DOCSLIB.ORG

Download Article (PDF)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Download Article (PDF) IOW001ICAlJUIIVEY . :: .. :::: ,.: ~ Memoirs Volume 21 (No. 3) ANIMAL REMAINS FROM BRAHMAGIRI ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITE (KARNATAKA) AND THEIR RELEVANCE TO THE ANCIENT CIVILIZATION T., K. PAL and B. T ALUKDER Zoological Survey oj India, M-Block, New A Lipore, Kolkata-700 053, India e-mail: [email protected] INTRODUCTION During 1940s notable advances in the Neolithic archaeology was made through the first systematic The archaeology of India south of the Vindhyas, excavation at Brahmagiri, Maski and Sanganakallu. the Deccan or peninsular India documented 'The (irst account of excavation at Brahmagiri by distinctive elements and that has revealed a M.H. Krishna came out in 1943 and the report of chronology of cultures characteristically different Wheeler's excavation was published in 1947. from the prehistoric civilizations in other parts of the Indian subcontinent. Wheeler in 1940s, after LOCATION recovery of interesting objects of hitherto unknown 0 I1lltural phase in Arikamedu near Pondicherry, The ancient cultural site at B rah magi ri (12 22" 0 eonceptualized a coordinated plan for 'opening up' Nand 75 28' E) is situated at about 30 miles the archaeology of South India and initiated the (48.28 km) south of Bellary in the Molakalmalu Taluk of Chitaldurg District of Kamataka State venture with the excavations at Brahmagiri and (see Text-Fig. 1). Brahmagiri is a granitic outcrop, Chandravalli in Kamataka. This regio!' has become rising about 600 ft. (182.88 m.) above the plain. the focus of the Neolithic archaeology in the post­ At the foot of the granite outcrop in the vicinity of Wheeler era and the 'Southern Neolithic' was Asoka's Minor Rock Edict No.1 had a township considered to be a distinctive regional assemblage of Isila, mentioned in the edict. M.H. Krishna in in India (Krishnaswami, 1959, 1960; Allchin & 1940s carried out trial excavations not only in this Allchin, 1968; Thapar, t 974, t 978; SankaIia, 1977; township but also in the large number of Megalithic Settar and Korisettar, 2002). A characteristically cists surrounding the old township in the plain. The distinctive aspect of this culture becomes the northern slope of Brahmagiri, covered largely by 'ashmound' sites which consist of large heaped a tumbled mass of granite boulders bore enough accumulations of ash and vitrified material (Zeuner, signs of ancient occupation comprising potsherds, 1959; Allchin, t 961, t 963a; Mujumder & Rajguru, fragmentary wall, remains of small terraced 1966; Paddayya, 1973, 1991-92). These sites to platforms and dry stone walling. A 200 yards some extent overlap in time with the 'Chalcolithic (182.88 m.) wide long strip with a mass of cultures' of the northern Deccan (Maharastra). occupation earth and sherds was noticed in the 2 MEMOIRS VOLUME 21 NO.3 BEHKANiAlU • MALLUR• + ·s. KOOE e 6AUOUR ,.' eWANDAlU i ~6UNT1 .' eBUDNI KALLUR 0 [JRAICHUR. O,lLAMRAYAN ~f(UM)1 GUOOA f OWATGAl M YS 0 R E PlCl.ltAl• ~UOEJ(Attu RODALKUNDA 0 P R A DES H ''', OPATTlkONDA SAHAYASPurt- \ __APUR I(UPGAl", 6A0IG~ ~A IS~NAKAL "\ K~lA.. e ., ; o GUNT AKAl KUOATN .... DBEllARY i ~ j ___--.--------t HAl.AJ(UNDI i DISTRmUTION OF SITES ,... " ~; o MODERN TOWNS i : .... _.-.-. ~ • ASH MOUNDS .-.-~ <1' .. 