DOCSLIB.ORG

Stop Heritage Crime: Coins, Archaeological and Ethnographic Material” (Lillestrøm, January 2011); “Illicit Objects: Between Legal Framework and Practical Handling

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Stop Heritage Crime: Coins, Archaeological and Ethnographic Material” (Lillestrøm, January 2011); “Illicit Objects: Between Legal Framework and Practical Handling StopStop hheritageeritage ccrimerime Good practices and recommendations The project „Legal and illicit trade with cultural heritage. Research and education platform of experience exchange in the fi eld of prevention from crime against cultural heritage” Warszawa 2011 StopStop hheritageeritage ccrimerime Good practices and recommendations The project „Legal and illicit trade with cultural heritage. Research and education platform of experience exchange in the fi eld of prevention from crime against cultural heritage” Warszawa 2011 Partners Supported by a grant from Iceland, Liechtenstein and Norway through the EEA Financial Mechanism and the Norwegian Financial Mechanism Publisher: ul. Szwoleżerów 9, 00-464 Warszawa 22 628 48 41, e-mail: [email protected] Project coordinator: Aleksandra Chabiera Technical coordinator: Michał Aniszewski Scientific editing: Liv Ramskjaer, Anne Nyhamar, Aleksandra Chabiera, Michał Aniszewski Proofreading: English Prep Graphic design: Direktpoint - Tomasz Świtała, Wojciech Rojek Printing and binding: Wydawnictwo Polskiego Związku Niewidomych Sp. z o.o Print run: 1000 egz. Illustrations: The National Heritage Board of Poland Archive, sxc.hu, shutterstock © Copyright by the National Heritage Board of Poland, Warsaw 2011 ISBN 978-83-931656-5-0 Table of content X Introductionuction 6 Overview 9 Sidsel Bleken – Legal and illicit trade in cultural heritage 11 11 Marianne Lehtimäki – Looting and illicit trade in cultural heritage – problems that cannot be solved by one state or one sector alone 13 13 Aleksandra Chabiera – Legal and illicit trade with cultural heritage. Research and education platform of experience exchange in the field of prevention from crime against cultural heritage – about the project 15 15 Dariusz Bogacz – National Heritage Board of Poland 17 17 Liv Ramskjaer – Arts Council Norway (Norsk Kulturråd) 19 19 Anne Nyhamar – Riksantikvaren - The Directorate for Cultural Heritage 21 21 Robert Domżał – The Polish Maritime Museum in Gdańsk 23 Problems, recommendations, good practices 23 Liv Ramskjær – Norwegian Legislation on Cultural Heritage 27 29 Prof. dr hab. Wojciech Kowalski – New rules on exporting historical objects abroad according to the Polish law 31 33 Liv Ramskjær – The 1970 UNESCO Convention on the Means of Prohibiting and Preventing the Illicit Import, Export and Transfer of Ownership of Cultural Property. History, connected conventions and Norwegian ratification and practice 35 37 Olgierd Jakubowski – Illegal export of cultural heritage after the opening of borders in the Schengen Area 39 41 Jan Romsaas – Applications for export of cultural heritage objects – practice at the Norwegian Folk Museum 43 45 Håkon Ingvaldsen – Archaeological Artefacts and Illegal Trade: A Norwegian Museum Perspective 47 51 Rafał Koliński – War, crisis and illicit trade: the Iraqi lesson 53 55 Leif Pareli – Museums, Cultural Property and Illicit Trade in Times of War and Conflict 57 59 Marianne Gjertsen – Art and antique dealers. Ethics and trade in cultural property 61 63 Sidsel Helliesen – Cases of theft from the National Gallery’s exhibition halls in 1982, 1993 and 1994 65 67 Iwona Pomian – Protection of underwater cultural heritage in the Polish zone of the Baltic Sea 69 73 Wojciech Krupiński – The Illegal Export of Historical Objects According to the National Border Guard’s Assessment 75 77 Marcin Goch, Mirosław Karpowicz – Wybrane aspekty poszukiwań skradzionych zabytków z perspektywy polskiej policji 79 81 Anna Skaldawska – Selected Aspects of the Search for Stolen Historical