DOCSLIB.ORG

Maximising Transit Oriented Development Opportunities in Chicago

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Maximising Transit Oriented Development Opportunities in Chicago Research conducted as part of Master of Urban Policy and Strategy, University of New South Wales Len Alzona, Ashleigh Gay, Laura Meyer, Luke Thompson, Hendry Wan * 20 November 2015 * Authors appear in alphabetical order Acknowledgement Prepared under the supervision of Professor Sue Holliday as part of Master of Urban Policy and Strategy (MUPS) at the University of New South Wales in Sydney, Australia. With support from Regional Transportation Authority (Jessica Hector-Hsu, Director Planning and Market Development, and administrative support from Tina Causby). Disclaimer This report has been prepared by students of the University of New South Wales. The report does not represent the views of the authors’ employers, Regional Transportation Authority or the University of New South Wales. Research for this report (including stakeholder engagement) was carried and the report prepared during the MUPS International Studio in Chicago, 6-20 November 2015. Cover image by Laura Meyer ii Table of Contents Executive Summary ............................................................................................................................... 1 Introduction ........................................................................................................................................... 3 Aims, Objectives, Audience & Approach ............................................................................................... 4 Traditional TOD Overview ..................................................................................................................... 5 Predictors of TOD success ................................................................................................................. 6 Key Themes ........................................................................................................................................... 8 Governance ....................................................................................................................................... 8 Growth ............................................................................................................................................. 10 Transit Experience ........................................................................................................................... 12 Sustainable, Resilient and Vibrant Communities ............................................................................. 13 Case Study Insights .............................................................................................................................. 14 Forest Park ....................................................................................................................................... 14 West Chicago ................................................................................................................................... 15 Creating Successful TOD in Chicago ..................................................................................................... 16 International Best Practice Insights ..................................................................................................... 17 1. Governance Models ..................................................................................................................... 17 2. Strategic Vision ............................................................................................................................ 20 3. Measures to Improve Funding Allocation .................................................................................... 23 4. Smart Cities .................................................................................................................................. 26 5. Community Engagement ............................................................................................................. 28 Recommendations ............................................................................................................................... 30 Conclusions for RTA ............................................................................................................................. 34 Bibliography ......................................................................................................................................... 36 Appendix 1: RTA project brief .............................................................................................................. 39 Appendix 2: Stakeholders in Chicago consulted for project ................................................................ 40 Appendix 3: Sample question sets used for stakeholder engagement process .................................. 42 Appendix 4: Qualities of Resilient Cities .............................................................................................. 44 iii Executive Summary The RTA has a mandate to increase ridership across Chicago’s transit system. Having identified Transit Oriented Development (TOD) as a key tool for achieving this goal, the RTA engaged a group of students from the University of New South Wales Master of Urban Policy and Strategy program to explore best practice ways to increase infill development around low to middle income transit areas. Forest Park and West Chicago were two case studies to understand this challenge within the Chicago region. With the RTA’s end goal of increasing ridership in mind, a range of general themes emerged from this work. These themes include governance, growth, transit experience and sustainable, resilient and vibrant communities. One of the key ways to encourage infill development that emerged from this work is to ensure a level of existing community amenity is already in place prior to further development. This requirement for communities to be ‘TOD ready’ is particularly important within the Chicago region given fragmented governance structures, low population growth and stable economic conditions and a tight fiscal environment. These themes were informed by general research on TOD, a stakeholder engagement process and site visits. In addition to these general themes, a range of insights emerged from research on international best practice strategies, policies and tools to increase TOD in low to middle income areas. The insights include: • Governance models that highlight the importance of coordination and collaboration • Tools to develop a strategic vision referencing Newcastle City Future 2056 and a Plan for Growing Sydney • Maximising TOD potential through need based assessment and funding options as demonstrated by the TOD Guideline by Portland and UK City Deals • Smart City initiatives from Vancouver and Dallas • Community engagement tool, Better Block, to build vibrant communities Based on this research it became clear that there are a range of ways to increase ridership in addition to TOD. However, when focusing on TOD in low to medium income areas, effort should be focused on building vibrant communities in the vicinity of existing transit. The best way to increase the use of the transit system is to enhance communities in these areas, making them more resilient to change and becoming attractive places to live and work. These communities including the case studies of Forest Park and West Chicago can then become well placed to accommodate TOD in the future. This research has led to a number of recommendations for consideration by the RTA. Several of the recommendations presented in this report are not directly related to the RTA’s role. However, in the context of increasing ridership ideas should be done in partnership with CMAP and other agencies or the private sector. Key recommendations for policy development include: • Develop a multi-agency strategic vision for the Chicago region identifies future growth corridors and TOD priority areas Maximising TOD Opportunities in Chicago 1 • Undertake a regional needs assessment for TOD and develop a framework that highlights TOD priority areas spatially to direct and prioritise investment • Increase rigour around the assessment and allocation of resources and grants for communities by developing a policy that assesses projects against the TOD priority framework • Develop policies that can support increased funding for transit that include the use of tools such as business cases • Build partnerships and programs with other agencies and the private sector to combine resources for maximum benefit Short term initiatives to build community resilience and vibrancy: • Develop a mandate for change by using use best practice community engagement strategies • Understand customer experiences using transit to help direct service improvements • Potential ‘day in the life of a customer’ periodic event where RTA and three service boards meet to experience a lifecycle journey together across different areas and modes • Consider a program that brings local business facilitators into the communities to engage stakeholders to achieve short term success stories and to develop main street programs Recommendations for the two case studies of Forest Park and West Chicago: An analysis of the needs and opportunities for TOD in the Chicago region may determine that the case study locations of Forest Park and West Chicago are not ready for TOD at this stage nor are they the highest priority for allocation of RTA resources for TOD. However, this research has found that there are a number of opportunities to build on the strengths of these communities,
Recommended publications
  • CTA BLUE LINE FOREST PARK BRANCH Vision Study FACT SHEET

