DOCSLIB.ORG

SSMMA Freight Technical Memorandum 1 June 2008

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
SSMMA Freight Technical Memorandum 1 June 2008 South Suburban Freight Study Technical Memorandum 1: Study Area Profile and Inventory technical memorandum prepared for South Suburban Mayors and Managers Association and Chicago Southland Economic Development Corporation prepared by Cambridge Systematics, Inc. with Chicago Metropolis 2020 June 2008 www.camsys.com South Suburban Freight Study Technical Memorandum 1: Study Area Profile and Inventory prepared for South Suburban Mayors and Managers Association and Chicago Southland Economic Development Corporation prepared by Cambridge Systematics, Inc. 115 South LaSalle, Suite 2200 Chicago, Illinois 60603 with Chicago Metropolis 2020 date June 2008 South Suburban Freight Study Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction.....................................................................................................1-1 2.0 Freight Supporting Infrastructure ................................................................2-1 2.1 Roadways ................................................................................................2-2 Interstate Highways................................................................................2-2 Arterial Roadways ..................................................................................2-2 Truck Routes ...........................................................................................2-3 Truck Volumes........................................................................................2-4 Level of Service .......................................................................................2-8 2.2 Railroad Facilities..................................................................................2-12 Rail Lines/Carriers ...............................................................................2-12 Passenger Rail .......................................................................................2-19 Rail Traffic ............................................................................................. 2-21 Grade Crossings....................................................................................2-21 Yards/Yard Movements....................................................................... 2-21 Proposed Rail Improvements............................................................... 2-26 2.3 Airports and Air Cargo Facilities......................................................... 2-28 2.4 Intermodal Facilities .............................................................................2-30 Existing .................................................................................................. 2-30 Truck Terminals ....................................................................................2-30 2.5 Marine Port Facilities............................................................................2-33 2.6 Proposed Facilities ................................................................................2-37 3.0 Demand Drivers for Freight Services...........................................................3-1 3.1 Population ...............................................................................................3-1 3.2 Employment............................................................................................3-5 3.3 Business Facilities....................................................................................3-9 4.0 Freight Patterns...............................................................................................4-1 4.1 Existing/Future.......................................................................................4-1 Truck Volumes........................................................................................4-1 Rail Volumes ...........................................................................................4-1 Origins .....................................................................................................4-2 Destinations........................................................................................... 4-10 Commodities Terminating in Chicago................................................ 4-11 Cambridge Systematics, Inc. i 7838.001 Table of Contents, continued 5.0 Issues................................................................................................................5-1 5.1 Clearances (Truck/Railroad Viaducts) .................................................5-1 5.2 Truck Route Inconsistencies...................................................................5-2 5.3 Size and Weight Limits...........................................................................5-3 5.4 Freight Network Bottlenecks .................................................................5-7 Highway ..................................................................................................5-7 Rail Lines .................................................................................................5-8 5.5 Conflicting Land Use............................................................................ 5-10 Grade Crossings....................................................................................5-11 Hazardous Materials Movements........................................................ 5-12 6.0 Stakeholder Survey ........................................................................................6-1 6.1 Overview .................................................................................................6-1 6.2 Key Findings ...........................................................................................6-1 Greater Southland: Linchpin to Chicago’s Freight Hub .....................6-2 Industry’s Response to Intermodal Growth .........................................6-2 Need for Coordinated Planning and Development .............................6-3 Highway and Road Congestion.............................................................6-5 Rail Impacts.............................................................................................6-6 The Timing of Infrastructure Improvements Relative to Development ............................................................................................6-6 Land Use Compatibility .........................................................................6-7 Impacts on Existing Intermodal Terminals in the Chicago Region.....6-8 Operational Considerations for Local Trucking Firms ........................6-8 Economic Diversification........................................................................6-9 Skill and Availability of Local Workforce.............................................6-9 South Suburban Airport.........................................................................6-9 Inland Waterways................................................................................. 