Devo INTR ODUCTIO on P Eozoic Atf Erlie a Vast Are Million 2 Son Bay. T

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Devo INTR ODUCTIO on P Eozoic Atf Erlie a Vast Are Million 2 Son Bay. T CA NADA G. TELFOR A BSTR RACT The M ose Riv er Basin is an in tracrat onic Paleoz oic sedim enta ry basi n un derlyin g th e Ja mes Bay L owland of n or theas tern Onta rio and containing strata rangin g from Ord dovicia n to Uppe r Devon ian age. Exce pt alo ng g th e mildly defo rmed d easte ern m argin st rata a re gene ra lly flat-lyi ing. Devonian carbon ates, sha les, evapori tes and mino ssic a nd Cretac eous clastic sediments o ve rlies the D evonian rocks inthe sout heastern pa rt of t he basin and the en tire region is blankete d by Pleist ocene glacial d eposits and Rec ent mari ne clays. Th e Devon ian suc cession com pris es, in asce nding order: Lower Devo nian Kenogam i R ver (upper part only; dolom mitic lim estone), St ooping River (mainly lim estone ) and Sextan s), M urray Islan d (lime tone) and W lli ams Island (s hal , carbo nates) Formation ; and the Up per Devoni n Long Ra pids Form ation (b lack shale, mudstone minor carbo nate s). The apparently s mple s tratigrap hy s com mpli cated by lateral fa cies variations, including a co ntinental to marine tr ansition am ong t he Low wer Devo INTR ODUCTIO ON P eozoic atf erlie a vast are million 2 son Bay. T ibute d amon r m ain te ctonic e lem viz. are distributed am se Riv er and oxe Ba ins, and th e Foxe Chan nel-H udson S trait gra ben syst em. How ever, D Devo- nian str ins. like the ot men f the atfor m, y the w which are nnel an d Strait , the Moose in is nn under lyi mes Bay tario (Fig. 1). A sm all segm extend s i nto the adjo eath he wate rs of J mes B ay. The underlies an are The M o2os e Rive r B ded approx of 05' a nd nd gitudes ti . M os t of t e on hore por ion of th basin is c harac- y a ve ry fla y, s parsely vegeta plain. ess is po oor, bei a single ine along the e tern margin of the low land ooson on Jam es B Bay. ossed by s al major north to no The re , includ evera ma or nort tagami rth- east flo vers merge ng t rm the Moos attagam i and farthe aib i (which m and Attaw api . O and farther n orth eozoic stricted t ps o f Paleozo or tribu ms. Th e River Basin (Fig. 1) is Th fault c ontrolled an def ined ph ysiogra north facing esca ment an d an abrupt chan ge from lly by a nort mpy cing escarpme nd weste s of the b asin (a ive y sharp d lowland are cambrian edim swamp rain west wland passes i nto the ma ange. H However, i he M ive r is cle rly separa ted f om the H Hu dson Bay Basin by a base- ment struc tur al hi gh refer red to the Cape Henrietta Maria A ch (Fig. 3). Th surf ace of this no thea st trending f eature is mark ed by an area of Ar chaean and Prote roz oic r ocks kno w n as the S utton L ak es Inlier. H owever, the a rch w as not a omplete ba rrier to Paleoz oic sedim entation and , in places contains a thin seq uenc e of Upper Ordo vician and Lower Sil urian limesto nes and ly on n Prec ambrian t erra in. sequence of Devonian stra the Moose R ver Basi ratigraphic r ips w ith the Moose Ri though d ins. Parts of ne e Devo nian se ens sive inves tigation lated by po ential hy dro- carbon and i with in min eral ated by pot entia sell and Telfor d, 1984; Ru ssell etal, 1985; es source on and ssell and Te 85). There efore, th e present pap s based on and Telfo revious rep orts, pa he ma tions of the Ge log ical S urv ey o f Canada (e.g ., Sanfo d an d Norris, 1975), as w ell as o n prelimi nar y re sults an d ongoing activitie REG IONAL GEO OLO GIC AL SETTING tent sedimen- tation ose ough m Bas h of Phane ite o f inte me. Nevertheles s, Copyright © 2009 by the CMaenmaodiira 11n234 S (o1c98ie8ty) of Petroleum Geologists. 124 Telford Paleozoic units is from Sanford and Norris (1975). relatively stable tectonic element, as evident by the thin Phanerozoic cover of less than 1000 m. Paleozoic strata range from Middle Ordovician to Upper Devonian age (Fig. 2) and consist of approximately 700 m of marine carbonates, shales, evaporites, and minor marine and continental clastic rocks. The Ordovician to Lower Silurian strata are confined to the western and northern margins of the basin so that, in much of the remainder of the region, the Upper Silurian or Devonian rocks rest directly and unconformably on Precambrian basement (Russell et al., 1985). Composite thickness of the Ordovician and Silurian strata is about 300 m. The former consist