Association of Myostatin on Early Calf Mortality, Growth, and Carcass Composition Traits in Crossbred Cattle E

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Association of Myostatin on Early Calf Mortality, Growth, and Carcass Composition Traits in Crossbred Cattle E View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Roman L. Hruska U.S. Meat Animal Research U.S. Department of Agriculture: Agricultural Center Research Service, Lincoln, Nebraska 2004 Association of myostatin on early calf mortality, growth, and carcass composition traits in crossbred cattle E. Casas U.S. Meat Animal Research Center, USDA, ARS, [email protected] G. L. Bennett U.S. Meat Animal Research Center, USDA, ARS, [email protected] T. P.L. Smith U.S. Meat Animal Research Center, [email protected] L. V. Cundiff U.S. Meat Animal Research Center, USDA, ARS, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/hruskareports Casas, E.; Bennett, G. L.; Smith, T. P.L.; and Cundiff, L. V., "Association of myostatin on early calf mortality, growth, and carcass composition traits in crossbred cattle" (2004). Roman L. Hruska U.S. Meat Animal Research Center. 368. http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/hruskareports/368 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the U.S. Department of Agriculture: Agricultural Research Service, Lincoln, Nebraska at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Roman L. Hruska U.S. Meat Animal Research Center by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. Association of myostatin on early calf mortality, growth, and carcass composition traits in crossbred cattle1,2 E. Casas3, G. L. Bennett, T. P. L. Smith, and L. V. Cundiff U.S. Meat Animal Research Center, USDA, ARS, Clay Center, NE 68933-0166 ABSTRACT: The objective of this study was to inves- were evaluated in the surviving animals (n = 1,370), tigate a potential association of an inactive myostatin including birth, weaning, and live weight at slaughter, allele with early calf mortality, and evaluate its effect and postweaning ADG. Carcass composition traits ana- on growth and carcass traits in a crossbred population. lyzed were hot carcass weight, fat thickness, LM area, Animals were obtained by mating F1 cows to F1 (Belgian marbling score, USDA yield grade, estimated kidney, Blue × British Breed) or Charolais sires. Cows were pelvic, and heart fat, retail product yield and weight, obtained from mating Hereford, Angus, and MARC III fat yield and weight, bone yield and weight, and per- (¹⁄₄ Hereford, ¹⁄₄ Angus, ¹⁄₄ Pinzgauer, and ¹⁄₄ Red Poll) centage of carcasses classified as Choice. Charolais lack dams to Hereford, Angus, Tuli, Boran, Brahman, or the inactive myostatin allele segregating in Belgian Belgian Blue sires. Belgian Blue was the source of the Blue; thus, in the population sired by Charolais (n = inactive myostatin allele. Myostatin genotypes were de- 645), only animals with zero or one copy of the inactive termined for all animals including those that died be- myostatin allele were evaluated. Animals carrying one fore weaning. Early calf mortality was examined in the copy were heavier at birth and at weaning, and their F2 subpopulation (n = 154), derived from the F1 sires carcasses were leaner and more muscled. In the popula- mated to F1 cows from Belgian Blue sires, to evaluate tion sired by Belgian Blue × British Breed (n = 725), animals with zero, one, or two copies of inactive myo- animals with two copies of inactive myostatin allele statin allele. An overall 1:2:1 ratio (homozygous active were heavier at birth, leaner, and had a higher propor- myostatin allele:heterozygous:homozygous inactive tion of muscle mass than animals with zero or one cop- myostatin allele) was observed in the population; how- ies. Heterozygous animals were heaviest at weaning ever, a comparison between calves dying before wean- and had the highest live weight, whereas animals with ing and those alive at slaughter showed an unequal zero copies had the highest fat content. The use of the distribution across genotypes (P < 0.01). Calves with inactive myostatin allele is an option to increase retail two copies of the inactive allele were more likely (P < product yield, but considerations of conditions at calv- 0.01) to die before weaning. Postweaning growth traits ing are important to prevent mortality. Key Words: Carcasses, Crossbred Cattle, Growth, Mortality, Myostatin 2004 American Society of Animal Science. All rights reserved. J. Anim. Sci. 2004. 