6-10 6.3 Stakeholder Recommendations ........................................................... 6-10 Funding Infrastructure Improvements/Addressing Congestion ..... 6-10 Evaluate and Prioritize Freight-Related Infrastructure Improvements........................................................................................6-12 Land Use Planning for Freight Development..................................... 6-13 Design Considerations for New Intermodal Terminals..................... 6-13 Regional Planning.................................................................................6-14 Operational Innovations to Improve the Business Climate............... 6-14 Workforce Training............................................................................... 6-15 7.0 Stakeholder Workshop ..................................................................................7-1 ii Cambridge Systematics, Inc. 7838.001 South Suburban Freight Study Appendices A. List of Interviewees ........................................................................................... 1 B. Sample Questionnaires..................................................................................... 1 B.1 Developer Questionnaire .......................................................................... 2 B.2 Government Questionnaire....................................................................... 7 B.3 Logistics-Rail-Trucker-Barge Questionnaire ............................................. 11 B.4 Shipper Questionnaire............................................................................. 16 C. List of Freight Advisory Committee Members .............................................. 1 D. Summary of Freight Advisory Committee Meetings .................................... 1 D.1 Meeting #1 D.2 Meeting #2 Cambridge Systematics, Inc. iii 7838.001 South Suburban Freight Study List of Tables Table 2.1 Heavy Commercial Vehicle Weighted Average AADT......................2-5 Table 2.2 V/C to LOS Relationship......................................................................2-8 Table 2.3 Proposed CN Acquisition of EJ&E Changes to Train Traffic ........... 2-17 Table 2.4 Metra and NICTD Commuter Rail Service........................................ 2-20 Table 2.5 Amtrak Rail Service............................................................................. 2-20 Table 2.6 Chicago Air Cargo Volume in Revenue............................................. 2-28 Table 2.7 Existing Major Intermodal Facilities .................................................. 2-30 Table 2.8 Top Domestic Destinations for Waterborne Freight from Chicago................................................................................................. 2-33 Table 2.9 Top
Load more

Recommended publications
  • CP's North American Rail
    2020_CP_NetworkMap_Large_Front_1.6_Final_LowRes.pdf 1 6/5/2020 8:24:47 AM 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 Lake CP Railway Mileage Between Cities Rail Industry Index Legend Athabasca AGR Alabama & Gulf Coast Railway ETR Essex Terminal Railway MNRR Minnesota Commercial Railway TCWR Twin Cities & Western Railroad CP Average scale y y y a AMTK Amtrak EXO EXO MRL Montana Rail Link Inc TPLC Toronto Port Lands Company t t y i i er e C on C r v APD Albany Port Railroad FEC Florida East Coast Railway NBR Northern & Bergen Railroad TPW Toledo, Peoria & Western Railway t oon y o ork éal t y t r 0 100 200 300 km r er Y a n t APM Montreal Port Authority FLR Fife Lake Railway NBSR New Brunswick Southern Railway TRR Torch River Rail CP trackage, haulage and commercial rights oit ago r k tland c ding on xico w r r r uébec innipeg Fort Nelson é APNC Appanoose County Community Railroad FMR Forty Mile Railroad NCR Nipissing Central Railway UP Union Pacic e ansas hi alga ancou egina as o dmon hunder B o o Q Det E F K M Minneapolis Mon Mont N Alba Buffalo C C P R Saint John S T T V W APR Alberta Prairie Railway Excursions GEXR Goderich-Exeter Railway NECR New England Central Railroad VAEX Vale Railway CP principal shortline connections Albany 689 2622 1092 792 2636 2702 1574 3518 1517 2965 234 147 3528 412 2150 691 2272 1373 552 3253 1792 BCR The British Columbia Railway Company GFR Grand Forks Railway NJT New Jersey Transit Rail Operations VIA Via Rail A BCRY Barrie-Collingwood Railway GJR Guelph Junction Railway NLR Northern Light Rail VTR
    [Show full text]
  • South Shore Freight's Fabulous Franchise
    South Shore GP38-2s lead a westbound freight on 11th Street on the east side of Michigan City, Ind. BY KEVIN P. KEEFE PHOTOS BY GREG MCDONNELL SOUTH SHORE FREIGHT’SFABULOUS FRANCHISE © 2017 Kalmbach Publishing Co. This material may not be reproduced in any 32 Trains JUNE form2017 without permission from the publisher. www.TrainsMag.com ENGINEER CHARLIE McLemore at the car lengths ... one car length ... that’ll do.” railroad in December 1990. “We’d con- throttle of No. 2001 as AF-2 (Michigan City- Then a muffled bang. vinced the trustee that we were the best op- Kingsbury turn) works Kingsbury Industrial After 90 minutes of switching worthy of tion because we’d built all those other Park at former Kingsbury Ordnance Plant. a Master Model Railroader session, the train deals,” recalls Peter A. Gilbertson, Anacos- is ready. McLemore lets the dispatcher know, tia’s founder and chairman. NICTD, a commuter authority created in receives a friendly “clear” from the voice in The South Shore purchase gave the 1977 by the state of Indiana to represent the South Shore dispatching center a few company a solid foothold for moving fur- Lake, Porter, LaPorte, and St. Joseph coun- hundred feet away, and AF-2 is off, trun- ther into short lines, a mission the compa- ties, the railroad’s basic service area. The COMMUTERS ALIGHT from a three-car dling down the Kingsbury line at 20 mph. ny since has pursued with the acquisition agency began running the trains in 1990. Railroad and today the operations head- NICTD train at Dune Park as a westbound of five other railroads (see page 40).
