Adiabatic Density Surface, Neutral Density Surface, Potential Density Surface, and Mixing Path*

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Adiabatic Density Surface, Neutral Density Surface, Potential Density Surface, and Mixing Path* 热带海洋学报 JOURNAL OF TROPICAL OCEANOGRAPHY 2014 年 第 33 卷 第 4 期: 1−19 海洋水文学 doi:10.3969/j.issn.1009-5470.2014.04.001 http://www.jto.ac.cn Adiabatic density surface, neutral density surface, potential * density surface, and mixing path HUANG Rui-xin Department of Physical Oceanography, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, Woods Hole, MA 02543, USA Abstract: In this paper, adiabatic density surface, neutral density surface and potential density surface are compared. The adiabatic density surface is defined as the surface on which a water parcel can move adiabatically, without changing its potential temperature and salinity. For a water parcel taken at a given station and pressure level, the corresponding adiabatic density surface can be determined through simple calculations. This family of surface is neutrally buoyant in the world ocean, and different from other surfaces that are not truly neutrally buoyant. In order to explore mixing path in the ocean, a mixing ratio m is introduced, which is defined as the portion of potential temperature and salinity of a water parcel that has exchanged with the environment during a segment of migration in the ocean. Two extreme situations of mixing path in the ocean are m=0 (no mixing), which is represented by the adiabatic density curve, and m=1, where the original information is completely lost through mixing. The latter is represented by the neutral density curve. The reality lies in between, namely, 0<m<1. In the turbulent ocean, there are potentially infinite mixing paths, some of which may be identified by using different tracers (or their combinations) and different mixing criteria. Searching for mixing paths in the real ocean presents a great challenge for further research. Key words: adiabatic density surface, neutral density surface, potential density surface, mixing path CLC number: P731 Document code: A Serial number: 1009-5470(2014)04-0001-19 Water mass analysis, including its spreading follows. and transformation, has been a classical topic in 1) Finding the trajectories/surfaces along physical oceanography. For example, the core layer which a water parcel can travel adiabatically and method was widely used in many classical papers, net-buoyancy-freely. such as Wust (1935); a more concise description can 2) Finding the surfaces on which two water be found in Stewart (2009). As an improvement, parcels can adiabatically exchange their horizontal different surfaces were introduced for analyzing the positions and without changing the shape of the lateral distribution of water properties. A landmark original surface. was the pioneering work of Montgomery (1938) on 3) Finding the mixing trajectories or mixing isentropic analysis. Since then many attempts have surfaces. been made to find suitable surfaces for isentropic The mixing path is the trajectory of a water (or adiabatic, i.e. without changing potential mass spreading/ transforming in the ocean. In the temperature and salinity) motions, such as the turbulent ocean, this is a loosely defined term. By potential temperature surface and the isopycnal definition, it is a Lagrangian trajectory along which surface (including the potential density surface and certain water properties are conserved. In addition, different types of approximately neutral density mixing takes place along the trajectory, leading to a surfaces). The essential criteria/goals in searching gradual modification of water properties. As a result, for suitable surfaces for water mass analysis are as the trajectory of a Lagrangian float may be different Received date: 2013-11-26; Revised date: 2013-11-26. Editor: LIN Qiang Biography: HUANG Rui-xin (1942~), male, scientist emeritus, theory and numerical modeling of large-scale oceanic circulation. E-mail: [email protected] *I have benefited through discussions with many of my colleagues. In particular, critical comments and constructive suggestions from Drs. Kenneth H. Brink and M. Susan Lozier helped me greatly in correcting some misconceptions and improving the presentation. 2 热带海洋学报 Vol. 33, No. 4 / Jul., 2014 from the trajectory of a water mass because the Due to the nonlinearity of equation of state, the former involves no mixing, but the latter involves helicity of seawater is non-zero. (Helicity for a mixing. vector A is defined as H =⋅∇×AA. For the A mixing surface is a generalization of mixing application to the NDS, A =∇−∇Θρ ()βαS (where path, and it is defined as the surface on which a β is the haline constraction coefficient, and α is the water parcel can move around, spreading and thermal expansion coefficient) is the neutral vector, mixing with the environment. Movement of a water see Jackett, et al, 1997). Thus, a NDS may depend parcel on the mixing surface is always involved on the paths chosen in defining it. As a result, an with a gradual modification of its properties. exact three-dimensional neutral