DOCSLIB.ORG

Wetlands of Kenya

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

The IUCN Wetlands Programme Wetlands of Kenya Proceedings of a Seminar on Wetlands of Kenya "11 S.A. Crafter , S.G. Njuguna and G.W. Howard Wetlands of Kenya This one TAQ7-31T - 5APQ IUCN- The World Conservation Union Founded in 1948 , IUCN— The World Conservation Union brings together States , government agencies and a diverse range of non - governmental organizations in a unique world partnership : some 650 members in all , spread across 120 countries . As a union , IUCN exists to serve its members — to represent their views on the world stage and to provide them with the concepts , strategies and technical support they need to achieve their goals . Through its six Commissions , IUCN draws together over 5000 expert volunteers in project teams and action groups . A central secretariat coordinates the IUCN Programme and leads initiatives on the conservation and sustainable use of the world's biological diversity and the management of habitats and natural resources , as well as providing a range of services . The Union has helped many countries to prepare National Conservation Strategies , and demonstrates the application of its knowledge through the field projects it supervises . Operations are increasingly decentralized and are carried forward by an expanding network of regional and country offices , located principally in developing countries . IUCN — The World Conservation Union - seeks above all to work with its members to achieve development that is sustainable and that provides a lasting improvement in the quality of life for people all over the world . IUCN Wetlands Programme The IUCN Wetlands Programme coordinates and reinforces activities of the Union concerned with the management of wetland ecosystems . The Programme focuses upon the conservation of ecological and hydrological processes , in particular by developing , testing , and promoting means of sustainable utilisation of wetlands . It does so in collaboration with IUCN members and partners , in particular those other international institutions with a specific wetland mandate , especially the Ramsar Convention Bureau , and the International Waterfowl and Wetlands Research Bureau ( IWRB ) The core of the Programme is a series of field projects which develop the methodologies for wetland management , in particular in the countries of the developing world where wetlands are used intensively by local communities which depend upon these for their well - being . Related strategic and policy initiatives draw upon the results of these projects and present their conclusions in a form useful for government decision makers and planners . The activities of the Programme are designed on the basis of the concerns and information provided by IUCN members . To facilitate this , the Programme works through IUCN's regional offices . The Programme also works closely with the major development assistance agencies to ensure that conservation considerations are adequately addressed in their projects . The Wetlands Programme receives generous financial support from the World Wide Fund For Nature ( WWF ) , the Swiss Directorate of Development Cooperation and Humanitarian Aid ( DDA ) , the Finnish International Development Agency ( FINNIDA ) and the Government of the Nether lands . Project support has been received from the Swedish International Development Authority ( SIDA ) , Norwegian Agency for Development Cooperation ( NORAD ) , United States Agency for International Development ( USAID ) , the Ford Foundation and a number of IUCN members including the Finnish Association for Nature Conservation ( FANC ) , Institut Français pour le Développement en Coopération ( ORSTOM ) , the Royal Society for the Protection of Birds ( RSPB ) , the United States National Park Service ( USNPS ) and the World Wide Fund For Nature ( WWF ) . It is coordinated from the IUCN Headquarters in Switzerland , with regional coordinators in Central America , South America , Brazil , West Africa , southern Africa and Asia . Wetlands of Kenya Proceedings of the KWWG Seminar on Wetlands of Kenya , National Museums of Kenya , Nairobi , Kenya , 3-5 July 1991 Editors S.A. Crafter , S.G. Njuguna and G.W. Howard IUCN 1992 Published by : IUCN IUCN The World Conservation Union Copyright : 1992. International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources This publication may be produced in whole or part and in any form for education or non - profit uses , without special permission from the copyright holder , provided acknowledgement of the source is made . IUCN would appreciate receiving a copy of any publication which uses this publication as a source No use of this publication may be made for resale or other commercial purpose without the prior written permission of IUCN Citation : S.A. Crafter , S.G. Njuguna and G.W. Howard ( Eds ) , 1992. Wetlands of Kenya . Proceedings of the KWWG Seminar on Wetlands of Kenya , National Museums of Kenya , Nairobi , Kenya , 3-5 July 1991. viii + 183 pp . ISBN : 2-8317-0127-9 Designed and typeset : Samara Publishing Ltd , Tresaith , Dyfed , SA43 2JG , UK Cover design : Sarah Skinner Cover photograph : Lake Bogoria with flamingos Available from : IUCN Communications Division , Rue Mauverney 28 , 1196 Gland , Switzerland The designations of geographical entities in this book , and the presentation of the material , do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the participating organizations concerning the legal status of any country , territory , or area , or of its authorities , or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries The opinions expressed by the authors in this publication do not necessarily represent the view of IUCN Contents Foreword .. vii Definition and overview G.W. Howard 1 Origins and geomorphology of Kenya's wetlands C. Nyamweru ... 5 The hydrology and function of wetlands G.O. Krhoda 13 An account of some important freshwater wetlands of Kenya K.M. Mavuti 23 Wetland birds of Kenya C.M. Gichuki and N.N. Gichuki .. 37 Wetland fish of Kenya D.O. Okeyo 47 Seasonal wetlands in Nairobi F. Ng'weno 55 Mangrove wetlands in Kenya R.K. Ruwa 65 Classification and vegetation of freshwater wetlands F. Muthuri 79 Floating aquatic weeds in Kenya S.G. Njuguna 85 Wetland conservation in Kenya : KWS and Ramsar F.M. Ole Nkako 91 The sociological and economic values of Kenya's wetlands R.W. Kareri . 99 Plant products from freshwater wetlands F. Muthuri 109 Coastal wetland utilisation E.E. Martens 115 Wetlands and tourism N.W. Visser . 135 Tana River Delta wetlands S.G. Njuguna . 139 Utilisation and conservation of wetlands : an agricultural drainage perspective F.N. Gichuki .. 147 Wetlands and water supply in Kenya J.K. Keter .. 155 Agricultural chemicals and wetlands : a review J.K. Gitonga 161 Wetland and dryland management P.M. Mungai 167 Food policy and wetlands P. Olindo 173 Seminar recommendations 175 List of Seminar participants 179 Foreword The Kenya Wetlands Working Group was set up to “ promote the conservation and wise use of wetland habitats in Kenya , according to the guidelines set out in the Ramsar Convention on Wetlands of International Importance ... " . The group arose from recommendations made at a workshop on Wetlands and Waterbirds in Eastern Africa held in Uganda in March 1990 , under the auspices of the Interna tional Waterfowl and Wetlands Research Bureau and the Institute of Environment and Natural Resources of Makerere University , Kampala . The Kenyan delegation to that workshop resolved to set up a national wetlands group and to become involved in the IWRB African Waterfowl Censuses . This was achieved by January 1991 , when the Kenyan group carried out the first coordinated waterfowl census in association with 14 other African countries . Later in that year the group expanded its interests to include wetland conservation and management for wise use and became the KWWG , a sub - group of the East African Natural History Society . KWWG planned the Seminar on the Wetlands of Kenya and held the meeting at the Louis Leakey Memorial Auditorium in the National Museums of Kenya , Nairobi , with assistance from the IUCN Wetlands Programme and the IUCN Eastern Africa Regional Office . The gathering of 130 people from 42 institutions lasted three days and saw 20 papers presented and discussed . The Seminar was kindly opened by a representative of Dr Richard Leakey , Director , Kenya Wildlife Service and was graciously closed by the Director of the National Museums of Kenya , Dr M. Isahakia . On the last afternoon the participants divided into four groups to discuss issues raised by the presentations and to make recommendations for further actions on wetland conservation and management in Kenya . These resolutions were discussed and refined in plenary session and were then printed and circulated to participants . The present proceedings of the Seminar have been funded by the IUCN Wetlands Programme and prepared by KWWG . One of the main intentions of the Seminar was to gather contemporary knowledge and experience of Kenyan wetlands and to publish this as a source book . KWWG hopes that these proceedings will become a starting point for further research activities and act as a background document to begin the process of wise use of wetlands in the country . The Recommendations will act as a stimulus to KWWG for futher action and may initiate general wetland conservation and management activities in government and elsewhere . The need for a national wetlands programme is mentioned in the Recommendations and is backed
Recommended publications
  • The 55 Species of Larger Mammal Known to Be

