DOCSLIB.ORG

Importing and Keeping Introduced Animals in Western Australia Technical Bulletin 4848 February 2019

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Importing and Keeping Introduced Animals in Western Australia Technical Bulletin 4848 February 2019 Importing and keeping introduced animals in Western Australia Technical bulletin 4848 February 2019 ISSN 1039–7205 Author Win Kirkpatrick Biosecurity Invasive Species Recommended reference Kirkpatrick, W. E. 2019, Importing and keeping introduced animals in Western Australia, Invasive Species Technical Bulletin, Department of Primary Industries and Regional Development, Perth. Copies of this document are available in alternative formats upon request. 3 Baron-Hay Court, South Perth WA 6151 Tel: (08) 9368 3333 Email: [email protected] Website: dpird.wa.gov.au Important disclaimer The Chief Executive Officer of the Department of Primary Industries and Regional Development and the State of Western Australia accept no liability whatsoever by reason of negligence or otherwise arising from the use or release of this information or any part of it. Copyright © Western Australian Agriculture Authority, 2019 Contents Important disclaimer .................................................................................................. ii 1 Management of introduced animals ........................................................... 1 2 Western Australian organism list (WAOL) ................................................. 1 2.1 Directions for using WAOL ............................................................................ 1 3 Keeping categories ...................................................................................... 2 3.1 Prohibited keeping category .......................................................................... 2 3.2 Restricted keeping category .......................................................................... 2 3.3 Exempt keeping category .............................................................................. 3 4 Assessment .................................................................................................. 3 5 Permit applications ...................................................................................... 3 6 Permit conditions ......................................................................................... 4 7 Unwanted animals ........................................................................................ 4 8 Keeping introduced animals ....................................................................... 4 8.1 Permits and fees for restricted keeping birds ................................................. 4 8.2 Exempt keeping ............................................................................................. 5 8.3 Import and keeping requirements for animals ................................................ 5 8.4 Quarantine requirements ............................................................................... 6 8.5 Enclosure requirements ................................................................................. 6 9 Introduced animal lists ................................................................................ 7 9.1 Restricted keeping birds by scientific name ................................................... 7 9.2 Restricted keeping birds by common name ................................................. 12 9.3 Restricted keeping mammals ...................................................................... 18 9.4 Exempt keeping birds .................................................................................. 18 9.5 Exempt keeping mammals .......................................................................... 20 10 Contact information ................................................................................... 22 11 References .................................................................................................. 22 i (page intentionally left blank) 1 Management of introduced animals When mammals, birds, reptiles and amphibians are introduced to new locations they can cause problems to agriculture, the environment and the community. Problems can occur because animals often; carry diseases or parasites damage agricultural crops displace native animals and plants damage property cause land degradation have a negative impact on pets. Sometimes it is not obvious to us of the possible effects captive kept animals can have when a population establishes in the wild. The cost to future generations as a result of importing and keeping a prohibited animal or by not keeping permitted animals responsibly can be enormous. It can take a long time for escaped animals to reach pest proportions, but once populations establish in the wild they are usually impossible to eradicate. Primarily introduced species have been declared by the Minister for Agriculture and Food, Western Australia as either prohibited organisms or permitted organisms under the Biosecurity and Agriculture Management Act 2007 (BAM Act). Animal species that are declared prohibited under the BAM Act require an import permit from DPIRD to enter WA. 2 Western Australian organism list (WAOL) WAOL is an online database recording all BAM Act declared organisms - animals, plants, and pathogens in Western Australia (WA). The following information is available in WAOL; declaration status (section 11 permitted organism; section 12 prohibited organism; section 22(2) declared pest) control category (C1 exclusion; C2 eradication; C3 management) keeping category (prohibited; restricted; exempt) requirement for import permit quarantine conditions. 