Monuments from the Perspective of the Polish Police 83 83 Elżbieta Rogowska, Karina Chabowska – Catalogue of Wartime Losses Documented by the Ministry of Culture and National Heritage 87 87 Bjørgulf Andersen – Crime against Heritage in Europe – the Role and Tasks of the Customs Service 89 89 Bartosz Skaldawski – Cooperation between services combating crimes against cultural heritage and institutions specialising in monument protection 91 95 Piotr Ogrodzki – Protection project against crime and fire for historical wooden churches 99 99 Paulina Florjanowicz – Implementing the Educational Strategy of the National Heritage Board of Poland within the Scope of Combating Crime against Archaeological Heritage 103 103 Marcin Sabaciński – Cooperation between the national heritage board of poland and the Allegro auction website in the campaign against the illegal trade of archaeological artifacts 107 107 Brian Kristian Wennberg – Combating cultural heritage crime within the Norwegian police: education and higher competence 111 111 Josephine M. Rasmussen, prof. Christopher Prescott – Implementation, complications and lack of education: Some reflections on the advantages of knowledge exchange 117 115 Rolf Forsdahl – How can the tourism industry contribute to the protection of cultural heritage? 121 121 Tone Simensen Karlgård, Marieanne Davy Ball – Typical souvenirs, originals or copies, how do we know? 127 125 Marcin Sabaciński – Crimes against archaeological heritage in the context of how archaeology is perceived by society 131 129 Małgorzata Hudyma – Building awareness of the need for cultural heritage protection 135 133 Axel Mykleby – Methods of public communication 139 137 Aleksandra Chabiera – Promotion and education. Some cases of practices around the world 143 143 Riikka Alvik i Maija Matikka – The Wreck of the Vrouw Maria – problems and good practice in the protection of underwater sites 149 147 Conclusions 153 Introduction The idea of a joint Polish-Norwegian project on legal The primary aim of the project was to create and illicit trade with cultural heritage was first brought a forum of exchange of experience between Polish up during an expert meeting of the Monitoring Group and Norwegian professionals involved in the fight on Cultural Heritage in the Baltic Sea States in early against the illicit trade of cultural objects. The 2008. By then, the question of crime against heritage experts who took part, represented a wide range had become an important issue to all countries of stakeholders: heritage professionals, museum involved in the Baltic network. Through the Cultural workers, field archaeologists, NGO members, Exchange Fund, the national heritage agencies of journalists, tour operators as well as representatives Poland and Norway – the National Heritage Board of the Police, Customs, the Border Guard and the of Poland (Narodowy Instytut Dziedzictwa, formerly Army. During three consecutive workshops – two Krajowy Ośrodek Badań i Dokumentacji Zabytków) in Oslo and one in Gdansk and the final conference and Arts Council Norway (Norsk Kulturråd, formerly in Warsaw - we shared knowledge and experience ABM-utvikling) along with the Norwegian Directorate on how to face this challenge and how to implement for Cultural Heritage (Riksantikvaren) and with existing national laws and international conventions. ththee susupportpport of tthehe MMaritimearitim Museum in Gdansk (C(Centralneentralne Muzeum Morskie) - decided to investigate ththisis totopicpic further. The intention was to analanalyzeyze the ssituationituation aandnd ddeviseevise rrecommendationsecommendations which could be distributed throuthroughoutghout the whole Baltic SSeaea ReRegion.gion. 6 Although we face very different challenges on In this publication we present the results of our work. a national level, we recognise that illicit trade of We have tackled the issue of the illicit trade of cultural cultural goods is a type of crime which