DOCSLIB.ORG

Handbook a “Improving the Availability of Data and Information

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Handbook a “Improving the Availability of Data and Information Improving the availability of data and information on species, habitats and sites Focus Area A Handbook on the application of existing scientific approaches, methods, tools and knowledge for a better implementation of the Birds and Habitat Directives Environment FOCUS AREA A IMPROVING THE AVAILABILITY OF DATA AND i INFORMATION ON SPECIES, HABITATS AND SITES Imprint Disclaimer This document has been prepared for the European Commis- sion. The information and views set out in the handbook are Citation those of the authors only and do not necessarily reflect the Schmidt, A.M. & Van der Sluis, T. (2021). E-BIND Handbook (Part A): Improving the availability of data and official opinion of the Commission. The Commission does not information on species, habitats and sites. Wageningen Environmental Research/ Ecologic Institute /Milieu Ltd. guarantee the accuracy of the data included. The Commission Wageningen, The Netherlands. or any person acting on the Commission’s behalf cannot be held responsible for any use which may be made of the information Authors contained therein. Lead authors: This handbook has been prepared under a contract with the Anne Schmidt, Chris van Swaay (Monitoring of species and habitats within and beyond Natura 2000 sites) European Commission, in cooperation with relevant stakehold- Sander Mücher, Gerard Hazeu (Remote sensing techniques for the monitoring of Natura 2000 sites) ers. (EU Service contract Nr. 07.027740/2018/783031/ENV.D.3 Anne Schmidt, Chris van Swaay, Rene Henkens, Peter Verweij (Access to data and information) for evidence-based improvements in the Birds and Habitat Kris Decleer, Rienk-Jan Bijlsma (Approaches and tools for effective restoration measures for species and habitats) directives (BHD) implementation: systematic review and meta- Theo van der Sluis, Rob Jongman (Green Infrastructure and network coherence) analysis). Theo van der Sluis (Co-benefts (ecosystem services) of measures to consolidate the Natura 2000 network) Acknowledgement is made to all people that have made contributions, that provided comments and remarks during consultations or have contributed in other ways to this publication. The full list of organisations that have provided input in any form is included at the end of the handbook, p.87. Layout Beáta Welk Vargová, Ecologic Institute Copyright European Commission, 2021 Reproduction is authorised provided the source is acknowledged Copy deadline 31 March 2021 Image credits Cover page: © Theo van der Sluis; P. 4: © Hugh Jansman/Wageningen Environmental Research; P. 32: © Sander Mucher; P. 60: © Hellen Grig/Shutterstock.com FOCUS AREA A IMPROVING THE AVAILABILITY OF DATA AND 1 INFORMATION ON SPECIES, HABITATS AND SITES Table of Contents Foreword I. Monitoring of species and habitats 4 By DG ENV I.1 Introduction 5 With these handbooks, the European Commission intends to I.2 Smart sampling and data analysis 8 support Member State authorities and other stakeholders in making better use of scientific knowledge in implementing I.3 Observation technologies 18 the EU Birds and Habitats Directive. Building on the evidence I.4 Modelling approaches 19 gathered during the Fitness Check of the EU’s nature legislation, this project made the effort to mobilise the scientific community I.5 Key findings 22 in order to close knowledge gaps, to offer solutions to strategic I.6 References 26 problems and to enhance the accessibility of scientific informa- tion to policy makers and all players involved in implementation. Annex 1: Monitoring of natural habitats 31 The handbooks cover the most important areas as identified II. Contribution of Remote Sensing Techniques for monitoring 40 in the Fitness Check. These comprise methods for monitoring, Natura 2000 sites reporting and assessing conservation status as well as infor- II.1 Introduction 41 mation and approaches required for effective site and network II.2 Current use of Remote Sensing for Natura 2000 monitoring 47 management, including setting conservation objectives, prepar- ing management plans, implementing conservation measures II.3 Key findings and recommendations 59 and evaluating their impact. II.4 References 63 By analysing relevant knowledge, evidence, tools, approaches Annex 1: Examples of useful satellite imagery 67 and good practices and by bringing together scientists and scientific networks of relevance, the handbooks try to bring the III. Access to data and information 68 scientific community closer to those that implement the nature III.1 Introduction 69 directives on the ground. III.2 Strategies, approaches and practical examples to improve data and information 71 access III.3 Key findings and recommendations 83 III.4 References 85 FOCUS AREA A IMPROVING THE AVAILABILITY OF DATA AND 2 INFORMATION ON SPECIES, HABITATS AND SITES Background The Birds Directive established an EU-wide protection regime in 1979 for all bird species naturally occurring in the EU, including a classification by Member States of Special Protection Areas (SPA) for threatened and migratory birds. This approach was extended through the Habitats Directive in 1992. The Habitats Directive also provided for the establishment of a representative system of legally protected areas throughout the EU, known as Special Areas of Conservation (SAC). Together, SPAs and SACs form the Natura 2000 network. The aim of both Directives is to ensure the long-term sustainability of the habitats and species they have been set up to protect. Together the Nature Directives provide a comprehensive protection regime for certain particularly rare and threatened species