Socotra: Rapid Multi-Cluster Assessment Initial Findings | 30 November 2015
Overview
Cyclones Chapala and Megh made landfall in Socotra Island on 2 November and 8 November respectively. The storms claimed the lives of 26 people and caused significant damage to the island’s infrastructure. Socotra Governorate is a small archipelago of four islands that comprise the two administrative districts - Hidaybu and Qulensya and Wa Abd Al Kuri in the Indian Ocean. The total population is 61,4381. According to the 2016 Humanitarian Needs Overview, 14,745 people from Socotra are in need of some form of humanitarian assistance which is nearly 24% of Socotra’s population. A rapid needs assessment and implementation of the IOM Displacement Tracking Matrix (DTM)2 Area Assessments were conducted in order to identify priority needs and to inform the displacement situation. The Area Assessment can be found in Annex: Area Assessment.3 The rapid needs assessment the teams surveyed 97 key informants (21% female) from the two districts (Annex: Respondent Profiles). The following are the key findings: The top three identified needs were: 1) Shelter, Basic Supplies, and community structures; 2) Schools and Learning; 3) Safe Water, sanitation and hygiene. As of 26 November, IOM DTM reported 4,226 families had returned following their preemptive displacement, while IOM estimates that 3,322 families remain displaced in 8 districts in Shabwah, Hadramout and Socotra who were accommodated in 50 distinct locations. Socotra Island suffered the largest impact of the cyclones, IOM reported approximately 2,210 displaced households in 30 locations needing assistance– 1,430 households in 11 locations for Hidaybu district and 780 households in 19 Locations for Qulensya Wa Abd Al Kur district. Socotra (n=97) Hidaybu (n=89) Qulensya Wa Males (n=77) Females Priority Abd Al Kuri (n=20) (n=8) 1 Shelter, Basic Transportation Schools and Shelter, Basic Shelter, Basic Supplies, and Supplies, and (63%) learning Supplies, and community community (25%) community structures (28%) structures structures (26%) (50% ) IOM IOM None CSSW, IOM Operational Presence UNICEF 2 Schools and Schools and Safe water, Safe water, Schools and learning (23%) learning (24%) sanitation and sanitation and learning hygiene (75%) hygiene (40% ) (25%) CSSW, UNICEF CSSW, UNICEF None None CSSW, Operational Presence UNICEF 3 Safe water, Safe water, Health and Shelter, Basic Safe Water, sanitation and sanitation and family (63%) Supplies, and Sanitation, hygiene (27%) hygiene (28%) Community and Hygiene Structures (20%) (19%) None None UNICEF, IOM None Operational WHO Presence
1 Yemeni Central Statistics Office’s Population Projections for 2015. 2 IOM DTM has conducted area assessments across all affected areas and so the information is not limited to Socotra Island. 3 IOM implements the Area Assessments under the framework of the Task Force for Population Movement (TFPM). The purpose of the Area Assessment is to ensure a comprehensive approach to population tracking as displacement remains significant, complex and fluid within the country.
www.unocha.org The mission of the United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA) is to mobilize and coordinate effective and principled humanitarian action in partnership with national and international actors. Coordination Saves Lives Socotra Rapid Assessment | Initial Findings | 30 November 2015 | 2
While the initial response has been ongoing, this report serves to inform future response planning. IOM have already demonstrated the use of initial assessment findings in their response by having the assessment team debrief the IOM Emergency Humanitarian Assistance staff deployed to inform a targeted response. Methodology
Following preparation and coordination, IOM deployed a rapid assessment team of 20 locally employed enumerators on the 12th November, 2015. Implemented in parallel to the MIRA, IOM conducted the Area Assessment within the framework of the TFPM4. The addition of this assessment allowed for the identification of displaced populations at the location level while capturing basic sex and age disaggregated data and the shelter types occupied.
