Evaluation of Transit Markets

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Evaluation of Transit Markets Table of Contents 1.0 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................ 8 1.1 Organization of this Report .................................................................................. 8 1.2 Study Area ................................................................................................................ 8 2.0 EXISTING CONDITIONS ........................................................................................... 11 2.1 CTA Rail Forest Park Branch .............................................................................. 11 2.2 CTA Bus Service ................................................................................................... 14 2.3 Pace Bus Lines in Study Area ............................................................................. 21 2.4 Bus Operations at Stations .................................................................................. 25 2.5 Pedestrian and Bicycle ......................................................................................... 28 3.0 STATION AREA MARKET ANALYSIS ......................................................................... 32 3.1 Methodology .......................................................................................................... 32 3.2 Transit Access to Stations .................................................................................... 32 3.3 Pedestrian Station Access .................................................................................... 38 3.4 Socioeconomic Characteristics ........................................................................... 40 3.5 Existing Land Use ................................................................................................. 49 4.0 CONCLUSIONS............................................................................................................. 52 4.1 Initial Recommendations .................................................................................... 54 4.2 Kedzie‐Homan ....................................................................................................... 54 APPENDIX A: STATION AND STUDY AREA PROFILES .............................................. 57 A.1 Clinton .................................................................................................................... 58 A.2 UIC‐Halsted ........................................................................................................... 61 A.3 Racine ...................................................................................................................... 64 A.4 Illinois Medical District ...................................................................................... 67 A.5 Western ................................................................................................................... 70 A.6 California (Closed) ............................................................................................... 73 A.7 Kedzie‐Homan ....................................................................................................... 76 A.8 Pulaski..................................................................................................................... 79 CTA Forest Park Branch Transit Market Feasibility/Vision Study 2 Technical Memorandum A.9 Kostner (Closed) .................................................................................................... 82 A.10 Cicero ...................................................................................................................... 85 A.11 Central (Closed) .................................................................................................... 88 A.12 Austin ...................................................................................................................... 91 A.13 Oak Park ................................................................................................................. 94 A.14 Harlem..................................................................................................................... 97 A.15 Forest Park ............................................................................................................ 100 A.16 Blue Line Study Area ......................................................................................... 103 APPENDIX B: BLUE LINE EXTENSION STUDY AREA ................................................. 106 B.1 Bus Operations at Potential Stations............................................................... 108 B.2 Socioeconomic Characteristics ......................................................................... 110 B.3. Potential Station Areas ...................................................................................... 111 B.4. Extension Options Evaluation .......................................................................... 133 B.5 Conclusion ........................................................................................................... 140 List of Tables Table 2.1. Blue Line Existing Headway by Time and Direction ........................................... 11 Table 2.2. Forest Park Branch Stations ..................................................................................... 12 Table 2.3. Forest Park Average Weekday Entries by Time Period ....................................... 