    The 55 Species of Larger Mammal Known to Be

    Birds of Lolldaiga Hills Ranch¹ Order and scientific name² Common name² Threat3 Comments Struthionidae Ostrich Struthio camelus Common ostrich LC Two subspecies present. Numididae Guineafowl Numida meleagris Helmeted guineafowl LC Acryllium vulturinum Vulturine guineafowl LC Phasianidae Stone partridge, francolins, spurfowl, quails Ptilopachus petrosus Stone partridge LC Francolinus shelleyi Shelley’s francolin LC Francolinus sephaena Crested francolin LC Francolinus hildebrandti Hildebrandt’s francolin LC Francolinus leucoscepus Yellow-necked spurfowl LC Coturnix coturnix Common quail LC Anatidae Ducks, geese Alopochen aegyptiaca Egyptian goose LC Anas sparsa African black duck LC Anas undulata Yellow-billed duck LC Anas clypeata Northern shoveler LC Anas erythrorhyncha Red-billed teal LC Anas acuta Northern pintail LC Anas querquedula Garganey LC Anas hottentota Hottentot teal LC Netta erythrophthalma Southern pochard LC Oxyura maccoa Maccoa duck NT 1 Order and scientific name² Common name² Threat3 Comments Podicipedidae Grebes Tachybaptus ruficollis20 Little grebe LC Ciconiidae Storks Mycteria ibis Yellow-billed stork LC Anastomus lamelligerus African open-billed stork LC Ciconia nigra Black stork LC Ciconia abdimii Abdim’s stork LC Ciconia ciconia White stork LC Leptoptilos crumeniferus Marabou stork LC Threskiornithidae Ibises, spoonbills Threskiornis aethiopicus Sacred ibis LC Bostrychia hagedash Hadada ibis LC Platalea alba African spoonbill LC Ardeidae Herons, egrets, bitterns Ixobrychus sturmii Dwarf bittern LC Butorides striata
  • Environmental and Social Impact Assessment

    Environmental and Social Impact Assessment

    Final Environmental and Social Impact Assessment Report for the Proposed 100MW Solar Independent Power Plant and 18 KM Transmission Line Project, Ganjuwa Local Government Area, Bauchi State by Nigerian Solar Capital Partners/Globeleq/ARM- Harith June 2017 100 MW Independent Solar Power Plant, Bauchi State Environmental and Social Impact Assessment Table of Contents List of Tables iii List of Figures iv List of Acronyms and Abbreviations v List of ESIA Preparers viii Executive Summary ix Chapter One: Introduction 1.1 Background 1-1 1.2 Overview 1-2 1.3 Project Scope 1-2 1.4 Project Location 1-3 1.5 Study Objectives and Terms of Reference 1-6 1.6 Report Structure 1-6 Chapter Two: Policy, Legal and Administrative Framework 2.1 Applicable National Policies 2-8 2.2 Applicable National Regulations 2-10 2.3 Institutional Framework 2-14 2.4 Applicable International Agreements and Policies 2-19 2.5 Permit Requirements 2-21 Chapter Three: Project Description 3.1 Project Overview 3-23 3.2 Project Requirements 3-23 3.3 Project Components 3-24 3.4 Operation and Maintenance 3-34 3.5 Project Activities 3-35 3.5.1 Construction 3-35 3.6 Implementation Schedule 3-35 Chapter Four: Description of the Project Environment 4.1 General 4-38 4.2 Study Area and Location 4-38 4.2.1 Reconnaissance Field Visit 4-38 4.2.2 Baseline Data Acquisition 4-38 4.2.3 Sampling Design 4-45 4.2.4 Field Sampling Methods 4-45 4.2.5 Laboratory Methods 4-47 4.3 Bio-Physical Environmental Baseline Condition 4-47 4.3.1 Climate and Meteorology 4-47 4.3.2 Ambient Air Quality 4-52 4.3.2.1
  • Species List (Note, There Was a Pre-Tour to Kenya in 2018 As in 2017, but These Species Were Not Recorded

