N:\JOE\RTCP\Interim Progress Report\Links\Report Cover.Tif

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

N:\JOE\RTCP\Interim Progress Report\Links\Report Cover.Tif Final Report Submitted to Regional Transportation Authority REGIONAL TRANSIT COORDINATION PLAN: LOCATION STUDY prepared by BOOZ·ALLEN & HAMILTON INC. in association with WELSH PLANNING July 2001 This report is confidential and intended solely for the use and information of the company to whom it is addressed Table of Contents Disclaimer Page.........................................................................................................................1 Section 1 – Project Summary...................................................................................................2 Section 2 – Study Purpose .......................................................................................................5 Section 3 – Background............................................................................................................7 3.1 Introduction .............................................................................................................7 3.2 Assessment of Transit Coordination ...................................................................8 3.2.1 Physical Coordination.............................................................................9 3.2.2 Service Coordination .............................................................................10 3.2.3 Fare Coordination ..................................................................................10 3.2.4 Information Coordination.....................................................................11 3.2.5 Other Themes and Issues......................................................................13 3.3 Analysis of Regional Travel ................................................................................16 3.3.1 Travel Demand Projections ..................................................................16 3.3.2 Geographic Analysis..............................................................................17 Section 4 – Characterization of Transfer Locations..........................................................24 4.1 Existing Transfer Locations ................................................................................24 4.1.1 Locations with Two Service Types....................................................25 4.1.2 Locations with Three Service Types..................................................30 4.1.3 Locations with Four Service Types ...................................................31 4.2 Potential Transfer Locations ..............................................................................31 Section 5 – Analysis of Transfer Activity...........................................................................38 5.1 Analysis of Priority Transfer Locations ............................................................38 5.2 Summary of Interagency Transfers ...................................................................44 5.2.1 Interagency Transfers at Existing Locations ....................................45 5.2.2 Interagency Transfers at Potential Locations...................................53 5.3 Transfer Location Priorities.................................................................................58 5.3.1 Assigning Priority to Existing Interagency Transfers…………….58 5.3.2 Assigning Priority to Potential Interagency Transfers……………64 5.3.3 Assigning Priority by Comparison of Zonal Travel………………64 Section 6 – Priorities for Investment at Transfer Locations ...........................................68 6.1 Transfer Coordination Issues ..............................................................................68 6.2 Transfer Coordination Costs ...............................................................................72 Appendices (Under Separate Cover) A Description of Transfer Location Database.........................................................75 B Method for Estimating Interagency Transfers ..................................................80 C Data Sources for Estimates of Interagency Transfers at Existing Locations..91 DISCLAIMER PAGE This document summarizes work conducted for the Regional Transit Coordination Plan. This document was prepared by Booz-Allen & Hamilton, Inc., under contract to the Regional Transportation Authority. Preparation of this document was financed in part through a grant from the U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Transit Administration under the Federal Transit Act, and/or the Illinois Department of Transportation. The contents do no necessarily reflect the official views of the U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Transit Administration, or the Illinois Department of Transportation. 