The two districts of Hidaybu and Qulensya Wa Abd Al Kuri were divided into 10 sub districts - Arsal, Hala, Arrehn, Hidaybu, Noghr, Dehemdh, Dexem, Qulencia, Abd Kuri, and Hghr. Within these sub-districts further locations were identified. The 20 enumerators divided into two teams of 10 to cover the areas where access was allowed. The islands of Abd al Kuri, Samha, Darsa in Qulensya Wa Abd Al Kuri district were difficult to access, the rapid assessment teams followed up with phone calls and residences were reported to have pre- emptively evacuated the islands before the cyclones. Further to this, difficulties in obtaining fuel and maintaining a consistent power and internet source led to difficulties in data entry and delayed the process. Findings
The 97 key informants surveyed included IDPs, host community members, women, health workers, teachers, farmers, shepherds, students, nurses, soldiers, shop keepers, fishers, and local community leaders (including one local council member). See annexes for a profile of respondents. Displacement All 97 respondents reported that people had to leave their home. 51% respondents reported that displaced persons went to schools, caves, mosques, and government buildings. Approximately 43% reported that every displaced person has returned back to their respective communities. 35% report that very few people have returned back to their homes. While the numbers of returnees are not specific to Socotra, as of 26 November, IOM reported 4,226 families had returned following their preemptive displacement, while IOM estimates that 3,322 families remain displaced in 8 districts and are accommodated in 50 distinct locations. Of the affected areas, Socotra suffered significant damage, with approximately 2,210 displaced households in 30 locations needing assistance– 1,430 households in 11 locations in Hidaybu district and 780 households in 19 Locations for Qulensya Wa Abd Al Kur district (Annex 2: Identified IDP populated locations by district). Priority needs The following sections provide more detail on each priority by Governorate, district and sex. The tables in each section summarize how top priority choices were allocated per district. The most frequently cited categories are coloured red.
Priority Needs in Socotra (n=97) The three priorities respondents overall were ‘Shelter, Basic Supplies, and community structures’, ‘Schools and learning’, and ‘WASH’. Priority #1 - Shelter, basic supplies, and community structures: Nearly all respondents (97%) said that the availability and quality of basic supplies was a serious problem. Regarding shelter, 90% of respondents answered that it was serious problem. The main shelter concerns are that the cyclone caused damage to homes rendering them inhabitable (71%); people are still living in damaged homes (56%); building materials to repair shelters are unavailable (57%) or too expensive (81%). Before the
4 The information is captured through an extensive network of key informants and partner agencies. The assessments are implemented in repetitive rounds to provide regular and comprehensive updates for the whole of Yemen. Through the Area Assessments the enumerators identify populated locations capturing the x and y coordinates (for rural areas this would be a village and for urban areas a neighborhood), the type of shelter occupied, basic sex and age disaggregated data as well as returnee populations at a district level. The cyclical approach for the assessments provide the opportunity for self-validation in displacement locations and figures as the process repeats.
Socotra Rapid Assessment | Initial Findings | 30 November 2015 | 3
cyclones the majority of people lived in their own houses or apartments (55; 57%); improvised shelter (26%); and tents (20%). However, due to the cyclones, had to resort to tent (58%); public buildings (25%); and caves or other natural shelters (23%). 56% of respondents indicated that movement was a problem, particularly in Qulensya Wa Abd Al Kuri. Priority #2 - Schools and learning: 93% respondents said schools and learning is a serious problem because children are not in school or are not getting a good enough education. Respondents indicated that most school aged children attended school before the cyclone (90%). The children that are least likely to attend school are those from lower socio-economic status (84%) and children with disabilities (58%). Respondents noted that girls (56%) were least likely to attend school than boys (34%). Priority #3 - Safe water, sanitation, and hygiene: 92% of respondents indicated that there is a serious problem because people do not have enough water that is safe for drinking, cooking, or personal hygiene. The main sources of water reported are the government or community water network (49%); unprotected open wells (39%); unprotected spring (33%); and traditional water sellers or water trucks (29%). The main reasons why people do not have enough water that respondents reported were they must travel long distances to collect water (61%), water trucks no longer go to the area (45%), and the price of water is too expensive (33%). The majority of respondents also regard safe and easy access to clean toilets (68%) and ability to keep clean (82%) as serious problems in their communities.
