DOCSLIB.ORG

FRESHWATER FISH in ONTARIO's BOREAL: STATUS, CONSERVATION and POTENTIAL IMPACTS of Development David R

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
FRESHWATER FISH in ONTARIO's BOREAL: STATUS, CONSERVATION and POTENTIAL IMPACTS of Development David R WCS CANADA CONSERVATION REPORT NO. 2 | AUGUST 2007 FRESHWATER FISH IN ONTARIO'S BOREAL: STATUS, CONSERVATION AND POTENTIAL IMPACTS OF dEVELOPMENT David R. Browne WCS CANADA CONSERVATION REPORT #2 AUGUST 2007 FRESHWATER FISH IN ONTARIO'S BOREAL: STATUS, CONSERVATION AND POTENTIAL IMPACTS OF DEVELOPMENT David R. Browne WCS Canada Conservation Reports: ISSN 1719-8941 Conservation Report (Print) ISSN 1719-8968 Conservation Report (Online) ISBN 978-0-9784461-1-6 Conservation Report (Print) ISBN 978-0-9784461-2-3 Conservation Report (Online) Copies of WCSC Conservation Reports are available at: www.wcscanada.org/publications Suggested citation: Browne, D.R. 2007. Freshwater fish in Ontario's bore- al: Status, conservation and potential impacts of development. Wildlife Conservation Society Canada Conservation Report No. 2. Toronto, Ontario, Canada. Cover photographs: Fish from top: northern pike – Engbretson Underwater Photography; stur- geon – Rob Criswell; brook trout – Mary Edwards; lake whitefish – © Shedd Aquarium, photo by Edward G. Lines; walleye – Engbretson Underwater Photography. Front cover landscape: Justina Ray; back cover: Carrie Sadowski, OMNR Copyright: The contents of this paper are the sole property of the authors and cannot be reproduced without permission of the authors. About Wildlife Conservation Society Canada (WCS Canada) WCS Canada's mission is to save wildlife and wildlands by improving our understanding of — and seeking solutions to — critical issues that threaten key species and large wild ecosystems throughout Canada. It both implements and supports comprehensive field studies that gather information on wildlife needs and seeks to resolve key conservation problems by working with a broad array of stakeholders, including local community members, conservation groups, reg- ulatory agencies, and commercial interests. It also provides technical assistance and biological expertise to local groups and agencies that lack the resources to address complex conservation issues. Major issues addressed to date include protected-area design, conservation-based land use planning, monitoring and management of wildlife and fish populations, recovery of endangered species, and impacts of climate change upon wildlife. WCS Canada is independently registered and managed in Canada, while retain- ing a strong collaborative working relationship with sister WCS programs in more than 55 countries. The Wildlife Conservation Society is a recognized global leader in conservation, dedicated to saving wildlife and wildlands in order to assure a future for threatened species, such as elephants, tigers, sharks, macaws and lynx. For more than a century, WCS has worked in North America promoting such concepts as bison reintroduction, park establishment and leg- islation to protect endangered wildlife. Today, WCS Canada draws upon this legacy of experience and expertise to inform its conservation programs from Yukon to Labrador. TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgements. 2 About the Author. 3 Executive Summary. 4 1. Introduction. 12 2. Freshwater Fishes of Northern Ontario. 19 2.1 Fish Diversity in Northern Ontario . 19 2.2 Freshwater Habitats of Northern Ontario . 19 2.3 Fish Communities of Northern Ontario . 22 2.3.1 Walleye and Pike Communities. 23 2.3.2 Lake Trout and Whitefish/Cisco Communities . 28 2.3.3 Brook Trout Communities .. ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... 36 2.3.4 Lake Sturgeon. 39 3. Resource Extraction in the Roadless Portion of Ontario. 43 3.1 Forestry . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 49 3.1.1 Effects of Forest Removal .. ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... 49 3.1.2 Logging Roads. 54 3.1.3 Reducing the Effects of Forestry on Aquatic Ecosystems. 57 3.2 Hydroelectric Dams . 58 3.2.1 Reservoir Creation . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 59 3.2.2 Barriers to Migration . 60 3.2.3 Flow Regime Changes .. ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... 61 3.2.4 Future Hydroelectric Development in Northern Ontario . 62 3.3 Mining. 64 3.3.1 Mine Effluent and Tailings . 64 3.3.2 Aquatic Habitat Alteration . 66 3.3.3 Road Access .. ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... 67 3.3.4 Regulatory Environment and Future Mine Development . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 67 3.4 Road Access and Recreational Fishing .. ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... 69 3.4.1 Overharvest Potential . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 70 3.4.2 Stocking . 72 3.4.3 Access and Fishing Quality . 72 4. Recommendations and Information Needs. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 77 4.1 Fish Ecology and Population Status . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 78 4.2 Reducing the Impacts of Resource Extraction .. ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... 80 Box 1: Mapping Current Impacts . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 46 Box 2: Transition from Commercial to Recreational Fishing in Northern Ontario . 73 Box 3: Climate Change . 75 Appendix I: Methods for Mapping Watershed Impacts (Box 1) . 84 References. 86 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Tremendous thanks are due to Dr. Justina Ray who conceived of the report and found the means to make it happen. The report benefited enormously from her ideas and her vision of the importance of aquatic environments in Ontario’s northern boreal region. This report was prepared while working as a research associate in the research group of Dr. Lauren Chapman in the Department of Biology, McGill University in a joint post-doc position with Wildlife Conservation Society Canada. A great deal of thanks is due to Lauren and fellow researchers, Erin Reardon, Jackie Paterson, and Sandra Binning, for creating a supportive and stimulating environment in which to work. Chris Chenier, Peter Colby, Lee Gerrish, Michele Glena, Tim Gray, Tom Johnston, Joan Kuyek, Nigel Lester, Jenni McDermid, George Morgan and Michael Sullivan provided invaluable comments on an earlier draft of the report. The report benefited greatly from their thorough reading and thought- ful analysis, as well as their insight as resource managers, conservationists and fisheries researchers. While comments from the many reviewers helped shape the document, the contents of the final report and the opinions expressed therein are the sole responsibility of WCS Canada. Several additional people shared their expertise and their data in prepara- tion of the report: Charles Hendry provided insight and information on lake sturgeon populations in Ontario; John Johnson provided some historical back- ground and current information on commercial fisheries in small inland lakes of Ontario; Len Hunt and Todd Eastman provided valuable insight into the recreational fishing industry of northern Ontario; and Enid Carlson shared her knowledge and information on the commercial fisheries of northern Ontario in the 1970s. Jenni McDermid contributed a box exploring the potential impacts of climate change on freshwater fish. Production of the maps for the report was made possible by the GIS wiz- ardry of Julee Boan and Gillian Woolmer. In particular, Julee Boan persevered through endless revisions and changes to the datasets to produce excellent final maps for the report. Thanks to the many individuals, credited herein, who con- tributed their beautiful photos to this report. Finally, this report and launching of WCS Canada's freshwater fish research and conservation initiative would simply not have been possible without the generous support of the EJLB Foundation, Ivey Foundation, and the Mc- Cutcheon Family Foundation. David R. Browne Wildlife Conservation Society CANADA | CONSERVATION REPORT no. 2 ABOUT THE AUTHOR David R. Browne completed this report while on contract with WCS Canada in 2006-2007. He is currently working as a policy analyst for the Canadian Wildlife Service in Ottawa while completing his doctorate in freshwater ecol- ogy at McGill University. His doctoral research was carried out in Alqonquin Park, Ontario and examined the food web dynamics of the interaction between brook trout and yellow perch. David holds a Masters degree in Geography and Geology in which he examined marine heavy metal pollution in Indonesia. He has co-authored a book chapter and three papers related to marine pollution and its effects on human health in Indonesia. David also holds a Masters degree in Environmental Studies in which he examined the policy-making process for air pollution and flood control in Los Angeles. Freshwater fish in Ontario's boreal: Status, conservation