    Species List (Note, There Was a Pre-Tour to Kenya in 2018 As in 2017, but These Species Were Not Recorded

    Tanzania Species List (Note, there was a pre-tour to Kenya in 2018 as in 2017, but these species were not recorded. You can find a Kenya list with the fully annotated 2017 Species List for reference) February 6-18, 2018 Guides: Preston Mutinda and Peg Abbott, Driver/guides William Laiser and John Shoo, and 6 participants: Rob & Anita, Susan and Jan, and Bob and Joan KEYS FOR THIS LIST The # in (#) is the number of days the species was seen on the tour (E) – endemic BIRDS STRUTHIONIDAE: OSTRICHES OSTRICH Struthio camelus massaicus – (8) ANATIDAE: DUCKS & GEESE WHITE-FACED WHISTLING-DUCK Dendrocygna viduata – (2) FULVOUS WHISTLING-DUCK Dendrocygna bicolor – (1) COMB DUCK Sarkidiornis melanotos – (1) EGYPTIAN GOOSE Alopochen aegyptiaca – (12) SPUR-WINGED GOOSE Plectropterus gambensis – (2) RED-BILLED DUCK Anas erythrorhyncha – (4) HOTTENTOT TEAL Anas hottentota – (2) CAPE TEAL Anas capensis – (2) NUMIDIDAE: GUINEAFOWL HELMETED GUINEAFOWL Numida meleagris – (12) PHASIANIDAE: PHEASANTS, GROUSE, AND ALLIES COQUI FRANCOLIN Francolinus coqui – (2) CRESTED FRANCOLIN Francolinus sephaena – (2) HILDEBRANDT'S FRANCOLIN Francolinus hildebrandti – (3) Naturalist Journeys [email protected] 866.900.1146 / Caligo Ventures [email protected] 800.426.7781 naturalistjourneys.com / caligo.com P.O. Box 16545 Portal AZ 85632 FAX: 650.471.7667 YELLOW-NECKED FRANCOLIN Francolinus leucoscepus – (4) [E] GRAY-BREASTED FRANCOLIN Francolinus rufopictus – (4) RED-NECKED FRANCOLIN Francolinus afer – (2) LITTLE GREBE Tachybaptus ruficollis – (1) PHOENICOPTERIDAE:FLAMINGOS
  • Lake Chala Tilapia (Oreochromis Hunteri) Ecological Risk Screening Summary

    Lake Chala Tilapia (Oreochromis Hunteri) Ecological Risk Screening Summary

    Lake Chala Tilapia (Oreochromis hunteri) Ecological Risk Screening Summary U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service, March 2012 Revised, June 2018 Web Version, 12/15/2020 Organism Type: Fish Overall Risk Assessment Category: Uncertain Photo: D. H. Eccles. Licensed under Creative Commons BY-NC 3.0. Available: http://www.fishbase.org/photos/PicturesSummary.php?StartRow=0&ID=2032&what=species&T otRec=2. (June 18, 2018). 1 Native Range and Status in the United States Native Range From Froese and Pauly (2018a): “Africa: endemic to Lake Chala [Seegers et al. 2003].” 1 Status in the United States No records of Oreochromis hunteri in trade or in the wild in the United States were found. The Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission has listed the tilapia Oreochromis hunteri as a prohibited species. Prohibited nonnative species (FFWCC 2018), "are considered to be dangerous to the ecology and/or the health and welfare of the people of Florida. These species are not allowed to be personally possessed or used for commercial activities. All species in the genus Oreochromis are considered regulated Type A species in Washington. Regulated Type A species (Washington State Senate 2019) are “nonnative aquatic animal species that pose a low to moderate invasive risk that can be managed based on intended use or geographic scope of introduction, have a beneficial use, and are a priority for department-led or department-approved management of the species' beneficial use and invasive risks.” Possession of any species of tilapia is prohibited without permit in the State of Louisiana (Louisiana State Legislature 2019). O. amphimelas falls within Group I of New Mexico’s Department of Game and Fish Director’s Species Importation List (New Mexico Department of Game and Fish 2010).
  • Disaggregation of Bird Families Listed on Cms Appendix Ii

