State-Led Gentrification and Staying Put Resistance in Nieuw-Crooswijk & Vreewijk

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

State-Led Gentrification and Staying Put Resistance in Nieuw-Crooswijk & Vreewijk State-led gentrification and staying put Resistance in Nieuw-Crooswijk & Vreewijk Daniël Bossuyt – 100079036 Bachelor Thesis Supervisor: dr. Darshan Vigneswaran 30 June 2013 Word Count: 9567 (excluding references) University of Amsterdam Table of Contents 1. Introduction 3 2. Literature Review 6 Causes of gentrification 7 Definition 7 Forms of gentrification 7 Aims of state-led gentrification 8 Resistance 9 Three Waves 9 Neutralization of resistance 10 Contemporary resistance to gentrification 11 3. Methodology 15 Case 15 In-depth interviews 16 Policy documents 17 Media 18 Triangulation 18 4. Urban policy in the Netherlands 19 Privatization 19 Stadsvisie 2030 21 5. Resistance in Rotterdam 22 Nieuw Crooswijk 22 Vreewijk 25 6. Conclusion 29 Bibliography 31 2 1. Introduction Gentrification has become the preferred urban policy instrument of choice for states all over the world. Public-private partnerships of city governments and property developers actively intervene in neighborhoods in order to change its socio-economic profile. The make-up of the neighborhoods changes, replacing the penniless by the more fortunate. From a sporadic process restricted to the city-center of a few cities, it has spread both vertically and laterally. It is no longer exclusively found in central urban areas, but also in peripheral neighborhoods. Occurrences are not limited to the large cities of the Anglo- sphere, the phenomenon can now also be found in Rio de Janeiro or in Rotterdam (Smith, 2002: 439). In Rotterdam, 'urban restructuring' is on the forefront of the policy agenda. The municipal city government and housing associations seduce private developers to invest in owner-occupied housing disadvantaged neighborhoods. Public policy is used to spur gentri- fication of disadvantaged neighborhoods. In contrast to the generalization of gentrification stands the absence of contestation. Never have sounds of opposition been as silent as in this phase. Despite the rigorous social consequences for which the process is known, of which displacement and loss of community are most infamous, open contestation is completely muted in some places, but less so in others (Slater, 2008: 220). The contrast with the seventies and eighties, when gentrification often caused citywide protests is stark (Smith, 2002: 442). The absence of overt contestation sparks a few questions on gentrification. How do gov- ernments actually use gentrification as a policy instrument? How do people resist gentrifica- tion and what strategies do they use? Answering these questions contributes to a better understanding of the consequences of gentrification, how the process plays out in a local context and gives perspective on the role of agency in resistance. Whereas much attention has been devoted to the causes of gentrification, its consequences remain under researched. According to Tom Slater this is part of the "eviction of critical per- spectives in gentrification research". He asserts that gentrification has been sugarcoated in public and policy discourse. "It no longer evokes thoughts of rent increases, landlord har- assment and working-class displacement, yet currently is more associated with lattes, art 3 galleries and hip bars” (Slater, 2006: 739). Lance Freeman attacked Slater for his critical stance, asserting that ‘positive gentrification’ exists (Freeman, 2008). Slater accused him of being an apologist: "The suggestion that there can be ‘positive gentrification’ fails to appre- ciate that ‘gentrification’ was designed to capture and challenge the neighborhood expres- sion of class inequality." and "Of course gentrification can be positive — for gentrifiers, city managers and particularly the owners of capital". Further adding that social scientists are too busy preoccupied with making research ‘policy relevant’. This is on its own not prob- lematic, but a situation where “research funds tends to flow to researchers who convincing- ly propose that the ‘evidence’ will be ‘relevant’ to a mysterious group of ‘end users’” is (2008: 219). In other words, states rarely consult social science unless it supports the poli- cies they want to pursue. As a consequence, gentrification research has become largely one-sided and a legitimation of ‘neoliberal urbanism’. Have Lance Freeman and his associ- ates really sold their souls to the devil? It is possible that critical perspectives have dwindled as gentrification plays out more peacefully. Likewise it is possible that critical perspectives have dwindled because it has been harder to contest gentrification in general. In his article in 2002 Neil Smith was the first to bring gentrification out of its local level and showed that it is tied to processes at the global scale such as globalization, neolib- eralization of welfare states and the unprecedented movement of financial capital. His ab- stract theory is most at home explaining gentrification in very broad terms. At the same time, he mentions that “gentrification has occurred in markedly different