Conservation Status of Primates in the Central Western Ghats, Karnataka, India

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Conservation Status of Primates in the Central Western Ghats, Karnataka, India Primate Conservation 2018 (32): 175-183 Conservation Status of Primates in the Central Western Ghats, Karnataka, India P. Ramesh Kumar1, Honnavalli N. Kumara2, M. Malathi Priya3, Hosur S. Sushma2, K. M. Meharabi4 and Swati Udayraj5 1Karnataka Forest Department, Bellary Territorial Forest Division, Bellary, Karnataka, India 2Sálim Ali Centre for Ornithology and Natural History, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India 3Karnataka Forest Department, Working Plan and Survey Division, Bellary, Karnataka, India 4Department of Animal Science, Central University of Kerala, Padannakkad, Kasaragod, Kerala, India 5Department of Ecology and Environmental Sciences, School of Life Sciences, Pondicherry University, Kalapet, Puducherry, India Abstract: Kudremukh Wildlife Division is one of the largest of the Protected Area Network (henceforth the Kudremukh Forest Complex) in the Western Ghats that includes Kudremukh National Park, Someshwara Wildlife Sanctuary and Mookambika Wild- life Sanctuary, covering an area of about 1,285 km². The Kudremukh Forest Complex support three species of diurnal non-human primates: the lion-tailed macaque (Macaca silenus), bonnet macaque (Macaca radiata), and the black-footed gray langur (Sem- nopithecus hypoleucos), hereafter called the Hanuman langur. A survey of diurnal primates was carried out between December 2014 and April 2015 in the Kudremukh Forest Complex. A grid of 5-km² cells was superimposed on a map of the three protected areas of the Kudremukh Forest Complex. Each grid cell was systematically surveyed for four consecutive days using an existing network of trails and animal paths. The encounter rate of the Hanuman langur was significantly higher than the bonnet macaque and lion-tailed macaque. The encounter rates of the Hanuman langur, bonnet macaque, and lion-tailed macaque were 0.20 ±0.27 SD, 0.11 ±0.16 SD, and 0.03 ±0.10 SD, respectively. Mean group size of the bonnet macaques was 18.3 ±5.9 SD individuals per group, the adult female to male ratio was 1:2.3, and the adult female to immature ratio was 1:2.4. Mean group size of the Hanuman langurs was 6.7 ±3.10 SD, the adult male to adult female ratio was 1:1.9, and the adult female to immature ratio was 1:1.6. Mean group size of the lion-tailed macaques was 15.9 ±7.3 SD. The adult male to adult female ratio was 1:2.8, the adult female–immature ratio was 1:1.8, and the adult female to infant ratio was 1:0.3. The results of the current population assessment show a viable and large population of the lion-tailed macaque with a minimum population size of 585 individuals in 39 groups, making this one of the largest populations of the lion-tailed macaque in the entire Western Ghats. Key words: Lion-tailed macaque, bonnet macaque, Hanuman langur, population status, central Western Ghats Introduction and a good number of protected areas (Gubbi et al. 2016). Although narrow, the rainforests in Karnataka are contiguous The Western Ghats of continental India and the island over long stretches, and so may be crucial for the survival of of Sri Lanka have been classed together as one of 25 global the region’s many endemic species, including primates. The Biodiversity Hotspots (Myers et al. 2000), keeping in mind, Western Ghats are home to five of the 17 primates in India, however, that flora and fauna of the two regions differ sub- similar to the Northeastern Himalaya regarding primate diver- stantially (Dittus 2013). The Western Ghats are spread over sity and endemism. Due to the presence of continuous canopy an area of 1,64,280 km² from 8°0'N to 22°26'N and from and the availability of diverse fruit-bearing trees round the 72°55'E to 78°11'E and extend over a distance of 1,600 km year, the rain forests of the Western Ghats are extremely rich from Tapti River in the north to Kanyakumari in the south, in arboreal faunal diversity, especially non-human primates. traversing six states: Gujarat, Maharashtra, Goa, Karnataka, The five species of diurnal non-human primates are the lion- Kerala and Tamil Nadu. The Western Ghats range is