DOCSLIB.ORG

A Preliminary Risk Assessment of Cane Toads in Kakadu National Park Scientist Report 164, Supervising Scientist, Darwin NT

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
A Preliminary Risk Assessment of Cane Toads in Kakadu National Park Scientist Report 164, Supervising Scientist, Darwin NT supervising scientist 164 report A preliminary risk assessment of cane toads in Kakadu National Park RA van Dam, DJ Walden & GW Begg supervising scientist national centre for tropical wetland research This report has been prepared by staff of the Environmental Research Institute of the Supervising Scientist (eriss) as part of our commitment to the National Centre for Tropical Wetland Research Rick A van Dam Environmental Research Institute of the Supervising Scientist, Locked Bag 2, Jabiru NT 0886, Australia (Present address: Sinclair Knight Merz, 100 Christie St, St Leonards NSW 2065, Australia) David J Walden Environmental Research Institute of the Supervising Scientist, GPO Box 461, Darwin NT 0801, Australia George W Begg Environmental Research Institute of the Supervising Scientist, GPO Box 461, Darwin NT 0801, Australia This report should be cited as follows: van Dam RA, Walden DJ & Begg GW 2002 A preliminary risk assessment of cane toads in Kakadu National Park Scientist Report 164, Supervising Scientist, Darwin NT The Supervising Scientist is part of Environment Australia, the environmental program of the Commonwealth Department of Environment and Heritage © Commonwealth of Australia 2002 Supervising Scientist Environment Australia GPO Box 461, Darwin NT 0801 Australia ISSN 1325-1554 ISBN 0 642 24370 0 This work is copyright Apart from any use as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, no part may be reproduced by any process without prior written permission from the Supervising Scientist Requests and inquiries concerning reproduction and rights should be addressed to Publications Inquiries, Supervising Scientist, GPO Box 461, Darwin NT 0801 e-mail: publications@eriss erin gov au Internet: http://www ea gov au/ssd/index html Views expressed by the authors do not necessarily reflect the views and policies of the Supervising Scientist, the Commonwealth Government, or any collaborating organisation Printed in Darwin by NTUniprint Contents Executive summary vii Acknowledgments xvi Abbreviations xvi Update 1 1 Introduction 3 1.1 Background 3 1.2 Project aim 3 1.3 Approach 3 1.3.1 Wetland risk assessment framework 3 1.3.2 Information sources 5 2 The risk assessment 6 2.1 Identification of the problem 6 2.1.1 Cane toads — overview of natural history 6 2.1.2 History of cane toad invasion in Australia 8 2.1.3 Kakadu National Park — overview of habitats and fauna 9 2.1.4 Conceptual model 20 2.2 The potential extent of cane toads in Kakadu National Park 20 2.2.1 Distribution and range expansion 20 2.2.2 Preferred habitats and environmental/bioclimatic conditions 26 2.2.3 Summary of potential extent in Kakadu National Park 32 2.3 The potential effects of cane toads in Kakadu National Park 36 2.3.1 Effects on predator species 36 2.3.2 Effects on prey species 50 2.3.3 Effects of resource competition 52 2.3.4 Cultural effects 56 2.3.5 Economic effects 57 2.3.6 Other potential effects 58 2.4 Identification of the risks 60 2.4.1 Comparison of potential effects and extent 60 2.4.2 Identification of key habitats 60 iii 2.4.3 Identification of species at risk 61 2.4.4 Cultural, socio-economic and other risks 66 2.5 Uncertainty and information gaps 67 2.5.1 Extent of cane toads in Kakadu National Park 67 2.5.2 Effects of cane toads in Kakadu National Park 68 3 Recommendations for monitoring 72 3.1 Priority habitats for monitoring 72 3.2 Priority species for monitoring 72 3.2.1 Predators 72 3.2.2 Prey 73 3.2.3 Competition 73 3.3 Priorities for addressing information gaps 73 3.4 Evaluation of past and present monitoring programs 74 3.4.1 Broad scale surveys 74 3.4.2 Ongoing monitoring programs 75 3.4.3 Other surveys or monitoring programs 75 4 Risk management and reduction 77 5 References 79 iv Figures Figure 1 Model for wetland risk assessment 4 Figure 2 An adult cane toad 7 Figure 3 The Kakadu region 10 Figure 4 The documented current west north-west range of cane toads in the Top End 22 Figure 5 Major rivers, roads and tracks in Kakadu National Park 33 Tables Table 1 Matrix of potentially adverse environmental impacts associated with the introduced cane toad (Bufo marinus) in Kakadu National Park 21 Table 2 Selected examples of habitats occupied by cane toad populations in other parts of the world 29 Table 3 Predatory groups of aquatic invertebrates in Kakadu National Park, potentially susceptible to cane toads 38 Table 4 Predatory fish species in Kakadu National Park, potentially susceptible to cane toads 39 Table 5 Predatory frog species in Kakadu National Park, potentially susceptible to cane toads 41 Table 6 Predatory lizard species in Kakadu National Park, potentially susceptible to cane toads 42 Table 7 Predatory snake species in Kakadu National Park, potentially susceptible to