1 SECTION 1: PROJECT SUMMARY The objective of the Location Study is to identify locations in the six counties of Northeastern Illinois where transfer activity occurs or could occur between services operated by the three service boards of the region: the Chicago Transit Authority (operating both bus and rail services), Metra (rail services), and Pace (bus services). Booz·Allen & Hamilton Inc., in association with Welsh Planning, has worked with management and staff from the Regional Transportation Authority (RTA) and each of the service boards to compile data, estimate levels of interagency transfer activity and then summarize the information to chart the future direction for transit coordination in the Chicago metropolitan area. The first stage of the study involved an assessment of transfer coordination in the Chicago metropolitan region. This assessment had two steps. First, the study team engaged stakeholders from various transit agencies, transportation planning entities, and other groups in developing a general sense of the strengths and weaknesses of transit coordination in the region. Challenges and opportunities to improve coordination were identified. Respondents related that transit system coordination is generally strongest in traditional markets where services and frequency are high and travel patterns are more established. Information and service coordination for other travel markets may warrant extra attention. Second, regional transit travel estimates were analyzed to determine general trends in transit travel affecting transit coordination. Projections of transit travel show that the spread of development outside of the traditional boundaries of Chicago's downtown, the growth in suburb to suburb travel, and the growth of reverse-commute travel from Chicago neighborhoods to suburban counties, require attention to the types of transit trips and transit connections serving those markets. Findings for both of these efforts are presented in Section 3. The second major phase of the study involved the identification of priority transit locations. This effort involved identification of the "universe" of existing and potential transfer locations and compilation of transit service characteristics associated with those locations. These characteristics were analyzed in a preliminary screen to determine a priority list for which to estimate the number of interagency transfers. Data were collected and methodologies were developed to estimate interagency transfers. The enumeration of locations is presented in Section 4. The transfer estimates and ranking of transfer location priority are presented in Section 5. The final piece of this study involves a summary of issues related to improving transit coordination at the priority locations identified. Issues are analyzed and generalized costs are presented in Section 6. 2 This investigation into the characteristics of interagency transfer locations, and the estimation of the levels of use of transfer locations, set the foundation for the Regional Transportation Authority and its partners to enhance and improve transit coordination throughout the region. Future initiatives to coordinate transit services can be informed by three ideas revealed in the analysis performed for this Location Study. First, most locations served by the current physical configuration of transit services can be accessed through existing interagency transfer connections. Second, the examination of regional travel and estimates of interagency transfer activity reveal several ways to prioritize future investments to improve transfer connections. Third, locations in downtown Chicago play a significant role in connecting transit services in the region. Each of these ideas are explained further below. First, physical connections between the existing services operated by the three service boards already serve most travel markets. Bus services operated by both CTA and Pace provide robust physical connections between radially-oriented commuter rail and rapid transit services and the suburban and Chicago neighborhood locations. Given the dispersal of travel patterns throughout the region, especially in locations outside of Chicago's downtown area, these bus and rail connections will likely retain their role as the primary links in the transit system. Because CTA and Metra both operate radially-oriented rail networks that parallel one another and serve similar markets, opportunities to improve mobility by adding connections between existing rail services are limited. However, new rail services that are more oriented toward serving cross-town services (e.g., the proposed Mid-City corridor), however, would pose a significant opportunity for improving regional mobility through transit connections. Second, investments for improving transit connections can be prioritized according to a three-tiered approach – 1) invest in locations already demonstrating
Recommended publications
  • Planners Guide to Chicago 2013
    Planners Guide to Chicago 2013 2013 Lake Baha’i Glenview 41 Wilmette Temple Central Old 14 45 Orchard Northwestern 294 Waukegan Golf Univ 58 Milwaukee Sheridan Golf Morton Mill Grove 32 C O N T E N T S Dempster Skokie Dempster Evanston Des Main 2 Getting Around Plaines Asbury Skokie Oakton Northwest Hwy 4 Near the Hotels 94 90 Ridge Crawford 6 Loop Walking Tour Allstate McCormick Touhy Arena Lincolnwood 41 Town Center Pratt Park Lincoln 14 Chinatown Ridge Loyola Devon Univ 16 Hyde Park Peterson 14 20 Lincoln Square Bryn Mawr Northeastern O’Hare 171 Illinois Univ Clark 22 Old Town International Foster 32 Airport North Park Univ Harwood Lawrence 32 Ashland 24 Pilsen Heights 20 32 41 Norridge Montrose 26 Printers Row Irving Park Bensenville 32 Lake Shore Dr 28 UIC and Taylor St Addison Western Forest Preserve 32 Wrigley Field 30 Wicker Park–Bucktown Cumberland Harlem Narragansett Central Cicero Oak Park Austin Laramie Belmont Elston Clybourn Grand 43 Broadway Diversey Pulaski 32 Other Places to Explore Franklin Grand Fullerton 3032 DePaul Park Milwaukee Univ Lincoln 36 Chicago Planning Armitage Park Zoo Timeline Kedzie 32 North 64 California 22 Maywood Grand 44 Conference Sponsors Lake 50 30 Park Division 3032 Water Elmhurst Halsted Tower Oak Chicago Damen Place 32 Park Navy Butterfield Lake 4 Pier 1st Madison United Center 6 290 56 Illinois 26 Roosevelt Medical Hines VA District 28 Soldier Medical Ogden Field Center Cicero 32 Cermak 24 Michigan McCormick 88 14 Berwyn Place 45 31st Central Park 32 Riverside Illinois Brookfield Archer 35th
