Event European
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
The Following Statement Was Organized by Drcnet Foundation (Also Known As "Stopthedrugwar.Org"), an NGO in Consultative Status with ECOSOC Since 2016
The following statement was organized by DRCNet Foundation (also known as "StoptheDrugWar.org"), an NGO in consultative status with ECOSOC since 2016. It was submitted to the United Nations as a contribution to the 60th Session of the Commission on Narcotic Drugs. This copy provides an updated list of signatories. Please visit http://stopthedrugwar.org/global for updates and other info. (Note that organizations listed with an asterisk were added subsequent to the session and statement distribution.) March 13, 2017 We the undersigned believe the UNGASS Outcome Document stopped short of crucial and widely supported reforms, while avoiding new realities.1 We call on the 60th CND to: Acknowledge the Ramifications of New Drug Policies Clarify that "commitment to… the three international drug control conventions" 2 does not mean these treaties, written between 28 and 56 years ago, should remain unchanged.3 Convene an "Expert Advisory Group" to study tensions in the drug control regime.4 Stand Up for Human Rights Assert that nations' drug policies should be constrained by human rights norms; with special attention on racial disparities, indigenous rights, and impact on women and youth.5 6 7 8 Call for abolishing the death penalty for drug offenses.9 Call for a People-Centered Approach to Drug Policy Explicitly endorse harm reduction and shifting resources to fund it.10 Assert the Sustainable Development Goals should both inform and constrain drug policy.11 Direct WHO to complete a Critical Review of cannabis, including rescheduling options.12 Take a Stronger Stance on Criminal Justice Reform Encourage bold steps away from criminalization.13 Advocate a diverse range of alternatives to incarceration, including Law Enforcement Assisted Diversion, as well as sentencing reform and other compassionate reforms.14 Advocate that regulatory approaches be considered for new psychoactive substances.15 Foster Open Dialogue Structure future UN meetings to enable truly open debate. -
Country Title First Name Last Name Austria Frau Evelyn Regner
Country Title First name Last name Austria Frau Evelyn Regner Bulgaria G-n Angel Dzhambazki Bulgaria G-n Emil Radev Czech Republic Pan Jiří Maštálka Czech Republic Pan Pavel Svoboda Denmark Mr Jens Rohde Finland Rva Heidi Hautala France Mme Joëlle Bergeron France Mme Marie-Christine Boutonnet France M. Jean-Marie Cavada France M. Pascal Durand France Mme Constance Le Grip France M. Gilles Lebreton France Mme Virginie Rozière Germany Frau Evelyne Gebhardt Germany Frau Sylvia-Yvonne Kaufmann Germany Frau Angelika Niebler Germany Frau Julia Reda Germany Herr Axel Voss Germany Herr Rainer Wieland Germany Mr Tiemo Wölken Greece Kirios Konstantinos Chrysogonos Hungary Úr József Szájer Ireland Mr Brian Crowley Italy Ms Isabella Adinolfi Italy Sig. Mario Borghezio Italy Sig. Sergio Cofferati Italy Sig.ra Laura Ferrara Italy Mr Enrico Gasbarra Italy Mr Stefano Maullu Lithuania Mr Antanas Guoga Lithuania Ponas Viktor Uspaskich Luxembourg Mme Mady Delvaux Poland Pani Lidia Joanna Geringer de Oedenberg Poland Mr Kosma Złotowski Poland Pan Stanisław Jozef Żółtek Poland Pan Tadeusz Zwiefka Portugal Sr Antonio Marinho E Pinto Romania Dl Daniel Buda Spain Sr Luis de Grandes Pascual Spain Sra Rosa Estaràs Ferragut Sweden Herr Max Andersson Sweden Fru Jytte Guteland United Kingdom Ms Jane Collins United Kingdom Ms Mary Honeyball United Kingdom Mr Sajjad Karim Email Political group [email protected] S&D [email protected] ECR [email protected] EPP [email protected] GUE/NGL [email protected] -
Journal 4 Revised
UNITED NATIONS J O U R N A L Commission on Narcotic Drugs Fifty-ninth session Vienna, 14-22 March 2016 No. 4 SCHEDULE OF MEETINGS — THURSDAY, 17 MARCH 2016 COMMISSION ON NARCOTIC DRUGS, FIFTY-NINTH SESSION, REGULAR SEGMENT 10 a.m. Plenary, seventh meeting Plenary Hall M-Building Item 5. Implementation of the Political Declaration and Plan of Action on International Cooperation towards an Integrated and Balanced Strategy to Counter the World Drug Problem: follow-up to the high-level review by the Commission on Narcotic Drugs, in view of the special session of the General Assembly on the world drug problem to be held in 2016: (continued) (a) Demand reduction and related