DOCSLIB.ORG

Paris – Hamburg IBA Dock, Mai 27, 2010

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Paris – Hamburg IBA Dock, Mai 27, 2010 Ateliers europeens grands projets urbains – Session 3 Métropoles en projets, laboratoires d’urbanité Atelier : Städtebauliche Projekte in Europa – 3. Session Metropolen im Umbau, städtebauliche Labore Paris – Hamburg IBA Dock, Mai 27, 2010 Paul Lecroart & Jean-Pierre Palisse IAU ÎdF Urban Planning and Development Agency of the Paris Region Paris Ile-de-France: questions for the future of the metropolis 1 We are very happy to be here : thank you! Paris Ile-de-France: questions for the future of the metropolis 2 European Workshops on Large urban projects Unformal exchange Decision-makers & professionals Mirror-cities and mirror-sites Ideas and implementation Cross-breading Paris Ile-de-France: questions for the future of the metropolis 3 Paris and Ile-de-France region Region -12,000 sq. km (20% built-up) - 11,7 million inhabitants -8 départements, 1,281 municipalities Paris City - 100 sq. km - 2.1 million inhabitants Agglomeration (urban area) - 2700 sq. km - 9.6 million inhabitants - 400 municipalities Paris Ile-de-France: questions for the future of the metropolis 4 Paris city to Paris region, a long story Paris Ile-de-France: questions for the future of the metropolis 5 Our « Kurt Shumacher plan » : 1965 Masterplan Planning extensive growth Paris Ile-de-France: questions for the future of the metropolis 6 Paris [metropole] today : rebuilding the city on the city Paris Ile-de-France: questions for the future of the metropolis 7 Rebuilding the city on the city : new drivers Paris Ile-de-France: questions for the future of the metropolis 8 Rebuilding the city on the city : new drivers Cultural change (Nantes) Paris Ile-de-France: questions for the future of the metropolis 9 Paris [metropole] today : diversity (an asset) Paris Ile-de-France: questions for the future of the metropolis 10 Paris [metropole] – Hamburg : issues in common International position World-city? European gateway & hub? Paris Ile-de-France: questions for the future of the metropolis 11 Paris [metropole] – Hamburg : issues in common Sustainable growth? - environnemental footprint - ressources - climate change Paris Ile-de-France: questions for the future of the metropolis 12 Paris [metropole] – Hamburg : issues in common Social and spatial fragmentation Paris Ile-de-France: questions for the future of the metropolis 13 Paris [metropole] – Hamburg : issues in common Social and spatial fragmentation. A solution : wealth everywhere? Paris Ile-de-France: questions for the future of the metropolis 14 Paris [metropole] – Hamburg : issues in common Cultural gap : « Cosmopolis » issues! • Equal opportunities • Social mix and integration • territorial attractiveness Paris Ile-de-France: questions for the future of the metropolis 15 Paris [metropole] – Hamburg : issues in common Gaps in the urban fabric : « Metrozones » issues too! • Infrastructure barriers, monofonctional uses • « Un-urban » forms of (new) development Paris Ile-de-France: questions for the future of the metropolis 16 Paris [metropole] – Hamburg : issues in common Livibility - housing for all : needs = 60000 HU/year - adequate jobs : economic changes, education - mobility : ring metro, trams… - leisure & nature Paris Ile-de-France: questions for the future of the metropolis 17 Paris [metropole] – NOT Hamburg : Governance Institutional Infra-regional cooperation Paris Ile-de-France: questions for the future of the metropolis 18 Paris [metropole] – NOT Hamburg : Governance Project oriented Paris Ile-de-France: questions for the future of the metropolis 19 Paris [metropole] – NOT Hamburg : Governance Consistency Internal competition Priorities Paris Ile-de-France: questions for the future of the metropolis 20 Paris [metropole] – NOT Hamburg : Governance Public debate Participation Paris Ile-de-France: questions for the future of the metropolis 21 Metropolitan visions: debate & conflicts Paris Ile-de-France: questions for the future of the metropolis 22 Metropolitan visions: debate & conflicts Regional Master Plan (adopted Sept. 2008) Grand Pari(s) International Metropolitan Design Consultation (final April 2009) Central Government strategy for Grand Paris Grand Paris Law voted in parliament (may 2010) Paris Ile-de-France: questions for the future of the metropolis 23 Metropolitan visions: debate & conflicts Regional Master Plan (2008) Challenges -climate change -Social sustainability -International position Vision: Compact city-region Inclusive « ecoregion » Moderate growth Paris Ile-de-France: questions for the future of the metropolis 24 Metropolitan visions: debate & conflicts A double outer ring metro linking economic clusters Paris Ile-de-France: questions for the future of the metropolis 25 Metropolitan visions: debate & conflicts Grand Pari(s) International Metropolitan Design Consultation What could be the « post-Kyoto » metropolis? And the « Grand Paris »? 