    [Show full text]
  • Traffic Impact Study 4600 N
    Traffic Impact Study 4600 N. Marine Drive Residential Development Chicago, Illinois Prepared For: DRAFT May 28, 2021 Table of Contents List of Figures and Tables, ii I. Executive Summary ..................................................................................................................... 1 1. Introduction ................................................................................................................................. 3 2. Existing Conditions ..................................................................................................................... 6 Site Location ............................................................................................................................... 6 Existing Street System Characteristics ....................................................................................... 6 Lake Shore Drive Improvement Study ....................................................................................... 9 Public Transportation .................................................................................................................. 9 Alternative Modes of Transportation ........................................................................................ 12 Existing Traffic Volumes .......................................................................................................... 13 3. Traffic Characteristics of the Proposed Development ................................................................... 16 Existing Site and Proposed Development
    [Show full text]
  • August 2015 ERA Bulletin.Pub
    The ERA BULLETIN - AUGUST, 2015 Bulletin Electric Railroaders’ Association, Incorporated Vol. 58, No. 8 August, 2015 The Bulletin TWO ANNIVERSARIES — Published by the Electric SEA BEACH AND STEINWAY TUNNEL Railroaders’ Association, Incorporated, PO Box The first Brooklyn Rapid Transit (BRT) was incorporated on August 29, 1896. 3323, New York, New steel cars started operating in revenue ser- BRT acquired the company’s stock on or York 10163-3323. N about November 5, 1897. The line was elec- vice on the Sea Beach Line (now ) and the new Fourth Avenue Subway one hundred trified with overhead trolley wire at an un- For general inquiries, years ago, June 22, 1915. Revenue opera- known date. contact us at bulletin@ tion began at noon with trains departing from A March 1, 1907 agreement allowed the erausa.org . ERA’s Chambers Street and Coney Island at the company to operate through service from the website is th www.erausa.org . same time. Two– and three-car trains were Coney Island terminal to 38 Street and New routed via Fourth Avenue local tracks and Utrecht Avenue. Starting 1908 or earlier, nd Editorial Staff: southerly Manhattan Bridge tracks. trains operate via the Sea Beach Line to 62 Editor-in-Chief : On March 31, 1915, Interborough Rapid Street and New Utrecht Avenue, the West Bernard Linder End (now D) Line, and the Fifth Avenue “L.” Tri-State News and Transit, Brooklyn Rapid Transit, and Public Commuter Rail Editor : Service Commission officials attended BRT’s Sea Beach cars were coupled to West End Ronald Yee exhibit of the new B-Type cars, nicknamed or Culver cars.
    [Show full text]
  • 66 Annual Midwest Conference on British Studies September 27-29
    “Manchester Heroes” 1819 (Colour). I.R. Cruikshank. © Manchester Libraries (GB127.m77801) 66th Annual Midwest Conference on British Studies September 27-29, 2019 Chicago, IL Hosted by Loyola University Chicago MWCBS 2019 HOSTED BY LOYOLA UNIVERSITY CHICAGO LOCAL GUIDE TO CHICAGO Welcome to Chicago! Loyola University Chicago is pleased to host the 2019 MWCBS in Chicago. Chicago is a world- class city that is second to none in every Chicagoan’s book. It is best known for being the home of the skyscraper, a majestic 26-mile lakeshore with an 18.5-mile lakefront path, and the many long-winded politicians who gave the city its nickname—the Windy City. The city is rich with historic sites from the nineteenth and twentieth centuries, and also boasts access to a host of excellent bars, restaurants, breweries, live music, and sporting events for the curious traveler to sample. Many of these sites are located within walking distance of the Hampton Inn Chicago North—Loyola Station or are just a short taxi ride away. Getting around: Travel to Hotel from Chicago O’Hare (ORD) or Chicago Midway (MDW): From O'Hare Airport: Take I-90 East 2.7 miles to Exit 82A Nagle. Take 1st left onto Nagle Ave and go 1.05 miles. Take a right onto Devon Ave and go 4.02 miles. Turn left onto N. Kedzie Ave and go for 0.50 miles to Pratt Blvd and take a right. Take Pratt Blvd for 2.35 miles to Lakewood Ave and take a right for 0.18 miles and then take a slight left onto Albion Ave and go 0.14 miles.