divided tailed macaque (Macaca silenus), bonnet macaque (M. radi- into three sections—the Northern, Southern, and Central ata), Nilgiri langur (Semnopithecus johnii) and two species Western Ghats. Karnataka holds the major portion of the Cen- of Hanuman langur, Semnopithecus hypoleucos and S. priam tral Western Ghats, with large tracts of relatively intact forest (see Ashalakshmi et al. 2014). Although the bonnet macaque 175 Ramesh Kumar et al. and Hanuman langur are widespread throughout southern of primates in the three protected areas of the Kudremukh India, the lion-tailed macaque and Nilgiri langur are endemic Wildlife Division, the Kudremukh Forest Complex. to the Western Ghats. The distribution of the lion-tailed macaque once extended from the southern tip of the West- Methods ern Ghats to some parts of the states of Goa and Maharashtra (Green and Minkowaski 1977). Lion-tailed macaques were Study site eliminated from Maharashtra and Goa because of the destruc- The Kudremukh Forest Complex situated in the middle tion and degradation of their habitat over the centuries with of the central Western Ghats was reorganized and made a the fragmentation of the rainforests and consequent isolation separate Wildlife Division in 1992, with jurisdiction over of the macaque groups (Umapathy 1998; Kumara et al. 2011). three protected areas: Kudremukh National Park, Somesh- The species’ range is today restricted to Karnataka, Kerala wara Wildlife Sanctuary, and Mookambika Wildlife Sanc- and Tamil Nadu (Kumara and Sinha 2009), and the majority tuary (Fig. 1). Initially, the three protected areas were not is now in numerous small isolated populations. Owing to its contiguous but separated by reserved forests. The original restricted distribution, low global population, and the existing areas of the Kudremukh National Park, Someshwara Wildlife threats (habitat or population fragmentation, habitat degrada- Sanctuary, and Mookambika Wildlife Sanctuary were 600.32 tion, hunting and vulnerability to random events), the lion- km², 88.40 km², and 246.99 km², respectively. However, in tailed macaque has been listed as “Endangered” on the IUCN 2011, as a part of wildlife conservation strategy, the boundar- Red List, and in “Schedule I” in India’s Wildlife Protection ies of the Someshwara Wildlife Sanctuary and the Mookam- Act 1972. bika Wildlife Sanctuary were rationalized by the inclusion of Large populations of lion-tailed macaque are expected to the reserved forests between the protected areas. Accordingly, occur in very few regions over the entire Western Ghats, and about 225.85 km² areas of reserved forests were added to the the conservation status of the species is likely to differ across Someshwara Wildlife Sanctuary to connect it to the Kudre- these sparse populations (Kumara and Sinha 2009). Along mukh National Park located on its southern side. About the Western Ghats, the Kalakad-Mundanthurai Tiger Reserve 123.37 km² of reserved forest were added to the Mookambika harbors approximately 31 groups with about 460 animals Wildlife Sanctuary, connecting it to the Someshwara Wildlife (Sushma et al. 2014), and there are 32 groups in Sirsi-Hon- navara in Uttara Kannada district, Karnataka (Kumara and Singh 2004a), and 14 groups with an estimated 260 animals overall in Silent Valley National Park (Joseph and Ramach- andran 1998). The lion-tailed macaque habitat in Anamalai Hills is highly fragmented and surrounded by plantations, including tea estates, yet holds about 62 groups (Kumara et al. 2014). A drastic decline of the lion-tailed macaque popula- tion was reported from the Brahmagiri Wildlife Sanctuary, the Talacauvery Wildlife Sanctuary, the Pushpagiri Wildlife Sanc- tuary, and the Sharavathi Valley Wildlife Sanctuary, all due to extensive hunting (Kumara and Singh 2004a, 2004b; Kumara and Sinha 2009). Karanth (1985) provided the first baseline data on the lion-tailed macaque’s status and distribution for the entire state of Karnataka using secondary information that included three protected areas of the Kudremukh Wild- life Division, Karkala. Kumara and Singh (2008) assessed the population status of the lion-tailed macaque for all the then three protected areas of the Kudremukh Wildlife Divi- sion (an area of about 935 km²) and