transcends heritage from different angles and with examples from national boundaries. We also recognise that it is Poland and Norway. We hope this publication will a type of crime which can only be counteracted prove a useful of reference tool for the many issues through international collaboration – the exchange raised during the project. of knowledge, the exchange of experience and To conclude, as the project team, we would like to a common set of rules. The wide and inclusive thank all those who contributed to this work with approach of the project resulted in the extension their knowledge and experience. We would also like of cooperation between involved institutions, and to thank the governments of Norway and Poland showed areas which would benefit from change or which made the realization of this important project improvement. possible. Paulina Florjanowicz Anne Aasheim Jørn Holme Jerzy Litwin Narodowy Instytut Dziedzictwa Norsk Kulturråd Riksantikvaren Centralne Muzeum Morskie 7 Overview Legal and illicit trade in cultural heritage Sidsel Bleken Counsellor at the Norwegian Embassy, responsible for the EEA, Norway grants, Cultural Exchange Fund he objective of the EEA and Nor- T way grants is to reduce social and economic disparities in Europe. The objec- tive is also to strengthen the bilateral rela- tionship between Poland and Norway. The protection of cultural heritage has been, and will continue to be, an important priority for the EEA and Nor- way grants. I am pleased that money is not only allocated to the revitalisation of monuments, but also to enforce the knowledge and awareness of the need for preventing illicit trade in cultural ob- jects. The Cultural Exchange Fund has been an important tool for increasing cultural cooperation and establishing long-term relationships between cultural People travel more and more, and in- objects that are traded on this black market institutions in Poland and Norway. I am creasingly to distant and exotic places. The are difficult to trace and to bring back. pleased that more than
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Uchwala Nr XIX.200.2020 Z Dnia 30 Grudnia 2020 R
    DZIENNIK URZĘDOWY WOJEWÓDZTWA MAŁOPOLSKIEGO Kraków, dnia 7 stycznia 2021 r. Poz. 136 UCHWAŁA NR XIX.200.2020 RADY GMINY LIPNICA MUROWANA z dnia 30 grudnia 2020 roku w sprawie przyjęcia „Programu opieki nad zabytkami gminy Lipnica Murowana na lata 2020 – 2023” Na podstawie art. 18 ust. 2 pkt 15 ustawy z dnia 8 marca 1990 r. o samorządzie gminnym (Dz. U. z 2020 r. poz. 713 z późn. zm.) oraz art. 87 ust. 3 i ust. 4 ustawy z dnia 23 lipca 2003 r. o ochronie zabytków i opiece nad zabytkami (Dz. U. z 2020 r. poz. 282 z późn. zm.) Rada Gminy Lipnica Murowana, po uzyskaniu pozytywnej opinii od Wojewódzkiego Konserwatora Zabytków, uchwala co następuje: § 1. Przyjmuje się „Program opieki nad zabytkami gminy Lipnica Murowana na lata 2020 – 2023” stanowiący załącznik do niniejszej uchwały. § 2. Wykonanie uchwały powierza się Wójtowi Gminy Lipnica Murowana. § 3. Uchwała podlega ogłoszeniu w Dzienniku Urzędowym Województwa Małopolskiego i wchodzi w życie po upływie 14 dni od dnia ogłoszenia. Przewodniczący Rady Gminy mgr inż. Damian Gaża Dziennik Urzędowy Województwa Małopolskiego – 2 – Poz. 136 Załącznik do Uchwały Nr XIX.200.2020 Rady Gminy Lipnica Murowana z dnia 30 grudnia 2020 roku WÓJT GMINY LIPNICA MUROWANA PROGRAM OPIEKI NAD ZABYTKAMI GMINY LIPNICA MUROWANA NA LATA 2020 – 2023 Opracowanie: mgr inż. Kama Kotowicz Lipnica Murowana, 2020 r. Dziennik Urzędowy Województwa Małopolskiego – 3 – Poz. 136 Program opieki nad zabytkami Gminy Lipnica Murowana na lata 2020–2023 SPIS TREŚCI 1. WPROWADZENIE ......................................................................................................................................... 3 2. PODSTAWA PRAWNA OPRACOWANIA GMINNEGO PROGRAMU OPIEKI NAD ZABYTKAMI6 3. UWARUNKOWANIA PRAWNE OCHRONY I OPIEKI NAD ZABYTKAMI W POLSCE ................
