DOCSLIB.ORG

TCRP Report 32

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

T R A N S I T C O O P E R A T I V E R E S E A R C H P R O G R A M SPONSORED BY The Federal Transit Administration TCRP Report 32 Multipurpose Transit Payment Media Transportation Research Board National Research Council TCRP OVERSIGHT AND PROJECT TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH BOARD EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE 1998 SELECTION COMMITTEE CHAIR OFFICERS MICHAEL S. TOWNES Peninsula Transportation Dist. Comm. Chairwoman: Sharon D. Banks, General Manager, AC Transit MEMBERS Vice Chairman: Wayne Shackelford, Commissioner, Georgia Department of Transportation GORDON AOYAGI Executive Director: Robert E. Skinner, Jr., Transportation Research Board Montgomery County Government SHARON D. BANKS AC Transit MEMBERS LEE BARNES Barwood, Inc. THOMAS F. BARRY, JR., Secretary of Transportation, Florida Department of Transportation GERALD L. BLAIR BRIAN J.L. BERRY, Lloyd Viel Berkner Regental Professor, Bruton Center for Development Studies, Indiana County Transit Authority University of Texas at Dallas SHIRLEY A. DeLIBERO SARAH C. CAMPBELL, President, TransManagement, Inc., Washington, DC New Jersey Transit Corporation E. DEAN CARLSON, Secretary, Kansas Department of Transportation ROD J. DIRIDON JOANNE F. CASEY, President, Intermodal Association of North America, Greenbelt, MD IISTPS JOHN W. FISHER, Director, ATLSS Engineering Research Center, Lehigh University SANDRA DRAGGOO GORMAN GILBERT, Director, Institute for Transportation Research and Education, North Carolina State CATA Un i v e r s i t y CONSTANCE GARBER DELON HAMPTON, Chair and CEO, Delon Hampton & Associates, Washington, DC York County Community Action Corp. LESTER A. HOEL, Hamilton Professor, Civil Engineering, University of Virginia ALAN J. GIBBS JAMES L. LAMMIE, Director, Parsons Brinckerhoff, Inc., New York, NY Rutgers, The State Univ. of New Jersey THOMAS F. LARWIN, General Manager, San Diego Metropolitan Transit Development Board DELON HAMPTON BRADLEY L. MALLORY, Secretary of Transportation, Pennsylvania Department of Transportation Delon Hampton & Associates JEFFREY J. MCCAIG, President and CEO, Trimac Corporation, Calgary, Alberta, Canada KATHARINE HUNTER-ZAWORSKI JOSEPH A. MICKES, Chief Engineer, Missouri Department of Transportation Oregon State University MARSHALL W. MOORE, Director, North Dakota Department of Transportation ALAN F. KIEPPER ANDREA RINIKER, Executive Director, Port of Tacoma Parsons Brinckerhoff, Inc. JOHN M. SAMUELS, VP—Operations Planning & Budget, Norfolk Southern Corporation, PAUL LARROUSSE Norfolk, VA Madison Metro Transit System LES STERMAN, Executive Director, East-West Gateway Coordinating Council, St. Louis, MO ROBERT G. LINGWOOD JAMES W. VA N LOBEN SELS, Director, CALTRANS (Past Chair, 1996) BC Transit MARTIN WACHS, Director, University of California Transportation Center, University of California GORDON J. LINTON at Berkeley Federal Transit Administration DAVID L. WINSTEAD, Secretary, Maryland Department of Transportation DON S. MONROE DAVID N. WORMLEY, Dean of Engineering, Pennsylvania State University (Past Chair, 1997) Pierce Transit PATRICIA S. NETTLESHIP EX OFFICIO MEMBERS The Nettleship Group, Inc. ROBERT E. PAASWELL The City College of New York MIKE ACOTT, President, National Asphalt Pavement Association JAMES P. REICHERT JOE N. BALLARD, Chief of Engineers and Commander, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Reichert Management Services ANDREW H. CARD, JR., President and CEO, American Automobile Manufacturers Association RICHARD J. SIMONETTA KELLEY S. COYNER, Acting Administrator, Research and Special Programs, U.S. Department of Transportation MARTA MORTIMER L. DOWNEY, Deputy Secretary, Office of the Secretary, U.S. Department of Transportation PAUL P. SKOUTELAS FRANCIS B. FRANCOIS, Executive Director, American Association of State Highway and Transportation Port Authority of Allegheny County Of f i c i a l s PAUL TOLIVER DAVID GARDINER, Assistant Administrator, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency King County DOT/Metro JANE F. GARVEY, Administrator, Federal Aviation Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation LINDA WATSON JOHN E. GRAYKOWSKI, Acting Maritime Administrator, U.S. Department of Transportation Corpus Christi RTA ROBERT A. KNISELY, Deputy Director, Bureau of Transportation Statistics, U.S. Department of Transportation EDWARD WYTKIND GORDON J. LINTON, Federal Transit Administrator, U.S. Department of Transportation AFL-CIO RICARDO MARTINEZ, National Highway Traffic Safety Administrator, U.S. Department of Transportation WALTER B. McCORMICK, President and CEO, American Trucking Associations, Inc. EX OFFICIO MEMBERS WILLIAM W. MILLAR, President, American Public Transit Association WILLIAM W. MILLAR JOLENE M. MOLITORIS, Federal Railroad Administrator, U.S. Department of Transportation APTA KAREN BORLAUG PHILLIPS, Senior