DOCSLIB.ORG

Follow-Up Report on Five PSL1 Substances for Which There Was Insufficient Information to Conclude Whether the Substances Constitute a Danger to the Environment

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Follow-Up Report on Five PSL1 Substances for Which There Was Insufficient Information to Conclude Whether the Substances Constitute a Danger to the Environment Follow-up Report on Five PSL1 Substances for Which There Was Insufficient Information to Conclude Whether the Substances Constitute a Danger to the Environment 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 1,4-Dichlorobenzene Trichlorobenzenes Tetrachlorobenzenes Pentachlorobenzene December 2003 ii Table of Contents SYNOPSIS......................................................................................................................................1 1.0 INTRODUCTION....................................................................................................................3 2.0 ENTRY CHARACTERIZATION..........................................................................................4 2.1 ANTHROPOGENIC RELEASES IN CANADA.................................................................................4 3.0 EXPOSURE CHARACTERIZATION..................................................................................5 3.1 ENVIRONMENTAL FATE ...........................................................................................................5 3.1.1 Sediment..........................................................................................................................5 3.1.2 Soil ..................................................................................................................................5 3.1.3 Biota................................................................................................................................6 3.2 ENVIRONMENTAL CONCENTRATIONS ......................................................................................6 3.2.1 Sediment near point sources...........................................................................................6 3.2.2 Long-range transport......................................................................................................7 3.2.3 Soil ..................................................................................................................................8 4.0 EFFECTS CHARACTERIZATION......................................................................................9 4.1 BENTHIC ORGANISMS ..............................................................................................................9 4.2 SOIL-DWELLING BIOTA..........................................................................................................11 5.0 ASSESSMENT OF “TOXIC” UNDER CEPA 1999 ..........................................................11 5.1 CEPA 64(A): ENVIRONMENT ................................................................................................11 5.2 PERSISTENCE AND BIOACCUMULATION CRITERIA AS DEFINED IN THE PERSISTENCE AND BIOACCUMULATION REGULATIONS OF CEPA 1999....................................................................12 5.2.1 Persistence ....................................................................................................................12 5.2.1.1 Sediment ................................................................................................................12 5.2.1.2 Soil .........................................................................................................................12 5.2.1.3 Air ..........................................................................................................................13 5.2.2 Bioaccumulation ...........................................................................................................13 5.3 ASSESSMENT ENDPOINTS.......................................................................................................13 5.4 ENVIRONMENTAL RISK CHARACTERIZATION .........................................................................13 5.4.1 Sediment........................................................................................................................13 5.4.1.1 Determination of Estimated No-Effects Values (ENEVSEDs)................................14 5.4.1.2 Determination of risk quotients for sediments.......................................................14 5.4.2 Soil ................................................................................................................................16 5.4.2.1 Determination of Estimated No-Effects Values (ENEVSOILs)...............................16 5.4.2.2 Determination of risk quotients for soils ...............................................................16 5.5 SOURCES OF UNCERTAINTY ...................................................................................................16 