1 '" o PRl«:FAl NEOUTHIC SETTlEMENfS j ® SETTlEMENTS WITH ASH MOUNDS i + ASH ~CLE GRAVES 010 2030 405060 BRAHMAGR 0 i ~ SCAlE OF Kl.0METRES Fig. 1. Distribution of different Neolithic sites and ashmounds in Karnataka (Mysore) and adjacent areas (after ~ettar and Korisettar, 2002). • Sto n e A ge 1 A II Sto n e A ge 1 B o Megalithic 'OAndhra Fig. 2. Relative availability of animal remai~s (AAR) (inner circle) and number of animal species (NAS) (outer circle) in the ,Stone Axe 1 A, Stone Axe I B, Megalitltic. and Andhra cultures of Brahmagiri. PAL & 'TALUKDER : Animal Remains from Brahmagiri Archaeological Site (Kamataka) 3 place. Apart from this structure ,cist tombs ,and in this area. Many of thes,e were removed for Meg,alithic remainswefe found Ito a depth of about ,agricultural practices by the modem people but 500 yards (457.20 m.) for about a mile (1.60 km) quite a few sUfviv,ed tin Krishna's excavation. ,Fig. 3. View of Brahmagiri Archaeo,logica. si ' te ~ FOl1egfound right hand comer : Cuttings Dr, 21 ~ 23 (After Wheder, 1959), HISTORY OF EXCAVATION AND the most coherent surviving M,egaHthic 'monument ,sU,CCESSION OF HUMAN CULTURES of Isila township. This trial pits were sunk ,at the In 1947 the Archaeolo,gical Survey of India western foot but the most productiv'e area w,as (ASI) in coHaboration with the Archaeolgical situated towards north-east, in sites, Br. 21, Br. 22 Departm,eQJ Qf Mysore state (earlier name of and Br. 21, where three main cultures viz., (~) . .. .... Karnataka) c,arried out more scientific at Brahmagiri stone Axe, . (ii) Megalithic and (iii) Brahmagiri su~sequent to the primary ex<cav.ation Andhra cultures were found in distinct succession. by the Archaeological Depertment of Mysore In the sit,e Br. 17, only Stone Axe phase w,as state. The main objective of the excav,ationwas observ'ed. To the east of these sites at least ten to find out the correlation -of a typical M,egalithic Megalithic structures were explored. The pits were ,culture with the cultures <of an adjacent urban site dug mostly in the form of single or conjoined 20 with a definable chronological datum-line. There ft. squares (1.85 sq. m.) or 400 sq. ft. (37.l6 sq.m.) was a brick ,chaitya on the hin side and that was area . 4 MEMOIRS VOLUME 2) NO.3 The sequence of cultures revealed by these pits, equipments. Polished stone axes and microliths, from bottom to top, was as .follows : recovered occasionally at this level, were probably I. The Brahmagiri Stone Axe culture-A the overlaps of the earlier culture. The age was crude chalcolithic culture extending to a height of considered to be after c.200 B.C. to the middle of about 9 ft. (2.74 m.) from the natural surface. It the First century A.D., overlapping the Andhra was subdivided into IA (early) and IB (late). culture. II. The Megalithic culture-An Iron Age III. The Andhra Culture-This culture was culture identical with that of the local Megalithic characterized by a far more sophisticated ceramics tombs and pit circles, extending to a further height normally turned on fast wheels. Its most of 3-4 ft. (0.91-1.2] m.). characteristic pottery was a range of types, III. The Andhra culture-The cu lture that occasionally salt-glazed with rectilinear decoration extended from the surface, a further height of 2.5 in white pigment under a wash of russet-coloured to 3.5 ft. (0.76-1.06 m.). ochre. The age was considered to be about the middle of the First century A.D. to Third century The three cultures, I-III, were interlocked by A.D. marked overlaps. ANIMAL REMAINS RECOVERED AGE OF THE CULTURES AND THEIR FROM BRAHMAGIRI CHARACTERISTIC FEATURES ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITE Wheeler (1947) gave chronology and Many animal remains along with the objects of characteristics of the past occupation of the town­ archaeological importance were recovered from site at Brahmagiri as follows : the excavations of 1947 by the ASI and the I. The Brahmagiri Stone Axe Culture­ Archaeology Department of Mysore State. The This culture was characterized by the presence animal remains were sent to the Zoological Survey of polished pointed-butt axes of Trap rock. These of India (ZSI) for examination. Earlier, Nath (1963) axes were associated with numerous crude worked out skeletal parts of some animals obtained microlithis of jasper, flint, agate, common opal, rock during the excavations. Systematic inventories of crystal etc. No iron was recovered in association the available animal remains preserved in the ZSI with this