surface does not The specific entropy of seawater is closely exist in the ocean (McDougall, 1987a). In addition linked to its potential temperature (Feistel, 2003, to the approximate NDS algorithm postulated by 2005). Water parcels continuously change their Jackett and McDougall (1997), there are other ways entropy due to lateral and vertical diffusion. Thus, to define an approximate NDS, such as the constant entropy surfaces diagnosed from the ocean minimization technique postulated by Eden, et al cannot be used as the surfaces for analyzing a water (1999), or the orthobaric density surface by de mass’s movement in the ocean. Szoeke, et al (2009). Montgomery’s (1938) analysis was based on However, on any 2-D (two-dimensional) the σt surface. By definition, σt=ρ(S, T, p=0) (where vertical plane the situation is different. On a 2-D ρ is density, S is salinity, T is temperature, and p is surface, the slope of the potential density surface pressure) is not a conserved quantity, so this does (using the local pressure as the reference) is a 2-D not lead to an isentropic surface. As a better vector field. If the stratification is stable, the local alternative, the potential density surface (PDS isopycnal slope cannot be vertical. Thus, from this hereafter) σp=ρ(Θ, S, pr)=const. (where Θ is 2-D vector field, a family of neutral curves can be potential temperature, pr is reference pressure) was constructed. For example, one can use the simple introduced and widely used in hydrographic data Euler method or any similar, more accurate, method. analysis. However, the PDS is not perfect either, This family of curve has the following properties. because at depths away from the reference pressure, First, everywhere the tangent of these neutral curves potential density cannot accurately represent the matches the tangent of the local potential density local stratification. In fact, stratification or static surface. Second, through any given point on this stability is defined using the local pressure as 2-D surface, there is only one neutral curve. reference. Due to the nonlinearity of the equation Although the neutral density and the NDS are of the state, using a non-local reference pressure to now often used in oceanographic data analysis, calculate the static stability can lead to a value some of their fundamental properties have not yet quite different from the truth. To overcome this been examined thoroughly. In particular, it is not problem, the patched potential density method was clear whether a water parcel moving on a NDS will introduced, e.g. Reid (1994) or de Szoeke, et al always have the same in-situ density as the local (2005). water parcel originally sitting on the surface. In fact, As an improvement, the neutral density surface whether the so-called NDS is really neutrally (NDS hereafter) was introduced. The basic concept buoyant has not been rigorously proven. of a NDS was to build up a surface whose tangent at There is another type of density surface, first each point matches the local potential density discussed by McDougall (1987b) in connection with surface tangent, as first postulated by Forster, et al the propagation of the Submesoscale Coherent (1976); their idea has been generalized into a theory Vorticies (SCV). In this study, we will call this of neutral density and NDS, e.g., McDougall surface the adiabatic density surface (ADS hereafter) (1987a), Jackett, et al (1997). and will show that a water parcel can adiabatically HUANG Rui-xin: Adiabatic density surface, neutral density surface, potential density surface, and mixing path 3 travel on its ADS and net-buoyancy-freely, i.e., that current stemming from a site of deep water it satisfies the first of the above criteria. formation. The other means is through turbulent Unfortunately, due to thermobaricity, there is diffusion, which is closely linked to mesoscale and no surface in the ocean along which two water submesoscale eddies. A good example is the parcels can exchange their horizontal positions spreading of the Mediterranean Overflow Water through adiabatic motions without changing the (MOF) in the North Atlantic. The tongue-like shape of the corresponding surface. This can be feature of MOF has been known for a long time, but shown as follows. there is no permanent current associated with it. In Assume that on a thermodynamic surface (a fact, the spreading of MOF is primarily due to the PDS, a quasi-NDS or any other similar surface) westward propagating mesoscale eddies, called there are two water parcels A and B with unit mass, Meddies, e.g., Armi, et al (1989). sitting on pressure levels ρA and ρB, Δρ=ρA–ρB >0. Another example is AABW (Antarctic Bottom If we adiabatically move parcel A to the position of Water), which influences properties as far as into B, its in-situ density change is the Northern Hemisphere. Wijffels, et al (1996) analyzed water masses and circulation at 10°N in Δ=ρρAB→ A()BA − ρ A( )() ρκ 0 Δp η A, the Pacific, and they were able to identify a where ρA(A) and ρA(B) depict water parcel A’s substantial contribution of bottom water having density at location A and B, ρ is the reference 0 Antarctic origin.
