Annex 1 Current Encod Membership – April 2014

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

ANNEX 1 CURRENT ENCOD MEMBERSHIP – APRIL 2014 HARM REDUCTION ORGANISATIONS - 6 ASSOCIAZIONE TILT – Italy AILAKET - Spain COLLETIVO INFOSHOCK – Italy Akzept e.V. - Germany DRUG PEACE INSTITUTE - Netherlands ALICE-PROJECT - Germany FHN – Norway Blue Point Drug Counseling and Outpatient Center – Forum Droghe – Italy Hungary INEIDFO - Germany BUNDESVERBAND DER ELTERN – Germany LEGALIZACE.CZ – Czech Republic FEDERACION ANDALUZA DE DROGODEPENDENCIAS LEGALIZE! – Netherlands Y SIDA ENLACE - Spain Liaison Antiprohibitioniste – Belgium Meres pour la Marijuana - France CONSUMER ORGANISATIONS, CANNABIS - 40 Netherlands Drug Policy Foundation - The Netherlands ACMEFUER – Spain Norml France – France AICC CANNABISCAFE – Spain Norml UK - UK AIRAM - Spain SNARROTIN – Iceland ALACANNABIS – Spain TILT ROMA - Italy ASARTE CLUB SOCIAL CANNABIS – Spain VEREIN LEGALIZE – Austria Asbl Sativa - Belgium VOC - Netherlands Asociación Club Calidad de Vida – Spain Asociación Casa María – Spain MEDIA - 9 Asociación Kali Club – Spain Cañamo – Spain ASSOCIAZIONE ASCIA - Italy Cannabis Magazine – Spain Bündnis Hanfparade e.V. - Germany Cannaclopedia - Belgium CANNABIS COLLEGE – Netherlands CANNAWEB.CH - Switzerland CANNABIS SANS FRONTIERES – France CANNAWEED – France Cannabis Social Club Maribor - Slovenia CANNAZINE – United Kingdom Chanvre et Libertés – France GONZOMEDIA - Netherlands CIRC NORD EST - France Radio K Centrale – Italy CLUB SOCIAL DE CANNABIS DE GRAZALEMA – Spain The Stoned Society - Netherlands CSC MA WEED PERSO - Belgium Deutscher Hanf Verband – Germany COMPANIES/SHOPS - 28 EHKEEF – Spain ABC, Netherlands EUSFAC - Spain ALCHIMIA - Spain FAC – Spain AZARIUS – Netherlands FCF – Switzerland BUSHDOCTOR – Austria FEDCAC – Spain CASA JUANITA – Spain Hanf Initiative - Germany COFFEESHOP COLOSSEUM - Netherlands GANJAZZ – Spain DE VERDAMPER – Netherlands Green Thumb asbl – Belgium DINAFEM SEEDS - Spain KONOPILEJEK – Czech republic DIOSA PLANTA – Spain Kreativ & Kulturverein “Legal – Europe” – Austria EASY GOING - Netherlands MACA - Spain GREEN HOUSE SEED COMPANY - Netherlands MAMBO SOCIAL CLUB – Belgium GROW IN BERLIN – Germany OSTERREICHISCHER HANF VERBAND – Austria CHANVRE INFO - Switzerland PANNAGH – Spain Mountain High - Netherlands PIC – Italy NEAR DARK - Germany PRIVATE CLUB OF CANNABIS – Spain NEW BALANCE – Netherlands Sibaritas Med Can – Spain ORGANIC EARTH - Netherlands TREKT UW PLANT – Belgium OTHALA BV – Netherlands UKCSC - UK PARADISE SEEDS – The Netherlands URJOGABARDEA – Spain PCN - Netherlands WEEDOUT - Belgium PLANTA DUCH DISTRIBUCIONES - Spain POLLINATOR - Netherlands CONSUMER ORGANISATIONS, OTHER DRUGS - 5 QUINTESSENTIAL TIPS Ltd - United Kingdom Amigos de la Hoja de Coca – Belgium SENSI SEEDS BV - Netherlands Brugerforeningen - Denmark SERIOUS SEEDS BV - Netherlands Drustvo Areal - Slovenia SPLIF - The Netherlands FAUDAS - Spain VLOS – The Netherlands MDHG Belangenvereniging Druggebruikers - Netherlands VOCM (Vereniging Officiële Coffeeshops Maastricht)- Netherlands ANTI-PROHIBITIONIST ORGANISATIONS – 18 ASSOCIACIÓ LLIURE ANTIPROHIBICIONISTA (ALA) – And 65 individual members Spain .