and for typical and valuable habitats in the EU. Between 2014 and 2016, the European Commission carried out a Fitness Check of both Directives. Based on this comprehensive evaluation it was concluded that the Nature Directives “remain highly relevant and are fit for purpose”, but also that achieving the objectives and realizing their full potential will depend upon substantially improving their implementation. The review proposed that improvements are needed both in their effectiveness and efficiency and in working in partnership with different stakeholder communities in the Member States and across the EU in order to deliver practical results on the ground. The Fitness Check also recognised that the existence of remaining knowledge gaps may have led to inefficiencies. Specifically important is access to adequate, reliable knowledge, which is essential for many of the activities associated with the implementation of the directives. The EU Biodiversity Strategy for 2030 formulates 17 commitments (targets) under two main headings: Nature Protection and an EU Nature Restoration Plan. The targets and how to measure success are yet to be defined. Legally binding EU nature restoration targets will be proposed in 2021. By 2030, significant areas of degraded and carbon-rich ecosystems are restored; habitats and species show no deterioration in conservation trends and status; and at least 30% reach favourable conservation status or at least show a positive trend. The Biodiversity Strategy 2030 highlights nature-based solutions (NBS) as a means to help achieve a number of the restoration ambitions while linking to other policies (primarily climate change mitigation and adaptation and urban biodiversity). FOCUS AREA A IMPROVING THE AVAILABILITY OF DATA AND 3 INFORMATION ON SPECIES, HABITATS AND SITES The E-BIND handbooks The E-BIND handbook(s) are meant to assist decision makers, spatial planners, conservationists, NGOs and other organisations involved in the implementation of the Birds and Habitat Directives. The handbook(s) contains good practical examples, literature references and links to relevant websites. The two handbooks cover the focus areas: A. Improving the availability of data and information on species, habitats and sites B. Scientific support for successful implementation of the Natura 2000 network Focus Area A, availability of data and information on habitats and species and sites (this handbook) seeks to provide in the lack of data and access to data, including remotely sensed information and monitoring data. The handbook consists of the following three sections: I. Monitoring of species and habitats II. Contribution of Remote Sensing Techniques for monitoring Natura 2000 sites III. Access to data and information Focus Area B focuses on the effectiveness of the Natura 2000 network and conservation successes, and therefore looks at habitat management and restoration, as well as the wider landscape with Green Infrastructure and Ecosystem services. That handbook consists of the following three sections: I. Approaches and tools for effective restoration measures for species and habitats II. Green infrastructure and network coherence III. Co-benefits (ecosystem services) of measures to consolidate the Natura 2000 network MONITORING OF SPECIES AND HABITATS 4 CHAPTER A.I. Monitoring of species and habitats Anne Schmidt & Chris van Swaay MONITORING OF SPECIES AND HABITATS 5 I.1 Introduction This chapter of the handbook focuses on the monitoring of species and habitat types targeted by the Birds Directive and Habitats Directive both inside and outside the Natura 2000 network. It discusses both the current practices by e.g. the different Member States (as far as informa- tion is available) and the opportunities for improvements in terms of approaches, methods and techniques offered by the scientific community. The monitoring of species and habitat types is needed for policy purposes, e.g. reporting by the EU
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Review Article Conservation Status of the Family Orchidaceae in Spain Based on European, National, and Regional Catalogues of Protected Species
    Hind ile Scientific Volume 2018, Article ID 7958689, 18 pages https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/7958689 Hindawi Review Article Conservation Status of the Family Orchidaceae in Spain Based on European, National, and Regional Catalogues of Protected Species Daniel de la Torre Llorente© Biotechnology-Plant Biology Department, Higher Technical School of Agronomic, Food and Biosystems Engineering, Universidad Politecnica de Madrid, 28140 Madrid, Spain Correspondence should be addressed to Daniel de la Torre Llorente; [email protected] Received 22 June 2017; Accepted 28 December 2017; Published 30 January 2018 Academic Editor: Antonio Amorim Copyright © 2018 Daniel de la Torre Llorente. Tis is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Tis report reviews the European, National, and Regional catalogues of protected species, focusing specifcally on the Orchidaceae family to determine which species seem to be well-protected and where they are protected. Moreover, this examination highlights which species appear to be underprotected and therefore need to be included in some catalogues of protection or be catalogued under some category of protection. Te national and regional catalogues that should be implemented are shown, as well as what species should be included within them. Tis report should be a helpful guideline for environmental policies about orchids conservation in Spain, at least at the regional and national level. Around 76% of the Spanish orchid fora are listed with any fgure of protection or included in any red list, either nationally (about 12-17%) or regionally (72%).
