DOCSLIB.ORG

Potential for Eurasia Land Bridge Corridors & Logistics Developments

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

EUROPEAN COMMISSION DG TREN SIXTH FRAMEWORK PROGRAMME THEMATIC PRIORITY 1.6 SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT, GLOBAL CHANGE & ECOSYSTEMS INTEGRATED PROJECT – CONTRACT N. TREN-06-FP6TR-SO7-69821 RETRACK REorganization of Transport networks by advanced RAil freight Concepts Deliverable no. 13.2 Title Potential for Eurasia land bridge corridors & logistics developments along the corridors Dissemination level Public Work Package WP 13 Author(s) Davydenko I., Landa Maxta I., Martens R., Nesterova N., Wark T. Co-author(s) Behrens R., Burgess A., Roggenkamp M., Roest Crollius A., Wagener N. Status (F: final, D: draft) F-23032012 File Name Project Start Date and May 2007 – July 2012 Duration TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 Introduction 11 1.1 Background information 11 1.2 Objective of Task 13.1 11 1.3 Outline of the report 12 2 Results of recent rail/intermodal transport R&D projects and pilot train runs between Europe and China 13 2.1 The recent rail transport projects and train pilots 13 2.2 International and regional corridor initiatives 14 2.2.1 CAREC rail corridors 14 2.2.2 NELTI 17 2.2.3 TRACECA 19 2.2.4 UNECE initiatives 22 2.3 Monitoring indices 26 2.3.1 CAREC Corridor Performance Monitoring 26 2.3.2 TRAX TRACECA 28 2.3.3 LPI the World Bank 30 2.4 Block train runs 33 2.4.1 Trans Eurasia – Express 33 2.4.2 East-Wind project 35 2.4.3 Kazakhstan vector 36 2.4.4 The Mongolian Vector 37 2.4.5 Other container train services 38 2.5 Study for the project of the integrated logistics system and marketing action plan for container transportation (Kazakhstan) 39 2.6 Summary of the recent R&D projects and pilot train runs 44 3 Overview of the RETRACK – China connections 46 3.1 Selection of main rail land bridges connecting Europe and China 46 3.2 Connections of the RETRACK corridor with the TransSib, Central and TRACECA corridors 47 3.3 Identification of RETRACK – TransSib – China rail corridor and routes 50 3.3.1 Main routes and corresponding corridor organisation 50 3.3.2 Interconnection option: RETRACK – Duisburg - TransSib 51 3.3.3 Interconnection option: RETRACK – Bratislava - Moscow - TransSib 53 3.3.4 Interconnection option: RETRACK – Budapest – Moscow - TransSib 55 3.4 Identification of RETRACK – Central Kazakhstan - China rail corridor and routes 56 3.4.1 Main routes and corresponding corridor organisation 57 3.4.2 Interconnection option: RETRACK – Bratislava – Aksaralskaya II – Central corridor 58 3.4.3 Interconnection option: RETRACK – Budapest – Aksaralskaya II – Central corridor 59 3.4.4 Interconnection option: RETRACK – Bucharest – Aksaralskaya II – Central corridor 60 3.5 Identification of RETRACK – TRACECA – China rail corridors and routes 62 3.5.1 Main routes and corresponding corridor organisation 62 3.5.2 Interconnection option: RETRACK – Bucharest – Varna – Poti - TRACECA 63 3.5.3 Interconnection option: RETRACK – Budapest (/Bratislava) –Sofia - Varna – Poti - TRACECA 65 3.5.4 Interconnection option: RETRACK – Budapest (/Bratislava) – Sofia – Ankara – Tbilisi – TRACECA 66 Potential for Eurasia land bridge corridors and logistics developments along the corridors 2 3.6 Final destinations within China 68 3.6.1 Destination: Zabaykalsk - Beijing 68 3.6.2 Destination: Zabaykalsk – Lanzhou 69 3.6.3 Destination : Dostyk– Lanzhou 70 3.6.4 Destination: Zamin Uud – Lanzhou 71 3.7 Summary of the RETRACK – China rail corridors and interconnection routes 72 4 Railway infrastructure and institutional framework in the countries involved in the TransSib, Central and TRACECA corridors 76 4.1 Railway infrastructure and rolling stock characteristics 76 4.2 Institutional framework and railway liberalisation process 82 4.3 Multilateral and bilateral agreements in the region 84 4.4 Summary of the infrastructure condition and institutional framework of the railway transport in the countries involved in the corridors 89 5 Trans-Siberian corridor 90 5.1 Organisational model of the corridor 90 5.2 Infrastructure assessment of the TransSib corridor 92 5.2.1 Technical and operational characteristics of the main route of Trans-Siberian Railway 93 5.2.2 Technical and operational characteristics of the TransSib – Trans Kazakh route 96 5.2.3 Technical and operational characteristics of the TransSib – Mongolian route 98 5.2.4 Technical and operational characteristics of the TransSib – Manchurian route 99 5.3 Strength and weaknesses: what potential clients thinks 101 5.3.1 Supply Chain Requirements for TransSib rail corridor 101 5.3.2 Major risks along the corridors 111 5.4 Operational and technical barriers along the TransSib corridor 114 5.4.1 Technical barriers 114 5.4.2 Operational barriers 114 5.5 Summary of the TransSib corridor potential for RETRACK 116 6 The Central Corridor 119 6.1 Organisational model of the corridor 119 