revealed a minor decline in population numbers. The study did not include, however, the adjoining suitable habitats (reserved forests), which have recently been included in the protected area network there. Lacking population data for the entire landscape, the status of the lion-tailed macaque in the Kudremukh landscape or Kudremukh forest complex (Kudremukh National Park, Someshwara Wildlife Sanctuary, and Mookambika Wildlife Sanctuary) was not clear, and the body of literature revealed the need for population assessment in unexplored habitats of Figure 1. Three protected areas (Mookambika Wildlife Sanctuary, Someshwara the species. Here, we report on a survey to establish the status Wildlife Sanctuary, and Kudremukh National Park) of the Kudremukh Forest Complex in the Western Ghats, Karnataka. 176 Primates in the central Western Ghats Sanctuary (Table 1). Kudremukh National Park (600.57 km²), Someshwara Wildlife Sanctuary (314.25 km²) and Mookam- bika Wildlife Sanctuary (370.36 km²) are now connected, with a total area of about 1,285 km² and form the single larg- est contiguous protected area network in Karnataka (Fig. 2). Major habitat types in the Kudremukh forest complex include wet evergreen forests, semi-evergreen forests, moist deciduous forests, high elevation grasslands and planta- tions (Fig. 3). The evergreen and semi-evergreen forests are mostly restricted to the valleys and steep slopes, whereas the Figure 2. Forest ranges in three protected areas (Mookambika Wildlife Figure 4. Encounter rate of primates in the Kudremukh Forest Complex Sanctuary, Someshwara Wildlife Sanctuary, and Kudremukh National Park) (LTM: Lion-tailed Macaque, BM: Bonnet Macaque, HL: Hanuman Langur).
Recommended publications
  • Hampi, Badami & Around
    SCRIPT YOUR ADVENTURE in KARNATAKA WILDLIFE • WATERSPORTS • TREKS • ACTIVITIES This guide is researched and written by Supriya Sehgal 2 PLAN YOUR TRIP CONTENTS 3 Contents PLAN YOUR TRIP .................................................................. 4 Adventures in Karnataka ...........................................................6 Need to Know ........................................................................... 10 10 Top Experiences ...................................................................14 7 Days of Action .......................................................................20 BEST TRIPS ......................................................................... 22 Bengaluru, Ramanagara & Nandi Hills ...................................24 Detour: Bheemeshwari & Galibore Nature Camps ...............44 Chikkamagaluru .......................................................................46 Detour: River Tern Lodge .........................................................53 Kodagu (Coorg) .......................................................................54 Hampi, Badami & Around........................................................68 Coastal Karnataka .................................................................. 78 Detour: Agumbe .......................................................................86 Dandeli & Jog Falls ...................................................................90 Detour: Castle Rock .................................................................94 Bandipur & Nagarhole ...........................................................100
    [Show full text]
  • PROTECTED AREA UPDATE News and Information from Protected Areas in India and South Asia
    T PROTECTED AREA UPDATE News and Information from protected areas in India and South Asia Vol. XXI, No. 3 June 2015 (No. 115) LIST OF CONTENTS Maharashtra 9 337 villages from nine talukas in Pune district grant EDITORIAL 3 no-objection to ESZ Tiger conservation and the construction of an Efforts to introduce solar irrigation pumps in Pench ‘urban conservation public’ TR buffer NTCA nod for release of a captive tigress in Pench NEWS FROM INDIAN STATES Tiger Reserve Assam 4 Illegal research carried out on animals at VJBU and 11 poachers killed, 20 arrested in Kaziranga National SGNP in 2001 Park this year Odisha 11 NGT asks Assam government to submit status report 70 lakh Olive ridley hatchlings in Odisha on restraining construction inside Manas NP CFR titles under the FRA distributed to