Sacramento County SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN Department of Transportation 2017 to 2021

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Sacramento County SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN Department of Transportation 2017 to 2021 SACRAMENTO COUNTY Prepared For: Sacramento County SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN Department of Transportation 2017 TO 2021 Prepared by: Sacramento Area Council of Governments THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK FINAL DRAFT SACRAMENTO COUNTY SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN FISCAL YEARS 2016/17 TO 2020/-21 Prepared by: Sacramento Area Council of Governments 1415 L Street, Suite 300 Sacramento, CA 95814 Tel: 916.321.9000 www.sacog.org Prepared for: Sacramento County Department of Transportation Tel: 916-874-6291 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS SACOG THANKS THE FOLLOWING FOR THEIR HELP IN DEVELOPING THIS SRTP: Dan Klinker, Associate Civil Engineer, Sacramento County Becky Egleston, Site Manager, SCT/LINK Ann Dennis, Administrative Analyst, City of Galt Carla Meyer, Former General Manager, Amador Transit THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................. 2 CHAPTER 1 - INTRODUCTION ................................................................. 8 CHAPTER 2 - PLANNING CONTEXT ...................................................... 10 CHAPTER 3 - OVERVIEW OF SCT/LINK SERVICE ................................. 24 CHAPTER 4 - HIGHWAY 99 EXPRESS ................................................... 28 CHAPTER 5 - DELTA ROUTE ................................................................. 36 CHAPTER 6 - GALT-SACRAMENTO COMMUTER EXPRESS .................. 42 CHAPTER 7 - SCT/LINK DIAL-A-RIDE .................................................... 46 CHAPTER 8 - EAST COUNTY SERVICE ................................................. 58 CHAPTER 9 - GOALS, POLICIES, & PRIOR RECOMMENDATIONS ....... 62 CHAPTER 10 - MARKETING ................................................................... 76 CHAPTER 11 - FINANCIAL AND SERVICE PLAN ................................... 84 APPENDIX A—STORER CONTRACT PERFORMANCE MEASURES APPENDIX B— SAMPLE MONTHLY REPORTS FROM REGIONAL TRANSIT & PARATRANSIT, INC APPENDIX C— EXCERPT FROM MOORE & ASSOCIATES REPORT REGARDING STC/LINK MANAGEMENT STRUCTURE THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK LIST OF FIGURES Figure 2.1 South and East County Areas ...................................................................... 10 Figure 2.2 Sacramento County SRTP – Detail of Study Area ....................................... 11 Figure 2.3 General Plan Map 2030 ............................................................................... 17 Figure 2.4 Map of Recent and Planned Developments ................................................. 19 Figure 2.5 Map of Eastview Specific Plan Area ............................................................. 21 Figure 3.1 Holiday Schedule ......................................................................................... 24 Figure 3.2 Trips Per Year, FY 2011/12 to FY 2015/16 .................................................. 25 Figure 4.1 Frequency of Use ......................................................................................... 28 Figure 4.2 Highway 99 Express Route Map .................................................................. 29 Figure 4.3 Highway 99 Express Trip Purpose ............................................................... 32 Figure 4.4 Longevity of Use .......................................................................................... 33 Figure 5.1 Delta Route Map .......................................................................................... 36 Figure 5.2 Frequency of Use ......................................................................................... 37 Figure 5.3 Longevity of Use .......................................................................................... 38 Figure 5.4 Delta Route Trip Purpose ............................................................................. 40 Figure 6.1 Commuter Express Route Map .................................................................... 43 Figure 7.1 Regular and Extended Dial-a-Ride Service Area ......................................... 46 Figure 7.2 Frequency of Dial-a-Ride Service Use ......................................................... 47 Figure 7.3 Reason for Dial-a-Ride Trip .......................................................................... 49 Figure 7.4 Dial-a-Ride Longevity of Use ........................................................................ 50 Figure 8.1 Amador Service Route Map ......................................................................... 58 Figure 8.2 Route 1/Sacramento Express Stops in Sacramento .................................... 59 Figure 8.3 Holiday Schedule ......................................................................................... 