Uncdf Special Projects Implementation Review Exercise – Spire –

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Uncdf Special Projects Implementation Review Exercise – Spire – UNCDF SPECIAL PROJECTS IMPLEMENTATION REVIEW EXERCISE – SPIRE – FINAL REVIEW SUPPORT TO THE LOCAL ECONOMY IN MWANZA PROGRAMME (SLEM) Tanzania May 2011 EVALUATION TEAM Team Leader Philip Bottern Team Members Andrea Agostinucci, Nazar Sola UNCDF Evaluation Unit Officer UNCDF Special Projects Implementation Review Exercise (SPIRE) Final Review: Support to Local Economy Mwanza - SLEM, Tanzania © UNCDF (2011), all rights reserved. The analysis and recommendations of this report do not necessarily reflect the views of the United Nations Capital Development Fund, its Executive Board or the United Nations Member States. This is an independent publication by UNCDF and reflects the views of its authors. Design: UNCDF Partnerships Unit. CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................................................................. 1 2. PURPOSE OF THE EVALUATION ......................................................................................................................................................... 1 2.1. Scope and Objectives of the Evaluation ....................................................................................................................... 1 2.2. Evaluation Methodology and Limitations ................................................................................................................... 1 3. COUNTRY CONTEXT ......................................................................................................................................................................... 5 3.1. Central Government and its De-Concentration......................................................................................................... 5 3.2. Local Government Structure ............................................................................................................................................ 5 3.3. LGA Functions ....................................................................................................................................................................... 6 3.4. Local government Planning ............................................................................................................................................. 7 4. PROGRAMME PROFILE ...................................................................................................................................................................... 8 4.1. Programme Description .................................................................................................................................................... 8 4.2. Programme Implementation ........................................................................................................................................... 9 4.3. SLEM’s Five Main Outputs and Related Implementation Status ....................................................................... 12 4.4. Programme Financial Data ............................................................................................................................................ 17 5. EVALUATION FINDINGS ................................................................................................................................................................. 20 5.1. A Highly Relevant Programme Inadequately Designed ...................................................................................... 20 5.2. The Programme has Established a Valuable Basis for Enhancing LED Systems, but this is yet to be fully Translated into an Expansion of the relevant Functions and Capacities of LGAs........................ 24 5.3. The Programme has Provided an Adequate Basis for Strategic Analysis and Assessment, but the Integration of LED Strategies within the Broader Planning and Budgeting Process is still Limited ..... 31 5.4. The Programme’s Investments in Support to Local Economies has Constituted a Relevant and Useful Support for Income Generation but Lacked the Scale and Means to Play a Strategic Function in Triggering LED ............................................................................................................................................ 34 5.5. Strong Ownership of Programme Activities by SLEM Actors and Set-Up within Existing Institutions are Promising Features for Programme Sustainability ................................................................. 39 5.6. Management of the Programme has been Effective with Adequate Set-Up at Regional and Local Level ........................................................................................................................................................................... 41 5.7. Without a Systematic Effort, the Programme has Provided some Inputs to the Government on LED and LGA Mandate for LED ..................................................................................................................................... 43 5.8. The Programme has not established effective Partnerships with the Government and donors nor UNDP after “one UN” concept started ............................................................................................................... 44 6. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS .................................................................................................................................... 46 6.1. Overall Assessment .......................................................................................................................................................... 