5.6 CONCLUSIONS........................................................................................................................18 6.0 CONSIDERATIONS FOR FOLLOW-UP..........................................................................19 ii 7.0 REFERENCES.......................................................................................................................20 APPENDIX 1. PERSISTENCE AND BIOACCUMULATION CRITERIA AS DEFINED IN THE PERSISTENCE AND BIOACCUMULATION REGULATIONS OF CEPA 1999 .......................................................................................................................................................38 APPENDIX 2. SEARCH STRATEGY - NEW INFORMATION FOR THE ASSESSMENT OF "TOXIC" TO THE ENVIRONMENT UNDER PARAGRAPH 64 (A) OF CEPA 1999 .......................................................................................................................................................39 iii List of Tables Table 1. Summary of information on production and uses of CBzs in Canada1 ...........................28 Table 2. Concentration of CBzs in sewage sludge ........................................................................28 Table 3. Recent OC-normalized CBz concentrations, reported as median values, in Canadian sediments near point sources .................................................................................................29 Table 4. Median OC-normalized CBz concentrations in soils ......................................................30 Table 5. Percentage of freshwater test populations (Hexagenia spp. and Tubifex tubifex) affected by CBz exposure (µg/g OC normalized1) after 21-day and 28-day exposures, respectively (Day et al., 1995) ...................................................................................................................31 Table 6. Lowest concentrations of CBzs causing effects on the marine amphipod Rhepoxynius abronius (Doe et al., 1995)....................................................................................................32 Table 7. Lowest effect concentration estimates in sediment (µg/g OC) based on effects data for water column organisms, calculated using the EqP method..................................................33 Table 8. Lowest effect concentrations (µg/g OC) for lettuce and earthworms .............................34 Table 9. CTVSEDs selected for benthic freshwater and marine organisms ....................................35 Table 10. Application factors and derived ENEVSEDs for benthic organisms (freshwater and marine) ...................................................................................................................................35 Table 11. Risk quotients for benthic organisms, based on maximum EEVs (EEVSEDs) for Canadian sediments ...............................................................................................................36 Table 12. Determination of ENEVSOILs for soil-dwelling organisms............................................36 Table 13. Risk quotients for terrestrial organisms, based on maximum EEVs (EEVSOILs) for Canadian soils ........................................................................................................................37 iv List of Acronyms and Abbreviations ACR acute to chronic ratio AET Apparent Effect Threshold BAF bioaccumulation factor BCF bioconcentration factor CBz chlorobenzene CBzs chlorobenzenes (1,2-dichlorobenzene, 1,4-dichlorobenzene, trichlorobenzenes, tetrachlorobenzenes, pentachlorobenzene) CEPA Canadian Environmental Protection Act CEPA 1999 Canadian Environmental Protection Act, 1999 CTV Critical Toxicity Value CTVSED Critical Toxicity Value for sediments DCB dichlorobenzene 1,2-DCB 1,2-dichlorobenzene 1,4-DCB 1,4-dichlorobenzene dw dry weight EC50 median effective concentration EEV Estimated Exposure Value ENEV Estimated No-Effects Value ENEVSED Estimated No-Effects Value for sediments ENEVSOIL Estimated No-Effects Value for soils EqP equilibrium partitioning HC5 hazardous concentration for 5% of exposed organisms Kow octanol-water partition coefficient LC50 median lethal concentration LC90 lethal concentration to 90% of the test organisms LOEC Lowest-Observed-Effect Concentration MDL method detection limit NOEC No-Observed-Effect Concentration NPRI National Pollutant Release Inventory OC organic carbon PCBs polychlorinated biphenyls PSL Priority Substances List PSL1 first Priority Substances List QCB pentachlorobenzene STP sewage treatment plant TCB trichlorobenzene TeCBs tetrachlorobenzenes v SYNOPSIS 1,2-Dichlorobenzene (1,2-DCB), 1,4-dichlorobenzene (1,4-DCB), trichlorobenzenes (TCBs), tetrachlorobenzenes (TeCBs) and pentachlorobenzene (QCB), which appeared on the first Priority Substances List (PSL1), were assessed to determine whether these substances should be considered “toxic” as defined under the Canadian Environmental Protection Act (CEPA). It was concluded in the PSL1 assessment that these compounds were not “toxic” under Paragraphs