59 Figure 10.1 SCT/LINK Sticker on RT Bus Stop Sign at 16th & L Streets in Sacramento 79 LIST OF TABLES Table 2.1 Estimated Growth Rates, Galt and Isleton, 2010-2016 ................................. 12 Table 2.2 Study Area Population ................................................................................... 13 Table 2.3 Journey to Work Data .................................................................................... 15 Table 2.4 Recent and Planned Developments .............................................................. 18 Table 3.1 Service Totals, FY 2011/12 to FY 2015/16 .................................................... 26 Table 4.1 Bus Stop Use ............................................................................................... 30 Table 4.2 How Riders travel to/from the Bus Stop ........................................................ 30 Table 4.3 Rider Demographics ...................................................................................... 31 Table 4.4 Highway 99 Express Ridership ...................................................................... 32 Table 4.5 Rider Fare Category ...................................................................................... 33 Table 4.6 Level of Agreement with Statements about Highway 99 Express Service .... 34 Table 5.1 Bus Stop Use ................................................................................................ 37 Table 5.2 How riders travel to/from the bus stop ........................................................... 38 Table 5.3 Rider Demographics ...................................................................................... 39 Table 5.4 Delta Route Ridership Data ........................................................................... 40 Table 5.5 Level of Agreement with Statements about the Delta Route Service ............ 41 Table 6.1 Galt-Sacramento Commuter Express Ridership ............................................ 44 Table 7.1 Rider Fare Category ...................................................................................... 47 Table 7.2 Rider Demographics ...................................................................................... 48 Table 7.3 SCT/LINK Dial-a-Ride vs. Fixed Route Costs, FY 2014/15 ........................... 50 Table 7.4 Dial-a-Ride Ridership, FY 2012/13 to FY 2015/16 ........................................ 50 Table 7.5 Dial-A-Ride Operating Cost Comparison, FY 2014/15 .................................. 51 Table 7.6 SCT/LINK Dial-a-Ride vs. Fixed Route Costs, FY 2015/16 ........................... 51 Table 7.7 Level of Agreement with Statements about the Delta Route Service ............ 52 Table 7.8 Total and Average No Shows, 2014-2016 ..................................................... 52 Table 7.9 No Shows by Month, 2014-2016 ................................................................... 53 Table 7.10 Saturday Usage, 2014-2016 ....................................................................... 53 Table 7.11 Saturday Early Morning and Evening Usage, January 2014 to June 2016 54 Table 8.1 Sacramento Express: Route Times ............................................................... 60 Table 8.2 Current Fare Types and Prices .................................................................... 60 Table 8.3 Route 1 Sacramento Express Ridership ...................................................... 61 Table 9.1 South Sacramento County Annual Unmet Transit Needs Summary, ............ 65 Table 9.2 Summary of 2013 Triennial Performance Audit Recommendations .............. 66 Table 9.3 Summary of 2016 Triennial Performance Audit Recommendations .............. 67 Table 9.4 Current Contractual SCT/LINK Standards and Measures ............................. 68 Table 9.5 Fare Survey ................................................................................................... 72 Table 9.6 Potential Fare Phasing .................................................................................. 74 Table 10.1 How riders found out/learned about the service .......................................... 76 Table 11.1 Operating Cost Assumptions ....................................................................... 85 Table 11.2 Operating Expenses per Vehicle Revenue Hour ......................................... 85 Table 11.3 Annual Vehicle Revenue Hours ................................................................... 85 Table 11.4 Operating Expenses by Route and Totals ................................................... 86 Table 11.5 Capital Expenses ........................................................................................ 86 Table 11.6 SCT/LINK Fleet Replacement Schedule ..................................................... 87 Table 11.7 Revenues Supporting Operating and Capital Expenses ............................. 89 Table
Recommended publications
  • March 2, 2017 TO: El Dorado County Transit