mainly of shallow marine or supratidal carbonates, probably representing a minor transgression from the northwest over the Cape Henrietta Maria Arch/The succeeding Lower Silurian sequence is dominated by marine carbonates consisting, in part, of a basin margin reef complex and associated carbon- ate units positioned along the southern side of the arch. The only Silurian strata that are reasonably widespread in the basin are those of the lower and middle members of the Kenogami River Formation. Devonian strata thus make up most of the Paleozoic stratigraphic sequence in the Moose River Basin. They have a composite thickness of about 400 m and extend through- out the central and eastern parts of the basin (Fig. 1). Through much of this area the Devonian rocks rest directly upon Precambrian basement. They are well exposed near the eastern margin of the basin, along the Abitibi and Mattagami Rivers, and much of the data used in this report and previous studies has been gathered from outcrops in this region. The Paleozoic rocks of the central Moose River Basin generally comprise undisturbed, flat-lying strata, except for beds affected by depositional dips around bioherms and reef complexes. However, basin marginal areas have expe- rienced significant tectonic activity and the Devonian sequence in particular is occasionally disturbed by faults and small scale folding. Recent studies suggest that several episodes of epeirogenic activity on the Hudson Platform affected the deposition and subsequent history of the Paleozoic rocks of the Moose River Basin. This produced several regional dis- conformities and the basin margin structural complexities. The epeirogenic events are thought to have been associated with horizontal plate movements along the southeast and northeast margins of the North American continent. San- ford (1987) has demonstrated the coincidence of Hudson Devonian Moose e R . Basin , Canad BFiagsuinr.e 2: Paleozoic and Mesozoic stratigraphic units in the Moose River Platform epeirogeny with plate movements during the Early to Middle Ordovician, Late Ordovician, Early Silurian, and Early and Late Devonian. Further tectonism, including emplacement of lamprophyric and kimberlitic intrusives in the Devonian strata of the southeastern Moose River Basin affected the region in the Middle to Late Jurassic. Devonian strata inthe southeastern part of the basin are unconformably overlain by units of Middle Jurassic (Mis- uskwia Beds) and Lower Cretaceous (Mattagami Forma- 125 tion) age (Fig. 2). These are probably the product of greater erosion of the adjoining Precambrian uplands due to tec- tonic events of that period. The Mesozoic deposits consist of a variable thickness of flat-lying, unconsolidated non- marine sands and mudrocks. The Mistuskwia Beds, charac- terized by coarse quartzose sands and varicolored clays, appear to be of predominantly lacustrine origin. The dis- conformably overlying Mattagami Formation consists of massive silica sands, kaolinitic mudrocks and minor gravel and lignite and formed in a high constructive, possibly anastomosed segment of a major river system draining an extensive tract of the Precambrian Shield from south to north (Telford and Long, 1986). Maximum known com- bined thickness of the Mesozoic units is 185 m. All of the Paleozoic and Mesozoic units are blanketed by a sequence of Pleistocene glacial and glaciolacustrine deposits, and Recent marine clays, peat and muskeg. These "overburden" sediments are of variable thickness, ranging up to 200 m. Their complex depositional history has only recently begun to be unravelled (see Shilts, 1986). PREVIOUS DEVONIAN STUDIES Much of the early geological work in the James Bay Lowland was related to lignite deposits (now known to be part of the Lower Cretaceous Mattagami Formation) on the banks of the Abitibi River near Onakawana, about 90 km south of Moosonee. Their occurrence was known as early as 1672 by the first English speaking settlers at Moose Factory (across the Moose River from the site of present-day Moos- onee). The earliest known report on the geology of the Hudson Bay territories was by Isbister (1855) but it was not until the late 19th and early 20th centuries that detailed investigations of the James Bay Lowland took place. Between 1871 and 1912 Robert Bell of the Geological Survey of Canada wrote 22 reports on the geology of the lands surrounding Hudson Bay, including aspects of the Devonian geology of the Moose River Basin.