6.2 Infrastructure assessment of the Central corridor 122 6.2.1 Technical and operational characteristics of the Central corridor 122 6.2.2 Main terminals on the route 124 6.3 Strength and weaknesses: what potential clients thinks 126 6.3.1 Supply Chain Requirements for the Central corridor 126 6.3.2 Major risks along the corridor 134 6.4 Operational and technical barriers along the Central corridor 135 6.4.1 Technical barriers 135 6.4.2 Operational barriers 135 6.5 Summary of the Central corridor potential for RETRACK 137 7 TRACECA corridor 139 7.1 Organisational model of the corridor 139 7.2 Infrastructure assessment of the TRACECA corridor 140 7.2.1 Technical and operational characteristics of the TRACECA – Turkmenbashi route 140 7.2.2 Technical and operational characteristics of the TRACECA – Aktau route 147 Potential for Eurasia land bridge corridors and logistics developments along the corridors 3 7.3 Strength and weaknesses: what potential clients thinks 149 7.3.1 Supply Chain Requirements for TRACECA rail corridor 149 7.3.2 Major risks along the corridor 157 7.4 Operational and tehchnical barriers along the TRACECA corridor 158 7.4.1 Technical barriers 158 7.4.2 Operational barriers 158 7.5 Summary of the TRACECA corridor potential for RETRACK 165 8 Opportunities for the rail land bridges between Europe and China 168 8.1 Assessment method 169 8.2 Main assumptions 172 8.2.1 General model assumptions 172 8.2.2 Estimation 2010: main assumptions and parameters 173 8.2.3 Scenario 2020: main assumptions and parameters 174 8.3 Results - economic potential of the routes 175 8.3.1 TransSib – Manchurian route 176 8.3.2 TransSib – Trans Kazakh route 179 8.3.3 TRACECA – Turkmenbashi route 181 8.3.4 Central corridor 183 8.3.5 All corridors are competing 185 8.4 Summary and conclusion on the economic potential of the Europe – China rail corridors 188 9 Comparative analysis of the linking RETRACK with China through Trans-Siberian, Central-Kazakhstan and TRACECA rail corridors. 190 9.1 Connection of the North of RETRACK with China 190 9.1.1 Comparison of technical characteristics and barriers 190 9.1.2 Comparison of the operational characteristics 192 9.2 Connection of the South of RETRACK with China 195 9.2.1 Comparison of the technical characteristics and barriers 195 9.2.2 Comparison of the operational characteristics 197 9.3 Summary 199 10 Conclusions 201 Bibliographie 209 ANNEX 1 Overview of the R&D initiatives and its member countries 209 ANNEX 2 Comparison of spped on CAREC rail and road corridors 209 ANNEX 3 LPI Assessments 209 ANNEX 4 Companies on the Russian freight rail market 216 ANNEX 5 RZD rail directorates along the routes using TransSib rail corridor 218 ANNEX 6 Interogated companies and operators along TransSib rail corridor 220 Potential for Eurasia land bridge corridors and logistics developments along the corridors 4 TABLES Table 1: BCP and major time costing activities (in hours) for rail and road transport 28 Table 2: TRAX General Index 29 Table 3: TRAX Stretch Index 29 Table 4: TRAX Node Index 30 Table 5: LPI International (1 is best and 5 is worst) 31 Table 6: Overview of services of public and private trains by Trans Eurasia Express 34 Table 7: Container block train runs in Russia, Central Asia, China 38 Table 8: Analysis overview of competing routes for the corridor West Europe-Coastal China 43 Table 9: Analysis overview of competing routes for the corridor West Europe-Inland China 43 Table 10: RETRACK – TransSib connection via Germany, Poland and Belarus 51 Table 11: RETRACK – TransSib connection via Slovakia, Ukraine and Russia 53 Table 12: RETRACK – TransSib connection via Hungary, Ukraine and Russia 55 Table 13: RETRACK – Central corridor connection via Slovakia, Ukraine and Russia 58 Table 14: RETRACK – Central corridor connection via Hungary, Ukraine and Russia 59 Table 15: RETRACK – Central corridor connection via Romania, Moldova, Ukraine and Russia 60 Table 16: RETRACK – TRACECA connection via Romania and Bulgaria 64 Table 17: RETRACK – TRACECA connection via Hungary, Serbia, Bulgaria 65 Table 18: RETRACK – Central corridor connection via Hungary, Serbia, Bulgaria and Turkey 67 Table 19: Destination: Zabaïkalsk – Beijing 68 Table 20: Destination: Zabaykalsk – Lanzhou 69 Table 21: Destination: Dostyk – Lanzhou 70 Table 22: Destination: Zamyn Uud – Lanzhou 71 Table 23: Comparison of interconnection possibilities for RETRACK – TransSib corridor 73 Table 24: Comparison of interconnection possibilities for RETRACK – Central corridor 74 Table 25: Comparison of interconnection possibilities for RETRACK – TRACECA corridor 74 Table 26: Principal Market players in container transport via Transsiberian corridor 91 Table 27: Length of the TransSib corridor sections up to the Russian border 94 Table 28: Characteristics of the
Recommended publications
  • Post-Glacial Flooding of the Bering Land Bridge Dated to 11 Cal Ka BP Based on New Geophysical and Sediment Records