    AGENDA ITEM 1 D Consent Item MEMORANDUM DATE: March 2, 2017 TO: El Dorado County Transit Authority FROM: Brian James, Planning and Marketing Manager SUBJECT: Regional Fare Comparison REQUESTED ACTION: BY MOTION, Receive and File Regional Fare Comparison BACKGROUND The El Dorado County Transit Authority (El Dorado Transit) routinely surveys regional transit operators for current fare and fare policy information. In January 2017, staff conducted research to compile current fare information for seven (7) regional operators. The following offers comparisons of regional fares, categorized by service type. DISCUSSION Local Fixed Routes The following chart reflects local fixed route fares for the transit operators surveyed: One-Way Fares Monthly Pass/Ticket Books General Senior/Disabled Student General Senior/Disabled Student El Dorado Transit $1.50 $0.75 $0.75 $60.00 $30.00 $30.00 Folsom Stage Lines $2.50 $1.25 $1.25 $50.00 $25.00 $25.00 Roseville Transit $1.50 $0.75 $0.75 $58.00 $29.00 $29.00 Placer County Transit $1.25 $0.60 $0.60 $37.50 $18.75 $18.75 Yolobus $2.25 $1.10 $1.10 $93.50 $46.75 $46.75 Yuba-Sutter Transit $1.00 $0.50 $0.50 $30.00 $6.00 $6.00 Amador Transit $2.00 $1.00 $1.00 $100.00 $60.00 $60.00 Sacramento Regional Transit $2.75 $1.35 $1.35 $110.00 $55.00 $55.00 Averages $1.84 $0.91 $0.91 $67.38 $33.81 $33.81 El Dorado County Transit Authority March 2, 2017 Agenda One-way fares for local fixed route services in the region range from $1.00 to $2.75, with half price discounts typically offered for seniors, persons with disabilities per the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and students.
    [Show full text]
  • Smart Location Database Technical Documentation and User Guide
    SMART LOCATION DATABASE TECHNICAL DOCUMENTATION AND USER GUIDE Version 3.0 Updated: June 2021 Authors: Jim Chapman, MSCE, Managing Principal, Urban Design 4 Health, Inc. (UD4H) Eric H. Fox, MScP, Senior Planner, UD4H William Bachman, Ph.D., Senior Analyst, UD4H Lawrence D. Frank, Ph.D., President, UD4H John Thomas, Ph.D., U.S. EPA Office of Community Revitalization Alexis Rourk Reyes, MSCRP, U.S. EPA Office of Community Revitalization About This Report The Smart Location Database is a publicly available data product and service provided by the U.S. EPA Smart Growth Program. This version 3.0 documentation builds on, and updates where needed, the version 2.0 document.1 Urban Design 4 Health, Inc. updated this guide for the project called Updating the EPA GSA Smart Location Database. Acknowledgements Urban Design 4 Health was contracted by the U.S. EPA with support from the General Services Administration’s Center for Urban Development to update the Smart Location Database and this User Guide. As the Project Manager for this study, Jim Chapman supervised the data development and authored this updated user guide. Mr. Eric Fox and Dr. William Bachman led all data acquisition, geoprocessing, and spatial analyses undertaken in the development of version 3.0 of the Smart Location Database and co- authored the user guide through substantive contributions to the methods and information provided. Dr. Larry Frank provided data development input and reviewed the report providing critical input and feedback. The authors would like to acknowledge the guidance, review, and support provided by: • Ruth Kroeger, U.S. General Services Administration • Frank Giblin, U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • March 1, 2018 TO: El Dorado County Transit
    AGENDA ITEM 1 D Consent Item MEMORANDUM DATE: March 1, 2018 TO: El Dorado County Transit Authority FROM: Brian James, Planning and Marketing Manager SUBJECT: Regional Fare Comparison REQUESTED ACTION: BY MOTION, Receive and File Regional Fare Comparison BACKGROUND The El Dorado County Transit Authority (El Dorado Transit) routinely surveys regional transit operators for current fare and fare policy information. In February 2018, staff conducted research to compile current fare information for seven (7) regional operators. The following offers comparisons of regional fares, categorized by service type. DISCUSSION Local Fixed Routes The following chart reflects local fixed route fares for the transit operators surveyed: One-Way Fares Monthly Pass/Ticket Books General Senior/Disabled Student General Senior/Disabled Student El Dorado Transit $1.50 $0.75 $0.75 $60.00 $30.00 $30.00 Folsom Stage Lines $2.50 $1.25 $1.25 $95.00 $50.00 $50.00 Roseville Transit $1.50 $0.75 $0.75 $58.00 $29.00 $29.00 Placer County Transit $1.25 $0.60 $0.60 $37.50 $18.75 $18.75 Yolobus $2.25 $1.10 $1.10 $93.50 $46.75 $46.75 Yuba-Sutter Transit $1.00 $0.50 $0.50 $30.00 $15.00 $15.00 Amador Transit $2.00 $1.00 $1.00 $100.00 $60.00 $60.00 Sacramento Regional Transit $2.75 $1.35 $1.35 $110.00 $55.00 $20.00 Averages $1.84 $0.91 $0.91 $73.00 $38.06 $33.69 One-way fares for local fixed route services in the region range from $1.00 to $2.75, with half price discounts typically offered for seniors, persons with disabilities per the Americans with El Dorado County Transit Authority March 1, 2018 Agenda Disabilities Act (ADA) and students.