Recommended publications
  • (De Beers, Or the Proponent) Has Identified a Diamond
    VICTOR DIAMOND PROJECT Comprehensive Study Report 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Project Overview and Background De Beers Canada Inc. (De Beers, or the Proponent) has identified a diamond resource, approximately 90 km west of the First Nation community of Attawapiskat, within the James Bay Lowlands of Ontario, (Figure 1-1). The resource consists of two kimberlite (diamond bearing ore) pipes, referred to as Victor Main and Victor Southwest. The proposed development is called the Victor Diamond Project. Appendix A is a corporate profile of De Beers, provided by the Proponent. Advanced exploration activities were carried out at the Victor site during 2000 and 2001, during which time approximately 10,000 tonnes of kimberlite were recovered from surface trenching and large diameter drilling, for on-site testing. An 80-person camp was established, along with a sample processing plant, and a winter airstrip to support the program. Desktop (2001), Prefeasibility (2002) and Feasibility (2003) engineering studies have been carried out, indicating to De Beers that the Victor Diamond Project (VDP) is technically feasible and economically viable. The resource is valued at 28.5 Mt, containing an estimated 6.5 million carats of diamonds. De Beers’ current mineral claims in the vicinity of the Victor site are shown on Figure 1-2. The Proponent’s project plan provides for the development of an open pit mine with on-site ore processing. Mining and processing will be carried out at an approximate ore throughput of 2.5 million tonnes/year (2.5 Mt/a), or about 7,000 tonnes/day. Associated project infrastructure linking the Victor site to Attawapiskat include the existing south winter road and a proposed 115 kV transmission line, and possibly a small barge landing area to be constructed in Attawapiskat for use during the project construction phase.
    [Show full text]
  • Iroquois Falls Forest Independent Forest Audit 2005-2010 Audit Report
    349 Mooney Avenue Thunder Bay, Ontario Canada P7B 5L5 Bus: 807-345- 5445 www.kbm.on.ca © Queen's Printer for Ontario, 2011 Iroquois Falls Forest – Independent Forest Audit 2005-2010 Audit Report TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 Executive Summary .......................................................................................................... ii 2.0 Table of Recommendations and Best Practices ............................................................... 1 3.0 Introduction.................................................................................................................. ... 3 3.1 Audit Process ...................................................................................................................... 3 3.2 Management Unit Description............................................................................................... 4 3.3 Current Issues ..................................................................................................................... 6 3.4 Summary of Consultation and Input to Audit .......................................................................... 6 4.0 Audit Findings .................................................................................................................. 6 4.1 Commitment.................................................................................................................... ... 6 4.2 Public Consultation and Aboriginal Involvement ...................................................................... 7 4.3 Forest Management Planning ...............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • An Assessment of the Groundwater Resources of Northern Ontario
    Hydrogeology of Ontario Series (Report 2) AN ASSESSMENT OF THE GROUNDWATER RESOURCES OF NORTHERN ONTARIO AREAS DRAINING INTO HUDSON BAY, JAMES BAY AND UPPER OTTAWA RIVER BY S. N. SINGER AND C. K. CHENG ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING AND REPORTING BRANCH MINISTRY OF THE ENVIRONMENT TORONTO ONTARIO 2002 KK PREFACE This report provides a regional assessment of the groundwater resources of areas draining into Hudson Bay, James Bay, and the Upper Ottawa River in northern Ontario in terms of the geologic conditions under which the groundwater flow systems operate. A hydrologic budget approach was used to assess precipitation, streamflow, baseflow, and potential and actual evapotranspiration in seven major basins in the study area on