2.1 Directions for using WAOL To query or search the WAOL enter the organism’s scientific or common name. It is recommended to search by scientific name as this will provide the species record, whereas using a common name will provide records for any plant, animal and pathogen containing your search term. Search the WA Organism List (WAOL) database. 1 3 Keeping categories The Biosecurity and Agriculture Management Regulations 2013 specify prohibited and restricted keeping categories for the purposes of regulating declared terrestrial vertebrates (mammals, birds, reptiles and amphibians) in regard to the purposes for which they can be kept, and the entities that can keep them for that purpose. A keeping permit (or licence) is the administrative tool used to assign specific conditions to the keeping of an animal. The tables in this bulletin are provided primarily to assist readers to determine the legal restrictions applicable to declared animals. The tables are not exhaustive and do not necessarily set out all restrictions applicable to a particular species under the BAM Act and regulations or other legislation. The tables list those animals that can be kept under a permit or license in aviculture, as pets or companion animals or as stock animals. Some other animals that don’t require a permit to keep but have other requirements are also listed. Any species not listed can be looked up searching the WAOL. All animals native or indigenous to WA are regulated under the Biodiversity Conservation Act 2016, replacing the Wildlife Conservation Act 1950, administered by the Department of Biodiversity, Conservation and Attractions (DBCA). It is important to note that under the BAM Act, all Australian native animals are prohibited organisms unless they are indigenous or native to WA. Only animals native to WA (listed by the Western Australian Museum) are permitted organisms under the act. The WA native animals listed in this bulletin are declared pests under the BAM Act but they also continue to be regulated by DBCA and protected under the Biodiversity Conservation Act (BC Act). People who keep animals without the appropriate permit/license or who do not comply with the conditions of a permit/license can be prosecuted and may forfeit their animals. Please be responsible and legal, obtain a permit before your acquire a declared animal and follow conditions of the permit/license. If you are unsure of the legal requirements and restrictions applicable to a species, please contact DPIRD or DBCA (refer to section 10 for contact information). 3.1 Prohibited keeping category Animals regulated in a prohibited keeping category are prohibited organisms and can only be kept under a permit for public display and education purposes, and/or genuine scientific research, by entities approved by the State authority. Species in this category are considered to pose a risk to the biosecurity of WA, and cannot be kept by private individuals. An import permit must be obtained from DPIRD prior to prohibited species entering WA. 3.2 Restricted keeping category Animals which are considered as a species, to pose a lower biosecurity risk for the environment, primary industry or public safety, and can be kept under a permit by private individuals. The majority of species regulated as restricted keeping are also prohibited organisms and require an import permit from DPIRD prior to entering WA. 2 3.3 Exempt keeping category Animals regulated as exempt do not require a permit to keep, however there may be other requirements under the BAM Act. Such as those for the import of livestock, pigeons and doves, or waybills for stock movement, or animals regulated under the Biodiversity and Conservation Act. 4 Assessment Before mammal, bird, reptile and amphibian species new to WA can be imported, an assessment must be carried out to determine potential threats to agriculture and the environment. New species are determined as those not listed in WAOL. The assessment considers the risk of a species establishing a population in the wild and its pest potential. A charge may apply for completion of an assessment, please see Invasive Species
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 2007 Birds in a Changing Climate
    T HE S TATE OF A USTRALIA ’ S B IRDS 2 0 0 7 Birds in a Changing Climate Compiled by Penny Olsen Supplement to Wingspan, vol. 14, no. 4, December 2007 2 The State of Australia’s Birds 2007 The State of Australia’s Birds 2007 3 The term climate change is commonly used to refer to shifts in modern climate, including the rise in average surface temperature known as global warming or the enhanced greenhouse effect. We use it here to refer to anthropogenic climate change, under the presumption that it is overwhelmingly caused by humans and hence has potential to largely be stabilised or reversed. The State of Australia’s Birds report series presents an overview of the status of the nation’s birds, the major threats they face and the conservation actions needed. This fifth annual report focuses on climate change. The climate is always changing and birds respond by adapting and evolving. However, at least since the very early 1900s the surface temperature of the earth has been warming at a rate unprecedented in human history, bringing with it shifts in local, regional and global weather systems. The vast majority of scientists agree that this is almost all attributable to the release of excessive amounts of greenhouse gases through human activity, particularly the use of fossil fuels and deforestation. Australia has warmed by 0.9 ° C since 1900, most rapidly since 1950, and is expected to warm a further 1 ° C over the next two decades. Signs of this change are already reflected in the distribution and abundance of some of our birds and in the timing of their breeding and migration, in line with changes observed in other biota.