villages in WWF-India and Apeejay Tea partner to reduce the Similipal TR human-elephant conflict in Assam Odisha Mining Corp to get Karlapat bauxite mines, Gujarat 5 part of which are inside the Karlapat WLS FD proposes drone surveillance for Gujarat forests Punjab 12 Jharkhand 6 Punjab to release gharials in Sutlej and Beas rivers Jharkhand working on a comprehensive 24/7 Rajasthan 13 elephant track-and-alert mechanism Tigers from Ranthambore TR moving into MP Karnataka 6 Five tigresses had 22 miscarriages in Sariska TR in NTCA approves tiger reserve status to Kudremukh; seven years state government disagrees Tamil Nadu 13 Dharwad-Belgavi railway line section turns death Plastic waste in elephant dung in Mudumalai, trap for wildlife Sathyamangalam and
    [Show full text]
  • Nonhuman Primates
    Zoological Studies 42(1): 93-105 (2003) Dental Variation among Asian Colobines (Nonhuman Primates): Phylogenetic Similarities or Functional Correspondence? Ruliang Pan1,2,* and Charles Oxnard1 1School of Anatomy and Human Biology, University of Western Australia, Crawley, Perth, WA 6009, Australia 2Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100080, China (Accepted August 27, 2002) Ruliang Pan and Charles Oxnard (2003) Dental variation among Asian colobines (nonhuman primates): phy- logenetic similarities or functional correspondence? Zoological Studies 42(1): 93-105. In order to reveal varia- tions among Asian colobines and to test whether the resemblance in dental structure among them is mainly associated with similarities in phylogeny or functional adaptation, teeth of 184 specimens from 15 Asian colobine species were measured and studied by performing bivariate (allometry) and multivariate (principal components) analyses. Results indicate that each tooth shows a significant close relationship with body size. Low negative and positive allometric scales for incisors and molars (M2s and M3s), respectively, are each con- sidered to be related to special dental modifications for folivorous preference of colobines. Sexual dimorphism in canine eruption reported by Harvati (2000) is further considered to be associated with differences in growth trajectories (allometric pattern) between the 2 sexes. The relationships among the 6 genera of Asian colobines found greatly differ from those proposed in other studies. Four groups were detected: 1) Rhinopithecus, 2) Semnopithecus, 3) Trachypithecus, and 4) Nasalis, Pygathrix, and Presbytis. These separations were mainly determined by differences in molar structure. Molar sizes of the former 2 groups are larger than those of the latter 2 groups.
    [Show full text]
  • Of 426 AUTO YEAR IVPR SRL PAGE DOB NAME ADDRESS STATE PIN
    Page 1 of 426 AUTO YEAR IVPR_SRL PAGE DOB NAME ADDRESS STATE PIN REG_NUM QUALIF MOBILE EMAIL 7356 1994S 2091 345 28.04.49 KRISHNAMSETY D-12, IVRI, QTRS, HEBBAL, KARNATAKA VCI/85/94 B.V.Sc./APAU/ PRABHODAS BANGALORE-580024 KARNATAKA 8992 1994S 3750 425 03.01.43 SATYA NARAYAN SAHA IVRI PO HA FARM BANGALORE- KARNATAKA VCI/92/94 B.V.Sc. & 24 KARNATAKA A.H./CU/66 6466 1994S 1188 295 DINTARAN PAL ANIMAL NUTRITION DIV NIANP KARNATAKA 560030 WB/2150/91 BVSc & 9480613205 [email protected] ADUGODI HOSUR ROAD AH/BCKVV/91 BANGALORE 560030 KARNATAKA 7200 1994S 1931 337 KAJAL SANKAR ROY SCIENTIST (SS) NIANP KARNATAKA 560030 WB/2254/93 BVSc&AH/BCKVV/93 9448974024 [email protected] ADNGODI BANGLORE 560030 m KARNATAKA 12229 1995 2593 488 26.08.39 KRISHNAMURTHY.R,S/ #1645, 19TH CROSS 7TH KARNATAKA APSVC/205/94,VCI/61 BVSC/UNI OF 080 25721645 krishnamurthy.rayakot O VEERASWAMY SECTOR, 3RD MAIN HSR 7/95 MADRAS/62 09480258795 [email protected] NAIDU LAYOUT, BANGALORE-560 102. 14837 1995 5242 626 SADASHIV M. MUDLAJE FARMS BALNAD KARNATAKA KAESVC/805/ BVSC/UAS VILLAGE UJRRHADE PUTTUR BANGALORE/69 DA KA KARANATAKA 11694 1995 2049 460 29/04/69 JAMBAGI ADIGANGA EXTENSION AREA KARNATAKA 591220 KARNATAKA/2417/ BVSC&AH 9448187670 shekharjambagi@gmai RAJASHEKHAR A/P. HARUGERI BELGAUM l.com BALAKRISHNA 591220 KARANATAKA 10289 1995 624 386 BASAVARAJA REDDY HUKKERI, BELGAUM DISTT. KARNATAKA KARSUL/437/ B.V.SC./GAS 9241059098 A.I. KARANATAKA BANGALORE/73 14212 1995 4605 592 25/07/68 RAJASHEKAR D PATIL, AMALZARI PO, BILIGI TQ, KARNATAKA KARSV/2824/ B.V.SC/UAS S/O DONKANAGOUDA BIJAPUR DT.