12 months, 10 teams w/ leading architect –big media coverage Paris Ile-de-France: questions for the future of the metropolis 26 Metropolitan visions: debate & conflicts Grand Pari(s) International Metropolitan Design Consultation Stimulating process Identifiing potentials Paris Ile-de-France: questions for the future of the metropolis 27 Metropolitan visions: debate & conflicts Grand Pari(s) International Metropolitan Design Consultation Production of ideas, concepts, images… (some seen before) April 2009 Grand Pari(s) Consultation [Portzamparc arch.] Paris Ile-de-France: questions for the future of the metropolisApril 1963, Paris-Match Magazine 28 Paris Metropole organisation : a new approach Volontary co- operation Cross-border Vision building through action Paris Ile-de-France: questions for the future of the metropolis 29 Paris Metropole 4 working groups 1. Housing 2. Mobility 3. Solidarity & sustainability 4. Metropolitan Projects • Initiative Paris Metropole : Call for ideas and projects inspired by IBAs • Phase 1 (2010-2012) • Spatial and non spatial, multi-dimensionnal projects • tackling metropolitan issues • innovative, experimental projects Paris Ile-de-France: questions for the future of the metropolis 30 Understanding IBA Hamburg IBA process -Bottom up/top down : project selection & qualification, public involment -Who does what? Decision-making process, coordination, implementation stages -IBA Instruments : convention, IBA Labs, etc. Learning from the IBA - First assessment (multi-scale) - What happens after the IBA? Paris Ile-de-France: questions for the future of the metropolis 31 Mirror-site Elbe Insel : Seine Amont-Créteil 90 km² Paris 450,000 inhabitants 13 cities Strategic Créteil regeneration area Seine Amont Paris Ile-de-France: questions for the future of the metropolis 32 Mirror-site Elbe Insel : Seine Amont-Créteil Paris Ile-de-France: questions for the future of the metropolis 33.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Why Paris Region Is the #1 Destination on the Planet: with 50 Million Visitors Each Year, the Area Is Synonymous with “Art De Vivre”, Culture, Gastronomy and History
    Saint-Denis Basilicum and Maison de la Légion d’Honneur © Plaine Commune, Direction du Développement Economique, SEPE, Som VOSAVANH-DEPLAGNE - Plain of Montesson © CSAGBS-EDesaux - La Défense Business district © 11h45 for Defacto - Campus © Ecole Polytechnique Paris/Saclay. J. Barande - © Ville d’Enghien-les-Bains - INSEAD Fontainebleau © Yann Piriou - Charenton-le-Pont – Ivry-sur-Seine © ParisEstMarne&Bois - Bassin de La Villette, Paris Plages © CRT Ile-de-France - Tripelon-Jarry Welcome to Paris Region Paris Region Facts and Figures 2020 lays out a panorama of the region’s economic dynamism and social life, Europe’s business positioning it among the leading regions in Europe and worldwide. & innovation With its fundamental key indicators, the brochure “Paris Region Facts and powerhouse Figures 2020” is a tool for decision and action for companies and economic stakeholders. It is useful to economic and political leaders of the region and to all those who want to have a global vision of this dynamic regional economy. Paris Region Facts and Figures 2020 is a collaborative publication produced by Choose Paris Region, L’Institut Paris Region and the Paris Île-de-France Regional Chamber of Commerce and Industry. Jardin_des_tuileries_Tour_Eiffel_01_tvb CRT IDF-Van Biesen Table of contents 5 Welcome to Paris Region 27 Digital Infrastructure 6 Overview 28 Real Estate 10 Population 30 Transport and Mobility 12 Economy and Business 32 Logistics 18 Employment 34 Meetings and Exhibitions 20 Education 36 Tourism and Quality of life 24 R&D and Innovation Paris Region Facts & Figures 2020 Welcome to Paris Region 5 A dynamic and A business fast-growing region and innovation powerhouse Paris Region, The Paris Region is a truly global region which accounts for 23.3% The highest GDP in the European of France’s workforce, 31% of Union (EU28) in billions of euros.