    [Show full text]
  • Florida State Courts 2016-2017 Annual Report a Preparatory Drawing of One of the Two Eagle Sculptures That Adorn the Rotunda of the Florida Supreme Court
    Florida State Courts 2016-2017 Annual Report A preparatory drawing of one of the two eagle sculptures that adorn the rotunda of the Florida Supreme Court. Sculpted by Panama City artist Roland Hockett, the copper eagles, which have graced the rotunda since 1991, represent American patriotism and the ideals of justice that this country strives to achieve. Mr. Hockett donated a drawing of each sculpture to the court in July 2017. The Supreme Court of Florida Florida State Courts Annual Report July 1, 2016 – June 30, 2017 Jorge Labarga Chief Justice Barbara J. Pariente R. Fred Lewis Peggy A. Quince Charles T. Canady Ricky Polston C. Alan Lawson Justices Patricia “PK” Jameson State Courts Administrator The 2016 – 2017 Florida State Courts Annual Report is published by The Office of the State Courts Administrator 500 South Duval Street Tallahassee, FL 32399-1900 Under the direction of Supreme Court Chief Justice Jorge Labarga State Courts Administrator Patricia “PK” Jameson Innovations and Outreach Chief Tina White Written/edited by Beth C. Schwartz, Court Publications Writer © 2018, Office of the State Courts Administrator, Florida. All rights reserved. Table of Contents Message from the Chief Justice .......................................................................................................................... 1 July 1, 2016 – June 30, 2017: The Year in Review ............................................................................................... 7 Long-Range Issue #1: Deliver Justice Effectively, Efficiently, and Fairly
    [Show full text]
  • CONGRESSIONAL RECORD·-SE:NATE. June 14
    7776 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD·-SE:NATE. JuNE 14, PUBLIC BILLS, ~ESOLUTIONS, AND l\IEMORL.t\LS. can Dramatists and Composers, protesting against the second- Under clause 3 of Rule XXII, bills, resolutions, and memorials class postal 1:ates .of the war-revenue act and asking its repeal; ''"ere introduced :m<l severally referred as follows: to the Comrmttee on Ways and l\feans. By Mr. l\IcARTHUR: A bill (H. R. 12463) to designate the na- By .Mr. DOOLirr:rr~~: Petition of cit~zens of Eskridge, Kans:, · tional service flag and national service emblem; to define or- favormg war prohibition! ~ the C?n;urutte~ on the Judiciary. ganizations and persons 'vho shall be entitled to display and . By .l\1~. FULLE~ of llllnOis.: Petltwn of the Woman's Chm"ch wear the same; and for other purposes; to the Committee on the 1 F.edeiatwn of ChiCago, favo1:mg passage of the minimum-wage Judiciary. bill for women; to the Committee on Labor. By l\Ir. l\IADDEN: Resolution (H. Res. 392) requesting infor-· By. 1\lr. GOULD: Petit~on of sundry Bible class members of mation at to the number of men in the sen·ice of the Food Admin- Baptist C~urch of Summ1.t, .N. Y., fayoring war prohibition; to i trator and Fuel Administrator who are within the draft age;. to the , Commi~t~e on the Judiciary. tile Committee on l\Iilitary Affairs. Also, peti.twn of th~ Potter (N.. Y:). Women's Christian Tern- By l\lr. CRAl\ITON: Resolution (H. Res. 394) requesting the perance.l!ruon, favormg war prohibition; to the Committee on President to report to the House of Representatives whether any the Judicmry.
    [Show full text]
  • Local Arrangements Guide for 2020
    SCS/AIA DC-area Local Arrangements Guide Contributors: • Norman Sandridge (co-chair), Howard University • Katherine Wasdin (co-chair), University of Maryland, College Park • Francisco Barrenechea, University of Maryland, College Park • Victoria Pedrick, Georgetown University • Elise Friedland, George Washington University • Brien Garnand, Howard University • Carolivia Herron, Howard University • Sarah Ferrario, Catholic University This guide contains information on the history of the field in the DC area, followed by things to do in the city with kids, restaurants within walking distance of the hotel and convention center, recommended museums, shopping and other entertainment activities, and two classically-themed walking tours of downtown DC. 2 History: In the greater Washington-Baltimore area classics has deep roots both in academics of our area’s colleges and universities and in the culture of both cities. From The Johns Hopkins University in Baltimore—with one of the oldest graduate programs in classics in the country to the University of Mary Washington in Fredericksburg, VA, classicists and archaeologists are a proud part of the academic scene, and we take pleasure in inviting you during the SCS and AIA meetings to learn more about the life and heritage of our professions. In Maryland, the University of Maryland at College Park has strong programs and offers graduate degrees in classical languages, ancient history, and ancient philosophy. But classics also flourishes at smaller institutions such as McDaniel College in Westminster, MD, and the Naval Academy in Annapolis. Right in the District of Columbia itself you will find four universities with strong ties to the classics through their undergraduate programs: The Catholic University of America, which also offers a PhD, Howard University, Georgetown University, and The Georgetown Washington University.