46 6.2. Specific Conclusions ........................................................................................................................................................ 47 6.3. Recommendations ........................................................................................................................................................... 49 Annexes ANNEX 1: TOR DEVELOPED BY UNCDF ................................................................................................................................................ 52 ANNEX 2: BIBLIOGRAPHY ........................................................................................................................................................................ 67 ANNEX 3: LIST OF PERSONS MET ............................................................................................................................................................. 69 ANNEX 4. MISSION PLAN ........................................................................................................................................................................ 75 ANNEX 5: TOTAL PROGRAMME EXPENDITURE ....................................................................................................................................... 77 ANNEX 6: MANAGEMENT RESPONSE MATRIX ...................................................................................................................................... 79 ANNEX 7. EVALUATION MATRIX ADJUSTED TO SLEM ........................................................................................................................... 81 ANNEX 8: OPINION SURVEYS FOR REGIONAL AND DISTRICT STAKEHOLDERS ................................................................................... 102 i List of Tables TABLE 1: SUMMARY OF CORE EVALUATION QUESTIONS ..............................................................................................2 TABLE 2: SUMMARY WORK-PLAN ..........................................................................................................................................4 TABLE 3. MWANZA REGION, POPULATION (2002), AREA AND LGA STRUCTURE ..................................................8 TABLE 4: SLEM: GOAL, OUTCOMES, AND OUTPUTS ........................................................................................................8 TABLE 5: SUMMARY PROGRAMME IMPLEMENTATION STATUS ............................................................................... 10 TABLE 6: DISTRICT FORUM LOCAL ECONOMY AND COORDINATION COMMITTEE MEETINGS ..................... 13 TABLE 7: BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT SHOP ACTIVITY .................................................................................................... 14 TABLE 8: REGISTRATION OF ECONOMIC GROUPS ......................................................................................................... 14 TABLE 9: SLEM. TRAINING AND CAPACITY DEVELOPMENT ....................................................................................... 15 TABLE 10: PROVISION OF LOANS TO ECONOMIC GROUPS 2008-2010 .................................................................. 15 TABLE 11: LOANS, PAYBACK RATE AND CAPITAL ......................................................................................................... 15 TABLE 12: DELIVERY (PER DONOR), USD: ......................................................................................................................... 17 TABLE 13: BUDGET, EXPENDITURES AND PERCENTAGE EXECUTED: 2006 TO 2010 .......................................... 17 TABLE 14: SLEM’S RELEVANCE VIS À VIS THE MAIN NATIONAL AND DONORS’ STRATEGIC FRAMEWORKS ............................................................................................................................................................................................ 22 TABLE 15: SUMMARY DFLE ANALYSIS..............................................................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Appeal E-Mail: [email protected] Coordinating Office
    150 route de Ferney, P.O. Box 2100 1211 Geneva 2, Switzerland Tel: 41 22 791 6033 Fax: 41 22 791 6506 Appeal e-mail: [email protected] Coordinating Office Tanzania Food Relief Assistance – AFTZ61 Appeal Target: US$ 741,141 Geneva, 21 March 2006 Dear Colleagues, The latest Tanzanian government report on the food situation shows that from February to April, 3.76 million people - more than 10 percent of the country's population- will need 99,676 tonnes of maize food aid. According to the country's Ministry of Agriculture and Food Security the food deficit in Tanzania is linked to the failure of short rains between August and November 2005 which account for 30% of annual harvests in the country. A Rapid Vulnerability Assessment carried out by the government, WFP, and NGOs in early February identified 564,000 of the total impacted population as being destitute and in need of free food distribution. To date, the government of Tanzania has not declared a national emergency but WFP and NGOs are concerned that government resources are insufficient to meet the urgent needs of this vulnerable population. The long rainy season is now expected between March and May, but if it fails or comes too late, the number of people needing food relief could go up. ACT member the Christian Council of Tanzania (CCT) is appealing for assistance to provide food relief to approximately 80,500 of the most destitute people in seven regions in rural Tanzania, to be distributed through its member churches the Anglican Church of Tanzania (ACT), the Evangelical Lutheran Church in Tanzania (ELCT), the African Inland Church of Tanzania (AIC) and the Mennonite Church of Tanzania (MEN) stationed across the country.