    Post-Glacial Flooding of the Bering Land Bridge Dated to 11 Cal Ka BP Based on New Geophysical and Sediment Records

    Clim. Past, 13, 991–1005, 2017 https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-13-991-2017 © Author(s) 2017. This work is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License. Post-glacial flooding of the Bering Land Bridge dated to 11 cal ka BP based on new geophysical and sediment records Martin Jakobsson1, Christof Pearce1,2, Thomas M. Cronin3, Jan Backman1, Leif G. Anderson4, Natalia Barrientos1, Göran Björk4, Helen Coxall1, Agatha de Boer1, Larry A. Mayer5, Carl-Magnus Mörth1, Johan Nilsson6, Jayne E. Rattray1, Christian Stranne1,5, Igor Semiletov7,8, and Matt O’Regan1 1Department of Geological Sciences and Bolin Centre for Climate Research, Stockholm University, 10691 Stockholm, Sweden 2Department of Geoscience, Aarhus University, 8000 Aarhus, Denmark 3US Geological Survey MS926A, Reston, Virginia 20192, USA 4Department of Marine Sciences, University of Gothenburg, 412 96 Gothenburg, Sweden 5Center for Coastal and Ocean Mapping, University of New Hampshire, Durham, New Hampshire 03824, USA 6Department of Meteorology, Stockholm University, 106 91 Stockholm, Sweden 7Pacific Oceanological Institute, Far Eastern Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 690041 Vladivostok, Russia 8Tomsk Polytechnic University, Tomsk, Russia Correspondence to: Martin Jakobsson ([email protected]) Received: 26 January 2017 – Discussion started: 13 February 2017 Accepted: 1 July 2017 – Published: 1 August 2017 Abstract. The Bering Strait connects the Arctic and Pacific Strait and the submergence of the large Bering Land Bridge. oceans and separates the North American and Asian land- Although the precise rates of sea level rise cannot be quanti- masses. The presently shallow ( ∼ 53 m) strait was exposed fied, our new results suggest that the late deglacial sea level during the sea level lowstand of the last glacial period, which rise was rapid and occurred after the end of the Younger permitted human migration across a land bridge today re- Dryas stadial.
  • XII International Conference on Transport Infrastructure of the Siberian Region (Sibintrans-2021) (Irkutsk - Krasnoyarsk, Russia, 6-8 October 2021)