82:2913–2918 Introduction cycle of this program (Cycle V), includes two tropically adapted breeds (Tuli and Boran) compared with Brah- The Germplasm Evaluation program at the U.S. man and the Belgian Blue breed, which has a high Meat Animal Research Center characterizes breeds frequency of double-muscling. Growth, carcass compo- representing several biological types of cattle. The fifth sition, and meat quality traits have been evaluated in two generations from this cycle (Wheeler et al., 2001; Casas and Cundiff, 2003). Evaluation of these traits is 1Mention of a trade name, proprietary product, or specified equip- important in establishing the potential value of alterna- ment does not constitute a guarantee or warranty by the USDA and tive germplasm resources in the beef industry; however, does not imply approval to the exclusion of other products that may be suitable. the effect of the inactive myostatin allele that causes 2The authors thank D. Brinkerhoff and B. Noll for technical assis- double muscling in Belgian Blue remained unevaluated tance and J. Watts for secretarial support. We also appreciate G. on numerous traits in this population. Hays, W. Smith, and the cattle crew for outstanding husbandry. Myostatin was first discovered in mice (McPherron 3 Correspondence: P.O. Box 166 (phone: 402-762-4168; fax: 402- et al., 1997), and was then identified in cattle as the 762-4173; e-mail: [email protected]). Received February 4, 2004. gene responsible for double muscling (Kambadur et al., Accepted June 23, 2004. 1997; McPherron and Lee, 1997; Grobet et al., 1998). 2913 2914 Casas et al. Several distinct mutations have been identified that Traits Analyzed explain the increased muscling in cattle (Grobet et al., 1998; Dunner et al., 2003). One of those mutations is Preweaning mortality was included in the study. To an 11-base pair deletion (Kambadur et al., 1997; Grobet obtain an unbiased estimate for the effect of myostatin, et al., 1998; Dunner et al., 2003) in the third exon of mortality was only evaluated in the Belgian Blue F2 the gene that results in the production of a truncated subpopulation (n = 154), consisting of offspring obtained × inactive protein. This allele has been associated with from the Belgian Blue British Breed sires mated to double muscling or muscle hypertrophy in several F1 cows from Belgian Blue grandsires. This Belgian breeds (Dunner et al., 1997; Kambadur et al., 1997; Blue F2 subpopulation is the only one in which offspring Wiener et al., 2002) and is fixed in the Belgian Blue can inherit two copies of the inactive myostatin allele. breed (Kambadur et al., 1997; Grobet et al., 1998; In all other crosses, it is impossible for the offspring to Dunner et al., 2003). The objective of this study was to inherit two copies of this allele. examine the potential association of the inactive myos- Traits analyzed for growth included birth weight, tatin allele with early calf mortality, and to determine weaning weight, postweaning ADG, and live weight the effect of this allele on growth and carcass composi- at slaughter. Carcass traits analyzed were hot carcass weight, fat thickness, LM area, estimated kidney, pel- tion traits in crossbred cattle from the Cycle V of the vic, and heart fat (percent), percentage of carcasses Germplasm Evaluation program. classified as USDA choice, marbling score, USDA yield grade (indicates the amount of usable meat from the Materials and Methods carcass; a yield grade of 1 yields the greatest percentage of retail product, 5 the least), retail product percent Animals and weight, fat percent and weight, and bone percent and weight. Retail product, fat, and bone yields were Casas and Cundiff (2003) provide a detailed explana- estimated using prediction equations that included car- tion of the population and its management. Briefly, cass yield grade traits (LM area, adjusted fat thickness, and estimated kidney, pelvic, and heart fat) and mar- animals for this study were produced by F1 cows. These bling score (Shackelford et al., 1995). F1 cows were produced by mating Hereford, Angus, and MARC III (¹⁄₄ Hereford, ¹⁄₄ Angus, ¹⁄₄ Pinzgauer, and ¹⁄₄ Red Poll) mature dams to Angus, Hereford, Tuli, Boran, Myostatin Genotyping Brahman, and Belgian Blue sires by AI. To avoid con- A saturated salt procedure (Miller et al., 1988) was founding sire breed effects with heterosis effects, no used to obtain DNA from ear notches (dead animals) purebred Hereford or Angus matings were made. Here- and blood (live animals). Blood samples were collected ford and Angus were treated as one group (British in 60-mL syringes with 7 to 10 mL of 4% (vol/vol) EDTA. Breeds). The F cows