culture. The age of the culture was are documented here and their relevance in the considered to be early First millennium B.C. to past societies is discussed in the present paper. the beginning of the Second century B.C., The zoological-taxonomical analysis of the continuing as a dwindling subculture through most animal remains is presented in the Table 1. of the succeeding Megalithic phase. II. The Megalithic Culture-This culture SYSTEMATIC ACCOUNT OF ANIMAL was considered to be intrusive and first introduced REMAINS iron-working in the human folk of the locality. These were represented with tools and weapons. The animal remains of Brahmagiri Iron sickles, knives, swords, spears, arrow-heads archaeological site are worked out and the result and wedges were recovered amongst the cultural of it is presented in Table 1. PAL & TALUKDER : Animal Remains from Brahmagiri Archaeological Site (Karnataka) 5 Table 1. Systematic analysis of animal remains recovered from Brahmagiri archaeological site. Culture: Early Stone Axe (1 A) Name of No. of Identity of Material Site (Dr.) I Condition of Species Material Locus (L)I Material Stratum (S) Equus sp. I 51h cervical vertebra without transverse Br. 22;.L-I-N; process S-15 Sub adult Lepus 1 Proximal fragment of right tibia " Broken lligricollis I Distal fragment of right humerus with medial " " Cuvier and lateral condyles 1 Distal fragment of right tibia " " Bos illdiclts 1 Proximal fragment of right metatarsus with Br. 21; L-? " Linn. fused scaphoid and cuboid of proximal tarsal S-19 and fused 2nd and 3rd cuniform I Proximal fragment of right 3rd and 4th metatarsal " " 1 Distal fragment of 3rd and 4th metacarpal " " I Neural arch of thoracic vertebra without spine " " 1 Right upper 3rd premolar " " I Body of thoracic vertebra " " 5 Fragments of ribs " .. ., 1 Body of thoracic vertebra with a portion of " transverse process 1 Fragment of shaft of ulna with part of radius " " I Proximal fragment of right ulna with olecranon Br.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Western Ghats & Sri Lanka Biodiversity Hotspot
    Ecosystem Profile WESTERN GHATS & SRI LANKA BIODIVERSITY HOTSPOT WESTERN GHATS REGION FINAL VERSION MAY 2007 Prepared by: Kamal S. Bawa, Arundhati Das and Jagdish Krishnaswamy (Ashoka Trust for Research in Ecology & the Environment - ATREE) K. Ullas Karanth, N. Samba Kumar and Madhu Rao (Wildlife Conservation Society) in collaboration with: Praveen Bhargav, Wildlife First K.N. Ganeshaiah, University of Agricultural Sciences Srinivas V., Foundation for Ecological Research, Advocacy and Learning incorporating contributions from: Narayani Barve, ATREE Sham Davande, ATREE Balanchandra Hegde, Sahyadri Wildlife and Forest Conservation Trust N.M. Ishwar, Wildlife Institute of India Zafar-ul Islam, Indian Bird Conservation Network Niren Jain, Kudremukh Wildlife Foundation Jayant Kulkarni, Envirosearch S. Lele, Centre for Interdisciplinary Studies in Environment & Development M.D. Madhusudan, Nature Conservation Foundation Nandita Mahadev, University of Agricultural Sciences Kiran M.C., ATREE Prachi Mehta, Envirosearch Divya Mudappa, Nature Conservation Foundation Seema Purshothaman, ATREE Roopali Raghavan, ATREE T. R. Shankar Raman, Nature Conservation Foundation Sharmishta Sarkar, ATREE Mohammed Irfan Ullah, ATREE and with the technical support of: Conservation International-Center for Applied Biodiversity Science Assisted by the following experts and contributors: Rauf Ali Gladwin Joseph Uma Shaanker Rene Borges R. Kannan B. Siddharthan Jake Brunner Ajith Kumar C.S. Silori ii Milind Bunyan M.S.R. Murthy Mewa Singh Ravi Chellam Venkat Narayana H. Sudarshan B.A. Daniel T.S. Nayar R. Sukumar Ranjit Daniels Rohan Pethiyagoda R. Vasudeva Soubadra Devy Narendra Prasad K. Vasudevan P. Dharma Rajan M.K. Prasad Muthu Velautham P.S. Easa Asad Rahmani Arun Venkatraman Madhav Gadgil S.N. Rai Siddharth Yadav T. Ganesh Pratim Roy Santosh George P.S.