ways in different neighborhoods and according to different temporal rhythms”, specifying the need for a more contextual understanding of the process (Smith, 2002: 440). The danger of course, is that it becomes all about specifying local variations of the same story. (Van Gent, 2013: 504- 505). This thesis contributes by bringing Smith’s abstract theory to a more contextual level. Existing explanations on gentrification research tend to view residents in a passive sense. This is possibly the outcome of structural viewpoints that tend to downplay agency. Residents are seen as passive subjects to the decisions imposed upon them by states & property developers. Not much is known how residents may actually actively resist gentrifi- cation. An exception is the article by Newman and Wyly (2006), which looks at individual and household strategies for resisting displacement in New York City. The problem is that they primarily look at market-induced gentrification in the United States. 4 In this bachelor thesis I investigate restructuring policy in Rotterdam, where the local munic- ipal government, housing associations and property developers actively pursue an agenda of gentrification. Rotterdam prides itself on being the ‘Manhattan on the Maas’. A reputation that it thoroughly deserves in terms of harsh neoliberal politics. If one Dutch city would be successful in quashing resistance to gentrification, it would probably be Rotterdam. Never- theless a lot of resistance to restructuring emerged in Vreewijk & Crooswijk. Using a combi- nation of in-depth interviews, policy documents and media sources, this thesis investigates how contemporary gentrification, manifested through restructuring policy, sparks resistance and how this plays out in the case of Rotterdam. Ultimately this thesis responds to Tom Slater’s call: “If we are to restore a critical agenda, it would seem of paramount importance to study how and at what spatial scales people fight for their right to place, or their right to be re-placed" (Slater, 2006: 220). This thesis is structured as follows: in chapter 2 I give an overview of the rich literature on gentrification and sparse work on resistance to gentrification, concluding with expectations I derived from the both strands of literature. In chapter 3 I assert why Rotterdam is an opti- mal case for this research, I also line out the rationales for the methods of data collection I have used. In chapter 4 I draw from policy documents and newspapers to chart the devel- opment of Dutch urban policy, showing a trend of neo-liberalization. I use a historical mac- ro-to-micro approach, starting with a broad historical picture before moving on to Rotter- dam in recent years. In chapter 5 I closely investigate restructuring & resistance in Vreewijk & Crooswijk, using a combination of interviews and media sources. Finally I sum up my main findings in chapter 6, and point out avenues for future research. 5 2. Literature Review It is an understatement to state that there is a substantial amount of literature on gentrifi- cation (Van Gent, 2013: 503). Since its conception in the sixties, it has evolved into one of the most popular topics of urban inquiry. Furthermore, the concept has received wide- spread attention from journalists, policy-makers and politicians and is firmly rooted in con- temporary public discourse (Lees, Slater, Wyly, 2010: xvi). This chapter is divided in three parts. In the first part I look at the theoretical debate on gentrification. The debate long focused at the causes of gentrification. With the generali- zation of gentrification, the role of the state became more prominent. As a policy instru- ment gentrification serves various purposes. In the second part I look at resistance to gentri- fication. I give an account of its historical development, look at why people choose to mobi- lize and also what strategies residents use. In the third part I sum up the expectations from the literature. Causes of gentrification Much of early research was devoted to the root causes of gentrification. Scholars squabbled over the question whether the process is caused by living preferences - consumption-side explanations - or the flow of capital - production-side explanations. Production-side theories see gentrification as the outcome of the movement of capi- tal. An influential production-side theorist is Neil Smith. Trying to understand the puzzling back-to-the-city movement of capital, he developed the rent gap thesis. Central to which is "the disparity between the potential ground rent level and the actual ground rent capital- ized under the present land use" (Smith, 1979: 545). The actual rent gap itself is created through the devalorisation of land, created by disinvestment. The flow of capital to the place of highest return closes the gap. Gentrification is a back to-the-city movement of capi- tal. Demand-side explanations see gentrification as the outcome of changes in occupational structures and human cultural preferences. A class has emerged that has a disposition to- wards living in the inner-city. Gentrification is a back-to-the-city movement of people (Lees, Slater, Wyly: 2010: 67). Over the decades, much of the debate’s intensity has worn out.