a monthly, annual and long-term basis. The report is intended to provide basic information that can be used for the wise management of the groundwater resources in the study area. Toronto, July 2002. DISCLAIMER The Ontario Ministry of the Environment does not make any warranty, expressed or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed in this report. Reference therein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the ministry. KKK TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 2. INTRODUCTION 7 2.1 LOCATION OF THE STUDY AREA 7 2.2 IMPORTANCE OF SCALE IN HYDROGEOLOGIC STUDIES 7 2.3 PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF THE STUDY 8 2.4 THE SIGNIFICANCE OF THE GROUNDWATER RESOURCES 8 2.5 PREVIOUS INVESTIGATIONS 9 2.6 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 13 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Petition to List US Populations of Lake Sturgeon (Acipenser Fulvescens)
    Petition to List U.S. Populations of Lake Sturgeon (Acipenser fulvescens) as Endangered or Threatened under the Endangered Species Act May 14, 2018 NOTICE OF PETITION Submitted to U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service on May 14, 2018: Gary Frazer, USFWS Assistant Director, [email protected] Charles Traxler, Assistant Regional Director, Region 3, [email protected] Georgia Parham, Endangered Species, Region 3, [email protected] Mike Oetker, Deputy Regional Director, Region 4, [email protected] Allan Brown, Assistant Regional Director, Region 4, [email protected] Wendi Weber, Regional Director, Region 5, [email protected] Deborah Rocque, Deputy Regional Director, Region 5, [email protected] Noreen Walsh, Regional Director, Region 6, [email protected] Matt Hogan, Deputy Regional Director, Region 6, [email protected] Petitioner Center for Biological Diversity formally requests that the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (“USFWS”) list the lake sturgeon (Acipenser fulvescens) in the United States as a threatened species under the federal Endangered Species Act (“ESA”), 16 U.S.C. §§1531-1544. Alternatively, the Center requests that the USFWS define and list distinct population segments of lake sturgeon in the U.S. as threatened or endangered. Lake sturgeon populations in Minnesota, Lake Superior, Missouri River, Ohio River, Arkansas-White River and lower Mississippi River may warrant endangered status. Lake sturgeon populations in Lake Michigan and the upper Mississippi River basin may warrant threatened status. Lake sturgeon in the central and eastern Great Lakes (Lake Huron, Lake Erie, Lake Ontario and the St. Lawrence River basin) seem to be part of a larger population that is more widespread.
    [Show full text]
  • 10.0 Description of Operating Plans
    Description of Operating Plans 10.0 DESCRIPTION OF OPERATING PLANS 10.1 Introduction This chapter presents the new operating plans for each facility on the Abitibi River, the end result of the Water Management Plan. For each facility, the operating regime is provided, listing the benefits, conflicts and Outstanding Information Gaps. Also provided is a target curve for each operating regime to graphically represent the operating plan. These operating plans are legally enforceable under the Lakes and Rivers Improvement Act (LRIA). Abitibi River Water Management Plan September 2004 10 - 1 Description of Operating Plans Abitibi River Water Management Plan September 2004 10 - 2 Description of Operating Plans 1.0 Watabeag Lake Dam (OPGI) Planning Team Consensus PAC Consensus Steering Committee Concurrence Selected Operating Option Operating Range: 319.00 – 321.70 m Absolute Range: 319.00 – 322.31 m Energy Emergency: None Summer Band: 320.57 – 320.82 m Victoria Day weekend to Thanksgiving weekend (new) Winter Drawdown: 319.00 m but target 319.62 m (new) Flood Allowance: 321.70 – 322.31 m Maximum Discharge: Maximum discharge limited to 17 cms at all times. Minimum Discharge: None Fisheries Constraint: None (new) Natural water level regime: N/A Others: Educate the public. Benefits: • This operating regime maintains appropriate Lake Trout habitat and the revised drawdown strategy will reduce the impact to Lake Trout. The existing drawdown limit of of 0.45 m from October to mid February was removed and replaced with a target to limit the drawdown to a minimum elevation 319.62 m. Although the minimum elevation of 319.00 m remains the absolute minimum to be used if necessary, the new drawdown target will generally result in higher water levels drawdown minimum.