    XII International Conference on Transport Infrastructure of the Siberian Region (Sibintrans-2021) (Irkutsk - Krasnoyarsk, Russia, 6-8 October 2021)

    INFORMATION LETTER about XII International Conference on Transport Infrastructure of the Siberian Region (SibInTrans-2021) (Irkutsk - Krasnoyarsk, Russia, 6-8 October 2021) Irkutsk State University of Railway Transport and Krasnoyarsk Science and Technology City Hall with the support of the Government of the Irkutsk Region and the Russian Federal Agency for Rail Transport are organizing XII International Scientific Conference on Transport Infrastructure of the Siberian Region (SibInTrans-2021). The Conference will take place in Irkutsk and Krasnoyarsk on 6-8 October, 2021. Admiral Makarov State University of Maritime and Inland Shipping (Saint-Petersburg, Russia), Siberian Transport University (Novosibirsk, Russia), Irkutsk scientific center of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences (Irkutsk, Russia), East Siberian Railway (Russia), The Ulaanbaatar Railway (Mongolia), East China Jiaotong University (China), Seoul National University of Science and Technology (South Korea), Belarussian State University of Transport (Gomel, Belarus) and Belarusian- Russian University (Mogilev, Belarus) are partner organizations and universities of the Conference. We invite scientists, specialists and research teams as well as representatives of the enterprises working in the spheres of transport infrastructure development for sustainable development of territories to participate in the Conference. The purpose of the Conference is to share the experience of leading experts in the application of innovative technologies, mathematical and computational
  • Ports and Logistics Scoping Study in CAREC Countries 3Rd Proof.Indd

    Ports and Logistics Scoping Study in CAREC Countries 3Rd Proof.Indd

    Ports and Logistics Scoping Study in CAREC Countries CAREC countries rely upon open-sea ports of third-party countries outside of their borders as conduits for their exports and imports. These open-sea ports are located mostly in non-CAREC countries and act as international oceanic trade nodes to connect CAREC freight moving on cross border railways, highways, inland sea shipping, and on river and canal barges. This Scoping Study analyses seaports and multimodal corridors serving CAREC landlocked countries. The purpose is to provide sufficient background to ports and logistics developments in the region and identify areas and potential activities that will require cooperation among CAREC countries and development partners within the framework of the CAREC Program. About the Central Asia Regional Economic Cooperation Program The Central Asia Regional Economic Cooperation (CAREC) Program is a partnership of 11 member countries and development partners working together to promote development through cooperation, leading to accelerated economic growth and poverty reduction. It is guided by the overarching vision of “Good Neighbors, Good Partners, and Good Prospects.” CAREC countries include Afghanistan, Azerbaijan, the People’s Republic of China, Georgia, Kazakhstan, the Kyrgyz Republic, Mongolia, Pakistan, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, and Uzbekistan. PORTS AND LOGISTICS SCOPING STUDY IN CAREC COUNTRIES FEBRUARy 2021 ASIAN DEVELOPMENT BANK 6 ADB Avenue, Mandaluyong City 1550 Metro Manila, Philippines www.adb.org PORTS AND LOGISTICS SCOPING STUDY IN CAREC COUNTRIES FEBRUARy 2021 Contents Tables, Figures, and Boxes vi Preface viii Abbreviations ix Executive Summary xi 1. Introduction 1 1.1. Objective 1 1.2. Pertinence of a Ports and Logistics Scoping Study 1 1.3.
  • ART of CONTAINER LOGISTICS ABOUT the REPORT Statements Basedon Any Newinformationorsubsequentevents

