Diplomatic and Consular List

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Diplomatic and Consular List DIPLOMATIC AND CONSULAR LIST MINISTRY OF FOREIGN AFFAIRS OF MONGOLIA DECEMBER 2016 1 Heads of Missions are kindly requested to communicate to the Director of Protocol all changes, relating to the staff members as may occur (arrival, departure, new address, etc.), so that modifications shall be included in the new edition of the Diplomatic and Consular List. Department of Diplomatic Protocol Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Mongolia Peace Avenue 7 A Ulaanbaatar 14210 Tel: (976-11) 26 26 13, 26 26 48, 26 29 62, 26 34 45, 26 25 61 Fax: (976-11) 32 29 64 E-mail: [email protected] Web-site: http://www.mfa.gov.mn/ 2 Updated to 06.12.2016 CONTENTS List of Countries maintaining Diplomatic Relations with Mongolia . 4 – 7 Ambassadors Extraordinary and Plenipotentiary . 8 – 11 Resident Ambassadors to Mongolia . 12 – 50 Non-Resident Ambassadors to Mongolia . 51– 152 Consular Posts . 153 – 157 Missions of International Organisations . 158 – 167 National Days . 168 – 174 3 LIST OF COUNTRIES MAINTAINING DIPLOMATIC RELATIONS WITH MONGOLIA 1. Russian Federation 05.11.1921 2. Democratic People’s Republic of Korea 15.10.1948 3. Republic of Albania 24.05.1949 4. People’s Republic of China 16.10.1949 5. Republic of Poland 14.04.1950 6. Republic of Bulgaria 22.04.1950 7. Republic of Hungary 28.04.1950 8. Romania 29.04.1950 9. Socialist Republic of Viet Nam 17.11.1954 10. Republic of India 24.12.1955 11. Union of Myanmar 26.09.1956 12. Republic of Indonesia 22.12.1956 13. Republic of Guinea 22.04.1960 14. Kingdom of Cambodia 30.11.1960 15. Republic of Cuba 07.12.1960 16. Kingdom of Nepal 05.01.1961 17. Republic of Mali 25.01.1961 18. Democratic People’s Republic of Algeria 25.06.1961 19. Democratic Socialist Republic of Sri Lanka 01.02.1962 20. Transitional Islamic State of Afghanistan 01.02.1962 21. Republic of Iraq 05.02.1962 22. Islamic Republic of Pakistan 06.07.1962 23. Lao People’s Democratic Republic 12.09.1962 24. United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland 23.01.1963 25. Arab Republic of Egypt 02.04.1963 26. Republic of Austria 01.07.1963 27. Republic of Finland 15.07.1963 28. Swiss Confederation 22.05.1964 29. Kingdom of Sweden 30.06.1964 30. Republic of France 27.04.1965 31. Republic of Ghana 07.12.1965 32. The Republic of the Congo 31.12.1966 33. United Republic of Tanzania 17.01.1967 34. Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia 24.01.1967 35. Republic of Greece 03.03.1967 36. Republic of Mauritania 30.06.1967 37. Syrian Arab Republic 31.07.1967 38. Kingdom of Norway 11.01.1968 39. Kingdom of Denmark 05.08.1968 40. Republic of Turkey 24.06.1969 41. Republic of Singapore 11.06.1970 42. The Central African Republic 18.06.1970 43. Republic of Italy 29.06.1970 44. Republic of Sudan 07.07.1970 45. Kingdom of Morocco 14.07.1970 46. Republic of Yemen 28.08.1970 47. The Somali Republic 28.02.1971 48. Islamic Republic of Iran 20.05.1971 49. Republic of Chile 01.06.1971 50. Kingdom of Belgium 08.07.1971 51. Argentine Republic 07.09.1971 52. Malaysia 08.09.1971 4 53. Federal Republic of Nigeria 21.09.1971 54. Japan 24.02.1972 55. Kingdom of the Netherlands 06.03.1972 56. People’s Republic of Bangladesh 28.06.1972 57. Australia 15.09.1972 58. Republic of the Philippines 11.10.1973 59. Canada 30.11.1973 60. Republic of Cyprus 19.12.1973 61. Federal Republic of Germany 