    [Show full text]
  • FRESHWATER FISH in ONTARIO's BOREAL: STATUS, CONSERVATION and POTENTIAL IMPACTS of Development David R
    WCS CANADA CONSERVATION REPORT NO. 2 | AUGUST 2007 FRESHWATER FISH IN ONTARIO'S BOREAL: STATUS, CONSERVATION AND POTENTIAL IMPACTS OF dEVELOPMENT David R. Browne WCS CANADA CONSERVATION REPORT #2 AUGUST 2007 FRESHWATER FISH IN ONTARIO'S BOREAL: STATUS, CONSERVATION AND POTENTIAL IMPACTS OF DEVELOPMENT David R. Browne WCS Canada Conservation Reports: ISSN 1719-8941 Conservation Report (Print) ISSN 1719-8968 Conservation Report (Online) ISBN 978-0-9784461-1-6 Conservation Report (Print) ISBN 978-0-9784461-2-3 Conservation Report (Online) Copies of WCSC Conservation Reports are available at: www.wcscanada.org/publications Suggested citation: Browne, D.R. 2007. Freshwater fish in Ontario's bore- al: Status, conservation and potential impacts of development. Wildlife Conservation Society Canada Conservation Report No. 2. Toronto, Ontario, Canada. Cover photographs: Fish from top: northern pike – Engbretson Underwater Photography; stur- geon – Rob Criswell; brook trout – Mary Edwards; lake whitefish – © Shedd Aquarium, photo by Edward G. Lines; walleye – Engbretson Underwater Photography. Front cover landscape: Justina Ray; back cover: Carrie Sadowski, OMNR Copyright: The contents of this paper are the sole property of the authors and cannot be reproduced without permission of the authors. About Wildlife Conservation Society Canada (WCS Canada) WCS Canada's mission is to save wildlife and wildlands by improving our understanding of — and seeking solutions to — critical issues that threaten key species and large wild ecosystems throughout Canada. It both implements and supports comprehensive field studies that gather information on wildlife needs and seeks to resolve key conservation problems by working with a broad array of stakeholders, including local community members, conservation groups, reg- ulatory agencies, and commercial interests.
    [Show full text]
  • 115 Kv Transmission Line Stage 1 and 2 Archaeological Assessments April 27, 2012
    115 kV Transmission Line Stage 1 and 2 Archaeological Assessments April 27, 2012 DRAFT Stage 1 and 2 Archaeological Assessments 115 kV Transmission Line Geo. Townships of Glackmeyer, Clute and Calder District of Cochrane, Ontario Prepared for Hatch Ltd. 4342 Queen Street, Suite 500 Niagara Falls ON, L2E 7J7 Tel: (905) 374-0701 ext. 5313 Fax: (905) 374-1157 & The Ontario Ministry of Tourism and Culture By Archaeological Research Associates Ltd. 154 Otonabee Drive Kitchener, ON N2C 1L7 Tel: (519) 804-2291 Fax: (519) 954-4797 Licenced under P.J. Racher, M.A., CAHP MTC Licence #P007 Project #P007-378 PIF #P007-378-2011 28/11/2011 Original Report Stage 1 and 2 Archaeological Assessments,115kV Transmission Line Project, District of Cochrane i _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Under a contract awarded by Hatch Ltd. in June 2011, Archaeological Research Associates Ltd. carried out Stage 1 and 2 archaeological assessments of lands with the potential to be impacted by a proposed 115 kV Transmission Line project in the District of Cochrane, Ontario. This project report documents the background research and fieldwork involved in this assessment, and presents conclusions and recommendations pertaining to archaeological concerns within the project lands. The Stage 1 and 2 archaeological assessments were conducted in November 2011 under Ministry of Tourism and Culture licence #P007, PIF #P007-378-2011, and were governed by the Standards and Guidelines for Consultant Archaeologists (MTC 2011). The assessments were completed in advance of a Renewable Energy Approval application, in compliance with the requirements set out in Section 22 of Ontario Regulation 359/09 made under the Environmental Protection Act.
