Mold Toxins & Related Illness
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
The Food Poisoning Toxins of Bacillus Cereus
toxins Review The Food Poisoning Toxins of Bacillus cereus Richard Dietrich 1,†, Nadja Jessberger 1,*,†, Monika Ehling-Schulz 2 , Erwin Märtlbauer 1 and Per Einar Granum 3 1 Department of Veterinary Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich, Schönleutnerstr. 8, 85764 Oberschleißheim, Germany; [email protected] (R.D.); [email protected] (E.M.) 2 Department of Pathobiology, Functional Microbiology, Institute of Microbiology, University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna, 1210 Vienna, Austria; [email protected] 3 Department of Food Safety and Infection Biology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, P.O. Box 5003 NMBU, 1432 Ås, Norway; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] † These authors have contributed equally to this work. Abstract: Bacillus cereus is a ubiquitous soil bacterium responsible for two types of food-associated gastrointestinal diseases. While the emetic type, a food intoxication, manifests in nausea and vomiting, food infections with enteropathogenic strains cause diarrhea and abdominal pain. Causative toxins are the cyclic dodecadepsipeptide cereulide, and the proteinaceous enterotoxins hemolysin BL (Hbl), nonhemolytic enterotoxin (Nhe) and cytotoxin K (CytK), respectively. This review covers the current knowledge on distribution and genetic organization of the toxin genes, as well as mechanisms of enterotoxin gene regulation and toxin secretion. In this context, the exceptionally high variability of toxin production between single strains is highlighted. In addition, the mode of action of the pore-forming enterotoxins and their effect on target cells is described in detail. The main focus of this review are the two tripartite enterotoxin complexes Hbl and Nhe, but the latest findings on cereulide and CytK are also presented, as well as methods for toxin detection, and the contribution of further putative virulence factors to the diarrheal disease. -
Mycotoxins: a Review of Dairy Concerns
Mycotoxins: A Review of Dairy Concerns L. W. Whitlow, Department of Animal Science and W. M. Hagler, Jr., Department of Poultry Science North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695 Introduction mycotoxins such as the ergots are known to affect cattle and may be prevalent at times in certain feedstuffs. Molds are filamentous (fuzzy or dusty looking) fungi that occur in many feedstuffs including roughages and There are hundreds of different mycotoxins, which are concentrates. Molds can infect dairy cattle, especially diverse in their chemistry and effects on animals. It is during stressful periods when they are immune likely that contaminated feeds will contain more than one suppressed, causing a disease referred to as mycosis. mycotoxin. This paper is directed toward those Molds also produce poisons called mycotoxins that affect mycotoxins thought to occur most frequently at animals when they consume mycotoxin contaminated concentrations toxic to dairy cattle. A more extensive feeds. This disorder is called mycotoxicosis. Mycotoxins review is available in the popular press (Whitlow and are produced by a wide range of different molds and are Hagler, 2004). classified as secondary metabolites, meaning that their function is not essential to the mold’s existence. The Major toxigenic fungi and mycotoxins thought to be U.N.’s Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) has the most prevalent and potentially toxic to dairy cattle. estimated that worldwide, about 25% of crops are affected annually with mycotoxins (Jelinek, 1987). Such surveys Fungal genera Mycotoxins reveal sufficiently high occurrences and concentrations of Aspergillus Aflatoxin, Ochratoxin, mycotoxins to suggest that mycotoxins are a constant Sterigmatocystin, Fumitremorgens, concern. -
New Markers in the Mycotox Profile
