DOCSLIB.ORG

Project Coast: Apartheid's Chemical and Biological Warfare Programme

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

The United Nations Institute for Disarmament Research (UNIDIR—an intergovernmental organization within the United Nations—conducts research on disarmament and security. UNIDIR is based in Geneva, Switzerland, the centre for bilateral and multilateral disarmament and non- proliferation negotiations, and home of the Conference on Disarmament. The Institute explores current issues pertaining to the variety of existing and future armaments, as well as global diplomacy and local entrenched tensions and conflicts. Working with researchers, diplomats, Government officials, NGOs and other institutions since 1980, UNIDIR acts as a bridge between the research community and Governments. UNIDIR’s activities are funded by contributions from Governments and donors foundations. http://www.unidir.org The Centre for Conflict Resolution (formerly known as the Centre for Intergroup Studies) was founded by the University of Cape Town in 1968 as an independent non-profit organisation. It is based in the Western Cape and works nationally (South Africa) and elsewhere in Africa to contribute towards a just and sustainable peace in South Africa and other African countries by promoting constructive, creative and co-operative approaches to the resolution of conflict and the reduction of violence. Its goals are to: contribute towards an understanding of conflict and violence; promote public awareness of the value and practice of constructive conflict resolution; provide third-party assistance in the resolution of community and political conflict; equip and empower individuals and groups with the skills to manage community, political and social conflict; participate in national and regional peace initiatives; contribute to the transformation of South African society and its institutions by promoting democratic values; promote disarmament and demilitarisation in South and Southern Africa. http://ccrweb.ccr.uct.ac.za Cover page: Eric Miller—iAfrika—Teargas, Cape Town, South Africa, 24 May 1990 UNIDIR/2002/12 Project Coast: Apartheid’s Chemical and Biological Warfare Programme Chandré Gould and Peter Folb Edited by Robert Berold UNIDIR United Nations Institute for Disarmament Research Geneva, Switzerland CCR Centre for Conflict Resolution Cape Town, South Africa NOTE The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Secretariat of the United Nations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. * * * The views expressed in this paper are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the United Nations Secretariat. UNIDIR/2002/12 Copyright © United Nations, 2002 All rights reserved UNITED NATIONS PUBLICATION Sales No. GV.E.02.0.10 ISBN 92-9045-144-0 CONTENTS Page Foreword by Desmond Mpilo Tutu. v Preface by Laurie Nathan and Patricia Lewis . vii Acknowledgements . xi Acronyms. xiii Introduction. 1 Summary of Findings . 7 The Botha Regime and Total Strategy . 11 The Regional Context. 21 Chemical Weapons in South Africa Prior to Project Coast. 31 Project Coast’s Links with the Police and Operational Units of the Military. 47 Getting Down to Business . 57 Roodeplaat Research Laboratories . 69 The Private Companies . 103 The De Klerk Years (1989-1993) and the Use of CBW Agents . 115 The Phases of Project Coast’s Development . 143 Allegations of Fraud: The Sale of Delta G Scientific and RRL. 145 The Intention of the Programme. 153 Incidents of Poisoning . 159 Structure and Management of Project Coast. 169 International Links . 191 Closing Down . 209 Basson’s Arrest and the TRC Hearing . 223 The Criminal Trial of Dr Wouter Basson . 231 Notes. 241 iii FOREWORD Dastardly in its concept and execution, Project Coast was a reflection of the inherent evil of apartheid. As Chair of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission, I had the privilege of participating in an extraordinary and unique experience. I heard people tell of their part in some of the most terrible crimes against their brothers and sisters. I heard them plead for forgiveness from those they had wronged and I saw the spirit of humanity triumph in the forgiven and the forgiving. Forgiveness depends on repentance, which has to be based on an acknowledgement of what was done wrong, and therefore on disclosure of the truth, you cannot forgive what you do not know. It was therefore critical that the Truth and Reconciliation Commission, and then later the High Court, was able to expose the truth of Project Coast to the people of South Africa and the rest of the world. This book by Chandré Gould and Peter Folb makes a vital contribution to our understanding of how the apartheid regime planned the deliberate use of chemical and biological agents on people, how those involved put together a determined programme to acquire knowledge and materials to develop the means to poison