    [Show full text]
  • Yolo County Transportation District to Encourage Participation in the Meetings of the Board of Directors
    AGENDA (530) 661-0816 NOTICE If requested, this agenda can be made available in appropriate alternative formats to persons with a disability, as required by Section 202 of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 and the Federal Rules and Regulations adopted in implementation thereof. Persons seeking an alternative format should contact Kathy Souza, Executive Assistant, for further information. In addition, a person with a disability who requires a modification or accommodation, including auxiliary aids or services, in order to participate in a public meeting should telephone or otherwise contact Kathy Souza as soon as possible and preferably at least 24 hours prior to the meeting. Kathy Souza may be reached at telephone number (530) 661-0816 or at the following address: 350 Industrial Way, Woodland, CA 95776. It is the policy of the Board of Directors of the Yolo County Transportation District to encourage participation in the meetings of the Board of Directors. At each open meeting, members of the public shall be provided with an opportunity to directly address the Board on items of interest to the public that are within the subject matter jurisdiction of the Board of Directors. Please fill out a speaker card and give it to the Board Clerk if you wish to address the Board. Speaker cards are provided on a table by the entrance to the meeting room. Depending on the length of the agenda and number of speakers who filled out and submitted cards, the Board Chair reserves the right to limit a public speaker’s time to no more than three (3) minutes, or less, per agenda item.
    [Show full text]
  • EL DORADO COUNTY TRANSIT AUTHORITY AGENDA Regular Meeting
    Patty Borelli, Chairperson John Hidahl Councilmember Shiva Frentzen, Board of Supervisors, City of Placerville Vice Chairperson District I Board of Supervisors Trisha Wilkins, Mindy Jackson, District II Brian Veerkamp Councilmember Executive Director Board of Supervisors City of Placerville District II County of El Dorado Planning Commission Hearing Room 2850 Fairlane Court, Bldg. C Thursday, March 2, 2017 1:00 PM EL DORADO COUNTY TRANSIT AUTHORITY AGENDA Regular Meeting Chairperson: Patty Borelli, City of Placerville Councilmember Vice Chairperson: Shiva Frentzen, County of El Dorado Supervisor, District II Directors: John Hidahl, County of El Dorado Supervisor, District I Trisha Wilkins, City of Placerville Councilmember Brian Veerkamp, County of El Dorado Supervisor, District III • Wendy Thomas, Alternate for City Councilmembers • Michael Ranalli, Alternate for Board of Supervisors, District IV Executive Director: Mindy Jackson CALL TO ORDER AND CEREMONIAL ITEMS PAGE A. Proclamation of Retiring Transit Driver Gladys Neeley 5 B. Oath of Office 7 PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG ROLL CALL ADOPTION OF AGENDA AND APPROVAL OF CONSENT CALENDAR The Board may make any necessary additions, deletions or corrections to the agenda including moving items to or from the Consent Calendar and adopt the agenda with one single vote. A Board member may request an item to be removed from the Consent Calendar for discussion and possible action, and the item will be moved from Consent and heard as a separate item. Any member of the public may ask to address an item on the Consent Calendar prior to Board action. PUBLIC COMMENT At this time, any person may comment on any item that is not on the agenda.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Transportation Modernization, Improvement, and Service Enhancement Account Program Annual Legislative Report Fiscal Year 2017–18
    Public Transportation Modernization, Improvement, and Service Enhancement Account Program Annual Legislative Report Fiscal Year 2017–18 Report to the Legislature 2018 [This page intentionally left blank.] Table of Contents Executive Summary ................................................................................................................... 2 Background ................................................................................................................................ 3 Statutory Reference and Purpose ........................................................................................ 3 Program Background ........................................................................................................... 3 Program Status/Program Accomplishments ............................................................................... 4 Intercity Rail Improvement Program Projects ........................................................................ 4-10 Table 1: Open Intercity Rail Improvement Program Projects ................................................ 8 Table 2: Completed/Closed Intercity Rail Improvement Program Projects ....................... 9-10 Mass Transportation Program Proposition 1B Bond Fund .........................................................10 Conclusion ................................................................................................................................11 Appendix A. Statutory Reporting Reference .............................................................................12