measures; (b) Supply reduction and related measures; (c) Countering money-laundering and promoting judicial cooperation to enhance international cooperation. Documents: E/CN.7/2016/2-E/CN.15/2016/2 E/CN.7/2016/4 E/CN.7/2016/5 E/CN.7/2016/6 E/CN.7/2016/7 E/CN.7/2016/8 E/CN.7/2016/11 E/CN.7/2016/13 E/CN.7/2016/14 E/CN.7/2016/CRP.3 JOURNAL : The journal of the Commission on Narcotic Drugs is issued every morning. It contains the agenda for the day and various announcements. Delegations wishing to include an announcement should contact the Secretary of the Commission: Ms. Jo Dedeyne-Amann, extension 27266/4282. V.16-01373 (E) - 2 - Plenary Hall M-Building Item 6 . Implementation of the international drug control treaties: (a) Challenges and future work of the Commission on Narcotic Drugs and the World Health Organization in the review of substances for possible scheduling recommendations; (c) International Narcotics Control Board; (d) International cooperation to ensure the availability of narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances for medical and scientific purposes while preventing their diversion; (e) Other matters arising from the international drug control treaties. -
Annex 1 Current Encod Membership – April 2014
ANNEX 1 CURRENT ENCOD MEMBERSHIP – APRIL 2014 HARM REDUCTION ORGANISATIONS - 6 ASSOCIAZIONE TILT – Italy AILAKET - Spain COLLETIVO INFOSHOCK – Italy Akzept e.V. - Germany DRUG PEACE INSTITUTE - Netherlands ALICE-PROJECT - Germany FHN – Norway Blue Point Drug Counseling and Outpatient Center – Forum Droghe – Italy Hungary INEIDFO - Germany BUNDESVERBAND DER ELTERN – Germany LEGALIZACE.CZ – Czech Republic FEDERACION ANDALUZA DE DROGODEPENDENCIAS LEGALIZE! – Netherlands Y SIDA ENLACE - Spain Liaison Antiprohibitioniste – Belgium Meres pour la Marijuana - France CONSUMER ORGANISATIONS, CANNABIS - 40 Netherlands Drug Policy Foundation - The Netherlands ACMEFUER – Spain Norml France – France AICC CANNABISCAFE – Spain Norml UK - UK AIRAM - Spain SNARROTIN – Iceland ALACANNABIS – Spain TILT ROMA - Italy ASARTE CLUB SOCIAL CANNABIS – Spain VEREIN LEGALIZE – Austria Asbl Sativa - Belgium VOC - Netherlands Asociación Club Calidad de Vida – Spain Asociación Casa María – Spain MEDIA - 9 Asociación Kali Club – Spain Cañamo – Spain ASSOCIAZIONE ASCIA - Italy Cannabis Magazine – Spain Bündnis Hanfparade e.V. - Germany Cannaclopedia - Belgium CANNABIS COLLEGE – Netherlands CANNAWEB.CH - Switzerland CANNABIS SANS FRONTIERES – France CANNAWEED – France Cannabis Social Club Maribor - Slovenia CANNAZINE – United Kingdom Chanvre et Libertés – France GONZOMEDIA - Netherlands CIRC NORD EST - France Radio K Centrale – Italy CLUB SOCIAL DE CANNABIS DE GRAZALEMA – Spain The Stoned Society - Netherlands CSC MA WEED PERSO - Belgium Deutscher Hanf Verband – Germany -
Last Updated 07.04.2011 LIST of PARTICIPANTS WORLD FORUM
Last updated 07.04.2011 LIST OF PARTICIPANTS WORLD FORUM ON INTERCULTURAL DIALOGUE BAKU, AZERBAIJAN 7-9 APRIL, 2011 Name, Surname Country, Organization Contacts 1. Mr. Hans D’ORVILLE UNESCO, Assistant of Director General for Strategic Planning 2. Mrs. Katerina STENOU UNESCO, Director of the [email protected] Division for culture and intercultural dialogue 3. Ms. Liubava MOREVA UNESCO Moscow Office, [email protected] Programme Specialist for Culture 4. Dr. Abdulaziz Othman İSESCO, Director General [email protected] ALTWAIJRI 5. Mr. Mohamed RIFFI İSESCO, Officer in [email protected], Charge of Protocol and [email protected] Public Relations Division 6. Mr. Halit EREN IRCICA, Director General [email protected], [email protected] 7. Mr. Dussen KASSEINOV TURKSOY, Secretary [email protected] General m 8. Mr. Eflatun NEIMTEZADE TURKSOY, Professor of Gazi University 9. Mr.Askar TURGANBAYEV TURKSOY, Representative of Kazakhstan in TURKSOY 10. Mr. Evgeny NOVOZHILOV Commonwealth of [email protected] Independent States, Deputy Chairman of Executive Committee 11. Mr. Mevlüt ÇAVUŞOĞLU Council of Europe, [email protected] President Parliamentary Assembly 12. Mr. Erdogan DENIZ Council of Europe, Assistant to Mevlüt Çavuşoğlu 13. Mr. Artemy KARPENKO Council of Europe, Assistant to Mevlüt Çavuşoğlu 14. Mr. Robert PALMER Council of Europe, [email protected] Director of Culture, Cultural and Natural Heritage 15. Ms. Janis SYMONS Council of Europe, [email protected] Assistant of Robert Palmer 16. Mrs. Irena GUIDIKOVA Council of Europe, [email protected] Coordinator for Intercultural cities programme 17. Mr. Guiseppe ZAFFUTO Council of Europe, [email protected] Director of Communication, Media Officers/Spokepersons’ Service 18. -