    [Show full text]
  • Schistosoma Mansoni-Related Hepatosplenic Morbidity in Adult Population on Kome Island, Sengerema District, Tanzania
    ISSN (Print) 0023-4001 ISSN (Online) 1738-0006 Korean J Parasitol Vol. 53, No. 5: 545-551, October 2015 ▣ ORIGINAL ARTICLE http://dx.doi.org/10.3347/kjp.2015.53.5.545 Schistosoma mansoni-Related Hepatosplenic Morbidity in Adult Population on Kome Island, Sengerema District, Tanzania 1 2 1 3, 4 5 Godfrey M. Kaatano , Duk-Young Min , Julius E. Siza , Tai-Soon Yong *, Jong-Yil Chai , Yunsuk Ko , Su-Young Chang5, John M. Changalucha1 , Keeseon S. Eom6, Han-Jong Rim7 1National Institute for Medical Research, P.O. Box 1462, Mwanza, Tanzania; 2Department of Immunology and Microbiology, Eulji University School of Medicine, Daejeon 34824, Korea; 3Department of Environmental Medical Biology, Institute of Tropical Medicine and Arthropods of Medical Importance Resource Bank, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul 03722, Korea; 4Department of Parasitology and Tropical Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul 03080, Korea; 5Good Neighbors International, Tanzania Western Chapter, P.O. Box 367, Mwanza, Tanzania; 6Department of Parasitology, Medical Research Institute and Parasite Resource Bank, Chungbuk National University School of Medicine, Cheongju 28644, Korea; 7Department of Parasitology, College of Medicine, Korea University, Seoul 02841, Korea Abstract: Schistosomiasis is one of the important neglected tropical diseases (NTDs) in Tanzania, particularly in Lake Vic- toria zone. This baseline survey was a part of the main study of integrated control of schistosomiasis and soil-transmitted helminths (STHs) aimed at describing morbidity patterns due to intestinal schistosomiasis among adults living on Kome Island, Sengerema District, Tanzania. Total 388 adults from Kome Islands (about 50 people from each village) aged be- tween 12 and 85 years, were examined by abdominal ultrasound according to the Niamey protocol.
    [Show full text]
  • Sengerema District Council BMC Research Team (Facilitators
    SHP NEED ASSESSMENT SURVEY DISSEMINATION REPORT Date: 9/3/2017 Venue: Sengerema District Council BMC research team (facilitators): Dr. Wemaeli Mweteni (PI), Dr. Pastory Mondea(CoI) and Flora Bukindu (CoI). 1 ABBREVIATIONS SHP School Health Program WDC Ward Council Committee RHD Rheumatic Heart Disease BMC Bugando Medical Centre SWASH School Water, Sanitation and Hygiene NGO Non Governmental Organization ARF Acute Rheumatic Fever URTIs Upper Respiratory Tract Infections PHC Primary Health Care TOT Trainer of Trainer 2 Table of content 1. Background ......................................................................................................................................... 4 2. Summarized findings ........................................................................................................................... 5 3. Arising issues that were discussed and the way forward: ...................................................................... 9 ANNEX 1A: DISSEMINATION MEETING PARTICIPANT LIST ...................................................... 12 ANNEX 1B: SUMMARIZED PARTICIPANT CATEGORIES ............................................................. 14 ANNEX 2: MEETING OPENING ANNEXES ...................................................................................... 15 ANNEX 3: FACILITATION ................................................................................................................. 18 ANNEX 4: WAY FORWARD .............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • TANZANIA OSAKA ALUMNI Best Practices Hand Book 5
    TOA Best Practices Handbook 5 TANZANIA OSAKA ALUMNI Best Practices Hand Book 5 President’s Office, Regional Administration and Local Government, P.O. Box 1923, Dodoma. December, 2017 TOA Best Practices Handbook 5 BEST PRACTICES HAND BOOK 5 (2017) Prepared for Tanzania Osaka Alumni (TOA) by: Paulo Faty, Lecturer, Mzumbe University; Ahmed Nassoro, Assistant Lecturer, LGTI; Michiyuki Shimoda, Senior Advisor, PO-RALG Edited by Liana A. Hassan, TOA Vice Chairperson; Paulo Faty, Lecturer, Mzumbe University; Ahmed Nassoro, Assistant Lecturer, LGTI; Honorina Ng’omba, National Expert, JICA TOA Best Practices Handbook 5 Table of Contents Content Page List of Abbreviations i Foreword iii Preface (TOA) iv Preface (JICA) v CHAPTER ONE: INTRODUCTION: LESSONS LEARNT FROM JAPANESE 1 