    [Show full text]
  • Inter-Island Variation in the Butterfly Hipparchia (Pseudotergumia) Wyssii (Christ, 1889) (Lepidoptera, Satyrinae) in the Canary Islands *David A
    Nota lepid. 17 (3/4): 175-200 ;30.1V.1995 ISSN 0342-7536 Inter-island variation in the butterfly Hipparchia (Pseudotergumia) wyssii (Christ, 1889) (Lepidoptera, Satyrinae) in the Canary Islands *David A. S. SMITH*& Denis E OWES** * Natural History bluseurn, Eton College. H’indsor, Berkshire SL4 6EW. England ** School of Biological and Molecular Sciences, Oxford Brookes University, Headinpon, Oxford 0x3 OBP, England (l) Summary Samples of the endemic Canary grayling butterfly, Hipparchia (Pseudoter- gumia) wyssii (Christ, 1889), were obtained from al1 five of the Canary Islands where it occurs. Each island population comprises a distinct subspecies but the differences between thern are quantitative rather than qualitative ; hence a systern is devised by which elernents of the wing pattern are scored to permit quantitative analysis. The results demonstrate significant inter-island differences in wing size and wing pattern. The underside of the hindwing shows the greatest degree of inter-island vanation. This is the only wing surface that is always visible in a resting butterfly ; its coloration is highly cryptic and it is suggested that the pattern was evolved in response to selection by predators long before H. wyssii or its ancestors reached the Canaries. Subsequent evolution of the details of the wing pattern differed frorn island to island because each island population was probably founded by few individuals with only a fraction of the genetic diversity of the species. It is postulated that the basic “grayling” wing pattern is determined by natural selection, but the precise expression of this pattern on each island is circumscnbed by the limited gene pool of the original founders.
    [Show full text]
  • Atlas of the Flora of New England: Fabaceae
    Angelo, R. and D.E. Boufford. 2013. Atlas of the flora of New England: Fabaceae. Phytoneuron 2013-2: 1–15 + map pages 1– 21. Published 9 January 2013. ISSN 2153 733X ATLAS OF THE FLORA OF NEW ENGLAND: FABACEAE RAY ANGELO1 and DAVID E. BOUFFORD2 Harvard University Herbaria 22 Divinity Avenue Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138-2020 [email protected] [email protected] ABSTRACT Dot maps are provided to depict the distribution at the county level of the taxa of Magnoliophyta: Fabaceae growing outside of cultivation in the six New England states of the northeastern United States. The maps treat 172 taxa (species, subspecies, varieties, and hybrids, but not forms) based primarily on specimens in the major herbaria of Maine, New Hampshire, Vermont, Massachusetts, Rhode Island, and Connecticut, with most data derived from the holdings of the New England Botanical Club Herbarium (NEBC). Brief synonymy (to account for names used in standard manuals and floras for the area and on herbarium specimens), habitat, chromosome information, and common names are also provided. KEY WORDS: flora, New England, atlas, distribution, Fabaceae This article is the eleventh in a series (Angelo & Boufford 1996, 1998, 2000, 2007, 2010, 2011a, 2011b, 2012a, 2012b, 2012c) that presents the distributions of the vascular flora of New England in the form of dot distribution maps at the county level (Figure 1). Seven more articles are planned. The atlas is posted on the internet at http://neatlas.org, where it will be updated as new information becomes available. This project encompasses all vascular plants (lycophytes, pteridophytes and spermatophytes) at the rank of species, subspecies, and variety growing independent of cultivation in the six New England states.