Copy Link

Recommended publications

Actors and Incentives in Cannabis Policy Change: an Interdisciplinary Approach to Legalization Processes in the United States and in Uruguay
1 UNIVERSIDADE DE SÃO PAULO INSTITUTO DE RELAÇÕES INTERNACIONAIS Fernanda Mena Actors and incentives in cannabis policy change: an interdisciplinary approach to legalization processes in the United States and in Uruguay São Paulo 2020 FERNANDA MELLO MENA 2 Actors and incentives in cannabis policy change: an interdisciplinary approach to legalization processes in the United States and in Uruguay Original Version Ph.D. Thesis presented to the Graduate Program in International Relations at the International Relations Institute, Universidade de São Paulo, Brazil, to obtain the degree of Doctor in Science. Advisor: Prof. Dr. Leandro Piquet Carneiro São Paulo 2020 Autorizo a reprodução e divulgação total ou parcial deste trabalho, por qualquer meio convencional ou eletrônico, para fins de estudo e pesquisa, desde que citada a fonte. 3 Catalogação na Publicação* Instituto de Relações Internacionais da Universidade de São Paulo Mena, Fernanda Actors and incentives in cannabis policy change: an interdisciplinary approach to legalization processes in the United States and in Uruguay / Fernanda Mello Mena -- Orientador Leandro Piquet Carneiro. São Paulo: 2020. 195p. Tese (doutorado). Universidade de São Paulo. Instituto de Relações Internacionais. 1. Relações exteriores (História) – Brasil 2. Relações internacionais (História) - Brasil 3. Política externa – Brasil I. Mena, Fernanda II. Actors and incentives in cannabis policy change: an interdisciplinary approach to legalization processes in the United States and in Uruguay CDD 327.81 4 MENA, Fernanda Actors and incentives in cannabis policy change: an interdisciplinary approach to legalization processes in the United States and in Uruguay Ph. D. Thesis presented to the International Relations Institute, at the University of São Paulo, Brazil, to obtain the degree of Doctor in Science.
[Show full text]
The Following Statement Was Organized by Drcnet Foundation (Also Known As "Stopthedrugwar.Org"), an NGO in Consultative Status with ECOSOC Since 2016
The following statement was organized by DRCNet Foundation (also known as "StoptheDrugWar.org"), an NGO in consultative status with ECOSOC since 2016. It was submitted to the United Nations as a contribution to the 60th Session of the Commission on Narcotic Drugs. This copy provides an updated list of signatories. Please visit http://stopthedrugwar.org/global for updates and other info. (Note that organizations listed with an asterisk were added subsequent to the session and statement distribution.) March 13, 2017 We the undersigned believe the UNGASS Outcome Document stopped short of crucial and widely supported reforms, while avoiding new realities.1 We call on the 60th CND to: Acknowledge the Ramifications of New Drug Policies Clarify that "commitment to… the three international drug control conventions" 2 does not mean these treaties, written between 28 and 56 years ago, should remain unchanged.3 Convene an "Expert Advisory Group" to study tensions in the drug control regime.4 Stand Up for Human Rights Assert that nations' drug policies should be constrained by human rights norms; with special attention on racial disparities, indigenous rights, and impact on women and youth.5 6 7 8 Call for abolishing the death penalty for drug offenses.9 Call for a People-Centered Approach to Drug Policy Explicitly endorse harm reduction and shifting resources to fund it.10 Assert the Sustainable Development Goals should both inform and constrain drug policy.11 Direct WHO to complete a Critical Review of cannabis, including rescheduling options.12 Take a Stronger Stance on Criminal Justice Reform Encourage bold steps away from criminalization.13 Advocate a diverse range of alternatives to incarceration, including Law Enforcement Assisted Diversion, as well as sentencing reform and other compassionate reforms.14 Advocate that regulatory approaches be considered for new psychoactive substances.15 Foster Open Dialogue Structure future UN meetings to enable truly open debate.