New Markers in the MycoTOX Profile We are happy to announce the addition of four new mycotoxin markers to our MycoTOX Profile. The test now includes 11 mycotoxins from 40 species of mold, making it by far the most comprehensive and competitively priced mycotoxin test available. It also still more sensitive and accurate than other tests available, because we use LC/MS/MS technology. Here is an overview of the four new mycotoxin markers: Gliotoxin Gliotoxin (GTX) is produced by the mold genus Aspergillus. Aspergillus spreads in the environment by releasing conidia which are capable of infiltrating the small alveolar airways of individuals. In order to evade the body’s defenses Aspergillus releases Gliotoxin to inhibit the immune system. One of the targets of Gliotoxin is PtdIns (3,4,5) P3. This results in the downregulation of phagocytic immune defense, which can lead to the exacerbation of polymicrobial infections. Gliotoxin impairs the activation of T-cells and induces apoptosis in monocytes and in monocyte-derived dendritic cells. These impairments can lead to multiple neurological syndromes. Mycophenolic Acid Mycophenolic Acid (MPA) produced by the Penicillium fungus. MPA is an immunosuppressant which inhibits the proliferation of B and T lymphocytes. MPA exposure can increase the risk of opportunistic infections such as Clostridia and Candida. MPA is associated with miscarriage and congenital malformations when the woman is exposed in pregnancy. Dihydrocitrinone Dihydrocitrinone is a metabolite of Citrinin (CTN), which is a mycotoxin that is produced by the mold species Aspergillus, Penicillium, and Monascus. CTN exposure can lead to nephropathy, because of its ability to increase permeability of mitochondrial membranes in the kidneys. -
Fungal Keratitis: Immune Recognition, Neutrophil-Hyphae Interactions, And
FUNGAL KERATITIS: IMMUNE RECOGNITION, NEUTROPHIL-HYPHAE INTERACTIONS, AND FUNGAL ANTI-OXIDATIVE DEFENSES by SIXTO MANUEL LEAL JR. Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Thesis Advisor: Eric Pearlman, Ph.D. Department of Pathology CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY August, 2012 CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF GRADUATE STUDIES We hereby approve the dissertation of ______________________________________________________ candidate for the Ph.D. degree *. (signed)_______________________________________________ (chair of the committee) ________________________________________________ ________________________________________________ ________________________________________________ ________________________________________________ ________________________________________________ (date) _______________________ *We also certify that written approval has been obtained for any proprietary material contained therein. Dedication I dedicate this cumulative work to the invisible hand that has blessed my personal and academic life with incredible people, guidance, talent, courage, perseverance, and productivity. 3 Table of Contents List of Figures 7 List of Tables 9 Acknowledgements 10 List of Abbreviations 12 Abstract 14 Chapter 1. Introduction Fungi in their natural environment 16 Fungi and human disease 18 Fungi that cause human corneal infection 21 Fungal keratitis- Clinical characteristics and outcome 22 Anti-microbial Defenses at the Ocular Surface 23 Immune Recognition of Fungi 27 β2 integrins -
Biological Toxins As the Potential Tools for Bioterrorism
International Journal of Molecular Sciences Review Biological Toxins as the Potential Tools for Bioterrorism Edyta Janik 1, Michal Ceremuga 2, Joanna Saluk-Bijak 1 and Michal Bijak 1,* 1 Department of General Biochemistry, Faculty of Biology and Environmental Protection, University of Lodz, Pomorska 141/143, 90-236 Lodz, Poland; [email protected] (E.J.); [email protected] (J.S.-B.) 2 CBRN Reconnaissance and Decontamination Department, Military Institute of Chemistry and Radiometry, Antoniego Chrusciela “Montera” 105, 00-910 Warsaw, Poland; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] or [email protected]; Tel.: +48-(0)426354336 Received: 3 February 2019; Accepted: 3 March 2019; Published: 8 March 2019 Abstract: Biological toxins are a heterogeneous group produced by living organisms. One dictionary defines them as “Chemicals produced by living organisms that have toxic properties for another organism”. Toxins are very attractive to terrorists for use in acts of bioterrorism. The first reason is that many biological toxins can be obtained very easily. Simple bacterial culturing systems and extraction equipment dedicated to plant toxins are cheap and easily available, and can even be constructed at home. Many toxins affect the nervous systems of mammals by interfering with the transmission of nerve impulses, which gives them their high potential in bioterrorist attacks. Others are responsible for blockage of main cellular metabolism, causing cellular death. Moreover, most toxins act very quickly and are lethal in low doses (LD50 < 25 mg/kg), which are very often lower than chemical warfare agents. For these reasons we decided to prepare this review paper which main aim is to present the high potential of biological toxins as factors of bioterrorism describing the general characteristics, mechanisms of action and treatment of most potent biological toxins. -