    [Show full text]
  • Cancels Fright Tariff Brc 8002-J
    BRC 8002-K (Cancels BRC 8002-J) THE BELT RAILWAY COMPANY OF CHICAGO FRIGHT TARIFF 8002-K (CANCELS FRIGHT TARIFF BRC 8002-J) Switching Tariff Issued: January 1st, 2020 Effective: January 1st, 2020 Intermediate, Terminal, and other chargers, rates, rules and regulations Applying on loaded and empty cars between connections named within and also on freight traffic originating or termination outside the Chicago Switching District from or to industries located on the Belt Railway Company of Chicago. This tariff governed by Uniform Classification as provided herein. Issued By: John Widowfield Director Revenue Accounting & Industrial Development 6900 South Central Avenue Chicago, Illinois 60638 BRC 8002-K (Cancels BRC 8002-J) Rules and Other Governing Provisions GENERAL RULES AND REGULATIONS ITEM SUBJECT APPLICATION VOLUME Volume Incentive Intermediate Switch Rates for traffic 1 INCENTIVE moving through the Chicago Gateway. The daily average car SWITCH RATES count will be calculated on the basis of each calendar month. CLEARING (Total Clearing Connection Traffic ÷ Days In The Month) CONNECTION Clearing Connection Traffic is defined as traffic delivered to TRAFFIC the BRC at Clearing Yard by an inbound carrier for an outbound carrier. Auto Carriers / Racks, Dangerous Explosive - Radioactive - TIH, Hazardous (Non-TIH), Dimensional, Do Not Hump, Locomotives, Passenger Cars, Perishable, Intermodal TOFC/COFC, cars received from intermediate switch carriers (i.e. CRL, IHB, Etc.) and BRC Industry Traffic are not subject to volume incentive rates. OUTSIDE Cars Interchanged at a location other than Clearing Yard. 2 CLEARING Cars will not qualify for volume incentive rates. TRAFFIC Any car delivered to BRC which is found to be "bad order" CAR HIRE ON 4 shall remain in the car hire account of the delivering carrier, CARS RECEIVED regardless of car mark, until repaired and subsequently IN BAD ORDER classified for appropriate outbound dispatchment.