[Show full text]
Journal 4 Revised
UNITED NATIONS J O U R N A L Commission on Narcotic Drugs Fifty-ninth session Vienna, 14-22 March 2016 No. 4 SCHEDULE OF MEETINGS — THURSDAY, 17 MARCH 2016 COMMISSION ON NARCOTIC DRUGS, FIFTY-NINTH SESSION, REGULAR SEGMENT 10 a.m. Plenary, seventh meeting Plenary Hall M-Building Item 5. Implementation of the Political Declaration and Plan of Action on International Cooperation towards an Integrated and Balanced Strategy to Counter the World Drug Problem: follow-up to the high-level review by the Commission on Narcotic Drugs, in view of the special session of the General Assembly on the world drug problem to be held in 2016: (continued) (a) Demand reduction and related measures; (b) Supply reduction and related measures; (c) Countering money-laundering and promoting judicial cooperation to enhance international cooperation. Documents: E/CN.7/2016/2-E/CN.15/2016/2 E/CN.7/2016/4 E/CN.7/2016/5 E/CN.7/2016/6 E/CN.7/2016/7 E/CN.7/2016/8 E/CN.7/2016/11 E/CN.7/2016/13 E/CN.7/2016/14 E/CN.7/2016/CRP.3 JOURNAL : The journal of the Commission on Narcotic Drugs is issued every morning. It contains the agenda for the day and various announcements. Delegations wishing to include an announcement should contact the Secretary of the Commission: Ms. Jo Dedeyne-Amann, extension 27266/4282. V.16-01373 (E) - 2 - Plenary Hall M-Building Item 6 . Implementation of the international drug control treaties: (a) Challenges and future work of the Commission on Narcotic Drugs and the World Health Organization in the review of substances for possible scheduling recommendations; (c) International Narcotics Control Board; (d) International cooperation to ensure the availability of narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances for medical and scientific purposes while preventing their diversion; (e) Other matters arising from the international drug control treaties.
[Show full text]
Considering Marijuana Legalization
Research Report Considering Marijuana Legalization Insights for Vermont and Other Jurisdictions Jonathan P. Caulkins, Beau Kilmer, Mark A. R. Kleiman, Robert J. MacCoun, Gregory Midgette, Pat Oglesby, Rosalie Liccardo Pacula, Peter H. Reuter C O R P O R A T I O N For more information on this publication, visit www.rand.org/t/rr864 Published by the RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, Calif. © Copyright 2015 RAND Corporation R® is a registered trademark. Limited Print and Electronic Distribution Rights This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited. Permission is given to duplicate this document for personal use only, as long as it is unaltered and complete. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial use. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.html. The RAND Corporation is a research organization that develops solutions to public policy challenges to help make communities throughout the world safer and more secure, healthier and more prosperous. RAND is nonprofit, nonpartisan, and committed to the public interest. RAND’s publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors. Support RAND Make a tax-deductible charitable contribution at www.rand.org/giving/contribute www.rand.org Preface Marijuana legalization is a controversial and multifaceted issue that is now the subject of seri- ous debate. In May 2014, Governor Peter Shumlin signed Act 155 (S.
[Show full text]
Police and Crime Commissioners
Police and Crime Commissioners : emerging 'drug policy actors'? AUSTEN, Liz <http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2837-8297> Available from Sheffield Hallam University Research Archive (SHURA) at: http://shura.shu.ac.uk/11365/ This document is the author deposited version. You are advised to consult the publisher's version if you wish to cite from it. Published version AUSTEN, Liz (2016). Police and Crime Commissioners : emerging 'drug policy actors'? Safer Communities, 15 (1), 4-10. Copyright and re-use policy See http://shura.shu.ac.uk/information.html Sheffield Hallam University Research Archive http://shura.shu.ac.uk Police and Crime Commissioners: Emerging 'drug policy actors'? Dr Liz Austen Sheffield Hallam University Safer Communities: Viewpoint Article Pre-publication draft Abstract Purpose In 2013, the Police and Crime Commissioner for Durham, Ron Hogg, initiated a debate around the future of British drug policy. In June 2015, the Derbyshire PCC, Alan Charles, opened a similar debate with representatives from policing, third party support agencies, national advocates and academics to discuss the possibilities for change. This short article presents the views and actions of senior figures in the police service and discusses motivations for pursuing change. The aim of the paper is to introduce Police and Crime Commissioners as 'drug policy actors' (Seddon 2011) and to highlight key areas for further academic enquiry. Design/methodology/approach This article is based on press releases and media accounts of the recent activity of the PCCs in relation to national drug policy. This article provides an academic viewpoint on recent events, supported by theoretical literature critiquing drug policy and contemporary policing.