    [Show full text]
  • Szymon Datner German Nazi Crimes Against Jews Who
    JEWISH HISTORICAL INSTITUTE BULLETIN NO. 75 (1970) SZYMON DATNER GERMAN NAZI CRIMES AGAINST JEWS WHO ESCAPED FROM THE GHETTOES “LEGAL” THREATS AND ORDINANCES REGARDING JEWS AND THE POLES WHO HELPED THEM Among other things, the “final solution of the Jewish question” required that Jews be prohibited from leaving the ghettoes they were living in—which typically were fenced off and under guard. The occupation authorities issued inhumane ordinances to that effect. In his ordinance of October 15, 1941, Hans Frank imposed draconian penalties on Jews who escaped from the ghettoes and on Poles who would help them escape or give them shelter: “§ 4b (1) Jews who leave their designated quarter without authorisation shall be punished by death. The same penalty shall apply to persons who knowingly shelter such Jews. (2) Those who instigate and aid and abet shall be punished with the same penalty as the perpetrator; acts attempted shall be punished as acts committed. A penalty of severe prison sentence or prison sentence may be imposed for minor offences. (3) Sentences shall be passed by special courts.” 1 In the reality of the General Government (GG), § 4b (3) was never applied to runaway Jews. They would be killed on capture or escorted to the nearest police, gendarmerie, Gestapo or Kripo station and, after being identified as Jews and tortured to give away those who helped or sheltered them, summarily executed. Many times the same fate befell Poles, too, particularly those living in remote settlements and woodlands. The cases of Poles who helped Jews, which were examined by special courts, raised doubts even among the judges of this infamous institution because the only penalty stipulated by law (death) was so draconian.
    [Show full text]
  • Atrakcyjność Inwestycyjna Regionów 2010
    CENTRE FOR REGIONAL AND LOCAL ANALYSES REGIONAL INVESTMENT ATTRACTIVENESS 2012 Lesser Poland voivodship Dr hab. Hanna Godlewska-Majkowska, Ph. D. university professor at the Warsaw School of Economics Agnieszka Komor, Ph.D. Patrycjusz Zarębski, Ph.D. Magdalena Typa, M.A. 2012 Warsaw, October 2012 Regional investment attractiveness 2012 Introduction This report has been prepared thanks to the application of results of scientific research conducted since 2002 by the Institute of Enterprise, Collegium of Business Administration of the Warsaw School of Economics, under the supervision of Prof. H. Godlewska-Majkowska, Ph.D. All Authors are core members of the team that develops the methodology of calculating regional investment attractiveness in order that important characteristics of regions are captured as closely as possible both in general terms and from a point of view of specificity of a given kind of business activity as well as a size of investment. Potential investment attractiveness (PAI) indices measure the location-specific advantages of regions. In their simplified version they are calculated for territorial units of various levels of statistical division of the country (gminas/communes, poviats/counties, subregions, voivodships/regions). These are PAI1 indices, which refer to the whole regional/national economy (PAI1_GN) and selected sections: C – manufacturing industry, G – trade and repair, I – tourism and catering, M – professional, scientific and technical services. Besides, some indices are only calculated for voidoships on the basis of much more characteristics available on the regional or macroregional level. This allows us to evaluate their investment attractiveness in a much broader context. These are PAI2 indices, which are calculated both from a general point of view and with reference to the above mentioned sections of the economy (PAI2_C, PAI2_G, PAI2_I, PAI2_M).