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Chemical Hazards Chemist Edson Haddad 2016 Sao Paulo
    ENVIRONMENTAL COMPANY OF SAO PAULO STATE – CETESB REGIONAL CENTRE OF STOCKHOLM CONVENTION ON POPs FOR LATIN AMERICA AND THE CARIBBEAN REGION V INTERNATIONAL TRAINING PROGRAM ON ENVIRONMENTAL SOUND MANAGEMENT ON CHEMICALS AND WASTES, ESPECIALLY ON PERSISTENT ORGANIC POLLUTANTS (POPs) AND MERCURY (Hg) Chemical Hazards Chemist Edson Haddad 2016 Sao Paulo – SP – Brazil Safety with Chemicals • Chemicals can only be safely handled if their properties, reactions and behavior in different situations are fully known. • This knowledge allows for the selection of the appropriate PPE –Personal Protective Equipment, as well as the techniques to be employed for containment, control and environmental monitoring. Control Actions 9Neutralization, absorption, washing/dilution, soil recovery, monitoring, waste destination. I worked 20 years and had only one accident. CHEMICAL HAZARDS COFFEE WATER OXYGEN NO SUBSTANCE IS COMPLETELY FREE OF TOXIC EFFECTS TO THE BODY 12 POPs z PESTICIDES - Aldrin, dieldrin, chlordane, DDT, endrin, heptachlor, mirex, hexachlorobenzene and toxaphene; z INDUSTRIAL SUBSTANCES - PCBs (polychlorinated biphenyls) and HCB (hexachlorobenzene); z NON-INTENTIONAL SUB PRODUCTS – hexachlorobenzene; polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins and polychlorinated dibenzofurans (PCDD/PCDF), and PCBs. aldrin DDT mirex PCB Dioxins and furans 9 POPs • PESTICIDES - chlordecone, alpha hexachlorocyclohexane, beta hexachlorocyclohexane, lindane, pentachlorobenzene; •INDUSTRIAL SUBSTANCES - hexabromobiphenyl, hexabromodiphenyl ether and heptabromodiphenyl ether,
    [Show full text]
  • Chlorobenzenes (PDF)
    EPA-454/R-93-044 LOCATING AND ESTIMATING AIR EMISSIONS FROM SOURCES OF CHLOROBENZENES (REVISED) Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27711 March 1994 This report has been reviewed by the Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, and has been approved for publication. Any mention of trade names or commercial products is not intended to constitute endorsement or recommendation for use. ii CONTENTS Section Page DISCLAIMER ..................................................... ii LIST OF FIGURES .................................................. vi LIST OF TABLES .................................................. vii 1.0 PURPOSE OF DOCUMENT ..................................... 1-1 1.1 Reference for Section 1.0 ................................... 1-5 2.0 OVERVIEW OF DOCUMENT CONTENTS .......................... 2-1 2.1 References for Section 2.0 .................................. 2-5 3.0 BACKGROUND .............................................. 3-1 3.1 Nature of Pollutant ....................................... 3-1 3.1.1 Properties of Chlorobenzenes ........................... 3-5 3.1.2 Properties of Monochlorobenzene ........................ 3-6 3.1.3 Properties of Dichlorobenzenes .......................... 3-6 3.1.4 Properties of Trichlorobenzenes ......................... 3-7 3.1.5 Properties of Hexachlorobenzene ........................ 3-7 3.2 Overview of Production and Use .............................. 3-8 3.3
    [Show full text]
  • Reference Guide to Non-Combustion Technologies for Remediation of Persistent Organic Pollutants in Soil, Second Edition – 2010
    Reference Guide to Non-combustion TechnologiesTechnologies for Remediation of Persistent Organic PollutantsPollutants in Soil, SecondS Edition - 2010 ts B an ii ta oa llu ac ll cc o u P m iic u n lla a t g tii rr o O n O tt g a yc llii n n ll c y attii on n e na orra d tt sso ap a ev ss e d B ii ss nd ee a ss udd nn ii r iitt u tiioo oo r tt siit HighHiHig latitudes e ll a a os m e -- po iidd ep DepositionDDe > evaporation PP e a M dd a ff ff o gg o oo nn t r t ii ss r High mobility oo High mobility ff ii ee pp ss cc cc ee nn aa gg aa rr Relatively high mobility rr Long-range Relatively high mobility n t Long-range n t t t aa uu i r cc i r i oceanic i oceanic o - - o rr o o gg ee transport Low mobility n transport n n n h h S o S o p p L L s s o o m m m m m m m m t t t t t t t t t a a a a a a Low latitudes t t Deposition > evaporation c Deposition > evaporation c ee ff ff ee ”” gg iinn p pp op sh as Grr ll ““G a iic T m h e e h n e C iio rm ll-C tt a a a ll iic ad ys ra h eg P De B iiore ogy med hnoll diiatiion Phytotech RR eemme giieess eddiiaattiioonn TTeecchhnnoolloog Solid Waste EPA 542-R-09-007 and Emergency Response September 2010 (5203P) www.clu-in.org/POPs Reference Guide to Non-combustion Technologies for Remediation of Persistent Organic Pollutants in Soil, Second Edition – 2010 Internet Address (URL) http://www.epa.gov Recycled/Recyclable.