cane toads 44 Table 8 Predatory bird species in Kakadu National Park, potentially susceptible to cane toads 47 Table 9 Predatory mammal species in Kakadu National Park, potentially susceptible to cane toads 49 Table 10 Species in Kakadu National Park, potentially susceptible to competition with cane toads 56 Table 11 Criteria for determining risk categories and level of priority for predatory species susceptible or potentially susceptible to cane toads 62 Table 12 Risk ranking and priority status for Kakadu National Park species susceptible or potentially susceptible to cane toads 63 v vi Executive summary Background and approach Cane toads (Bufo marinus) entered the Northern Territory (NT) in 1980 from Queensland and are rapidly approaching Kakadu National Park (KNP), having recently been reported in the upper Mann River and Snowdrop Creek, approximately 15–30 km to the east of Kakadu National Park. Concern about the invasion of cane toads in Kakadu National Park has been highlighted on a number of occasions, and in 1998 participants at a workshop on the potential impacts and control of cane toads in Kakadu National Park conceded that a strategic approach for assessing and possibly minimising cane toad impacts should be developed. The first stage would be an ecological risk assessment to predict the likely extent of impacts of cane toads in Kakadu National Park and identify key vulnerable habitats and species. This information could be used to develop new monitoring programs and assess existing ones. This assessment is a direct result of Environment Australia’s concern about the potential impacts of cane toads in Kakadu National Park. The wetland risk assessment framework developed by eriss for the Ramsar Convention was used to predict key habitats and the species most at risk. The majority of the assessment involved identifying the problem, the potential extent and effects of the problem, the risk, and subsequently making recommendations on monitoring. Major information gaps relevant to predicting impacts and developing appropriate monitoring programs were also identified. The risk assessment was based on information from published and unpublished scientific and anecdotal reports. Information on Kakadu National Park was derived from relevant research projects undertaken in the Park since the early 1980s. A number of relevant Territory and Commonwealth agencies were consulted, as were relevant cane toad, native fauna and/or wildlife management experts from around Australia. Discussions were held with community members in the Borroloola and Mataranka regions to gain an indigenous/cultural perspective of the cane toad issue. Identification of the problem Since their introduction to Australia in 1935 to control sugar cane pests in Queensland, cane toads have spread naturally and with human assistance throughout much of Queensland, northern NSW and the Top End of the NT. The cane toad’s preference for certain disturbed areas means that areas of degraded natural habitat have probably helped their spread. They eat a wide variety of prey, breed opportunistically, have a far greater fecundity than native anurans, and develop rapidly particularly in warmer waters. They tolerate a broad range of environmental and climatic conditions, can occupy many different habitats and compete for resources with many native species. Most significantly, they possess highly toxic chemical predator defences, with many experimental and anecdotal reports of deaths of native predators that have attempted to consume cane toads. It is accepted that the cane toad will establish and spread rapidly in Kakadu National Park — a World Heritage area with Ramsar listed wetlands, well known for its spectacular wilderness, nature conservation values, rich diversity of habitats, flora and fauna, and cultural significance. There is serious concern that the World Heritage status of Kakadu National Park could be diminished if any of these attributes were adversely affected by cane toads. vii The potential extent of cane toads in Kakadu National Park Cane toads are likely to colonise almost every habitat type within Kakadu National Park. The saline regions of the coastal plains and deltaic estuarine floodplains will most likely support some cane toads at various times, although they are not likely to use these habitats on a permanent basis. Other less suitable areas include deep open water and/or flowing channel habitats and tidal regions of larger rivers (excluding riparian zones) which extend 70 to 80 km inland during the Dry season. The steady range expansion over the last ten years indicates that most wetland habitats are probably suitable as breeding habitat and also as Dry season refuges. Patterns of dispersal within Kakadu will probably rely on the transport corridors and the major rivers and creeks. Dispersal rates within a catchment could be up to 100 km y-1. The current location of cane toads would indicate an initial progression down the South Alligator River catchment via its sub-catchments (eg Jim Jim Creek, Deaf Adder Creek).