    [Show full text]
  • M.P.Z.P. Gminy Lipnica Murowana
    UCHWAŁA NR ...................... RADY GMINY LIPNICA MUROWANA z dnia ............................ w sprawie zmiany Miejscowego Planu Zagospodarowania Przestrzennego Gminy Lipnica Murowana Na podstawie: art. 18 ust. 2 pkt 5 ustawy z dnia 8 marca 1990 r. o samorządzie gminnym (tekst jednolity: Dz. U. z 2001 r. Nr 142 poz. 1591 z późn. zm.) oraz na podstawie art. 15, art. 16 ust. 1 i art. 20 ust. 1 ustawy z dnia 27 marca 2003 r. o planowaniu i zagospodarowaniu przestrzennym (Dz. U. Nr 80 poz. 717 z późn. zm.) i art. 7 ust.1 ustawy z dnia 3 lutego 1995 r. o ochronie gruntów rolnych i leśnych (tekst jednolity: Dz. U. z 2004 r. Nr 121 poz. 1266 z późn. zm.), art. 4 ust. 1 i art. 13 pkt 2 ustawy z dnia 20 lipca 2000 r. o ogłaszaniu aktów normatywnych i niektórych innych aktów prawnych (tekst jednolity: Dz. U. z 2011 r. Nr 197 poz. 1172 z późn. zm.), po stwierdzeniu zgodności projektu zmiany „Miejscowego planu zagospodarowania przestrzennego Gminy Lipnica Murowana” ze „Studium uwarunkowań i kierunków zagospodarowania przestrzennego Gminy Lipnica Murowana”, uchwalonego Uchwałą Nr IV/21/99 Rady Gminy Lipnica Murowana z dnia 18 stycznia 1999 r. – w granicach opracowania, Rada Gminy Lipnica Murowana uchwala co następuje: DZIAŁ I USTALENIA FORMALNO-PRAWNE ROZDZIAŁ 1 ZAKRES USTALEŃ PLANU § 1 1. Uchwala się zmianę „Miejscowego planu zagospodarowania przestrzennego Gminy Lipnica Murowana”, zwaną dalej planem. 2. Plan obejmuje obszar Gminy Lipnica Murowana w granicach administracyjnych jednostek osadniczych, w tym następujących miejscowości: Lipnica Górna, Lipnica Dolna, Lipnica Murowana, Rajbrot, Borówna. 3. Treść niniejszej uchwały stanowi tekst planu.
    [Show full text]
  • Arlington Memorial Bridge Adjacent to the Base of the Lincoln Memorial
    Arlington Memorial Bridge HAER No. DC-7 Adjacent to the base of the Lincoln Memorial, spanning the Potomac River to Arlington Cemetery, VA. Washington District of Columbia PHOTOGRAPHS WRITTEN HISTORICAL AND DESCRIPTIVE DATA Historic American Engineering Record National Park Service Department of the Interior Washington, DC 20013-7127 HISTORIC AMERICAN ENGINEERING RECORD ARLINGTON MEMORIAL BRIDGE HAER No. DC-7 Location: Adjacent to the base of the Lincoln Memorial, Washington, D.C., spanning the Potomac River to Arlington Cemetery, Arlington, VA. UTM: 18/321680/4306600 Quad.: Washington West Date of Construction: Designed 1929, Completed 1932 Architects: McKim, Mead and White, New York, New York; William Mitchell Kendall, Designer Engineer: John L. Nagle, W.J. Douglas, Consulting Engineer, Joseph P. Strauss, Bascule Span Engineer Contractor: Forty contractors under the supervision of the Arlington Bridge Commission Present Owner: National Capital Region National Park Service Department of the Interior Present Use: Vehicular and pedestrian bridge Significance: As the final link in the chain of monuments which start at the Capitol building, the Arlington Memorial Bridge connects the Mall in Washington, D.C. with Arlington National Cemetery in Virginia. Designed to connect, both physically and symbolically, the North and the South, this bridge, as designed in the Neoclassical style, complements the other monumental buildings in Washington such as the White House, the Lincoln Memorial, and the Jefferson Memorial. Memorial Bridge was designed by William Mitchell Kendall while in the employ of McKim, Mead and White, a prominent architectural firm based in New York City. Although designed and built almost thirty years after the McMillan Commission had been disbanded, this structure reflects the original intention of the Commission which was to build a memorial bridge on this site which would join the North and South.