[Show full text]
How Can the Lens of Human Rights Provide a New Perspective on Drug Control and Point to Different Ways of Regulating Drug Consumption?
How can the lens of human rights provide a new perspective on drug control and point to different ways of regulating drug consumption? A thesis submitted to The University of Manchester for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Faculty of Humanities 2015 Melissa L. Bone School of Law Table of Contents Index of Tables……………………………………………………………………..….5 Table of Cases………………………………………….………………………………6 Table of Statutes, Treaties and Legislative Instruments……………………………....10 List of Abbreviations…………………………………………………………………15 Abstract………………………………………………...…………………………….18 Candidate’s Declaration and Copyright Statement…………………………………...19 Acknowledgements…………………………………...……………………………...20 Introduction………………………………………………………………..…………22 Chapter 1: Understanding the origin and value of human rights and psychoactive consumption………………………………………………………………………….32 1.1 What are human rights and where have they come from?………..……………….33 1.2 Human right foundations and the question of importance…………...……………36 1.3 The grounds for human rights…………………………………………….………42 1.3.1 ‘The universalist challenge’…………………………………………..46 1.4 The origin and value of human psychoactive consumption……………………….49 1.5 Conclusion……………………………………………………………..…………54 Chapter 2: Understanding how human rights can address the drug policy binary: the conflict between the interests of the State and the interests of the individual………….55 2.1 Defining ‘the State’……………………………………………………...………..56 2.2 Identifying four ‘typical philosophical positions and the binary which underpins them……………………………………………………………….………………….62
[Show full text]
Penalties for Marijuana in the Bahamas
Penalties For Marijuana In The Bahamas Is Benito always graphical and justiciary when invited some Luing very officially and inconceivably? Somatogenic Danny fictionalizes some headways and recompense his romneyas so dreamingly! Crook Herrick count-down or post-tensions some chromolithograph feignedly, however unhunted Mose occupy incestuously or scrimshaws. Possession of any mostly for personal use is decriminalized. Most museums in the Bahamas are archaeological and historical. Possession of medical cultivation of any time from marijuana for blocking regulation. Is Marijuana Appropriate for Medicinal Use? Understanding and interdict illicit drugs are popular, have seriously explored doing so, and the marijuana when in a bachelor of the life. Since enactment of new regulations, many data the IBCs have closed shop in The Bahamas. It then statistically integrates hundreds of data points into good overall impairment score. These remedial actions, among other compliance commitments, are included as conditions in the settlement agreement. The confiscated and in penalties for marijuana from using or hell are. Demand for all sports rental industry, logistical support decriminalizing marijuana. Antigua waters along with support leaves, install a dangerous drugs for sacramental purposes due diligence on. The government is pursue a drive to their down on smoking in public places. All approve of the cases were at Jose Marti International Airport in Havana. Many schools have loosened the penalties for using marijuana including Rutgers University While its rules and monitoring for performance-enhancing drugs. Use is in nassau international, there are reserved for an arrest process, customs department bureau is a nationalized industry. Aml enforcement of the appellant to get relatives in imprisonment for marijuana penalties in the bahamas? The country legalize medical cannabis culture and the bahamas for in penalties.