    [Show full text]
  • Paris Region Facts & Figures 2021
    Paris Region Facts & Figures 2021 Welcome to Paris Region Europe’s Leading Business and Innovation Powerhouse Paris Region Facts and Figures 2021 lays out a panorama of the Region’s economic dynamism and social life, positioning it among the leading regions in Europe and worldwide. Despite the global pandemic, the figures presented in this publication do not yet measure the impact of the health crisis, as the data reflects the reality of the previous months or year.* With its fundamental key indicators, the brochure, “Paris Region Facts and Figures 2021,” is a tool for decision and action for companies and economic stakeholders. It is useful to economic and political leaders of the Region and to all who wish to have a global vision of this dynamic regional economy. Paris Region Facts and Figures 2021 is a collaborative publication produced by Choose Paris Region, L’Institut Paris Region, and the Paris Île-de-France Regional Chamber of Commerce and Industry. *L’Institut Paris Region has produced a specific note on the effects of the pandemic on the Paris Region economy: How Covid-19 is forcing us to transform the economic model for The Paris Region, February 2021 Cover: © Yann Rabanier / Choose Paris Region 2nd cover: © Pierre-Yves Brunaud / L’Institut Paris Region © Yann Rabanier / Choose Paris Region Table of contents Welcome to Paris Region 5 Overview 6 Population 10 Economy and Business 12 Employment 18 Education 20 R&D and Innovation 24 Digital Infrastructure 27 Real Estate 28 Transport and Mobility 30 Logistics 32 Meetings and Exhibitions 34 Tourism and Quality of life 36 Welcome to Paris Region A Dynamic and A Thriving Business Paris Region, Fast-growing Region and Research Community A cultural and intellectual The highest GDP in the EU28 in A Vibrant, Innovative metropolis, a scientific and billions of euros.
    [Show full text]
  • Independence and Trade: the Speci C E Ects of French Colonialism
    Independence and trade: the specic eects of French colonialism Emmanuelle Lavallée¤ Julie Lochardy June 2012z Very preliminary. Please do note cite. Abstract Empirical evidence suggests that colonial rule and subsequent indepen- dence inuence past and current trade of former colonies. Independence ef- fects could dier substantially across former empires if they are related to the end of dierent preferential trade arrangements. Thanks to an original dataset including new data on pre-independence bilateral trade, this paper explores the impact of independence on former colonies' trade (imports and exports) for dierent empires on the period 1948-2007. We show that independence reduces trade (imports and exports) with the former metropole and that this eect is mainly driven by former French colonies. We also nd that, after independence, trade of all former colonies increase with third countries. A close inspection of the eects over time highlights that independence eects are gradual but tend to be more rapid and more intense in the case of exports. These results oer indirect evidence for the long-lasting inuence of colonial trade policies. Author Keywords: Trade; Decolonization; French Empire. JEL classication codes: F10; F54. ¤Université Paris-Dauphine, LEDa, UMR DIAL. Email: [email protected]. yErudite, University of Paris-Est Créteil. Email: [email protected]. zWe would like to thank participants at the IRD-DIAL Seminar and participants at the Con- ference on International Economics (CIE) 2012 for useful comments and suggestions. 1 1 Introduction Several studies highlight the consequences of colonial rule on bilateral trade. Mitchener and Wei- denmier (2008) assess the contemporaneous eects of empire on trade over the period 1870-1913.