obtained from these crosses were 1 Blood was spun at 1,300 × g for 25 min, and buffy coats mated to Charolais, Belgian Blue × MARC III, Belgian were aspirated. Both tissues were frozen until DNA Blue × Angus, or Belgian Blue × Hereford sires during was extracted. Fahrenkrug et al. (1999) described the two consecutive years. Matings were made by multisire primers and amplification conditions. Samples were natural service mounting within sire breed. Individual electrophoresed in 3% agarose gels for 2,000 volt-hours. sires of progeny were not identified. All sires with Bel- Gels were stained with ethidium bromide and results gian Blue inheritance were treated as the same group recorded photographically. Animals were scored as hav- × (Belgian Blue British Breed). Offspring were born ing zero, one, or two copies of the inactive myostatin during spring of 1998 and 1999.
Recommended publications
  • "First Report on the State of the World's Animal Genetic Resources"
    Country Report of Australia for the FAO First Report on the State of the World’s Animal Genetic Resources 2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY................................................................................................................5 CHAPTER 1 ASSESSING THE STATE OF AGRICULTURAL BIODIVERSITY THE FARM ANIMAL SECTOR IN AUSTRALIA.................................................................................7 1.1 OVERVIEW OF AUSTRALIAN AGRICULTURE, ANIMAL PRODUCTION SYSTEMS AND RELATED ANIMAL BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY. ......................................................................................................7 Australian Agriculture - general context .....................................................................................7 Australia's agricultural sector: production systems, diversity and outputs.................................8 Australian livestock production ...................................................................................................9 1.2 ASSESSING THE STATE OF CONSERVATION OF FARM ANIMAL BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY..............10 Major agricultural species in Australia.....................................................................................10 Conservation status of important agricultural species in Australia..........................................11 Characterisation and information systems ................................................................................12 1.3 ASSESSING THE STATE OF UTILISATION OF FARM ANIMAL GENETIC RESOURCES IN AUSTRALIA. ........................................................................................................................................................12
    [Show full text]
  • Double Muscling in Cattle Due to Mutations in the Myostatin Gene
    Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA Vol. 94, pp. 12457–12461, November 1997 Genetics Double muscling in cattle due to mutations in the myostatin gene ALEXANDRA C. MCPHERRON AND SE-JIN LEE* Department of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 725 North Wolfe Street, Baltimore, MD 21205 Communicated by Daniel Nathans, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, August 26, 1997 (received for review August 12, 1997) ABSTRACT Myostatin (GDF-8) is a member of the trans- zebrafish (kindly provided by S. Fisher and M. Halpern, forming growth factor b superfamily of secreted growth and Carnegie Institution of Washington) skeletal muscle tissue as differentiation factors that is essential for proper regulation described (5). cDNA libraries were constructed in the lZAP of skeletal muscle mass in mice. Here we report the myostatin II vector (Stratagene) according to the instructions provided sequences of nine other vertebrate species and the identifica- by the manufacturer and screened without amplification. Rat tion of mutations in the coding sequence of bovine myostatin and baboon skeletal muscle cDNA libraries and a bovine in two breeds of double-muscled cattle, Belgian Blue and (Holstein) genomic library were purchased from Stratagene. Piedmontese, which are known to have an increase in muscle Library screening and analysis of clones were carried out as mass relative to conventional cattle. The Belgian Blue myo- described (5), except that the final washes were carried out in statin sequence contains an 11-nucleotide deletion in the third 25 mM sodium phosphate (pH 8.5), 0.5 M NaCl, 2 mM EDTA, exon which causes a frameshift that eliminates virtually all of and 0.5% SDS at 65°C.