    [Show full text]
  • The Red Data List of Irish Plants
    The Red Data List of Irish Plants The risks that species face are each very different, however, as a guide to the susceptibility of a given species, an agreed set of categories has been established internationally, and these are used to determine the potential risk that a species could become extinct. These categories are:- CRITICALLY ENDANGERED or CR - Species that are declining at a fast rate, and face imminent risk of extinction. ENDANGERED or E - Species that are declining, or grow in habitats likely to be disturbed, 'developed' or facing an ongoing degradation. VULNERABLE or V - Species that are currently not endangered, but would be extremely vulnerable if their habitats are disturbed in the future. There are seven species of plant that require immediate intervention (CR) if we are to save them from joining the fate of 11 other species that are now known to be extinct in Ireland. A number of these are already extinct in the Republic, and are not therefore legally protected under the 1999 Flora Protection Act. In the list below, 188 species of plant are listed, of which 64 are flowering plants, 4 ferns, 14 mosses, 4 liverworts, 1 lichen and 2 algae. Protected=1999 Flora Protection Order; (protected)= formerly protected by 1987 Order; {protected}= formerly protected by 1980 Order; (NI)= protected in Northern Ireland only. EXTINCT (9) Pheasant's-eye Adonis annua -- Corncockle Agrostemma githago Cogal Corn Chamomile Anthemis arvensis Fíogadán goirt Purple Spurge Euphorbia peplis Spuirse dhearg Sea Stock Matthiola sinuata Tonóg chladaigh
    [Show full text]
  • “Dynamic Speciation Processes in the Mediterranean Orchid Genus Ophrys L
    “DYNAMIC SPECIATION PROCESSES IN THE MEDITERRANEAN ORCHID GENUS OPHRYS L. (ORCHIDACEAE)” Tesi di Dottorato in Biologia Avanzata, XXIV ciclo (Indirizzo Sistematica Molecolare) Universitá degli Studi di Napoli Federico II Facoltá di Scienze Matematiche, Fisiche e Naturali Dipartimento di Biologia Strutturale e Funzionale 1st supervisor: Prof. Salvatore Cozzolino 2nd supervisor: Prof. Serena Aceto PhD student: Dott. Hendrik Breitkopf 1 Cover picture: Pseudo-copulation of a Colletes cunicularius male on a flower of Ophrys exaltata ssp. archipelagi (Marina di Lesina, Italy. H. Breitkopf, 2011). 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS GENERAL INTRODUCTION CHAPTER 1: MULTI-LOCUS NUCLEAR GENE PHYLOGENY OF THE SEXUALLY DECEPTIVE ORCHID GENUS OPHRYS L. (ORCHIDACEAE) CHAPTER 2: ANALYSIS OF VARIATION AND SPECIATION IN THE OPHRYS SPHEGODES SPECIES COMPLEX CHAPTER 3: FLORAL ISOLATION IS THE MAIN REPRODUCTIVE BARRIER AMONG CLOSELY RELATED SEXUALLY DECEPTIVE ORCHIDS CHAPTER 4: SPECIATION BY DISTURBANCE: A POPULATION STUDY OF CENTRAL ITALIAN OPHRYS SPHEGODES LINEAGES CONTRIBUTION OF CO-AUTHORS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 3 GENERAL INTRODUCTION ORCHIDS With more than 22.000 accepted species in 880 genera (Pridgeon et al. 1999), the family of the Orchidaceae is the largest family of angiosperm plants. Recently discovered fossils document their existence for at least 15 Ma. The last common ancestor of all orchids has been estimated to exist about 80 Ma ago (Ramirez et al. 2007, Gustafsson et al. 2010). Orchids are cosmopolitan, distributed on all continents and a great variety of habitats, ranging from deserts and swamps to arctic regions. Two large groups can be distinguished: Epiphytic and epilithic orchids attach themselves with aerial roots to trees or stones, mostly halfway between the ground and the upper canopy where they absorb water through the velamen of their roots.