people within and outside South Africa’s borders and how corruption inside that programme eventually led to their downfall. It is only when we have this understanding that we can learn and move on from the past. It is only then that we can prevent this happening again somewhere else. I thank Chandré Gould, Peter Folb, the Centre for Conflict Research in Cape Town and the United Nations Institute for Disarmament Research in Geneva for publishing this account of Project Coast. A huge amount of work has gone into producing this account of the inhumanity at the heart of apartheid. What we learn from this research is what now allows South Africa to work tirelessly in the international arena to prevent the development and use of chemical and biological weapons. It is only by having dealt with the truth of our past, however painful and difficult that v vi might have been, that we can grow in the light and assist others in their struggle to be free. It is my fervent hope that, by spreading knowledge, this book will help in the fight against the spread of chemical and biological weapons. I pray that shedding light on the sordid past of apartheid’s chemical and biological warfare programme will provide a salutary reminder to people that we must do all we can to uphold international law and leave no stone unturned in our efforts to prevent the deliberate use of disease as a weapon against people. God bless you. Desmond Mpilo Tutu Archbishop Emeritus Cape Town October 2002 PREFACE In the bleakest of days during apartheid in South Africa, despite its membership of the 1972 Biological Weapons Convention, a programme to poison the regime’s foes with chemical and biological warfare agents was conceived in great secrecy at the heart of the military establishment. Project Coast was to develop a range of chemical and biological agents designed to control, poison and kill people within and outside South Africa. Large quantities of riot gas were produced, as were methaqualone and MDMA. Other chemical and biological agents were produced in small quantities and were used in the covert murders and attempted murders of individuals who were seen as a threat to the apartheid government. This included members of the police and the armed forces and, at least once, an organism was used with the intention of deliberately infecting a whole community. That so much could have been done and by so few people during the era of sanctions was due to the secrecy and lack of civil control over the personnel involved and to the complicity of foreign actors. The project was funded through the back door and its leader was given carte blanche to do whatever he saw fit in terms of learning and buying what he could from abroad. Project Coast: Apartheid’s Chemical and Biological Warfare Programme written by Chandré Gould and Peter Folb, tracks the history of Project Coast. It was through the revelations at the Truth and Reconciliation Commission, the arrest of Wouter Basson and then later the criminal prosecution of Basson in the High Court in Pretoria that the pieces of the puzzle could be fitted together. Of course, not everything is known and many documents are still missing, but enough has been revealed for us to learn some sobering lessons from South Africa’s experience. In the early nineties, coming clean about (and dismantling) its nuclear weapons programme allowed the new South Africa to take a moral lead in the prevention of nuclear weapons proliferation and in pursuit of global nuclear disarmament. Perhaps in much the same way, the revelations over Project Coast and the transparency with which the South African vii viii government has dealt with them, has enabled South Africa to vigorously pursue the global effort to ban biological weapons and take a lead role in the negotiations for strengthening the 1972 Biological and Toxin Weapons Convention. South Africa’s disarmament policy is coherent and consistent in its opposition to weapons of mass destruction in all their forms and in all countries. Having come clean on its experience during the apartheid years lends real credibility to South Africa’s ethical and practical stance on international disarmament. South Africa went to the edge and beyond and then—under a new, enlightened regime—came back. Others can do the same. We have a great deal to learn from Project Coast. It warns us of how a few people, with political and financial backing, lack of financial controls, lack of a moral and ethical framework, and lack of due civil process, can manufacture chemical and biological agents to achieve the assassination of individuals and threaten whole communities. Now, with the advances in genetic engineering leading to biological agents that could be engineered to affect only certain groups of people, who knows what the future holds and who knows who may get their hands on such organisms.
Recommended publications
  • June 13, 2016 Volume Xiv, Issue 12