31.01.1974 62. Kingdom of Thailand 05.03.1974 63. Republic of Iceland 04.06.1974 64. Republic of Portugal 26.07.1974 65. Democratic Republic of the Congo 04.02.1975 66. New Zeland 08.04.1975 67. State of Kuwait 17.06.1975 68. United Mexican States 24.09.1975 69. Republic of Mozambique 27.09.1975 70. Republic of Guinea-Bissau 14.10.1975 71. Democratic Republic of Sao Tomé and Principe 22.10.1975 72. Republic of Cape-Verde 19.11.1975 73. Republic of Angola 10.02.1976 74. Republic of the Fiji Islands 15.03.1976 75. Republic of Liberia 23.04.1976 76. Great People`s Socialist Libyan Arab Jamahiriya 16.06.1976 77. Papua New Guinea 16.06.1976 78. Grand Duchy of Luxembourg 11.07.1976 79. Republic of Tunesia 15.02.1977 80. Republic of Benin 02.04.1977 81. Republic of Costa Rica 06.06.1977 82. Spain 05.07.1977 83. Republic of Zambia 02.10.1978 84. State of Palestine 25.04.1979 85. Republic of Madagascar 11.05.1979 86. Republic of Malta 08.08.1979 87. Republic of Nicaragua 13.10.1979 88. Cooperative Republic of Guyana 15.12.1979 89. Grenada 25.07.1980 90. Hashimite Kingdom of Jordan 21.05.1981 91. Republic of Seychelles 21.08.1981 92. Republic of Ecuador 30.10.1982 93. Republic of Zimbabwe 30.08.1984 94. Kingdom of Lesotho 02.07.1985 95. Burkina Faso 25.10.1985 96. Republic of Maldives 06.11.1985 97. Republic of Senegal 12.12.1985 98. Republic of Côte d’Ivoire 06.07.1986 99. United States of America 27.01.1987 100. Federative Republic of Brazil 19.06.1987 101. Republic of Colombia 10.08.1988 102. Republic of Bolivia 01.03.1989 103. Republic of Korea 26.03.1990 104. Republic of Namibia 30.10.1990 105. Republic Bolivariana of Venezuela 14.12.1990 106. State of Israel 02.10.1991 5 107. Republic of Latvia 15.10.1991 108. Republic of Estonia 20.11.1991 109. Republic of Lithuania 11.12.1991 110. Ukraine 21.01.1992 111. Republic of Kazakhstan 22.01.1992 112. Republic of Belarus 24.01.1992 113. Republic of Uzbekistan 25.01.1992 114. Republic of Moldova 30.01.1992 115. Republic of Armenia 21.02.1992 116. Holy See 04.04.1992 117. Republic of Azerbaijan 16.04.1992 118. Kyrgyz Republic 22.04.1992 119. Turkmenistan 23.04.1992 120. Republic of Tajikistan 24.04.1992 121. Sultanate of Oman 27.04.1992 122. Georgia 12.05.1992 123. Brunei Darussalam 18.05.1992 124. Slovak Republic 01.01.1993 125. Czech Republic 01.01.1993 126. Republic of Slovenia 18.02.1993 127. Bosnia and Herzegovina 24.02.1993 128. Republic of Croatia 10.03.1993 129. Republic of South Africa 25.05.1994 130. Republic of Macedonia 27.06.1995 131. United Arab Emirates 01.04.1996 132. Republic of Peru 30.05.1997 133. Oriental Republic of Uruguay 07.10.1997 134. State of Qatar 21.01.1998 135. Lebanese Republic 05.02.1998 136. Liechtenstein 18.03.1998 137. Kingdom of Bahrain 16.05.1998 138. Ireland 22.12.1998 139. Republic of El Salvador 14.07.1999 140. Kingdom of Tonga 04.04.2000 141. Paraguay 17.06.2003 142. Timor - Leste 28.10.2003 143. Guatemala 03.07.2006 144. Crna Gora 01.02.2007 145. Serbia and Montenegro 01.02.2007 146. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia 12.02.2007 147. Republic of San Marino 25.04.2007 148. Principality of Monaco 22.05.2008 149. Dominican Republic 27.05.2010 150. Republic of Nauru 13.10.2011 151. Saint Vincent and the Grenadines 13.10.2011 152. Solomon Islands 13.10.2011 153. Commonwealth of Dominica 18.10.2011 154. Republic of Honduras 19.10.2011 155. Principality of Andorra 21.11.2011 156. Union of the Comoros 05.12.2011 157. Tuvalu 05.12.2011 158. Republic of South Sudan 20.12.2011 159. Republic of Malawi 21.12.2011 6 160. Independent State of Samoa 21.12.2011 161. Republic of the Gambia 22.12.2011 162. Republic of Panama 17.01.2012 163. Kingdom of Bhutan 18.01.2012 164. Republic of Kenya 22.03.2012 165. Jamaica 26.10.2012 166. Antigua and Barbuda 19.04.2013 167. Eritrea 24.06.2013 168. Republic of Burundi 08.07.2013 169. Togo –Togolese Republic 06.09.2013 170. Republic of Vanuatu 23.09.2013 171. Republic of Palau 25.09.2013 172. Republic of Suriname 27.09.2013 173. Republic of Sierra Leone 27.09.2013 174. Republic of Uganda 20.11.2013 175. Republic of Rwanda 25.11.2013 176. Federated States of Micronesia 06.12.2013 177. Republic of Haïti 14.01.2014 178. Republic of Kiribati 15.01.2014 179. Republic of Equatorial Guinea 20.02.2014 180. Republic of Chad 03.04.2014 181. Republic of Mauritius 03.07.2014 182. Republic of Gabon 15.09.2014 183. Saint Lucia 27.09.2014 184. Republic of Niger 25.03.2015 185. Republic of Cameroon 02.04.2015 186. Republic of the Marshall Islands 23.05.2015 187. The Federation of Saint Kitts and Nevis 12.04.2016 European Union* 1989.08.01* 7 AMBASSADORS EXTRAORDINARY AND PLENIPOTENTIARY Order of Precedence and Date of Presentation of Credentials 8 In Order of Presentation of Credentials H.E. Mr. Victor Sikonina (Madagascar) 04.12.2004 H.E. Mr. Coffie Alain N. Papatchi (Côte d’Ivoire) 26.04.2007 H.E. Mr. Sedozan Apithy Jean-Claude (Benin) 11.06.2008 H.E. Mr. Archbishop Osvaldo Padilla (Holy See) 25.06.2008 H.E. Mr. Roberto Di Serio (San Marino) 10.10.2008 H.E. Mr. Svein O.Saether (Norway) 07.10.2008 H.E.
Recommended publications
  • The Game for Regional Hegemony: China's Obor and India's Strategic Response
    Austral: Brazilian Journal of Strategy & International Relations e-ISSN 2238-6912 | ISSN 2238-6262| v.7, n.13, Jan./Jun. 2018 | p.159-196 THE GAME FOR REGIONAL HEGEMONY: CHINA’S OBOR AND INDIA’S STRATEGIC RESPONSE Anshuman Rahul1 Introduction The Chinese have always felt the historic ownership of the Silk Road and that was valiantly challenged by the former US Department of State, Hillary Clinton during her speech in Chennai, India on 20th July 2011 when she remarked, “’New Silk Road’ is a long-term vision of an international eco- nomic and transit network that links Central and South Asia, with Afghani- stan at its heart” (US Department of State 2011). The Chinese establishment was completely perplexed as Hillary Clinton had used the term Silk Road to explain the ‘US policy’. They considered as if they were being robbed of their history of more than 2000 years which signified their commercial ties with the outside world and provided a lifeline to Chinese economy. Source: Silkroutes.net (2017) 1 Assistannt Professor in Department of Political Science at RSP College, Jharia, Dhanbad (Vi- noba Bhave University), Jahrkhand, India. PhD from Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi, India. E-mail: [email protected]. 159 The Game for Regional Hegemony: China’s OBOR and India’s Strategic Response Ferdinand von Richthofen, a renowned German geographer and trav- eler in 1877 after his expedition to China had formally referred to the network of trade routes established by the Han dynasty as ‘Seidenstrasse’ (Silk Road) or ‘Seidenstrassen’ (Silk Routes). This network of trade routes had been in use since 130 BC but came to an abrupt end in 1453 AD as the Ottoman empire boycotted the trade with the west.