    CTA BLUE LINE FOREST PARK BRANCH Vision Study FACT SHEET

    CTA BLUE LINE FOREST PARK BRANCH Vision Study FACT SHEET CTA Seeks Community Input After three years of working closely with local community groups, businesses and residents as well as municipal and agency stakeholders, CTA is completing the Blue Line Forest Park Branch Vision Study in preparation for the I-290/CTA public hearing in 2017. As we work on station designs and access, we are looking for input from residents and commuters who access the Forest Park Branch between UIC-Halsted and Austin to present preliminary station design concepts. We want to know: > How do you access these stations? > How can we improve your customer experience? > Tell us which station improvement concept you prefer! Visit the website and submit your comment www.transitchicago.com/blueweststudy History of the Blue Line Vision Study The Chicago Transit Authority (CTA) initiated the Blue Line Forest Park Branch Vision Study in 2013 to determine a long-term planning strategy for the Blue Line Forest Park Branch, in coordination with the Illinois Department of Transportation (IDOT) through their adjacent I-290 Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) Study. Through the project, CTA continues to assess transit enhancements, local access and mobility issues, policy options, and collaboration opportunities with IDOT. Improved station concepts include station access, redesign opportunities, and right-of-way (ROW) needs at specific stations along the corridor. The study has considered innovative solutions that enhance transit, while working with partner agencies to maximize mobility in this important regional corridor. Goals The Forest Park Branch of the Blue Line is 55 years old and beyond its useful life.
  • TRANSIT NEWS September, 1970