    ART of CONTAINER LOGISTICS ABOUT the REPORT Statements Basedon Any Newinformationorsubsequentevents

    ANNUAL REPORT 2016 ART OF CONTAINER LOGISTICS Pages 2–13 14–23 24–35 36–79 80–147 Reporting period from 1 January 2016 to 31 December 2016. The report of the Public Joint Stock Company Center for Cargo Container Traffic TransContainer (TransContainer) for the year 2016 includes the results for TransContainer and its subsidiaries within the Group. The composition of the Group and its equity interest in TransContainer are shown in the Consolidated Financial Statements for 2016. The data in the 2016 Annual Report have been consolidated in accordance with Order No. 3533-U of the Bank of Russia, dated 15 January 2015, the MICEX Stock Exchange Procedure for Providing Information and Reports, dated 11 August 2015, the Corporate Governance Code, dated 23 December 2016, FRC UK Guidance and the GRI Standards Sustainability Reporting Guidelines. The information provided in the report has been subjected to an internal audit and preliminarily reviewed by the Audit Committee and the Nominations and ABOUT THE REPORT THE ABOUT Remuneration Committee of the Company’s Board of Directors. PROFILE COMPANY REPORT STRATEGIC OVERVIEWMARKET OVERVIEWBUSINESS GOVERNANCECORPORATE Disclaimer CONTENTS This annual report (the “Annual Report”) has been prepared using the information available to the Center for Cargo Container Traffic 1 COMPANY PROFILE 5 CORPORATE GOVERNANCE 6 FINANCIAL REPORT TransContainer (the “Company”) and its subsidiaries (the “Group”) at the time of its preparation, including information obtained from Business model 4 Message from the Chairman Directors’ responsibility statement 148 third parties. The Company reasonably believes that the information in the Annual Report was complete and accurate as of the time of its of the Board of Directors 82 publication.
  • World Bank Document

    World Bank Document

    Document of The World Bank FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Public Disclosure Authorized Report No: 41755 - AZ PROJECT APPRAISAL DOCUMENT Public Disclosure Authorized ON A PROPOSED LOAN IN THE AMOUNT OF US$450 MILLION TO THE REPUBLIC OF AZERBAIJAN FOR A Public Disclosure Authorized RAIL TRADE AND TRANSPORT FACILITATION PROJECT February 28,2008 Sustainable Development Department South Caucasus Country Unit Europe and Central Asia Region Public Disclosure Authorized This document has a restricted distribution and may be used by recipients only in the performance of their official duties. Its contents may not otherwise be disclosed without World Bank authorization. CURRENCY EQUJYALENTS (Exchange Rate Effective October 1, 2007) Currency Unit = AZN (Azeri New Manats) AZN0.8531 = US$1 FISCAL YEAR January 1 - December 31 ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRl NYMS ACG Azeri-C hirag-Gunashli I IAS International Accounting Standards AC Alternating Current I IBRD International Bank for Reconstruction and Development ADB Asian Development Bank ICB International Competitive Bidding ADDY Azerbaijan Railway IDA International Development Association AZN Azerbaijan New Manat IF1 International Financial Institution BTC Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan IFRS International Financial Reporting Standards CAPSAP Corporate and Public Sector IRR Internal Rate of Return Accountability Project CFAA Country Financial Accountability kPh Kilometer per hour Assessment CIS Commonwealth of Independent States LCS Least Cost Selection CPAR Country Procurement Assessment MED Ministry of Economic Development CPS
  • The Bulletin № 1 Symposium