    [Show full text]
  • Western Ghats & Sri Lanka Biodiversity Hotspot
    Ecosystem Profile WESTERN GHATS & SRI LANKA BIODIVERSITY HOTSPOT WESTERN GHATS REGION FINAL VERSION MAY 2007 Prepared by: Kamal S. Bawa, Arundhati Das and Jagdish Krishnaswamy (Ashoka Trust for Research in Ecology & the Environment - ATREE) K. Ullas Karanth, N. Samba Kumar and Madhu Rao (Wildlife Conservation Society) in collaboration with: Praveen Bhargav, Wildlife First K.N. Ganeshaiah, University of Agricultural Sciences Srinivas V., Foundation for Ecological Research, Advocacy and Learning incorporating contributions from: Narayani Barve, ATREE Sham Davande, ATREE Balanchandra Hegde, Sahyadri Wildlife and Forest Conservation Trust N.M. Ishwar, Wildlife Institute of India Zafar-ul Islam, Indian Bird Conservation Network Niren Jain, Kudremukh Wildlife Foundation Jayant Kulkarni, Envirosearch S. Lele, Centre for Interdisciplinary Studies in Environment & Development M.D. Madhusudan, Nature Conservation Foundation Nandita Mahadev, University of Agricultural Sciences Kiran M.C., ATREE Prachi Mehta, Envirosearch Divya Mudappa, Nature Conservation Foundation Seema Purshothaman, ATREE Roopali Raghavan, ATREE T. R. Shankar Raman, Nature Conservation Foundation Sharmishta Sarkar, ATREE Mohammed Irfan Ullah, ATREE and with the technical support of: Conservation International-Center for Applied Biodiversity Science Assisted by the following experts and contributors: Rauf Ali Gladwin Joseph Uma Shaanker Rene Borges R. Kannan B. Siddharthan Jake Brunner Ajith Kumar C.S. Silori ii Milind Bunyan M.S.R. Murthy Mewa Singh Ravi Chellam Venkat Narayana H. Sudarshan B.A. Daniel T.S. Nayar R. Sukumar Ranjit Daniels Rohan Pethiyagoda R. Vasudeva Soubadra Devy Narendra Prasad K. Vasudevan P. Dharma Rajan M.K. Prasad Muthu Velautham P.S. Easa Asad Rahmani Arun Venkatraman Madhav Gadgil S.N. Rai Siddharth Yadav T. Ganesh Pratim Roy Santosh George P.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Detailed Species Accounts from The
    Threatened Birds of Asia: The BirdLife International Red Data Book Editors N. J. COLLAR (Editor-in-chief), A. V. ANDREEV, S. CHAN, M. J. CROSBY, S. SUBRAMANYA and J. A. TOBIAS Maps by RUDYANTO and M. J. CROSBY Principal compilers and data contributors ■ BANGLADESH P. Thompson ■ BHUTAN R. Pradhan; C. Inskipp, T. Inskipp ■ CAMBODIA Sun Hean; C. M. Poole ■ CHINA ■ MAINLAND CHINA Zheng Guangmei; Ding Changqing, Gao Wei, Gao Yuren, Li Fulai, Liu Naifa, Ma Zhijun, the late Tan Yaokuang, Wang Qishan, Xu Weishu, Yang Lan, Yu Zhiwei, Zhang Zhengwang. ■ HONG KONG Hong Kong Bird Watching Society (BirdLife Affiliate); H. F. Cheung; F. N. Y. Lock, C. K. W. Ma, Y. T. Yu. ■ TAIWAN Wild Bird Federation of Taiwan (BirdLife Partner); L. Liu Severinghaus; Chang Chin-lung, Chiang Ming-liang, Fang Woei-horng, Ho Yi-hsian, Hwang Kwang-yin, Lin Wei-yuan, Lin Wen-horn, Lo Hung-ren, Sha Chian-chung, Yau Cheng-teh. ■ INDIA Bombay Natural History Society (BirdLife Partner Designate) and Sálim Ali Centre for Ornithology and Natural History; L. Vijayan and V. S. Vijayan; S. Balachandran, R. Bhargava, P. C. Bhattacharjee, S. Bhupathy, A. Chaudhury, P. Gole, S. A. Hussain, R. Kaul, U. Lachungpa, R. Naroji, S. Pandey, A. Pittie, V. Prakash, A. Rahmani, P. Saikia, R. Sankaran, P. Singh, R. Sugathan, Zafar-ul Islam ■ INDONESIA BirdLife International Indonesia Country Programme; Ria Saryanthi; D. Agista, S. van Balen, Y. Cahyadin, R. F. A. Grimmett, F. R. Lambert, M. Poulsen, Rudyanto, I. Setiawan, C. Trainor ■ JAPAN Wild Bird Society of Japan (BirdLife Partner); Y. Fujimaki; Y. Kanai, H.