    [Show full text]
  • ASPA 20Th Congress
    ASPA2013_cover_Layout 1 11/06/13 09.49 Pagina 1 Book of Abstracts j Official Journal of the Animal Science and Production Association (ASPA) ISSN 1594-4077 eISSN 1828-051X www.aspajournal.it Congress, Bologna, June 11-13, 2013 11-13, June Bologna, Congress, th Italian Journal ASPA ASPA 20 of Animal Science j 2013; volume 12 supplement 1 ASPA 20th Congress Bologna, June 11-13, 2013 Book of Abstracts Guest Editors: Andrea Piva, Paolo Bosi (Coordinators) Alessio Bonaldo, Federico Sirri, Anna Badiani, Giacomo Biagi, Roberta Davoli, Giovanna Martelli, Adele Meluzzi, Paolo Trevisi [email protected] supplement 1 Italian Journal of Animal 12, volume Science 2013; www.pagepress.org ASPA2013_book_Hrev_master 11/06/13 09.44 Pagina a Italian Journal of Animal Science Official Journal of the Animal Science and Production Association ISSN 1594-4077 eISSN 1828-051X Editorial Staff Editor-in-Chief Nadia Moscato, Managing Editor Rosanna Scipioni, Università di Modena e Reggio Emilia, Cristiana Poggi, Production Editor (Italy) Anne Freckleton, Copy Editor Filippo Lossani, Technical Support Section Editors Luca M. Battaglini, Università di Torino (Italy) Umberto Bernabucci, Università della Tuscia, Viterbo (Italy) Cesare Castellini, Università di Perugia (Italy) Beniamino T. Cenci Goga, Università di Perugia (Italy) Publisher Giulio Cozzi, Università di Padova (Italy) PAGEPress Publications Juan Vicente Delgado Bermejo, Universidad de Córdoba (Spain) via Giuseppe Belli 7 Luca Fontanesi, Università di Bologna (Italy) 27100 Pavia, Italy Oreste Franci, Università
    [Show full text]
  • Social Report 2007
    www.slowfoodfoundation.com SSocialocial RReporteport 22007007 TTablea b l e ooff ccontentso n t e n t s Editorial Team Andrea Amato, Serena Alaimo, Cristina Battaglino, Juan Decastelli, Mariana Guimaraes, John Ivring, Linda Kay, Valeria Melucci, Sandra Messick, Serena Milano, Raffaella Ponzio, Gianluca Pressi, Piero Sardo, Giada Talpo Translations Ronald Richards Photographs Slow Food Archive, ©ph Livio Bersano, Peter Blystone, Adriano Favole, Enrico Genovesi - FIAF, Nino Leto, © Digital–Miranda 2007, © Alberto Peroli, Paola Viesi 2007 Cover Photo Ethiopia, Paola Viesi 2007 Graphic design Claudia Saglietti Printing La Stamperia, Carrù (Cn, Italy) Printed on 100% recycled paper without use of whitening agents or ink removers. Issue closed 06-08, Financial analysis 2007 The Slow Food association 4 A movement of eco-gastronomes 4 Good, clean and fair 6 The Declaration of Puebla – Mexico The Slow Food Foundation for Biodiversity About us 9 The Slow Food Foundation for Biodiversity 10 Why the Foundation was created 11 Institutional structure 13 Operational structure and human resources What we do 17 Mission 18 Policies 19 Projects 19 Ark of Taste 21 Presidia 24 Presidia around the world 26 Italian Presidia 28 Earth Markets 29 International cooperation projects Financial Report 2007 30 Value added 33 Distribution of value added 34 Analysis of revenue Social Report 2007 35 Projects 35 Ark of Taste 36 Presidia 39 Economic, environmental and social outcomes of Presidia 42 A signifi cant new project for Italian Presidia 44 Some examples of international
    [Show full text]
  • Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture
    Publishing Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture Volume 41, 2001 © CSIRO 2001 . a journal publishing papers at the cutting edge of applied agricultural research All enquiries and manuscripts should be directed to: Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture CSIRO Publishing PO Box 1139 (150 Oxford Street) Collingwood, Vic. 3066, Australia Telephone: +61 3 9662 7614 Fax: +61 3 9662 7611 Email: [email protected] Published by CSIRO Publishing for the Standing Committee on Agriculture and Resource Management (SCARM) www.publish.csiro.au/journals/ajea Review Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture, 2001, 41, 893–919 Quantitative and molecular genetic influences on properties of beef: a review H. M. BurrowA, S. S. MooreB, D. J. JohnstonC, W. BarendseB and B. M. BindonD Cooperative Research Centre for Cattle and Beef Quality ACSIRO