    [Show full text]
  • Nantes Innovative City by and for All Synthesis of Nantes’Application to Icapital Awards 2019
    NANTES INNOVATIVE CITY BY AND FOR ALL SYNTHESIS OF NANTES’APPLICATION TO ICAPITAL AWARDS 2019 iCapital 2019 NANTES EUROPEAN CAPITAL OF INNOVATION CITIZEN DIALOGUE «Innovation “by and for all“ is at the heart of our policies. IN NANTES: The iCapital award is a recognition of the quality of our citizen dialogue and the dynamism of our metropolitan innovation ecosystem.» INNOVATION Johanna ROLLAND Mayor of Nantes BY AND FOR ALL President of Nantes Métropole © Martial Ruaud Over recent decades, citizens’ trust in representative democracy Convinced that cities are where innovative solutions to the Focus has weakened as shown in abstention in polls all over Europe. biggest challenges can be found, Nantes has been working since 2014 to give its inhabitants the means to be more involved FROM At the same time, urban challenges are more acute and cannot PARTICIPATORY be solved only by public sector interventions any more. and made citizen dialogue the cornerstone of its action. By focusing on the intelligence and strength of collective ASSESSMENT Nantes Metropole responded to these new democratic action, Nantes aims to tangibly improve public policies and TO CITIZEN aspirations and major urban transitions issues urban processes through citizen-driven innovation. For each ASSESSORS decision, from the renovation of a square to the definition of a (democratic, energy, ageing, digital, social inclusion) Nantes is committed strategy for the energy transition, we onboard the expertise of by developing new ways of building the city based on to develop all users. Nantes participation culture aims to create a tailored citizen participation and innovation by all and for all.
    [Show full text]
  • EMES Conferences Selected Papers Responsible Public Procurement: A
    Welfare societies in transition Roskilde, 16-17 April 2018 ECSP-3EMESPolanyi-01 Responsible Public Procurement: A De-Commodification of Public Markets? A Case Study in the City of Nantes, France Leslie Carnoye Roskilde, April 2018 Funded by the Horizon 2020 Framework Programme of the European Union 3rd EMES-Polanyi International Seminar Welfare societies in transition Full Paper Responsible Public Procurement: A De-Commodification of Public Markets? A Case Study in the City of Nantes, France Leslie Carnoye Postdoctoral researcher, ETHICS - Catholic Institute of Lille and Clersé - Lille University Abstract: Responsible Public Procurement (RPP) is increasingly identified as a key policy lever for innovation, local development and the ecological and social transition of territories. The aim of this paper is to explore the issues at stake around RPP, based on a qualitative case study and in the light of the institutionalist analysis of Karl Polanyi. First, the main rules and current practices related to RPP are briefly reviewed. Recent changes in the legal framework at the European and national levels are crucial for the development of RPP. But the importance of those changes remains difficult to assess because the jurisprudence around the new legal texts has not been produced yet. However, some non-risk-adverse cities such as Nantes Metropole have taken the lead. The second part of the paper presents the case study and its methodology. Nantes Metropole’s strategy for RPP, based on the introduction of CSR criteria in a series of experimental public markets, is rooted in a specific history and still faces important challenges. The third part of the paper aims at developing previous research results by analysing how a Polanyian theoretical perspective can help to better understand RPP.