EXPERIENCE CHAPTER TWO: SELF HELP EFFORTS FOR IMPROVED SERVICE 14 DELIVERY Mwanza CC: Participatory Water Hyacinth Control In Lake Victoria 16 Geita DC: Village Self Help Efforts For Improved Service Delivery 24 Chato DC: Community Based Establishment Of Satellite Schools 33 CHAPTER THREE: FISCAL DECENTRALIZATION AND REVENUE 41 ENHANCEMENT Bariadi DC: Revenue Enhancement for Improved Service delivery 42 CHAPTER FOUR: PARTICIPATORY SERVICE DELIVERY 50 Itilima DC: Community Based Environmental Conservation and Income 53 Generation Misungwi DC: Improving Livelihood and Education For Children With 62 Albinism Musoma DC: Promotion of Community Health Fund for Improved Health 70 Services Bukombe DC: Participatory Water Supply Scheme Management 77 Ngara DC: Participatory Road Opening
    [Show full text]
  • Mwanza Region Socio-Economic Profile
    THE UNITED REPUBLIC OF TANZANIA MWANZA REGION SOCIO-ECONOMIC PROFILE UGANDA RWANDA KENYA BURUNDI MWANZA ZAMBIA MSUMBIJI Joint Publication by: THE PLANNING COMMISSION DAR ES SALAAM and REGIONAL COMMISSIONER'S OFFICE MWANZA TABLE OF CONTENTS Page FOREWORD............................................................................................................................... v SECTION I...................................................................................................................................1 LAND PEOPLE AND CLIMATE.............................................................................................1 1.0 REGIONAL OVERVIEW .......................................................................................................1 1.1 GEOGRAPHICAL LOCATION............................................................................................1 LAND AREA AND ADMINISTRATIVE UNITS ...................................................................1 1.2 ETHNIC GROUPS:.................................................................................................................4 1.3 POPULATION SIZE GROWTH AND DENSITY:.............................................................4 1.4 MIGRATION:.......................................................................................................................18 1.5 EMPLOYMENT:..................................................................................................................21 1.6 CLIMATE AND SOILS: .....................................................................................................22
    [Show full text]
  • United Republic of Tanzania
    UNITED REPUBLIC OF TANZANIA PRESIDENT’S OFFICE REGIONAL ADMINISTRATION AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT MWANZA CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN 2016/2017-2020/2021 City Director Mwanza City Council P. O. Box 1333 Mwanza Phone: +255-28-2501375 + 255-28-40334 Fax: 255-028-2500785 Email: [email protected] NOVEMBER, 2017 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This strategic plan has taken into account the strategic location of Mwanza city council as an economic hub for industrialisation and trading with great lake countries and East African community. Mwanza City Council is committed to be an economic hub with conducive environment for investment and provision of high quality services for sustainable development of all community members. This shall be realised through creating enabling environment for investment and provide high quality service through efficient utilization of available resource. The city’s long term dream shall be achieved through realized through strategic objectives which are coded from A to J. That include: A. Services Improved and HIV/AIDS Infections Reduced; B. National Anti-Corruption Implementation Strategy Enhanced and Sustained; C. Access to Quality and Equitable Social Services Delivery Improved; D. Quality and Quantity of Socio-Economic Services and Infrastructure Increased; E. Good Governance and Administrative Services Enhanced; F. Social Welfare, Gender and Community Empowerment Improved; G. Management of Natural Resources and Environment Enhanced and Sustained; H. Local Economic Development Coordination Enhanced; I. Emergency and Disaster Management Improved and j. Information and communication Technology improved. Participatory approach was used in the process of strategic plan preparation with involvement of Management team of the city council who were head of departments, head of units and consortium of other stakeholders.