Priority Needs in Hidaybu (n=89) The top three priority needs reflect those above because the majority of respondents from this governorate: Priority #1 -Shelter, basic supplies, and community structures: Nearly all respondents answered that basic items were a serious problem (97%) because they were not available or of poor quality. Regarding shelter, 89% respondents reported there is a serious problem in their community because people do not have good enough places to live. The top four main concerns with meeting shelter needs are that 1) building materials are too expensive to repair shelters (81%); homes are damaged and cannot be lived in (76%); people are living in damaged homes (54%); and that materials to repair shelters are not available. Respondents reported that before the cyclones people were living in their own houses/apartments (56%); improvised shelter (28%); tents (21%); or house/apartment of another (17%). After the cyclones, respondents answered that more people were living in tents (62%); caves or natural shelters (20%); and public buildings (27%); and less in their own houses/apartments (29%) and improvised shelters (19%). However, majority of respondents (65%) did not think movement was a serious problem. Priority #2 - Schools and Learning: 92% respondents indicated that schools and learning is a problem. While 69% of respondents reported that most school-aged children go to school during the year. Regarding those who are least likely to attend school, 84% respondents indicated that children from poor families and 58 (65%) reported children with disabilities were least likely. Respondents also indicated that girls (56%) were less likely to attend school than boys (35%). Priority #3 - Safe water, sanitation and hygiene: 81 respondents (91%) reported people in their community do not have enough safe water. Respondents indicated that the reasons for not enough water were the long distance to collect water ( 60%), water trucks no longer go to the area (48%), and the price of water is too expensive ( 35%). The main sources of water reported were the government or community water network (54%), unprotected open wells (34%), unprotected springs (29%) and traditional water sellers or water trucks (31%). 67% of respondents considered easy and safe access to clean toilets as a serious problem in their community, and 82% of respondents reported that it is difficult to keep clean in the community.
Priority Needs in Qulensya Wa Abd Al Kuri (n=8) Respondents ranked, ‘Transportation’, ‘Safe water, sanitation and hygiene’, and ‘Health and family’ as the top three priority needs: Priority #1 -Transportation: 71% of respondents cited transportation as a major problem in the district; as 75% noted that people can no longer reach important community structures. Half of respondents answered that people could not freely travel because of the inadequate/damaged transportation network (50%) and high price of transportation (25%). The main reported consequences due to the restricted movement are less access to health (75%), humanitarian assistance (75%); water (38%); and livelihood activities (38%). The only female respondent (12.5 %) deemed Education as priority #1. Priority #2 - Safe water, sanitation and hygiene: All respondents indicated that there was a shortage of water that is safe. The long distance to collect water was the primary reason reported for the shortage safe water (75%). Respondents indicated that the main sources of water are unprotected springs (75%) and surface water (38%). The majority of respondents (75%) indicated that there is a serious problem in
Socotra Rapid Assessment | Initial Findings | 30 November 2015 | 4
their communities because people do not have easy and safe access to clean toilets and 88% of respondents indicated that hygiene was a serious problem. Priority #3 – Health and family: Seven respondents (88%) indicated that there was a serious problem in their community because people are injured, sick, or have disabilities. The top three health concerns people most commonly suffer from respondents are gastrointestinal (88%), colds/respiratory illness (63%), and malnutrition (50%). All respondents indicated that access to health care is a serious problem and 6 (75%) indicated that people could not care for family members who cannot care for them.
Priority needs among males (n=77) The top three priorities reported among males were Schools and learning (25%), Safe water, sanitation and hygiene (25%), and Shelter, Basic Supplies, and Community Structures (19%). The prioritization of schools and learning may be because teachers (21%) and students (6%) were the largest group sampled.
Priority needs among females (n=20) The top three priorities from females were ‘shelter, basic supplies, and community structures; (50%), ‘schools and learning’ (40%), and ‘Safe Water, Sanitation, and Hygiene’ (20%).
Socotra Rapid Assessment | Initial Findings | 30 November 2015 | 5
Priority 1 Ranking
Grand Hidaybu (n=89) Qulensya Wa Abd Al Total Kuri (n=8) (n=97) Priorities Female Male Female Male Shelter, Basic Supplies, and Community Structures 10 (53%) 15 (21%) - - 25 (26%) Schools and Learning 4 (21%) 18 (26%) 1 (100%) 1 (14%) 24 (25%) Livelihoods 15 (21%) - - 15 (15%) Safe Water, Sanitation and Hygiene 3 (16%) 9 (13%) - - 12 (12%) Health and Family 1 (5%) 6 (9%) - 1 (14%) 8 ((8%) Transportation - - 5 (71%) 5 (5%) Food and Nutrition 1 (5%) 4 (6%) - - 5 (5%) Boats - 2 (3%) - - 2 (2%) Electricity - 1 (1%) - - 1 (1%)
Priority 2 Ranking Grand Qulensya Wa Abd Al Total Hidaybu (n=88)5 Kuri (n=8) (n=96) Priorities Female Male Female Male Schools and Learning 8 (42%) 13 (19%) 1 (14%) 22 (23%) Safe Water, Sanitation and Hygiene 1 (5%) 14 (20%) 1 (100%) 5 (71%) 21 (22%) Health and Family 5 (26%) 12 (17%) 1 (14%) 18 (19%) Shelter, Basic Supplies, and Community Structures 4 (21%) 13 (19%) 17 (18%) Livelihoods 1 (5%) 8 (12%) 9 (9%) Food and Nutrition 8 (12%) 8 (8%) Boats 1 (1%) 1 (1%)
Priority 3 Ranking Grand Qulensya Wa Abd Al Total Hidaybu (n=80) Kuri (8) (n=88) Priorities Female Male Female Male Safe Water, Sanitation, and Hygiene 4 (31%) 21 (31%) 1 (14%) 26 (30%) Shelter, Basic Supplies, and Community Structures 3 (23%) 14 (21%) 1 (100%) 1 (14%) 19 (22%) Health and Family 2 (15%) 8 (12%) 5 (71%) 15 (17%) Schools and Learning 1 (8%) 10 (15%) 11 (13%) Food and Nutrition 2 (15%) 5 (7%) 7 (8%) Livelihoods 1 (8%) 6 (9%) 7 (8%) Electricity 2 (3%) 2 (2%) Safety 1 (1%) 1 (1%)
5n=88 as one respondent had the first priority repeated.