Relations Between the European Council and the European Parliament
Relations between the European Council and the European Parliament Institutional and political dynamics STUDY EPRS | European Parliamentary Research Service Author: Desmond Dinan European Council Oversight Unit PE 630.288 – November 2018 EN Relations between the European Council and the European Parliament Institutional and political dynamics This study explores the development of relations between the European Council (of Heads of State or Government) and the European Parliament, two institutions that have become increasingly central to the operation of the European Union political system, especially since the 2009 Lisbon Treaty. It explains the Treaty framework for relations between the two institutions and traces their practical evolution over time, including an analysis of the roles of the presidents of each institution in such interaction. It also examines points of contention in the relationship to date, including in relation to 'legislative trespassing' by the European Council and the Spitzenkandidaten process. EPRS | European Parliamentary Research Service AUTHOR This study has been written by Desmond Dinan, Ad Personam Jean Monnet Chair and Professor of Public Policy at George Mason University, Virginia, United States, at the request of the European Council Oversight Unit of the Directorate for Impact Assessment and European Added Value of the European Parliamentary Research Service (EPRS). Professor Dinan completed this work during his half-year as a Visiting Fellow at EPRS. ADMINISTRATOR RESPONSIBLE Astrid Worum, European Council Oversight Unit, EPRS To contact the publisher, please e-mail [email protected] LINGUISTIC VERSIONS Original: EN Manuscript completed in September 2018. DISCLAIMER AND COPYRIGHT This document is prepared for, and addressed to, the Members and staff of the European Parliament as background material to assist them in their parliamentary work. -
Special Report
SPECIAL REPORT Key points for the 8th term of the European Parliament (2014-2019) Madrid, November 2014 BARCELONA BOGOTÁ BUENOS AIRES LIMA LISBOA MADRID MÉXICO PANAMÁ QUITO RIO J SÃO PAULO SANTIAGO STO DOMINGO KEY POINTS FOR THE 8TH TERM OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT (2014-2019) 1. THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT 1. THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT 2. THE LATEST ELECTION The European Parliament has, since its creation in 1962 in the 3. MAIN ISSUES IN THE context of the evolution of European integration, become the LEGISLATIVE AGENDA European Union (EU) Institution to have gained more power and 4. SPANISH DELEGATION relevance in the decision-making process of the Union. Indeed, over the years, it has gained increasingly important powers, legitimized 5. CONCLUSIONS and differentiated by the fact that it is the only EU Institution to be 6. APPENDIX 1: COMPETENCES elected by universal suffrage. 7. APPENDIX 2: CURRENT COMPOSITION OF THE It has evolved from being a mere advisory body to having the COMMITTEES power to co-legislate, together with the Council, in more than 85 legislative areas, exercising legislative powers as well as powers 8. APPENDIX 3: THE CURRENT of budgetary and political control. It also wields a considerable BUREAU OF THE EUROPEAN amount of political influence, and its competences include those PARLIAMENT of electing the President of the European Commission, vetoing the 9. APPENDIX 4: EUROPEAN appointment of the College, and even forcing the resignation of the PARLIAMENT DELEGATIONS entire Commission after a motion of no confidence. AUTHORS The official headquarters of the Parliament are in Strasbourg, where the main plenary sessions are held. -
Europa Stärken Heißt Deutschland Stärken! Deutschland Heißt Stärken Europa