14 Table 2.4. Forest Park Branch Ridership 2003‐2012 ................................................................ 15 Table 2.5. Service Characteristics by CTA Bus Route ............................................................ 16 Table 2.6. Service Characteristics by CTA Bus Route, Continued ....................................... 17 Table 2.7. Service Characteristics by Pace Bus Route ............................................................. 24 Table 2.8. Bus Service at each Blue Line Station ..................................................................... 25 Table 2.9. Bicycle Parking at or near each Blue Line Station ................................................. 30 Table 3.1. CTA Bus Flows and Transfers at Stations .............................................................. 35 Table 3.2. CTA Bus‐to‐Rail Transfer Market Share by Station .............................................. 36 Table 3.3. Pace Bus Daily Boardings and Alightings by Station .......................................... 37 Table 3.4. Population & Household Characteristics ............................................................... 40 Table 3.5. Occupied Housing Units by Vehicle Availability ................................................. 42 Table 3.6. LEHD Employment Characteristics, 2011 .............................................................. 46 Table 3.7. Existing Land Use in the Study Area...................................................................... 50 Table A.1. Clinton Station Area ................................................................................................ 59 Table A.2. Clinton Station Area Transit Data .......................................................................... 59 CTA Forest Park Branch Transit Market Feasibility/Vision Study 3 Technical Memorandum Table A.3. Clinton Station Area Bicycle Facilities ................................................................... 60 Table A.4. Clinton Station Area Employment......................................................................... 60 Table A.5. UIC Halsted Station Area ........................................................................................ 62 Table A.6. UIC Halsted Station Transit Data .......................................................................... 62 Table A.7. UIC Halsted Station Bicycle Facilities ................................................................... 63 Table A.8. UIC Halsted Station Area Employment ................................................................ 63 Table A.9. Racine Station Area .................................................................................................. 65 Table A.10. Racine Station Area Transit Data ......................................................................... 65 Table A.11. Racine Station Area Bicycle Facilities .................................................................. 66 Table A.12. Illinois Medical District Station Area .................................................................. 68 Table A.13. Illinois Medical District Station Area Transit Data ........................................... 68 Table A.14. Illinois Medical District Station Area Bicycle Facilities .................................... 69 Table A.15. Illinois Medical District Station Area Employment .......................................... 69 Table A.16. Western Station Area ............................................................................................. 71 Table A.17. Western Station Area Transit Data ...................................................................... 71 Table A.18. Western Station Area Bicycle Facilities ............................................................... 72 Table A.19. Western Station Area Employment ..................................................................... 72 Table A.20. California Station Area (Closed) .......................................................................... 74 Table A.21. California Station Area (Closed) Transit Data ................................................... 74 Table A.22. California Station Area (Closed) Bicycle
Recommended publications
  • Green Line Trains Ashland and Clinton: Pink Line
    T Free connections between trains Chicago Transit Authority Monday thru Friday Green Line Trains Ashland and Clinton: Pink Line. Clark/Lake: Blue, Brown, Orange, Pink, To Harlem To Ashland/63rd – Cottage Grove Purple lines. Leave Leave Arrive Leave Arrive Arrive Adams/Wabash: Brown, Orange, Pink, Ashland/ Cottage 35th- Adams/ Harlem/ Harlem/ Clark/ 35th- Ashland/ Cottage Purple lines. 63rd Grove Garfi eld Bronzeville Wabash Pulaski Lake Lake Pulaski Lake Bronzeville Garfi eld 63rd Grove Roosevelt: Orange, Red lines. Green Line 3:50 am ----- 4:00 am 4:08 am 4:17 am 4:36 am 4:47 am 4:00 am 4:12 am 4:25 am 4:39 am 4:49 am ----- 4:55 am State/Lake: Red Line (with Farecard only). ----- 4:09 am 4:15 4:23 4:32 4:51 5:02 4:12 4:24 4:37 4:51 5:01 5:10 am ----- 4:20 ----- 4:30 4:38 4:47 5:06 5:17 4:24 4:36 4:49 5:03 5:13 ----- 5:19 ----- 4:39 4:45 4:53 5:02 5:21 5:32 4:36 4:48 5:01 5:15 5:25 5:34 ----- Bikes on Trains 4:50 ----- 5:00 5:08 5:17 5:36 5:47 4:48 5:00 5:13 5:27 5:37 ----- 5:43 Trains ----- 5:09 5:15 5:23 5:32 5:51 6:02 5:00 5:12 5:25 5:39 5:49 5:58 ----- Bicycles are permitted on trains every weekday 5:20 ----- 5:30 5:38 5:47 6:06 6:17 5:10 5:22 5:35 5:50 6:00 ----- 6:06 Effective November 8, 2020 ----- 5:39 5:45 5:53 6:02 6:21 6:32 5:20 5:32 5:45 6:00 6:10 6:19 ----- except from 7:00 a.m.