Socotra Rapid Assessment | Initial Findings | 30 November 2015 | 6
Overview of serious problems by District
The table below summarizes whether a majority of respondents in a district identified a given issue as a “serious problem”. The last rows provide the total number of serious problems identified, providing an indirect measure of the relative level of need across different sectors. Issues identified as serious problems below could also benefit from interventions, although partners are encouraged first to allocate planning and resources to meet the priority needs identified above.
Serious problem? Hidaybu (n=) N Qulensya Wa Abd Al Kuri N (n=) Safe water Yes 81 Yes 8 Toilets Yes 60 Yes 6 Cleanliness Yes 73 Yes 7 Food Yes 81 Yes 7 Malnutrition Yes 82 Yes 7 Illness and injury Yes 76 Yes 7 Adequate healthcare Yes 84 Yes 8 Care for family Yes 48 Yes 6 members Family separation No 37 No 6 People alone Yes 63 No 6 Shelter Yes 79 Yes 8 Essential items Yes 86 Yes 8 Reach community Yes 48 Yes 6 structures Travel to No 58 Yes* 4 neighbouring areas Education Yes 82 Yes 8 Upset, sad, angry Yes 62 Yes 7 Humiliation, No 64 No 8 disrespect Safety No 61 No 5 Violation of dignity No 80 No 7 Justice, rights Yes 45 Yes 5 awareness Money, resources Yes 87 Yes 8 Too much free time Yes 82 Yes 8 Information Yes 71 Yes 8 Total 18 18
Response
IOM teams have continued to work on the Island to provide direct assistance to the most affected communities. On the 28th Nov, additional IOM staff were deployed to the island with further resources to respond and bolster coordination and communication with IOMs Aden sub-office. On arrival the IOM Emergency Humanitarian Assistance staff met and debriefed with the teams conducting the MIRA to inform a targeted response based on the information collected through the assessments.Several of the enumerators joined the IOM distrubtions to support in benificery registration and while several of the key infomrants supported with community relations.
Partners who are currently working in Socotra are as follows:
Socotra Rapid Assessment | Initial Findings | 30 November 2015 | 7
Agency Type of Agency Cluster CSSW NGO Education UNICEF UN agency Education YDN NGO Early Recovery UNICEF UN agency Health WHO UN agency Health UNHCR UN agency Protection
Socotra Rapid Assessment | Initial Findings | 30 November 2015 | 8
Annex: Governorate profile
National Socotra Hidaybu Qulensya Wa Abd Al Kuri Population1 26,6964,015 61,438 47,437 14,001 Area (km2) 527,970 5490 2,728.6 2,761.4 Density 50 11.2 17.38 5.07 (persons/km2)
Annex: Respondent profile
Count of Key informant gender Column Labels Qulensya Wa Abd Al Grand Row Labels Hidaybu Kuri Total Female 19 1 20 Health worker 3 3 Host community 1 1 Other (please specify) 9 9 Farmer 1 1 Housewife 4 4 Nurse 2 2 Student 1 1 Volunteer Teacher 1 1 Teacher 7 7 Male 70 7 77 Community leader (sheikh, imam, etc.) 13 1 14 Health worker 3 1 4 Host community 2 2 Other (please specify) 35 3 38 College Graduate 1 1 Culture Officer 1 1 Engineer 1 1 Farmer 1 1 Fisherman 15 1 16 Housewife 2 2 Local Council Member 1 1 Police 2 2 Shepherd 3 2 5 Soldier 2 2 Student 5 5 Tour Guide 1 1 Shop owner / market worker 1 1 2 Teacher 16 1 17 Grand Total 89 8 97