Evaluation of the Individual and Combined Toxicity of Fumonisin Mycotoxins in Human Gastric Epithelial Cells
International Journal of Molecular Sciences Article Evaluation of the Individual and Combined Toxicity of Fumonisin Mycotoxins in Human Gastric Epithelial Cells Song Yu, Bingxuan Jia, Na Liu, Dianzhen Yu and Aibo Wu * SIBS-UGENT-SJTU Joint Laboratory of Mycotoxin Research, CAS Key Laboratory of Nutrition, Metabolism and Food Safety, Shanghai Institute of Nutrition and Health, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai 200031, China; [email protected] (S.Y.); [email protected] (B.J.); [email protected] (N.L.); [email protected] (D.Y.) * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +86-21-54920716 Received: 23 July 2020; Accepted: 14 August 2020; Published: 18 August 2020 Abstract: Fumonisin contaminates food and feed extensively throughout the world, causing chronic and acute toxicity in human and animals. Currently, studies on the toxicology of fumonisins mainly focus on fumonisin B1 (FB1). Considering that FB1, fumonisin B2 (FB2) and fumonisin B3 (FB3) could coexist in food and feed, a study regarding a single toxin, FB1, may not completely reflect the toxicity of fumonisin. The gastrointestinal tract is usually exposed to these dietary toxins. In our study, the human gastric epithelial cell line (GES-1) was used as in vitro model to evaluate the toxicity of fumonisin. Firstly, we found that they could cause a decrease in cell viability, and increase in membrane leakage, cell death and the induction of expression of markers for endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress. Their toxicity potency rank is FB1 > FB2 >> FB3. The results also showed that the synergistic effect appeared in the combinations of FB1 + FB2 and FB1 + FB3. -
FINAL RISK ASSESSMENT for Aspergillus Niger (February 1997)
ATTACHMENT I--FINAL RISK ASSESSMENT FOR Aspergillus niger (February 1997) I. INTRODUCTION Aspergillus niger is a member of the genus Aspergillus which includes a set of fungi that are generally considered asexual, although perfect forms (forms that reproduce sexually) have been found. Aspergilli are ubiquitous in nature. They are geographically widely distributed, and have been observed in a broad range of habitats because they can colonize a wide variety of substrates. A. niger is commonly found as a saprophyte growing on dead leaves, stored grain, compost piles, and other decaying vegetation. The spores are widespread, and are often associated with organic materials and soil. History of Commercial Use and Products Subject to TSCA Jurisdiction The primary uses of A. niger are for the production of enzymes and organic acids by fermentation. While the foods, for which some of the enzymes may be used in preparation, are not subject to TSCA, these enzymes may have multiple uses, many of which are not regulated except under TSCA. Fermentations to produce these enzymes may be carried out in vessels as large as 100,000 liters (Finkelstein et al., 1989). A. niger is also used to produce organic acids such as citric acid and gluconic acid. The history of safe use for A. niger comes primarily from its use in the food industry for the production of many enzymes such as a-amylase, amyloglucosidase, cellulases, lactase, invertase, pectinases, and acid proteases (Bennett, 1985a; Ward, 1989). In addition, the annual production of citric acid by fermentation is now approximately 350,000 tons, using either A. -
PESTICIDE EVALUATION REPORT and SAFER USE ACTION PLAN(PERSUAP)