Europa stärken heißt Deutschland stärken! Deutschland heißt stärken Europa 1 2 Europa stärken heißt Deutschland stärken Die europäische Politik steht heute mehr denn je im Zentrum des öffentlichen Interesses in Deutschland. Die großen Herausforderungen unserer Zeit – die kriegeri- schen Konflikte in unseren Nachbarregionen, die Migra- tionsbewegungen und der Kampf gegen Islamismus und Terrorismus – lassen sich nicht mehr national lösen. Nur gemeinsam mit unseren europäischen Partnern können wir tragfähige Lösungen erarbeiten und die Errungenschaften der europäischen Einigung – Frieden, Freiheit, Sicherheit und wirtschaftlicher Wohlstand – erhalten. Das Auftreten populistischer, europafeindlicher Parteien und der von Großbritannien angestrebte Austritt aus der EU dürfen nicht darüber hinwegtäuschen, dass die überwältigende Mehrheit der Deutschen wie der Euro- päer von der Notwendigkeit der europäischen Einigung überzeugt ist. Dieses Vertrauen gilt es durch sachge- rechte politische Lösungen auf allen Ebenen zu stärken. Wir arbeiten daher nachhaltig für sichere EU-Außen- grenzen, eine dauerhafte Reduktion der Migrations- ströme nach Europa, eine stabile europäische Währung, solide Staatshaushalte, einen funktionierenden Binnen- markt, Wirtschaftswachstum und Arbeitsplätze, innere und äußere Sicherheit sowie die Bewahrung der Schöp- fung. All dies können wir nur gemeinsam mit unseren europäischen Partnern erreichen und dauerhaft sichern, im Interesse Deutschlands und Europas! Diese Broschüre bietet Ihnen einen Überblick über die Arbeit und -
En En Amendments 1
European Parliament 2019-2024 Committee on Constitutional Affairs 2021/2018(INI) 2.9.2021 AMENDMENTS 1 - 156 Draft report Charles Goerens, Rainer Wieland (PE692.733v01-00) European political parties – report 2021 (2021/2018(INI)) AM\1234908EN.docx PE695.035v01-00 EN United in diversityEN AM_Com_NonLegReport PE695.035v01-00 2/69 AM\1234908EN.docx EN Amendment 1 Domènec Ruiz Devesa Motion for a resolution Citation 1 Motion for a resolution Amendment — having regard to Article 10(4) of — having regard to Articles 2 and the Treaty on European Union, 10(4) of the Treaty on European Union, Or. en Amendment 2 Gabriele Bischoff, Giuliano Pisapia, Domènec Ruiz Devesa Motion for a resolution Citation 2 Motion for a resolution Amendment — having regard to Article 224 of the — having regard to Article 224 and Treaty on the Functioning of the European Article 325 of the Treaty on the Union, Functioning of the European Union, Or. en Amendment 3 Helmut Scholz Motion for a resolution Citation 2 Motion for a resolution Amendment — having regard to Article 224 of the — having regard to Article 224 and Treaty on the Functioning of the European Article 325 of the Treaty on the Union, Functioning of the European Union, Or. en Amendment 4 Rainer Wieland AM\1234908EN.docx 3/69 PE695.035v01-00 EN Motion for a resolution Recital A Motion for a resolution Amendment A. whereas European political parties deleted help to raise European political awareness and express the will of Union citizens; whereas strong political parties and foundations at European level are essential for the development of a truly European political sphere; Or. -
Penalties for Marijuana in the Bahamas
Penalties For Marijuana In The Bahamas Is Benito always graphical and justiciary when invited some Luing very officially and inconceivably? Somatogenic Danny fictionalizes some headways and recompense his romneyas so dreamingly! Crook Herrick count-down or post-tensions some chromolithograph feignedly, however unhunted Mose occupy incestuously or scrimshaws. Possession of any mostly for personal use is decriminalized. Most museums in the Bahamas are archaeological and historical. Possession of medical cultivation of any time from marijuana for blocking regulation. Is Marijuana Appropriate for Medicinal Use? Understanding and interdict illicit drugs are popular, have seriously explored doing so, and the marijuana when in a bachelor of the life. Since enactment of new regulations, many data the IBCs have closed shop in The Bahamas. It then statistically integrates hundreds of data points into good overall impairment score. These remedial actions, among other compliance commitments, are included as conditions in the settlement agreement. The confiscated and in penalties for marijuana from using or hell are. Demand for all sports rental industry, logistical support decriminalizing marijuana. Antigua waters along with support leaves, install a dangerous drugs for sacramental purposes due diligence on. The government is pursue a drive to their down on smoking in public places. All approve of the cases were at Jose Marti International Airport in Havana. Many schools have loosened the penalties for using marijuana including Rutgers University While its rules and monitoring for performance-enhancing drugs. Use is in nassau international, there are reserved for an arrest process, customs department bureau is a nationalized industry. Aml enforcement of the appellant to get relatives in imprisonment for marijuana penalties in the bahamas? The country legalize medical cannabis culture and the bahamas for in penalties. -