    [Show full text]
  • Evolution of China-Sri Lanka Relations
    Evolution of China-Sri Lanka Relations Ms. Gunjan Singh’s research interests include international relations, developments in China and space security. She has pursued her scholarship with various well known think tanks and has authored as well as edited many papers for national and international journals. Presently, she is an Associate Fellow at the VIF, New Delhi. — 2 — Evolution of China-Sri Lanka Relations Evolution of China-Sri Lanka Relations Introduction Over the last ten years China has been paying renewed attention to its ties with Sri Lanka. There has been a large rise in Chinese investments in various projects in Sri Lanka. Beijing has also diplomatically supported Colombo on various issues, especially on charges of human rights violations. In return, Sri Lanka has played an important role in helping China enhance its influence and prestige in the South Asian region. Notably, since taking over as president, Xi Jinping has accorded special focus to this relationship. Xi visited Sri Lanka in September 2014, the first visit by any Chinese President, in 28 years.1 A study of the growing Chinese involvement in Sri Lanka could be divided into two phases. The first would roughly coincide with the end of the Eelam War in May 2009 under President Rajapaksa, to the end of 2014. The next phase would constitute the period from January 2015 when Rajapaksa lost the election and Sirisena assumed the presidency, to till date. The period under Rajapaksa was marked by major initiatives to strengthen the relationship with China. The warmth between China and Sri Lanka grew after 2009 because China was one of the few countries that continued to supply arms and defence equipment to the Sri Lankan Army during its war against the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE).
    [Show full text]
  • China International Studies Printer: Beijing BOHS Color Printing Co., Ltd
    Advisors Tang Jiaxuan Li Zhaoxing Chairman Qi Zhenhong Deputy Chairmen Ruan Zongze Xu Jian Editor-in-Chief Ruan Zongze Executive Editors Jiang Zhida Wu Shaojie Senior Copy Editors William Jones Benjamin Green Members Shaun Breslin (UK) Dong Manyuan Guo Xiangang Liu Jiangyong Alexander Lukin (Russia) Qi Zhenhong Qin Yaqing Rong Ying Ruan Zongze Shi Ze Michael Swaine (US) Su Ge Wang Jisi Xing Guangcheng Xu Jian Yang Jiemian Yuan Jian Zhou Hong Patron: Ministry of Foreign Affairs, PRC Sponsor: China Institute of International Studies Publisher: Editorial Department of China International Studies Printer: Beijing BOHS Color Printing Co., Ltd. The views expressed in this journal are those of the individual authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of CIIS or the institutions to which the authors are attached. We sincerely welcome and appreciate submissions from scholars and specialists. Please send submissions to [email protected]. Those who wish to subscribe to the journal are invited to call the subscription service on 010-85119538 or to send an email to [email protected]. For further information, please visit our website: www.ciis.org.cn/gyzz. Number 72 • September/October 2018 Contents 5 New Developments of US-Russia Relations and China’s Policy Choice Feng Yujun & Shang Yue Instead of achieving a restart, the US-Russia relationship has fallen to freezing point under the Trump administration. The bilateral structural conflicts, with profound historical logic and realistic roots, have expanded from geopolitics and strategic balance to domestic politics and values. For a long time to come, “limited opponents” will become the “new normal” of US-Russia relations.