    [Show full text]
  • Rare Birds in Iran in the Late 1960S and 1970S
    Podoces, 2008, 3(1/2): 1–30 Rare Birds in Iran in the Late 1960s and 1970s DEREK A. SCOTT Castletownbere Post Office, Castletownbere, Co. Cork, Ireland. Email: [email protected] Received 26 July 2008; accepted 14 September 2008 Abstract: The 12-year period from 1967 to 1978 was a period of intense ornithological activity in Iran. The Ornithology Unit in the Department of the Environment carried out numerous surveys throughout the country; several important international ornithological expeditions visited Iran and subsequently published their findings, and a number of resident and visiting bird-watchers kept detailed records of their observations and submitted these to the Ornithology Unit. These activities added greatly to our knowledge of the status and distribution of birds in Iran, and produced many records of birds which had rarely if ever been recorded in Iran before. This paper gives details of all records known to the author of 92 species that were recorded as rarities in Iran during the 12-year period under review. These include 18 species that had not previously been recorded in Iran, a further 67 species that were recorded on fewer than 13 occasions, and seven slightly commoner species for which there were very few records prior to 1967. All records of four distinctive subspecies are also included. The 29 species that were known from Iran prior to 1967 but not recorded during the period under review are listed in an Appendix. Keywords: Rare birds, rarities, 1970s, status, distribution, Iran. INTRODUCTION Eftekhar, E. Kahrom and J. Mansoori, several of whom quickly became keen ornithologists.
    [Show full text]
  • Editorial Submitting an Article
    Journal of Natural Science Collections 2015: Volume 2 Editorial Welcome to the second Volume of the Journal The articles presented here aim to provide guid- of Natural Science Collections : a Journal for ance for working with natural science collec- you who work with natural science collections tions. If colleagues are wanting to undertake everyday. I hope that the articles in this Volume specific conservation work on areas in their prove to be interesting, and useful for all. collection, and are unsure as where to begin, please do contact one of the NatSCA commit- There are a large variety of topics covered in tee who will be able to advise. this Volume. The first article examines proto- cols for destructive sampling in natural history All the articles from Volume 1 are now available specimens, providing a nice case study and for free to view on the NatSCA website destructive sampling forms for researchers that (www.natsca.org). Please also have a look at can be adapted for your own institution. A pa- the NatSCA blog, which has more informal write per examines the fascinating natural history ups of views, book reviews and conferences displays of old and new, with surprising results. (http://naturalsciencecollections.wordpress.com/). An interesting article can assist with the mu- seum curators decision to lend specimens for I am very excited about the NatSCA 2015 con- research, where the article examines whether ference and AGM. The theme is all about how Micro-CT scanning affects DNA in specimens. we use traditional and social media to talk Conservators share their methods of cleaning a about our collections.