    [Show full text]
  • CTA BLUE LINE FOREST PARK BRANCH Vision Study FACT SHEET
    CTA BLUE LINE FOREST PARK BRANCH Vision Study FACT SHEET CTA Seeks Community Input After three years of working closely with local community groups, businesses and residents as well as municipal and agency stakeholders, CTA is completing the Blue Line Forest Park Branch Vision Study in preparation for the I-290/CTA public hearing in 2017. As we work on station designs and access, we are looking for input from residents and commuters who access the Forest Park Branch between UIC-Halsted and Austin to present preliminary station design concepts. We want to know: > How do you access these stations? > How can we improve your customer experience? > Tell us which station improvement concept you prefer! Visit the website and submit your comment www.transitchicago.com/blueweststudy History of the Blue Line Vision Study The Chicago Transit Authority (CTA) initiated the Blue Line Forest Park Branch Vision Study in 2013 to determine a long-term planning strategy for the Blue Line Forest Park Branch, in coordination with the Illinois Department of Transportation (IDOT) through their adjacent I-290 Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) Study. Through the project, CTA continues to assess transit enhancements, local access and mobility issues, policy options, and collaboration opportunities with IDOT. Improved station concepts include station access, redesign opportunities, and right-of-way (ROW) needs at specific stations along the corridor. The study has considered innovative solutions that enhance transit, while working with partner agencies to maximize mobility in this important regional corridor. Goals The Forest Park Branch of the Blue Line is 55 years old and beyond its useful life.
    [Show full text]
  • TRANSIT NEWS September, 1970
    -CRUSADE 01 MERCY \fJ 1970 CRUSADE OF MERCY ~ TRANSIT NEWS September, 1970 What -is • • THE DIFFERENCE between what is and what should be - that's the "people gap" referred to in the Crusade of Mercy's 1970 campaign slogan, "Help Close the People Gap." Crusade of Mercy human care services are doing all they can to help close the people gap ... giving hope and assistance every day to people who face problems so tragic and complex they cannot handle them alone. The services themselves face a serious dollar gap--the difference between the needs of the people and help the funds available to meet those needs. close the people gap Three of the human care gaps are represented pictorially on our front cover. They are gaps between people in our metropolitan community. They are critical today and will be worse tomorrow unless steps are taken to close them now. 1THE FAMILY GAP Many families face tragic and complex problems too big to solve alone. Family counseling helps parents and children to understand each other and to communicate. Unfortunately, families needing help far outnumber the services. Your gift helps make more family services available. 2 THE ADOPTION GAP What happens to a handicapped baby without a home of his own? If he's lucky, a Crusade of Mercy service finds adoptive parents who will love and care for him. But there are many more babies -needing adoption than there are services. 3 THE DAY CARE GAP Young children of mothers who must work are often left alone or in the care of an older child.
    [Show full text]
  • Leisure Pass Group Or Big Bus
    All-Inclusive Guidebook Shedd Aquarium Attraction status as of Oct 2, 2020: Open Reservations required: book via Shedd Aquarium's website or by calling 312-939-2438. Please note: Shedd Aquarium is included exclusively on 1,2, 3, and 5-day All-Inclusive passes! It is not included in the Explorer pass or Build Your Own pass For an additional fee, you can also purchase tickets at the will-call ticket desk (pending availability) for a 4-D Experience. Shedd Aquarium is located on the Hop-On-Hop-Off-Bus Tour route at stop number 7: Shedd Aquarium, 1200 S. Lake Shore Drive. Hours of Operation We recommend visiting the Shedd Aquarium website for the most up-to-date information on hours of operation. Weekdays 9AM - 5PM Weekends and holidays 9AM - 6PM Closings & Holidays Thanksgiving and Christmas Day. Hours are subject to change without notice. Getting There Address On Chicago's Museum Campus 1200 S. Lake Shore Drive, Chicago, IL 60605 US Hop-On Hop-Off Tour Stops Take CTA: Red, Orange, or Green Line to the Roosevelt Road/Museum Campus stop. Take CTA bus #146 from points north or south as well as from the Roosevelt Road "L" stop. Closest Bus Stop Take CTA: Red, Orange, or Green Line to the Roosevelt Road/Museum Campus stop. Take CTA bus #146 from points north or south as well as from the Roosevelt Road "L" stop. 360 CHICAGO Attraction status as of Oct 2, 2020: Open Getting In: To skip the ticketing line, look for the Go Chicago pass signage in the admissions area and present your pass for validation.