Recommended publications
  • Aanvraagformulier Subsidie Dit Formulier Dient Volledig Ingevuld Te Worden Geüpload Bij Uw Aanvraag
    Over dit formulier Aanvraagformulier subsidie Dit formulier dient volledig ingevuld te worden geüpload bij uw aanvraag. Brede regeling combinatiefuncties Rotterdam - Cultuur Privacy De gemeente gaat zorgvuldig om met uw gegevens. Meer leest u hierover op Rotterdam.nl/privacy. Contact Voor meer informatie: Anne-Rienke Hendrikse [email protected] Voordat u dit formulier gaat invullen, wordt u vriendelijk verzocht de Brede regeling combinatiefuncties Rotterdam – cultuur zorgvuldig te lezen. Heeft u te weinig ruimte om uw plan te beschrijven? dan kunt u dit als extra bijlage uploaden tijdens het indienen van uw aanvraag. 1. Gegevens aanvrager Naam organisatie Contactpersoon Adres Postcode (1234AB) Plaats Telefoonnummer (10 cijfers) Mobiel telefoonnummer (10 cijfers) E-mailadres ([email protected]) Website (www.voorbeeld.nl) IBAN-nummer Graag de juiste tenaamstelling Ten name van van uw IBAN-nummer gebruiken 129 MO 08 19 blad 1/10 2. Subsidiegegevens aanvrager Bedragen invullen in euro’s Gemeentelijke subsidie in het kader van het Cultuurplan 2021-2024 per jaar Structurele subsidie van de rijksoverheid (OCW, NFPK en/of het Fonds voor Cultuurparticipatie) in het kader van het Cultuurplan 2021-2024 per jaar 3. Gegevens school Naam school Contactpersoon Adres Postcode (1234AB) Plaats Telefoonnummer (10 cijfers) Fax (10 cijfers) Rechtsvorm Stichting Vereniging Overheid Anders, namelijk BRIN-nummer 4. Overige gegevens school a. Heeft de school een subsidieaanvraag gedaan bij de gemeente Rotterdam in het kader van de Subsidieregeling Rotterdams Onderwijsbeleid 2021-2022, voor Dagprogrammering in de Childrens Zone? Ja Nee b. In welke wijk is de school gelegen? Vul de bijlage in achteraan dit formulier. 5. Gegevens samenwerking a. Wie treedt formeel op als werkgever? b.