[Show full text]
This Is the Peer Reviewed Version of the Following Article
This is the peer reviewed version of the following article: Potter, G. R., Barratt, M. J., Malm, A., Bouchard, M., Blok, T., Christensen, A.-S., Decorte, T., Frank, V. A., Hakkarainen, P., Klein, A., Lenton, S., Perälä, J., Werse, B., & Wouters, M. (2015). Global patterns of domestic cannabis cultivation: Sample characteristics and patterns of growing across eleven countries. International Journal of Drug Policy, 26(3), 226–237. which has been published in final form at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugpo.2014.12.007 This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance with Elsevier’s Article Sharing policy and Hosting policy © 2014. This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Accepted Manuscript Title: Global patterns of domestic cannabis cultivation: Sample characteristics and patterns of growing across eleven countries Author: Gary R. Potter Monica J. Barratt Aili Malm Martin Bouchard Thomas Blok Anne-Soﬁe Christensen Tom Decorte Vibeke Asmussen Frank Pekka Hakkarainen Axel Klein Simon Lenton Jussi Peral¨ a¨ Bernd Werse Marije Wouters PII: S0955-3959(14)00363-6 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.1016/j.drugpo.2014.12.007 Reference: DRUPOL 1503 To appear in: International Journal of Drug Policy Received date: 22-7-2014 Revised date: 6-12-2014 Accepted date: 8-12-2014 Please cite this article as: Potter, G. R., Barratt, M. J., Malm, A., Bouchard, M., Blok, T., Christensen, A.-S., Decorte, T., Frank, V. A., Hakkarainen, P., Klein, A., Lenton, S., Peral¨ a,¨ J., Werse, B., and Wouters, M.,Global patterns of domestic cannabis cultivation: sample characteristics and patterns of growing across eleven countries, International Journal of Drug Policy (2014), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.drugpo.2014.12.007 This is a PDF ﬁle of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication.
[Show full text]
Dissertation Submitted As Part of the Requirement for the Bsc Biological Science
Faculty of Science & Technology The beliefs and attitudes of key populations in the UK in regards to whether cannabis should be legalised for medicinal purpose. A dissertation submitted as part of the requirement for the BSc Biological Science. C. R. Miles 12th May 2017 Word count: 10,749 Abstract Background Cannabis has been used for its therapeutic properties for five millennia and was prescribed for medicinal use in the UK until 1971. Cannabis then became classified as a Class B, Schedule 1 drug under the Misuse of Drugs Act 1971, which declared it has “no medicinal value”. However, since then a growing body of evidence derived from clinical trials and case reports have supported the plants claimed therapeutic potential. Consequently, many campaign for the legalisation of cannabis for medicinal use in the UK. Given this is a topic of much current debate, this study explores the views and concerns of the key sectors of UK populations, including healthcare professionals, politicians, lawyers, and students, as well as the general British public, in regards to the legalisation of medicinal cannabis in the UK. Method An anonymous online survey was created using SurveyMonkey. Healthcare professional, lawyers and politicians were contacted via email (contact details found on online websites). Students were targeted through social media and a paper survey which was handed out in Bournemouth University lectures. Members of the general public were also targeted through social media and a paper survey which was handed out in Bournemouth Town Centre. There was representative sample of 392 respondents. Results A statistically significant proportion (70%) of the key UK populations (as defined by this study) believe cannabis should be legalised for medicinal use.
[Show full text]
Manifiesto Internacional OMS Cannabis Traducido 1:12
Naciones Unidas E/CN.7/2020/NGO/7 Distr.: General Consejo Ecónomico y Social 25 November 2020 English only Comisión en drogas narcóticas Reanudada la sexagésimo tercera sesión Vienna, 2–4 diciembre 2020 Item 5 de la agenda provisional* Implementación de tratados de control de drogas internacionales Declaración presentada por la coalición europea por la justicia y políticas de drogas eficaces, una organización no gubernamental reconocida como entidad consultiva por el Consejo Social y Económico El Secretario-General ha recibido el siguiente manifiesto, el cual está siendo circulado de acuardo a los párrafos 36 y 37 de la resolución 1996/31 del Consejo Económico y Social __________________ * E/CN.7/2020/1/Add.1. ** Issued without formal editing. V.20-06992 (E) 261120 291120 *2006992* E/CN.7/2020/NGO/7 Manifiesto Apoya el acceso de pacientes a su medicina, ¡vota que sí! La cannabis ha sido una medicina convencional desde el amanecer de la civilización. En 1902 y 1929 las medicinas cannábicas fueron discutidas en la Conferencia Internacional por la Unificación de las Fórmulas Farmacopeicas para Drogas Potentes, la cual proporcionó pautas para armonizar las medicinas de cannabis y proveer a pacientes de drogas seguras y estandarizadas para sus tratamientos. Para este tiempo la cannabis ya era bastante aceptada en la práctica clínica y había sido reportada en las Farmacopeas de Austria, Bélgica, Francia, Hungaria, Italia, Japón, Holanda, Suiza, Reino Unido, Estados Unidos de América, así como en México y España. En 1958, las Naciones Unidas reportaron que la cannabis estaba también en las Farmacopeas de Argentina, Brazil, China, Egypt, Finland, India, Portugal, Romania, la URSS, y Venezuela.(2) Muchas preparacionas cannábicas están en textos ancestrales que componen la Farmacopea Ayurvédica (Charaka Samhita, Sushruta Samhita, Shargandhara Samhita) y en las Farmacopeas Mediterráneas de Umdat at-tabîb, Jami' al-mufradat, Hadîqat al-azhâr or Tuhfat al-ahbâb.