and potential impacts of development EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The French translation of this executive summary is available from http://www. wcscanada.org/publications or by e-mailing [email protected]. La sommaire exécutif est disponible à www.wcscanada.org/publications ou [email protected]. Freshwater ecosystems are among the most threatened ecosystems on the planet. Physical alteration, water withdrawal, overexploitation, pollution, and the introduction of non-native species have caused widespread habitat loss, degradation in water quality, declines in the abundance of aquatic animals, and biodiversity loss. More than 20 percent of the world’s 10,000 freshwater fish species have become threatened, endangered or extinct in recent decades. In Ontario, the area north of the current limit for forestry activities
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Attawapiskat Cree Land Use and State Intervention
    Attawapiskat Cree Land Use and State Intervention BRYAN CUMMINS Bolton, Ontario In this paper I will examine Attawapiskat Cree land use both historically and as it exists today. The intent is not to give an in-depth historical account, nor is it to be an exhaustive quantitative analysis. Rather, the objective is to look at the shifts in extent and nature of land use and how they may be related to Euro-Canadian incursion. This overview is offered as background to proposed field and archival work requested by the band. There are some underlying assumptions in this paper. First, it is taken as a given that the relationship that the Cree people have with the land is an essential part of their culture. As documented and explored by a number of researchers (Tanner 1979; Feit 1986), land use activities serve to integrate a complex web of economic, social, political and religious practices. It follows that to deny Cree (and other subarctic hunters) their relationship to the land is to deny them a fundamental right to their Cree-ness. From this assumption follows a second: that the Cree continue to have a considerable vested interest in the land. This is not an interest rooted solely in subsistence or in monetary economics, but also a cultural and ideological investment. Cree identity is still very much attuned to their land. While one may perceive land as a concrete entity for analytical purposes ("Fred was out on his land last week"), land or territory is fundamentally a part of greater social and cultural systems (as discussed in the paragraph above).
    [Show full text]
  • (De Beers, Or the Proponent) Has Identified a Diamond
    VICTOR DIAMOND PROJECT Comprehensive Study Report 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Project Overview and Background De Beers Canada Inc. (De Beers, or the Proponent) has identified a diamond resource, approximately 90 km west of the First Nation community of Attawapiskat, within the James Bay Lowlands of Ontario, (Figure 1-1). The resource consists of two kimberlite (diamond bearing ore) pipes, referred to as Victor Main and Victor Southwest. The proposed development is called the Victor Diamond Project. Appendix A is a corporate profile of De Beers, provided by the Proponent. Advanced exploration activities were carried out at the Victor site during 2000 and 2001, during which time approximately 10,000 tonnes of kimberlite were recovered from surface trenching and large diameter drilling, for on-site testing. An 80-person camp was established, along with a sample processing plant, and a winter airstrip to support the program. Desktop (2001), Prefeasibility (2002) and Feasibility (2003) engineering studies have been carried out, indicating to De Beers that the Victor Diamond Project (VDP) is technically feasible and economically viable. The resource is valued at 28.5 Mt, containing an estimated 6.5 million carats of diamonds. De Beers’ current mineral claims in the vicinity of the Victor site are shown on Figure 1-2. The Proponent’s project plan provides for the development of an open pit mine with on-site ore processing. Mining and processing will be carried out at an approximate ore throughput of 2.5 million tonnes/year (2.5 Mt/a), or about 7,000 tonnes/day. Associated project infrastructure linking the Victor site to Attawapiskat include the existing south winter road and a proposed 115 kV transmission line, and possibly a small barge landing area to be constructed in Attawapiskat for use during the project construction phase.