    [Show full text]
  • The Krishna Temple Complex, Hampi: an Exploration of Its Identity As a Medieval Temple in the Contemporary Context
    THE KRISHNA TEMPLE COMPLEX, HAMPI: AN EXPLORATION OF ITS IDENTITY AS A MEDIEVAL TEMPLE IN THE CONTEMPORARY CONTEXT A Thesis Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of Cornell University In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts by Ashima Krishna January, 2009 © 2009 Ashima Krishna ABSTRACT Hindu temples in India have been in abundance for centuries. However, many have lost their use over time. They lie vacant and unused on vast tracts of land across the Indian subcontinent, in a time when financial resources for the provision of amenities to serve the local community are hard to come by. In the case of Hampi, this strain is felt not only by the community inhabiting the area, but the tourism sector as well. Hampi’s immense significance as a unique Medieval-city in the Indian subcontinent has increased tourist influx into the region, and added pressure on authorities to provide for amenities and facilities that can sustain the tourism industry. The site comprises near-intact Medieval structures, ruins in stone and archaeologically sensitive open land, making provision of tourist facilities extremely difficult. This raises the possibility of reusing one of the abundant temple structures to cater to some of these needs, akin to the Virupaksha Temple Complex and the Hampi Bazaar. But can it be done? There is a significant absence of research on possibilities of reusing a Hindu Temple. A major reason for this gap in scholarship has been due to the nature of the religion of Hinduism and its adherents. Communal and political forces over time have consistently viewed all Hindu temples as cultural patrimony of the people, despite legal ownership resting with the Government of India.
    [Show full text]
  • Detailed Species Accounts from The
    Threatened Birds of Asia: The BirdLife International Red Data Book Editors N. J. COLLAR (Editor-in-chief), A. V. ANDREEV, S. CHAN, M. J. CROSBY, S. SUBRAMANYA and J. A. TOBIAS Maps by RUDYANTO and M. J. CROSBY Principal compilers and data contributors ■ BANGLADESH P. Thompson ■ BHUTAN R. Pradhan; C. Inskipp, T. Inskipp ■ CAMBODIA Sun Hean; C. M. Poole ■ CHINA ■ MAINLAND CHINA Zheng Guangmei; Ding Changqing, Gao Wei, Gao Yuren, Li Fulai, Liu Naifa, Ma Zhijun, the late Tan Yaokuang, Wang Qishan, Xu Weishu, Yang Lan, Yu Zhiwei, Zhang Zhengwang. ■ HONG KONG Hong Kong Bird Watching Society (BirdLife Affiliate); H. F. Cheung; F. N. Y. Lock, C. K. W. Ma, Y. T. Yu. ■ TAIWAN Wild Bird Federation of Taiwan (BirdLife Partner); L. Liu Severinghaus; Chang Chin-lung, Chiang Ming-liang, Fang Woei-horng, Ho Yi-hsian, Hwang Kwang-yin, Lin Wei-yuan, Lin Wen-horn, Lo Hung-ren, Sha Chian-chung, Yau Cheng-teh. ■ INDIA Bombay Natural History Society (BirdLife Partner Designate) and Sálim Ali Centre for Ornithology and Natural History; L. Vijayan and V. S. Vijayan; S. Balachandran, R. Bhargava, P. C. Bhattacharjee, S. Bhupathy, A. Chaudhury, P. Gole, S. A. Hussain, R. Kaul, U. Lachungpa, R. Naroji, S. Pandey, A. Pittie, V. Prakash, A. Rahmani, P. Saikia, R. Sankaran, P. Singh, R. Sugathan, Zafar-ul Islam ■ INDONESIA BirdLife International Indonesia Country Programme; Ria Saryanthi; D. Agista, S. van Balen, Y. Cahyadin, R. F. A. Grimmett, F. R. Lambert, M. Poulsen, Rudyanto, I. Setiawan, C. Trainor ■ JAPAN Wild Bird Society of Japan (BirdLife Partner); Y. Fujimaki; Y. Kanai, H.