Program of the First Phase of Special Funds 2021 – SOE III.1
Program of the first phase of special funds 2021 – SOE III.1. Ph.I from June 28th to July 2nd 2021, online Monday – June 28th, 2021 9:30-9:45 Welcoming 9:45– 10:30 h Presentation of the participations, Discussion on the purposes of the seminar presented by the hosts (everybody) 10:30 – 11:00 h Break 11:00 h-12:30h Teamwork on the presentation of the countries, each host is responsible for the group of its country, the members of each group should choose a spokesperson (everybody) 12:30 h End Tuesday – June 29th, 2021 9:30 –9:50h Linguistic animation (Norsadette&Najet) 9:50-10:30 h Online tour and exploration of the city of Stuttgart through Actionbound, Stuttgart in Europe (Ina&Emeline) 10:30 - 11:00 h Break 11:00 - 12:00 h Online discussion with Linda Zimmermann, spokesperson of Funk on the role of media in a democracy (Ina & Emeline) 12:00 – 12:30 h Feedback on the day (Alban) Wednesday – June 30th, 2021 9:30 – 9:50h Linguistic animation (Norsadette & Najet) 9:50-10:45 h Presentation of the profiles and histories of the following countries : Germany, France, Kosovo (each spokesperson of the three groups) – 20min for each country 10:45 – 11:00 h Break 11:00 - 12:00 h Online Discussion with the European Parliament (Ina) 12:00 h End Thursday – July 1st, 2021 9:30 – 10:30 h Online and interactive tour of the Land Baden- Württemberg’s Parliament (Ina) 10:30-11:00h Break 11:00-11:30h Discussion with Sarah Schweizer, CDU-deputy in Landtag on the structure of federalism (Emeline) 11:30 h-12:00h Feedback (Norsadette) 12:00 h End Friday- July 2nd, 2021 9:30-10:45h Teamwork on the seminar’s objective: what kind of Europe do I want? (Alban &Emeline) 10:45 -11:00 h Break 11:00-12:00 h Discussion with Rainer Wieland, vice-president of the European Parliament, on his work at the European Parliament and the proposals defined before with the teamwork (Ina&Emeline) 12:00-12:30h Feedback on the week and definition of the participants’ wishes for the next two sessions (everybody) 12:30 h End Hosts: Alban Bajrami, Kosovo Norsadette Khaldi, APPC France Ina Rubbert, EZBW Germany. -
Chronicle of an Election Foretold: the Longer-Term Trends Leading to the ‘Spitzenkandidaten’ Procedure and the Election of Jean-Claude Juncker As European
LSE ‘Europe in Question’ Discussion Paper Series Chronicle of an Election Foretold: The Longer-Term Trends leading to the ‘Spitzenkandidaten’ procedure and the Election of Jean-Claude Juncker as European Commission President Martin Westlake LEQS Paper No. 102/2016 January 2016 LEQS is generously supported by the LSE Annual Fund Editorial Board Dr Joan Costa-i-Font Dr Vassilis Monastiriotis Dr Jonathan White Dr Katjana Gattermann Dr Sonja Avlijas All views expressed in this paper are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily represent the views of the editors or the LSE. © Martin Westlake Chronicle of an Election Foretold: The Longer-Term Trends leading to the ‘Spitzenkandidaten’ procedure and the Election of Jean-Claude Juncker as European Commission President Martin Westlake* Abstract By focusing on the near-term campaign in the 2014 European elections analysts have tended to over-look a series of longer-term trends that were jointly and inexorably leading to the Spitzenkandidaten (lead candidate) process and to some at least of the subsequent structural reforms to the Commission. The paper argues that those longer-term trends continue and that the (s)election of Jean-Claude Juncker as President of the European Commission and the structural reforms he subsequently introduced are better understood as steps in ongoing processes rather than fresh departures. Thus, what will happen in 2019 will have been conditioned not only by 2014, but also by previous elections and previous developments, as considered in this paper. Keywords: European Commission Presidency, Jean-Claude Juncker, Spitzenkandidaten, European Parliament, Longer-Term Trends * Visiting Professor, College of Europe, Bruges Senior Visiting Fellow, European Institute, London School of Economics and Political Science Houghton Street, London WC2A 2AE Email: [email protected] The Longer-Term Trends leading to the ‘Spitzenkandidaten’ procedure Table of Contents 1.