    [Show full text]
  • Iroquois Falls Forest Independent Forest Audit 2005-2010 Audit Report
    349 Mooney Avenue Thunder Bay, Ontario Canada P7B 5L5 Bus: 807-345- 5445 www.kbm.on.ca © Queen's Printer for Ontario, 2011 Iroquois Falls Forest – Independent Forest Audit 2005-2010 Audit Report TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 Executive Summary .......................................................................................................... ii 2.0 Table of Recommendations and Best Practices ............................................................... 1 3.0 Introduction.................................................................................................................. ... 3 3.1 Audit Process ...................................................................................................................... 3 3.2 Management Unit Description............................................................................................... 4 3.3 Current Issues ..................................................................................................................... 6 3.4 Summary of Consultation and Input to Audit .......................................................................... 6 4.0 Audit Findings .................................................................................................................. 6 4.1 Commitment.................................................................................................................... ... 6 4.2 Public Consultation and Aboriginal Involvement ...................................................................... 7 4.3 Forest Management Planning ...............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 28 Eagle's Nest: a Magmatic Ni-Sulfide Deposit in the James Bay
    © 2010 Society of Economic Geologists, Inc. Special Publication 15, pp. 539–557 Chapter 28 Eagle’s Nest: A Magmatic Ni-Sulfide Deposit in the James Bay Lowlands, Ontario, Canada JAMES E MUNGALL,†,1,2 JOHN D HARVEY,2 STEVEN J BALCH,3 BRONWYN AZAR1,2 JAMES ATKINSON,2 AND MICHAEL A HAMILTON1 1 Department of Geology, University of Toronto, 22 Russell St, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5S 3B1 2 Noront Resources Ltd, 105 Adelaide St West, Ste 110, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5H 1P9 3 Canadian Mining Geophysics Ltd, 11500 Fifth Ln, Rockwood, Ontario, Canada N0B 2K0 Abstract The Eagle’s Nest Ni-Cu-PGE deposit was discovered in the McFaulds Lake area of the James Bay lowlands of northern Ontario, Canada, in 2007 by Noront Resources Ltd. It is a magmatic sulfide deposit hosted by mafic and ultramafic rocks interpreted to be a feeder conduit beneath an extensive complex of sills and related volcanic rocks, which range in composition from dunite through ferrogabbro to rhyolite. The complex, called the Ring of Fire, has been dated at 2734.5 ± 1.0 Ma and it was emplaced into 2773.37 ± 0.9 Ma felsic plutonic rocks. The felsic rocks form a sill complex structurally beneath metasedimentary and metavolcanic rocks con- sidered to have formed along a passive margin at ca. 2800 Ma within the Oxford-Stull domain of the North Caribou superterrane in the Archean Superior province. In its original configuration, the Eagle’s Nest deposit formed in a shallowly plunging or subhorizontal keel structure at the base of a dike-like chonolith, but subsequent deformation has turned it into a vertically plung- ing rod of sulfide mineralization along the northwestern margin of a north-south–striking dike.
    [Show full text]
  • 5 Description of and Rationale for Alternatives
    Webequie Supply Road Environmental Assessment Terms of Reference 5 Description of and Rationale for Alternatives This section of the ToR provides a description of how and why project alternatives were developed, and a comparative screening of the alternative corridors considered to arrive at the corridor within which alignment options (alternative methods for implementing the Undertaking) will be considered to select the preferred option for assessment in the EA study and for more detailed engineering investigations and design development. 5.1 Range of Alternatives Considered The Ontario EA process requires that two types of project alternatives be considered: “alternatives to” the Undertaking (i.e., functionally different ways of addressing an identified problem or opportunity to arrive at the preferred planning solution) and “alternative methods” of carrying out the Undertaking (options for implementing the preferred planning solution). 5.1.1 Alternatives to the Undertaking The range of “alternatives to” the Project (i.e., functionally different ways of approaching the opportunities identified by Webequie First Nation to improve the community’s economic and social well-being) was limited by the primary objectives of the Project, as determined by Webequie First Nation: › Establish an all-season corridor that will facilitate the movement of materials, supplies and people between the Webequie Airport and the mineral exploration and proposed mine development activities in the McFaulds Lake area of Northwestern Ontario (specifically, the camps, the drilling/exploration projects and, in the future, mining facilities); › Provide enhanced employment and other economic development opportunities to Webequie community members, while also allowing them to continue to reside in or around their community’s traditional territory, engage in traditional uses of that land, and preserve their language and culture; and, › Provide experience/training opportunities for youth to help encourage pursuit of additional skills through post-secondary education.