    [Show full text]
  • Pentachlorobenzene.Pdf
    About CSIR-NEERI CSIR-NEERI is endorsed as Stockholm Convention Regional Centre (SCRC) on Persistent Organic Pollutants (POPs) for Asia Region at COP-5 meeting held during 25-29th April 2011 at Geneva. SCRC is serving different parties/countries in Pentachlorobenzene the Asia region to help them in their capacity building and transfer of technologies related to POPs and new POPs. Besides India, CSIR-NEERI is serving ten (PeCB) countries of Asia region viz. Bangladesh, Maldives, Mongolia, Myanmar, Nepal, Philippines Thailand, Sri Lanka, UAE and Vietnam. The goals of the SCRC is to provide technical assistance for building capacities of the parties of the Asia region in relation to monitoring and assessment of POPs in the environment, transfer of technologies, raise awareness and promote identification and environmentally sound management(ESM) of POPs and POPs contaminated sites in the region. The Centre is also assisting the parties of Asia region in fulfilling their obligations of the Stockholm Convention. Contact us: Director CSIR-National Environmental Engineering Research Institute (CSIR-NEERI) CSIR-National Environmental Engineering Research Institute (Stockholm Convention Regional Centre on POPs for Asia Region) (Stockholm Convention Regional Centre on POPs for Asia Region), Nehru Marg, Nagpur, India-440020 Nagpur, India-440020. Tel: +91-712-2249885-89 (Ext. +332) Fax: +91-712-2249900 Email: [email protected]; [email protected] 1. What is PeCB? 2. What are the characteristics of PeCB? • Pentachlorobenzene (PeCB) are a group of Chlorobenzenes that are characterized by the presence of a benzene ring in IUPAC Name :1,2,3,4,5-pentachlorobenzene which the hydrogen atoms are replaced by five chlorine Molecular formula : C6HCl5 atoms.
    [Show full text]
  • Pentachlorobenzene
    Stockholm Convention on Persistent Organic Pollutants Persistent Organic Pollutants Review Committee (POPRC) DRAFT RISK MANAGEMENT EVALUATION for Pentachlorobenzene Draft prepared by: The ad hoc working group on pentachlorobenzene April, 2008 1 Draft Risk Management Evaluation for Pentachlorobenzene Note: In accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 8 of the Stockholm Convention, this draft was prepared by the Persistent Organic Review Committee (POPRC) during its intersessional work. Parties and observers to the Stockholm Convention are invited to provide technical and substantive comments on this draft. Comments received will be considered by the ad hoc working group and the revised draft will be made available for the fourth meeting of the POPRC (13-17 October 2008 in Geneva). Please submit your comments to the Secretariat of the Stockholm Convention preferably by e-mail no later than 18 May, 2008 to: Secretariat of the Stockholm Convention POPs Review Committee 11-13 chemin des Anémones CH-1219, Châtelaine, Geneva, Switzerland Fax: (+41 22) 917 80 98 E-mail: [email protected] ___________________________________________________________________________________ Ad hoc working group on pentachlorobenzene Chair: Mr. Dario Sabularse (Philippines) Drafter: Mr. Martinus Petrus Mattheus Jenssen (The Netherlands) Members: Ms. Anahit Aleksandryan (Armenia), Prof. Ian Rae (Australia), Mr. Désiré Ouédraogo (Burkina Faso), Dr. Robert Chénier (Canada), Mr. Abderaman Mahamat Abderaman (Chad), Prof. Kouamé Kouadio (Côte d’Ivoire), Dr. Sylvain Bintein (France)**, Ms. Indrani Chandrasekharan (India)**, Mr. Mohammad Yadallee (Mauritius), Dr. Farah Bouqartacha (Morocco), Dr. Dario Sabularse (Philippines)*, Chair until May 2008, Ms. Evelin Fabjan (Slovenia)*, Prof. Henk Bouwman (South Africa), Dr. José V. Tarazona (Spain), Prof. Bo Wahlström, Ms. Maria Delvin (Sweden), Ms.