Vice President, Association of American Railroads KENNETH R. WYKLE GEORGE D. WARRINGTON, Acting President and CEO, National Railroad Passenger Corporation FHWA KENNETH R. WYKLE, Federal Highway Administrator, U.S. Department of Transportation FRANCIS B. FRANCOIS AASHTO TRANSIT COOPERATIVE RESEARCH PROGRAM ROBERT E. SKINNER, JR. TRB Transportation Research Board Executive Committee Subcommittee for TCRP TDC EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR SHARON D. BANKS, AC Transit (Chairwoman) LOUIS F. SANDERS LESTER A. HOEL, University of Virginia APTA THOMAS F. LARWIN, San Diego Metropolitan Transit Development Board GORDON J. LINTON, U.S. Department of Transportation SECRETARY WAYNE SHACKELFORD, Georgia Department of Transportation ROBERT J. REILLY ROBERT E. SKINNER, JR., Transportation Research Board TRB DAVID N. WORMLEY, Pennsylvania State University T R A N S I T C O O P E R A T I V E R E S E A R C H P R O G R A M Report 32 Multipurpose Transit Payment Media DANIEL FLEISHMAN Multisystems, Inc. Cambridge, MA CAROL SCHWEIGER Multisystems, Inc. Cambridge, MA DAVID LOTT Dove Associates, Inc. Atlanta, GA and GEORGE PIERLOTT Mundle & Associates, Inc. Philadelphia, PA Subject Areas Public Transit Research Sponsored by the Federal Transit Administration in Cooperation with the Transit Development Corporation T R A N S P O R T A T I O N R E S E A R C H B O A R D NATIONAL RESEARCH COUNCIL NATIONAL ACADEMY PRESS Washington, D.C. 1998 TRANSIT COOPERATIVE RESEARCH PROGRAM TCRP REPORT 32 The nation’s growth and the need to meet mobility, Project A-14 FY’95 environmental, and energy objectives place demands on public ISSN 1073-4872 transit systems. Current systems, some of which are old and in need ISBN 0-309-06264-0 of upgrading, must expand service area, increase service frequency, Library of Congress Catalog Card No. 98-60315 and improve efficiency to serve these demands. Research is necessary to solve operating problems, to adapt appropriate new © 1998 Transportation Research Board technologies from other industries, and to introduce innovations into Price $36.00 the transit industry. The Transit Cooperative Research Program (TCRP) serves as one of the principal means by which the transit industry can develop innovative near-term solutions to meet demands placed on it. The need for TCRP was originally identified in TRB Special Report 213—Research for Public Transit: New Directions, published in 1987 and based on a study sponsored by the Urban Mass Transportation Administration—now the Federal Transit Administration (FTA). A report by the American Public Transit NOTICE Association (APTA), Transportation 2000, also recognized the need The project that is the subject of this report was a part of the Transit Cooperative for local, problem-solving research. TCRP, modeled after the Research Program conducted by the Transportation Research Board with the longstanding and successful National Cooperative Highway approval of the Governing Board of the National Research Council. Such Research Program, undertakes research and other technical activities approval reflects the Governing Board’s judgment that the project concerned is in response to the needs of transit service providers. The scope of appropriate with respect to both the purposes and resources of the National TCRP includes a variety of transit research fields including plan- Research Council. ning, service configuration, equipment, facilities, operations, human The members of the technical advisory panel selected to monitor this project and resources, maintenance, policy, and administrative practices. to review this report were chosen for recognized scholarly competence and with TCRP was established under FTA sponsorship in July 1992. due consideration for the balance of disciplines appropriate to the project. The Proposed by the U.S. Department of Transportation, TCRP was opinions and conclusions expressed or implied are those of the research agency authorized as part of the Intermodal Surface Transportation that performed the research, and while they have been accepted as appropriate Efficiency Act of 1991 (ISTEA). On May 13, 1992, a memorandum by the technical panel, they are not necessarily those of the Transportation agreement outlining TCRP operating procedures was executed by Research Board, the National Research Council, the Transit Development the three cooperating organizations: FTA;FTA, the National Academy of Corporation, or the Federal Transit Administration of the U.S. Department of Sciences, acting through the Transportation Research Board (TRB);(TRB), T r a n s p o r t a t i o n . and the Transit Development Corporation, Inc. (TDC), a nonprofit Each report is reviewed and accepted for publication by the technical panel educational and research organization established by APTA. TDC is according to
Recommended publications
  • Wayside Noise of Elevated Rail Transit Structures: Analysis of Published Data and Supplementary Measurements