    [Show full text]
  • Webequie Supply Road DETAILED PROJECT DESCRIPTION
    Webequie Supply Road DETAILED PROJECT DESCRIPTION Webequie First Nation The Picture is a Placeholder Only Prepared by: Prepared for: Submitted to: SNC-Lavalin Inc. Webequie First Nation Impact Assessment Agency of Canada 195 The West Mall Toronto, Ontario, M9C 5K1 www.snclavalin.com November 2019 661910 Webequie Supply Road Detailed Project Description PREFACE This Detailed Project Description for the Webequie Supply Road Project (“the Project”) has been prepared in accordance with subsection 15(1) of the Impact Assessment Act (“IAA”) and Schedule 2 of the Act’s Information and Management of Time Limits Regulations (“the Regulations”) of the Impact Assessment Act - Information Required in Detailed Description of Designated Project. In addition, the Detailed Project Description reflects the Webequie Supply Road Project Team’s recognition of issues identified in the Summary of Issues prepared by the Impact Assessment Agency of Canada (the Agency) as a result of the Agency’s invitation to Indigenous groups, federal and provincial authorities, the public and other participants to provide their perspective on any issues that they consider relevant in relation to the Project. Information provided by the Agency (posted on the Canadian Impact Assessment Registry) for this purpose included the Initial Project Description. The document that was accepted by the Agency to serve as the Initial Project Description was prepared to comply with the requirements of the Canadian Environmental Assessment Act, 2012 and was initially released for public review under the CEAA, 2012 process in July 2019, during the period when the Government of Canada was preparing to bring into force and transition to the new Impact Assessment Act.
    [Show full text]
  • Community Profiles for the Oneca Education And
    FIRST NATION COMMUNITY PROFILES 2010 Political/Territorial Facts About This Community Phone Number First Nation and Address Nation and Region Organization or and Fax Number Affiliation (if any) • Census data from 2006 states Aamjiwnaang First that there are 706 residents. Nation • This is a Chippewa (Ojibwe) community located on the (Sarnia) (519) 336‐8410 Anishinabek Nation shores of the St. Clair River near SFNS Sarnia, Ontario. 978 Tashmoo Avenue (Fax) 336‐0382 • There are 253 private dwellings in this community. SARNIA, Ontario (Southwest Region) • The land base is 12.57 square kilometres. N7T 7H5 • Census data from 2006 states that there are 506 residents. Alderville First Nation • This community is located in South‐Central Ontario. It is 11696 Second Line (905) 352‐2011 Anishinabek Nation intersected by County Road 45, and is located on the south side P.O. Box 46 (Fax) 352‐3242 Ogemawahj of Rice Lake and is 30km north of Cobourg. ROSENEATH, Ontario (Southeast Region) • There are 237 private dwellings in this community. K0K 2X0 • The land base is 12.52 square kilometres. COPYRIGHT OF THE ONECA EDUCATION PARTNERSHIPS PROGRAM 1 FIRST NATION COMMUNITY PROFILES 2010 • Census data from 2006 states that there are 406 residents. • This Algonquin community Algonquins of called Pikwàkanagàn is situated Pikwakanagan First on the beautiful shores of the Nation (613) 625‐2800 Bonnechere River and Golden Anishinabek Nation Lake. It is located off of Highway P.O. Box 100 (Fax) 625‐1149 N/A 60 and is 1 1/2 hours west of Ottawa and 1 1/2 hours south of GOLDEN LAKE, Ontario Algonquin Park.