    June 13, 2016 Volume Xiv, Issue 12

    THE JAMESTOWN FOUNDATION JUNE 13, 2016 VOLUME XIV, ISSUE 12 p.1 p.3 p.6 p.8 Alexander Sehmer Abubakar Siddique Jessica Moody Wladimir van Wilgenburg BRIEFS Taliban Victories in The Niger Delta U.S. Backing Gives Helmand Province Avengers: A New Kurds Cover for United Prove Test for Afghan Threat to Oil Produc- Federal Region in Government ers in Nigeria Northern Syria LIBYA: CLOSING IN ON ISLAMIC STATE’S STRONG- battle ahead. IS is thought to have heavily fortified Sirte. HOLD The advancing forces will face thousands of fighters and potentially suicide bombers and Improvised Explosive Alexander Sehmer Devices (IEDs). There also remains the question of just how unified an assault will be. The Misratan-led forces Libyan forces have had a run of luck against Islamic have been brought together under the Bunyan Marsous State (IS) fighters in recent weeks, with two separate Operations Room (BMOR), established by Prime Minis- militias capturing several towns and closing in on the ter Faiez Serraj, head of the Government of National extremists’ stronghold of Sirte. Accord (GNA) (Libya Herald, June 8). According to BMOR, they are working with the PFG. Amid Libya’s The Petroleum Facilities Guard (PFG), the unit set up to fractious politics, however, it is unlikely to be that sim- protect Libya’s oil installations, took control of the town ple. of Ben Jawad on May 30 and moved on to capture Naw- filiyah, forcing IS fighters back towards Sirte (Libya Her- The PFG is not a natural ally for the Misratans, and the ald, June 1).
  • Impact of Scientific Developments on the Chemical Weapons Convention (IUPAC Technical Report)*

    Impact of Scientific Developments on the Chemical Weapons Convention (IUPAC Technical Report)*

    Pure Appl. Chem., Vol. 85, No. 4, pp. 851–881, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1351/PAC-REP-12-11-18 © 2013 IUPAC, Publication date (Web): 16 February 2013 Impact of scientific developments on the Chemical Weapons Convention (IUPAC Technical Report)* Katie Smallwood1, Ralf Trapp2, Robert Mathews3, Beat Schmidt4, and Leiv K. Sydnes5,‡ 1Independent Consultant, Geneva, Switzerland; 2International Disarmament Consultant, 74270 Chessenaz, France; 3Defence Science and Technology Organisation, Australia; 4Spiez Laboratory, 3700 Spiez, Switzerland; 5Department of Chemistry, University of Bergen, 5007 Bergen, Norway Abstract: This document represents the final report of discussions and conclusions arising from the workshop on Developments in Science and Technology Relevant to the Chemical Weapons Convention, held in Spiez, Switzerland in February 2012. Keywords: Chemical Weapons Convention; CWC; implementation; science and technology; Third Review Conference. CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION 2. SUMMARY OF FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 2.1 Overall findings and recommendations 2.2 S&T advances and their impact on the scope of the CWC 2.3 Developments that affect the practical implementation of the CWC 2.4 S&T advances specifically relevant to verification 2.5 S&T advances specifically relevant to protection against CW 2.6 The evolution of the international S&T environment 2.7 Extending support for the CWC via outreach and education 3. THE WORKSHOP 3.1 Overview and background 3.2 Convergence of chemistry and biology 3.3 New synthesis and toxicological analysis methods 3.4 Developing new materials and delivery mechanisms 3.5 Technical discussion 3.6 Advances in industrial production methods 3.7 Chemical safety and security: Possession, transfer, and acquisition 3.8 Defense against CW agents 3.9 Chemical safety and security: Engaging the chemical sciences community *Sponsoring body: IUPAC Executive Committee: see more details on p.
  • The Gordian Knot: Apartheid & the Unmaking of the Liberal World Order, 1960-1970