    TRANSIT NEWS September, 1970

    -CRUSADE 01 MERCY \fJ 1970 CRUSADE OF MERCY ~ TRANSIT NEWS September, 1970 What -is • • THE DIFFERENCE between what is and what should be - that's the "people gap" referred to in the Crusade of Mercy's 1970 campaign slogan, "Help Close the People Gap." Crusade of Mercy human care services are doing all they can to help close the people gap ... giving hope and assistance every day to people who face problems so tragic and complex they cannot handle them alone. The services themselves face a serious dollar gap--the difference between the needs of the people and help the funds available to meet those needs. close the people gap Three of the human care gaps are represented pictorially on our front cover. They are gaps between people in our metropolitan community. They are critical today and will be worse tomorrow unless steps are taken to close them now. 1THE FAMILY GAP Many families face tragic and complex problems too big to solve alone. Family counseling helps parents and children to understand each other and to communicate. Unfortunately, families needing help far outnumber the services. Your gift helps make more family services available. 2 THE ADOPTION GAP What happens to a handicapped baby without a home of his own? If he's lucky, a Crusade of Mercy service finds adoptive parents who will love and care for him. But there are many more babies -needing adoption than there are services. 3 THE DAY CARE GAP Young children of mothers who must work are often left alone or in the care of an older child.
  • A Socio-Historical Analysis of Public Education in Chicago As Seen in the Naming of Schools

    A Socio-Historical Analysis of Public Education in Chicago As Seen in the Naming of Schools

    Loyola University Chicago Loyola eCommons Dissertations Theses and Dissertations 1990 A Socio-Historical Analysis of Public Education in Chicago as Seen in the Naming of Schools Mary McFarland-McPherson Loyola University Chicago Follow this and additional works at: https://ecommons.luc.edu/luc_diss Part of the Education Commons Recommended Citation McFarland-McPherson, Mary, "A Socio-Historical Analysis of Public Education in Chicago as Seen in the Naming of Schools" (1990). Dissertations. 2709. https://ecommons.luc.edu/luc_diss/2709 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses and Dissertations at Loyola eCommons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Loyola eCommons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 License. Copyright © 1990 Mary McFarland-McPherson A SOCIO-HISTORICAL ANALYSIS OF PUBLIC EDUCATION IN CHICAGO AS SEEN IN THE NAMING OF SCHOOLS by Mary McFarland-McPherson A Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School of Loyola University of Chicago in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirement for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy January 1990 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The writer sincerely appreciates the patience, · endurance and assistance afforded by the many persons who extended their unselfish support of this dissertation. Special orchids to Dr. Joan K. Smith for her untiring guidance, encouragement, expertise, and directorship. Gratitude is extended to Dr. Gerald L. Gutek and Rev. F. Michael Perko, S.J. who, as members of this committee provided invaluable personal and professional help and advice. The writer is thankful for the words of wisdom and assistance provided by: Mr.
  • VIEW the COMPLETE ECONOMIC STUDY, Phase 2

    VIEW the COMPLETE ECONOMIC STUDY, Phase 2

    vision42 Economic and Fiscal Impacts of Proposed LRT Services in a Pedestrianized 42nd Street on Retail, Restaurants, Hotels & Theatres in the 42nd Street Corridor Prepared by Urbanomics, Inc. November 2006 vision42 an auto-free light rail boulevard for 42nd Street Phase II Technical Studies— Anticipated Economic Impacts on Retail, Hotels and Theaters Regina Armstrong, Principal-in-Charge Tina Lund, Senior Research Associate Heidi Gorman, Economic Planner Urbanomics 115 Fifth Avenue, 2nd Floor New York, NY 10003 212-353-7465 in association with Amos Ilan and Catherine Lanier October 16, 2006 vision42 Roxanne Warren, AIA, Chair George Haikalis, ASCE, Co-Chair The vision42 proposal is a citizens’ initiative sponsored by the Institute for Rational Urban Mobility, Inc. (IRUM), a New York City-based not-for-profit corporation concerned with advancing cost- effective transport investments that improve the livability of dense urban places. This study, one of a second round of three technical studies that address key concerns about the feasibility of the vision42 proposal, was made possible by a generous grant from the New York Community Trust/Community Funds, Inc., John Todd McDowell Environmental Fund. Institute for Rational Urban Mobility, Inc. P.O. Box 409, New York, NY 10014 212-475-3394 www.irum.org www.vision42.org Economic and Fiscal Impacts of Proposed LRT Services in a Pedestrianized 42nd Street on Retail, Restaurants, Hotels & Theatres in the 42nd Street Corridor 1 Executive Summary 2 The 42nd Street Corridor: Existing Conditions 2.1
  • 95Th Street Project Definition

