberg, David 2007 Link to publication Citation for published version (APA): Ståhlberg, D. (2007). Systematics, phylogeography and polyploid evolution in the Dactylorhiza maculata complex (Orchidaceae). Department of Ecology, Lund University. Total number of authors: 1 General rights Unless other specific re-use rights are stated the following general rights apply: Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. • Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research. • You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain • You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal Read more about Creative commons licenses: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/ Take down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. LUND UNIVERSITY PO Box 117 221 00 Lund +46 46-222 00 00 Systematics, phylogeography and polyploid evolution in the Dactylorhiza maculata complex (Orchidaceae) David Ståhlberg AKADEMISK AVHANDLING som för avläggande av filosofie doktorsexamen vid naturvetenskapliga fakulteten, Lunds universitet, kommer att offentligen försvaras vid Ekologiska institutionen, Avdelningen för växtekologi och systematik, fredagen den 27 april 2007 kl 10.00. Plats: Röda rummet, Ekologihuset, Sölvegatan 37.
    [Show full text]
  • Apollo 17 Press
    7A-/ a NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION Washington. D . C . 20546 202-755-8370 FOR RELEASE: Sunday t RELEASE NO: 72-220K November 26. 1972 B PROJECT: APOLLO 17 (To be launched no P earlier than Dec . 6) R E contents 1-5 6-13 U APOLLC 17 MISSION OBJECTIVES .............14 LAUNCH OPERATIONS .................. 15-17 COUNTDOWN ....................... 18-21 Launch Windows .................. 20 3 Ground Elapsed Time Update ............ 20-21 LAUNCH AND MISSION PROFILE .............. 22-32 Launch Events .................. 24-26 Mission Events .................. 26-28 EVA Mission Events ................ 29-32 APOLLO 17 LANDING SITE ................ 33-36 LUNAR SURFACE SCIENCE ................ 37-55 S-IVB Lunar Impact ................ 37 ALSEP ...................... 37 K SNAP-27 ..................... 38-39 Heat Flow Experiment ............... 40 Lunar Ejecta and Meteorites ........... 41 Lunar Seismic Profiling ............. 41-42 I Lunar Atmospheric Composition Experiment ..... 43 Lunar Surface Gravimeter ............. 43-44 Traverse Gravimeter ............... 44-45 Surface Electrical Properties 45 I-) .......... T Lunar Neutron Probe ............... 46 1 Soil Mechanics .................. 46-47 Lunar Geology Investigation ........... 48-51 Lunar Geology Hand Tools ............. 52-54 Long Term Surface Exposure Experiment ...... 54-55 -more- November 14. 1972 i2 LUNAR ORBITAL SCIENCE ............... .5 6.61 Lunar Sounder ................. .5 6.57 Infrared Scanning Radiometer ......... .5 7.58 Far-Ultraviolet Spectrometer ..........5
    [Show full text]
  • Orchid Observers
    Phenology of UK Plants Orchids and Zooniverse Mark Spencer & Kath Castillo Department of Life Sciences Natural History Museum Agrimonia eupatoria Robbirt & al. 2011 and UK specimens of Ophrys sphegodes Mill NHM Origins and Evolution Initiative: UK Phenology Project • 20,000 herbarium sheets imaged and transcribed • Volunteer contributed taxonomic revision, morphometric and plant/insect pollinator data compiled • Extension of volunteer work to extract additional phenology data from other UK museums and botanic gardens • 7,000 herbarium sheets curated and mounted • Collaboration with BSBI/Herbaria@Home • Preliminary analyses of orchid phenology underway Robbirt & al. (2011) . Validation of biological collections as a source of phenological data for use in climate change studies: a case study with the orchid Ophrys sphegodes. J. Ecol. Brooks, Self, Toloni & Sparks (2014). Natural history museum collections provide information on phenological change in British butterflies since the late-nineteenth century. Int. J. Biometeorol. Johnson & al. (2011) Climate Change and Biosphere Response: Unlocking the Collections Vault. Bioscience. Specimens of Gymnadenia conopsea (L.) R.Br Orchid Observers Phenology of UK Plants Orchids and Zooniverse Mark Spencer & Kath Castillo Department of Life Sciences Natural History Museum 56 species of wild orchid in the UK 29 taxa selected for this study Anacamptis morio Anacamptis pyramidalis Cephalanthera damasonium Coeloglossum viride Corallorhiza trifida Dactylorhiza fuchsii Dactylorhiza incarnata Dactylorhiza maculata Dactylorhiza praetermissa Dactylorhiza purpurella Epipactis palustris Goodyera repens Gymnadenia borealis Gymnadenia conopsea Gymnadenia densiflora Hammarbya paludosa Herminium monorchis Neotinea ustulata Neottia cordata Neottia nidus-avis Neottia ovata Ophrys apifera Ophrys insectifera Orchis anthropophora Orchis mascula Platanthera bifolia Platanthera chlorantha Pseudorchis albida Spiranthes spiralis Fly orchid (Ophrys insectifera) Participants: 1.
    [Show full text]