    [Show full text]
  • Ministry of Foreign Affairs Sri Lanka Annual Performance
    MINISTRY OF FOREIGN AFFAIRS SRI LANKA ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT 2017 MINISTRY OF FOREIGN AFFAIRS Contents Page No 1. Mission, Subjects and Functions of the Ministry of Foreign 1 Affairs 2. Preface 3 - 5 3. Organizational Chart of the Ministry 7 4. Progress Report of the Divisions - Africa Division 9 - 27 - Consular Affairs Division 29 - 35 - East Asia and Pacific Division 37 - 80 - Economic Affairs and Trade Division 81 - 88 - European Union, Multilateral Treaties and Commonwealth 89 - 95 Division - Finance Division 97 - 102 - General Administration Division 103 - 106 - Legal Division 107 - 112 - Middle East 113 - 134 - Ocean Affairs and Climate Change Division 135 - 142 - Overseas Administration Division 143 - 149 - Overseas Sri Lankan Division 151 - 154 - Policy Planning Division 155 - 157 - Protocol Division 159 - 167 - Public Communications Division 169 - 172 - South Asia and SAARC Division 173 - 184 - United Nations and Human Rights Division 185 - 192 - United States of America and Canada Division 193 - 201 - West Division 203 - 229 5. Network of Diplomatic Missions Abroad 231 6. Revenue collected by Sri Lanka Missions Abroad in 2017 233 - 235 7. Consular activities carried out by Sri Lanka Missions Abroad - 236 - 238 2017 Vision To be a responsible nation within the international community and to maintain friendly relations with all countries. Mission The Promotion, Projection and Protection of Sri Lanka’s national interests internationally, in accordance with the foreign policy of the Government and to advise the Government on managing foreign relations in keeping with Sri Lanka’s national interests. Subjects and Functions of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs Implementation of political plans and programmes in respect of Foreign Affairs; Representation of Sri Lanka abroad; International Agreements and Treaties; Foreign Government and international organization’s representation in Sri Lanka; External publicity; Diplomatic immunities and privileges and Consular functions.
    [Show full text]
  • Die Parlamentswahlen Vom 5. Dezember 2001 Und Die
    Marlies Salazar Die Parlaments- wahlen vom 5. Dezember 2001 und die Regierungsneu- bildung in Sri Lanka Am 5. Dezember 2001 fanden Überraschende Neuwahl in Sri Lanka vorgezogene des Parlaments in Sri Lanka Neuwahlen zum Parlament statt. Nach den gewalttätig- Obwohl das 11. Parlament von Sri Lanka erst am 10. sten Wahlen seit der Unab- Oktober 2000 gewählt wurde, also vor einem knap- hängigkeit dieses Landes pen Jahr, hat Präsidentin Kumaratunga am 11. Okto- hat Sri Lanka eine neue Re- gierung. Aufgrund des über- ber 2001 überraschend das Parlament aufgelöst und wältigenden Siegs der Oppo- Neuwahlen für den 5. Dezember 2001 anberaumt. Ihre sition sah Präsidentin Regierung hatte die Mehrheit verloren, und nachdem Chandrika Kumaratunga am 10. Oktober viele prominente Mitglieder ihrer sich genötigt, Oppositions- führer Ranil Wickreme- Partei von der Regierungsbank zur Oppositionsbank singhe zu bitten, Premier- überwechselten, wurde ihr klar, dass sie einem Miss- minister zu werden und eine trauensantrag diesmal nicht entgehen konnte. Um ihr neue Regierung zu bilden. Nach sieben Jahren Miss- Gesicht nicht zu verlieren, löste sie das Parlament wirtschaft durch die Peo- kurz nach Mitternacht am 11. Oktober 2001 auf und ple’s Alliance (PA) hat die setzte Neuwahlen für den 5. Dezember 2001 an. neue Regierung unter Die letzten Parlamentswahlen hatten wie gesagt Führung der United Natio- nal Party (UNP) ein schwe- erst ein Jahr zuvor stattgefunden. Damals hatte die res Erbe übernommen. People’s Alliance (PA), die 107 Sitze gewann (45,10 Schwerwiegende politische Prozent der Stimmen), den Sieg davongetragen. Zweit- und wirtschaftliche Pro- stärkste Partei wurde die United National Party (UNP) bleme müssen gelöst werden.
    [Show full text]
  • COMMENT 180 – Sino-Sri Lankan Relations and the Hambantota Port
    COMMENT COMMENT 180 – Sino-Sri Lankan relations and the Hambantota Port By Deshika Elapata 28 April 2020 - ISSN NUMBER: 2406-5617 Deshika Elapata is SADF’s Research Assistant. She graduated with a Master’s Degree in International Relations with a specialisation in Global Conflict in the Modern Era, from the University of Leiden in The Netherlands. Her dissertation focused on the (de) securitization of climate induced migration and the recognition of climate refugees. She obtained a Bachelor of Science Degree in Social Science from the University of Tilburg. She joined SADF after an internship at the European Institute for Asian Studies. Debt trap diplomacy? In Sri Lanka, the Hambantota Port project funded and initiated under the - government led by President Mahinda Rajapaksa in 2007, is by far the most salient project. China’s involvement and considerable impacts on the Sri Lankan economy since the 2000s are well documented (Panda, 2014, September; Chaudhury, 2019, December). Thus, and unsurprisingly, Sri Lanka is one of the many recipients of Chinese investment in infrastructure – notably, investment linked to the Belt and Road Initiative which started in 2013. The BRI, deemed – either out of contempt or approval -, a bold development project of our era, was introduced in 2013 by President Xi Jinping’s Government, claiming to promote multidimensional connectivity between China and Asia as well as other regions of the world (Wolf, 2019, p. v). The Hambantota Port project began as part of Sri Lanka’s own developmental plans. Mahinda Rajapaksa was keen on establishing a commercial port in the South of the island as it lay across vital sea lanes.