    [Show full text]
  • Chicago Track Map [Pdf]
    Chicago Track Map Lehigh Ave To Waukegan & Kenosha, WI Wilmette To Antioch To Deerfield, Greyslake & Fox Lake Service Guide Amtrak to Milwaukee & All Points Northwest *27 *27 Glenview Greenleaf Ave *27 CTA Linden WILMETTE Green Bay Rd CTA Linden Yard Red Line Green Line Pink Line LAKE MICHIGAN Howard to 95th/Dan Ryan Harlem to Cottage Grove 54th/Cermak to Loop ‘L’ Glenayre Isabella All Times Weekdays: 4a to 12:50a Weekdays: 4a-1a GLENVIEW *27 Sat, Sun & Holidays: Sat, Sun & Holidays: 5a-1a Blue Line 5am to 12:50a O’Hare to Forest Park Harlem to Ashland/63rd Purple Line Central All Times Weekdays: 4:10a to 1:05a Linden to Howard Central St (Evanston) Sat, Sun & Holidays: Mon-Thu: 4:45a-1:30a Fri:4:50a-2:10a Brown Line 5:15a to 1:05a Sat: 5:30a-2:15a Sun & Holidays:6:30a-1:45a Kimball to Loop ‘L’ Linden to Loop ‘L’ Express Weekdays & Sat: 4a to 1a Orange Line Weekdays: 5:15a-9:15a, 2:25p-6:25p Golf Noyes Sun: 5a to 1a Midway to Loop ‘L’ Kimball to Belmont Weekdays: 3:30a-1:05a Yellow Line GOLF Weedays & Sat: 4a to 2a Harms Woods *26b Sat: 4a-1:05a Dempster-Skokie to Howard To Crystal Lake, McHenry & Harvard *26a Foster Holiday & Sun: 5a to 2a Green Bay Rd Sun & Holidays: 4:30a-1:05a Weekdays: 5a-11:15p Cumberland Sat, Sun & Holidays: 6:30a-11:15p East Northwest Hwy Emerson St Ave Benson Metra Lehigh Ave Davis Davis St Milwaukee Dist. North BNSF Railway Union Pacific Northwest (Evanston) Chicago Union Station to Fox Lake Chicago Union Station to Aurora Ogilvie T.C.
    [Show full text]
  • ROUTE River Road- August 11, 2019 Route 332 Use Your Ventra® Card York Road Or Exact Fare in Cash
    Effective Date REGULAR FARE ROUTE River Road- August 11, 2019 Route 332 Use your Ventra® Card York Road or exact fare in cash. 332 All Pace service is Transfer at the Rosemont CTA Driver Has No Change Station to/from Routes 221, wheelchair accessible. 223, 230, 303, 330, 600, 603, Customers may use a Ventra Card, contactless bankcard, Ventra 605, 606, 610, 616, 895 and the Rosemont Ticket, Ride Free or Reduced Fare permit, or cash to pay fares on Rosemont Entertainment Pace fixed route services. Reduced fares are available for children Circulator. (ages 7-11) and high school, junior high and grammar school Rosemont CTA students (ages 12-20) presenting a valid Ventra Student Riding Station Permit or valid school I.D. between 5:30am and 8:30pm on school days. Seniors 65 and older, people with disabilities and individuals Certain weekday trips only. FedEx Cargo with a valid Medicare card qualify for reduced fares. A valid RTA 4 CTA Blue Line 1 See Schedule. to Reduced Fare Permit must be presented when using cash to pay a to Chicago Delta O'Hare reduced fare. Eligible seniors and people with disabilities may ride Cargo 190 fixed route services for free through the RTA Ride Free Program. West Cargo i 5 South Please contact the RTA at (312) 913-3110 for more information on Access 330 326 free and reduced fares. Free rides are offered to children under 7 to 3 P&D River (max two children per fare paying adult), law enforcement officers Elgin/ Metra MD-West Line York I Center Lawrence and firefighters in full uniform or presenting a badge, and active duty Big Timber r Mannheim v military personnel in uniform.