    [Show full text]
  • Southeast Corridor Alternatives Analysis Locally Preferred Alternative Report
    SOUTHEAST CORRIDOR ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS DOCUMENT #9 LOCALLY PREFERRED ALTERNATIVE REPORT PREPARED BY AUGUST 2011 METRA – SOUTHEAST CORRIDOR LOCALLY PREFERRED ALTERNATIVE REPORT ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS DOCUMENTS 1. Detailed Work Scope 2. Purpose & Need 3. Initial Alternatives, Part I: Modes & Technologies 4. Evaluation Methodology 5. Initial Alternatives, Part I Screening and Part II: Conceptual Design 6. Screening of Initial Alternatives, Part II 7. Feasible Alternatives 8. Screening of Feasible Alternatives 9. Locally Preferred Alternative Report AECOM AUGUST 2011 I METRA – SOUTHEAST CORRIDOR LOCALLY PREFERRED ALTERNATIVE REPORT TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION.......................................................................................................... 1 A. PURPOSE.................................................................................................................. 1 B. BACKGROUND ......................................................................................................... 1 II. SUMMARY OF ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS.............................................................. 5 A. INITIAL SCREENING, PART I................................................................................... 5 B. DEFINITION AND SCREENING OF INITIAL ALTERNATIVES, PART II.................. 7 C. DEFINITION OF FEASIBLE ALTERNATIVES ........................................................ 10 D. DETAILED FINAL SCREENING.............................................................................. 11 III. PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT SUMMARY.......................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • News&Photos News&Photos
    NEWS&PHOTOS 120-car train is a mess, utterly unclassified, to the consternation of reau, and holds an option to buy. tons of ethanol and other agrichemicals and farm products. engineer Jake Dawson and conductor T.J. Landuit. For example, the If you think about it the way Henry Posner III must (he being So don’t feel too sorry for Mr. Posner. By sheer dumb luck (his Rock Island, Ill., setout is scattered in nine different spots through- chairman of II’s parent, Rail Development Corp.) it’s a double wham- admission), his company bought the Iowa Interstate at a low ebb, for out the train. Nobody bothered to turn the three locomotives, ei- my. Just getting over the road between Blue Island and Bureau, 98 what I suspect were pennies on the dollar. Then came the ethanol FRED W. FRAILEY ther. So all the power is long-hood forward, led by a GP38-2 and miles, is painfully slow. Freights on Metra are capped at 30 mph and boom that tripled carloadings. It’s safe to say that with Iowa Inter- followed by two big ES44ACs. “Spin [turn] the power at Bureau,” must run under protection of an absolute block, despite the fact that state, Posner made his family’s third fortune. Behold the life after death says the dispatcher in Cedar Rapids, Iowa. But many an hour will the double-track line is equipped with Centralized Traffic Control. BICB reaches Rock Island at 7:30 the next morning, the crew pass until you reach that Illinois hamlet.
    [Show full text]
  • 2019 Financial Statements and Accompanying Notes
    Commuter Rail Division of The Regional Transportation Authority and The Northeast Illinois Regional Commuter Railroad Corporation (Public Entities, doing business as Metra) Financial Statements and Supplementary Information as of and for the Year Ended December 31, 2019, and Independent Auditors’ Report COMMUTER RAIL DIVISION OF THE REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY AND THE NORTHEAST ILLINOIS REGIONAL COMMUTER RAILROAD CORPORATION (Public Entities, doing business as Metra) TABLE OF CONTENTS Page INDEPENDENT AUDITORS’ REPORT 1-2 MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (UNAUDITED) 3–16 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF AND FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2019: Statement of Net Position 17–18 Statement of Revenues, Expenses, and Changes in Net Position 19 Statement of Cash Flows 20–21 Notes to Financial Statements 22–41 REQUIRED SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION AS OF AND FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2019: 42 Schedule of Proportionate Share of Net Pension Liability and Related Ratios—(Unaudited) 43 Schedule of Pension Contributions—(Unaudited) 44 Schedule of Changes in Metra’s Total OPEB Liability and Related Ratios—(Unaudited) 45 OTHER INFORMATION: 46 Schedule of Revenue and Expenses—Budget to Actual (Budgetary Basis)—(Unaudited) 47 Budgetary Basis Schedule of Operations—(Unaudited) 48 Notes to Supplementary Information—(Unaudited) 49 INDEPENDENT AUDITORS’ REPORT To the Board of Directors Commuter Rail Division of the Regional Transportation Authority and the Northeast Illinois Regional Commuter Railroad Corporation (Public entities, doing business as Metra) Report on the Financial Statements We have audited the accompanying financial statements of the Commuter Rail Division of the Regional Transportation Authority and the Northeast Illinois Regional Commuter Railroad Corporation, both doing business as Metra (Metra), as of and for the year ended December 31, 2019, and the related notes to the financial statements, which collectively comprise Metra’s basic financial statements as listed in the table of contents.