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Lake Pinaroo Ramsar Site
    Ecological character description: Lake Pinaroo Ramsar site Ecological character description: Lake Pinaroo Ramsar site Disclaimer The Department of Environment and Climate Change NSW (DECC) has compiled the Ecological character description: Lake Pinaroo Ramsar site in good faith, exercising all due care and attention. DECC does not accept responsibility for any inaccurate or incomplete information supplied by third parties. No representation is made about the accuracy, completeness or suitability of the information in this publication for any particular purpose. Readers should seek appropriate advice about the suitability of the information to their needs. © State of New South Wales and Department of Environment and Climate Change DECC is pleased to allow the reproduction of material from this publication on the condition that the source, publisher and authorship are appropriately acknowledged. Published by: Department of Environment and Climate Change NSW 59–61 Goulburn Street, Sydney PO Box A290, Sydney South 1232 Phone: 131555 (NSW only – publications and information requests) (02) 9995 5000 (switchboard) Fax: (02) 9995 5999 TTY: (02) 9211 4723 Email: [email protected] Website: www.environment.nsw.gov.au DECC 2008/275 ISBN 978 1 74122 839 7 June 2008 Printed on environmentally sustainable paper Cover photos Inset upper: Lake Pinaroo in flood, 1976 (DECC) Aerial: Lake Pinaroo in flood, March 1976 (DECC) Inset lower left: Blue-billed duck (R. Kingsford) Inset lower middle: Red-necked avocet (C. Herbert) Inset lower right: Red-capped plover (C. Herbert) Summary An ecological character description has been defined as ‘the combination of the ecosystem components, processes, benefits and services that characterise a wetland at a given point in time’.
    [Show full text]
  • Amphibian Abundance and Detection Trends During a Large Flood in a Semi-Arid Floodplain Wetland
    Herpetological Conservation and Biology 11:408–425. Submitted: 26 January 2016; Accepted: 2 September 2016; Published: 16 December 2016. Amphibian Abundance and Detection Trends During a Large Flood in a Semi-Arid Floodplain Wetland Joanne F. Ocock1,4, Richard T. Kingsford1, Trent D. Penman2, and Jodi J.L. Rowley1,3 1Centre for Ecosystem Science, School of Biological, Earth and Environmental Sciences, UNSW Australia, Sydney, New South Wales, 2052, Australia 2Centre for Environmental Risk Management of Bushfires, Institute of Conservation Biology and Environmental Management, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, New South Wales 2522, Australia 3Australian Museum Research Institute, Australian Museum, 6 College St, Sydney, New South Wales 2010, Australia 4Corresponding author, email: [email protected] Abstract.—Amphibian abundance and occupancy are often reduced in regulated river systems near dams, but com- paratively little is known about how they are affected on floodplain wetlands downstream or the effects of actively managed flows. We assessed frog diversity in the Macquarie Marshes, a semi-arid floodplain wetland of conserva- tion significance, identifying environmental variables that might explain abundances and detection of species. We collected relative abundance data of 15 amphibian species at 30 sites over four months, coinciding with a large natural flood. We observed an average of 39.9 ± (SE) 4.3 (range, 0-246) individuals per site survey, over 47 survey nights. Three non-burrowing, ground-dwelling species were most abundant at temporarily flooded sites with low- growing aquatic vegetation (e.g., Limnodynastes tasmaniensis, Limnodynastes fletcheri, Crinia parinsignifera). Most arboreal species (e.g., Litoria caerulea) were more abundant in wooded habitat, regardless of water permanency.
