Herein Are Privately Owned and May Not Be Reproduced in Full Or in Part Without Their Owners’ Permission
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
A Cultural Heritage Research Services, Inc. Publication 2008 Funded by the Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission CHRS, Inc. archaeologists conduct Phase III fieldwork on the Shaw Site in August 2004. Seeking Searights and Shaws Archaeological Investigations of Two National Road-Era Sites in Fayette County, Pennsylvania This copyright-free publication was produced by Cultural Heritage Research Services, Inc. (CHRS) in 2008 for the Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission as one of several measures designed to mitigate effects of the Commission’s Mon/Fayette Expressway, Uniontown to Brownsville Project, on cultural resources. While the publication as a whole is in the public domain, the historic photographs employed herein are privately owned and may not be reproduced in full or in part without their owners’ permission. Principal author: Philip Ruth, Director of Research, CHRS, Inc. Contributing author: Kenneth J. Basalik, Ph.D., President, CHRS, Inc. CONTENTS Introduction Why Archaeology, and Why Here? 1 CHAPTER ONE What Documents Disclosed 9 The Searight Tavern: Fixture on the National Road 10 The Shaw Family: From Searights to Obscurity 25 CHAPTER TWO What the Ground Divulged 39 Testing the Searight Tavern Site 40 Testing the Shaw Site 47 CHAPTER THREE Making Connections 53 The Searight Tavern Through Time 54 Eras in the Shaw Site’s Evolution 63 Strands in a Chronological Chord A Select List of Redletter Dates in the Intertwined Histories of the National Road, the Searight Tavern, and the Shaw Property 71 For Further Reading and Research 74 CHRS, Inc. archaeologists excavate test units at the Shaw Site in May 2004. INTRODUCTION Why Archaeology, and Why Here? f you’re like most Americans, you have a good Even with this awareness and appreciation, Isense of what archaeologists do, and why they people can be startled to find an archaeological do it. Poll results published in 2000 revealed investigation underway in their own “backyard.” that “Americans correctly view archaeologists’ Americans tend to regard archaeology as activity work as digging, excavating, finding, analyzing, performed in exotic locales. In reality, hundreds researching, studying, documenting, and, more of archaeological investigations are conducted specifically, analyzing and researching the past to across the United States every year. A few are discover and learn what life and past civilizations high-profile operations overseen by historical were like.”* Not that there aren’t a few miscon- organizations and duly covered by the media. The ceptions floating around. You might be surprised vast majority, however, are relatively brief investi- to learn, for instance, that archaeologists do not gations necessitated by federal, state, and/or local study rocks and stones (that’s the domain of laws designed to preserve the nation’s archaeolog- geologists), nor are they experts on fossils and ical heritage. “Digs” of the latter variety are part dinosaurs (that’s paleontology’s province). And of a protocol of environmental clearance some- any archaeologist will tell you that the glamorous times referred to as “the Section 106 process.” picture of archaeological adventure and romance painted by Hollywood bears little resemblance to The Section 106 process the painstaking and quiet endeavors that fill their days—meticulously moving dirt, cleaning and The National Historic Preservation Act of labeling artifacts, entering data in computers, por- 1966 is the cornerstone of American cultural ing through tables of data. resource preservation policy. Amended and Poll results also indicate that most Americans strengthened several times since 1966, this law es- believe archaeology is worth the effort. There is tablished the National Register of Historic Places, a general perception that archaeology can help us the office and duties of state historic preservation improve the future by increasing our understand- officers (SHPOs), a program of grants-in-aid to ing of both the past and the present. People rec- enable SHPOs to conduct their work, the Certi- ognize that archaeological artifacts and sites can fied Local Government program to identify com- have aesthetic value, spiritual worth, and historical munities that meet certain preservation standards, significance for populations and individuals. For federal agency responsibilities concerning historic these reasons, the majority of Americans sup- preservation activities, and the Advisory Council port legislation designed to protect and preserve on Historic Preservation. This legislation was fol- archaeological resources. lowed in 1969 by passage of the National Envi- ronmental Policy Act, requiring federal agencies to prepare impact