    [Show full text]
  • FRA Guide for Preparing Accident/Incident Reports
    FRA Guide for Preparing Accident/Incident Reports U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Railroad Administration Office of Railroad Safety DOT/FRA/RRS-22 Published: May 23, 2011 Effective: July 1, 2011 This page intentionally left blank MAIL MONTHLY ACCIDENT/INCIDENT REPORTING SUBMISSIONS TO: FRA Project Office 2600 Park Tower Drive, Suite 1000 Vienna, VA 22180 Please refer to http://safetydata.fra.dot.gov/OfficeofSafety, and click on “Click Here for Changes in Accident/Incident Recordkeeping and Reporting” for updated information. Preface The Federal Railroad Administration’s (FRA) regulations on reporting railroad accidents/incidents are found primarily in Title 49 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 225.1 The purpose of the regulations in Part 225 is to provide FRA with accurate information concerning the hazards and risks that exist on the Nation’s railroads. See § 225.1. FRA needs this information to effectively carry out its regulatory and enforcement responsibilities under the Federal railroad safety statutes.2 FRA also uses this information for determining comparative trends of railroad safety and to develop hazard elimination and risk reduction programs that focus on preventing railroad injuries and accidents. 1 For brevity, further references in the Guide to sections in 49 CFR Part 225 will omit “49 CFR” and include only the section, e.g., § 225.9. 2 Title 49 U.S.C. chapters 51, 201–213. iv Table of Contents Executive Summary ........................................................................................................................ 1 1. Overview of Railroad Accident/Incident Recordkeeping and Reporting Requirements and Miscellaneous Provisions and Information ............................................................................... 4 1.1 General ............................................................................................................................. 4 1.1.1 Purpose of the FRA Guide for Preparing Accident/Incident Reports .......................
    [Show full text]
  • South Suburban Commuter Rail Feasibility Study
    South Suburban Commuter Rail Feasibility Study FINAL REPORT and April 1999 South Suburban Commuter Rail Feasibility Study TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE FOREWORD ........................................................ iii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................ ES-1 1.0 INTRODUCTION .......................................... 1 1.1 Study Area .................................................... 1 1.2 Historical Background ............................................ 3 1.3 Candidate Alignments ............................................ 4 2.0 EXISTING CONDITIONS .................................. 7 2.1 Alignment Options .............................................. 7 2.2 Descriptions of Alignment Segments ................................. 10 2.3 Freight Railroad Operating Characteristics ............................ 12 2.4 Existing Transportation Services .................................... 15 2.5 Potential Station Locations ........................................ 17 3.0 FUTURE PLANS ........................................... 27 3.1 Study-Area Demographics ......................................... 27 3.2 Rail Corridor Community Analysis .................................. 30 3.3 Railroads and Other Agencies ...................................... 36 4.0 POTENTIAL OPERATIONS ............................... 39 4.1 Service Concept ................................................ 40 4.2 Utilization of Existing Facilities ..................................... 40 4.3 Potential Transfers with Existing Lines ..............................
    [Show full text]
  • CREATE WA11 CRISI 2018 Project Narrative
    1 CREATE Program EW3A CRISI Grant Application Project Narrative Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction .......................................................................................................................... 1 2.0 Project Summary .................................................................................................................. 1 3.0 Project Funding .................................................................................................................... 2 4.0 Applicant Eligibility ............................................................................................................. 3 5.0 Project Eligibility ................................................................................................................. 4 6.0 Detailed Project Description ................................................................................................ 5 6.1 Project Description: CREATE Project EW3A ............................................................ 5 6.2 Transportation Challenges ........................................................................................... 6 Track Configuration Limits Throughput Capacity ...................................................... 6 Manually-Operated Switches Generate Travel Time Delays ...................................... 6 6.3 Project Users and Beneficiaries ................................................................................... 8 Direct Users ................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Illinois Rail Fast Facts for 2019 Freight Railroads …