    [Show full text]
  • ONTARIO Lake Abitibi Islands
    .. ONTARIO Lake Abitibi Islands ~;;;;;;;.~_......,.1 Interim Management Statement PARKS ® Ontario 2007 ',;; APPROVAL STATEMENT I am pleased to approve this Interim Management Statement for Lake Abitibi Islands Provincial Park. Ontario's Living Legacy Land Use Strategy (OMNR 1999) identified this area as a nature reserve class provincial park. This park was regulated under the Provincial Parks Act in May of 2005 (0. Reg. 180105). This Interim Management Statement provides direction for the protection and management of Lake Abitibi Islands Provincial Park. February 12. 2007 Paul Bewick Date Zone Manager Northeast Zone Ontario Parks · . TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 Introduction 1 1.1 Objectives 1 2.0 Management Context 1 2.1 Environmental Assessment 5 3.0 Park Features and Values 5 3.1 Geological Features 5 3.2 Biological Features 5 3.3 Cultural Setting 5 3.4 Recreation 5 4.0 Aboriginal Uses 6 5.0 Stewardship Policies 6 5.1 Terrestrial Ecosystems 6 5.1.1 Harvesting 6 5.1.4 Wildlife Management 7 Hunting 7 Trapping 7 5.1.5 Industrial Resources 7 5.1.6 Access and Crossings 7 Access 7 Recreational Trails 7 5.1.7 Adjacent Land Management... 9 Forestry 9 Conservation Reserves 9 Provincial Parks 9 5.1.8 Land Disposition 9 Land Use Permits, Licenses of Occupation, and Unauthorized Occupations ......................................................................................................................9 Patent Land 9 Boat Caches 9 5.2 Aquatic Ecosystems 9 5.2.1 Water Management 9 5.2.2 Fisheries Management 10 Sport Fishing 10 Commercial Fishing 10 Commercial Baitfish Harvesting 10 Fish Stocking 10 6.0 Operations Policies 10 6.1 Recreation Management 10 6.1.1 Motorized Recreation 10 Motorboats 10 Aircraft 10 Snowmobiles 10 6.1.2 Non-Motorized Recreation 10 Hiking 11 Canoeing/Kayaking 11 6.1.3 Emerging Recreational Uses 11 6.2 Development 11 7.0 Cultural Resources 11 8.0 Heritage Education 11 9.0 Research 11 10.0 References 13 11.0 Appendix A: Background Information 14 Cultural Resources 17 Recreation & Tourism 17 ~ .
    [Show full text]
  • ABITIBI RIVER INDEPENDENT FOREST AUDIT 2010 – 2017 February 28, 2018
    1 ABITIBI RIVER INDEPENDENT FOREST AUDIT 2010 – 2017 February 28, 2018 © Queen’s Printer for Ontario, 2018 ABITIBI RIVER FOREST IFA: 2010–2017 TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of Contents........................................................................................................................................... i List of Tables ................................................................................................................................................. ii List of Figures ................................................................................................................................................ ii 1 Executive Summary............................................................................................................................... 1 2 Table of Findings and Best Practices..................................................................................................... 3 3 Introduction .......................................................................................................................................... 4 3.1 Audit Process ................................................................................................................................ 4 3.2 Management Unit Description ..................................................................................................... 5 4 Audit Findings ....................................................................................................................................... 6 4.1 Commitment ................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Letters F and T Refer to Figures Or Tables Respectively
    INDEX The letters f and t refer to figures or tables respectively "A" Marker, 312f, 313f Amherstberg Formation, 664f, 728f, 733,736f, Ashville Formation, 368f, 397, 400f, 412, 416, Abitibi River, 680,683, 706 741f, 765, 796 685 Acadian Orogeny, 686, 725, 727, 727f, 728, Amica-Bear Rock Formation, 544 Asiak Thrust Belt, 60, 82f 767, 771, 807 Amisk lowlands, 604 Askin Group, 259f Active Formation, 128f, 132f, 133, 139, 140f, ammolite see aragonite Assiniboia valley system, 393 145 Amsden Group, 244 Assiniboine Member, 412, 418 Adam Creek, Ont., 693,705f Amundsen Basin, 60, 69, 70f Assiniboine River, 44, 609, 637 Adam Till, 690f, 691, 6911,693 Amundsen Gulf, 476, 477, 478 Athabasca, Alta., 17,18,20f, 387,442,551,552 Adanac