Recommended publications
  • Chapter 2 Approximate Thermodynamics
    Chapter 2 Approximate Thermodynamics 2.1 Atmosphere Various texts (Byers 1965, Wallace and Hobbs 2006) provide elementary treatments of at- mospheric thermodynamics, while Iribarne and Godson (1981) and Emanuel (1994) present more advanced treatments. We provide only an approximate treatment which is accept- able for idealized calculations, but must be replaced by a more accurate representation if quantitative comparisons with the real world are desired. 2.1.1 Dry entropy In an atmosphere without moisture the ideal gas law for dry air is p = R T (2.1) ρ d where p is the pressure, ρ is the air density, T is the absolute temperature, and Rd = R/md, R being the universal gas constant and md the molecular weight of dry air. If moisture is present there are minor modications to this equation, which we ignore here. The dry entropy per unit mass of air is sd = Cp ln(T/TR) − Rd ln(p/pR) (2.2) where Cp is the mass (not molar) specic heat of dry air at constant pressure, TR is a constant reference temperature (say 300 K), and pR is a constant reference pressure (say 1000 hPa). Recall that the specic heats at constant pressure and volume (Cv) are related to the gas constant by Cp − Cv = Rd. (2.3) A variable related to the dry entropy is the potential temperature θ, which is dened Rd/Cp θ = TR exp(sd/Cp) = T (pR/p) . (2.4) The potential temperature is the temperature air would have if it were compressed or ex- panded (without condensation of water) in a reversible adiabatic fashion to the reference pressure pR.
    [Show full text]
  • Gibbs Seawater (GSW) Oceanographic Toolbox of TEOS–10
    Gibbs SeaWater (GSW) Oceanographic Toolbox of TEOS–10 documentation set density and enthalpy, based on the 48-term expression for density, gsw_front_page front page to the GSW Oceanographic Toolbox The functions in this group ending in “_CT” may also be called without “_CT”. gsw_contents contents of the GSW Oceanographic Toolbox gsw_check_functions checks that all the GSW functions work correctly gsw_rho_CT in-situ density, and potential density gsw_demo demonstrates many GSW functions and features gsw_alpha_CT thermal expansion coefficient with respect to CT gsw_beta_CT saline contraction coefficient at constant CT Practical Salinity (SP), PSS-78 gsw_rho_alpha_beta_CT in-situ density, thermal expansion & saline contraction coefficients gsw_specvol_CT specific volume gsw_SP_from_C Practical Salinity from conductivity, C (incl. for SP < 2) gsw_specvol_anom_CT specific volume anomaly gsw_C_from_SP conductivity, C, from Practical Salinity (incl. for SP < 2) gsw_sigma0_CT sigma0 from CT with reference pressure of 0 dbar gsw_SP_from_R Practical Salinity from conductivity ratio, R (incl. for SP < 2) gsw_sigma1_CT sigma1 from CT with reference pressure of 1000 dbar gsw_R_from_SP conductivity ratio, R, from Practical Salinity (incl. for SP < 2) gsw_sigma2_CT sigma2 from CT with reference pressure of 2000 dbar gsw_SP_salinometer Practical Salinity from a laboratory salinometer (incl. for SP < 2) gsw_sigma3_CT sigma3 from CT with reference pressure of 3000 dbar gsw_sigma4_CT sigma4 from CT with reference pressure of 4000 dbar Absolute Salinity
    [Show full text]
  • Spiciness Theory Revisited, with New Views on Neutral Density, Orthogonality, and Passiveness