    Disaggregation of Bird Families Listed on Cms Appendix Ii

    Convention on the Conservation of Migratory Species of Wild Animals 2nd Meeting of the Sessional Committee of the CMS Scientific Council (ScC-SC2) Bonn, Germany, 10 – 14 July 2017 UNEP/CMS/ScC-SC2/Inf.3 DISAGGREGATION OF BIRD FAMILIES LISTED ON CMS APPENDIX II (Prepared by the Appointed Councillors for Birds) Summary: The first meeting of the Sessional Committee of the Scientific Council identified the adoption of a new standard reference for avian taxonomy as an opportunity to disaggregate the higher-level taxa listed on Appendix II and to identify those that are considered to be migratory species and that have an unfavourable conservation status. The current paper presents an initial analysis of the higher-level disaggregation using the Handbook of the Birds of the World/BirdLife International Illustrated Checklist of the Birds of the World Volumes 1 and 2 taxonomy, and identifies the challenges in completing the analysis to identify all of the migratory species and the corresponding Range States. The document has been prepared by the COP Appointed Scientific Councilors for Birds. This is a supplementary paper to COP document UNEP/CMS/COP12/Doc.25.3 on Taxonomy and Nomenclature UNEP/CMS/ScC-Sc2/Inf.3 DISAGGREGATION OF BIRD FAMILIES LISTED ON CMS APPENDIX II 1. Through Resolution 11.19, the Conference of Parties adopted as the standard reference for bird taxonomy and nomenclature for Non-Passerine species the Handbook of the Birds of the World/BirdLife International Illustrated Checklist of the Birds of the World, Volume 1: Non-Passerines, by Josep del Hoyo and Nigel J. Collar (2014); 2.
  • OIK-02296 Ferger, SW, Dulle, HI, Schleuning, M

    OIK-02296 Ferger, SW, Dulle, HI, Schleuning, M

    Oikos OIK-02296 Ferger, S. W., Dulle, H. I., Schleuning, M. and Böhning- Gaese, K: 2015. Frugivore diversity increases frugivory rates along a large elevational gradient. – Oikos doi: 10.1111/oik.02296 Appendix 1. Map of Mt Kilimanjaro showing the location of the 64 study plots in 13 different habitat types. Appendix 2. List of all 187 bird species that were observed, their average body mass and their feeding guild. Appendix 3. Effect of bird abundance/richness and fruit color on the proportion of pecked vs. unpecked artificial fruits without controlling for vertical vegetation heterogeneity and natural fruit abundance. Appendix 4. Effect of vertical vegetation heterogeneity, natural fruit abundance and fruit color on the proportion of pecked versus unpecked artificial fruits. 1 Appendix 1 Map of Mount Kilimanjaro showing the location of the 64 study plots in 13 different habitat types. The near-natural habitat types are savannah (sav), lower montane forest (flm), Ocotea forest (foc), Podocarpus forest (fpo), Erica forest (fer) and Helichrysum scrub (hel). The disturbed habitat types are maize field (mai), Chagga homegarden (hom), shaded coffee plantation (cof), unshaded coffee plantation (sun), grassland (gra), disturbed Ocotea forest (fod) and disturbed Podocarpus forest (fpd). Each habitat type is represented by five replicate plots, except for the unshaded coffee plantation, which is covered by four replicate plots. One of these five (respectively four) plots per habitat type is used as ‘focal plot’ (yellow squares) for especially labor-intensive studies like the artificial fruits experiment presented in this study. As background map, we used the National Geographic World Map developed by National Geographic and Esri (<http://goto.arcgisonline.com/maps/NatGeo_World_Map>).
  • The Birds (Aves) of Oromia, Ethiopia – an Annotated Checklist