    [Show full text]
  • Chlorobenzenes Chemical Guidance Sheet
    CHLOROBENZENES Class or Substance Name Chlorobenzenes (Chlorinated Benzenes) Substance List by CAS Number Chlorobenzenes are a group of twelve chemical substances, each consisting of a benzene ring with one or more hydrogen atoms replaced by chlorine atoms. 108-90-7 Monochlorobenzene (MCB) 108-70-3 1,3,5-trichlorobenzene (1,3,5-TCB) 95-50-1 1,2-dichlorobenzene (1,2-DCB) 634-66-2 1,2,3,4-tetrachlorobenzene (1,2,3,4-TeCB) 541-73-1 1,3-dichlorobenzene (1,3-DCB) 634-90-2 1,2,3,5-tetrachlorobenzene (1,2,3,5-TeCB) 106-46-7 1,4-dichlorobenzene (1,4-DCB) 95-94-3 1,2,4,5-tetrachlorobenzene (1,2,4,5-TeCB) 87-61-6 1,2,3-trichlorobenzene (1,2,3-TCB) 608-93-5 Pentachlorobenzene (PCB) 120-82-1 1,2,4-trichlorobenzene (1,2,4-TCB) 118-74-1 Hexachlorobenzene (HCB) Description of Use in Apparel and Footwear Chlorobenzenes are mainly used as intermediates in the synthesis of other chemicals and may be present as impurities in chemical formulations (for example, dyestuffs and biocides). Chlorobenzenes can be used as dyeing carriers or leveling agents for dyeing, printing and coating of textile and leather materials including fibers, yarns and fabrics. They may also be used as deodorizers, fumigants, degreasers and defoliants. Dichlorobenzenes are used as insecticides or as solvents for rubber, CHLOROBENZENES MAY waxes or disinfection agents. Trichlorobenzenes are used as herbicides, insecticides or as solvents for dyestuffs and other BE FOUND IN: chemical formulations with high melting points. Textiles and leather materials Legislation around the world restricts the use of some chlorobenzenes .
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Protection Agency Pt. 261, App. VII
    Environmental Protection Agency Pt. 261, App. VII were constituted on the date first above APPENDIX II TO PART 261 [RESERVED] written. [Signature of Grantor] APPENDIX III TO PART 261 [RESERVED] [Title] Attest: APPENDIX IV TO PART 261 [RESERVED [Title] FOR RADIOACTIVE WASTE TEST [Seal] METHODS] [Signature of Trustee] Attest: APPENDIX V TO PART 261 [RESERVED FOR [Title] INFECTIOUS WASTE TREATMENT [Seal] SPECIFICATIONS] (2) The following is an example of the certification of acknowledgement APPENDIX VI TO PART 261 [RESERVED which must accompany the trust FOR ETIOLOGIC AGENTS] agreement for a standby trust fund as specified in section 261.147(h) of this APPENDIX VII TO PART 261—BASIS FOR chapter. State requirements may differ LISTING HAZARDOUS WASTE on the proper content of this acknowl- edgement. EPA haz- State of lllllllllllllllllll ardous Hazardous constituents for which listed waste County of llllllllllllllllll No. On this [date], before me personally came [owner or operator] to me known, who, being F001 ..... Tetrachloroethylene, methylene chloride trichloro- by me duly sworn, did depose and say that ethylene, 1,1,1-trichloroethane, carbon tetra- chloride, chlorinated fluorocarbons. she/he resides at [address], that she/he is F002 ..... Tetrachloroethylene, methylene chloride, trichloro- [title] of [corporation], the corporation de- ethylene, 1,1,1-trichloroethane, 1,1,2-trichloro- scribed in and which executed the above in- ethane, chlorobenzene, 1,1,2-trichloro-1,2,2- strument; that she/he knows the seal of said trifluoroethane, ortho-dichlorobenzene, corporation; that the seal affixed to such in- trichlorofluoromethane. strument is such corporate seal; that it was F003 ..... N.A. so affixed by order of the Board of Directors F004 ....