    [Show full text]
  • District Disaster Management Plan- Udupi
    DISTRICT DISASTER MANAGEMENT PLAN- UDUPI UDUPI DISTRICT 2015-16 -1- -2- Executive Summary The District Disaster Management Plan is a key part of an emergency management. It will play a significant role to address the unexpected disasters that occur in the district effectively. The information available in DDMP is valuable in terms of its use during disaster. Based on the history of various disasters that occur in the district, the plan has been so designed as an action plan rather than a resource book. Utmost attention has been paid to make it handy, precise rather than bulky one. This plan has been prepared which is based on the guidelines from the National Institute of Disaster Management (NIDM). While preparing this plan, most of the issues, relevant to crisis management, have been carefully dealt with. During the time of disaster there will be a delay before outside help arrives. At first, self-help is essential and depends on a prepared community which is alert and informed. Efforts have been made to collect and develop this plan to make it more applicable and effective to handle any type of disaster. The DDMP developed touch upon some significant issues like Incident Command System (ICS), In fact, the response mechanism, an important part of the plan is designed with the ICS. It is obvious that the ICS, a good model of crisis management has been included in the response part for the first time. It has been the most significant tool for the response manager to deal with the crisis within the limited period and to make optimum use of the available resources.
    [Show full text]
  • A Study on Ancient Artifacts Around Badami Hill and Their Correlation with the Natural Rock Arch Of
    A Study on Ancient Artifacts Around Badami Hill and Their Correlation with the Natural Rock Arch of Sidlaphadi SHORT REPORT PRADIPTA BANERJEE MAYUR BAJAJ *Author affiliations can be found in the back matter of this article ABSTRACT CORRESPONDING AUTHOR: Pradipta Banerjee The Badami hill of Bagalkot district, Karnataka, India, houses a large rock arch termed Dayananda Sagar University, IN “Sidlaphadi” that was used as a shelter by primitive man. The hill was searched to [email protected] find any prehistoric artifact that would act as a directional marker towards the arch. An interesting structure was noted in one of the natural caves near the southwestern part of the hill at 15°55’06”N latitude and 75°41’02”E longitude. A miniature replica TO CITE THIS ARTICLE: of the arch was carved onto the floor of the cave. The axis of the miniature bridge Banerjee, P and Bajaj, M. 2021. made an angle of 28.5 ± 1.5° with the 75°41’02”E longitude. The axis, upon extension A Study on Ancient Artifacts eastwards at the defining angle reaches the northern slope of Sidlaphadi. The authors Around Badami Hill and Their also located a megalithic stone arrangement in the northern part of the hill that had Correlation with the Natural a pointed capstone and was thought to be oriented towards the rock arch. The stone Rock Arch of Sidlaphadi. Ancient Asia, 12: 9, pp. 1–9. arrangement was in the same latitude as that of the Sidlaphadi site, but the capstone DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/ ° ° was oriented 22 E towards the winter solstice sunrise at 112.5 azimuth.