Socotra Rapid Assessment | Initial Findings | 30 November 2015 | 9
Annex: Identified IDP populated locations by District:
Assessed District Location Name Location Name -Arabic Location Pcode # HHs per Location Accessibility6 Yes, team can go 70 3201211772 ارسل Hidaybu Arsal Yes, team can go 120 3201214942 دفعرهو Hidaybu Dafarho No, team cannot go 23 3201216772 دروحح Hidaybu Darwhah Yes, team can go 86 3201211362 دصتمو Hidaybu Dastamo Yes, team can go 273 3201210011 حديبــو Hidaybu Houdaibo No, team cannot go 10 3201211582 معابهر Hidaybu Mabher Yes, team can go 150 3201211342 قاضب Hidaybu Qadheb Yes, team can go 20 3201214292 رقله Hidaybu Raqlah Yes, team can go 422 3201214102 سرهين Hidaybu Sarhein No, team cannot go 156 3201214772 ستوره Hidaybu Saturha Yes, team can go 100 3201214922 زاحق Hidaybu Zaheq Total IDP Caseload by District 1430 Assessed District Location Name Location Name -Arabic Location Pcode # HHs per Location Accessibility Yes, team can go 23 3202211242 عكرهر Qulensya Wa Abd Al Kuri Acrahar Partial access 147 3202211062 بيت عيسى Qulensya Wa Abd Al Kuri Bait Eisa Yes, team can go 37 3202211812 باته Qulensya Wa Abd Al Kuri Batah Yes, team can go 187 3202210011 قلنسيه Qulensya Wa Abd Al Kuri Glnsysa Yes, team can go 13 3202211162 حمروه شطهي Qulensya Wa Abd Al Kuri Hamrowah Shat'hey Yes, team can go 17 3202211632 حصالنه Qulensya Wa Abd Al Kuri Hasalenah Yes, team can go 22 3202211102 جؤوه Qulensya Wa Abd Al Kuri Joawah Yes, team can go 27 3202211222 لوحص Qulensya Wa Abd Al Kuri Lawhas Yes, team can go 18 3202211022 معارقه Qulensya Wa Abd Al Kuri Mareqah Yes, team can go 7 3202211292 مصالف Qulensya Wa Abd Al Kuri Masalef Yes, team can go 29 3202211362 قبهن Qulensya Wa Abd Al Kuri Qabhan Yes, team can go 41 3202211962 قبهو قدامه Qulensya Wa Abd Al Kuri Qabo Qudamah Yes, team can go 21 3202211462 قيسو Qulensya Wa Abd Al Kuri Qaiso Yes, team can go 90 3202221062 صالله Qulensya Wa Abd Al Kuri Salalah Partial access 18 3202240242 جزيرة سمحه Qulensya Wa Abd Al Kuri Samhah Island Yes, team can go 24 3202212022 تمحك Qulensya Wa Abd Al Kuri Tamhuk Yes, team can go 37 3202211662 توحك Qulensya Wa Abd Al Kuri Tawhak Yes, team can go 22 3201213872 رقابنه Qulensya Wa Abd Al Kuri Raqabenah Total IDP Caseload by District 780
6 Accessibitly refers to the ability of the IOM team to physically conduct the DTM area asessments or if they would have to collect data over the phone.
Socotra Rapid Assessment | Initial Findings | 30 November 2015 | 10
Yemen AD1 BASELINE DISPLACEMENT AREA (District) F PROFILE FORM QUESTIONNAIRE │ Version: 3.0 Displacement Tracking Matrix (DTM) │ International Organization for Migration (IOM)
Type of Face-to-face interview Date of Assessment d d - m m - y y y y interview Phone call Both
Enumerator Supervisor Gov. District _PCODE
If Key informant agrees please provide name. Contact will be used for follow up assessment on IDP conditions and needs.