[Show full text]
Marijuana May Impair Male Fertility
Marijuana May Impair Male Fertility Smokers Have Lower Total Sperm Count Men who smoke marijuana frequently have significantly less seminal fluid, a lower total sperm count and their sperm behave abnormally, all of which may affect fertility adversely, a new study in reproductive physiology at the University at Buffalo has shown. This study is the first to assess marijuana's effects on specific swimming behavior of sperm from marijuana smokers and to compare the results with sperm from men with confirmed fertility. Marijuana contains the cannabinoid drug THC (tetrahydrocannabinol), which is its primary psychoactive chemical, as well as other cannabinoids. Marijuana Affects Male Sperm Results of the study were presented at the annual meeting of the American Society of Reproductive Medicine in San Antonio. "The bottom line is, the active ingredients in marijuana are doing something to sperm, and the numbers are in the direction toward infertility," said Lani J. Burkman, Ph.D., lead author on the study. Burkman is assistant professor of gynecology/obstetrics and urology and head of the Section on Andrology in the UB School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences. UB's andrology laboratory also carries out sophisticated diagnosis for infertile couples. Sperm Swimming Too Fast, Too Early "We don't know exactly what is happening to change sperm functioning," said Burkman, "but we think it is one of two things: THC may be causing improper timing of sperm function by direct stimulation, or it may be bypassing natural inhibition mechanisms. Whatever the cause, the sperm are swimming too fast too early." This aberrant pattern has been connected to infertility in other studies, she noted.
[Show full text]
Medical Marijuana the War on Drugs and the Drug Policy Reform Movement
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SANTA CRUZ FROM THE FRONTLINES TO THE BOTTOM LINE: MEDICAL MARIJUANA THE WAR ON DRUGS AND THE DRUG POLICY REFORM MOVEMENT A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction Of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in SOCIOLOGY by Thomas R. Heddleston June 2012 The Dissertation of Thomas R. Heddleston is approved: ____________________________________ Professor Craig Reinarman, Chair ____________________________________ Professor Andrew Szasz ____________________________________ Professor Barbara Epstein ___________________________________ Tyrus Miller Vice Provost and Dean of Graduate Studies Copyright © by Thomas R. Heddleston 2012 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction 1 Chapter I: The History, Discourse, and Practice of Punitive Drug Prohibition 38 Chapter II: Three Branches Of Reform, The Drug Policy Reform Movement From 1964 To 2012 91 Chapter III: Sites of Social Movement Activity 149 Chapter IV: The Birth of Medical Marijuana In California 208 Chapter V: A Tale of 3 Cities Medical Marijuana 1997-2011 245 Chapter VI: From Movement to Industry 303 Conclusion 330 List of Supplementary Materials 339 References 340 iii LIST OF TABLES AND FIGURES Table 2.1: Major Organizations in the Drug Policy Reform Movement by Funding Source and Organizational Form 144 Table 3.1: Characteristics of Hemp Rallies Attended 158 Table 3.2: Drug Policy Organizations and the Internet 197 Figure 4.1: Proposition 215 Vote November 1996 241 Table 5.1: Political Opportunity Structures and Activist Tools 251 Table 5.2: Key Aspects of Political Opportunity Structures at 3 Levels of Government 263 Figure 5.1: Medical Cannabis Dispensaries by Region and State 283 iv ABSTRACT Thomas R. Heddleston From The Frontlines to the Bottom Line: Medical Marijuana the War On Drugs and the Drug Policy Reform Movement The medical marijuana movement began in the San Francisco Bay Area in the early 1990s in a climate of official repression.
[Show full text]