    The Gordian Knot: Apartheid & the Unmaking of the Liberal World Order, 1960-1970

    THE GORDIAN KNOT: APARTHEID & THE UNMAKING OF THE LIBERAL WORLD ORDER, 1960-1970 DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of the Ohio State University By Ryan Irwin, B.A., M.A. History ***** The Ohio State University 2010 Dissertation Committee: Professor Peter Hahn Professor Robert McMahon Professor Kevin Boyle Professor Martha van Wyk © 2010 by Ryan Irwin All rights reserved. ABSTRACT This dissertation examines the apartheid debate from an international perspective. Positioned at the methodological intersection of intellectual and diplomatic history, it examines how, where, and why African nationalists, Afrikaner nationalists, and American liberals contested South Africa’s place in the global community in the 1960s. It uses this fight to explore the contradictions of international politics in the decade after second-wave decolonization. The apartheid debate was never at the center of global affairs in this period, but it rallied international opinions in ways that attached particular meanings to concepts of development, order, justice, and freedom. As such, the debate about South Africa provides a microcosm of the larger postcolonial moment, exposing the deep-seated differences between politicians and policymakers in the First and Third Worlds, as well as the paradoxical nature of change in the late twentieth century. This dissertation tells three interlocking stories. First, it charts the rise and fall of African nationalism. For a brief yet important moment in the early and mid-1960s, African nationalists felt genuinely that they could remake global norms in Africa’s image and abolish the ideology of white supremacy through U.N.
  • South Africa: Afrikaans Film and the Imagined Boundaries of Afrikanerdom

    South Africa: Afrikaans Film and the Imagined Boundaries of Afrikanerdom

    A new laager for a “new” South Africa: Afrikaans film and the imagined boundaries of Afrikanerdom Adriaan Stefanus Steyn Thesis presented in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in Social Anthropology in the faculty of Arts and Social Sciences at Stellenbosch University Supervisor: Dr Bernard Dubbeld Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences Department of Sociology and Social Anthropology December 2016 Stellenbosch University https://scholar.sun.ac.za By submitting this thesis electronically, I declare that the entirety of the work contained therein is my own, original work, that I am the sole author thereof (save to the extent explicitly otherwise stated), that reproduction and publication thereof by Stellenbosch University will not infringe any third party rights and that I have not previously in its entirety or in part submitted it for obtaining any qualification. December 2016 Copyright © 2016 Stellenbosch University All rights reserved Stellenbosch University https://scholar.sun.ac.za Abstract The Afrikaans film industry came into existence in 1916, with the commercial release of De Voortrekkers (Shaw), and, after 1948, flourished under the guardianship of the National Party. South Africa’s democratic transition, however, seemed to announce the death of the Afrikaans film. In 1998, the industry entered a nine-year slump during which not a single Afrikaans film was released on the commercial circuit. Yet, in 2007, the industry was revived and has been expanding rapidly ever since. This study is an attempt to explain the Afrikaans film industry’s recent success and also to consider some of its consequences. To do this, I situate the Afrikaans film industry within a larger – and equally flourishing – Afrikaans culture industry.
  • Of Trials, Reparation, and Transformation in Post-Apartheid South Africa: the Making of a Common Purpose

    Of Trials, Reparation, and Transformation in Post-Apartheid South Africa: the Making of a Common Purpose

    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE NYLS Law Review Vols. 22-63 (1976-2019) Volume 60 Issue 2 Twenty Years of South African Constitutionalism: Constitutional Rights, Article 6 Judicial Independence and the Transition to Democracy January 2016 Of Trials, Reparation, and Transformation in Post-Apartheid South Africa: The Making of A Common Purpose ANDREA DURBACH Professor of Law and Director of the Australian Human Rights Centre, Faculty of Law, University of New South Wales, Australia Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.nyls.edu/nyls_law_review Part of the Constitutional Law Commons Recommended Citation ANDREA DURBACH, Of Trials, Reparation, and Transformation in Post-Apartheid South Africa: The Making of A Common Purpose, 60 N.Y.L. SCH. L. REV. (2015-2016). This Article is brought to you for free and open access by DigitalCommons@NYLS. It has been accepted for inclusion in NYLS Law Review by an authorized editor of DigitalCommons@NYLS. NEW YORK LAW SCHOOL LAW REVIEW VOLUME 60 | 2015/16 VOLUME 60 | 2015/16 Andrea Durbach Of Trials, Reparation, and Transformation in Post-Apartheid South Africa: The Making of A Common Purpose 60 N.Y.L. Sch. L. Rev. 409 (2015–2016) ABOUT THE AUTHOR: Andrea Durbach is a Professor of Law and Director of the Australian Human Rights Centre, Faculty of Law, University of New South Wales, Australia. Born and educated in South Africa, she practiced as a political trial lawyer, representing victims and opponents of apartheid laws. In 1988 she was appointed solicitor to twenty-five black defendants in a notorious death penalty case in South Africa and later published an account of her experiences in Andrea Durbach, Upington: A Story of Trials and Reconciliation (1999) (for information on the other editions of this book see infra note 42), on which the documentary, A Common Purpose (Looking Glass Pictures 2011) is based.
  • 198 Broadway 9 Now York, N.Y. 10038 * (212) 962-1210 These