    [Show full text]
  • Meerpaal 02Oost
    meerpaal 02Oost voor huurders van Havensteder nr 02 / april 2012 2 3 met Oost hebben we goud in inhoud handen: hier komt de zon op! 03 | voorwoord | Eindelijk was het dan zover. Op 1 januari 2012 startte Oost Havensteder officieel met het gebiedsgerichte werken. Hoewel 04 | introductie wijkteams we ons kantoor aan de Fluiterlaan nog verbouwen, kunt u 05 | Capelle Zuid gewoon bij ons terecht. | 06 | Capelle Noord 07 | Prins Alexander Wij richten de organisatie in met wijkteams. liggen dan wij willen. Nu we in iets rustiger vaarwater 08 | sancties in de Rondelen Medewerkers die in dezelfde wijk werken zitten nu bij komen, gaan we de kwaliteit van onze dienstverlening elkaar in één team. De wijkteams zorgen voor onder- dit jaar echt verbeteren. En de wijkgerichte aanpak helpt 10 | Uiverstraat houd, verhuur en prettig wonen. Iedere medewerker is daarbij. 12 | 4 Hoge Era’s op die manier betrokken bij wat er speelt in de wijk. Ze kunnen zo beter samenwerken en sneller handelen. Samen met de deelgemeente Prins Alexander en de 14 | wijkwinkels gemeente Capelle aan den IJssel gaan we hier in Oost Zelf ben ik heilig overtuigd van de voordelen van het de uitdaging aan om regiobreed te denken. Door onze gebiedsgericht werken. Uiteindelijk levert het u en ons krachten te bundelen en niet in hokjes en gemeente- Havensteder nieuws veel op, maar zo’n ingrijpende verandering kost een grenzen te denken. hoop tijd en energie. Daardoor zijn we helaas niet altijd 15 | column Hedy goed bereikbaar en blijven uw klachten soms langer In de vorige Meerpaal maakte u al kennis met het 17 | nieuwe folderlijn Managementteam Oost.
    [Show full text]
  • Vrije Universiteit Some Years of Communities That Care
    VRIJE UNIVERSITEIT SOME YEARS OF COMMUNITIES THAT CARE Learning from a social experiment ACADEMISCH PROEFSCHRIFT ter verkrijging van de graad Doctor aan de Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, op gezag van de rector magnificus prof.dr. L.M. Bouter, in het openbaar te verdedigen ten overstaan van de promotiecommissie van de Faculteit der Psychologie en Pedagogiek op woensdag 19 december 2012 om 11.45 uur in de aula van de universiteit, De Boelelaan 1105 door Hermannus Bernardus Jonkman geboren te Hengelo (O) promotoren: prof.dr. W.J.M.J. Cuijpers prof.dr. J.C.J. Boutellier SOME YEARS OF COMMUNITIES THAT LearningCARE from a social experiment Harrie Jonkman This study was financially supported by research grant (3190009) from the Dutch ZonMW and a two month exchange visitor grant from NIDA (US, program code P100168). Seattle/Amsterdam, 2012 VRIJE UNIVERSITEIT SOME YEARS OF COMMUNITIES THAT CARE Learning from a social experiment ACADEMISCH PROEFSCHRIFT ter verkrijging van de graad Doctor aan de Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, op gezag van de rector magnificus prof.dr. L.M. Bouter, in het openbaar te verdedigen ten overstaan van de promotiecommissie van de Faculteit der Psychologie en Pedagogiek op woensdag 19 december 2012 om 11.45 uur in de aula van de universiteit, De Boelelaan 1105 door Hermannus Bernardus Jonkman geboren te Hengelo (O) promotoren: prof.dr. W.J.M.J. Cuijpers prof.dr. J.C.J. Boutellier Leescommissie: Prof. dr. A.T.F. Beekman Prof. dr. C.M.H. Hosman Prof. dr. J.J.C.M. Hox Prof. dr. J.M. Koot Prof. dr. T.V.M. Pels Prof.