    [Show full text]
  • Southeast Corridor Alternatives Analysis Locally Preferred Alternative Report
    SOUTHEAST CORRIDOR ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS DOCUMENT #9 LOCALLY PREFERRED ALTERNATIVE REPORT PREPARED BY AUGUST 2011 METRA – SOUTHEAST CORRIDOR LOCALLY PREFERRED ALTERNATIVE REPORT ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS DOCUMENTS 1. Detailed Work Scope 2. Purpose & Need 3. Initial Alternatives, Part I: Modes & Technologies 4. Evaluation Methodology 5. Initial Alternatives, Part I Screening and Part II: Conceptual Design 6. Screening of Initial Alternatives, Part II 7. Feasible Alternatives 8. Screening of Feasible Alternatives 9. Locally Preferred Alternative Report AECOM AUGUST 2011 I METRA – SOUTHEAST CORRIDOR LOCALLY PREFERRED ALTERNATIVE REPORT TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION.......................................................................................................... 1 A. PURPOSE.................................................................................................................. 1 B. BACKGROUND ......................................................................................................... 1 II. SUMMARY OF ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS.............................................................. 5 A. INITIAL SCREENING, PART I................................................................................... 5 B. DEFINITION AND SCREENING OF INITIAL ALTERNATIVES, PART II.................. 7 C. DEFINITION OF FEASIBLE ALTERNATIVES ........................................................ 10 D. DETAILED FINAL SCREENING.............................................................................. 11 III. PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT SUMMARY.......................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Steve Hastalis Committee Members
    1 ADA Advisory Committee Meeting Minutes Monday, April 14, 2014 Members Present Chairperson: Steve Hastalis Committee Members: Garland Armstrong Rhychell Barnes Dorrell Perry Doreen Bogus Mary Anne Cappelleri Bryen Yunashko Grace Kaminkowitz Excused: Maurice Fantus Tim Fischer Laura Miller Facilitator: Amy Serpe, CTA Manager, ADA Compliance Programs Steve Hastalis, Committee Chairman called the meeting to order at 1:30 p.m. Roll Call • Members of the Committee introduced themselves. • Maurice Fantus, Tim Fischer, and Laura Miller had excused absences from the meeting. Announcement • There was an announcement that Yochai Eisenberg has resigned from the Committee. Approval of Minutes from January 13, 2014 Meeting • There were a couple of changes to the January 14, 2014 minutes. Rosemary Gerty pointed out the correct spelling of Anne LeFevre’s name. Ms. Gerty clarified that the RTA Appeals Board for Paratransit certification does not reevaluate, but rather discusses the terms of appeals in order to gain additional information. Ms. Gerty also updated the number of appeals in 2013 to 112. Ms. Kaminkowitz withdrew her motion and moved to accept the minutes as corrected. Mr. Armstrong seconded the motion. Mr. Hastalis asked for a vote to approve the minutes as amended. The Committee unanimously approved the minutes of the Committee’s January 14, 2014 meeting. Rail Car Information • Mr. Robert Kielba, Chief Rail Equipment Engineer, stated that there are about 432, 5,000 Series rail cars in service. There are 14 cars running with the new door opening chime activated primarily on the Red, Yellow, and Purple Lines. • There are 58 cars loaded with the software at a rate of four to six cars completed in a week.
    [Show full text]
  • RED VEST Issue Campaign
    The in this RED VEST issue Campaign = * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * NATIONAL TRANSPORTATION WEEK A New Look at Railroading VJHTl.lALLY eve'l'ything Ame1'icans FACT 1Ise mores by rail at some point of its formation ancl along the d'ist1'ilmtion Railroad rolling' stock owned 01' leased j'oute to consumej·s. The bed a pe'l'son as of Dec. 31, 1963 included 28,600 locomotives, 1,515,139 freight cars and Vol. 52 May-June 1964 No.2 sleep.~ in, the ala'l'm doc/,; that alvak­ ens llim, tlle b'reak/ast he eats, the 25,800 passenger cars. The freight conreyrmr.e he 1I8e8 to get to ·1COI'I.'­ car fleet, placed end to end, would all, in oue form 0'1' anotltp,j', depend form a solid train 14,348 miles long, on tl'ansp01·tation fOj' n/'ll' rn(lte1'irlls spanning the continent more than 4 and luuls basic to pTodllction. lVith­ times. ouf. it the1'e isn't a r.ity in the ~'nited States tlwl; lcouldn't come to a .r;rind­ FACT in!} pconomic halt. MARIE HOTTON N (I tional Transportation lVeek Hf'l'e are some of the things the rail­ (In roads do erej'Y 24 hours: Managing Editor "May 10-16 ott'el'ed oppoTtunity to '1'('111 inr7 the p/(blic of how that 'role is * Movr. about 9 tons of freight a dis­ played in 1964. The fol101cing high­ tance of one mile for every man, PUBLIC RELATIONS /il/hts (Jj'p, fj'om a "facts" bj'oc)ml'e woman and child in the United DEPARTMENT leh ieh was rlist1'ibutecl dW'ing that States.