    [Show full text]
  • A Study on Ancient Artifacts Around Badami Hill and Their Correlation with the Natural Rock Arch Of
    A Study on Ancient Artifacts Around Badami Hill and Their Correlation with the Natural Rock Arch of Sidlaphadi SHORT REPORT PRADIPTA BANERJEE MAYUR BAJAJ *Author affiliations can be found in the back matter of this article ABSTRACT CORRESPONDING AUTHOR: Pradipta Banerjee The Badami hill of Bagalkot district, Karnataka, India, houses a large rock arch termed Dayananda Sagar University, IN “Sidlaphadi” that was used as a shelter by primitive man. The hill was searched to [email protected] find any prehistoric artifact that would act as a directional marker towards the arch. An interesting structure was noted in one of the natural caves near the southwestern part of the hill at 15°55’06”N latitude and 75°41’02”E longitude. A miniature replica TO CITE THIS ARTICLE: of the arch was carved onto the floor of the cave. The axis of the miniature bridge Banerjee, P and Bajaj, M. 2021. made an angle of 28.5 ± 1.5° with the 75°41’02”E longitude. The axis, upon extension A Study on Ancient Artifacts eastwards at the defining angle reaches the northern slope of Sidlaphadi. The authors Around Badami Hill and Their also located a megalithic stone arrangement in the northern part of the hill that had Correlation with the Natural a pointed capstone and was thought to be oriented towards the rock arch. The stone Rock Arch of Sidlaphadi. Ancient Asia, 12: 9, pp. 1–9. arrangement was in the same latitude as that of the Sidlaphadi site, but the capstone DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/ ° ° was oriented 22 E towards the winter solstice sunrise at 112.5 azimuth.
    [Show full text]
  • Summary-Report-On-Godavari-River
    Summary Report on the Source and Headwaters of the Godavari River, near Tryambakeshwar, India By Subijoy Dutta, P.E. Rivers of the World Foundation (http://rowfoundation.org ) Background: The Godavari originates 80 kilometres (50 mi) from the Arabian Sea in the Western Ghats of central India near Nasik in Maharashtra. It flows for 1,465 kilometres (910 mi), first eastwards across the Deccan Plateau then turns southeast, entering the West Godavari district and East Godavari district of Andhra Pradesh, until it splits into two watercourses that widen into a large river delta and flow into the Bay of Bengal. The Godavari River has a coverage area of 312,812 km2 (120,777 sq mi), which is nearly one-tenth of the area of India and is greater than the areas of England and Ireland put together. The river basin is considered to be divided into 3 sections: upper (source to confluence with Manjira), middle (between confluence of Manjira and Pranhita) and lower (Pranhita confluence to mouth). These put together account for 24.2% of the total basin area. The rivers annual average water inflows are nearly 110 billion cubic metres. Nearly 50% of the water availability is being harnessed. The water allocation from the river among the riparian states are governed by the Godavari Water Disputes Tribunal. The river has highest flood flows in India and experienced recorded flood of 3.6 million cusecs in the year 1986 and annual flood of 1.0 million cusecs is normal. The path of Godavari River 1 Visit to the source of Godavari, Tryambakeswar – Data collection and Observations: My first visit to the area was arranged during February 10-11, 2011 by Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Stone Axe Technology in Neolithic South India: New Evidence from the Sanganakallu-Kupgal Region) Mideastern Karnataka
    Stone Axe Technology in Neolithic South India: New Evidence from the Sanganakallu-Kupgal Region) Mideastern Karnataka ADAM BRUMM, NICOLE BOIVIN, RAVI KORISETTAR, JINU KOSHY, AND PAULA WHITTAKER THE TRANSITION TO AGRICULTURE-and to settled village life-occurred at dif­ ferent times in various parts of the world. Even within the Indian subcontinent, the Neolithic transition did not occur simultaneously across the entire region; rather, Neolithic "pockets" developed at different moments in certain key areas within the subcontinent. One such area is the South Deccan Plateau in South India, where the third millennium B.C. saw the development ofa novel Neolithic way of life that differed in crucial ways from Neolithic lifeways in other parts of the subcontinent (Allchin 1963). This tradition was marked by a particular focus on cattle and by the appearance of specific, perhaps ritual practices that featured the burning of large quantities of cow dung and the resultant creation of ash­ mounds in the landscape (Allchin 1963; Boivin 2004). This unique Neolithic tra­ dition, while still relatively poorly understood compared to Neolithic cultures in Europe and the Near East, has much to offer prehistorians attempting to under­ stand the changes that led to and accompanied domestication and sedentarization. It also has much to offer South Asian scholars who wish to gain a better apprecia­ tion of the changes that led to complexity, political economy, and state-level societies in South India (Boivin et al. 2005; Fuller et al. forthcoming). One key requirement for such studies is a better understanding of the material culture changes that attended the Neolithic transition, as well as the subsequent transition from the Neolithic to the Megalithic or Iron Age (see Table 1 for period designa­ tions and chronology).