    95Th Street Project Definition

    Project Definition TECHNICAL MEMORANUM th 95 Street Line May 2019 TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary...............................................................................................ES-1 Defining the Project......................................................................................ES-2 Project Features and Characteristics ..........................................................ES-3 Next Steps .....................................................................................................ES-7 1 Introduction .........................................................................................................1 1.1 Defining the Project ...............................................................................2 1.2 95th Street Line Project Goals.................................................................2 1.3 Organization of this Plan Document.....................................................3 2 Corridor Context ..................................................................................................6 2.1 Corridor Route Description ....................................................................6 2.2 Land Use Character ..............................................................................6 2.3 Existing & Planned Transit Service .........................................................8 2.4 Local and Regional Plans......................................................................8 2.5 Historical Resources ...............................................................................9

  • Transit Oriented Development Plan for the DELMAR LOOP and FOREST PARK–Debaliviere METROLINK STATIONS

    Transit Oriented Development Plan For the DELMAR LOOP and FOREST PARK–DeBALIVIERE METROLINK STATIONS prepared by H3 Studio for the City of Saint Louis Final Report September 2013 Acknowledgements CLIENT GROUP PLANNING TEAM The City of Saint Louis H3 Studio Lead Consultant Honorable Francis G. Slay Mayor Don Roe Director of Planning, Planning & Urban Design John Hoal, Ph.D., AICP Principal-In-Charge Agency Timothy Breihan, A.AIA Major Project Manager Connie Tomasula Urban Designer, Planning & Urban Design Laura L. Lyon, VP, CNU Project Manager Agency Bryan Taylor Robinson, AICP Sustainability Planner Project Manager St. Louis Development Corporation Courtney Cushard, LEED AP Urban Designer Angie Hristova Urban Researcher Otis Williams Executive Director Jonathan Stitelman Urban Designer Amy Lampe Major Project Manager Christopher Liao Technical Staff Reed Miller Technical Staff Andrew Luy Technical Staff TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE Bernardin, Lochmueller & Associates Cheryl Adelstein Director of Community Relations & Local Transportation Sub-Consultant Government Affairs, Washington University in St. Louis Douglas Shatto, PE, PTOE Transportation Services Todd Antoine Director for Planning, Manager Great Rivers Greenway District Christopher Beard, PE, PTOE Project Engineer Gary Boehnke Director, Skinker DeBaliviere Community Christopher Joannes Traffic Planner Housing Corporation Ryan Bumb Traffic Engineering Mary Campbell Assistant Vice Chancellor for Real Estate, Specialist Washington University in St. Louis Robert Innis Principal, Kim
  • Board 1: Blue Line Study Area History of the CTA Blue Line / I-290 System Blue Line / I-290 Infrastructure Is 55 Years

    Board 1: Blue Line Study Area History of the CTA Blue Line / I-290 System Blue Line / I-290 Infrastructure Is 55 Years