    [Show full text]
  • Animals from the Outback ANIMALS from the OUTBACK Introduction
    Animals From The Outback ANIMALS FROM THE OUTBACK Introduction • Australia is a big country with many different animal habitats. Australia’s deserts, rainforests, reefs, swamps, bushlands and mountains provide homes for many different types of animals. • Many of Australia’s animals are ‘endemic’ to the country. This means that they are only found in Australia, and nowhere else on Earth. • The main reason is because Australia is surrounded by sea, and isolated from the rest of the world. Many Australian animals have evolved on their own, and haven’t been able to spread to other countries or continents. Bandicoot Bandicoot • Bandicoots are marsupials that are endemic to Australia and New Guinea. (As we saw above, if an animal is ‘endemic’ to an area, then it isn’t found anywhere else.) • There are over 20 species of bandicoot – most are rabbit-sized, and all have long legs, thin tails and pointed noses. Bandicoots are omnivores that forage for food in their bushland habitat. Black Swan Black Swan • Black swans are elegant birds with black feathers and bright red bills. Black swans inhabit wetlands across Australia. They eat plants and algae, and use their long necks to find food. Cane Toad Cane Toad • Many Australians would rather the cane toad was not on a list of Australian animals! Cane toads secrete poison from behind their ears as a defense against predators. • The cane toad is an invasive species in Australia and has spread rapidly across the country since its introduction in the 1940s. Cane toads are a threat to many native Australian animals, who fall ill after eating the toads.
    [Show full text]
  • Classical Biological Control of Arthropods in Australia
    Classical Biological Contents Control of Arthropods Arthropod index in Australia General index List of targets D.F. Waterhouse D.P.A. Sands CSIRo Entomology Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research Canberra 2001 Back Forward Contents Arthropod index General index List of targets The Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research (ACIAR) was established in June 1982 by an Act of the Australian Parliament. Its primary mandate is to help identify agricultural problems in developing countries and to commission collaborative research between Australian and developing country researchers in fields where Australia has special competence. Where trade names are used this constitutes neither endorsement of nor discrimination against any product by the Centre. ACIAR MONOGRAPH SERIES This peer-reviewed series contains the results of original research supported by ACIAR, or material deemed relevant to ACIAR’s research objectives. The series is distributed internationally, with an emphasis on the Third World. © Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research, GPO Box 1571, Canberra ACT 2601, Australia Waterhouse, D.F. and Sands, D.P.A. 2001. Classical biological control of arthropods in Australia. ACIAR Monograph No. 77, 560 pages. ISBN 0 642 45709 3 (print) ISBN 0 642 45710 7 (electronic) Published in association with CSIRO Entomology (Canberra) and CSIRO Publishing (Melbourne) Scientific editing by Dr Mary Webb, Arawang Editorial, Canberra Design and typesetting by ClarusDesign, Canberra Printed by Brown Prior Anderson, Melbourne Cover: An ichneumonid parasitoid Megarhyssa nortoni ovipositing on a larva of sirex wood wasp, Sirex noctilio. Back Forward Contents Arthropod index General index Foreword List of targets WHEN THE CSIR Division of Economic Entomology, now Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO) Entomology, was established in 1928, classical biological control was given as one of its core activities.