    Ocean Sci., 17, 203–219, 2021 https://doi.org/10.5194/os-17-203-2021 © Author(s) 2021. This work is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. Spiciness theory revisited, with new views on neutral density, orthogonality, and passiveness Rémi Tailleux Dept. of Meteorology, University of Reading, Earley Gate, RG6 6ET Reading, United Kingdom Correspondence: Rémi Tailleux ([email protected]) Received: 26 April 2020 – Discussion started: 20 May 2020 Revised: 8 December 2020 – Accepted: 9 December 2020 – Published: 28 January 2021 Abstract. This paper clarifies the theoretical basis for con- 1 Introduction structing spiciness variables optimal for characterising ocean water masses. Three essential ingredients are identified: (1) a As is well known, three independent variables are needed to material density variable γ that is as neutral as feasible, (2) a fully characterise the thermodynamic state of a fluid parcel in material state function ξ independent of γ but otherwise ar- the standard approximation of seawater as a binary fluid. The bitrary, and (3) an empirically determined reference function standard description usually relies on the use of a tempera- ξr(γ / of γ representing the imagined behaviour of ξ in a ture variable (such as potential temperature θ, in situ temper- notional spiceless ocean. Ingredient (1) is required because ature T , or Conservative Temperature 2), a salinity variable contrary to what is often assumed, it is not the properties im- (such as reference composition salinity S or Absolute Salin- posed on ξ (such as orthogonality) that determine its dynam- ity SA), and pressure p.
    [Show full text]
  • Equations of Motion Using Thermodynamic Coordinates
    2814 JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL OCEANOGRAPHY VOLUME 30 Equations of Motion Using Thermodynamic Coordinates ROLAND A. DE SZOEKE College of Oceanic and Atmospheric Sciences, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon (Manuscript received 21 October 1998, in ®nal form 30 December 1999) ABSTRACT The forms of the primitive equations of motion and continuity are obtained when an arbitrary thermodynamic state variableÐrestricted only to be vertically monotonicÐis used as the vertical coordinate. Natural general- izations of the Montgomery and Exner functions suggest themselves. For a multicomponent ¯uid like seawater the dependence of the coordinate on salinity, coupled with the thermobaric effect, generates contributions to the momentum balance from the salinity gradient, multiplied by a thermodynamic coef®cient that can be com- pletely described given the coordinate variable and the equation of state. In the vorticity balance this term produces a contribution identi®ed with the baroclinicity vector. Only when the coordinate variable is a function only of pressure and in situ speci®c volume does the coef®cient of salinity gradient vanish and the baroclinicity vector disappear. This coef®cient is explicitly calculated and displayed for potential speci®c volume as thermodynamic coor- dinate, and for patched potential speci®c volume, where different reference pressures are used in various pressure subranges. Except within a few hundred decibars of the reference pressures, the salinity-gradient coef®cient is not negligible and ought to be taken into account in ocean circulation models. 1. Introduction perature surfaces is a potential for the acceleration ®eld, Potential temperature, the temperature a ¯uid parcel when friction is negligible. Because the gradient of this would have if removed adiabatically and reversibly from function gives the geostrophic ¯ow when it balances ambient pressure to a reference pressure, is a valuable Coriolis force, it is also called the geostrophic stream- concept in the study of the atmosphere and oceans.