    The Birds (Aves) of Oromia, Ethiopia – an Annotated Checklist

    European Journal of Taxonomy 306: 1–69 ISSN 2118-9773 https://doi.org/10.5852/ejt.2017.306 www.europeanjournaloftaxonomy.eu 2017 · Gedeon K. et al. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License. Monograph urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:A32EAE51-9051-458A-81DD-8EA921901CDC The birds (Aves) of Oromia, Ethiopia – an annotated checklist Kai GEDEON 1,*, Chemere ZEWDIE 2 & Till TÖPFER 3 1 Saxon Ornithologists’ Society, P.O. Box 1129, 09331 Hohenstein-Ernstthal, Germany. 2 Oromia Forest and Wildlife Enterprise, P.O. Box 1075, Debre Zeit, Ethiopia. 3 Zoological Research Museum Alexander Koenig, Centre for Taxonomy and Evolutionary Research, Adenauerallee 160, 53113 Bonn, Germany. * Corresponding author: [email protected] 2 Email: [email protected] 3 Email: [email protected] 1 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:F46B3F50-41E2-4629-9951-778F69A5BBA2 2 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:F59FEDB3-627A-4D52-A6CB-4F26846C0FC5 3 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:A87BE9B4-8FC6-4E11-8DB4-BDBB3CFBBEAA Abstract. Oromia is the largest National Regional State of Ethiopia. Here we present the first comprehensive checklist of its birds. A total of 804 bird species has been recorded, 601 of them confirmed (443) or assumed (158) to be breeding birds. At least 561 are all-year residents (and 31 more potentially so), at least 73 are Afrotropical migrants and visitors (and 44 more potentially so), and 184 are Palaearctic migrants and visitors (and eight more potentially so). Three species are endemic to Oromia, 18 to Ethiopia and 43 to the Horn of Africa. 170 Oromia bird species are biome restricted: 57 to the Afrotropical Highlands biome, 95 to the Somali-Masai biome, and 18 to the Sudan-Guinea Savanna biome.
  • 29Th 2019-Uganda

    29Th 2019-Uganda

    AVIAN SAFARIS 23 DAY UGANDA BIRDING AND NATURE TOUR ITINERARY Date: July 7 July 29, 2019 Tour Leader: Crammy Wanyama Trip Report and all photos by Crammy Wanyama Black-headed Gonolek a member of the Bush-shrikes family Day 1 – July 7, 2019: Beginning of the tour This tour had uneven arrivals. Two members arrived two days earlier and the six that came in on the night before July 7th, stayed longer; therefore, we had a pre and post- tour to Mabira Forest. For today, we all teamed up and had lunch at our accommodation for the next two nights. This facility has some of the most beautiful gardens around Entebbe; we decided to spend the rest of the afternoon here watching all the birds you would not expect to find around a city garden. Some fascinating ones like the Black-headed Gonolek nested in the garden, White-browed Robin-Chat too did. The trees that surrounded us offered excellent patching spots for the African Hobby. Here we had a Falco patching out in the open for over forty minutes! Superb looks at a Red-chested and Scarlet-chested Sunbirds. The gardens' birdbath attracted African Thrush that reminded the American birders of their American Robin, Yellow- throated Greenbul. Still looking in the trees, we were able to see African Grey Woodpeckers, both Meyer's and Grey Parrot, a pair of Red-headed Lovebirds. While walking around the facility, we got good looks at a flying Shikra and spent ample time with Ross's Turaco that flew back and forth. We had a very lovely Yellow-fronted Tinkerbird on the power lines, Green-backed Camaroptera, a very well sunlit Avian Safaris: Email: [email protected] Website: http://www.aviansafaris.com AVIAN SAFARIS Spectacled Weaver, was added on the Village and Baglafecht Weavers that we had seen earlier and many more.
  • Borassus Aethiopum Mart