    [Show full text]
  • Transportation
    Chapter 16—Transportation 16.1 Introduction This chapter describes the existing conditions (environmental and regulatory) and assesses the potential transportation impacts of the 2020 Metropolitan Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy (proposed MTP/SCS). Where necessary and feasible, mitigation measures are identified to reduce these impacts. The information presented in this chapter is based on review of existing information and is regional in scope. Data, analysis, and findings provided in this chapter were considered and prepared at a programmatic level. In response to the Notice of Preparation (NOP), SACOG received several comments related to transportation from Sierra Club (Placer County), Sacramento Metropolitan Air Quality Management District (SMAQMD), ECOS, Sierra Club (Placer County), and Delta Protection Commission. The commenters expressed that the Draft EIR should consider the following: . Different transportation improvements for Placer County, . Relationship between planned transportation improvements and the goals of the MTP/SCS, . Increased transit service, . Induced vehicle miles traveled, . Multiple lanes as a part of consideration of managed lanes, . Increased funding for active transportation projects, . Shared modeling with member jurisdictions, . Relationship between vehicle miles traveled (VMT) and greenhouse gases (GHG), . Equity and environmental justice concerns related to transit access, . VMT impacts, and . Delta Trail Master Plan. The CEQA Guidelines note that comments received during the NOP scoping process can be helpful in “identifying the range of actions, alternatives, mitigation measures, and significant effects to be analyzed in depth in an EIR and in eliminating from detailed study issues found not to be important.” (CEQA Guidelines Section 15083.) Neither the CEQA Guidelines nor Statutes require a lead agency to respond directly to comments received in response to the NOP, but they do require they be considered.
    [Show full text]
  • Western El Dorado County 2008 Short Range Transit Plan
    Western El Dorado County 2008 Short Range Transit Plan Final Report Prepared for the El Dorado County Transportation Commission, and El Dorado County Transit Authority Prepared by LSC Transportation Consultants, Inc. TRANSPORTATION CONSULTANTS, INC. Western El Dorado County 2008 Short Range Transit Plan Prepared for the El Dorado County Transportation Commission 2828 Easy Street, Suite 1 Placerville, California 95667 (530) 642-5262 and the El Dorado County Transit Authority 6565 Commerce Way Diamond Springs, California 95619 (530) 642-5383 Prepared by LSC Transportation Consultants, Inc. 2690 Lake Forest Road, Suite C P.O. Box 5875 Tahoe City, California 96145 (530) 583-4053 June 18, 2008 LSC 077530 Executive Summary The El Dorado County Transportation Commission (EDCTC) retained LSC Transportation Consultants, Inc. to prepare a 5-Year Short Range Transit Plan to improve and enhance transit services for Fiscal Years (FY) 2008/09 to 2012/13, through June 30, 2013. This plan document first presents and reviews the characteristics of the study area, including demographic factors. A thorough review of existing land use and transportation plans is then presented. The operating history of transit services is reviewed, and demand for transit services in the study area evaluated. Finally, a detailed, financially constrained Short Range Transit Plan is presented for the future improvement in El Dorado County Transit Authority (EDCTA) services. Study Area This study considers the portion of El Dorado County to the west of the Sierra Crest. Population of the area in 2006 is estimated based on U.S. Census data as 144,000. Of this total, 17 percent was elderly (age 60 or above), 2.1 percent was mobility-limited, 6.8 percent were low-income, while 2.8 percent of households did not own a private vehicle.