    [Show full text]
  • Over Rotterdammers En Hun Straat Nummer 14 • Januari 2021 •Nummer Januari 14
    Over Rotterdammers en hun straat Nummer 14 • januari 2021 •Nummer 14 januari Opzoomertekenaar Leo de Veld De lockdown in mijn straat Uitbetaalpunten onmisbare schakel 2 3 Opzoomertekenaar Leo de Veld Ten geleide Niet te stuiten eo de Veld is altijd aan het tekenen. Als peuter klom Opzoomeren, dat is toch af en toe zorgen dat het een vrolijke boel is in je straat? Twee hij al voor dag en dauw uit L buurmannen die beginnen met het ophangen zijn bed om meteen naar zijn setje van slingers en vlaggen aan de gevels. Een kleurpotloden te grijpen. Stilletjes buurjongen die zijn dj-set op zijn stoepje zet en sloop hij dan naar zijn bureau bij een gezellig muziekje draait. Openzwaaiende deuren waaruit bewoners een voor een het raam met uitzicht op de Jan zelfgemaakte hapjes naar mooi gedekte Porcellistraat. Met zijn vingertjes tafels brengen in een autovrije straat. Vrolijk trok hij het rolgordijn ietsje omhoog lachende kinderen die zich vermaken met het speelgoed uit het Opzoomerkeetje. voor wat licht en ging vervolgens aan de slag. ‘Een tekening is goed als Kopje suiker je er het plezier van de tekenaar in Jaar in jaar uit organiseren honderden Rotterdamse straten een of meer terugziet.’ straatactiviteiten. Bijvoorbeeld een straatfeest, zoals in bovenstaand voorbeeld. Een mooie Knuffelende huisjes voor je buren in december’. ‘En? En? Hangen ze al? Zien ze er manier om elkaar als buren weer eens te Met datzelfde plezier is hij inmiddels al vijftien jaar de vaste goed uit?’, vraagt hij meteen. ‘Het is gek. Meestal duurt het ontmoeten en beter te leren kennen.
    [Show full text]
  • Cities and the “Multicultural State”: Immigration, Multi
    CITIES AND THE “MULTICULTURAL STATE”: IMMIGRATION, MULTI- ETHNIC NEIGHBORHOODS, AND THE SOCIO-SPATIAL NEGOTIATION OF POLICY IN THE NETHERLANDS DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fullfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Annemarie Bodaar, M.A. * * * * * The Ohio State University 2008 Dissertation Committee: Dr. Mei-Po Kwan, Advisor Approved by: Dr. Eugene J. McCann Dr. Nancy Ettlinger _____________ Dr. Galey Modan Advisor Graduate Program in Geography Copyright by Annemarie Bodaar 2008 ABSTRACT Immigration is widely acknowledged to be a major social issue in Western European countries. In this context, the Netherlands was one of the few countries to commit itself to the ideal of a ‗multicultural state‘. While this policy ideal was intended to maintain the coherence of the increasingly multi-ethnic state, alleviate growing fear and suspicion of immigrants among sections of Dutch society, and overcome growing ethnic segregation in major cities, its implementation has produced a number of contradictions, however. There has been both a massive political shift in favor of anti- immigrant parties, and increases in segregation in the big cities. In this context the Nethelands has recently reconsidered its multicultural programs. While assimilation is gaining ground as the dominant discourse of immigrant integration in a number of liberal states, the Netherlands has experienced the most profound change away from multiculturalism. Dutch cities therefore could be considered laboratories for the analysis of changes in the way state actors and residents across the world are negotiating immigrant incorporation. This dissertation explores how policies aimed at immigrant integration developed, were implemented and how they were negotiated when implemented in specific multi- ethnic neighborhoods and its effects for neighborhoods, cities and the nation.
    [Show full text]
  • Social Cohesion and Belonging Predict the Well-Being of Community-Dwelling Older People Jane M Cramm* and Anna P Nieboer
    Cramm and Nieboer BMC Geriatrics (2015) 15:30 DOI 10.1186/s12877-015-0027-y RESEARCH ARTICLE Open Access Social cohesion and belonging predict the well-being of community-dwelling older people Jane M Cramm* and Anna P Nieboer Abstract Background: The neighborhood social environment has been identified as an important aspect of older people’s well-being. Poor neighborhood conditions can pose difficulties in obtaining support, especially for older people who live alone. Although social environments have been found to be related to well-being among older people, the longitudinal relationship between the social environment and well-being remains poorly undestood. Research on the effects of changes in neighborhood characteristics, such as social cohesion and social belonging, on well-being is lacking. Therefore, the study aims are (i) describe social cohesion, social belonging, and instrumental goals to achieve well-being among community-dwelling older people, (ii) determine whether these factors varied according to neighborhood social deprivation and compare these findings to those from chronically ill/previously hospitalized older people, and (iii) identify longitudinal relationships between social cohesion and belonging and well-being. Methods: Independently living Dutch older adults (aged ≥ 70 years) were asked to complete questionnaires in 2011 (T0) and 2013 (T1). Response rates at T0 and T1 were 66% (945/1440) and 62% (588/945), respectively. Descriptive statistics, paired sample t-tests, analysis of variance, univariate analyses and multilevel regression analyses controlling for background characteristics and baseline well-being were performed. Results: Of 945 respondents [43% male; mean age, 77.5 ± 5.8 (range, 70–101) years], 34.7% were married and 83.3% were Dutch natives.