PESTICIDE EVALUATION REPORT and SAFER USE ACTION PLAN(PERSUAP) By the USAID Kenya Agricultural Value Chain Enterprises (USAID-KAVES) Project Revised March 2014 This publication was produced for review by the United States Agency for International Development. It was prepared by Fintrac Inc. under contract reference AID-623-C-13-00002 Fintrac Inc. www.fintrac.com [email protected] US Virgin Islands 3077 Kronprindsens Gade 72 St. Thomas, USVI 00802 Tel: (340) 776-7600 Fax: (340) 776-7601 Washington, D.C. 1400 16th Street NW, Suite 400 Washington, D.C. 20036 USA Tel: (202) 462-3304 Fax: (202) 462-8478 USAID-KAVES Karen Office Park 3rd Floor Baobab, Suite H Langata Road, Karen, Nairobi Prepared by Fintrac Inc. USAID-KAVES PERSUAP 3 KENYA AGRICULTURAL VALUE CHAIN ENTERPRISES PROJECT (KAVES) PESTICIDE EVALUATION REPORT and SAFER USE ACTION PLAN (PERSUAP) Revised March 20134 The author’s views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect the views of the United States Agency for International Development or the United States government. Photos by Fintrac Inc. and Real IPM. Prepared by Fintrac Inc. INITIAL ENVIRONMENTAL EXAMINATION, AMENDMENTPESTICIDE EVALUATION REPORT AND SAFER USE ACTION PLAN (PERSUAP) FOR USAID/KENYA’S KENYA AGRICULTURAL VALUE CHAIN ENTERPRISES (KAVES) PROJECT CONTRACT NO. AID-623-C-13-00002 PROJECT NAME: Kenya Agricultural Value Chain Enterprises (KAVES) Project REGION/COUNTRY: East Africa/Kenya PROGRAM AREA: 4.5 Agriculture, Feed the Future ORIGINATING OFFICE Agriculture Business and Environment Office CURRENT DATE (as of revisions): March 2014 IEE AMENDMENT: Yes PREPARED BY: Fintrac Inc. IMPLEMENTATION START: January 16, 2013 LOP AMOUNT: $39,810,558 IMPLEMENTATION END: January 15th 2018 Filename & date of original IEE: Kenya_FY09_EconGrowth_IEE_01xx09.doc The purpose of this IEE amendment is to approve the 2013 Pesticide Evaluation Report (PER) and Safer Use Action Plan (SUAP) developed under the KAVES project and which will be used during project implementation. -
Medical Management of Biological Casualties Handbook
USAMRIID’s MEDICAL MANAGEMENT OF BIOLOGICAL CASUALTIES HANDBOOK Sixth Edition April 2005 U.S. ARMY MEDICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES FORT DETRICK FREDERICK, MARYLAND Emergency Response Numbers National Response Center: 1-800-424-8802 or (for chem/bio hazards & terrorist events) 1-202-267-2675 National Domestic Preparedness Office: 1-202-324-9025 (for civilian use) Domestic Preparedness Chem/Bio Helpline: 1-410-436-4484 or (Edgewood Ops Center – for military use) DSN 584-4484 USAMRIID’s Emergency Response Line: 1-888-872-7443 CDC'S Emergency Response Line: 1-770-488-7100 Handbook Download Site An Adobe Acrobat Reader (pdf file) version of this handbook can be downloaded from the internet at the following url: http://www.usamriid.army.mil USAMRIID’s MEDICAL MANAGEMENT OF BIOLOGICAL CASUALTIES HANDBOOK Sixth Edition April 2005 Lead Editor Lt Col Jon B. Woods, MC, USAF Contributing Editors CAPT Robert G. Darling, MC, USN LTC Zygmunt F. Dembek, MS, USAR Lt Col Bridget K. Carr, MSC, USAF COL Ted J. Cieslak, MC, USA LCDR James V. Lawler, MC, USN MAJ Anthony C. Littrell, MC, USA LTC Mark G. Kortepeter, MC, USA LTC Nelson W. Rebert, MS, USA LTC Scott A. Stanek, MC, USA COL James W. Martin, MC, USA Comments and suggestions are appreciated and should be addressed to: Operational Medicine Department Attn: MCMR-UIM-O U.S. Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases (USAMRIID) Fort Detrick, Maryland 21702-5011 PREFACE TO THE SIXTH EDITION The Medical Management of Biological Casualties Handbook, which has become affectionately known as the "Blue Book," has been enormously successful - far beyond our expectations. -
MOLD and MILDEW – an OVERVIEW/MARINE UPHOLSTERY Mold and Mildew Problems in the Marine Or Exterior Likely Element to Control Is Moisture
performance products PERFORMANCE PRODUCTS DIVISION MOLD AND MILDEW – AN OVERVIEW/MARINE UPHOLSTERY Mold and mildew problems in the marine or exterior likely element to control is moisture. Keep a surface upholstery, wallcovering, paint, tarpaulin, swimming dry and the ambient air dry, and you can break the pool and shower curtain markets, to name a few, link in the Mildew Square. In actuality, this is very have been well documented over the last 25 years. difficult. Marine upholstery may be dry when one sits The objective of this overview is to review the causes on it, but it is constantly exposed to rain, splashes and and cures of these unsightly and odoriferous wet bathing suits. problems and suggest actions to reduce their impact on the quality of goods as perceived by the Spores consumers. Food THE CAUSE – MICROORGANISMS The two principal causes of offensive odors and Water unsightly stains and growths are bacteria and fungi, Warmth commonly called microorganisms. Bacteria are simple, single-celled organisms. Fungi, referred to as mold and mildew, are significantly more complex. A A COMPLEX PROBLEM – AN EXAMPLE subset of fungal organisms is a type that produces One can observe an unsightly stain, dirt, or mildew colored byproducts as part of its digestive process. growth on the surface of a marine seat and ask the These byproducts are recognized as stains and are question, “How did it get there?” Dirt carried by the typically pink, yellow, purple or black. All wind or sudden shower will carry the spores or seeds, microorganisms require a source of energy; carbon inoculating the surface. -