    [Show full text]
  • 711701023.Pdf
    research for RIJKSINSTITUUT VOOR VOLKSGEZONDHEID EN MILIEU man and environment NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF PUBLIC HEALTH AND THE ENVIRONMENT RIVM report 711701 023 Technical evaluation of the Intervention Values for Soil/sediment and Groundwater Human and ecotoxicological risk assessment and derivation of risk limits for soil, aquatic sediment and groundwater J.P.A. Lijzen, A.J. Baars, P.F. Otte, M.G.J. Rikken, F.A. Swartjes, E.M.J. Verbruggen and A.P. van Wezel February 2001 This investigation has been performed by account of The Ministry of Housing Spatial Planning and the Environment, Directorate General for the Environment (DGM), Directorate of Soil, Water and Rural Areas, within the framework of project 711701, Risk in relation to Soil Quality. RIVM, P.O. Box 1, 3720 BA Bilthoven, telephone: 31 - 30 - 274 91 11; fax: 31 - 30 - 274 29 71 page 2 of 147 RIVM report 711701 023 Abstract Intervention Values are generic soil quality standards used to classify historically contaminated soils (i.e. before 1987) as seriously contaminated in the framework of the Dutch Soil Protection Act. In 1994 Intervention Values were published for 70 (groups of) compounds. These values, based on potential risks to human health and ecosystems, are technically evaluated on the basis of recent scientific views and data on risk assessment. Serious Risk Concentrations (SRCs, formerly called SCC) are revised for soil and groundwater; in addition SRCs are derived for sediment. A policy phase will start in 2001 to determine how the results will be implemented for setting Intervention Values. Starting points for the derivation of SRCs, partly chosen because of the policy context in which the SRCs are used, are mentioned and discussed.
    [Show full text]
  • List of Hazardous Substances and Reportable Quantities 1. This Appendix Lists Materials
    172.101 App A Appendix A to §172.101 - List of Hazardous Substances and Reportable Quantities 1. This Appendix lists materials and their corresponding reportable quantities (RQ's) that are listed or designated as "hazardous substances'' under section 101(14) of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act, 42 U.S.C. 9601(14) (CERCLA; 42 U.S.C. 9601 et seq). This listing fulfills the requirement of CERCLA, 42 U.S.C. 9656(a), that all ``hazardous substances,'' as defined in 42 U.S.C. 9601(14), be listed and regulated as hazardous materials under 49 U.S.C. 5101-5127. That definition includes substances listed under sections 311(b)(2)(A) and 307(a) of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, 33 U.S.C. 1321(b)(2)(A) and 1317(a), section 3001 of the Solid Waste Disposal Act, 42 U.S.C. 6921, and section 112 of the Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. 7412. In addition, this list contains materials that the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency has determined to be hazardous substances in accordance with section 102 of CERCLA, 42 U.S.C. 9602. It should be noted that 42 U.S.C. 9656(b) provides that common and contract carriers may be held liable under laws other than CERCLA for the release of a hazardous substance as defined in that Act, during transportation that commenced before the effective date of the listing and regulating of that substance as a hazardous material under 49 U.S.C. 5101-5127. 2. This Appendix is divided into two TABLES which are entitled "TABLE 1-HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES OTHER THAN RADIONUCLIDES'' and "TABLE 2-RADIONUCLIDES.'' A material listed in this Appendix is regulated as a hazardous material and a hazardous substance under this subchapter if it meets the definition of a hazardous substance in §171.8 of this subchapter.