    Board 1: Blue Line Study Area History of the CTA Blue Line / I-290 system Blue Line / I-290 infrastructure is 55 years old First integrated transit / highway facility in the U.S. Project Study Area Existing CTA Blue Line: From Clinton Station to Forest Park Station IDOT Expansion Alternative: Forest Park Station to Mannheim Road A map showing the study area: The Study area captures the complete Blue Line from Clinton to Forest Park, and also allows for the evaluation of alternatives that could continue to Mannheim Road in coordination with I-290 EIS study. Specifically, a red box delineates the study area from 1 block east of Clinton station at Canal Street (east) to Mannheim Road (west), Madison Street (north) to Roosevelt Road (south). A photo of the Blue Line / I-290 Corridor with traffic congestion in four westbound lanes and the Blue Line approaching a station. Board 2: Blue Line Vision Study Project Schedule An image shows the project schedule, described by the following notes: Vision Study starting in 2013 with projected completion in 2017 Since the beginning of the study in Spring 2013, the following tasks have been completed: Data Collection, Station Concept Development, and Corridor Service Evaluation Station concept evaluation began in late 2013 and is ongoing through the end of the project. Public and Agency Outreach Meetings are indicated with a green dot on the horizontal timeline, marking meetings in each year of the project: 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016 and 2017 (Note: the project schedule has been updated from earlier versions to reflect delays.
  • Conceptual Service Patterns

    Conceptual Service Patterns

    Table of Contents 1.0 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................ 4 1.1 Organization of this Report .................................................................................. 4 1.2 Study Area ................................................................................................................ 4 2.0 EXISTING CONDITIONS ............................................................................................. 5 2.1 CTA Rail Forest Park Branch ................................................................................ 5 3.0 SERVICE PATTERNS ........................................................................................................... 6 3.1 Car Requirements ................................................................................................... 6 3.2 Train Requirements ................................................................................................ 6 3.3 Train Schedules ....................................................................................................... 6 4.0 POTENTIAL FUTURE SERVICE SCHEDULE .......................................................... 8 4.1 Average Daily Boarding Analysis ....................................................................... 8 4.2 Future Service Plan Options ................................................................................. 9 5.0 PRELIMINARY EVALUATION ................................................................................
  • Annual Ridership Report Calendar Year 2010

    Annual Ridership Report Calendar Year 2010

    Annual Ridership Report Calendar Year 2010 Prepared by: Chicago Transit Authority Planning and Development Planning Analytics 1/24/2011 Table of Contents How to read this report...........................................................................................i Monthly notes........................................................................................................ ii Monthly Summary ......................................................................................................................1 Bus Ridership by Route........................................................................................ 2 Rail Ridership by Entrance................................................................................... 9 Average Rail Daily Boardings by Line ................................................................ 23 How to read this report Introduction This report shows how many customers used the CTA bus and rail systems in calendar year 2009. Ridership statistics are given on a system-wide and route/station-level basis, with average ridership by type of day (weekday, Saturday, and Sunday) and annual totals. Beginning January 2008, the monthly ridership reports received an all-new design and revised layout, streamlining the report generation process. The new report contains both bus and rail ridership in the same report, while previously the two were broken out into separate reports. The new report layout provides the same key ridership statistics as the old reports, ensuring continuity and comparability of
  • Ordinance No. 013-79 an Ordinance Authorizing An

    Ordinance No. 013-79 an Ordinance Authorizing An

    ORDINANCE NO. 013-79 AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING AN INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT WITH THE STATE OF ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF CENTRAL MANAGEMENT SERVICES FOR THE STATE’S USE OF FIBER OPTIC CABLE ALONG THE CONGRESS BRANCH OF THE BLUE LINE WHEREAS, The Chicago Transit Authority (“Authority”) has installed fiber optic cable with a substantial number of optical fibers along the Authority’s rail system; and WHEREAS, Such installations may include more dark fibers than are needed for the Authority’s uses; and WHEREAS, Staff proposes entry into an intergovernmental agreement that would allow the State of Illinois Department of Central Management Services (“CMS”) to use four (4) of the Authority’s dark fibers starting at the Clark/Lake Station of the Blue Line and ending at the Forest Park Station of the Blue Line at no charge for a term of ten (10) years with renewal upon mutual agreement of the parties; and WHEREAS, CMS and its contractors will comply with all CTA safety and operations standards; and WHEREAS, CMS will be financially responsible for all costs associated with the installation, maintenance, repair, and relocation of its cables and/or equipment connected to the Authority’s fiber; and WHEREAS, CMS will indemnify and hold harmless the Authority for any loss due to or arising from CMS’s access to and use of the Authority’s fibers; now, therefore: BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CHICAGO TRANSIT BOARD OF THE CHICAGO TRANSIT AUTHORITY: SECTION 1. The Chairman, or his designee, is authorized to execute an intergovernmental agreement with the State of Illinois, Department of Central Management Services granting it a license to use four (4) of the dark fibers on the Authority’s fiber optic cable at no cost to the Authority along the Congress Branch of the Blue Line.
  • How to Use This Songfinder