    The Bulletin № 1 Symposium

    INTRODUCTION THEMES Government Sakhalin Region Construction of infrastructure and transport structures in complicated The Symposium themes are geo-monitoring; modeling and prognosis of Far Eastern Railway geological conditions and to be safe under natural disasters is a very natural and emergency situations; preventive geotechnical measures for The Russian Academy of Architecture and challenging task and demands cooperating efforts from scientists, designers disaster reduction. and contractors. Complicated geotechnical problems are confronted under 1.Use geomaterials for construction and reconstruction transportation objets Construction Sciences conditions of high probability of earthquakes, landslides, mud flows, snow 2. Geomonitoring, modeling of geodynamic processes, prognoses of International Geosyntetical Society avalanches, flooding and other hazardous phenomena such as break of natural phenomena: dams, underground mountain row collapsing, a large-scale and intensive oil - earthquakes, tsunamis, typhoons; International Technical Committee №4 and gas leakage, industrial and terrorist explosions and other - landslids, mud flows, volcanic eruptions, floodings; of Earthquake Geotechnical Engineering and techno/antropogenic impacts. The International Technical Committee 203 - soil liquefaction, scuffling, swelling, freezing of the soil bases. of Earthquake Geotechnical Engineering and Associated Problems 3. Geotechnical measures for natural disaster reduction of: Associated Problems (TC203) (TC203); International Technical Committee
  • Years Ago, We Focused on Transshipment of 12 Million Tonnes

    Years Ago, We Focused on Transshipment of 12 Million Tonnes

    11 September 2020 The project is supported by the Far East Investment and Export Agency (ANO API) and the Far East Development Corporation (FEDC). On 11 September, General Director of Vanino Bulk Terminal, Vladimir Dolgopolov, and General Director of JSC Far East Development Corporation (FEDC), Dmitry Tetenkin, signed an agreement on the implementation of a project under the Free port of Vladivostok scheme at the enterprise's site in Toki village, Vaninsky district. The project to expand the terminal's capacity to 40 million tonnes is planned to be implemented by 2024. The planned volume of investments under the Free port of Vladivostok scheme is about RUB 12 billion. The project will create 79 new jobs. Deputy General Director - Director of Logistics of JSC SUEK, Denis Ilatovsky, emphasised: "When launching the terminal 15 years ago, we focused on transshipment of 12 million tonnes per year, and with the development of approaches to the Vanino port and the construction of the Russian Railways Kuznetsovsky tunnel, we expanded the capacity to 24 million tonnes, and now plan to further expand it to 40 million tonnes. This is certainly the result of our close and productive cooperation with Russian Railways. We see how technologies are changing in the Eastern Polygon, and how the most advanced solutions and innovative technical tools are being introduced. New administrative and managerial approaches are being applied. Among the latest achievements of the Far Eastern Railway, the Directorate of Traction of Russian Railways, I would like to note the daily guaranteed supply of 7 heavy trains weighing 7100 to the Toki station for unloading at our terminal.
  • Workers' Alliance Against Forced Labour and Trafficking

    Workers' Alliance Against Forced Labour and Trafficking

    165˚W 150˚W 135˚W 120˚W 105˚W 90˚W 75˚W 60˚W 45˚W 30˚W 15˚W 0˚ 15˚E 30˚E 45˚E 60˚E 75˚E 90˚E 105˚E 120˚E 135˚E 150˚E 165˚E Workers' Alliance against Forced Labour and Tracking Chelyuskin Mould Bay Grise Dudas Fiord Severnaya Zemlya 75˚N Arctic Ocean Arctic Ocean 75˚N Resolute Industrialised Countries and Transition Economies Queen Elizabeth Islands Greenland Sea Svalbard Dickson Human tracking is an important issue in industrialised countries (including North Arctic Bay America, Australia, Japan and Western Europe) with 270,000 victims, which means three Novosibirskiye Ostrova Pond LeptevStarorybnoye Sea Inlet quarters of the total number of forced labourers. In transition economies, more than half Novaya Zemlya Yukagir Sachs Harbour Upernavikof the Kujalleo total number of forced labourers - 200,000 persons - has been tracked. Victims are Tiksi Barrow mainly women, often tracked intoGreenland prostitution. Workers are mainly forced to work in agriculture, construction and domestic servitude. Middle East and North Africa Wainwright Hammerfest Ittoqqortoormiit Prudhoe Kaktovik Cape Parry According to the ILO estimate, there are 260,000 people in forced labour in this region, out Bay The “Red Gold, from ction to reality” campaign of the Italian Federation of Agriculture and Siktyakh Baffin Bay Tromso Pevek Cambridge Zapolyarnyy of which 88 percent for labour exploitation. Migrant workers from poor Asian countriesT alnakh Nikel' Khabarovo Dudinka Val'kumey Beaufort Sea Bay Taloyoak Food Workers (FLAI) intervenes directly in tomato production farms in the south of Italy. Severomorsk Lena Tuktoyaktuk Murmansk became victims of unscrupulous recruitment agencies and brokers that promise YeniseyhighN oril'sk Great Bear L.
  • Investment Activities