Livestock Industries, Box 5545, Rockhampton Mail Centre, Qld 4702, Australia; author for correspondence; e-mail: [email protected] BCSIRO Livestock Industries, Gehrmann Laboratories, University of Queensland, St Lucia, Qld 4072, Australia. CAnimal Genetics and Breeding Unit, University of New England/NSW Agriculture, Armidale, NSW 2351, Australia. DC. J. Hawkins Homestead, University of New England, Armidale, NSW 2351, Australia. Abstract. The scientific literature is reviewed to identify quantitative and molecular genetic influences on quantity and quality of beef. Genetic variation between breeds is of similar magnitude to genetic variation within breeds for many economically important traits. Differences between breeds are significant and large for most carcass and beef quality attributes, including beef tenderness, although differences for sensory juiciness and flavour are of little practical importance. For traits such as beef tenderness, between-breed differences may be more easily exploited than within-breed differences, because exceptional breeds are easier to identify than exceptional animals.
    [Show full text]
  • Accepted Manuscript
    Accepted Manuscript Prevalence, causes, resolution and consequences of bovine dystocia in Italy Ippolito De Amicis, Maria Cristina Veronesi, Domenico Robbe, Alessia Gloria, Augusto Carluccio PII: S0093-691X(17)30535-6 DOI: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2017.11.001 Reference: THE 14333 To appear in: Theriogenology Received Date: 4 April 2017 Revised Date: 6 September 2017 Accepted Date: 1 November 2017 Please cite this article as: De Amicis I, Veronesi MC, Robbe D, Gloria A, Carluccio A, Prevalence, causes, resolution and consequences of bovine dystocia in Italy, Theriogenology (2017), doi: 10.1016/ j.theriogenology.2017.11.001. This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain. REVISED ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 1 PREVALENCE, CAUSES, RESOLUTION AND CONSEQUENCES OF BOVINE 2 DYSTOCIA IN ITALY 3 4 Ippolito De Amicis a Maria Cristina Veronesi b* Domenico Robbe a Alessia Gloria a Augusto 5 Carluccio a 6 7 aFaculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Teramo, Località Piano d’Accio Teramo, Italy 8 bDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, Università degli Studi di Milano, via Celoria 10, 20133, 9 Milan, Italy 10 11 *Corresponding author: Department of
    [Show full text]
  • Birth and Weaning Traits in Crossbred Cattle from Hereford, Angus, Brahman, Boran, Tuli, and Belgian Blue Sires E
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Roman L. Hruska U.S. Meat Animal Research U.S. Department of Agriculture: Agricultural Center Research Service, Lincoln, Nebraska 2011 Birth and weaning traits in crossbred cattle from Hereford, Angus, Brahman, Boran, Tuli, and Belgian Blue sires E. Casas USDA, ARS, US Meat Animal Research Center, [email protected] R. M. Thallman USDA-ARS Meat Animal Research Center, [email protected] L. V. Cundiff US Meat Animal Research Center, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/hruskareports Casas, E.; Thallman, R. M.; and Cundiff, L. V., "Birth and weaning traits in crossbred cattle from Hereford, Angus, Brahman, Boran, Tuli, and Belgian Blue sires" (2011). Roman L. Hruska U.S. Meat Animal Research Center. 376. http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/hruskareports/376 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the U.S. Department of Agriculture: Agricultural Research Service, Lincoln, Nebraska at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Roman L. Hruska U.S. Meat Animal Research Center by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. Birth and weaning traits in crossbred cattle from Hereford, Angus, Brahman, Boran, Tuli, and Belgian Blue sires1,2 E. Casas,3 R. M. Thallman, and L. V. Cundiff US Meat Animal Research Center, USDA, ARS, Clay Center, NE 68933 ABSTRACT: The objective of this study was to char- tal survival and survival from birth to weaning (average acterize breeds representing diverse biological types for of 97.2 and 96.2%, respectively), with the exception of birth and weaning traits in crossbred cattle.