    [Show full text]
  • National Chemicals Registers and Inventories: Benefits and Approaches to Development ABSTRACT
    The WHO Regional Oce for Europe The World Health Organization (WHO) is a specialized agency of the United Nations created in 1948 with the primary responsibility for international health matters each with its own programme geared to the particular health conditions of the countries it serves. Member States Albania Andorra Armenia Austria Azerbaijan Belarus Belgium Bosnia and Herzegovina National chemicals Bulgaria Croatia Cyprus registers and inventories: Czechia Denmark Estonia Finland benefits and approaches France Georgia Germany to development Greece Hungary Iceland Ireland Israel Italy Kazakhstan Kyrgyzstan Latvia Lithuania Luxembourg Malta Monaco Montenegro Netherlands Norway Poland Portugal Republic of Moldova Romania Russian Federation San Marino Serbia Slovakia Slovenia Spain Sweden Switzerland Tajikistan The former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia Turkey Turkmenistan Ukraine UN City, Marmorvej 51, DK-2100 Copenhagen Ø, Denmark United Kingdom Tel.: +45 45 33 70 00 Fax: +45 45 33 70 01 Uzbekistan E-mail: [email protected] Website: www.euro.who.int ACKNOWLEDGEMENT The project “Development of legislative and operational framework for collection and sharing of information on hazardous chemicals in Georgia “ (2015-2017) was funded by the German Federal Environment Ministry’s Advisory Assistance Programme for environmental protection in the countries of central and eastern Europe, the Caucasus and central Asia and other countries neighbouring the European Union. It was supervised by the German Environment Agency. The responsibility
    [Show full text]
  • Potential Chemical Contaminants in the Marine Environment
    Potential chemical contaminants in the marine environment An overview of main contaminant lists Victoria Tornero, Georg Hanke 2017 EUR 28925 EN This publication is a Technical report by the Joint Research Centre (JRC), the European Commission’s science and knowledge service. It aims to provide evidence-based scientific support to the European policymaking process. The scientific output expressed does not imply a policy position of the European Commission. Neither the European Commission nor any person acting on behalf of the Commission is responsible for the use that might be made of this publication. Contact information Name: Victoria Tornero Address: European Commission Joint Research Centre, Directorate D Sustainable Resources, Water and Marine Resources Unit, Via Enrico Fermi 2749, I-21027 Ispra (VA) Email: [email protected] Tel.: +39-0332-785984 JRC Science Hub https://ec.europa.eu/jrc JRC 108964 EUR 28925 EN PDF ISBN 978-92-79-77045-6 ISSN 1831-9424 doi:10.2760/337288 Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 2017 © European Union, 2017 The reuse of the document is authorised, provided the source is acknowledged and the original meaning or message of the texts are not distorted. The European Commission shall not be held liable for any consequences stemming from the reuse. How to cite this report: Tornero V, Hanke G. Potential chemical contaminants in the marine environment: An overview of main contaminant lists. ISBN 978-92-79-77045-6, EUR 28925, doi:10.2760/337288 All images © European Union 2017 Contents Acknowledgements ................................................................................................ 1 Abstract ............................................................................................................... 2 1 Introduction ...................................................................................................... 3 2 Compilation of substances of environmental concern .............................................
    [Show full text]
  • PERSISTENT ORGANIC POLLUTANTS DDT-Aldrin
    PCS/95.39 December 1995 A REVIEW OF SELECTED PERSISTENT ORGANIC POLLUTANTS DDT-Aldrin-Dieldrin-Endrin-Chlordane Heptachlor-Hexachlorobenzene-Mïrex-Toxaphene Polychlorinated biphenyls Dioxins and Furans Please note that the pagination and layout of this pdf file are not identical to the printed document Prepared by: L. Ritter, K.R. Solomon, J. Forget Canadian Network of Toxicology Centres 620 Gordon Street Guelph ON, Canada NIG 2W1 and M. Stemeroff and C. O’Leary Deloitte and Touche Consulting Group 98 Macdonell St., Guelph ON, Canada NlH 2Z7 For: The International Programme on Chemical Safety (IPCS) within the framework of the Inter-Organization Programme for the Sound Management of Chemicals (IOMC) This Review is produced for the International Programme on Chemical Safety (IPCS). The work is carried out within the framework of the Inter-Organization: Programme for the Sound Management of Chemicals (IOMC). The Review does not necessarily represent the decisions or the stated policy of the United Nations Environment Programme, the International Labour Organisation, or the World Health Organization. The International Programme on Chemical Safety (IPCS) is a joint venture of the United Nations Environment Programme, the International Labour Organisation, and the World Health Organization. The main objective of the IPCS is to carry out and disseminate evaluations of the effects of chemicals on human health and the quality of the environment. Supporting activities include the development of epidemiological, experimental laboratory, and risk-assessment methods that could produce internationally comparable results, and the development of human resources in the field of chemical safety. Other activities carried out by the IPCS include the development of know-how for coping with chemical accidents, strengthening capabilities for prevention of an response to chemical accidents and their follow-up, coordination of laboratory testing and epidemiological studies, and promotion of research on the mechanisms of the biological action of chemicals.
    [Show full text]