    [Show full text]
  • Forthwith? ெரன்பைதம், If Not, Why?
    194 වන කාණ්ඩය - 3 වන කලාපය 2010 ඔක්ෙතෝබර් 07 වන බහසපතින්දා් ெதாகுதி 194 - இல. 3 2010 ஒக்ேராபர் 07, வியாழக்கிழைம Volume 194 - No. 3 Thursday, 07th October, 2010 පාර්ලිෙම්න්තු විවාද (හැන්සාඩ්) பாராமன்ற விவாதங்கள் (ஹன்சாட்) PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES (HANSARD) නිල වාර්තාව அதிகார அறிக்ைக OFFICIAL REPORT (අෙශෝධිත පිටපත /பிைழ தித்தப்படாத /Uncorrected) අන්තර්ගත පධාන කරුණු ජනාධිපතිතුමාෙගන් ලත් සන්ෙද්ශය : මහජන ආරක්ෂක පකාශනය නිෙව්දන : කථානායකතුමාෙග් සහතිකය පශනවලට් වාචික පිළිතුරු විෙද්ශ කටයුතු පිළිබඳ අමාත ගරු මහාචාර්ය ජී. එල්. පීරිස ් මහතා ෙකෙරහි විශවාස් භංගත්වය : ෙයෝජනාව නිශපභ් විය. සභාව කල් තැබීෙම් ෙයෝජනාව: නූෙප්-ෙගොඩගම මාර්ගය පුළුල් කිරීෙම් වන්දි විෂමතා பிரதான உள்ளடக்கம் சனாதிபதியிடமிந் வந்த ெசய்தி: ெபாசனப் பாகாப்ப் பிரகடனம் அறிவிப்க்கள்: சபாநாயகர சான்ைர வினாக்கக்கு வாய்ல விைடகள் ெவளிநாட்டவல்கள் அைமச்சர் மாண்மிகு (ேபராசிாியர்) ஜீ.எல். பீாிஸ் அவர்கள்மீ நம்பிக்ைகயின்ைம : பிேரரைண ேதால்விற்ற ஒத்திைவப்ப் பிேரரைண: ப்ேப - ெகாடகம பாைத விஸ்தாிப்க்கான நட்டஈட் ரண்பா PRINCIPAL CONTENTS MESSAGE FROM THE PRESIDENT: Public Security Proclamation ANNOUNCEMENTS: Speaker’s Certificate ORAL ANSWERS TO QUESTIONS NO-CONFIDENCE IN HON. (PROF.) G.L. PEIRIS, MINISTER OF EXTERNAL AFFAIRS : Motion Negatived ADJOURNMENT MOTION: Discrepancy in Compensation in Widening of Nupe-Godagama Road 251 2010 ඔක්ෙතෝබර් 07 252 පාර්ලිෙම්න්තුව නිෙව්දන பாராமன்றம் அறிவிப்க்கள் ANNOUNCEMENTS PARLIAMENT —————–—- I 2010 ඔක්ෙතෝබර් 07 වන බහසපතින්දා් කථානායකතුමාෙග් සහතිකය 2010 ஒக்ேராபர் 07, வியாழக்கிழைம சபாநாயகர சான்ைர Thursday, 07th October, 2010 SPEAKER'S CERTIFICATE ———————————— කථානායකතුමා අ.