    [Show full text]
  • Determinants of Women's Participation in the Industrial
    East African Journal of Education and Social Sciences EAJESS April – June 2021, Vol. 2, No. 2, pp. 169-178 ISSN: 2714-2132 (Online), 2714-2183 (Print), Copyright © The Author(s) Published by G-Card DOI: https://doi.org/10.46606/eajess2021v02i02.0087 URL: http://eajess.ac.tz Determinants of Women’s Participation in the Industrial Economy in Tanzania: A Case of Mwanza Region Dr. Kaihula P. Bishagazi Saint Augustine University of Tanzania *Corresponding Mail: [email protected] Abstract: This paper presents findings of an empirical study carried out to identify barriers and enablers of women’s participation in the industrial economy in Tanzania, using a case study of Mwanza region, using a cross-sectional design to examine determinants of women participation in the industrial economy in Tanzania. Particularly, a mixed approach involving both qualitative and quantitative data was adopted. Generally, the study reached out to a total of 228 women and 21 Key Informants drawn from 12 sampled wards from two districts of Nyamagana and Sengerema. Data collection involved mainly two approaches: primary data collection through survey, Key Informant Interviews (semi- structured), informal interviews, Focus Group Discussions and secondary data through desk review. The study revealed that limited access to financing information, lack of formal education, lack of entrepreneurial knowledge/skills and lack of marketing information are major barriers for women wishing to participate in the industrial economy. Moreover, membership in CBO and self-confidence are the main enablers of women participation in the industrial economy. Therefore, sensitization programs and establishment of Business Development Services (BDS) at ward levels would help women to access skills and services which will empower them to actively and successfully participate in the industrial economy.
    [Show full text]
  • Kwimba District Strategic Plan 2016 - 2021
    THE UNITED REPUBLIC OF TANZANIA PRESIDENT’S OFFICE REGIONAL ADMINISTRATION AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT KWIMBA DISTRICT STRATEGIC PLAN 2016 - 2021 DISTRICT EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, P.O.BOX 88, NGUDU-KWIMBA. Tel: 0732 - 980528 Fax: 0732- 980844 December 2017 1 Contents ABBREVIATIONS ................................................................................................................... 4 FOREWORD ............................................................................................................................. 5 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT ......................................................................................................... 6 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ....................................................................................................... 7 CHAPTER ONE: INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION .................... 8 1.1 Location ......................................................................................................................................... 8 1.2. Climate, Soil and Topography: ..................................................................................................... 8 1.2.1 Climate ............................................................................................................................ 8 1.2.2 Soil ................................................................................................................................... 9 1.2.3 Topography ....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • TOR Final Report JIJENGE Filling the Gap Draft Report
    FINAL EVALUATION OF JIJENGE PROJECT – FILLING THE GAP “Strengthening the right of women to receive health assistance through community sensitisation and training of Health Service Providers in Mwanza and Mara Regions” Drawn By: W & J Research Consultants and Data Solutions P. O. Box 6130, Mwanza, Tanzania. E-mail: [email protected], September 2010 TABLE OF CONTENTS ACRONYMS .................................................................................................................. iv CHAPTER 1 .................................................................................................................... 1 INTRODUCTION............................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Background Information .................................................................................... 1 1.2 Objective and Scope of the Evaluation ............................................................. 3 1.3 Evaluation Model: Theory and Framework........................................................ 4 1.4 Methodology, Sampling and Data Collection .................................................... 6 CHAPTER 2 .................................................................................................................. 10 Findings......................................................................................................................... 10 2.1 Project Intervention Logic ............................................................................... 10 2.1.1 Phase I of
    [Show full text]
  • Impact of Telecommunications on Rural Livelihoods: Tanzania Sengerema District
    IMPACT OF TELECOMMUNICATIONS ON RURAL LIVELIHOODS: TANZANIA SENGEREMA DISTRICT by Christine Mwase on behalf of Prof Ophelia Mascarenhas (Research Team Leader) Commission for Science and Technology (COSTECH) 8th June 2005, Golden Tulip, Dar es Salaam 1 Sengerema District Location: Mwanza Region - southern shore of Lake Victoria. Getting there: Flight / Road / Rail to Mwanza then Ferry to Sengerema. Main livelihood activities: Fisheries, agriculture, mining, and livestock keeping. Fishing is becoming increasingly important. 2 Why Sengerema? Sengerema has a lake. Prospect of getting a different type of rural livelihood (different from the other two districts). Due to its proximity to the Lake, fishing is a major activity. Sengerema has a telecentre. Telecentre was initiated and sponsored by the Tanzania Commission for Science and Technology (COSTECH). Prospect of getting different insights into the use of telecommunications in the district. The presence of the telecentre did not greatly affect the use and impact of the telecommunications in the district. 3 Field Study Schedule Dates: 9th August – 18th August. Team: Group of 7 researchers led by Prof. Ophelia Mascarenhas. Villages: 9th –10th August: Travel to Sengerema, courtesy calls and planning. 11th August Fieldwork in Isabageni village. 12th August Fieldwork in Tunyenye village. 13th August Fieldwork in Sima village. 14th August Fieldwork in Tabaruka village. 15th August Fieldwork in Nyamisege village. 16th August Fieldwork in Katunguru village. 17th August Fieldwork in Kijiweni village. 18th –19th August: Courtesy calls and travel to Dar es Salaam. 4 Selection of the Sample Sample of villages 7 villages were selected. The basic criteria were distance from the Sengerema District Headquarters and the inclusion of fishermen in at least one of the villages.