    [Show full text]
  • Historical Perspective of Heritage Legislation
    HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE OF HERITAGE LEGISLATION. BALANCE BETWEEN LAWS AND VALUES HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE OF HERITAGE LEGISLATION. BALANCE BETWEEN LAWS AND VALUES 2 HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE OF HERITAGE LEGISLATION. BALANCE BETWEEN LAWS AND VALUES International conference October 12-13, 2016 Niguliste Museum Tallinn, Estonia Conference proceedings Conference team: ICOMOS Estonia NC; ICLAFI; Estonian Academy of Arts; Tallinn Urban Planning Department Division of Heritage Protection; Estonian National Heritage Board Publication: ICOMOS Estonia NC; ICLAFI; Estonian Academy of Arts Editors: Riin Alatalu, Anneli Randla, Laura Ingerpuu, Diana Haapsal Design and layout: Elle Lepik Photos: authors, Tõnu Noorits Tallinn 2017 ISBN 978-9949-88-197-0 (pdf) The conference and meetings of ICLAFI and Nordic-Baltic ICOMOS National Committees were supported by: Estonian Academy of Arts, Tallinn Urban Planning Department Division of Heritage Protection, National Heritage Board, Ministry of Culture, Nordic Council of Ministers Published with the financial support from Estonian Cultural Foundation © ICOMOS ESTONIA NC, 2017 © ICLAFI, 2017 © Authors of the articles, 2017 international council on monuments and sites HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE OF HERITAGE LEGISLATION. BALANCE BETWEEN LAWS AND VALUES 3 CONTENTS 4 TOSHIYUKI KONO Foreword 81 JAMES K. REAP WHAT’S OLD IS NEW AGAIN: CHARLES XI’S 1666 CONSERVATION ACT VIEWED FROM 21ST CENTURY AMERICA 5 RIIN ALATALU Conference proceedings 6 THOMAS ADLERCREUTZ THE ROYAL PLACAT OF 1666. BRIEFLY 91 ERNESTO BECERRIL MIRÓ and ROBERTO
    [Show full text]
  • Lipnica Murowana Was Built in the 14Th Century on a Cruciform Plan
    1. St. Andrew’s Church in Lipnica Murowana was built in the 14th century on a cruciform plan. The nave and the chancel form the longer part of the building. There are side chapels both on the right and left side halfway along the church, forming the arms of the cross. A sacristy was later added on the left side of the chancel, as viewed from the main entrance. The whole church building is 28 meters long. At the widest, that is across the side chapels, it is 20 meters wide. A 31-meter-high tower rises above the facade. The church is covered with a gable roof made of new ceramic tiles of brick-red colour. The walls are plastered and painted cream. The facade was built of irregular blocks of sandstone. The last renovation took place between 2009 and 2011. The frontal wall of the facade is supported with two massive buttresses. They are several meters high masonry elements that reinforce the sides of the building. Above the facade and the vestibule ascends a massive quadrilateral tower. It is plastered. There is a clock at the top of each of its walls. Light-coloured hands cruise around black dial plates with Roman numerals. Beneath the clocks, there are semicircular windows without panes. The facade features a window topped with a soft arch. It is filled with stained glass. Underneath the window is the main entrance. The stone arch-shaped portal is an original medieval element. The entrance is guarded by a black forged gate. The side chapel on the right has one window and a vestibule with a door.