    [Show full text]
  • Proceedings of the 19Th ASPA Congress, Cremona, June 7-10, 2011
    Italian Journal of Animal Science ISSN: (Print) 1828-051X (Online) Journal homepage: https://www.tandfonline.com/loi/tjas20 Proceedings of the 19th ASPA Congress, Cremona, June 7-10, 2011 To cite this article: (2011) Proceedings of the 19th ASPA Congress, Cremona, June 7-10, 2011, Italian Journal of Animal Science, 10:sup1, 1-138, DOI: 10.4081/ijas.2011.s1 To link to this article: https://doi.org/10.4081/ijas.2011.s1 Copyright 2011 The Authors Published online: 24 May 2016. Submit your article to this journal Article views: 756 View related articles Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at https://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=tjas20 ASPA 19th Congress Cremona, June 7-10, 2011 Italian Journal of Animal Science 2011; volume 10: supplement 1 Agenda for oral presentations Tuesday June 7 - Animal breeding and genetics - Sala Maffei 14.00-14.15 Francesco Tiezzi, Mauro Penasa, Alessio Cecchinato, Christian Maltecca, Giovanni Bittante Genetic and environmental factors affecting fertility in Italian Brown Swiss cows .........................................................................C-001 14.15-14.30 Cristina Sartori, Roberto Mantovani Effects of inbreeding on fighting ability in Aosta Chestnut and Aosta Black Pied cattle.................................................................C-002 14.30-14.45 Mara Battagin, Mauro Penasa, Martino Cassandro Flow analysis of Holstein bulls daughters during progeny test...............................................................................................................C-003
    [Show full text]
  • Social Report 2009 Slow Food Foundation for Biodiversity
    www.slowfoodfoundation.com Social Report 2009 Slow Food Foundation for Biodiversity The Slow Food Foundation for Biodiversity has published the Social Report since 2006 to present its activities and their economic, social, environmental and cultural impact. The Social Report recounts a year of the Foundation’s work, not only in numbers but also through descriptions of activities and testimonials from individuals involved in these projects “ (producers, technical advisors, cooks, students, etc.) “ The Slow Food Foundation for Biodiversity 2009 Social Report can be downloaded in electronic format from the website www.slowfoodfoundation.com From May 30, 2010 it is possible to request a free print copy by sending an email to: [email protected] Main Office Slow Food Via della Mendicità Istruita, 14 - 12042 Bra (Cn) Italy Official Headquarters Georgofili Academy Piazzale degli Uffizi - 50122 Florence, Italy For more information please contact the Slow Food Foundation for Biodiversity: Phone: +39 0172 419701 - Fax: +39 0172 419725 [email protected] Editors Translations Cristina Battaglino, Eleonora Giannini, Serena Milano Ronald Richards, Simone Gie, Bess Mucke Editorial Team Issue closed 05–10, Financial analysis 2009 Serena Alaimo, Andrea Amato, Elena Aniere, Carlotta Baitone, Francesca Baldereschi, Francesca Barengo, Carlo Bogliotti, Silvia Cover Photo Ceriani, Léa Chauvin, Veronica Chesi, Daniela Conte, Progetto di educazione “Mangeons Local”, in Senegal Elisa Demichelis, Paolo Di Croce, Martina Dotta, Pierluigi Frassani- © Paola
    [Show full text]
  • The Relationship Between the Myostatin Gene And
    ABRI TECHNICAL The relationship between the UPDATE SERIES myostatin gene and calving ease in beef cattle: a review of published research literature M. L. Taylor | Agricultural Business Research Institute, Armidale NSW 2351 Abstract Double muscling is a hereditary genetic syndrome affecting cattle, and is most notably characterised by the extreme hypertrophy of muscles, occurring in most breeds of cattle. While the double-muscled phenotype has the benefit of increased yield over the hook with a larger percentage of higher priced cuts, it is also associated with reproductive issues. The relationship between double muscling and calving ease has been well documented, with a general consensus that the homozygous affected - genotype - with two mutated myostatin alleles - is unfavourable for calving ease and birth weight compared to heterozygous and normal contemporaries. Calving difficulty in double muscled cattle is related to a morphological imbalance between the dam and calf at time of birth, where the calf width and weight is increased in homozygous affected calves, or a decrease