    [Show full text]
  • Butterflies (Lepidoptera: Hesperioidea, Papilionoidea) of the Kampinos National Park and Its Buffer Zone
    Fr a g m e n t a Fa u n ist ic a 51 (2): 107-118, 2008 PL ISSN 0015-9301 O M u seu m a n d I n s t i t u t e o f Z o o l o g y PAS Butterflies (Lepidoptera: Hesperioidea, Papilionoidea) of the Kampinos National Park and its buffer zone Izabela DZIEKAŃSKA* and M arcin SlELEZNlEW** * Department o f Applied Entomology, Warsaw University of Life Sciences, Nowoursynowska 159, 02-776, Warszawa, Poland; e-mail: e-mail: [email protected] **Department o f Invertebrate Zoology, Institute o f Biology, University o f Białystok, Świerkowa 2OB, 15-950 Białystok, Poland; e-mail: [email protected] Abstract: Kampinos National Park is the second largest protected area in Poland and therefore a potentially important stronghold for biodiversity in the Mazovia region. However it has been abandoned as an area of lepidopterological studies for a long time. A total number of 80 butterfly species were recorded during inventory studies (2005-2008), which proved the occurrence of 80 species (81.6% of species recorded in the Mazovia voivodeship and about half of Polish fauna), including 7 from the European Red Data Book and 15 from the national red list (8 protected by law). Several xerothermophilous species have probably become extinct in the last few decadesColias ( myrmidone, Pseudophilotes vicrama, Melitaea aurelia, Hipparchia statilinus, H. alcyone), or are endangered in the KNP and in the region (e.g. Maculinea arion, Melitaea didyma), due to afforestation and spontaneous succession. Higrophilous butterflies have generally suffered less from recent changes in land use, but action to stop the deterioration of their habitats is urgently needed.
    [Show full text]
  • WETLAND PLANTS – Full Species List (English) RECORDING FORM
    WETLAND PLANTS – full species list (English) RECORDING FORM Surveyor Name(s) Pond name Date e.g. John Smith (if known) Square: 4 fig grid reference Pond: 8 fig grid ref e.g. SP1243 (see your map) e.g. SP 1235 4325 (see your map) METHOD: wetland plants (full species list) survey Survey a single Focal Pond in each 1km square Aim: To assess pond quality and conservation value using plants, by recording all wetland plant species present within the pond’s outer boundary. How: Identify the outer boundary of the pond. This is the ‘line’ marking the pond’s highest yearly water levels (usually in early spring). It will probably not be the current water level of the pond, but should be evident from the extent of wetland vegetation (for example a ring of rushes growing at the pond’s outer edge), or other clues such as water-line marks on tree trunks or stones. Within the outer boundary, search all the dry and shallow areas of the pond that are accessible. Survey deeper areas with a net or grapnel hook. Record wetland plants found by crossing through the names on this sheet. You don’t need to record terrestrial species. For each species record its approximate abundance as a percentage of the pond’s surface area. Where few plants are present, record as ‘<1%’. If you are not completely confident in your species identification put’?’ by the species name. If you are really unsure put ‘??’. After your survey please enter the results online: www.freshwaterhabitats.org.uk/projects/waternet/ Aquatic plants (submerged-leaved species) Stonewort, Bristly (Chara hispida) Bistort, Amphibious (Persicaria amphibia) Arrowhead (Sagittaria sagittifolia) Stonewort, Clustered (Tolypella glomerata) Crystalwort, Channelled (Riccia canaliculata) Arrowhead, Canadian (Sagittaria rigida) Stonewort, Common (Chara vulgaris) Crystalwort, Lizard (Riccia bifurca) Arrowhead, Narrow-leaved (Sagittaria subulata) Stonewort, Convergent (Chara connivens) Duckweed , non-native sp.