    Wayside Noise of Elevated Rail Transit Structures: Analysis of Published Data and Supplementary Measurements

    HE )8# 5 ORT NO. UMTA-MA-06-0099-80-6 . A3 7 no. DOT- TSC- UMTA- 3n-4i WAYSIDE NOISE OF ELEVATED RAIL TRANSIT STRUCTURES: ANALYSIS OF PUBLISHED DATA AND SUPPLEMENTARY MEASUREMENTS Eric E. Unger Larry E. Wittig TRJ < of A , DECEMBER 1980 INTERIM REPORT DOCUMENT IS AVAILABLE TO THE PUBLIC THROUGH THE NATIONAL TECHNICAL INFORMATION SERVICE, SPRINGFIELD, VIRGINIA 22161 Prepared for U,S, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION RESFARCH AND SPECIAL PROGRAMS ADMINISTRATION Transportation Systems Center Cambridge MA 02142 x . NOTICE This document is disseminated under the sponsorship of the Department of Transportation in the interest of information exchange. The United States Govern- ment assumes no liability for its contents or use thereof NOTICE The United States Government does not endorse pro- ducts or manufacturers. Trade or manufacturers' names appear herein solely because they are con- sidered essential to the object of this report. i Technical Report Documentation Page 1 . Report No. 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient's Catalog No. UMTA-MA- 0 6-0099-80-6 4.^Jitle and Subtitle 5. Report Date WAYSIDE NOISE OF ELEVATED RAIL TRANSIT December 1980 STRUCTURES: ANALYSIS OF PUBLISHED DATA 6. Performing Organization Code AND SUPPLEMENTARY MEASUREMENTS DTS-331 8. Performing Organization Report No. 7. Author's) DOT-TSC-UMTA-80- 41 linger, Eric E.; Wittig, Larry E. 9. Performing Organization Name and Address 10. Work Unit No. (TRAIS) UM049/R0701 Bolt Beranek and Newman Inc.* Moulton Street 11. Contract or Grant No. 50 DOT-TSC Cambridge MA 02238 -1531 13. Type of Report and Period Covered 12 U.S. Department of Transportation Interim Report Urban Mass Transportation Administration July 1978-Oct.
  • 2018 Financial and CSR Report Attestation of the Persons Responsible for the Annual Report