For Column C. Type use: 1.NGO/Humanitarian Aid Worker; 2.Community Based Organization Leader; 3.Community Leader male; 4. Health Worker 5. Religious leaders; 6.Teachers; 7. Government of Yemen official; 8. Military Commander; 9. Social Worker; 10. Group Leader of IDP’s; 11. Executive Unit 12. Other, please specify in contact column. NAME Type Sex Contact Details if informant agrees, if not mark XX and state the type M/F (Phone or Address) and sex only A B C D E
1
2
3
4
5
6
A. DISPLACEMENT ORIGINATED FROM THIS DISTRICT
1. Are there households who left the District and have not returned yet? 1.Yes 2.No 3.DK
2. If yes, where did majority of them go? Within the district Within the Gov. Others Gov. Out of Yemen One response Don’t Know
3. When did the majority go (one response) 2014 and before 2015
4. Are there households/individuals from this District who left and have already returned to their habitual place of 1.Yes 2.No 3.DK 5. # HH residence? (for the 2015 crisis)
6. Specify location name (use the location list) of the 3 main location of return (2015 crisis)
1. # HH
2. # HH
3. # HH
Socotra Rapid Assessment | Initial Findings | 30 November 2015 | 11
B. DISPLACEMENT IN THE DISTRICT 1. Are there displaced households in the District (IDP)? 1. Yes 2. No 2. If Yes, what is the Approx. 2.2 # of estimated number of 2.1. # of HH Individuals current IDP population? Exact 3. Arrival of IDPs into / within this District? (estimate the # number or % percent of total number by time period) 2014 and before 2015 1.Yes 2.No 3.DK 1.Yes 2.No 3.DK # HH # HH # IND # IND % of Total % of Total 1. Same District 1. Same District 2. Other District 2. Other District 3. Other Gov. 3. Other Gov.
4. Don’t know 4. Don’t know
Specify (Governorate/District) for majority .Use the Specify (Governorate/District) for majority. Use the FROM FROM location list location list GOV: GOV:
DIS: DIS:
Nationality of Displaced population 4. Internally displaced Yemenis, # HH displaced from their original location in Yemen 5. Other countries nationals, displaced from their original # HH location in Yemen
E. TYPE OF SETTLEMENT/RESIDENCE FOR IDP POPULATION IN THE DISTRICT
Type of IDPs Temporary Settlements IDPs 1 In camps Yes No 2 In village/town, using rented accomodation Yes No 3 In village/town, with host families who are relatives (no rent fee) Yes No 4 In village/town, with host families who are not relatives (no rent fee) Yes No 5 In village/town, using schools, Health facilities, religious building Yes No 6 In village/town, using private or public building Yes No 7 In informal settlement (grouped families) in urban areas Yes No 8 In informal settlement (grouped families) in rural areas Yes No 9 Out of settlement (isolated families) Yes No
Socotra Rapid Assessment | Initial Findings | 30 November 2015 | 12
G. List the village/neighborhood/sites, if there are more than 20 to be listed copy the page and attach
For each location use one line and identify all types of locations and IDPs and total number in the District For Column 3&4.Period of arrival for majority: indicate the year (2014 and before 14b or 2015 15) and month in 2015 where the majority of IDP arrived For Column 5. Type of Residence use the codes from Section E. Type of location/residence for IDP population in the governorate. For Column 7. Accessibility use 1. Yes, team can go or 2. No, team cannot go 3. Partial access 4. Don’t Know Name of location use the Year Of Month of Type of Estimat Acces % % % location list arrival for arrival if Residence (circle all that ed sibility Women Men Child the 2015 for apply) number 18+ 0-17 majority the of IDPs 18+ 14b/15 majority HH
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) 10
_1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
_2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
_3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
_4 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
_5 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
_6 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
_7 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
_8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
_9 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
_10 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
_11 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
_12 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
_13 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
_14 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
_15 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
_16 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
_17 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
_18 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
_19 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
_20 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Codes for Type of location/residence for IDP (Column 4) If more than one write all applicable. Ex (1; 3; 4; …) 1 In camps 6 In village/town, using private or public building In informal settlement (grouped families) in 2 In village/town, using rented accomodation 7 urban areas In informal settlement (grouped families) in rural 3 In village/town, with host families who are relatives (no rent fee) 8 areas In village/town, with host families who are not relatives (no rent 4 9 Out of settlement (isolated families) fee) 5 In village/town, using schools, Health facilities, religious building
Socotra Rapid Assessment | Initial Findings | 30 November 2015 | 13
H. Sub division of LIST OF VILLAGES IN THE SUB DISTRICT For locations not listed in the village list Name of the location Number of Longitude Latitude Name of the Village IDPs on the Original list HHs Section G (1) (2) text X Y list _1
_2
_3
_4
_5
_6
_7
_8
_9
_10
_11
_12
_13
_14
_15
_16
_17
_18
_19
_20
In case there are villages that are not on the list please put their names and location here. Number of IDPs in this villages should be included in summary for existing village on the list.