    Investment Activities

    About the company Strategic report Performance overview Investment activities Investment programme approaches The Company’s investment programme The projects’ commercial efficiency Budget efficiency for projects is assessed is designed to: is assessed based on the net cash flow based on comparison of cash inflows (tax, • ensure uninterrupted transportation from investing and operating activities, customs and insurance payments) resulting service; with the resulting estimates taking into from railway infrastructure development • embrace the most promising projects consideration the financial aftermaths vs government-financed investments. in terms of both commercial and budget for the investment project owner assuming efficiency; that such owner fully covers the project • minimise federal government spending costs and reaps all of its benefits. on investment projects. Russian Railways has uniform guidelines in place to assess the efficiency All the investment projects have of investment projects1. With a payback commercial and budget efficiency period of up to 20 years and an IRR estimates in place and are ranked using of at least 10%, an investment project the cost/benefit analysis. is deemed to be sufficiently efficient. 1. In accordance with the Russian Government’s Order No. 2991-r dated 29 December 2017. 76 Russian Railways Sustainable development Corporate governance Appendices Investment highlights in 2019 As adjusted by the Board of Directors PROJECTS INCLUDED the target was met with 115.8 mt of cargo of Russian Railways, the Company’s
  • Trans-Baykal (Rusya) Bölgesi'nin Coğrafyasi

    Trans-Baykal (Rusya) Bölgesi'nin Coğrafyasi

    International Journal of Geography and Geography Education (IGGE) To Cite This Article: Can, R. R. (2021). Geography of the Trans-Baykal (Russia) region. International Journal of Geography and Geography Education (IGGE), 43, 365-385. Submitted: October 07, 2020 Revised: November 01, 2020 Accepted: November 16, 2020 GEOGRAPHY OF THE TRANS-BAYKAL (RUSSIA) REGION Trans-Baykal (Rusya) Bölgesi’nin Coğrafyası Reyhan Rafet CAN1 Öz Zabaykalskiy Kray (Bölge) olarak isimlendirilen saha adını Rus kâşiflerin ilk kez 1640’ta karşılaştıkları Daur halkından alır. Rusçada Zabaykalye, Balkal Gölü’nün doğusu anlamına gelir. Trans-Baykal Bölgesi, Sibirya'nın en güneydoğusunda, doğu Trans-Baykal'ın neredeyse tüm bölgesini işgal eder. Bölge şiddetli iklim koşulları; birçok mineral ve hammadde kaynağı; ormanların ve tarım arazilerinin varlığı ile karakterize edilir. Rusya Federasyonu'nun Uzakdoğu Federal Bölgesi’nin bir parçası olan on bir kurucu kuruluşu arasında bölge, alan açısından altıncı, nüfus açısından dördüncü, bölgesel ürün üretimi açısından (GRP) altıncı sıradadır. Bölge topraklarından geçen Trans-Sibirya Demiryolu yalnızca Uzak Doğu ile Rusya'nın batı bölgeleri arasında bir ulaşım bağlantısı değil, aynı zamanda Avrasya geçişini sağlayan küresel altyapının da bir parçasıdır. Bölgenin üretim yapısında sanayi, tarım ve ulaşım yüksek bir paya sahiptir. Bu çalışmada Trans-Baykal Bölgesi’nin fiziki, beşeri ve ekonomik coğrafya özellikleri ele alınmıştır. Trans-Baykal Bölgesinin coğrafi özelliklerinin yanı sıra, ekonomik ve kültürel yapısını incelenmiştir. Bu kapsamda konu ile ilgili kurumsal raporlardan ve alan araştırmalarından yararlanılmıştır. Bu çalışma sonucunda 350 yıldan beri Rus gelenek, kültür ve yaşam tarzının devam ettiği, farklı etnik grupların toplumsal birliği sağladığı, yer altı kaynaklarının bölge ekonomisi için yüzyıllardır olduğu gibi günümüzde de önem arz ettiği, coğrafyasının halkın yaşam şeklini belirdiği sonucuna varılmıştır.
  • The Less-Splendid Isolation of the South American Continent