    [Show full text]
  • Maquetación 1
    About IUCN IUCN is a membership Union composed of both government and civil society organisations. It harnesses the experience, resources and reach of its 1,300 Member organisations and the input of some 15,000 experts. IUCN is the global authority on the status of the natural world and the measures needed to safeguard it. www.iucn.org https://twitter.com/IUCN/ IUCN – The Species Survival Commission The Species Survival Commission (SSC) is the largest of IUCN’s six volunteer commissions with a global membership of more than 10,000 experts. SSC advises IUCN and its members on the wide range of technical and scientific aspects of species conservation and is dedicated to securing a future for biodiversity. SSC has significant input into the international agreements dealing with biodiversity conservation. http://www.iucn.org/theme/species/about/species-survival-commission-ssc IUCN – Global Species Programme The IUCN Species Programme supports the activities of the IUCN Species Survival Commission and individual Specialist Groups, as well as implementing global species conservation initiatives. It is an integral part of the IUCN Secretariat and is managed from IUCN’s international headquarters in Gland, Switzerland. The Species Programme includes a number of technical units covering Species Trade and Use, the IUCN Red List Unit, Freshwater Biodiversity Unit (all located in Cambridge, UK), the Global Biodiversity Assessment Initiative (located in Washington DC, USA), and the Marine Biodiversity Unit (located in Norfolk, Virginia, USA). www.iucn.org/species IUCN – Centre for Mediterranean Cooperation The Centre was opened in October 2001 with the core support of the Spanish Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Environment, the regional Government of Junta de Andalucía and the Spanish Agency for International Development Cooperation (AECID).
    [Show full text]
  • Poleward Shifts in Geographical Ranges of Butterfly Species Associated with Regional Warming
    letters to nature between 270 and 4,000 ms after target onset) and to ignore changes in the distractor. Failure to respond within a reaction-time window, responding to a change in the distractor or deviating the gaze (monitored with a scleral search Poleward shifts in coil) by more than 1Њ from the fixation point caused the trial to be aborted without reward. The change in the target and distractors was selected so as to geographical ranges of be challenging for the animal. In experiments 1 and 2 the animal correctly completed, on average, 79% of the trials, broke fixation in 11%, might have butterfly species associated responded to the distractor stimulus in 6% and responded too early or not at all in 5% of the trials. In Experiment 3 the corresponding values are 78, 13%, 8% with regional warming and 2%. In none of the three experiments was there a difference between the Camille Parmesan*†, Nils Ryrholm‡, Constantı´ Stefanescu§, performances for the two possible targets. Differences between average eye Jane K. Hillk, Chris D. Thomas¶, Henri Descimon#, positions during trials where one or the other stimulus was the target were Brian Huntleyk, Lauri Kaila!, Jaakko Kullberg!, very small, with only an average shift of 0.02Њ in the direction of the shift of Toomas Tammaru**, W. John Tennent††, position between the stimuli. Only correctly completed trials were considered. Jeremy A. Thomas‡‡ & Martin Warren§§ Firing rates were determined by computing the average neuronal response * National Center for Ecological Analysis and Synthesis, 735 State Street, across trials for 1,000 ms starting 200 ms after the beginning of the target Suite 300, Santa Barbara, California 93101, USA stimulus movement.
    [Show full text]
  • Nota Lepidopterologica
    ©Societas Europaea Lepidopterologica; download unter http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/ und www.zobodat.at Nota lepid. 23 (2): 1 19-140; 01.VIL2000 ISSN 0342-7536 Comparative data on the adult biology, ecology and behaviour of species belonging to the genera Hipparchia, Chazara and Kanetisa in central Spain (Nymphalidae: Satyrinae) Enrique Garcia-Barros Department of Biology (Zoology), Universidad Autönoma de Madrid, E-28049 Madrid, Spain, e-mail: [email protected] Summary. The potential longevity, fecundity, mating frequencies, behaviour, and sea- sonal reproductive biology were studied in several satyrine butterflies belonging to the genera Hipparchia, Chazara and Kanetisa, in an area located in central Spain. All the species studied appear to be potentially long-lived, and a relatively long period of pre- oviposition is shown to occur in C. briseis and K. circe. Potential fecundity varies between 250 and 800 eggs depending on the species (with maxima exceeding 1300 eggs in K. circe). The results are discussed in terms of the possible ecological relationships between adult ecological traits and the species abundance, and the possibility of a marked geographic variation between species, that might be of interest in relation to specific management and conservation. Zusammenfassung. Für mehrere Vertreter der Gattungen Hipparchia, Chazara und Kanetisa (Satyrinae) wurden in einem Gebiet in Zentralspanien potentielle Lebensdauer, potentielle Fekundität, Paarungshäufigkeiten im Freiland und saisonaler Verlauf der Reproduktionstätigkeit untersucht. Alle untersuchten Arten sind potentiell langlebig, eine relativ lange Präovipositionsperiode tritt bei C. briseis und K circe auf. Die potentielle Fekundität variiert je nach Art zwischen 250 und 800 Eiern (mit einem Maximum von über 1300 Eiern bei K circe).