    [Show full text]
  • Conferences and Research
    Savidu Newsletter / Volume 02 / Issue 03 / September - December 2016 ‹ 1 Conferences and Research › Contribution to the National Development › Awards › News Publications › Award Ceremonies and Convocations › Sports › Community Celebrations Concerts and cultural Events › Student Activities › News Feature › Creative Writing Conferences and Research Building Bridges for Better Health The Annual Scientific Sessions 2017 of the Faculty of Medical Sciences which is one of symposium ‘Conquering the highlight events of the faculty took place on 24th and 25th of May 2017 at the Golden cancer’ needs to be Rose, Boralsgamuwa. This year the sessions were held as a joint collaboration with three acknowledged with sincere hospitals, the Colombo South Teaching Hospital, Sri Jayewardenepura General Hospital gratitude. and Base Hospital, Homagama. This year’s theme was ‘Building Bridges for Better Health’ which was especially adopted to emphasize the importance of connecting research and The enthusiasm shown clinical practice. The inauguration ceremony was held on 24th May 2017 which marked the by both the external and beginning of a remarkable experience. The oration was delivered by Prof. Sharaine Fernando, internal researchers was Professor, Department of Physiology, Faculty of Medical Sciences, USJ, on the effects of evident, judging from over toxic metals on human reproduction. The oration speech was indeed an excellent one that 100 abstracts received. was highly commended by the audience. Everyone also enjoyed the colorful, musical, and Two parallel sessions vibrant performances by graduates and undergraduates of the Faculty, and the fellowship were organized for oral that followed. presentations with the intention of providing The scientific programme took place on the following day and all participants experienced greater opportunities for a perfect blend of research and clinical developments presented by eminent experts who young researchers to were invited as resource personnel.
    [Show full text]
  • Sri Lanka Between Geopolitical Interests of China and India
    Sri Lanka between Geopolitical Interests of China and India A Seneviratne1, W Nalawatta2, S Weeraratne3 1Lecturer, Department of Strategic Studies, General Sir John Kotelawala Defence University, Sri Lanka 2Undergraduate, FaCulty of Law, General Sir John Kotelawala Defence University 3Undergraduate, FaCulty of Law, General Sir John Kotelawala DefenCe University [email protected] Abstract-Sri Lanka has become a point of interest in the hands of these matters, which was perhaps the idea Indian OCean in the 21st century due to her geo- behind the classical theory of neutralism. That was non- strategically attractive position. Precisely, the pearl of the involvement — remaining in splendid isolation. There is, Indian OCean is now in dilemma due to the Conflicting Hon. Senators would agree, a world of difference between interests of rising powers of Asia; India and China. India is this and non-alignment." (Prime Minister Sirimavo the mighty neighbour lying nearest to Sri Lanka. Both Bandaranaike on Sri Lanka’s Non-aligned Foreign Policy, countries have had crucial relationships from the past speech given to the Senate on 23 January 1964) Therefore days. For India, Sri Lanka Can impact on India’s strategiC the implications made by this speech were as, though Sri and seCurity interests. Thus India is reluctant to the Lanka was nonaligned, she did not play the role of a presence of another major power like China in Sri Lanka. neutral state. Despite that, Sri Lanka had close ties with On the Contrary, Sri Lanka lying on one of the busiest sea India from the ancient times and both countries shares routes has attained the eConomiC Companionship of China.