    [Show full text]
  • The Tradition of Making Polder Citiesfransje HOOIMEIJER
    The Tradition of Making Polder CitiesFRANSJE HOOIMEIJER Proefschrift ter verkrijging van de graad van doctor aan de Technische Universiteit Delft, op gezag van de Rector Magnificus prof. ir. K.C.A.M. Luyben, voorzitter van het College voor Promoties, in het openbaar te verdedigen op dinsdag 18 oktober 2011 om 12.30 uur door Fernande Lucretia HOOIMEIJER doctorandus in kunst- en cultuurwetenschappen geboren te Capelle aan den IJssel Dit proefschrift is goedgekeurd door de promotor: Prof. dr. ir. V.J. Meyer Copromotor: dr. ir. F.H.M. van de Ven Samenstelling promotiecommissie: Rector Magnificus, voorzitter Prof. dr. ir. V.J. Meyer, Technische Universiteit Delft, promotor dr. ir. F.H.M. van de Ven, Technische Universiteit Delft, copromotor Prof. ir. D.F. Sijmons, Technische Universiteit Delft Prof. ir. H.C. Bekkering, Technische Universiteit Delft Prof. dr. P.J.E.M. van Dam, Vrije Universiteit van Amsterdam Prof. dr. ir.-arch. P. Uyttenhove, Universiteit Gent, België Prof. dr. P. Viganò, Università IUAV di Venezia, Italië dr. ir. G.D. Geldof, Danish University of Technology, Denemarken For Juri, August*, Otis & Grietje-Nel 1 Inner City - Chapter 2 2 Waterstad - Chapter 3 3 Waterproject - Chapter 4 4 Blijdorp - Chapter 5a 5 Lage Land - Chapter 5b 6 Ommoord - Chapter 5b 7 Zevenkamp - Chapter 5c 8 Prinsenland - Chapter 5c 9 Nesselande - Chapter 6 10 Zestienhoven - Chapter 6 Content Chapter 1: Polder Cities 5 Introduction 5 Problem Statement, Hypothesis and Method 9 Technological Development as Natural Order 10 Building-Site Preparation 16 Rotterdam
    [Show full text]
  • Herprofileer Oud-Charlois Het Verhogen Van Sociale Controle En Het Ongedaan Maken Van Ongewenste Anonimiteit in Oud-Charlois
    TU DELFT Herprofileer Oud-Charlois Het verhogen van sociale controle en het ongedaan maken van ongewenste anonimiteit in Oud-Charlois Naam: Charlotte Cammelbeeck E-mail: [email protected] Studentnr: 1302566 Docenten: Remon Rooij + Fokke Wind Datum: 30-10-2009 2 Voorwoord Oud Charlois is een zogenaamde Vogelaarwijk. De 40 wijken van Vogelaar betreft een lijst van 40 Nederlandse probleemwijken die op 22 maart 2007 door Minister Ella Vogelaar van Wonen, Wijken en Integratie bekend zijn gemaakt. De minister duidde deze wijken aan met 'krachtwijken'. Oud Charlois in een van deze wijken (VROM, 2009). Sinds een aantal jaren wordt er vanuit de gemeente van alles ondernomen om de problemen aan te pakken. Maar de aanpak vanuit Rotterdam is vooralsnog te sectoraal en weinig effectief. Daarom is de Veldacademie in het leven geroepen. Samen met de TU Delft en de gemeente inventariseert, visualiseert en stimuleert Veldacademie Oud-Charlois(Veldacademie, 2008). Vanuit de TU Delft ben ik samen met andere studenten in september van dit jaar begonnen met onderzoek en daar is dit verslag een resultaat van. Dit onderzoek was nooit gelukt zonder de hulp van Fokke Wind, Remon Rooij en de mensen van de Veldacademie en daarvoor wil ik ze bij deze bedanken. 3 Inhoudsopgave 1 Inleiding blz. 5 1.1 Aanleidingen voor het onderzoek blz. 5 1.2 Doelstelling blz. 7 1.3 Onderzoeksvragen en –benadering blz. 7 2 Onderzoek blz. 8 2.1 De relatie tussen sociale controle/anonimiteit en overlast blz. 8 2.2 Ontwerpaanbevelingen voor de straat blz. 9 2.2.1. De relatie van de woning met de omgeving blz.