    [Show full text]
  • Genocide-Holodomor 1932–1933: the Losses of the Ukrainian Nation”
    TARAS SHEVCHENKO NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF KYIV NATIONAL MUSEUM “HOLODOMOR VICTIMS MEMORIAL” UKRAINIAN GENOCIDE FAMINE FOUNDATION – USA, INC. MAKSYM RYLSKY INSTITUTE OF ART, FOLKLORE STUDIES, AND ETHNOLOGY MYKHAILO HRUSHEVSKY INSTITUTE OF UKRAINIAN ARCHAEOGRAPHY AND SOURCE STUDIES PUBLIC COMMITTEE FOR THE COMMEMORATION OF THE VICTIMS OF HOLODOMOR-GENOCIDE 1932–1933 IN UKRAINE ASSOCIATION OF FAMINE RESEARCHERS IN UKRAINE VASYL STUS ALL-UKRAINIAN SOCIETY “MEMORIAL” PROCEEDINGS OF THE INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC- EDUCATIONAL WORKING CONFERENCE “GENOCIDE-HOLODOMOR 1932–1933: THE LOSSES OF THE UKRAINIAN NATION” (October 4, 2016, Kyiv) Kyiv 2018 УДК 94:323.25 (477) “1932/1933” (063) Proceedings of the International Scientific-Educational Working Conference “Genocide-Holodomor 1932–1933: The Losses of the Ukrainian Nation” (October 4, 2016, Kyiv). – Kyiv – Drohobych: National Museum “Holodomor Victims Memorial”, 2018. x + 119. This collection of articles of the International Scientific-Educational Working Conference “Genocide-Holodomor 1932–1933: The Losses of the Ukrainian Nation” reveals the preconditions and causes of the Genocide- Holodomor of 1932–1933, and the mechanism of its creation and its consequences leading to significant cultural, social, moral, and psychological losses. The key issue of this collection of articles is the problem of the Ukrainian national demographic losses. This publication is intended for historians, researchers, ethnologists, teachers, and all those interested in the catastrophe of the Genocide-Holodomor of 1932–1933. Approved for publication by the Scientific and Methodological Council of the National Museum “Holodomor Victims Memorial” (Protocol No. 9 of 25 September 2018). Editorial Board: Cand. Sc. (Hist.) Olesia Stasiuk, Dr. Sc. (Hist.) Vasyl Marochko, Dr. Sc. (Hist.), Prof. Volodymyr Serhijchuk, Dr. Sc.
    [Show full text]
  • 2015 Conference Program
    THURSDAY, NOVEMBER, 12 Democracy in the former Soviet republics: Trends and THURSDAY, 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. Idiosyncracies Kunihiko Imai, Elmira College; Robert Nalbandov, Utah State University REGISTRATION 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. How the Euro Divides the Union: Economic Adjustment and Loews Philadelphia Hotel: Floor Third -Lobby Support for Democracy in Europe Klaus Armingeon, University of Bern; Kai Guthmann, University of Bern; THURSDAY, 8:45 a.m. to 10:15 a.m. David Weisstanner, University of Bern Elites and the Welfare State in a New Democracy Taesim Kim, A-1 Competing for Power and Influence in a Partisan Age University of Connecticut Paper Session Chair: 8:45 to 10:15 am Mary Stegmaier, University of Missouri Loews Philadelphia Hotel: Floor Third - Jefferson Discussant: Participants: Miguel Glatzer, La Salle University Party Polarization by Vote Type in Congress, 1947 - 2012 Eric Paul Svensen, University of Texas G-1 Cases, Interests, and Actors in American and British Foreign Presidential Signing Statements: Tools of Polarization Brandon Policy Russell Johnson, Monmouth University Paper Session Voting for Gun Control Jordan Ragusa, College of Charleston 8:45 to 10:15 am Chair: Loews Philadelphia Hotel: Floor Third - Washington B Mack David Mariani, Xavier University Participants: Discussant: British Non-Intervention in the American Civil War Mark Lanethea Mathews-Schultz, Muhlenberg College William Petersen, Bethany College Enhancing Global Leadership and Order: The US' African B-1 Creating Political Space Growth and Opportunity Act. Peter Sekyere, Brock Panel University 8:45 to 10:15 am The dilemma of the American policy towards Islamists in Egypt Loews Philadelphia Hotel: Floor Fourth - Congress A since Morsi's Ouster Marwa Hamouda Ahmed Wasfy, Cairo Participants: University Minor Party Movements: Minor Parties, Social Movements, and Chair: Fringe Interests in America Catherine Kane, University of Paul S.
    [Show full text]