    [Show full text]
  • Western Ghats
    Western Ghats From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia "Sahyadri" redirects here. For other uses, see Sahyadri (disambiguation). Western Ghats Sahyadri सहहदररद Western Ghats as seen from Gobichettipalayam, Tamil Nadu Highest point Peak Anamudi (Eravikulam National Park) Elevation 2,695 m (8,842 ft) Coordinates 10°10′N 77°04′E Coordinates: 10°10′N 77°04′E Dimensions Length 1,600 km (990 mi) N–S Width 100 km (62 mi) E–W Area 160,000 km2 (62,000 sq mi) Geography The Western Ghats lie roughly parallel to the west coast of India Country India States List[show] Settlements List[show] Biome Tropical and subtropical moist broadleaf forests Geology Period Cenozoic Type of rock Basalt and Laterite UNESCO World Heritage Site Official name: Natural Properties - Western Ghats (India) Type Natural Criteria ix, x Designated 2012 (36th session) Reference no. 1342 State Party India Region Indian subcontinent The Western Ghats are a mountain range that runs almost parallel to the western coast of the Indian peninsula, located entirely in India. It is a UNESCO World Heritage Site and is one of the eight "hottest hotspots" of biological diversity in the world.[1][2] It is sometimes called the Great Escarpment of India.[3] The range runs north to south along the western edge of the Deccan Plateau, and separates the plateau from a narrow coastal plain, called Konkan, along the Arabian Sea. A total of thirty nine properties including national parks, wildlife sanctuaries and reserve forests were designated as world heritage sites - twenty in Kerala, ten in Karnataka, five in Tamil Nadu and four in Maharashtra.[4][5] The range starts near the border of Gujarat and Maharashtra, south of the Tapti river, and runs approximately 1,600 km (990 mi) through the states of Maharashtra, Goa, Karnataka, Kerala and Tamil Nadu ending at Kanyakumari, at the southern tip of India.
    [Show full text]
  • Origins & Spread of Agriculture in India. Dorian Q Fuller 2008.4.18
    Origins & Spread of Agriculture in India. Dorian Q Fuller 2008.4.18 印度的农业起源和传播 Figure 1. The major independent Neolithic zones of South Asia, with selected archaeological sites. For each zones the solid grey outline indicates best guess region(s) for indigenous domestication processes and/or earliest adoption of agriculture. The dashed lines indicates the expanded region of related/derivative traditions of agriculture; selected sites plotted. 图一，南亚各新石器区分布，含主要遗址位置。实线范围为本地驯化的最可能区域或 最早接受农业的区域；虚线为这一传统的传播扩大区域 1. The northwestern zone, with the disjunct area of the Northern Neolithic shown: Mgr. Mehrgarh, Glg. Ghaleghay, Bzm. Burzahom, Gfk. Gufkral. 2. The middle Ganges zone with two possible rice domestication areas: Dmd. Damadama, Lhd. Lahuradewa, Mhg. Mahagara, Kjn. Kunjhun, Snr. Senuwar. 3. Eastern India/Orissan zone: Bnb. Banabasa, Kch. Kuchai, Gpr, Gopalpur, Gbsn. Golabai Sassan. 4. Gujarat and southern Aravalli zone: Ltw. Loteshwar, Rjd. Rojdi, Pdr. Padri, Btl. Balathal, Bgr. Bagor. 5. Southern Indian zone: Bdl. Budihal, Wtg. Watgal, Utr. Utnur, Sgk. Sanganakallu and Hiregudda, Hlr. Hallur, Ngr. Nagarajupalle. 1 Chronological Framework (based on Fuller 2006 Journal of World Prehistory 20: 1-86)印度 新石器－铜石并用时代编年 2 Table 1. Important domesticates in South Asia originating in the Near East 表一，近东起源传入南亚的驯化物种 Species Region and period of Earliest occurrence in Comments 备注 origin South Asia 最早出现 于南亚的地区年代 Wheat(s) Near Eastern fertile Mehrgarh, ca. 7000 BC Mehrgarh finds include Triticum spp.小麦 crescent, 9700-8000 primitive glume wheats BC (Triticum monococcum, T. diococcum) as well as derived free- threshing breadwheats (T. aestivum) Barley 大麦 Near Eastern fertile Mehrgarh, ca. 7000 BC Wild barley also Hordeum vulgare crescent, 9700-8000 reported at Mehrgarh, BC.