    [Show full text]
  • Individual and Organizational Donors
    INDIVIDUAL AND ORGANIZATIONAL Illinois Tool Works Foundation Colliers International The Irving Harris Foundation Community Memorial Foundation DONORS J.R. Albert Foundation Crain's Chicago Business Jones Lang LaSalle Patrick and Anna M. Cudahy Fund $100,000 and above The Joyce Foundation Cushman & Wakefield of Illinois, Inc. Anonymous (8) Julie and Brian Simmons Foundation The Damico Family Foundation The Aidmatrix Foundation Knight Family Foundation Mr. Floyd E. Dillman and Dr. Amy Weiler Bank of America Russell and Josephine Kott DLA Piper LLP (US) Charter One Memorial Charitable Trust Eagle Seven, LLC The Chicago Community Trust Henrietta Lange Burk Fund The Earl and Brenda Shapiro Foundation Feeding America Levenfeld Pearlstein, LLC Eastdil Secured Daniel Haerther Living Trust Chicago and NW Mazda Dealers C. J. Eaton Hillshire Brands Foundation Mr. Clyde S. McGregor and Edelstein Foundation JPMorgan Chase Ms. LeAnn Pedersen Pope Eli and Dina Field Family Foundation Mr. Michael L. Keiser and Mrs. Rosalind Keiser Elizabeth Morse Genius Charitable Trust Mr. and Mrs. Eugene F. Fama Kraft Foods Foundation Mr. Saumya Nandi and Ms. Martha Delgado Mr. and Mrs. James Ferry, III Mr. Irving F. Lauf, Jr. Mr. and Mrs. David J. Neithercut Fortune Brands, Inc. Ann and Robert H. Lurie Foundation Dr. Tim D. Noel and Mrs. Joni L. Noel Franklin Philanthropic Foundation McDonald's Corporation Ms. Abby H. Ohl and Mr. Arthur H. Ellis Garvey's Office Products Polk Bros. Foundation The John C. & Carolyn Noonan GE Foundation J.B. and M.K. Pritzker Family Foundation Parmer Private Foundation General Iron Industries Charitable Foundation The Retirement Research Foundation Ms. Laura S.
    [Show full text]
  • [Picture of 79Th Street Bus] [Picture of a CTA Employee Wearing
    [BOOK FRONT COVER] Public Transit: An Essential Key to Recovery [Picture of 79th Street Bus] [Picture of a CTA employee wearing a mask] [2 different pictures of CTA employees performing COVID-19 related sanitation on a bus and train] President’s 2021 Budget Recommendations [CTA Logo] [BACK PAGE OF FRONT COVER] Chicago Transit Board and CTA President The governing arm of the CTA is the Chicago Transit Board, consisting of seven board members, one of which is currently vacant. The Mayor of Chicago appoints four board members, subject to the approval of the City Council and the Governor of Illinois. The Governor appoints three board members, subject to the approval of the State Senate and the Mayor of Chicago. CTA's day-to-day operations are directed by the President. Arabel Alva Rosales, Vice Chair Appointed by: Governor, State of Illinois Judge Gloria Chevere, Board Member Appointed by: Governor, State of Illinois Kevin Irvine, Board Member Appointed by: Mayor, City of Chicago Dr. L. Bernard Jakes, Board Member Appointed by: Governor, State of Illinois Rev. Johnny L. Miller, Board Member Appointed by: Mayor, City of Chicago Alejandro Silva, Board Member Appointed by: Mayor, City of Chicago Chicago Transit Authority Dorval Carter Jr., President TABLE OF CONTENTS System Map: page 1 President’s Letter: page 4 Organizational Chart: page 6 Executive Summary: page 8 Strategic Goals: page 26 Operating Budget Schedule: page 28 2020 Operating Budget Forecast: page 32 2021 Proposed Operating Budget: page 36 2022-2023 Two-Year Financial Plan: page
    [Show full text]
  • Click This Link
    CICERO CONNECTIONS TRANSIT AREA IMPLEMENTATION PLAN FINAL PLAN - NOVEMBER 2014 LAKOTA STEERING COMMITTEE Jose Alvarez, Grant Director, Town of Cicero Kristen Andersen, Metra Lenny Cannata, West Central Municipal Conference David Chandler, Center for Neighborhood Technology Jay Ciavarella, Regional Transportation Authority Dominick Gatto, Town of Cicero Resident Louis Guido, Town of Cicero Resident Steve Hands, Chicago Transit Authority Barbara Harris, Town of Cicero Resident Jennifer Henry, Chicago Transit Authority Michael Horsting, Regional Transportation Authority David Kralik, Metra Dr. Michael Kuzniewski, J Sterling Morton High School District 201 Joe Lacobucci, Chicago Transit Authority Eric Llewellyn, Pace Taylor McKinley, Center for Neighborhood