    [Show full text]
  • Protecting Threatened Quolls and Other Biodiversity on Kimberley Islands from Cane Toads
    Protecting threatened quolls and other biodiversity on Kimberley islands from cane toads Project Summary Project 4.2.5 Kimberley islands. Photo: Mark Cowan Research in Brief Why is the research impacts when they reach islands and in relatively short time periods. This research will use existing needed? In combination, these factors mean data to predict future invasion Cane toads (Rhinella marina) have that keeping cane toads off currently by cane toads of Australian caused extensive declines and local uninvaded Australian islands is a high islands, particularly the Kimberley extinctions of many species on priority for conservation managers. islands. This information is mainland Australia. Both aquatic and important for prioritizing The endangered Northern Quoll terrestrial species that eat frogs or (Dasyurus hallucatus) was once surveillance action on these toads are highly at risk. islands in order to conserve widespread across Northern Australia toad-sensitive species such as Australia’s islands are important but many local declines have been the endangered Northern Quoll. conservation refuges which are rich observed following the invasion of in unique endemic species. Islands cane toads. Northern Quolls occur that are free from invasive species, on several islands across the northern particularly feral animals, have also Australian coast. Many islands in enabled some species to persist that Queensland and the Northern have become extinct on the mainland. Territory have already been invaded The value of islands as refuges from by cane toads. The more than invasive species has led conservation 2,500 islands off Western Australia’s managers to use them as arks to Kimberley coast are thought to be host insurance populations of highly cane toad free, although cane toads vulnerable mainland species.
    [Show full text]
  • Cane Toads on Sanibel and Captiva
    April 2020 SCCF Member Update Cane Toads on Sanibel and Captiva By Chris Lechowicz, Herpetologist and Wildlife & Habitat Management Director It is that time of year again when it is slowly starting to warm up and any out-of-season rainstorms can trigger Parotoid gland amphibian breeding. On Sanibel, this is limited to frogs and toads as we do not have any salamander species on the island. Besides the southern leopard frog (Lithobates sphenocephalus) which is our sole true winter breeder, the southern toad (Anaxyrus terrrestris) and the giant toad aka cane toad (Rhinella marina) are the usual suspects for late winter/early spring breeding, especially after a heavy rain. The southern toad is native and too often confused for the invasive exotic giant toad — the cane toad — in our area. Giant toads go by several local names, depending on where you are located. In Florida, the most common The first cane toad (Rhinella marina) documented on Sanibel names are cane toad, faux toad, or Bufo toad. Outside right before it was captured while attempting to breed. Female Florida, many people call them marine toads. The local cane toads can lay up to 35,000 eggs at a time (average 8,000 name “Bufo toad” comes from the former scientific name - 25,000). Inset: Cane toad eggs are laid in long strings that (Bufo marinus). In 2008, the cane toad was split off into resemble black beads. These were collected the night they were a new group of South American beaked toads (Rhinella). first documented by SCCF on July 17, 2013.
    [Show full text]
  • Birding Brisbane
    June 2019 Birding Brisbane Birds and Birdwatching in the River City Volume 1, Issue 6 A Milestone for the Atlas of the Birds of Brisbane The Atlas of the Birds of for lorikeets or a fond- Brisbane, brings together ness for falcons? The data from eBird into a Atlas needs your help! user-friendly package Pick your favourite Inside this issue: that birders can explore group of birds and start and use to aid their bird- writing. Contact one of ing, as well as promote the editors, Richard conservation. The Atlas Fuller or Louis Back- In-depth bird news 1 is providing information strom for more infor- on the distribution, mation on how to get Big Day report 4 abundance, breeding, started (see back cover). eBird skills: Locations 6 seasonality and trends for every bird species If writing species ac- known to have occurred counts sounds daunt- Mystery Photo 6 in Brisbane and adjacent ing, that’s fine too – Contributing to the 6 Coral Sea waters. please look around the Atlas website and let us have Undersurveyed Atlas 7 Last week, the Atlas any feedback on the Square: Black Soil passed a huge milestone texts that are up. From the Atlas: Com‐ 7 – 50 draft species ac- boundary will make their mon Myna counts written! This is a Finally, the easiest way way into the Atlas dataset, List of Observers 10 great achievement, but to contribute to the Atlas and provide critical infor- more than 350 accounts is by going out and bird- mation on the status of our remain to be written.