    [Show full text]
  • Residents Experience the Effects of Gentrification in Middelland and Katendrecht
    [I] “You cannot live with the present, if you forget the past” An insight on how ‘in between’ residents experience the effects of gentrification in Middelland and Katendrecht Bachelor thesis Geography, Planning & Environment Marijke Clarisse S4394682 Mentor: Ritske Dankert Radboud University Nijmegen Faculty of Management August 2016 [II] Preface To Complete my third year and thus the baChelor SoCial Geography, Spatial Planning and Environment at the Radboud University of Nijmegen, I have been working on my bachelor thesis for the last semester. The researCh I did was on the experienCes of gentrifiCation in Rotterdam for residents that are not taken into aCCount in the theories and how the positive governmental poliCy on gentrifiCation Could influenCe this: First of all I would like to thanks my mentor Ritske Dankert who guided me through the proCess of writing this thesis in the many feedbaCk sessions. I also would like to thank the people who took the time and effort to help me by providing me with the information needed through interviews. And all people who helped me through the past three years and especially the last few months: thank you! Marijke Clarisse Nijmegen, 12 augustus [III] Summary GentrifiCation has reCeived a lot of attention in the last Couple of years. Not only the United States of AmeriCa or the United Kingdom are dealing with gentrifiCation, the phenomenon has reaChed the Netherlands as well. In the Netherlands gentrifiCation is used by the government as a strategy for solving the problem of segregation in Certain neighbourhoods, whiCh makes those neighbourhoods less liveable. If the government wants to keep using gentrifiCation as a way to revitalise disadvantaged neighbourhoods in the City, it will have to find a way to meet the needs of both the middle class newcomers to the area, as well as the indigenous residents that want to keep living there.
    [Show full text]
  • Gebiedsverslag Agniesebuurt 2019
    Onderwerp: Aanbiedingsbrief jaarverslag 2019 wijkraad Agniesebuurt Gebied Noord Bezoekadres: Eudokiaplein 35 3037 BT ROTTERDAM Postadres: Postbus 70012 Retouradres: Postbus 70012 3000 KP Rotterdam 3000 KP Rotterdam Internet: http://www.rotterdam.nl/noord College van burgemeester en wethouders Van: Wijkraad Agniesebuurt Postbus 70012 Telefoon: 010 - 267 2123 E-mail: [email protected] 3000 KP ROTTERDAM 3000KP Ons kenmerk: BSD-GbNo-3544290 ] Bijlage(n): 1 Datum: 3 maart 2020 3544290 Geacht college, Namens de wijkraad Agniesebuurt bieden wij u het jaarverslag 2019 aan. Het voorliggende jaarverslag is door de wijkraad Agniesebuurt in concept vastgesteld en wordt in de openbare vergadering van 9 maart a.s. formeel bekrachtigd. Met vriendelijke groet, Okach Bouchtaoui Marvin Biljoen Wijkmanager Agniesebuurt Technisch voorzitter Bijlage: Jaarverslag 2019 wijkraad Agniesebuurt Gebiedsverslag Agniesebuurt 2019 1 Inhoud gebiedsverslag Voor u ligt het gebiedsverslag 2019 van de wijkraad Agniesebuurt. Het verslag begint met een voorwoord door de technisch voorzitter Marvin Biljoen, die een terugblik verwoord namens de gehele wijkraad Agniesebuurt. Het eerste hoofdstuk beschrijft de communicatie van de wijkraad met en de participatie van bewoners, maatschappelijke organisaties en ondernemers. Dit heeft betrekking op de voorbereiding, vaststelling en uitvoering van het gemeentelijk beleid in de Agniesebuurt op verschillende terreinen. Hoofstuk twee gaat over de beschikbare middelen voor bewonersinitiatieven en participatie in 2019, met een terugblik naar 2018 en een vooruitblik naar 2020. Hoofdstuk drie geeft een beeld van de adviezen die in 2019 gegeven zijn aan het gemeentebestuur. Tot slot is in hoofdstuk vier op overzichtelijke wijze puntsgewijs de voortgang van de doelen uit de wijkagenda beschreven. In een bijlage treft u een overzicht aan van de toegekende subsidieaanvragen voor bewonersinitiatieven in 2019.