    [Show full text]
  • VIEW the COMPLETE ECONOMIC STUDY, Phase 2
    vision42 Economic and Fiscal Impacts of Proposed LRT Services in a Pedestrianized 42nd Street on Retail, Restaurants, Hotels & Theatres in the 42nd Street Corridor Prepared by Urbanomics, Inc. November 2006 vision42 an auto-free light rail boulevard for 42nd Street Phase II Technical Studies— Anticipated Economic Impacts on Retail, Hotels and Theaters Regina Armstrong, Principal-in-Charge Tina Lund, Senior Research Associate Heidi Gorman, Economic Planner Urbanomics 115 Fifth Avenue, 2nd Floor New York, NY 10003 212-353-7465 in association with Amos Ilan and Catherine Lanier October 16, 2006 vision42 Roxanne Warren, AIA, Chair George Haikalis, ASCE, Co-Chair The vision42 proposal is a citizens’ initiative sponsored by the Institute for Rational Urban Mobility, Inc. (IRUM), a New York City-based not-for-profit corporation concerned with advancing cost- effective transport investments that improve the livability of dense urban places. This study, one of a second round of three technical studies that address key concerns about the feasibility of the vision42 proposal, was made possible by a generous grant from the New York Community Trust/Community Funds, Inc., John Todd McDowell Environmental Fund. Institute for Rational Urban Mobility, Inc. P.O. Box 409, New York, NY 10014 212-475-3394 www.irum.org www.vision42.org Economic and Fiscal Impacts of Proposed LRT Services in a Pedestrianized 42nd Street on Retail, Restaurants, Hotels & Theatres in the 42nd Street Corridor 1 Executive Summary 2 The 42nd Street Corridor: Existing Conditions 2.1
    [Show full text]
  • List of Appendices
    Pace/Metra NCS Shuttle Service Feasibility Study March 2005 List of Appendices Appendix A – Employer Database Appendix B – Pace Existing Service Appendix C – Pace Vanpools Appendix D – Employer Private Shuttle Service Appendix E – Letter, Flyer and Survey Appendix F – Survey Results Appendix G – Route Descriptions 50 Pace/Metra NCS Shuttle Service Feasibility Study March 2005 Appendix A Employer Database Business Name Address City Zip Employees A F C Machining Co. 710 Tower Rd. Mundelein 60060 75 A. Daigger & Co. 620 Lakeview Pkwy. Vernon Hills 60061 70 Aargus Plastics, Inc. 540 Allendale Dr. Wheeling 60090 150 Abbott Laboratories 300 Tri State Intl Lincolnshire 60069 300 Abbott-Interfast Corp. 190 Abbott Dr. Wheeling 60090 150 ABF Freight System, Inc 400 E. Touhy Des Plaines 60018 50 ABN AMRO Mortgage Group 1350 E. Touhy Ave., Ste 280-W Des Plaines 60018 150 ABTC 27255 N Fairfield Rd Mundelein 60060 125 Acco USA, Inc 300 Tower Pkwy Lincolnshire 60069 700 Accuquote 1400 S Wolf Rd., Bldg 500 Wheeling 60090 140 Accurate Transmissions, Inc. 401 Terrace Dr. Mundelein 60060 300 Ace Maintenance Service, Inc P.O. Box 66582 Amf Ohare 60666 70 Acme Alliance, LLC 3610 Commercial Ave. Northbrook 60062 250 ACRA Electric Corp. 3801 N. 25th Ave. Schiller Park 60176 50 Addolorata Villa 555 McHenry Rd Wheeling 60090 200+ Advance Mechanical Systems, Inc. 2080 S. Carboy Rd. Mount Prospect 60056 250 Advertiser Network 236 Rte. 173 Antioch 60002 100 Advocate Lutheran General Hospital 1775 Dempster St. Park Ridge 60068 4,100 Advocate, Inc 1661 Feehanville Dr., Ste 200 Mount Prospect 60056 150 AHI International Corporation 6400 Shafer Ct., Ste 200 Rosemont 60018 60 Air Canada P.O.