    2018 Financial and CSR Report Attestation of the Persons Responsible for the Annual Report

    2018 Financial and CSR Report Attestation of the persons responsible for the annual report We, the undersigned, hereby attest that to the best of our knowledge the financial statements have been prepared in accordance with generally-accepted accounting principles and give a true and fair view of the assets, liabilities, financial position and results of the company and of all consolidated companies, and that the management report attached presents a true and fair picture of the results and financial position of the consolidated companies and of all uncertainties facing them. Paris, 29 March 2019 Chairwoman and CEO Catherine Guillouard Chief Financial Officer Jean-Yves Leclercq Management Corporate report governance Editorial 4 report Profile 6 The Board of Directors 89 RATP Group organisation chart 14 Compensation of corporate officers 91 Financial results 16 Diversity policy 91 Extra-financial performance Appendix – List of directors declaration 28 and their terms of office at 31 December 2018 91 International control and risk management 69 Consolidated Financial fi nancial statements statements Statutory Auditors’ report on the financial statements 156 Statutory Auditors’ report on the consolidated financial statements 96 EPIC balance sheet 159 Consolidated statements EPIC income statement 160 of comprehensive income 100 Notes to the financial statements 161 Consolidated balance sheets 102 Consolidated statements of cash flows 103 Consolidated statements of changes in equity 104 Notes to the consolidated financial statements 105 RATP Group — 2018 Financial and CSR Report 3 Editorial 2018 – a year of strong growth momentum and commitment to the territories served 2018 was marked by an acceleration in RATP Capital Innovation continues to invest the Group’s development in Île-de-France, in new shared mobility solutions and smart cities, in France and internationally.
  • A Bid for Better Transit Improving Service with Contracted Operations Transitcenter Is a Foundation That Works to Improve Urban Mobility

    A Bid for Better Transit Improving Service with Contracted Operations Transitcenter Is a Foundation That Works to Improve Urban Mobility

    A Bid for Better Transit Improving service with contracted operations TransitCenter is a foundation that works to improve urban mobility. We believe that fresh thinking can change the transportation landscape and improve the overall livability of cities. We commission and conduct research, convene events, and produce publications that inform and improve public transit and urban transportation. For more information, please visit www.transitcenter.org. The Eno Center for Transportation is an independent, nonpartisan think tank that promotes policy innovation and leads professional development in the transportation industry. As part of its mission, Eno seeks continuous improvement in transportation and its public and private leadership in order to improve the system’s mobility, safety, and sustainability. For more information please visit: www.enotrans.org. TransitCenter Board of Trustees Rosemary Scanlon, Chair Eric S. Lee Darryl Young Emily Youssouf Jennifer Dill Clare Newman Christof Spieler A Bid for Better Transit Improving service with contracted operations TransitCenter + Eno Center for Transportation September 2017 Acknowledgments A Bid for Better Transit was written by Stephanie Lotshaw, Paul Lewis, David Bragdon, and Zak Accuardi. The authors thank Emily Han, Joshua Schank (now at LA Metro), and Rob Puentes of the Eno Center for their contributions to this paper’s research and writing. This report would not be possible without the dozens of case study interviewees who contributed their time and knowledge to the study and reviewed the report’s case studies (see report appendices). The authors are also indebted to Don Cohen, Didier van de Velde, Darnell Grisby, Neil Smith, Kent Woodman, Dottie Watkins, Ed Wytkind, and Jeff Pavlak for their detailed and insightful comments during peer review.
  • Reassessing Public Transportation in a Post-Pandemic World

    Reassessing Public Transportation in a Post-Pandemic World

    Reassessing Public Transportation in a Post-Pandemic World Jeffrey Casello, Professor of Transportation Planning and Engineering, University of Waterloo William Towns, MES Planning, Region of Waterloo (Grand River Transit) Adam Fraser, MSc Civil & Environmental Engineering, Town of the Blue Mountains Readers interested in more information on this report are encouraged to contact the authors: [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Introduction Following a stretch of disinvestment in the postwar period, municipalities and regions around the world, but particularly in North America, have been actively re-investing in public transportation since the turn of the 21st century in order to achieve a variety of public goals. Specifically, this renewed emphasis on transit has aimed to: - Improve social equity by providing low-cost, effective access to a wider array of economic opportunities than might otherwise be available to all households, as well as quality-of- life-enhancing activities; - Decrease the energy and carbon intensity of personal travel and contribute to climate change mitigation efforts; - Influence land use to generate more compact, higher-density development that ultimately reduces the total need for and cost of travel (among other public utilities); - Lessen the negative environmental impacts of automobile-oriented transportation infrastructure and operations. The global pandemic stemming from the novel coronavirus (or COVID-19) has caused significant disruption to life in general and municipal service delivery in particular throughout 2020. While much remains unknown about the virus, it has become clear that COVID-19, like other socially- transmitted public health threats, is (in the absence of a vaccine) best mitigated by maintaining physical distance between individuals and avoiding mass gatherings at which illness may be transmitted widely.
  • Asia Pacific Rail Virtual Online 10-12 November 2020