    Borassus Aethiopum Mart

    Seed structure and germination in Borassus aethiopum Mart. Myriam Collin1, Jean Luc Verdeil2, Herrol Wollo3, Marc Lartaud2, Mariano Joly Kpatenon3, Valère Salako3, Kifouli Adéoti3, Thierry Beulé4 1 IRD, UMR DIADE, Montpellier, France. 2 CIRAD, UMR AGAP, Montpellier, France. 3 UAC, Cotonou, Bénin. 4 CIRAD, UMR DIADE, Montpellier, France. Borassus aethiopum Mart.(Arecaceae, Coryphoideae) is a dioecious tree (Fig. 1) endemic to Africa which is widely distributed in savannah regions of the continent (Fig. 2). It is a multipurpose palm playing a prominent socio-economic role in local population (Fig. 3). In Benin, the hypocotyls are exploited for human diet resulting in an intense pressure on natural stands of the species with consequences on regeneration. The lack of information on seed germination and conservation hinders seedling production for sustainable Borassus aethiopum population management. In this context, we have undertaken to first describe the morpho/anatomy and germination behaviour of mature seeds, for the purpose of later addressing the physiological aspects of seed conservation. GERMINATION The fruit of B. aethiopum is a spherical drupe of about 14,5 cm in diameter with a mean weight of 1.2 Kg. It contains one to three seeds (Fig. 4). At maturity, the fruit falls to the ground, where the pulp decays releasing the kernels which germinate between 2 and 4 weeks later by remote germination (Fig. 5). The water content of isolated fresh seeds with endocarp was found to be high (47%) (Tab. 1). Figure 2: Distribution of Borassus aethiopum Mart. in Africa Table 1: Some parameters related to seed germination of B. aethiopum Parameters Values Water content before sowing (%) 47 ± 0.4 Rate of germination 70% a b Average days of germination 28 ± 5 1.5 cm Figure 4: Cross section of fruit c d 28 D 4 DAG 7 DAG 10 DAG 13 DAG Figure 3: Some products obtained Figure 5: Time course of germination.
  • Study of Genetic Variability of Palmyapalm on the Basis of Tree Morphology and Yield Parameters in Bihar

    Study of Genetic Variability of Palmyapalm on the Basis of Tree Morphology and Yield Parameters in Bihar

    Int.J.Curr.Microbiol.App.Sci (2020) 9(5): 2522-2528. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences ISSN: 2319-7706 Volume 9 Number 5 (2020) Journal homepage: http://www.ijcmas.com Original Research Article https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2020.905.289 Study of Genetic Variability of Palmyapalm on the Basis of Tree Morphology and Yield Parameters in Bihar Soni Kumari1, Ruby Rani1*, Samik Sengupta1, AhmarAftab2, Neha Kumari1 and Ankita Aman1 1Department of Horticulture (Fruit and Fruit Technology), 2Department of Food Science and Post-Harvest Technology, Bihar Agricultural University, Sabour, Bhagalpur, Bihar, India-813210 *Corresponding author ABSTRACT Palmyra palm (Borassus flabelliferL ) or commonly called Taad or Tarh is a palm tree of the Sugar palm group. It is an important multipurpose tree of great utility. K e yw or ds There is a rich genetic diversity of palmyrah in Bihar, but no database is available regarding Palmyra. Thus a study was undertaken to study the variability in Palmyra, Palmyra for their plant morphological traits and yield parameters. Sample was Variability , Morphology , Yield collected during fruiting season and plants with diverse in nature for tree characteristics and fruit yield. Among 22 genotypes selected in the area surveyed, Article Info the great variability was noted with respect to plant height (dwarf and Tall) and Accepted: yield parameters. The average height of the palms was 15.22m with a variation 18 April 2020 from 7.10m in PC-7 to 22.50m in PC-12.Trunk girth varied from 137cm (PC-11) Available Online: to 180 cm (PC-6) and .
  • The Status of Kenya's Elephants