    [Show full text]
  • RATES of KARYOTYPIC EVOLUTION in ESTRILDID FINCHES DIFFER BETWEEN 4 ISLAND and CONTINENTAL CLADES 5 6 Daniel M
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/013987; this version posted January 19, 2015. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. 1 1 2 3 RATES OF KARYOTYPIC EVOLUTION IN ESTRILDID FINCHES DIFFER BETWEEN 4 ISLAND AND CONTINENTAL CLADES 5 6 Daniel M. Hooper1,2 and Trevor D. Price3 7 8 1Commitee on Evolutionary Biology, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60637 9 2 E-mail: [email protected] 10 3Department of Ecology and Evolution, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60637 11 12 13 Sunday, January 18, 2015 14 15 16 Running head: Chromosome inversions in finches 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/013987; this version posted January 19, 2015. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. 2 35 Reasons why chromosomal rearrangements spread to fixation and frequently distinguish 36 related taxa remain poorly understood. We used cytological descriptions of karyotype to 37 identify large pericentric inversions between species of Estrildid finches (family 38 Estrildidae) and a time-dated phylogeny to assess the genomic, geographic, and 39 phylogenetic context of karyotype evolution in this group.
    [Show full text]
  • The Birds (Aves) of Oromia, Ethiopia – an Annotated Checklist
    European Journal of Taxonomy 306: 1–69 ISSN 2118-9773 https://doi.org/10.5852/ejt.2017.306 www.europeanjournaloftaxonomy.eu 2017 · Gedeon K. et al. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License. Monograph urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:A32EAE51-9051-458A-81DD-8EA921901CDC The birds (Aves) of Oromia, Ethiopia – an annotated checklist Kai GEDEON 1,*, Chemere ZEWDIE 2 & Till TÖPFER 3 1 Saxon Ornithologists’ Society, P.O. Box 1129, 09331 Hohenstein-Ernstthal, Germany. 2 Oromia Forest and Wildlife Enterprise, P.O. Box 1075, Debre Zeit, Ethiopia. 3 Zoological Research Museum Alexander Koenig, Centre for Taxonomy and Evolutionary Research, Adenauerallee 160, 53113 Bonn, Germany. * Corresponding author: [email protected] 2 Email: [email protected] 3 Email: [email protected] 1 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:F46B3F50-41E2-4629-9951-778F69A5BBA2 2 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:F59FEDB3-627A-4D52-A6CB-4F26846C0FC5 3 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:A87BE9B4-8FC6-4E11-8DB4-BDBB3CFBBEAA Abstract. Oromia is the largest National Regional State of Ethiopia. Here we present the first comprehensive checklist of its birds. A total of 804 bird species has been recorded, 601 of them confirmed (443) or assumed (158) to be breeding birds. At least 561 are all-year residents (and 31 more potentially so), at least 73 are Afrotropical migrants and visitors (and 44 more potentially so), and 184 are Palaearctic migrants and visitors (and eight more potentially so). Three species are endemic to Oromia, 18 to Ethiopia and 43 to the Horn of Africa. 170 Oromia bird species are biome restricted: 57 to the Afrotropical Highlands biome, 95 to the Somali-Masai biome, and 18 to the Sudan-Guinea Savanna biome.
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogeography of Finches and Sparrows
    In: Animal Genetics ISBN: 978-1-60741-844-3 Editor: Leopold J. Rechi © 2009 Nova Science Publishers, Inc. Chapter 1 PHYLOGEOGRAPHY OF FINCHES AND SPARROWS Antonio Arnaiz-Villena*, Pablo Gomez-Prieto and Valentin Ruiz-del-Valle Department of Immunology, University Complutense, The Madrid Regional Blood Center, Madrid, Spain. ABSTRACT Fringillidae finches form a subfamily of songbirds (Passeriformes), which are presently distributed around the world. This subfamily includes canaries, goldfinches, greenfinches, rosefinches, and grosbeaks, among others. Molecular phylogenies obtained with mitochondrial DNA sequences show that these groups of finches are put together, but with some polytomies that have apparently evolved or radiated in parallel. The time of appearance on Earth of all studied groups is suggested to start after Middle Miocene Epoch, around 10 million years ago. Greenfinches (genus Carduelis) may have originated at Eurasian desert margins coming from Rhodopechys obsoleta (dessert finch) or an extinct pale plumage ancestor; it later acquired green plumage suitable for the greenfinch ecological niche, i.e.: woods. Multicolored Eurasian goldfinch (Carduelis carduelis) has a genetic extant ancestor, the green-feathered Carduelis citrinella (citril finch); this was thought to be a canary on phonotypical bases, but it is now included within goldfinches by our molecular genetics phylograms. Speciation events between citril finch and Eurasian goldfinch are related with the Mediterranean Messinian salinity crisis (5 million years ago). Linurgus olivaceus (oriole finch) is presently thriving in Equatorial Africa and was included in a separate genus (Linurgus) by itself on phenotypical bases. Our phylograms demonstrate that it is and old canary. Proposed genus Acanthis does not exist. Twite and linnet form a separate radiation from redpolls.