    198 Broadway 9 Now York, N.Y. 10038 * (212) 962-1210 These

    198 Broadway 9 Now York, N.Y. 10038 * (212) 962-1210 M. William Howard, President Jennifer Davis,Landis, Executiue Vice President Director REGIME DECLARES WAR ON THE CHURCH Elizabeth SAPARTHEID'I F ACTION FOR SANCTIONS NEEDED NOW September 1988 TO: All Concerned Persons of Faith FROM: Dumisani Kumalo, Religious Action Network coordinator On August 31 a massive bomb destroyed the headquarters of the South African Council of Churches and other anti-apartheid and human rights groups in Johannesburg, injuring 23 people. Six days later South African security police raided the Cape Town offices of the Anglican Church. There they seized a tape recording of a sermon by Archbishop Desmond Tutu urging South African Christians to boycott segregated local elections scheduled for October. He has called for the boycott "as a nonviolent way of expressing our opposition to the evil and injustice of apartheid." For this "crime" Archbishop Tutu could be sentenced to ten years imprisonment. The government has denied complicity in the SACC bombing, but church leaders have no doubt that, as Archbishop Tutu said, "This act was committed by the perpetrators or supporters of apartheid." Only hours after the blast, the Minister for Law and Order, Adriaan Vlok, attacked the church leaders as "wolves in sheep's clothing" who support "liberation theology" and "people's democracy." "The time has come," he warned, "to tear off their masks." These incidents are as clear as Minister Vlok's threat-South Africa's Christian, Jewish and Moslem communities must end their courageous witness against inhumanity and injustice or face increasing government-sponsored violence and oppression.
  • Truth and Reconciliation Commission of South Africa Report: Volume 2

    Truth and Reconciliation Commission of South Africa Report: Volume 2

    VOLUME TWO Truth and Reconciliation Commission of South Africa Report The report of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission was presented to President Nelson Mandela on 29 October 1998. Archbishop Desmond Tutu Ms Hlengiwe Mkhize Chairperson Dr Alex Boraine Mr Dumisa Ntsebeza Vice-Chairperson Ms Mary Burton Dr Wendy Orr Revd Bongani Finca Adv Denzil Potgieter Ms Sisi Khampepe Dr Fazel Randera Mr Richard Lyster Ms Yasmin Sooka Mr Wynand Malan* Ms Glenda Wildschut Dr Khoza Mgojo * Subject to minority position. See volume 5. Chief Executive Officer: Dr Biki Minyuku I CONTENTS Chapter 1 Chapter 6 National Overview .......................................... 1 Special Investigation The Death of President Samora Machel ................................................ 488 Chapter 2 The State outside Special Investigation South Africa (1960-1990).......................... 42 Helderberg Crash ........................................... 497 Special Investigation Chemical and Biological Warfare........ 504 Chapter 3 The State inside South Africa (1960-1990).......................... 165 Special Investigation Appendix: State Security Forces: Directory Secret State Funding................................... 518 of Organisations and Structures........................ 313 Special Investigation Exhumations....................................................... 537 Chapter 4 The Liberation Movements from 1960 to 1990 ..................................................... 325 Special Investigation Appendix: Organisational structures and The Mandela United
  • EPISCOPAL CHURCHPEOPLE for a FREE SOUTHERN AFRICA C S 339 Lafayette Street ~77-0 New York