    The Status of Kenya's Elephants

    The status of Kenya’s elephants 1990–2002 C. Thouless, J. King, P. Omondi, P. Kahumbu, I. Douglas-Hamilton The status of Kenya’s elephants 1990–2002 © 2008 Save the Elephants Save the Elephants PO Box 54667 – 00200 Nairobi, Kenya first published 2008 edited by Helen van Houten and Dali Mwagore maps by Clair Geddes Mathews and Philip Miyare layout by Support to Development Communication CONTENTS Acknowledgements iv Abbreviations iv Executive summary v Map of Kenya viii 1. Introduction 1 2. Survey techniques 4 3. Data collection for this report 7 4. Tsavo 10 5. Amboseli 17 6. Mara 22 7. Laikipia–Samburu 28 8. Meru 36 9. Mwea 41 10. Mt Kenya (including Imenti Forest) 42 11. Aberdares 47 12. Mau 51 13. Mt Elgon 52 14. Marsabit 54 15. Nasolot–South Turkana–Rimoi–Kamnarok 58 16. Shimba Hills 62 17. Kilifi District (including Arabuko-Sokoke) 67 18. Northern (Wajir, Moyale, Mandera) 70 19. Eastern (Lamu, Garissa, Tana River) 72 20. North-western (around Lokichokio) 74 Bibliography 75 Annexes 83 The status of Kenya’s elephants 1990–2002 AcKnowledgemenTs This report is the product of collaboration between Save the Elephants and Kenya Wildlife Service. We are grateful to the directors of KWS in 2002, Nehemiah Rotich and Joseph Kioko, and the deputy director of security at that time, Abdul Bashir, for their support. Many people have contributed to this report and we are extremely grateful to them for their input. In particular we would like to thank KWS field personnel, too numerous to mention by name, who facilitated our access to field records and provided vital information and insight into the status of elephants in their respective areas.
  • Case Study Report For

    Case Study Report For

    Case Study One Indigenous Peoples’ Rights in the Kenya Lake System in the Great Rift Valley 1 By DR. KANYINKE SENA Indigenous Peoples’ Rights in the Kenya Lake System in the Great Rift Valley 1 CASE STUDY ONE Indigenous Peoples’ Rights in the Kenya World Heritage (IIPFWH), as a standing global Lake System in the Great Rift Valley body aimed at representing indigenous peo- ples voices in the World Heritage Committee processes.5 The Committee referred to the establishment of the IIPFWH, “As an impor- tant reflection platform on the involvement of Indigenous Peoples in the identification, conservation and management of World Heritage properties, with a particular focus on the nomination process.” 6 Pursuant to the mandate of the Forum, this report aims at analyzing Indigenous Peoples’ involvement in the Kenya Lakes System in the Great Rift Valley World Heritage Site. The report is as result of extensive literature re- view and interviews with communities in and around the lakes that comprise the Kenya K. Sena: Lake Bogoria Lakes System. The Kenya Lake System in the Great Rift Val- ley is a World Heritage site in Kenya which comprises three inter-linked, relatively shal- low, alkaline lakes and their surrounding territories. The lakes system includes Lakes Elementeita, Nakuru and Bogoria in the Rift Valley. The lakes cover a total area of 32,034 and was inscribed as a world heritage site in 2011. The inscription was based on the lakes system outstanding universal values and criterion (vii), (ix) and (x) as provided for, under paragraph 77 of the Operational Guidelines for the Implementation of the World Heritage Convention.