    [Show full text]
  • Top End Adventure 29Th August – 4Th September 2018
    Tracks Birding - Trip Report Top End: August - September 2018 Northern Territory: Top End Adventure 29th August – 4th September 2018 Do I need to say anything more? Gouldian Finch, bird of the trip. Tour Leader: Laurie Ross All photos in this report were taken by Laurie Ross @ Tracks Birding & Photography Tours www.tracksbirding.com.au 0476 110 084 [email protected] 1 Page Tracks Birding - Trip Report Top End: August - September 2018 INTRODUCTION Darwin and the Top End have to be the most under-rated places to bird on the planet and shouldn’t be overlooked by interstate or international birders. On this seven-day tour you have the opportunity to see over 200 species in a week and explore a huge variety of habitats. From the Mangroves, beaches and monsoon forests around Darwin city, world class wetlands like Fogg Dam and Mamukala, Adelaide River and South Alligator River Floodplains, the Sandstone Escarpments of Kakadu National Park to the Outback grassy plains of Victoria River and Timber Creek. Just some of the bird highlights include local endemics like Chestnut-quilled Rock-pigeon, Banded Fruit-dove, White- lined Honeyeater and the beautiful Hooded Parrot, rarities like Yellow-rumped Mannikin, Chestnut-backed Button-quail, Northern Shrike-tit and Red Goshawk and for the colorful bird fans, Purple-crowned Fairy-wren, Rainbow Pitta and of course the spectacular Gouldian Finch. ITINERARY; 29th August Darwin - Mary River Resort 30th August Mary River Resort - Jabiru (Kakadu National Park) 31st August Jabiru – Yellow Water – Pine Creek 1st September Pine Creek – Edith Falls – Katherine – Victoria River 2nd September Victoria River – Gregory National Park – Timber Creek 3rd September Timber Creek - Katherine 4th September Katherine – Darwin www.tracksbirding.com.au 0476 110 084 [email protected] 2 Page Tracks Birding - Trip Report Top End: August - September 2018 DAY 1 - 29th August 2018 After introductions we hit the road to start birding, first stop was Buffalo Creek.