    [Show full text]
  • Attachment A
    ATTACHMENT A Agency State 128 Business Council MA 9 Town Transit CT AAATA MI Aberdeen Ride Line SD ABQ RIDE NM AC Transit CA Access Services CA Addison County Transit Resources VT Advance Transit VT Airport (MAC) MN Airport Valet Express CA Alachua County Regional Transit System FL Albany Transit System GA Albany Transit System OR Alexandria Transit Company (DASH) VA Alhambra Community Transit CA Allegany County Transit MD Allen County Regional Transit Authority OH Altamont Commuter Express CA Amador Transit CA Amarillo City Transit TX Amtrak AMTRAN PA Anaheim Resort Transportation CA Anchorage People Mover AK Annapolis Transit MD Annett Bus Lines Anoka County MN Antelope Valley Transit Authority CA Arcata & Mad River Transit System CA Area Transportation Authority of North Central PA PA Areawide Community Transportation System (ACTS) AL Arlington Transit VA Asheville Redefines Transit NC Ashland Bus System KY Atascadero Transit / North County Shuttle CA Athens Public Transit OH Athens Transit GA Atlanta Streetcar GA Atlantic Station Shuttle GA Atomic City Transit NM Auburn Transit (Placer County Department of Public Works) CA Augusta Public Transit GA Avila Trolley CA Baker City Community Connection OR Banning Transit CA Barstow Area Transit CA Bart Bus WI Basin Transit Service OR Battle Creek Transit MI Bay Area Rapid Transit CA Bay Area Transportation Authority MI Bay Metro MI Bay State Cruise Company MA Bay Town Trolley FL Baylink CA BCTA (Beaver County Transit Authority) PA BE Line CA Beach Cities Transit - City of Redondo Beach (BCT)
    [Show full text]
  • San Joaquins-San Francisco-Oakland-Southern
    SAN JOAQUINSSM SAN JOAQUINSSM Effective May 20, 2019 Effective May 20, 2019 SAN FRANCISCO / OAKLAND - SACRAMENTO SAN FRANCISCO / OAKLAND - SACRAMENTO STOCKTON - MERCED - FRESNO STOCKTON - MERCED - FRESNO BAKERSFIELD - SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA BAKERSFIELD - SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA and intermediate stations and intermediate stations Puede acceder al sitio completo de Amtrak.com Puede acceder al sitio completo de Amtrak.com en español ingresando a espanol.amtrak.com. en español ingresando a espanol.amtrak.com. Hay agentes en línea que hablan español llamando al Hay agentes en línea que hablan español llamando al 1-800-USA-RAIL y presionando 6 cuando se le indique. 1-800-USA-RAIL y presionando 6 cuando se le indique. Visit: AmtrakSanJoaquins.com Visit: AmtrakSanJoaquins.com www.amtrak.com www.amtrak.com Amtrak is a registered service mark of the National Railroad Passenger Corporation. Amtrak is a registered service mark of the National Railroad Passenger Corporation. National Railroad Passenger Corporation, One Massachusetts Ave. N.W., Washington, DC 20001. National Railroad Passenger Corporation, One Massachusetts Ave. N.W., Washington, DC 20001. NRPC Form W33–5/20/19. Schedules subject to change without notice. NRPC Form W33–5/20/19. Schedules subject to change without notice. page 2 SAN JOAQUINS - Southbound Train Number4 5872 702 710 712 714 716 704 718 Normal Days of Operation4 Daily Daily Daily Daily Daily Daily Daily Daily R y R y R y R y R y R y R y b R On Board Service4 l åb l åb l åb l åb l åb l åb l åb Mile Symbol 6 San Francisco, CA –Fisherman’s Wharf, Pier 39 >v Dp 3b4 15P –Shopping Center, 835 Market Street >v 3bR4 25P –Financial Dist., Hyatt Regency >v 3bR4 40P –Transbay Temporary Terminal mC ∑w- q bl7 00A bl9 00A bl11 00A bl1 00P 3blR4 40P Emeryville, CA mC ∑w- Ar bl7 30A bl9 30A bl11 30A bl1 30P 3bl5 20P OAKLAND, CA–Jack London Sq.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Transit in Sacramento