in the pelvic area of the dam, or both depending on the mating. Carriers of the double-muscling gene are not significantly different for calving ease compared to normal cattle, but performed significantly better for post-birth production traits. For commercial beef production these findings indicate the usefulness of genomic testing for the identification of individuals with double-muscling alleles, allowing mating schemes to be built to maximise production of heterozygous animals to benefit from improved yield and avoid reproductive disadvantage. Introduction different variations of mutation to produce the DM phenotype (Grobet et al., 1998). Double muscling (DM), or muscular hypertrophy, is a syndrome affecting cattle characterised While DM cattle have the benefit of increased phenotypically by hypertrophied muscles, yield over the hook, and the ability to produce a reduction in fat and reduction of skeletal weight higher percentage of premium cuts (Casas et al., (Arthur, 1995).
    [Show full text]
  • Lakeview-Piedmontese-Article-Cattle
    FEATURE In the fall of 2019, Lakeview Hutterite Colony built a new offsite state-of-the-art cattle housing By Connie Sieh Groop facility for ET recipient housing and calving. attle developed at the Lakeview process to develop meaningful EPDs but DEMANDS FROM SOCIETY Hutterite Colony near Lake Andes, the North American Piedmontese Associa- In the general beef industry, cattle pro- CS.D. provide enhanced beef genetics tion (NAPA) has dedicated great resources ducers are today at risk of losing more mar- in response to consumer demands. Those to building the data based on real mea- ket share to other proteins (both animal and looking for a healthy dining experience are surements and professional performance vegetable) largely because the consumer savoring the high-protein, low-fat genet- evaluations. “So, we now have some very wants a repeatable and enjoyable dining ically tender beef from Piedmontese cat- effective, breed-specific EPD tools to use in experience plus a low-fat healthful prod- tle for their tables. Cattle producers are selection. We are even working on a new uct that they can feel “good” about eating finding significant benefits in raising these genetic evaluation for feet and leg traits to from an environmental perspective. Pied- animals as well. launch a breed ‘Structure EPD.’ Our focus cross beef hits all of those targets because According to Jerry Hofer, the genet- has always been, and will always be, to keep it comes from a genetic feature unique to ics of the Piedmontese cattle originated building better cattle from the ground up.” them, not tied to any feeding or process- in Europe as an extremely muscled, These efforts are all about producing ing regime.
    [Show full text]
  • Ranking of Sire Breeds and Beef Cross Breeding of Dairy and Beef Cows
    CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by T-Stór RANKING OF SIRE BREEDS AND BEEF CROSS BREEDING OF DAIRY AND BEEF COWS M.G. Keane Teagasc, Livestock Systems Research Department, Animal & Grassland Research & Innovation Centre, Grange, Dunsany, Co. Meath. Occasional Series No.9 Grange Beef Research Centre March, 2011 Contents Page Summary…………………………………………………………………………….3 Introduction…………………………………………………………………………4 Relative performance of pure dairy and beef x dairy cattle……………………..5 Performance and carcass traits…………………….................................................5 Muscle growth and muscle yield traits......................................................................7 Meat quality...............................................................................................................7 Kill-out proportion, growth of non carcass parts and carcass composition…....7 Kill-out proportion.....................................................................................................7 Relative growth of non carcass parts........................................................................8 Carcass dimensions...................................................................................................9 Carcass weight distribution.......................................................................................9 Carcass composition.................................................................................................10 Chemical composition...............................................................................................10
    [Show full text]