    How to Use This Songfinder

    as of 3.14.2016 How To Use This Songfinder: We’ve indexed all the songs from 26 volumes of Real Books. Simply find the song title you’d like to play, then cross-reference the numbers in parentheses with the Key. For instance, the song “Ac-cent-tchu-ate the Positive” can be found in both The Real Book Volume III and The Real Vocal Book Volume II. KEY Unless otherwise marked, books are for C instruments. For more product details, please visit www.halleonard.com/realbook. 01. The Real Book – Volume I 10. The Charlie Parker Real Book (The Bird Book)/00240358 C Instruments/00240221 11. The Duke Ellington Real Book/00240235 B Instruments/00240224 Eb Instruments/00240225 12. The Bud Powell Real Book/00240331 BCb Instruments/00240226 13. The Real Christmas Book – 2nd Edition Mini C Instruments/00240292 C Instruments/00240306 Mini B Instruments/00240339 B Instruments/00240345 CD-ROMb C Instruments/00451087 Eb Instruments/00240346 C Instruments with Play-Along Tracks BCb Instruments/00240347 Flash Drive/00110604 14. The Real Rock Book/00240313 02. The Real Book – Volume II 15. The Real Rock Book – Volume II/00240323 C Instruments/00240222 B Instruments/00240227 16. The Real Tab Book – Volume I/00240359 Eb Instruments/00240228 17. The Real Bluegrass Book/00310910 BCb Instruments/00240229 18. The Real Dixieland Book/00240355 Mini C Instruments/00240293 CD-ROM C Instruments/00451088 19. The Real Latin Book/00240348 03. The Real Book – Volume III 20. The Real Worship Book/00240317 C Instruments/00240233 21. The Real Blues Book/00240264 B Instruments/00240284 22.
  • Prioritizing Sidewalk Investment Near Transit Supports a More Accessible Transportation System

    Prioritizing Sidewalk Investment Near Transit Supports a More Accessible Transportation System

    JAN. 15, 2020 PRIORITIZING SIDEWALK INVESTMENT NEAR TRANSIT SUPPORTS A MORE ACCESSIBLE TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM Key takeaways The new CMAP sidewalk inventory can be used to identify areas where sidewalk additions are most needed in order to improve pedestrian access to transit. Sidewalks can have the biggest impact when they connect transit with existing amenities and in areas with significant population or employment. In all six counties, communities have the opportunity to improve sidewalks near Metra stations. On the CTA system, the greatest impact can be achieved through targeted and prioritized investment near rail stations with high job density and where existing infrastructure caters to vehicles rather than pedestrians. Executive Summary Sidewalk inventory supports data driven investment decisions CMAP’s regional sidewalk inventory offers the first opportunity to comprehensively analyze sidewalk availability near transit in northeastern Illinois. Making transit more competitive is a key recommendation in the region’s long- range plan, ON TO 2050. Increasing transit ridership improves air quality by reducing the number of vehicles on the road, reduces highway congestion, and connects people to jobs, education, entertainment, and other amenities. In addition, public transit access is especially crucial for those who cannot drive or do not have access to a car. Ensuring that riders can safely access bus stops and trains stations on foot is a critical way the region can make transit safer and more competitive with other modes. Chicago