    [Show full text]
  • 95Th Street Project Definition
    Project Definition TECHNICAL MEMORANUM th 95 Street Line May 2019 TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary...............................................................................................ES-1 Defining the Project......................................................................................ES-2 Project Features and Characteristics ..........................................................ES-3 Next Steps .....................................................................................................ES-7 1 Introduction .........................................................................................................1 1.1 Defining the Project ...............................................................................2 1.2 95th Street Line Project Goals.................................................................2 1.3 Organization of this Plan Document.....................................................3 2 Corridor Context ..................................................................................................6 2.1 Corridor Route Description ....................................................................6 2.2 Land Use Character ..............................................................................6 2.3 Existing & Planned Transit Service .........................................................8 2.4 Local and Regional Plans......................................................................8 2.5 Historical Resources ...............................................................................9
    [Show full text]
  • [Picture of 79Th Street Bus] [Picture of a CTA Employee Wearing
    [BOOK FRONT COVER] Public Transit: An Essential Key to Recovery [Picture of 79th Street Bus] [Picture of a CTA employee wearing a mask] [2 different pictures of CTA employees performing COVID-19 related sanitation on a bus and train] President’s 2021 Budget Recommendations [CTA Logo] [BACK PAGE OF FRONT COVER] Chicago Transit Board and CTA President The governing arm of the CTA is the Chicago Transit Board, consisting of seven board members, one of which is currently vacant. The Mayor of Chicago appoints four board members, subject to the approval of the City Council and the Governor of Illinois. The Governor appoints three board members, subject to the approval of the State Senate and the Mayor of Chicago. CTA's day-to-day operations are directed by the President. Arabel Alva Rosales, Vice Chair Appointed by: Governor, State of Illinois Judge Gloria Chevere, Board Member Appointed by: Governor, State of Illinois Kevin Irvine, Board Member Appointed by: Mayor, City of Chicago Dr. L. Bernard Jakes, Board Member Appointed by: Governor, State of Illinois Rev. Johnny L. Miller, Board Member Appointed by: Mayor, City of Chicago Alejandro Silva, Board Member Appointed by: Mayor, City of Chicago Chicago Transit Authority Dorval Carter Jr., President TABLE OF CONTENTS System Map: page 1 President’s Letter: page 4 Organizational Chart: page 6 Executive Summary: page 8 Strategic Goals: page 26 Operating Budget Schedule: page 28 2020 Operating Budget Forecast: page 32 2021 Proposed Operating Budget: page 36 2022-2023 Two-Year Financial Plan: page
    [Show full text]
  • Conceptual Service Patterns
    Table of Contents 1.0 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................ 4 1.1 Organization of this Report .................................................................................. 4 1.2 Study Area ................................................................................................................ 4 2.0 EXISTING CONDITIONS ............................................................................................. 5 2.1 CTA Rail Forest Park Branch ................................................................................ 5 3.0 SERVICE PATTERNS ........................................................................................................... 6 3.1 Car Requirements ................................................................................................... 6 3.2 Train Requirements ................................................................................................ 6 3.3 Train Schedules ....................................................................................................... 6 4.0 POTENTIAL FUTURE SERVICE SCHEDULE .......................................................... 8 4.1 Average Daily Boarding Analysis ....................................................................... 8 4.2 Future Service Plan Options ................................................................................. 9 5.0 PRELIMINARY EVALUATION ................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • N:\JOE\RTCP\Interim Progress Report\Links\Report Cover.Tif
    Final Report Submitted to Regional Transportation Authority REGIONAL TRANSIT COORDINATION PLAN: LOCATION STUDY prepared by BOOZ·ALLEN & HAMILTON INC. in association with WELSH PLANNING July 2001 This report is confidential and intended solely for the use and information of the company to whom it is addressed Table of Contents Disclaimer Page.........................................................................................................................1 Section 1 – Project Summary...................................................................................................2 Section 2 – Study Purpose .......................................................................................................5 Section 3 – Background............................................................................................................7 3.1 Introduction .............................................................................................................7 3.2 Assessment of Transit Coordination ...................................................................8 3.2.1 Physical Coordination.............................................................................9 3.2.2 Service Coordination .............................................................................10 3.2.3 Fare Coordination ..................................................................................10 3.2.4 Information Coordination.....................................................................11 3.2.5 Other Themes and Issues......................................................................13
    [Show full text]