    [Show full text]
  • 6 Existing Environmental Conditions in the Study Area 6.1 Study Area
    Webequie Supply Road Environmental Assessment Draft Terms of Reference 6 Existing Environmental Conditions in the Study Area 6.1 Study Area The Project is located in Northwestern Ontario, with the northern end of the road approximately 525 km northeast of Thunder Bay (refer to Figure 1.1). The Project is located on provincial Crown land, Webequie First Nation Reserve land under federal jurisdiction), and the traditional territories of Indigenous communities (refer also to Section 6.4.6 Land and Resource Use). Figure 6.1 illustrates the location of the alternative routes in relation to project area features and sensitivities. Due to confidentiality constraints (including those imposed by Webequie First Nation and Government of Ontario ministries), and the need to respect the wishes of potentially affected Indigenous communities with respect to divulging certain information on the use of lands in the project area, it is not possible to illustrate the location or bounds of a number of features and sensitivities, including First Nations’ traditional territories, individual camps/cabins, species at risk (e.g., caribou ranges), and government-regulated hunting areas (e.g., trapline licences). However, sensitive features and resources are described in general terms in this section of the ToR. The EA will summarize past investigations and analyses of alternative road alignments between Webequie and the mineral deposit area near McFaulds Lake, and will assess the potential impacts of alternative alignments in the preferred corridor for the Webequie Supply Road. The significance of an environmental impact partially depends on the geographic extent. As such, the impact assessment will be conducted on the basis of specific study areas related to the project development, adopting a multi-scale approach for describing baseline conditions (existing environment) and predicting effects from the Project.
    [Show full text]
  • An Assessment of the Groundwater Resources of Northern Ontario
    Hydrogeology of Ontario Series (Report 2) AN ASSESSMENT OF THE GROUNDWATER RESOURCES OF NORTHERN ONTARIO AREAS DRAINING INTO HUDSON BAY, JAMES BAY AND UPPER OTTAWA RIVER BY S. N. SINGER AND C. K. CHENG ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING AND REPORTING BRANCH MINISTRY OF THE ENVIRONMENT TORONTO ONTARIO 2002 KK PREFACE This report provides a regional assessment of the groundwater resources of areas draining into Hudson Bay, James Bay, and the Upper Ottawa River in northern Ontario in terms of the geologic conditions under which the groundwater flow systems operate. A hydrologic budget approach was used to assess precipitation, streamflow, baseflow, and potential and actual evapotranspiration in seven major basins in the study area on a monthly, annual and long-term basis. The report is intended to provide basic information that can be used for the wise management of the groundwater resources in the study area. Toronto, July 2002. DISCLAIMER The Ontario Ministry of the Environment does not make any warranty, expressed or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed in this report. Reference therein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the ministry. KKK TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 2. INTRODUCTION 7 2.1 LOCATION OF THE STUDY AREA 7 2.2 IMPORTANCE OF SCALE IN HYDROGEOLOGIC STUDIES 7 2.3 PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF THE STUDY 8 2.4 THE SIGNIFICANCE OF THE GROUNDWATER RESOURCES 8 2.5 PREVIOUS INVESTIGATIONS 9 2.6 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 13 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Petition to List US Populations of Lake Sturgeon (Acipenser Fulvescens)
    Petition to List U.S. Populations of Lake Sturgeon (Acipenser fulvescens) as Endangered or Threatened under the Endangered Species Act May 14, 2018 NOTICE OF PETITION Submitted to U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service on May 14, 2018: Gary Frazer, USFWS Assistant Director, [email protected] Charles Traxler, Assistant Regional Director, Region 3, [email protected] Georgia Parham, Endangered Species, Region 3, [email protected] Mike Oetker, Deputy Regional Director, Region 4, [email protected] Allan Brown, Assistant Regional Director, Region 4, [email protected] Wendi Weber, Regional Director, Region 5, [email protected] Deborah Rocque, Deputy Regional Director, Region 5, [email