    [Show full text]
  • The Bellary District Archaeological Project
    Exploring Neolithic and Megalithic south India: the Bellary District archaeological project NICOLEBOIVIN, RAVI KORISETTAR, P.C. VENKATASUBBAIAH,HELEN LEWIS, DEEPAK HAVANUR, KALYANMALAGYANNAVAR & SUBHAS CHINCHOLI~ The southern part of the Indian peninsula is an area of the project made use of theoretical concepts of outstanding archaeological interest. While its and methodological approaches that have not historic cities and temples have long attracted the previously been applied in studies of south In- interest of both scholars and tourists, however, south dian prehistory, including symbolic and pheno- India’s equally remarkable prehistoric period remains menological approaches to understanding the have only rarely received the attention they deserve. perception and use of landscapes in the past. This A new joint Cambridge-Karnatak University re- research demonstrated that the location of sites, search project was thus initiated in 2002 to study and particularly ashmound sites, was influenced the unique Neolithic and Iron Age remains of the by patterns of visibility and movement, the pres- southern Deccan. This 2-month pilot project fo- ence of visually dramatic landscape features and cused its efforts on the Bellary District of Karnataka, the east-west movement of the sun across the sky. where prehistoric megaliths and ‘ashmounds’ It suggests that the evocative landscape of the south- (large mounds of burnt cattle dung) occupy a stun- ern Deccan was not just a backdrop for Neolithic ning landscape of naturally sculpted granitic rock activities,but rather a mythical and possibly sacred formations (FIGURE1). The aim of the project was ‘force’ that permeated many aspects of Neolithic to explore, survey and record visible archaeologi- (and subsequent Megalithicllron Age) life.
    [Show full text]
  • GRMB Annual Report 2018-19 | 59
    Government of India Ministry of Jal Shakti Department of Water Resources, River Development & Ganga Rejuvenation Godavari River Management Board GODAVARI RIVER Origin Brahmagiri near Trimbakeshwar, Nashik Dist., Maharashtra Geographical Area 9.50 % of Total Geographical Area of India Location Latitude – 16°19’ to 22°34’ North Longitude – 73°24’ to 83° 40’ East Boundaries West: Western Ghats North: Satmala hills, Ajanta range and the Mahadeo hills East: Eastern Ghats & Bay of Bengal South: Balaghat & Mahadeo ranges, stretching from eastern flank of Western Ghats & Anantgiri and other ranges of the hills. Ridges separate the Godavari basin from Krishna basin. Catchment Area 3,12,812 Sq.km. Length of the River 1465 km States Maharashtra, Madhya Pradesh, Chhattisgarh, Odisha, Karnataka, Telangana, Andhra Pradesh and Puducherry (Yanam). Length in AP & TS 772 km Major Tributaries Pravara, Manjira, Manair – Right side of River Purna, Pranhita, Indravati, Sabari – Left side of River Sub- basins Twelve (G1- G12) Select Dams/ Head works Gangapur Dam, Jayakwadi Dam, Srirama Sagar, Sripada across Main Godavari Yellampally, Kaleshwaram Projects (Medigadda, Annaram & Sundilla barrages), Dummugudem Anicut, Polavaram Dam (under construction), Dowleswaram Barrage. Hydro power stations Upper Indravati 600 MW Machkund 120 MW Balimela 510 MW Upper Sileru 240 MW Lower Sileru 460 MW Upper Kolab 320 MW Pench 160 MW Ghatghar pumped storage 250 MW Polavaram (under 960 MW construction) ANNUAL REPORT 2018-19 GODAVARI RIVER MANAGEMENT BOARD 5th Floor, Jalasoudha,
    [Show full text]
  • 2. the Geographical Setting and Pre-Historic Cultures of India