    [Show full text]
  • Orchid Observers
    Phenology of UK Plants Orchids and Zooniverse Mark Spencer & Kath Castillo Department of Life Sciences Natural History Museum Agrimonia eupatoria Robbirt & al. 2011 and UK specimens of Ophrys sphegodes Mill NHM Origins and Evolution Initiative: UK Phenology Project • 20,000 herbarium sheets imaged and transcribed • Volunteer contributed taxonomic revision, morphometric and plant/insect pollinator data compiled • Extension of volunteer work to extract additional phenology data from other UK museums and botanic gardens • 7,000 herbarium sheets curated and mounted • Collaboration with BSBI/Herbaria@Home • Preliminary analyses of orchid phenology underway Robbirt & al. (2011) . Validation of biological collections as a source of phenological data for use in climate change studies: a case study with the orchid Ophrys sphegodes. J. Ecol. Brooks, Self, Toloni & Sparks (2014). Natural history museum collections provide information on phenological change in British butterflies since the late-nineteenth century. Int. J. Biometeorol. Johnson & al. (2011) Climate Change and Biosphere Response: Unlocking the Collections Vault. Bioscience. Specimens of Gymnadenia conopsea (L.) R.Br Orchid Observers Phenology of UK Plants Orchids and Zooniverse Mark Spencer & Kath Castillo Department of Life Sciences Natural History Museum 56 species of wild orchid in the UK 29 taxa selected for this study Anacamptis morio Anacamptis pyramidalis Cephalanthera damasonium Coeloglossum viride Corallorhiza trifida Dactylorhiza fuchsii Dactylorhiza incarnata Dactylorhiza maculata Dactylorhiza praetermissa Dactylorhiza purpurella Epipactis palustris Goodyera repens Gymnadenia borealis Gymnadenia conopsea Gymnadenia densiflora Hammarbya paludosa Herminium monorchis Neotinea ustulata Neottia cordata Neottia nidus-avis Neottia ovata Ophrys apifera Ophrys insectifera Orchis anthropophora Orchis mascula Platanthera bifolia Platanthera chlorantha Pseudorchis albida Spiranthes spiralis Fly orchid (Ophrys insectifera) Participants: 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Augu Sugu Socioloģisko Grupu Ekoloģija Un Ģeogrāfija Latvijas
    M. Laiviņš et al. Augu sugu socioloģisko grupu ekoloģija un ģeogrāfija Augu sugu socioloģisko grupu ekoloģija un ģeogrāfija Latvijas skujkoku mežos Ecology and Geography of the Plant Species Sociological Groups in Needle-Leaved Forests of Latvia Māris Laiviņš, Baiba Bambe Latvijas Valsts Mežzinātnes institūts „Silava” Latvian State Forestry Research Institute „Silava” e-mail: [email protected]; [email protected] Solvita Rūsiņa, Dace Piliksere Latvijas Universitātes Ģeogrāfijas un Zemes zinātņu fakultāte Faculty of Geography and Earth sciences, University of Latvia e-mail: [email protected]; [email protected] Vija Kreile Teiču Dabas rezervāta administrācija The Administration of Teichi Nature Reserve e-mail: [email protected] Abstract. On the basis of 2332 vegetation relevés, 30 sociological species groups were developed for Latvian needle-leaved forests. All vascular plant, moss and lichen species were used in analysis. Phi coefficient (Φ) was used as a fidelity measure for calculation of sociological groups, and the threshold value was setΦ > 45.0. All 30 sociological groups were divided into three clusters according to their phytosociological characterization: 10 stable (constant) groups, 13 quasistable (semi-constant), and 7 serial groups. Analysis of Ellenberg indicator values revealed that the most important environmental factors explaining differences in species composition among groups are soil fertility (Ellenberg nitrogen value) and climate continentality (Ellenberg continentality value). Analysis of distribution of sociological species groups into different syntaxa confirmed that Latvian needle-leaved forest plant communities belong to three forest vegetation classes of Eurosiberian boreonemoral zone: Vaccinio-Piceetea, Pulsatillo-Pinetea, and Querco-Fagetea. Key words: needle-leaved forests, sociological group, dynamic categories, Latvia.
    [Show full text]