protected] Noreen Walsh, Regional Director, Region 6, [email protected] Matt Hogan, Deputy Regional Director, Region 6, [email protected] Petitioner Center for Biological Diversity formally requests that the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (“USFWS”) list the lake sturgeon (Acipenser fulvescens) in the United States as a threatened species under the federal Endangered Species Act (“ESA”), 16 U.S.C. §§1531-1544. Alternatively, the Center requests that the USFWS define and list distinct population segments of lake sturgeon in the U.S. as threatened or endangered. Lake sturgeon populations in Minnesota, Lake Superior, Missouri River, Ohio River, Arkansas-White River and lower Mississippi River may warrant endangered status. Lake sturgeon populations in Lake Michigan and the upper Mississippi River basin may warrant threatened status. Lake sturgeon in the central and eastern Great Lakes (Lake Huron, Lake Erie, Lake Ontario and the St. Lawrence River basin) seem to be part of a larger population that is more widespread.
    [Show full text]
  • Webequie Supply Road Project Description
    Webequie Supply Road PROJECT DESCRIPTION Webequie First Nation The Picture is a Placeholder Only July 2019 661910 Webequie Supply Road Project Description Table of Contents 1 General Information and Contacts .......................................................................... 1 1.1 Nature of Designated Project and Proposed Location ............................................................. 1 1.2 Proponent Contact Information ................................................................................................. 1 1.3 List of Parties Consulted During Preparation of the Project Description .................................. 2 1.4 Information Regarding Whether the Designated Project is Subject to Environmental Assessment/Regulatory Requirements of Another Jurisdiction ............................................... 5 1.5 Information Regarding Whether the Designated Project is Taking Place in a Region that has Been the Subject of an Environmental Study ........................................................................... 5 2 Project Information .................................................................................................. 7 2.1 General Description of the Project ............................................................................................ 7 2.2 Relevant Provisions in Regulations Designating Physical Activities Subject to CEAA .......... 10 2.3 Components and Activities of the Designated Project ........................................................... 10 2.4 Emissions, Discharges
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Introduction
    Webequie Supply Road Environmental Assessment Draft Terms of Reference 1 Introduction The purpose of this document is to present the Terms of Reference (ToR) for the Webequie First Nation Supply Road Project (“Webequie Supply Road”, “WSR”, “the Project”) to meet the requirements of the Ontario Environmental Assessment Act (EA Act). The ToR is a document that establishes the framework for the planning and decision-making process during the Environmental Assessment (EA) and is submitted by the proponent to the Minister of the Environment, Conservation and Parks (MECP) for review and approval. Alongside the ToR document, material to be submitted for the public record includes the Record of Consultation, which is a stand-alone written record that documents the engagement of and consultation with Indigenous (First Nation and Métis) communities, government agencies, the public, and stakeholders during the development of the ToR, including feedback received (comments, concerns, questions) and project team responses. The proposed Webequie Supply Road is a new all-season road of approximately 107 km in length from Webequie First Nation to the mineral deposit area near McFaulds Lake (also referred to as the Ring of Fire). A Location Plan for the Project is shown on Figure 1.1. The preliminary corridor for the road consists of a northwest-southeast segment running 51 km from Webequie First Nation to a 56 km segment running east before terminating near McFaulds Lake. A total of 17 km of the corridor is within Webequie First Nation Reserve lands. Based on the scale and complexity of the Project, and the potential for significant environmental effects, an Individual Environmental Assessment must be completed for approval under the EA Act.
    [Show full text]