    [Show full text]
  • Mwanza City Council Socio-Economic Profile, 2016
    The United Republic of Tanzania MWANZA CITY COUNCIL SOCIO-ECONOMIC PROFILE, 2016 January, 2017 1 The United Republic of Tanzania MWANZA CITY COUNCIL SOCIO-ECONOMIC PROFILE, 2016 Jointly prepared by Ministry of Finance, National Bureau of Statistics and Mwanza City Council National Bureau of Statistics Mwanza City Council Dar es Salaam Mwanza Region January, 2017 2 Foreword The goals of Tanzania’s Development Vision 2030 are in line with United Nation’s Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) .The major goals are to achieve a high- quality livelihood for the people, achieve food security, develop a strong and competitive economy, to ensure equality and empower all women and girls. Monitoring the progress in achieving these goals needs for timely and accurate statistical information at all levels Problems especially in urban areas are many and demanding. Social and economic services require sustainable improvement. The high primary school enrolment rates recently attained have to be maintained and so is the policy of making sure that all pupils who pass standard seven examinations join Form One. The food situation is still precarious; infant and maternal mortality rates continue to be high and unemployment triggers mass migration of youths from rural areas to the already overcrowded urban centres. Added to the above problems, is the menace posed by HIV/AIDS, the prevalence of which hinders efforts to advance into the 21st century of science and technology. The pandemic has been quite severe among the economically active population leaving in its wake an increasing number of orphans, broken families and much suffering. AIDS together with environmental deterioration are the new developmental problems which cannot be ignored.
    [Show full text]
  • Options to Promote Effectiveness of Formal Institutions in Water Resources Management in Lake Victoria Basin: a Case Study of Ukerewe District, Mwanza, Tanzania
    The University of Dodoma University of Dodoma Institutional Repository http://repository.udom.ac.tz Social Sciences Master Dissertations 2013 Options to promote effectiveness of formal institutions in water resources management in lake Victoria basin: a case study of Ukerewe district, Mwanza, Tanzania. Linuma, Oswin F. The University of Dodoma Linuma, O. F. (2013). Options to promote effectiveness of formal institutions in water resources management in lake Victoria basin: a case study of Ukerewe district, Mwanza, Tanzania. Dodoma: The University of Dodoma http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12661/1282 Downloaded from UDOM Institutional Repository at The University of Dodoma, an open access institutional repository. OPTIONS TO PROMOTE EFFECTIVENESS OF FORMAL INSTITUTIONS IN WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT IN LAKE VICTORIA BASIN: A CASE STUDY OF UKEREWE DISTRICT, MWANZA, TANZANIA. Oswin Filbert Linuma A Dissertation submitted in fulfillment of the requirements for the Master of Arts in Development Studies of the University of Dodoma The University of Dodoma October, 2013 CERTIFICATION The undersigned certifies that has read and here recommends for acceptance by the University of Dodoma a Dissertation titled, “Options to Promote Effectiveness of Formal Institutions in Water Resources Management in Lake Victoria Basin: A Case Study of Ukerewe District, Mwanza, Tanzania” in Partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in Development Studies of the University of Dodoma. …………………………………………………………. Dr. Albino J. M Tenge (Supervisor) Date …………. i DECLARATION AND COPYRIGHT I, Linuma, Oswin .F, declare that this dissertation is my own original work and that it has not been presented and will not be presented to any other university for a similar or any other degree award.
    [Show full text]