    Asia Pacific Rail Virtual Online 10-12 November 2020

    Asia Pacific Rail Virtual Online 10-12 November 2020 For speaking opportunities, please contact Parveen Sekhon at [email protected] or +65 9015 3987. © Terrapinn Pte Ltd 2020. This is a preliminary agenda and is subject to change without prior notice. Please do not disseminate without permission. 2020 SPONSORS & EXHIBITORS Diamond Sponsors Platinum Sponsor Gold Sponsors Silver Sponsors Exhibitors © Terrapinn Pte Ltd 2020. This is a preliminary agenda and is subject to change without prior notice. Please do not disseminate without permission. Confirmed speakers: • Dr Jacob Kam, Chief Executive Officer, MTR Corporation, Hong Kong • Punit Agarwal, Chief Project Manager (Systems) at National High • Chua Chong Kheng, Deputy Chief Executive, Infrastructure & Speed Rail Corporation Ltd (NHSRCL), India Development, Land Transport Authority, Singapore • Russell McMullan, General Manager – CRL Assurance and • Michael Peter, CEO, Siemens Mobility, Germany Integration, City Rail Link Project, New Zealand • Rolf Härdi, Chief Technology Innovation Officer, Deutsche Bahn AG, • Marco Gallini, Head of Diagnostics and Maintenance Vehicles Germany Department, Rete Ferroviaria Italiana (RFI S.p.A.), Italy • Naoto Kimura, Director of International Relations Department, • Yanto Yulianto, Head of Signalling, Telecommunication and IT Tokyo Metro Co. Ltd., Japan Department, PT MRT Jakarta, Indonesia • Christian Schlehuber, Manager Governance CyberSecurity & Co- • Jeffrey Sim, Head of Rail Development and Acting Head of North Chair ER-ISAC, Deutsche
  • Dekalb County Transit Master Plan Final Report - August 2019

    Dekalb County Transit Master Plan Final Report - August 2019

    DeKalb County Transit Master Plan Final Report - August 2019 Prepared for Prepared by 1355 Peachtree St. NE Suite 100 Atlanta, GA 30309 What is DeKalb County’s Transit Master Plan? The Transit Master Plan’s purpose is to address DeKalb County’s mobility challenges, help to enhance future development opportunities, and improve the quality of life within each of DeKalb County’s cities and unincorporated communities, both north and south. The plan identifies transit service enhancements for today and expansion opportunities for tomorrow to create a 30-year, cost-feasible vision for transit investments in DeKalb County Table of Contents Table of Contents Chapter 1 Introduction ...................................................................................................................... 1-1 Background ............................................................................................................................. 1-1 Project Goals ........................................................................................................................... 1-1 Chapter 2 State of DeKalb Transit ................................................................................................. 2-1 History of DeKalb Transit ................................................................................................... 2-1 DeKalb Transit Today .......................................................................................................... 2-2 Current Unmet Rider Needs ............................................................................................
  • Payment Processing European Acquiring

    Payment Processing European Acquiring

    Payment Processing European Acquiring: Merchant Operating Guide Version 2.1 Latest Update 19-01-18 Paysafe Holdings UK Limited Page 1 <Document Name> Version <1.0> Paysafe Group Plc Date dd.mm.yyyy CONTENTS IMPORTANT INFORMATION ............................................................................. 3 PURPOSE OF THIS GUIDE .................................................................................. 3 CNP TRANSACTION (CARD NOT PRESENT (CNP) – E-COMMERCE, MAIL AND TELEPHONE ORDER ................................................................................................ 3 3D SECURE .................................................................................................................................................. 4 CARD SECURITY CODE (CSC)/ CARD VERIFICATION VALUE (CVC) AND ADDRESS ................................................. 4 NEGATIVE LIST .............................................................................................................................................. 5 ORDER VELOCITY MONITORING ....................................................................................................................... 5 IP ADDRESS AND BLOCK LISTS .......................................................................................................................... 5 FURTHER ADVICE ........................................................................................................................................... 7 SHIPPING GOODS AND PROVIDING SERVICES .......................................................................................................
  • Rapport Financier Et RSE 2019 3 « Plus Que Jamais, Le Groupe Place Au Cœur De Ses Valeurs La Performance Opérationnelle Et Économique, Mais Aussi