    [Show full text]
  • Renewable Energy in China
    No.3 2017 Vol. 561 Sponsored by CCPIT Since 1956 CHINA’S F REIGN TRADE SPECIAL ISSUE ON EXPO 2017 Future Energy Green Silk Road 国内邮发代号:80-799 国内刊号:CN11-1020/F 国际邮发代号:SM1581 国际刊号:ISSN0009-4498 http://www.ccpit.org Live Green Live Better Integrating Gardening into Nature Letting Nature Touch the Soul Beijing Expo 2019 April 29-October 7, 2019 Global Partners of Beijing Expo 2019 封底广告.indd 3 2017/6/8 21:15:55 http://cft.ccpit.org www.ccpit-cft.net.cn No. 3 2017 Vol. 561 4 Future Energy Green Silk Road. SPECIAL REPORT 4 Future Energy Green Silk Road 6 Promoting the “Belt and Road” Initiative through the World Expo Platform 8 Expo 2017, an Opportunitiy for Kazakhstan Developing Green Energy At the Zhejiang Day opening ceremony, 10 Astana World Expo-China Pavilion Preparation Memorabilia 18 economic and trade program signing ceremonies will be held between friendly 12 The Theme of China Pavilion business associations and enterprises. 14 Chinese Pavilion Events Arrangement LOCAL PART 18 Highlights of Zhejiang Day 22 Wonderful Expo, Green Shanxi 26 Guangdong Week 28 Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region Week ENERGY PART 31 China-Kazakhstan Energy Cooperation Ushers in Great Opportunities Renewable Energy Becomes 34 an Inevitable Choice for Global 32 “Silk Road” Links to “Bright Road”, Boosts China-Kazakhstan “Energy Transformation”. Cooperation in Broad Fields 34 Renewable Energy Becomes an Inevitable Choice for Global “Energy Transformation” 36 The Development Status of Renewable Energy in China 38 The “Silk Road Messenger” in China ENTERPRISE PART
    [Show full text]
  • The European Union Should Join the Belt and Road Initiative. Our Sole
    R2R We affirm, Resolved: The European Union should join the Belt and Road Initiative. Our sole contention is escaping the underdevelopment trap. China’s economy is slowing as its industry-driven growth levels off. In 2013, Chinese President Xi Jinping announced a solution: the massive infrastructure project he termed the Belt and Road Initiative. Zhang Peng at the Council on Foreign Relations writes in 2019: Chinese leaders are determined to restructure the economy to avoid the so-called middle-income trap, where wages go up and quality of life improves as low-skilled manufacturing rises, but countries struggle to then shift to producing higher-value goods and services. The BRI will offer new import and export options, creating new production chains that will spur the development of the Chinese economy. However, China’s stuttering economy may bring its grand ambitions down to earth. Professor Minxin Pei at Claremont Mckenna College explains in 2019: China's external environment has changed almost beyond recognition since Xi rolled out BRI in 2013. At that time, China foreign exchange reserves were approaching $4 trillion, which they used to invest in infrastructure. But, now, China's economic slowdown has triggered a capital flight, draining more than $1 trillion from its foreign exchange reserves. Some projects will have to be curtailed or even abandoned altogether. The EU must join the BRI now to save the sinking ship. Alicia García-Herrero at Bruegel writes in 2017: China cannot rely on its banks alone to finance such a gigantic plan. The key source of co-finance would logically be Europe.
    [Show full text]
  • Broader Horizons
    BROADER HORIZONS www.rsis.edu.sg February 2017 A Monthly Maritime Bulletin and Perspectives of the Maritime Security Programme at the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies Featured MSP Perspectives: Vietnam’s Shift from a Sea Denial Strategy in the South China Sea — p. 4 By Collin Koh Wikimedia Commons MSP Perspectives: Maritime Safety and Security: Vietnam’s Shift from a Sea Denial Strategy in the China mulls revision of maritime safety law South China Sea — p. 7 — p. 4 Naval Development and Policy: Shipping, Ports, and the Maritime Economy: U.S. carrier group patrols in tense South China S’pore shipyards ‘valued for expertise and track Sea record’ — p. 5 — p. 9 Broader Horizons — February 2017 1 Table of Contents MSP PERSPECTIVES 4 Vietnam’s Shift from a Sea Denial Strategy in the South China Sea 4 NAVAL DEVELOPMENT AND POLICY 5 U.S. carrier group patrols in tense South China Sea 5 Navy Puts Anti-Submarine Choppers into Service 5 No Chinese military activity at Hambantota Port in Sri Lanka, envoy assures 5 Mattis: US will defend Japanese islands claimed by China 5 US offered to deploy stealth destroyer in S. Korea: Seoul 5 DSNS delivers first SIGMA 10514 PKR to Indonesian MoD 6 India to impart submarine training to Indonesia 6 No reclamation at Panatag – DFA 6 S. Korean Military Dispatch Special Forces Unit to 5 Northwest Islands 6 Seaplane undergoing final tests 6 EXCLUSIVE-Japan to speed up frigate build to reinforce East China Sea - sources 6 China displays trimaran frigate design 6 Japan protests Russian military buildup
    [Show full text]