    [Show full text]
  • Euro Medium Term Note Programme of a Maximum Amount of Euro
    Base Prospectus dated 16 June 2015 THIS DOCUMENT IS A FREE TRANSLATION OF THE FRENCH LANGUAGE "PROSPECTUS DE BASE" DATED 16 JUNE 2015 PREPARED BY THE COMMUNAUTE URBAINE MARSEILLE PROVENCE METROPOLE. IN THE EVENT OF ANY AMBIGUITY OR CONFLICT BETWEEN CORRESPONDING STATEMENTS OR OTHER ITEMS CONTAINED IN THESE DOCUMENTS, THE RELEVANT STATEMENTS OR ITEMS OF THE FRENCH LANGUAGE "PROSPECTUS DE BASE" SHALL PREVAIL. Communauté Urbaine Marseille Provence Métropole Euro Medium Term Note Programme of a maximum amount of Euro 400,000,000 The Communauté Urbaine Marseille Provence Métropole (the Issuer or the Communauté Urbaine Marseille Métropole or MPM) may, at any time, under the Euro Medium Term Note Programme (the Programme) which is subject to the present base prospectus (the Base Prospectus) and in compliance with applicable legislations, regulations and directives, issue debt notes (the Notes). The aggregate nominal amount of Notes outstanding shall not, at any time, exceed Euro 400,000,000. Application may, under certain circumstances be made for Notes to be admitted to trading on Euronext Paris (Euronext Paris). Euronext Paris is a regulated market as defined in Directive 2004/39/EC dated 21 April 2004 as amended (a Regulated Market). Notes may also be admitted to trading on another Regulated Market of a member State of the European Economic Area (EEA) or on a non-regulated market or not admitted to trading on any market. The final terms prepared for an issue of Notes (the Final Terms), based on the form set out in the Base Prospectus, shall specify whether or not such Notes shall be admitted to trading on a regulated market and shall list, if applicable, the relevant Regulated Market(s).
    [Show full text]
  • Colonial Marseille, 1906 and 2013
    Claiming Marseille Metropolis. A Diachronic Study on Urban Representation and Metropolitanism in (Post-)Colonial Marseille, 1906 and 2013 vorgelegt von Master of Arts Marlène de Saussure an der Fakultät I – Geistes- und Bildungswissenschaften der Technischen Universität Berlin zur Erlangung des akademischen Grades Doktorin der Philosophie – Dr. phil. – genehmigte Dissertation Promotionsausschuss: Vorsitzende: Prof. Dr. Kerstin Wittmann-Englert Gutachterin: Prof. Dr. Dorothee Brantz Gutachterin: Prof. Dr. Rosemary Wakeman Tag der wissenschaftlichen Aussprache: 15. April 2019 Berlin 2020 To Apa 2 Table of Content List of Illustrations ..................................................................................................................... 5 Author’s Declaration .................................................................................................................. 6 Acknowledgments ...................................................................................................................... 7 1. Introduction ........................................................................................................................ 9 1.1. Claiming Marseille Metropolis: Research Context and Problematization ............. 9 1.2. Theoretical Framework ........................................................................................ 13 1.3. Conceptual Approach and Case Studies ............................................................... 24 1.4. Analytical Approach ...........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Towards Establishing Virtuous Greenhouse
    EGU2020-5930 https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu2020-5930 EGU General Assembly 2020 © Author(s) 2021. This work is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. COoL-AMmetropolis : towards establishing virtuous greenhouse gas emission mitigation scenarios for 2035 in the Aix-Marseille metropolis area (France) through atmospheric top-down technics and social sciences methods in interaction with local stakeholders. Irène Xueref-Remy1, Aurélie Riandet1, Ludovic Lelandais1, Brian Nathan1, Mélissa Milne1, Valéry Masson2, Marie-Laure Lambert3, Alexandre Armengaud4, Jocelyn Turnbull5, Christophe Yohia6, Antoine Nicault7, Thomas Lauvaux8, Jacques Piazzola9, Christine Lac2, Thierry Hedde10, Samuel Robert11, Guillaume Simioni12, Wolfgang Cramer1, and Alberte Bondeau1 1OSU PYTHEAS / IMBE Mediterranean Institute of Biodiversity and of marine and continental Ecology, Aix-en-Provence Cedex 4, France 2CNRM, National research center on