    [Show full text]
  • Second Supplement to the American Ornithologists' Union Check-List of North American Birds
    A O U Check-listSupplement The Auk 117(3):847-858, 2000 FORTY-SECOND SUPPLEMENT TO THE AMERICAN ORNITHOLOGISTS' UNION CHECK-LIST OF NORTH AMERICAN BIRDS This first Supplementsince publication of the 7th Icterusprosthemelas, Lonchura cantans, and L. atricap- edition (1998)of the AOU Check-listof North American illa); (3) four speciesare changed(Caracara cheriway, Birdssummarizes changes made by the Committee Glaucidiumcostaricanum, Myrmotherula pacifica, Pica on Classification and Nomenclature between its re- hudsonia)and one added (Caracaralutosa) by splits constitutionin late 1998 and 31 January2000. Be- from now-extralimital forms; (4) four scientific causethe makeupof the Committeehas changed sig- namesof speciesare changedbecause of genericre- nificantly since publication of the 7th edition, it allocation (Ibycter americanus,Stercorarius skua, S. seemsappropriate to outline the way in which the maccormicki,Molothrus oryzivorus); (5) one specific currentCommittee operates. The philosophyof the name is changedfor nomenclaturalreasons (Baeolo- Committeeis to retain the presenttaxonomic or dis- phusridgwayi); (6) the spellingof five speciesnames tributional statusunless substantial and convincing is changedto make them gramaticallycorrect rela- evidenceis publishedthat a changeshould be made. tive to the genericname (Jacameropsaureus, Poecile The Committee maintains an extensiveagenda of atricapilla,P. hudsonica,P. cincta,Buarremon brunnein- potential actionitems, includingpossible taxonomic ucha);(7) oneEnglish name is changedto conformto
    [Show full text]
  • Kenyan Birding & Animal Safari Organized by Detroit Audubon and Silent Fliers of Kenya July 8Th to July 23Rd, 2019
    Kenyan Birding & Animal Safari Organized by Detroit Audubon and Silent Fliers of Kenya July 8th to July 23rd, 2019 Kenya is a global biodiversity “hotspot”; however, it is not only famous for extraordinary viewing of charismatic megafauna (like elephants, lions, rhinos, hippos, cheetahs, leopards, giraffes, etc.), but it is also world-renowned as a bird watcher’s paradise. Located in the Rift Valley of East Africa, Kenya hosts 1054 species of birds--60% of the entire African birdlife--which are distributed in the most varied of habitats, ranging from tropical savannah and dry volcanic- shaped valleys to freshwater and brackish lakes to montane and rain forests. When added to the amazing bird life, the beauty of the volcanic and lava- sculpted landscapes in combination with the incredible concentration of iconic megafauna, the experience is truly breathtaking--that the Africa of movies (“Out of Africa”), books (“Born Free”) and documentaries (“For the Love of Elephants”) is right here in East Africa’s Great Rift Valley with its unparalleled diversity of iconic wildlife and equatorially-located ecosystems. Kenya is truly the destination of choice for the birdwatcher and naturalist. Karibu (“Welcome to”) Kenya! 1 Itinerary: Day 1: Arrival in Nairobi. Our guide will meet you at the airport and transfer you to your hotel. Overnight stay in Nairobi. Day 2: After an early breakfast, we will embark on a full day exploration of Nairobi National Park--Kenya’s first National Park. This “urban park,” located adjacent to one of Africa’s most populous cities, allows for the possibility of seeing the following species of birds; Olivaceous and Willow Warbler, African Water Rail, Wood Sandpiper, Great Egret, Red-backed and Lesser Grey Shrike, Rosy-breasted and Pangani Longclaw, Yellow-crowned Bishop, Jackson’s Widowbird, Saddle-billed Stork, Cardinal Quelea, Black-crowned Night- heron, Martial Eagle and several species of Cisticolas, in addition to many other unique species.
    [Show full text]
  • Ethnomedicinal and Cultural Practices of Mammals and Birds in the Vicinity of River Chenab, Punjab-Pakistan
    Altaf et al. Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine (2017) 13:41 DOI 10.1186/s13002-017-0168-5 RESEARCH Open Access Ethnomedicinal and cultural practices of mammals and birds in the vicinity of river Chenab, Punjab-Pakistan Muhammad Altaf1*, Arshad Javid2, Muhammad Umair3, Khalid Javed Iqbal4, Zahid Rasheed5 and Arshad Mehmood Abbasi6* Abstract Background: Although, use of animal species in disease treatment and culture practices is as ancient as that of plant species; however ethnomedicinal uses and cultural values of animal species have rarely been reported. Present study is the first report on the medicinal uses of mammals and bird species in Pakistan. Methods: Questionnaires and semi-structured interviews were applied to collect qualitative and quantitative data from local informants (N = 109). Relative frequency of mention (RFM), fidelity level (FL), relative popularity level (RPL), similarity index (SI) and rank order priority (ROP) indices were used to analyzed the data. Results: One hundred and eight species of animals, which include: 83% birds and 17% mammals were documented. In total 30 mammalian and 28 birds’ species were used to treat various diseases such as rheumatic disorders, skin infections and sexual weakness among several others. Fats, flesh, blood, milk and eggs were the most commonly utilized body parts. Bos taurus, Bubalus bubalis, Capra aegagrus hircus, Felis domesticus, Lepus nigricollis dayanus and Ovis aries (mammals) and Anas platyrhynchos domesticus, Columba livia, Coturnix coturnix, Gallus gallus and Passer domesticus (birds) were the highly utilized species. Medicinal and cultural uses of 30% mammals and 46% birds were reported for the first time, whereas 33% mammals and 79% birds depicted zero similarity with previous reports.