    [Show full text]
  • Volume 4 Issue 1B
    Captive & Field Herpetology Volume 4 Issue 1 2020 Volume 4 Issue 1 2020 ISSN - 2515-5725 Published by Captive & Field Herpetology Captive & Field Herpetology Volume 4 Issue1 2020 The Captive and Field Herpetological journal is an open access peer-reviewed online journal which aims to better understand herpetology by publishing observational notes both in and ex-situ. Natural history notes, breeding observations, husbandry notes and literature reviews are all examples of the articles featured within C&F Herpetological journals. Each issue will feature literature or book reviews in an effort to resurface past literature and ignite new research ideas. For upcoming issues we are particularly interested in [but also accept other] articles demonstrating: • Conflict and interactions between herpetofauna and humans, specifically venomous snakes • Herpetofauna behaviour in human-disturbed habitats • Unusual behaviour of captive animals • Predator - prey interactions • Species range expansions • Species documented in new locations • Field reports • Literature reviews of books and scientific literature For submission guidelines visit: www.captiveandfieldherpetology.com Or contact us via: [email protected] Front cover image: Timon lepidus, Portugal 2019, John Benjamin Owens Captive & Field Herpetology Volume 4 Issue1 2020 Editorial Team Editor John Benjamin Owens Bangor University [email protected] [email protected] Reviewers Dr James Hicks Berkshire College of Agriculture [email protected] JP Dunbar
    [Show full text]
  • Broad-Headed Snake (Hoplocephalus Bungaroides)', Proceedings of the Royal Zoological Society of New South Wales (1946-7), Pp
    Husbandry Guidelines Broad-Headed Snake Hoplocephalus bungaroides Compiler – Charles Morris Western Sydney Institute of TAFE, Richmond Captive Animals Certificate III RUV3020R Lecturers: Graeme Phipps, Jacki Salkeld & Brad Walker 2009 1 Occupational Health and Safety WARNING This Snake is DANGEROUSLY VENOMOUS CAPABLE OF INFLICTING A POTENTIALLY FATAL BITE ALWAYS HAVE A COMPRESSION BANDAGE WITHIN REACH SNAKE BITE TREATMENT: Do NOT wash the wound. Do NOT cut the wound, apply substances to the wound or use a tourniquet. Do NOT remove jeans or shirt as any movement will assist the venom to enter the blood stream. KEEP THE VICTIM STILL. 1. Apply a broad pressure bandage over the bite site as soon as possible. 2. Keep the limb still. The bandage should be as tight as you would bind a sprained ankle. 3. Extend the bandage down to the fingers or toes then up the leg as high as possible. (For a bite on the hand or forearm bind up to the elbow). 4. Apply a splint if possible, to immobilise the limb. 5. Bind it firmly to as much of the limb as possible. (Use a sling for an arm injury). Bring transport to the victim where possible or carry them to transportation. Transport the victim to the nearest hospital. Please Print this page off and put it up on the wall in your snake room. 2 There is some serious occupational health risks involved in keeping venomous snakes. All risk can be eliminated if kept clean and in the correct lockable enclosures with only the risk of handling left in play.