meteorology, Toulouse, France 3LIEU, Laboratoire Interdisciplinaire Aménagement Urbanisme, Aix-en-Provence, France 4AtmoSud, Regional Agency for Air Quality monitoring, Marseille, France 5GNS, Lower Hutt, New-Zeeland 6UMS Pytheas, Marseille, France 7GREC-SUD, Group of experts on climate in the PACA region, Marseille, France 8LSCE, Laboratoire des Sciences du Climat et de l'Environnement, Gif-sur-Yvette, France 9MIO, Mediterranean Institute of Oceanography, Marseille, France 10DTN, CEA Cadarache, Saint-Paul-lès-Durance, France 11ESPACE, Étude des Structures, des Processus d’Adaptation et des Changements de l’Espace, Aix-en-Provence, France 12INRA/URFM, Unité de Recherche sur les forêts méditerranéennes, Avignon, France Most of the global population leaves in cities, expected to expand rapidly in the next decades. Cities and their industrial facilities are estimated to release more than 70% of fossil fuel CO2, although these estimates need to be verified at the city scale.
    [Show full text]
  • Urban Rural Case Study Lille
    Lille Metropole, France Urban-rural linkages fostering sustainable development in Europe - Mini case study Reaching out to rural areas and with improved connectivity of different transport modes, Lille Métropole Communauté Urbaine has established an innovative transport system, increasingly fuelled by renewable energy sources. The case Lille Métropole Communauté Urbaine (LMCU) is a public inter-municipal co-operation body (covering 87 communes and 1.2 million inhabitants) in the Nord-Pas-de-Calais Region, working in close co-operation with its Belgian counterparts (600,000 people living on its Belgian side). Its scope of competencies includes the provision of services and amenities to the urban community in the following areas: town-planning, road infrastructure, mobility and parking facilities, urban public transport systems. Out of its total budget of €1.2 billion, more than one third is spent on transport. Lille is a very large metropolis covering around 600km 2. More than half of the area it covers is made up of rural land and small villages. All strategies and plans for the metropolis therefore need to take into account and balance the needs of rural developments and those of dense urban areas. The challenge facing LMCU was how to best develop the links between its inter-urban and international transport services so that the development is sustainable. High private car use and an unbalanced split in the use of road infrastructure among the various mobility modes led the LMCU to seek to improve inter-modality between all means of transport, limit the growth of private car use, and reduce car use in the city.
    [Show full text]
  • Vers Une Croissance Plus Inclusive De La Métropole Aix-Marseille : Une Perspective Internationale
    Vers une croissance plus inclusive de la métropole Aix-Marseille : Une perspective internationale Un rapport réalisé dans le cadre de la réunion ministérielle du Comité des politiques de développement territorial de l’OCDE Marseille, France 5 - 6 décembre 2013 Vers une croissance plus inclusive de la métropole Aix-Marseille : UNE PERSPECTIVE INTERNATIONALE Crédits photo : Le Grand Port Maritime de Marseille GR® 2013 G. Cambreleng R. Cintas Florès TABLE DES MATIÈRES – 3 Table des matières Méthodologie utilisée pour l’étude 9 Résumé 11 Chapitre 1 L’émergence d’une aire fonctionnelle intégrée : le destin collectif de la métropole 13 Introduction 13 Section 1.1. La troisième aire métropolitaine française en termes de population 13 Section 1.2. Une croissance démographique forte mais qui ralentit depuis quelques années 16 Section 1.3. Croissance démographique en périphérie de Marseille et étalement urbain 18 Section 1.4. Un marché du travail de plus en plus intégré 24 Conclusion 28 Chapitre 2 Une dynamique de croissance favorable mais fragile 29 Section 2.1. Une résilience plus grande à la crise par rapport aux autres métropoles françaises 29 Section 2.2. Un positionnement stratégique de la métropole 42 Section 2.3. Une métropole innovante aux bases fragiles 50 Section 2.4. Une attractivité économique en hausse 54 Conclusion 56 Chapitre 3 Une réalité métropolitaine masquant de fortes disparités socio-économiques 57 Section 3.1. Une des métropoles françaises les plus inégalitaires en matière de revenus et de chômage 57 Section 3.2. Les inégalités en matière d’éducation sont encore plus prononcées que les inégalités de revenu 62 Section 3.3.