Mines, 339 ancestral North America miogeocline, 259f Athabasca Basin, 70f, 494 Adel Mountains, 415 Ancient Innuitian Margin, 51 Athabasca mobile zone see Athabasca Adel Mountains Volcanics, 455 Ancient Wall Complex, 184 polymetamorphic terrane Adirondack Dome, 714, 765 Anderdon Formation, 736f Athabasca oil sands see also oil and gas fields, Adirondack Inlier, 711 Anderdon Member, 664f 19, 21, 22, 386, 392, 507, 553, 606, 607 Adirondack Mountains, 719, 729,743 Anderson Basin, 50f, 52f, 359f, 360, 374, 381, Athabasca Plain, 617f Aftonian Interglacial, 773 382, 398, 399, 400, 401, 417, 477f, 478 Athabasca polymetamorphic terrane, 70f, Aguathuna Formation, 735f, 738f, 743 Anderson Member, 765 71-72,73 Aida Formation, 84,104, 614 Anderson Plain, 38, 106, 116, 122, 146, 325, Athabasca River, 15, 20f, 35, 43, 273f, 287f, Aklak
    [Show full text]
  • Current Research in the Geological Sciences in Canada, May 1980-April 1981 Projets De Recherche En Cours D'execution Au Canada - Sciences Geologiques
    GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PAPER 81-5 COMMISION GEOLOGIOUE ETUDE 81-5 CANADIAN GEOSCIENCE COUNCIL LE CONSEIL CANADIEN DES SCIENCES DE LA TERRE CURRENT RESEARCH IN THE GEOLOGICAL SCIENCES IN CANADA, MAY 1980-APRIL 1981 PROJETS DE RECHERCHE EN COURS D'EXECUTION AU CANADA - SCIENCES GEOLOGIQUES. MAI 1980-AVRIL 1981 Compiled by/Prepare par THOMAS E. BOLTON 1981 © Minister of Supply and Services Canada 1981 Available in Canada through authorized bookstore agents and other bookstores or by mail from Canadian Government Publishing Centre Supply and Services Canada Hull, Quebec, Canada KIA OS9 and from Geological Survey of Canada 60 l Booth Street Ottawa, Canada Kl A OE8 A deposit copy of this publication is also available for reference in public libraries across Canada Cat. No. M44-8 l/ 5E Canada: $4.00 ISBN 0-660-11003-2 Other countries: $4.80 Price subject to change without notice CONTENTS/TABLE DES MA TIERES v INTRODUCTION AREAL MAPPING, 1:50 OOO OR MORE DETAILED/ l CARTOGRAPHIE, 1:50 OOO OU A PLUS GRANDE ECHELLE l Alberta/ Alberta l British Columbia/Colombie-Britannique l Manitoba/Manitoba l New Brunswick/Nouveau-Brunswick 2 Newfoundland/Labrador /Terre-Neuve/Labrador 2 Northwest Territories/Territoires du Nord-Ouest 2 Nova Scotia/Nouvelle-Ecosse 2 Ontario/Ontario 3 Quebec 3 Saskatchewan/Saskatchewan 3 Yukon Territory/Territoire du Yukon AREAL MAPPING, LESS DETAILED THAN 1:50 OOO/ 3 CARTOGRAPHIE, A PLUS PETITE EC HELLE QU'AU 1:50 OOO 3 British Columbia/Colombie-Britannique 3 Manitoba/Manitoba 3 New Brunswick/Nouveau-Brunswick 3 Newfoundland/Labrador
    [Show full text]
  • North American Geology
    DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Hubert Work, Secretary U. S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY George Otis Smith, Director Bulletin 802 BIBLIOGRAPHY OF NORTH AMERICAN GEOLOGY FOR 1925 AND 1926 BY JOHN M. NICKLES UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE WASHINGTON 1928 ADDITIONAL COPIES OF THIS PUBLICATION MAT BE PROCURED FROM THE SUPERINTENDENT OF DOCUMENTS U. S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE WASHINGTON, D. C. AT 40 CENTS PER COPY CONTENTS Page Introduction. __ ______!____ _ _____________. 1 Serials examined_______________________________.. 3 Bibliography____________________________________ 9 Index______________________________________. 187 Lists________________________________________. 274 Chemical analyses______________________ ___ . 274 Mineral analyses_______________i_________________ . 276 Minerals described_____________________________. 276 Rocks described _______ _ . 278 Geologic formations described . 279 in BIBLIOGRAPHY OF NORTH AMERICAN GEOLOGY FOE 1925 AND 1926 By JOHN M. NICKLES INTRODUCTION The bibliography of North American geology, including paleon­ tology, petrology, and mineralogy, for the years 1925 and 1926 con­ tains publications on the geology of the Continent of North America and adjacent islands and on Panama and the Hawaiian Islands. It includes textbooks and papers of general character by American au­ thors, but not those by foreign authors, except papers that appear in American publications. The papers, with full title and medium of publication are listed under the names of their authors, which are arranged in alphabetic order. The author list is followed by an index to the literature listed. The bibliography of North American geology is comprised in the following bulletins of the United States Geological Survey: No. 127 (1732-1892); Nos. 188 and 189 (1892-1900); No. 301 (1901-1905); No. 372 (1906-7); No. 409 (1908); No. 444 (1909); No. 495 (1910); No.
    [Show full text]