    Public Transit in Sacramento Jeffrey Damon, AICP Director, Long Range Planning Sacramento Regional Transit District April 27, 2016 Regional Overview • What is “Transit” in Sacramento? Bus Service: RT, Amador Transit, El Dorado Transit, e-tran, Folsom Stage Line, Placer County Transit, Placer Co., Roseville Transit, San Joaquin Regional Transit, South County Transit, UniTrans, Yolobus and Yuba-Sutter Transit Light Rail: Blue Line, Gold Line and Green Line Paratransit Service: ADA and medical Commuter Rail: Capitol Corridor Intercity Rail: Amtrak and San Joaquins • In the SACOG region, transit accounts for about 1.2 percent of all trips and 2.6 percent of commute trips (not including paratransit services) Population & Unlinked Transit Trips Tampa 1.3 million Sacramento 1.4 million 15 million 26 million Portland 1.4 Salt Lake City 1.8 million million 103 million 42 million Vancouver 2.5 million San Diego 3.2 million 239 millionChris Collacot 85 million Aaron Chang Sacramento Regional Transit District • 1800’s: Horse Drawn • 2004: Entire Bus Fleet CNG- • 1906-1943: PG&E Trolleys Powered • 1943-1955: Sacramento City • 2005: Extend Gold Line to Lines Operates Streetcars Folsom (10.7 Miles) and Buses • 2006: Extend Gold Line to • 1955-1973: Sacramento Sacramento Valley Station (0.5 Transit Authority Operates Miles) Buses (only) • 2012: Green Line to the River • 1973: Sacramento Regional District Light Rail Extension Transit District Established Opens (1.1 Miles) • 1987: Light Rail Service • 2015: Blue Line to Cosumnes Starts (18.3 Miles) River
    [Show full text]
  • 11-3-16 SJ JPA Agenda Packet
    Supervisor John Pedrozo, Chair, Merced County Alternate Rodrigo Espinoza, City of Livingston Supervisor Henry Perea, Vice-Chair, Fresno County Alternate Nathan Magsig, City of Clovis Councilmember Don Tatzin, Vice-Chair, City of Lafayette Alternate Federal Glover, Contra Costa County Councilmember Patrick Hume, City of Elk Grove Alternate Don Nottoli, Sacramento County Supervisor Vito Chiesa, Stanislaus County Alternate Richard O’Brien, City of Riverbank Supervisor Scott Haggerty, Alameda County Alternate Tom Blalock, BART Supervisor Allen Ishida, Tulare County Alternate Bob Link, City of Visalia Councilmember Bob Johnson, City of Lodi Alternate Mike Maciel, City of Tracy Supervisor Doug Verboon, Kings County Alternate Justin Mendes, City of Hanford Supervisor Brett Frazier, Madera County Alternate Andrew Madellin, City of Madera AGENDA November 3, 2016 – 2:00 PM Merced County Board of Supervisors Chambers (3rd Floor) 2222 M Street, Merced CA This Agenda shall be made available upon request in alternative formats to persons with a disability, as required by the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (42 U.S.C. § 12132) and the Ralph M. Brown Act (California Government Code § 54954.2). Persons requesting a disability related modification or accommodation in order to participate in the meeting should contact San Joaquin Regional Rail Commission staff, at 209-944-6220, during regular business hours, at least twenty-four hours prior to the time of the meeting. All proceedings before the Authority are conducted in English. Any writings or documents provided to a majority of the Authority regarding any item on this agenda will be made available for public inspection at the offices of the San Joaquin Regional Rail Commission located at 949 E.
    [Show full text]