statements for undertakings *Exploring Public Perceptions and Attitudes about Archaeology, Harris that might have an effect on environmental qual- Interactive Poll, February 2000. ity (cultural resources being contributing elements 1 A map drafted in October 2006 depicts the central section of the Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission’s Mon/Fayette Expressway, Uniontown-to-Brownsville Project. Location markers for the Searight Tavern Site and the Shaw Site in western Menallen Township have been added. to environmental quality). Yet another law with tion officer—the Pennsylvania Historical and Mu- far-reaching implications—the Archaeological seum Commission (PHMC), Bureau of Historic and Historical Preservation Act—was passed in Preservation—has also published guidelines 1974. This legislation extended the protections designed to promote consistency and efficiency established by the Reservoir Salvage Act of 1960 in the treatment of cultural resources across the to all federally funded, licensed, or aided under- Commonwealth. These directives include 1991’s takings where scientific, historical, or archaeologi- “Cultural Resource Management in Pennsylvania: cal data might be impacted. Guidelines for Archaeological Survey and Mitiga- The unofficial but commonly employed term tion.” “Section 106 process” derives from the section of the National Historic Preservation Act re- A “Mon/Fayette Expressway” quiring federal agencies to take into account the effects of their undertakings or licensing activities The Section 106 process was among the many on historic properties, while giving the Advisory considerations of the Pennsylvania Turnpike Council on Historic Preservation an opportunity Commission (PTC) when it launched a series of to review and comment on the potential effects transportation projects in southwestern Penn- of these activities. The Advisory Council has sylvania’s Mon-Fayette region in the early 1990s. defined the procedure for satisfying Section 106 The PTC was responding to the Pennsylvania requirements in a set of regulations titled “Pro- General Assembly’s recent passage of two pieces tection of Historic Properties.” of legislation: Act 61 of 1985, which directed Given Pennsylvania’s rich heritage, it should the PTC to design, construct, and operate several come as no surprise that the State Legislature new toll roads in the Commonwealth; and Act has enacted laws aimed at further protecting 26 of 1991, which added to the list of proposed the Commonwealth’s archaeological resources, toll roads, and established a continuous source of whether or not they are imperiled by federally state funding to help the PTC advance its expan- funded, licensed, or aided undertakings. The sion projects. Among the highways conceived lynchpin of this regulatory effort is Act No. at this time was a “Mon/Fayette system [that] 1978-273, amended as Act No. 1988-72, which will extend approximately 70 miles south from requires that State-funded undertakings be sub- Pittsburgh through the Monongahela River Valley jected to the same Section 106 process as federal- and western Fayette County to Interstate 68 near ly-funded projects. The State’s historic preserva- Morgantown, W.V.,” according to a PTC press 2 release. The toll road was expected to “improve tage Research Services, Inc. (CHRS) of North access to redevelopment sites in the economi- Wales, Pennsylvania, was charged with investigat- cally depressed Mon River towns where the steel ing and evaluating historic structures and historic and coal industries once flourished, [and] provide archaeological resources within the project area faster and safer travel options for through traffic, (for Section 106 purposes, all above-ground particularly commercial vehicles that now use ex- structures and archaeological resources at least 50 isting north-south arteries, such as PA Route 51, years of age are considered “historic”; archaeo- PA Route 88, PA Route 837, and PA Route 857, logical resources predating the arrival of Europe- as well as U.S. Route 40 (the National Road).” ans in America are classified as “prehistoric” or The new “Mon/Fayette Expressway” sys- “precontact”). tem would be constructed in four independent CHRS’s initial task was to prepare a Historical projects, one of which would result in a 17-mile Context laying out a methodology and historical stretch of toll road connecting Uniontown with framework for identifying and assessing historic Brownsville. That particular section was intended cultural resources within the project area. The “to provide for safer and more efficient vehicu- resulting report—titled Mon/Fayette Transportation lar travel by improving access, addressing future Project Allegheny, Fayette, and Washington Counties, capacity requirements and drawing traffic (espe- Pennsylvania, and Monongalia County, West Vir- cially trucks) off U.S. Route 40 and