    [Show full text]
  • Recovery of Temperature, Salinity, and Potential Density from Ocean
    PUBLICATIONS Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans RESEARCH ARTICLE Recovery of temperature, salinity, and potential density from 10.1002/2013JC009662 ocean reflectivity Key Points: Berta Biescas1,2, Barry R. Ruddick1, Mladen R. Nedimovic3,4,5, Valentı Sallare`s2, Guillermo Bornstein2, Recovery of oceanic T, S, and and Jhon F. Mojica2 potential density from acoustic reflectivity data 1Department of Oceanography, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada, 2Department of Marine Geology, Thermal anomalies observations at 3 the Mediterranean tongue level Institut de Cie`ncies del Mar ICM-CSIC, Barcelona, Spain, Department of Earth’s Sciences, Dalhousie University, Halifax, 4 5 Comparison between acoustic Nova Scotia, Canada, Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory of Columbia University, Palisades, New York, USA, University of reflectors in the ocean and isopycnals Texas Institute for Geophysics, Austin, Texas, USA Supporting Information: Methods Abstract This work explores a method to recover temperature, salinity, and potential density of the Supporting figures ocean using acoustic reflectivity data and time and space coincident expendable bathythermographs (XBT). The acoustically derived (vertical frequency >10 Hz) and the XBT-derived (vertical frequency <10 Hz) impe- Correspondence to: dances are summed in the time domain to form impedance profiles. Temperature (T) and salinity (S) are B. Biescas, then calculated from impedance using the international thermodynamics equations of seawater (GSW [email protected] TEOS-10) and an empirical T-S relation derived with neural networks; and finally potential density (q) is cal- culated from T and S. The main difference between this method and previous inversion works done from Citation: Biescas, B., B. R. Ruddick, M. R. real multichannel seismic reflection (MCS) data recorded in the ocean, is that it inverts density and it does Nedimovic, V.
    [Show full text]
  • Physical Properties of Seawater
    CHAPTER 3 Physical Properties of Seawater 3.1. MOLECULAR PROPERTIES in the oceans, because water is such an effective OF WATER heat reservoir (see Section S15.6 located on the textbook Web site Many of the unique characteristics of the ; “S” denotes supplemental ocean can be ascribed to the nature of water material). itself. Consisting of two positively charged As seawater is heated, molecular activity hydrogen ions and a single negatively charged increases and thermal expansion occurs, oxygen ion, water is arranged as a polar mole- reducing the density. In freshwater, as tempera- cule having positive and negative sides. This ture increases from the freezing point up to about molecular polarity leads to water’s high dielec- 4C, the added heat energy forms molecular tric constant (ability to withstand or balance an chains whose alignment causes the water to electric field). Water is able to dissolve many shrink, increasing the density. As temperature substances because the polar water molecules increases above this point, the chains break align to shield each ion, resisting the recombina- down and thermal expansion takes over; this tion of the ions. The ocean’s salty character is explains why fresh water has a density maximum due to the abundance of dissolved ions. at about 4C rather than at its freezing point. In The polar nature of the water molecule seawater, these molecular effects are combined causes it to form polymer-like chains of up to with the influence of salt, which inhibits the eight molecules. Approximately 90% of the formation of the chains. For the normal range of water molecules are found in these chains.
    [Show full text]
  • Is the Neutral Surface Really Neutral? a Close Examination of Energetics of Along Isopycnal Mixing
    Is the neutral surface really neutral? A close examination of energetics of along isopycnal mixing Rui Xin Huang Department of Physical Oceanography Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution Woods Hole, MA 02543, USA April 19, 2010 Abstract The concept of along-isopycnal (along-neutral-surface) mixing has been one of the foundations of the classical large-scale oceanic circulation framework. Neutral surface has been defined a surface that a water parcel move a small distance along such a surface does not require work against buoyancy. A close examination reveals two important issues. First, due to mass continuity it is meaningless to discuss the consequence of moving a single water parcel. Instead, we have to deal with at least two parcels in discussing the movement of water masses and energy change of the system. Second, movement along the so-called neutral surface or isopycnal surface in most cases is associated with changes in the total gravitational potential energy of the ocean. In light of this discovery, neutral surface may be treated as a preferred surface for the lateral mixing in the ocean. However, there is no neutral surface even at the infinitesimal sense. Thus, although approximate neutral surfaces can be defined for the global oceans and used in analysis of global thermohaline circulation, they are not the surface along which water parcels actually travel. In this sense, thus, any approximate neutral surface can be used, and their function is virtually the same. Since the structure of the global thermohaline circulation change with time, the most suitable option of quasi-neutral surface is the one which is most flexible and easy to be implemented in numerical models.