    [Show full text]
  • Patterns of Discovery of Birds in Kerala Breeding of Black-Winged
    Vol.14 (1-3) Jan-Dec. 2016 newsletter of malabar natural history society Akkulam Lake: Changes in the birdlife Breeding of in two decades Black-winged Patterns of Stilt Discovery of at Munderi Birds in Kerala Kadavu European Bee-eater Odonates from Thrissur of Kadavoor village District, Kerala Common Pochard Fulvous Whistling Duck A new duck species - An addition to the in Kerala Bird list of - Kerala for subscription scan this qr code Contents Vol.14 (1-3)Jan-Dec. 2016 Executive Committee Patterns of Discovery of Birds in Kerala ................................................... 6 President Mr. Sathyan Meppayur From the Field .......................................................................................................... 13 Secretary Akkulam Lake: Changes in the birdlife in two decades ..................... 14 Dr. Muhamed Jafer Palot A Checklist of Odonates of Kadavoor village, Vice President Mr. S. Arjun Ernakulam district, Kerala................................................................................ 21 Jt. Secretary Breeding of Black-winged Stilt At Munderi Kadavu, Mr. K.G. Bimalnath Kattampally Wetlands, Kannur ...................................................................... 23 Treasurer Common Pochard/ Aythya ferina Dr. Muhamed Rafeek A.P. M. A new duck species in Kerala .......................................................................... 25 Members Eurasian Coot / Fulica atra Dr.T.N. Vijayakumar affected by progressive greying ..................................................................... 27
    [Show full text]
  • Ixobrychus Flavicollis (Latham, 1790) Other Common Names Mangrove Bittern, Yellow-Necked Bittern
    THREATENED SPECIES INFORMATION Black Bittern Ixobrychus flavicollis (Latham, 1790) Other common names Mangrove Bittern, Yellow-necked Bittern Conservation status The Black Bittern is listed as a Vulnerable Recorded occurrences in Species on Schedule 2 of the Threatened conservation reserves Species Conservation Act, 1995 (TSC Act). Comerong Island NR, Dorrigo NP, Description (summarised from Schodde & Ukerebagh NR, Nadgee NR, Blue Mountains NP, Scheyville NP, Catai NP, Tidemann 1986; Marchant & Higgins 1990) Dharug NP, Yuragir NP, Nightcap NP, Head and Body Length Bundjalung NP, Brunswick Heads NP 550-650mm (NPWS 1999). Wingspan 800mm Habitat Wing 215-238mm The Black Bittern inhabits both terrestrial Tail and estuarine wetlands, generally in areas 75-89mm of permanent water and dense vegetation Bill (Marchant & Higgins 1990). Where 75-83mm permanent water is present, this species may Tarsus occur in flooded grassland, forest, 60-70mm Weight woodland, rainforest and mangroves 300-420g (Marchant & Higgins 1990). The Black Bittern is dark grey to black in Ecology colour with buff streaks on the throat and a characteristic yellow streak on the sides of The Black Bittern forages on reptiles, fish the head and down the neck. The female is and invertebrates, including dragonflies, paler in colour than the male and the shrimps and crayfish (Barker & Vestjens underparts are streaked with yellow, white 1989). It generally feeds at dusk and at night and black. (Marchant & Higgins 1990). During the day, the Black Bittern roosts in trees or on The Black Bittern has a characteristic the ground amongst dense reeds (Marchant booming call that is mainly heard during the & Higgins 1990).
    [Show full text]
  • Demansia Papuensis)
    Clinical and Experimental Pharmacology and Physiology (2006) 33, 364–368 Blackwell Publishing Ltd NeuromuscularSOriginal Kuruppu ArticleIN et al. effects of D. papuensisVITRO venom NEUROTOXIC AND MYOTOXIC EFFECTS OF THE VENOM FROM THE BLACK WHIP SNAKE (DEMANSIA PAPUENSIS) S Kuruppu,* Bryan G Fry† and Wayne C Hodgson* *Monash Venom Group, Department of Pharmacology, Monash University and †Australian Venom Research Unit, Department of Pharmacology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia SUMMARY of Australian snakes whose venoms have not been pharmacologically characterized. Whip snakes (D. papuensis and D. atra, also called 1. Black whip snakes belong to the family elapidae and are D. vestigata) belong to the family elapidae and are found throughout found throughout the northern coastal region of Australia. The the northern coastal region of Australia.3 The black whip snake black whip snake (Demansia papuensis) is considered to be poten- (D. papuensis) is considered to be potentially dangerous due to its tially dangerous due to its size and phylogenetic distinctiveness. size (up to 2 m) and phylogenetic distinctiveness which may suggest Previous liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry analysis of the presence of unique venom components.2 LC-MS analysis of D. papuensis venom indicated a number of components within D. papuensis venom indicated a number of components within the the molecular mass ranges compatible with neurotoxins. For the molecular mass ranges of 6–7 and 13–14 kDa.4 This may indicate the first time, this study examines the in vitro neurotoxic and myotoxic presence of short and long chain a-neurotoxins or PLA2 components, effects of the venom from D.
    [Show full text]