    [Show full text]
  • National Report – Netherlands
    The Impacts of Restrictions and Entitlements on the Integration of Family Migrants National Report Netherlands Han Entzinger Caroline Ivanescu Peter Scholten Semin Suvarierol Erasmus University, Rotterdam October 2013 THE IMPACT OF RESTRICTIONS AND ENTITLEMENTS ON THE INTEGRATION OF FAMILY MIGRANTS IMPACIM Country Report: The Netherlands Prof. Dr. Han Entzinger: [email protected] Carolina Ivanescu, MSc: [email protected] Dr. Peter Scholten: [email protected] Dr. Semin Suvarierol: [email protected] Erasmus University Rotterdam Project website: www.compas.ox.ac.uk/research/welfare/impacim A report prepared as part of the IMPACIM project. With financial support from the European Commission ii Table of Contents Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................. 1 1. INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................... 3 1.1 Aims of the project ...................................................................................................................... 3 1.2 Research methodology and data ........................................................................................... 4 2. FAMILY MIGRANTS IN THE DUTCH POLICY CONTEXT ..................................... 7 2.1 Who are the family migrants in the Netherlands? ........................................................... 7 2.2 The problematisation of family migration .......................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Peter Scholten · Maurice Crul Paul Van De Laar Editors the Case Of
    IMISCOE Research Series Peter Scholten · Maurice Crul Paul van de Laar Editors Coming to Terms with Superdiversity The Case of Rotterdam IMISCOE Research Series This series is the official book series of IMISCOE, the largest network of excellence on migration and diversity in the world. It comprises publications which present empirical and theoretical research on different aspects of international migration. The authors are all specialists, and the publications a rich source of information for researchers and others involved in international migration studies. The series is published under the editorial supervision of the IMISCOE Editorial Committee which includes leading scholars from all over Europe. The series, which contains more than eighty titles already, is internationally peer reviewed which ensures that the book published in this series continue to present excellent academic standards and scholarly quality. Most of the books are available open access. For information on how to submit a book proposal, please visit: http://www. imiscoe.org/publications/how-to-submit-a-book-proposal. More information about this series at http://www.springer.com/series/13502 Peter Scholten • Maurice Crul • Paul van de Laar Editors Coming to Terms with Superdiversity The Case of Rotterdam Editors Peter Scholten Maurice Crul Erasmus University Rotterdam Free University Amsterdam Rotterdam, The Netherlands Amsterdam, The Netherlands Paul van de Laar Erasmus School of History Culture and Communication Rotterdam, The Netherlands ISSN 2364-4087 ISSN 2364-4095 (electronic) IMISCOE Research Series ISBN 978-3-319-96040-1 ISBN 978-3-319-96041-8 (eBook) https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96041-8 Library of Congress Control Number: 2018961416 © The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2019.
    [Show full text]