    The Less-Splendid Isolation of the South American Continent

    news and update ISSN 1948-6596 commentary The less-splendid isolation of the South American continent Only few biogeographic scenarios capture the im- lower Central America (Costa Rica) and South agination as much as the closure of the Isthmus of America (northern Colombia), and that some Panama. The establishment of this connection snapping shrimp populations were already split ended the “splendid isolation” of the South Amer- long before the Isthmus had finally closed (most ican continent (Simpson 1980), a continent that between 7–10 mya but some >15 mya). Next to had been unconnected to any other land mass for this, several papers showed that plants also mi- over 50 million years. When the Isthmus rose out grated between North and South America prior to of the water some 3 million years ago (mya) the the closure of the Isthmus (e.g., Erkens et al. 2007, Great American Biotic Interchange started. Since Bacon et al. 2013), although for plants it is difficult terrestrial biotic interchange was no longer to rule out that this happened via long-distance blocked by the Central American Seaway, dispersal. Thus, the new findings of Montes and (asymmetrical) invasion of taxa across this new colleagues fit much better with a wealth of evi- land bridge transformed biodiversity in North as dence from the biological realm that has been well as South America (Leigh et al. 2014). Or so amassed over the last years, than the old model of the story goes. a relatively rapid rise of the Isthmus. A recent paper by Montes et al. (2015) casts If the land-bridge was available much earli- further serious doubt on this scenario from a geo- er to many terrestrial organisms, the question that logical perspective.
  • Container and Multimodal Railway Transportations in Russia Commissioned By

    Container and Multimodal Railway Transportations in Russia Commissioned By

    Ruslan Aliev CONTAINER AND MULTIMODAL RAILWAY TRANSPORTATIONS IN RUSSIA Bachelor’s thesis Degree Programme in Business Logistics 2020 Author Degree Time Ruslan Aliev Degree Programme April 2020 in Business Logistics Thesis title 67 pages Container and multimodal railway transportations in Russia Commissioned by Kouvola Innovation Oy Supervisor Jouni Ropponen Abstract Railway container transportation is one of the fastest-growing areas of the transport industry in Russia. Even though Russia is not a leading country in terms of the share of container transport by rail today, it gives them very important strategic importance. With its vast geographical area, Russia has very good opportunities for becoming a transport giant. Container and multimodal rail transportation in Russia and the prospects for their further development were studied in this thesis including current situation of rail container transportation in Russia, positions of the transport system of Russia in the world, current trends of the Russian transport market, role of the state in modernizing railway infrastructure and the technologies that are used in railway container transportation. In addition, the Kouvola-Xi'an route was analyzed in detail. In the study, both qualitative and quantitative methods of analysis were used. Quantitative methods were used to formalize statistics for a clear understanding of the topic and qualitative methods were employed in the form of interviews found on the Internet and annual reports of companies. The paper showed that Russia has great potential for increasing freight traffic, especially in transit. The continuous work to modernize the infrastructure will most likely lead to an increase in freight traffic. Innovation is an important component for development.