    EPISCOPAL CHURCHPEOPLE for a FREE SOUTHERN AFRICA C S 339 Lafayette Street ~77-0 New York

    E EPISCOPAL CHURCHPEOPLE for a FREE SOUTHERN AFRICA C S 339 Lafayette Street ~77-0 New York. .Y.10012 ,..I' ?hone: (2:2) 66 J• #8 FAX: (212) 979-1013 6 March 989 NOT BY BREAD ALO E 'The hunger strike is an organised THE GUARDIA~ and coordinated attempt to cast Frida~' March 3 1989 the authorities in a bad light and to blackmail them. The state cannot allow itself to be threat­ ened by means of hun~er strikes. ' - Adriaan Vlok, South African inister of Law and Order. The struggle for freedom in South Africa is centered on a countrywide hunger strike by the hundreds of people held in detentior. under Pre­ torian ukase which does not allow them recourse to any court of law. Adriaan Vlok has been forced to agree to release some hunger strikers lest they die on his hands, but the Detainees' Aid Cen­ tre in Johannesburg reports that of the 118 prisoners let go out of a nationwide total of some 850 '99 per­ cent' have been severely restricted in movement and forbidden to speak to the :\ lTU'w\d of 1.500 aUt'ndcd it :o.Vl'tOlall.:hun:h '~"\lU:l' In Lape Town Y~~lcrday In ,uppon uf lht, dClawt!'es ~till not reo. e<.I press. 'The detainees are b~ ~oulh walt~ oUI~lde wor~hlppers ha~~:ll simply being released into till' Alru.:an (,ovl'rnrnl'nl. :\ h.l.rgc number of polH;c the chun:h unlil all the another prison,' said Ms Audrey Coleman of the e­ tainees' Aid Centre.
  • In the High Court of South Africa Gauteng

    In the High Court of South Africa Gauteng

    IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA GAUTENG DIVISION, JOHANNESBURG CASE NO: In the matter between: THE SOUTH AFRICAN HISTORY ARCHIVE TRUST Applicant and THE MINISTER OF DEFENCE AND MILITARY VETERANS First Respondent THE INFORMATION OFFICER: DEPARTMENT OF DEFENCE AND MILITARY VETERANS Second Respondent FOUNDING AFFIDAVIT I, the undersigned, CATHERINE MOIRA KENNEDY do hereby make oath and state the following: 1 I am director of the South African History Archive Trust, situated at the Women's Jail, Constitution Hill, 1 Kotze Street, Braamfontein, Johannesburg. 2 Save where otherwise stated or where the context indicates to the contrary, the allegations made in this affidavit are within my personal knowledge, and are to the best of my knowledge and belief both true and correct. Where I make legal submissions, I do so on the basis of advice of the applicant's legal representatives. 3 I am duly authorised to bring this application on behalf of the applicant. In this regard, I attach a copy of a resolution of the Trustees of the South African History Archive Trust marked "CMK1". THE PARTIES 4 The applicant is THE SOUTH AFRICAN HISTORY ARCHIVE TRUST("SAHA"), a non-governmental organisation constituted as a trust in terms of the laws of South Africa. SAHA requested the information, which forms the subject matter of this application, from the first and second respondents. 2 5 The first respondent is the MINISTER OF DEFENCE AND MILITARY VETERANS in the national government("the Minister"), who is cited in her official capacity as the Minister responsible for the Department of Defence and Military Veterans ("Department"), with offices situated at Armscor Building, Block 5, Level 4, cnr Delmas Avenue and Nossob Street, Erasmuskloof, Pretoria.
  • South African Army Vision 2020