    Freight Railroads in Illinois Rail Fast Facts For 2019 Freight railroads ….............................................................................................................................................................52 Freight railroad mileage …..........................................................................................................................................6,883 Freight rail employees …...............................................................................................................................................11,772 Average wages & benefits per employee …...................................................................................................$134,270 Railroad retirement beneficiaries …......................................................................................................................30,300 Railroad retirement benefits paid ….....................................................................................................................$786 million U.S. Economy: According to a Towson University study, in 2017, America's Class I railroads supported: Sustainability: Railroads are the most fuel efficient way to move freight over land. It would have taken approximately 28.2 million additional trucks to handle the 507.4 million tons of freight that moved by rail in Illinois in 2019. Rail Traffic Originated in 2019 Total Tons: 125.9 million Total Carloads: 3,796,300 Commodity Tons (mil) Carloads Intermodal 40.5 2,937,300 Coal 23.4 200,200 Farm Products 21.6
    [Show full text]
  • Freight Trains Per Day, Chicago Terminal Area, 2018 (Map 2 of 2)
    Mundelein CJR: Chicago Junction Railway Chicago Area Freight Railroads, 2018 CLCY: Chessie Logistics Co. Class I: Local Railroads Vernon Hills CPRR: Chicago Port Railroad Freight Trains per Day, BNSF: BNSF Railway CSS: Chicago, South Shore, and CPW: Chicago, Peoria & Western CN: Canadian National South Bend Railway Chicago Terminal Area, CP: Canadian Pacific IR: Illinois Railway CRL: Chicago Rail Link CSXT: CSX Transportation CSDX: Sanitary District of Chicago Railroad 2018 (Map 2 of 2) NS: Norfolk Southern Switching and Terminal Railroads CTM: Chicago Terminal Railway UP: Union Pacific Railroad AVRR: Ag Valley Railroad IHB: Indiana Harbor Belt BJRY: Burlington Junction Railway SCIH: South ChicHaighola &nd I nPdairakna Harbor 0 2.5 5 7.5 10 Regional Railroads BRC: Belt Railway of Chicago XXXX: Bulkmatic Transport Company IAIS: Iowa Interstate Railroad CCUO: Chicago ChemunBguf fRalao iGlroroavde XXXX: Norland North Chicago Miles WSOR: Wisconsin & Southern CCRR: C & C Railroad XXXX: Scrap Metal Services Terminal CERR: Cicero Central Railroad Railroad Company Prepared by U Wheeling Chicago Metropolitan P C Northbrook Palatine N ¯ Agency for Planning Arlington Heights September, 2019 CN UP Wilmette Glenview Mount Prospect FreightTrains M Evanston per Day, 2018 E Skokie T R A Streamwood Des Plaines Niles 0 or Not Schaumburg CJR Cook County in Region Elk Grove Village Park Ridge U P 1 to 3 METRA C T Hanover Park M 4 to 6 Bartlett 7 to 12 U P 13 to 24 Chicago M CN U M E 25 to 36 E U T T P RA Addison P R A Carol Stream C C 37 to 60 Glendale Heights
    [Show full text]
  • Gcorgeneral Code of Operating Rules
    GCORGeneral Code of Operating Rules Eighth Edition Eff ective April 1, 2020 These rules govern the operation of the adopting railroads and supersede all previous GCOR rules and instructions. © 2020 General Code of Operating Rules Committee, All Rights Reserved i-2 GCOR—Eighth Edition—April 1, 2020 Bauxite & Northern Railway Company Front cover photo by William Diehl Bay Coast Railroad Adopted by: The Bay Line Railroad, L.L.C. Belt Railway Company of Chicago Aberdeen Carolina & Western Railway BHP Nevada Railway Company Aberdeen & Rockfish Railroad B&H Rail Corp Acadiana Railway Company Birmingham Terminal Railroad Adams Industries Railroad Blackwell Northern Gateway Railroad Adrian and Blissfield Railroad Blue Ridge Southern Railroad Affton Terminal Railroad BNSF Railway Ag Valley Railroad Bogalusa Bayou Railroad Alabama & Gulf Coast Railway LLC Boise Valley Railroad Alabama Southern Railroad Buffalo & Pittsburgh Railroad, Inc. Alabama & Tennessee River Railway, LLC Burlington Junction Railway Alabama Warrior Railroad Butte, Anaconda & Pacific Railroad Alaska Railroad Corporation C&J Railroad Company Albany & Eastern Railroad Company California Northern Railroad Company Aliquippa & Ohio River Railroad Co. California Western Railroad Alliance Terminal Railway, LLC Camas Prairie RailNet, Inc. Altamont Commuter Express Rail Authority Camp Chase Railway Alton & Southern Railway Canadian Pacific Amtrak—Chicago Terminal Caney Fork & Western Railroad Amtrak—Michigan Line Canon City and Royal Gorge Railroad Amtrak—NOUPT Capital Metropolitan Transportation
    [Show full text]