    MODULE - 1 Ancient India 2 Notes THE GEOGRAPHICAL SETTING AND PRE-HISTORIC CULTURES OF INDIA The history of any country or region cannot be understood without some knowledge of its geography. The history of the people is greatly conditioned by the geography and environment of the region in which they live. The physical geography and envi- ronmental conditions of a region include climate, soil types, water resources and other topographical features. These determine the settlement pattern, population spread, food products, human behaviour and dietary habits of a region. The Indian subcontinent is gifted with different regions with their distinct geographical features which have greatly affected the course of its history. Geographically speaking the Indian subcontinent in ancient times included the present day India, Bangladesh, Nepal, Bhutan and Pakistan. On the basis of geographical diversities the subcontinent can be broadly divided into the follow- ing main regions. These are: (i) The Himalayas (ii) The River Plains of North India (iii) The Peninsular India OBJECTIVES After studying this lesson, you will be able to: explain the physical divisions of Indian subcontinent; recognize the distinct features of each region; understand why some geographical areas are more important than the others; define the term environment; establish the relationship between geographical features and the historical devel- opments in different regions; define the terms prehistory, prehistoric cultures, and microliths; distinguish between the lower, middle and upper Palaeolithic age on the basis of the tools used; explain the Mesolithic age as a phase of transition on the basis of climate and the 10 HISTORY The Geographical Setting and pre-historic MODULE - 1 Ancient India tools used; explain the Neolithic age and its chief characteristics; differentiate between Palaeolithic and Neolithic periods and learn about the Prehistoric Art.
    [Show full text]
  • Review of Research Impact Factor : 5.2331 (Uif) Ugc Approved Journal No
    Review Of ReseaRch impact factOR : 5.2331 (Uif) UGc appROved JOURnal nO. 48514 issn: 2249-894X vOlUme - 7 | issUe - 7 | apRil - 2018 __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ RECENT PERSPECTIVE ON KARNATAKA ART HISTORY Nagappa P. Koti Asst. Professor , Dept of History , Shri Jagadamba First Grade Art’s And Science College Hittinahalli, LT.Vijayapura . ABSTRACT The southern state of Karnataka, in India, has a distinct art and culture. The diverse linguistic and religious ethnicity that are local to territory of Karnataka joined with their long chronicles have contributed massively to the differed social legacy of the state. Aside from Kannadigas, Karnataka is home to Tuluvas, Kodavas and Konkanis who likewise think about themselves as Kannadigas. Minor populaces of Tibetan Buddhists and Siddhi clans in addition to a couple of other ethnic gatherings additionally live in Karnataka. The customary society expressions cover the whole array of music, move, dramatization, narrating by vagrant troupes, and so forth. Yakshagana, an established society play, is one of the significant showy types of seaside Karnataka. Contemporary venue culture in Karnataka is a standout amongst the most energetic in India with associations like Ninasam, Ranga Shankara and Rangayana dynamic on establishments set around the Gubbi Veeranna Nataka Company. Veeragase, Kamsale and Dollu Kunitha are popular dance forms. Bharatanatya also enjoys wide patronage in Karnataka. KEY WORDS: distinct art and culture , Tibetan Buddhists and Siddhi clans. INTRODUCTION: The antiquity of Architecture of Karnataka (Kannada: ಕಾಟಕ ಾಸುಲ) can be traced to its southern Neolithic and early Iron Age, Having witnessed the architectural ideological and utilitarian transformation from shelter- ritual- religion. Here the nomenclature ‘Architecture’ is as old as c.2000 B.C.E.
    [Show full text]