    [Show full text]
  • The All-Atlantic Temperature-Salinity-Pressure Relation and Patched Potential Density
    Journal of Marine Research, 63, 59–93, 2005 The all-Atlantic temperature-salinity-pressure relation and patched potential density by Roland A. de Szoeke1 and Scott R. Springer2 ABSTRACT The relation between temperature, salinity, and pressure in the Atlantic Ocean is examined. Most of the Atlantic resolves itself into three two-dimensional manifolds of three-dimensional thermody- namic space: a northern, more saline, branch, and a southern, fresher, branch, each quite independent of pressure, and between them a bridge, on which density is uniform at constant pressure. The properties of the branches are crucial to the construction of joint potential density surfaces, patched together at 1000 db intervals. By resolving more finely in pressure (illustrated with 200 db spacing), a finer system of patched potential density surfaces can be obtained, and indeed the continuous limit can be taken. This limit gives a form of orthobaric density, regionally differentiated because it is based on the duplicate regional branches. A mapping can be devised, using the properties of the bridge waters, that links the southern and northern forms of orthobaric density across the boundary between their respective regions of validity. The parallel of patched potential density surfaces to orthobaric density surfaces permits the use of measures developed for the latter to estimate quantitative measures of the material nature (or otherwise) of the former. Simply put, within the waters of the respective branches the patched isopycnals, or orthobaric isopycnals, are very nearly material, limited only by inherent irreversible mixing processes. However, where these isopycnals cross the bridge waters, significant, reversible, material exchange across them may occur.
    [Show full text]
  • Orthobaric Density: a Thermodynamic Variable for Ocean Circulation Studies
    2830 JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL OCEANOGRAPHY VOLUME 30 Orthobaric Density: A Thermodynamic Variable for Ocean Circulation Studies ROLAND A. DE SZOEKE,SCOTT R. SPRINGER, AND DAVID M. OXILIA College of Oceanic and Atmospheric Sciences, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon (Manuscript received 21 October 1998, in ®nal form 30 December 1999) ABSTRACT A new density variable, empirically corrected for pressure, is constructed. This is done by ®rst ®tting com- pressibility (or sound speed) computed from global ocean datasets to an empirical function of pressure and in situ density (or speci®c volume). Then, by replacing true compressibility by this best-®t virtual compressibility in the thermodynamic density equation, an exact integral of a Pfaf®an differential form can be found; this is called orthobaric density. The compressibility anomaly (true minus best-®t) is not neglected, but used to develop a gain factor c on the irreversible processes that contribute to the density equation and drive diapycnal motion. The complement of the gain factor, c 2 1, multiplies the reversible motion of orthobaric density surfaces to make a second contribution to diapycnal motion. The gain factor is a diagnostic of the materiality of orthobaric density: gain factors of 1 would indicate that orthobaric density surfaces are as material as potential density surfaces. Calculations of the gain factor for extensive north±south ocean sections in the Atlantic and Paci®c show that it generally lies between 0.8 and 1.2. Orthobaric density in the ocean possesses advantages over potential density that commend its use as a vertical coordinate for both descriptive and modeling purposes.
    [Show full text]
  • Reduction of Density and Pressure Gradient Errors in Ocean Simulations
    JULY 2001 NOTES AND CORRESPONDENCE 1915 Reduction of Density and Pressure Gradient Errors in Ocean Simulations JOHN K. DUKOWICZ Theoretical Division, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico 23 October 2000 and 30 January 2001 ABSTRACT Existing ocean models often contain errors associated with the computation of the density and the associated 21 21 pressure gradient. Boussinesq models approximate the pressure gradient force, r =p, by r 0 =p, where r0 is a constant reference density. The error associated with this approximation can be as large as 5%. In addition, Cartesian and sigma-coordinate models usually compute density from an equation of state where its pressure dependence is replaced by a depth dependence through an approximate conversion of depth to pressure to avoid the solution of a nonlinear hydrostatic equation. The dynamic consequences of this approximation and the associated errors can be signi®cant. Here it is shown that it is possible to derive an equivalent but ``stiffer'' equation of state by the use of modi®ed density and pressure, r* and p*, obtained by eliminating the contribution of the pressure-dependent part of the adiabatic compressibility (about 90% of the total). By doing this, the errors associated with both approximations are reduced by an order of magnitude, while changes to the code or to the code structure are minimal. 1. Introduction approximation to (3) in ®xed vertical coordinate models is Consider the horizontal pressure force in ocean mod- els: r ø r(S, u,p0(z)), (5) 1 where p (z) is a speci®ed depth-to-pressure conversion PGF 5 =p, (1) 0 r function such as that proposed by Fofonoff and Millard (1983), for example.