Allergic Bronchopulmonary Aspergillosis and Severe Asthma with Fungal Sensitisation
Allergic Bronchopulmonary Aspergillosis and Severe Asthma with Fungal Sensitisation Dr Rohit Bazaz National Aspergillosis Centre, UK Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust/University of Manchester ~ ABPA -a41'1 Severe asthma wl'th funga I Siens itisat i on Subacute IA Chronic pulmonary aspergillosjs Simp 1Ie a:spe rgmoma As r§i · bronchitis I ram une dysfu net Ion Lun· damage Immu11e hypce ractivitv Figure 1 In t@rarctfo n of Aspergillus Vliith host. ABP A, aHerg tc broncho pu~ mo na my as µe rgi ~fos lis; IA, i nvas we as ?@rgiH os 5. MANCHl·.'>I ER J:-\2 I Kosmidis, Denning . Thorax 2015;70:270–277. doi:10.1136/thoraxjnl-2014-206291 Allergic Fungal Airway Disease Phenotypes I[ Asthma AAFS SAFS ABPA-S AAFS-asthma associated with fu ngaIsensitization SAFS-severe asthma with funga l sensitization ABPA-S-seropositive a llergic bronchopulmonary aspergi ll osis AB PA-CB-all ergic bronchopulmonary aspergi ll osis with central bronchiectasis Agarwal R, CurrAlfergy Asthma Rep 2011;11:403 Woolnough K et a l, Curr Opin Pulm Med 2015;21:39 9 Stanford Lucile Packard ~ Children's. Health Children's. Hospital CJ Scanford l MEDICINE Stanford MANCHl·.'>I ER J:-\2 I Aspergi 11 us Sensitisation • Skin testing/specific lgE • Surface hydroph,obins - RodA • 30% of patients with asthma • 13% p.atients with COPD • 65% patients with CF MANCHl·.'>I ER J:-\2 I Alternar1a• ABPA •· .ABPA is an exagg·erated response ofthe imm1une system1 to AspergUlus • Com1pUcatio n of asthm1a and cystic f ibrosis (rarell·y TH2 driven COPD o r no identif ied p1 rior resp1 iratory d isease) • ABPA as a comp1 Ucation of asth ma affects around 2.5% of adullts. -
AVMA Guidelines for the Depopulation of Animals: 2019 Edition
AVMA Guidelines for the Depopulation of Animals: 2019 Edition Members of the Panel on Animal Depopulation Steven Leary, DVM, DACLAM (Chair); Fidelis Pharmaceuticals, High Ridge, Missouri Raymond Anthony, PhD (Ethicist); University of Alaska Anchorage, Anchorage, Alaska Sharon Gwaltney-Brant, DVM, PhD, DABVT, DABT (Lead, Companion Animals Working Group); Veterinary Information Network, Mahomet, Illinois Samuel Cartner, DVM, PhD, DACLAM (Lead, Laboratory Animals Working Group); University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama Renee Dewell, DVM, MS (Lead, Bovine Working Group); Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa Patrick Webb, DVM (Lead, Swine Working Group); National Pork Board, Des Moines, Iowa Paul J. Plummer, DVM, DACVIM-LA (Lead, Small Ruminant Working Group); Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa Donald E. Hoenig, VMD (Lead, Poultry Working Group); American Humane Association, Belfast, Maine William Moyer, DVM, DACVSMR (Lead, Equine Working Group); Texas A&M University College of Veterinary Medicine, Billings, Montana Stephen A. Smith, DVM, PhD (Lead, Aquatics Working Group); Virginia-Maryland College of Veterinary Medicine, Blacksburg, Virginia Andrea Goodnight, DVM (Lead, Zoo and Wildlife Working Group); The Living Desert Zoo and Gardens, Palm Desert, California P. Gary Egrie, VMD (nonvoting observing member); USDA APHIS Veterinary Services, Riverdale, Maryland Axel Wolff, DVM, MS (nonvoting observing member); Office of Laboratory Animal Welfare (OLAW), Bethesda, Maryland AVMA Staff Consultants Cia L. Johnson, DVM, MS, MSc; Director, Animal Welfare Division Emily Patterson-Kane, PhD; Animal Welfare Scientist, Animal Welfare Division The following individuals contributed substantively through their participation in the Panel’s Working Groups, and their assistance is sincerely appreciated. Companion Animals—Yvonne Bellay, DVM, MS; Allan Drusys, DVM, MVPHMgt; William Folger, DVM, MS, DABVP; Stephanie Janeczko, DVM, MS, DABVP, CAWA; Ellie Karlsson, DVM, DACLAM; Michael R.