Missouri Law Review Volume 85 Issue 3 Article 7 Summer 2020 Indoctrination and Social Influence as a Defense to Crime: Are We Responsible for Who We Are? Paul H. Robinson Lindsay Holcomb Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.missouri.edu/mlr Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Paul H. Robinson and Lindsay Holcomb, Indoctrination and Social Influence as a Defense to Crime: Are We Responsible for Who We Are?, 85 MO. L. REV. (2020) Available at: https://scholarship.law.missouri.edu/mlr/vol85/iss3/7 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Journals at University of Missouri School of Law Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Missouri Law Review by an authorized editor of University of Missouri School of Law Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact
[email protected]. Robinson and Holcomb: Indoctrination and Social Influence as a Defense to Crime: Are We Indoctrination and Social Influence as a Defense to Crime: Are We Responsible for Who We Are? Paul H. Robinson* and Lindsay Holcomb** ABSTRACT A patriotic prisoner of war is brainwashed by his North Korean captors into refusing repatriation and undertaking treasonous anti-American propaganda for the communist regime. Despite the general abhorrence of treason in time of war, the American public opposes criminal liability for such indoctrinated soldiers, yet existing criminal law provides no defense or mitigation because, at the time of the offense, the indoctrinated offender suffers no cognitive or control dysfunction, no mental or emotional impairment, and no external or internal compulsion.