    [Show full text]
  • MAHARASHTRA Not Mention PN-34
    SL Name of Company/Person Address Telephone No City/Tow Ratnagiri 1 SHRI MOHAMMED AYUB KADWAI SANGAMESHWAR SANGAM A MULLA SHWAR 2 SHRI PRAFULLA H 2232, NR SAI MANDIR RATNAGI NACHANKAR PARTAVANE RATNAGIRI RI 3 SHRI ALI ISMAIL SOLKAR 124, ISMAIL MANZIL KARLA BARAGHAR KARLA RATNAGI 4 SHRI DILIP S JADHAV VERVALI BDK LANJA LANJA 5 SHRI RAVINDRA S MALGUND RATNAGIRI MALGUN CHITALE D 6 SHRI SAMEER S NARKAR SATVALI LANJA LANJA 7 SHRI. S V DESHMUKH BAZARPETH LANJA LANJA 8 SHRI RAJESH T NAIK HATKHAMBA RATNAGIRI HATKHA MBA 9 SHRI MANESH N KONDAYE RAJAPUR RAJAPUR 10 SHRI BHARAT S JADHAV DHAULAVALI RAJAPUR RAJAPUR 11 SHRI RAJESH M ADAKE PHANSOP RATNAGIRI RATNAGI 12 SAU FARIDA R KAZI 2050, RAJAPURKAR COLONY RATNAGI UDYAMNAGAR RATNAGIRI RI 13 SHRI S D PENDASE & SHRI DHAMANI SANGAM M M SANGAM SANGAMESHWAR EHSWAR 14 SHRI ABDULLA Y 418, RAJIWADA RATNAGIRI RATNAGI TANDEL RI 15 SHRI PRAKASH D SANGAMESHWAR SANGAM KOLWANKAR RATNAGIRI EHSWAR 16 SHRI SAGAR A PATIL DEVALE RATNAGIRI SANGAM ESHWAR 17 SHRI VIKAS V NARKAR AGARWADI LANJA LANJA 18 SHRI KISHOR S PAWAR NANAR RAJAPUR RAJAPUR 19 SHRI ANANT T MAVALANGE PAWAS PAWAS 20 SHRI DILWAR P GODAD 4110, PATHANWADI KILLA RATNAGI RATNAGIRI RI 21 SHRI JAYENDRA M DEVRUKH RATNAGIRI DEVRUK MANGALE H 22 SHRI MANSOOR A KAZI HALIMA MANZIL RAJAPUR MADILWADA RAJAPUR RATNAGI 23 SHRI SIKANDAR Y BEG KONDIVARE SANGAM SANGAMESHWAR ESHWAR 24 SHRI NIZAM MOHD KARLA RATNAGIRI RATNAGI 25 SMT KOMAL K CHAVAN BHAMBED LANJA LANJA 26 SHRI AKBAR K KALAMBASTE KASBA SANGAM DASURKAR ESHWAR 27 SHRI ILYAS MOHD FAKIR GUMBAD SAITVADA RATNAGI 28 SHRI
    [Show full text]
  • Report from the 3Rd Meeting of Saving Asia's Vultures from Extinction
    Report from the 3rd meeting of Saving Asia’s Vultures from Extinction Alipurduar & Buxa Tiger Reserve, West Bengal, India 7-9 November 2013 1 Report compiled and edited by Chris Bowden, SAVE Programme Manager December 2013 2 Contents 1. Updated SAVE priorities for vulture conservation..... 4 2. Meeting Programme.................................................... 5 3. Meeting Attendees....................................................... 8 4. Overview of 2013 reported updates............................. 9 5. Updated SAVE membership & website...................... 10 6. Action points agreed by the meeting .......................... 13 7. List of Acronyms and abbreviations ........................... 17 8. Full list of 2013 update reports to SAVE (in Appendix)........ 18 Appendix: Country updates and progress reports to SAVE...... 20-101 Photo credits – Sachin Ranade, Soumya Chakraborty (BNHS), Chris Bowden (RSPB), Mandy West. 3 1. Updated SAVE priorities for vulture conservation in 2014: An immediate ban of diclofenac manufactured for human medicine in vials or ampoules larger than 3ml An effective system of regulation of veterinary drugs, based upon safety-testing on vultures (protocol already agreed for India) initiated and underway for painkillers (NSAIDs) already in and entering veterinary practice Veterinary licenses to be withdrawn for two drugs – ketoprofen and aceclofenac - based on the good existing evidence that they are unsafe for vultures Major efforts urgently needed within South Asia to address the immediate and increasing gap in funding for vulture conservation which now jeopardises the programme Promotion and expansion of network and approach of ‘Vulture Safe Zones’ across South Asia Maintain and support the existing vulture conservation breeding programmes throughout South Asia Prepare for first soft releases of captive bred vultures into Vulture Safe Zones by 2016 Link SAVE activities and meetings to closely support the ‘Regional Steering Committee’ in order to facilitate the urgent implementation of the 2012 Delhi Regional Agreement 4 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Mitochondrial and Nuclear Markers Suggest Hanuman Langur (Primates: Colobinae) Polyphyly: Implications for Their Species Status
    Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 54 (2010) 627–633 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/ympev Short Communication Mitochondrial and nuclear markers suggest Hanuman langur (Primates: Colobinae) polyphyly: Implications for their species status K. Praveen Karanth a,c,*, Lalji Singh b, Caro-Beth Stewart c a Centre for Ecological Sciences, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore 560012, India b Center for Cellular and Molecular Biology, Uppal Road, Hyderabad 500007, India c Department of Biological Sciences, University at Albany, State University of New York, Albany, NY 12222, USA article info abstract Article history: Recent molecular studies on langurs of the Indian subcontinent suggest that the widely-distributed and Received 30 June 2008 morphologically variable Hanuman langurs (Semnopithecus entellus) are polyphyletic with respect to Revised 9 October 2009 Nilgiri and purple-faced langurs. To further investigate this scenario, we have analyzed additional Accepted 29 October 2009 sequences of mitochondrial cytochrome b as well as nuclear protamine P1 genes from these species. Available online 6 November 2009 The results confirm Hanuman langur polyphyly in the mitochondrial tree and the nuclear markers sug- gest that the Hanuman langurs share protamine P1 alleles with Nilgiri and purple-faced langurs. We rec- Keywords: ommend provisional splitting of the so-called Hanuman langurs into three species such that the Semnopithecus taxonomy is consistent with
    [Show full text]
  • Graduate Student Summer Fieldwork Award Report, October 2019
    Institute for Regional and International Studies (IRIS) Graduate Student Summer Fieldwork Award Report, October 2019 Quantifying forest loss in the Nethravathi watershed, India Deepika Guruprasad, Environmental Observation and Informatics Master’s Program Nelson Institute, UW Madison. The Western Ghats is a mountain range which runs parallel to the western coast of India. It is a global biodiversity hotspot which is home to several endangered and endemic mammals, birds and plant species. Many life-sustaining rivers originate here and provide several irreplaceable ecosystem services. The Nethravathi river is one of the major west flowing rivers whose tributaries originate in these mountains. Its watershed has some of the last untouched tropical forests which are key to maintaining connectivity between two protected areas, Kudremukh National Park in the North and Pushpagiri Wildlife sanctuary in the South. In the last 20 years, this region has seen a rapid loss of forests due to ill-planned linear infrastructure projects such as pipelines, roads, hydroelectric, and river diversion dams. These projects have and continue to fragment the landscape as new projects are proposed and implemented with little or no impact assessment. Land use change alters a homogenous landscape into heterogeneous patches, which leads to habitat fragmentation. My summer leadership placement was with the wildlife advocacy non-profit, Wildlife First. The objective of this placement was to map and quantify forest loss due to linear infrastructure projects in the Nethravathi river watershed. Filling in data gaps using reliable land use maps and forest loss statistics is key to make evidence-based policy recommendations. The first part of my project was to map land use of the region using satellite imagery.
    [Show full text]