    [Show full text]
  • Chewing Lice (Insecta: Phthiraptera) from Estrildid Finches (Aves
    Zootaxa 2714: 59–68 (2010) ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) www.mapress.com/zootaxa/ Article ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2010 · Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) Chewing lice (Insecta: Phthiraptera) from estrildid finches (Aves: Passeriformes: Estrildidae) and louse-flies (Insecta: Diptera: Hippoboscidae) from birds in Senegal, with descriptions of three new species of the genus Brueelia OLDŘICH SYCHRA1,3, IVAN LITERÁK1, TOMÁŠ NAJER1, MIROSLAV ČAPEK2, PETR KOUBEK2 & PETR PROCHÁZKA2 1Department of Biology and Wildlife Diseases, Faculty of Veterinary Hygiene and Ecology, University of Veterinary and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Palackého 1–3, 612 42 Brno, Czech Republic 2Institute of Vertebrate Biology Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, v.v.i., Květná 8, 603 65 Brno, Czech Republic 3Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected] Abstract Descriptions and illustrations are given for three new species of the genus Brueelia Kéler from estrildid finches (Estrildidae) from Senegal. They and their type hosts are: B. fasciata from Amadina fasciata, B. senegala from Lagonosticta senegala and B. cantans from Euodice cantans. Records of three other louse species of the genus Myrsidea Waterston from estrildid finches and records of louse-flies (Hippoboscidae) from birds in Senegal are also given. Key words: Brueelia, Chewing lice, Estrildidae, Hippoboscidae, louse-flies, Myrsidea, Passeriformes, Phthiraptera, Senegal Introduction The family Estrildidae comprising waxbills, munias and allies represents a relatively large family of passerine birds. About 141 species of these gregarious and often colonial seed-eaters are distributed in the Old World tropics and Australasia, of which 23 occur in Senegal (Fry & Keith 2004, Lepage 2009, according to taxonomy in Clements 2007). Data concerning records of chewing lice from Senegalese Estrildidae are scarce.
    [Show full text]
  • Climate Change Vulnerability of Migratory Species Species
    UNEP/CMS/ScC17/Inf.9 Climate Change Vulnerability of Migratory Species Species Assessments PRELIMINARY REVIEW A PROJECT REPORT FOR CMS SCIENTIFIC COUNCIL The Zoological Society of London (ZSL) has conducted research for the UNEP Convention on Migratory Species (CMS) into the effects of climate change on species protected under the convention. Report production: Aylin McNamara Contributors: John Atkinson Sonia Khela James Peet Ananya Mukherjee Hannah Froy Rachel Smith Katherine Breach Jonathan Baillie Photo Credits for front page: Tim Wacher For further information please contact: Aylin McNamara, Climate Change Thematic Programme, Zoological Society of London Email: [email protected] 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................................................................................................................ 6 2. OVERVIEW OF THREATS ......................................................................................................................................................................................................... 12 Increasing Temperatures .................................................................................................................................................................................................. 13 Changes In Precipitation ..................................................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]