Technology Amber Munday, DelGaldo Law Group Merrie Neal, Town of Cicero Resident Craig Pesek, Town Project Manager, Town of Cicero Rosa Raygoza, Project Manager Assistant, Town of Cicero Lucy Schmidt, Town of Cicero Resident Kyle Smith, Center for Neighborhood Technology Heather Tabbert, Regional Transportation Authority Tammy Wierciak, West Central Municipal Conference table of contents SECTION 1: THE PLAN 4 What Is The Transit Area Implementation Plan? 5 Key Opportunity Sites 8 Transportation Improvements 26 Character & Identity Enhancements 34 SECTION 2: IMPLEMENTATION 41 Overview 41 Communication and Coordination 42 Priority Actions and Projects 44 Potential Funding Sources 49 Key Transit Area Initiatives 53 APPENDIX A 58 Transit Customer Survey TRANSIT AREA IMPLEMENTATION PLAN CICERO
    [Show full text]
  • Routes 302, 311, 314, 319, 332 Temporary Modified Schedule Alert Starts Monday, May 18, 2020
    Routes 302, 311, 314, 319, 332 Temporary Modified Schedule Alert Starts Monday, May 18, 2020 Due to the COVID-19 (coronavirus) pandemic, Routes 302, 311, 314, 319 and 332 will temporarily operate with modified weekday schedules until further notice as shown below: Route 302 – weekday service will operate on the Saturday schedule. Route 311 – weekday service will operate on the Saturday schedule. Route 314 – the following weekday trips will NOT operate: Northbound (departing from Morton College): 4:55am, 5:55am, 6:55am, 7:55am, 3:37pm, 4:37pm, 5:37pm Southbound (departing from Lake/Cuyler): 5:30am, 6:30am, 7:30am, 3:17pm, 4:17pm, 5:17pm, 6:17pm Route 319 – the following weekday trips between Wolf/North and Bensenville Metra Station will NOT operate: Westbound (departing from Wolf/North): 6:52am, 7:52am, 3:51pm, 4:51pm Eastbound (departing from Bensenville Metra): 7:18am, 3:18pm, 4:18pm, 5:18pm Route 332 – the following weekday trips will NOT operate: Southbound (departing from CTA Blue Line Rosemont Station): 3:52pm Northbound (departing from Oakbrook Center): 5:18pm All trips on these routes that are not noted above will continue to operate their normal schedule. Pace Bus Tracker and other trip planning software will be updated as soon as possible to reflect these temporary schedule modifications. AE/KS 4/24/2020 Remove TBA REGULAR FARE ROUTE Use your Ventra® Card Ogden- or exact fare in cash. Stanley Driver Has No Change 302 Customers may use a Ventra Card, contactless bankcard, Ventra to Chicago Ticket, Ride Free or Reduced Fare permit, or cash to pay fares on All Pace service is Pace fixed route services.
    [Show full text]
  • 2014 Budget Recommendations
    MODERNIZING TRANSIT FOR THE FUTURE PRESIDENT’S 2014 BUDGET RECOMMENDATIONS (THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK) CTA FY14 Budget Table of Contents Letter from the President ........................................................................................................................................ 1 CTA Organizational Chart ........................................................................................................................................ 5 Executive Summary ................................................................................................................................................... 7 2013 Operating Budget Performance 2012 Operating Budget Performance Summary ........................................................................................ 25 2012 Operating Budget Schedule ..................................................................................................................... 34 President’s 2014 Proposed Operating Budget President’s 2013 Proposed Operating Budget Summary ....................................................................... 35 President’s 2013 Proposed Operating Budget Schedule ......................................................................... 42 President’s 2015-2016 Proposed Operating Financial Plan President’s 2015-2016 Proposed Operating Financial Plan Summary ............................................. 43 President’s 2015-2016 Proposed Operating Financial Plan Schedule .............................................. 47 2014-2018 Capital
    [Show full text]