    [Show full text]
  • Greater Paris Metropolis in Action
    GREATER PARIS METROPOLIS IN ACTION Métropole du Grand Paris 15-19 avenue Pierre Mendès-France 75013 PARIS - Tel. +33(0)1 82 28 78 00 www.metropolegrandparis.fr A Metropolis at the service of 7.2 million residents Since its creation, the Greater Paris Metropolis has taken concrete steps to benefi t its 7.2 million residents. The particular role of the Metropolis has become undeniable, as it takes up the challenges of economic, social and cultural development, working to protect the environment and enhancing its international attractiveness. Its action is focused on employment, investment and innovation. There is now global competition between metropolitan areas. These dense and connected urban areas have specifi c features in terms of housing, transport, the environment and the distribution of economic activity. Acting on these issues is central to the Great- er Paris Metropolis’ mission as it seeks to promote the well-being of its residents and its territory. All of these issues reveal the obvious need for the Greater Paris Metropolis. This inter-municipal establishment pools resources and simplifi es the administrative system. It restores balance to the territory, making solidarity a top priority. As the number one cen- tre for employment with the largest offi ce space anywhere in Eu- rope, the Greater Paris Metropolis is a major driver of global growth. 1 A continuous, A ROISSY- CHARLES DE GAULLE dense urban area AIRPORT B C D 17 LE BOURGET B AIRPORT PARIS TERRES € D'ENVOL BOUCLE PLAINE A NORD COMMUNE DE SEINE m 25% 7.2 GRAND RESIDENTS
    [Show full text]
  • La Métropole Aix-Marseille-Provence Une Construction Laborieuse
    La métropole Aix-Marseille-Provence Une construction laborieuse Octobre 2019 Philippe Langevin François de Geuser La métropole Aix-Marseille-Provence Une construction laborieuse Octobre 2019 Philippe Langevin François de Geuser Plan du document Editorial par Bernard Cheval, Président du Secrétariat social de Marseille p. 6 Avant-Propos p. 7 La métropole Aix-Marseille-Provence : histoire d’un succès programmé … … ou chronique d’un échec annoncé ? Titre I : Constats Chapitre 1 : Un vaste territoire profondément inégalitaire p. 16 1-Les atouts qui font cohérence p. 16 1-Un territoire très étendu 2-Un espace économiquement puissant 3-Un environnement exceptionnel 2-Les difficultés à surmonter p. 19 1-Une population âgée 2-Une faible attractivité 3-Un faible taux d’emploi 4-Une part relativement modeste des cadres dans la population active 5-Un emploi inégalement réparti 3-Une situation sociale préoccupante p. 22 1-Un taux de pauvreté élevé et un revenu médian faible 2-L’indicateur composite de fragilité 2 4-Une position défavorable par rapport aux autres métropoles en France p. 25 Chapitre 2 : Une construction imposée par l’Etat p. 27 1-Une construction difficile 2-Les lois fondatrices p. 29 1-La loi du 27 janvier 2014 de modernisation de l’action publique et d’affirmation des métropoles 2-La loi du 7 août 2015 portant nouvelle organisation territoriale de la République 3-La mise en œuvre effective de la métropole Aix-Marseille-Provence p. 33 1-2015 : L’Etat impose ses règles 2-2016 : La métropole s’organise 3-2017 : Essai de consolidation 4-2018 : Incertitudes et contraintes financières Chapitre 3 : Un budget qui n’a de métropolitain que le nom p.
    [Show full text]