    South African Army Vision 2020

    South African Army Vision 2020 Security Challenges Shaping the Future South African Army EDITED BY LEN LE ROUX www.issafrica.org © 2007, Institute for Security Studies All rights reserved Copyright in the volume as a whole is vested in the Institute for Security Studies, and no part may be reproduced in whole or part without the express permission, in writing, of both the authors and the publishers. The opinions expressed in this book do not necessarily reflect those of the Institute, its Trustees, members of the ISS Council, or donors. Authors contribute to ISS publications in their personal capacity. ISBN: 978-1-920114-24-4 First published by the Institute for Security Studies PO Box 1787, Brooklyn Square 0075 Pretoria/Tshwane, South Africa Cover photo: Colonel Johan Blaauw Cover design and layout: Marketing Support Services Printer: D&V Premier Print Group CONTENTS Preface v About the authors vii CHAPTER ONE The South African army in its global and local contexts in the early 21st century: A mission-critical analysis 1 Professor G Prins CHAPTER TWO Change and continuity in global politics and military strategy 35 Professor J E Spence CHAPTER THREE The African strategic environment 2020: Challenges for the SA army 45 Dr Jakkie Cilliers CHAPTER FOUR Conflict in Africa: Future challenges 83 Dr Martin Rupiya CHAPTER FIVE Regional security 93 Ms Virginia Gamba CHAPTER SIX The alliances of violent non-state actors and the future of terrorism in Africa 107 Dr Abdel Aziz M Shady CHAPTER SEVEN International and regional trends in peace missions:
  • The Apartheid Divide

    The Apartheid Divide

    PUNC XI: EYE OF THE STORM 2018 The Apartheid Divide Sponsored by: Presented by: Table of Contents Letter from the Crisis Director Page 2 Letter from the Chair Page 4 Committee History Page 6 Delegate Positions Page 8 Committee Structure Page 11 1 Letter From the Crisis Director Hello, and welcome to The Apartheid Divide! My name is Allison Brown and I will be your Crisis Director for this committee. I am a sophomore majoring in Biomedical Engineering with a focus in Biochemicals. This is my second time being a Crisis Director, and my fourth time staffing a conference. I have been participating in Model United Nations conferences since high school and have continued doing so ever since I arrived at Penn State. Participating in the Penn State International Affairs and Debate Association has helped to shape my college experience. Even though I am an engineering major, I am passionate about current events, politics, and international relations. This club has allowed me to keep up with my passion, while also keeping with my other passion; biology. I really enjoy being a Crisis Director and I am so excited to do it again! This committee is going to focus on a very serious topic from our world’s past; Apartheid. The members of the Presidents Council during this time were quite the collection of people. It is important during the course of this conference that you remember to be respectful to other delegates (both in and out of character) and to be thoughtful before making decisions or speeches. If you ever feel uncomfortable, please inform myself or the chair, Sneha, and we will address the issue.
  • Puun 1 9 8 3 0

    Puun 1 9 8 3 0

    GENERAL ASSEMBLY GENERAL ASSEMBLY OFFICIAL RECORDS: THIRTY-SEVENTH SESSION SUPPLEMENT No. 24 (A/37/24) UNITED NATIONS New York, 1983 REPORT OF THE UNITED NATIONS COUNCIL FOR NAMIBIA NOTE Symbols of United Nations documents are composed of capital letters combined with figures. Mention of such a symbol indicates a reference to a United Nations document. The present volume contains the final text of the report of the United Nations Council for Namibia, which was originally issued in mimeograph form as documents A/37/24 (Part I) of I December 1982 and A/37/24 (Part II ) of 11 December 1982. CONTENTS Chapter Paragraphs ABBREVIATIONS .............................................................. LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL ...................................................... INTRODUCTION .................................................... PART ONE: WORK OF THE COUNCIL AS A POLICY-MAKING ORGAN OF THE UNITED NATIONS ................................... I. GENERAL ................................................... II. CONSIDERATION OF THE QUESTION OF NAMIBIA BY THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY .... .............................. .... A. Eighth emergency special session ...................... B. Thirty-sixth session ................................ III. SECURITY COUNCIL ..................................... IV. CO-OPERATION WITH OTHER UNITED NATIONS BODIES ............. A. Special Committee on the Situation with regard to the Implementation of the Declaration on the Granting of Independence to Colonial Countries and Peoples ...........................................