    [Show full text]
  • A New Algorithm to Accurately Calculate Neutral Tracer Gradients and Their
    1 A new algorithm to accurately calculate neutral tracer gradients and their 2 impacts on vertical heat transport and water mass transformation ∗ 3 Sjoerd Groeskamp and Paul M. Barker and Trevor J. McDougall 4 School of Mathematics and Statistics, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, 5 Australia 6 Ryan P. Abernathey 7 Columbia University, Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory, New York City, NY, USA 8 Stephen M. Griffies 9 NOAA Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory & Princeton University Program in Atmospheric 10 and Oceanic Sciences, Princeton, USA ∗ 11 Corresponding author address: Sjoerd Groeskamp, School of Mathematics and Statistics UNSW 12 Sydney, NSW, 2052, Australia 13 E-mail: [email protected] Generated using v4.3.2 of the AMS LATEX template 1 ABSTRACT 14 Mesoscale eddies stir along the neutral plane, and the resulting neutral diffu- 15 sion is a fundamental aspect of subgrid scale tracer transport in ocean models. 16 Calculating neutral diffusion traditionally involves calculating neutral slopes 17 and three-dimensional tracer gradients. The calculation of the neutral slope 18 usually occurs by computing the ratio of the horizontal to vertical locally ref- 19 erenced potential density derivative. This approach is problematic in regions 20 of weak vertical stratification, prompting the use of a variety of ad hoc reg- 21 ularization methods that can lead to rather nonphysical dependencies for the 22 resulting neutral tracer gradients. We here propose an alternative method that 23 is based on a search algorithm that requires no ad hoc regularization. Com- 24 paring results from this new method to the traditional method reveals large 25 differences in spurious diffusion, heat transport and water mass transforma- 26 tion rates that may all affect the physics of, for example, a numerical ocean 27 model.
    [Show full text]
  • Rates and Mechanisms of Water Mass Transformation in the Labrador Sea As Inferred from Tracer Observations*
    666 JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL OCEANOGRAPHY VOLUME 32 Rates and Mechanisms of Water Mass Transformation in the Labrador Sea as Inferred from Tracer Observations* SAMAR KHATIWALA,PETER SCHLOSSER, AND MARTIN VISBECK Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory and Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Columbia University, Palisades, New York (Manuscript received 15 February 2000, in ®nal form 8 May 2001) ABSTRACT Time series of hydrographic and transient tracer (3H and 3He) observations from the central Labrador Sea collected between 1991 and 1996 are presented to document the complex changes in the tracer ®elds as a result of variations in convective activity during the 1990s. Between 1991 and 1993, as atmospheric forcing intensi®ed, convection penetrated to progressively increasing depths, reaching ;2300 m in the winter of 1993. Over that period the potential temperature (u)/salinity (S) properties of Labrador Sea Water stayed nearly constant as surface cooling and downward mixing of freshwater was balanced by excavating and upward mixing of the warmer and saltier Northeast Atlantic Deep Water. It is shown that the net change in heat content of the water column (150±2500 m) between 1991 and 1993 was negligible compared to the estimated mean heat loss over that period (110 W m22), implying that the lateral convergence of heat into the central Labrador Sea nearly balances the atmospheric cooling on a surprisingly short timescale. Interestingly, the 3H±3He age of Labrador Sea Water increased during this period of intensifying convection. Starting in 1995, winters were milder and convection was restricted to the upper 800 m. Between 1994 and 1996, the evolution of 3H±3He age is similar to that of a stagnant water body.
    [Show full text]