    Rapport Financier Et RSE 2019 3 « Plus Que Jamais, Le Groupe Place Au Cœur De Ses Valeurs La Performance Opérationnelle Et Économique, Mais Aussi

    RAPPORT FINANCIER2019 ET RSE Attestation des personnes assumant la responsabilité du rapport financier annuel Nous attestons que, à notre connaissance, les comptes sont établis conformément aux normes comptables applicables et donnent une image fidèle du patrimoine, de la situation financière et du résultat de la société et de l’ensemble des entreprises comprises dans le périmètre de consolidation, et que le rapport de gestion ci-joint présente un tableau fidèle de l’évolution des affaires, des résultats et de la situation financière de la société et de l’ensemble des entreprises comprises dans le périmètre de consolidation ainsi qu’une description des principaux risques et incertitudes auxquels elles sont confrontées. Paris, le 6 mars 2020 La présidente-directrice générale Catherine Guillouard Le directeur financier Jean-Yves Leclercq Édito 4 Le groupe RATP aujourd’hui 6 Nos expertises 8 Notre modèle de création de valeur 10 Organigramme du groupe RATP 12 Rapport Rapport de de gestion 13 gouvernement Résultats financiers 14 d’entreprise 89 Contrôle interne Composition du conseil et gestion des risques 26 d’administration et mandats 90 Déclaration de performance Rémunérations et avantages 92 extra-financière 48 Politique de diversité 93 Annexe 1 — Liste des administrateurs et de leurs mandats au 31 décembre 2019 93 Comptes Comptes consolidés 96 sociaux 158 Rapport des commissaires Rapport des commissaires aux comptes sur aux comptes sur les comptes consolidés 97 les comptes annuels 159 État du résultat global 101 Bilan Epic 162 Bilan consolidé 103 Compte de résultat Epic 163 Tableau des flux Annexe aux comptes sociaux 164 de trésorerie consolidés 104 Tableau de variation des capitaux propres 105 Annexe aux comptes consolidés 106 Groupe RATP — Rapport financier et RSE 2019 3 « Plus que jamais, le Groupe place au cœur de ses valeurs la performance opérationnelle et économique, mais aussi la responsabilité sociale Catherine Guillouard Présidente-directrice générale et environnementale.
  • LAST MILE CONNECTIVITY STUDY Draft Report

    LAST MILE CONNECTIVITY STUDY Draft Report

    LAST MILE CONNECTIVITY STUDY Draft Report Prepared for Prepared by In collaboration with Last Mile Connectivity Study | DRAFT REPORT February 2017 TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary ................................................................................................................................................ 1 1. Introduction ....................................................................................................................................................... 4 2. Background ...................................................................................................................................................... 8 A. Defining Last Mile Connectivity ....................................................................................................................... 8 B. Study Area ........................................................................................................................................................... 8 3. Study Process/Methodology ........................................................................................................................ 11 A. Prior Plans and Studies .....................................................................................................................................11 B. Project List ..........................................................................................................................................................11 C. Mapping Existing Facilities/Services and Previously Planned/Programmed Projects
  • GC Cabbie Nov 9 for PDF[1]

    GC Cabbie Nov 9 for PDF[1]

    I S S U E MONTHLY 9 N O V E M B E R 2 0 0 9 GC Cabbie this issue From the CEO CEO News P.1 Operational News P.2 Once again the Gold Coast has shown it’s resiliency in the face of global pressures; the media has essentially reported that we are now in the Marketing / Ombudsman Survey P.3 middle of a boom, the restaurants are busy, there are people out and Accounts P.4 about and the public are travelling again. Our figures have shown the same trend: bookings have increased over the last three months and Technical Services P .5 our hope is that the trend continues. Our Contact Centre Staff have Human Resources / Dreamworld Rank P.6 been under pressure as the calls have increased faster than antici- pated, thus, we have hired additional staff to assist with the Christmas Customer Feedback P.7 period. I would like to congratulate all of the Customer Service Reps Customer Feedback P.8 and Radio Operators for their efforts. Following on from a disappointing SuperGP we are heading into our traditionally busy period. Everyone within the Gold Coast Cabs group needs to ensure that we continue to provide exceptional customer service even when it is busy: • Smile • Be courteous • Be helpful (put the luggage / shopping into the car, open the door for the passenger etc) • Take pride in your work, car and appearance • Drive safely • Offer to change the radio station or to turn it off • Ask if they are comfortable, adjust / turn on the air-conditioning • Don’t speak on your mobile phone (even hands free) with passengers in the car • Be positive Do every job: every customer is to be treated equally, regardless of whether they are travelling around the cor- ner or going further.
  • Merchant Integration Guide

    Merchant Integration Guide

    PAYFORT Merchant Integration Guide Document Version: 10.0 July, 2019 PayFort PayFort Merchant Integration Guide Copyright Statement All rights reserved. No part of this document may be reproduced in any form or by any means or used to make any derivative such as translation, transformation, or adaptation without the prior written permission from PayFort Corporation. Trademark 2014-2019 PayFort ©, all rights reserved. Contents are subject to change without prior notice. Contact Us [email protected] www.PayFort.com 2014-2019 PayFort ©, all rights reserved 2 PayFort PayFort Merchant Integration Guide Contents 1. FORT in a Glimpse .......................................................................................................................... 11 2. About this Document ........................................................................................................................ 12 2.1 Intended Audience .................................................................................................................... 12 3. Request/ Response Value Type ....................................................................................................... 13 4. Before Starting the Integration with FORT........................................................................................ 14 5. Redirection ....................................................................................................................................... 15 Authorization/ Purchase URLs .................................................................................................
  • Government Pension Fund – Global Holding of Equities at 31 December 2007

    Government Pension Fund – Global Holding of Equities at 31 December 2007

    NORGES BA N K IN VESTME N T MA N AGEME N T ANNU A L REPO R T 2007 1 Government Pension Fund – Global Holding of equities at 31 December 2007 Europe Market value (NOK 1000) Ownership stake (per cent) Voting (per cent) Market value (NOK 1000) Ownership stake (per cent) Voting (per cent) AUSTRIA CROATIA Agrana Beteiligungs AG 7 370 0,092 0,092 Hrvatski Telekom dd 9 366 0,031 0,031 Andritz AG 44 606 0,261 0,261 A-TEC Industries AG 8 731 0,183 0,183 CYPRUS Austriamicrosystems AG 14 733 0,545 0,544 Bank of Cyprus Public Co Ltd 258 088 0,462 0,462 Austrian Airlines AG 4 904 0,115 0,115 Marfin Popular Bank Public Co Ltd 112 322 0,195 0,195 Boehler-Uddeholm AG 21 637 0,077 0,077 bwin Interactive Entertainment AG 23 914 0,346 0,346 CZECH REPUBLIC BWT AG 7 777 0,151 0,151 Philip Morris CR AS 23 736 0,364 0,364 CA Immo International AG 6 034 0,151 0,151 CA Immobilien Anlagen AG 34 729 0,328 0,328 DENMARK CAT Oil AG 4 798 0,082 0,082 A P Moller - Maersk A/S 921 847 0,363 0,433 Conwert Immobilien Invest SE 26 735 0,328 0,328 ALK-Abello A/S 13 504 0,209 0,230 Erste Bank der Oesterreichischen Sparkassen AG 729 685 0,599 0,599 Alm Brand A/S 7 943 0,125 0,125 EVN AG 62 871 0,219 0,219 Amagerbanken A/S 5 234 0,176 0,176 Flughafen Wien AG 19 884 0,151 0,151 Auriga Industries 3 080 0,123 0,175 Immoeast AG 173 045 0,355 0,355 Bang & Olufsen A/S 21 199 0,342 0,377 IMMOFINANZ AG 179 658 0,709 0,709 Bavarian Nordic A/S 3 610 0,148 0,148 Intercell AG 15 019 0,157 0,157 Biomar Holding A/S 2 573 0,112 0,112 Lenzing AG 3 475 0,033 0,033 Carlsberg A/S 97 282 0,199