Manukau, Papakura and Franklin Archives
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
PRESENT and FUTURE TRENDS 2.1 the Form of the City I 2.2 Growth of the City 2.3 the Existing Population
I I I PART 2 THE CITY: PRESENT AND FUTURE TRENDS 2.1 The Form of the City I 2.2 Growth of the City 2.3 The Existing Population I 2.4 Future Population Growth I 2.5 Employment 2.6 Building Development and Demand I 2.7 Energy Conservation and Land Use 2.8 Rural Land Use I 2.9 Future Urban Growth I 2.10 Land presently zoned for Urban Uses I I I I I I I I I I I I I PART 2 THE CITY: PRESENT AND FUTURE TRENDS I I 2.1 THE FORM OF THE CITY Manukau City had a population in March 1981 of 159,362. Its land area of over 600 square kilometres dominates the southern part of the Auckland Region. I The territorial integrity of the district, which stretches from the edge of the Auckland isthmus in the north to the Hunua ranges in the South, is interrupted only by the local authority enclaves of Papatoetoe City and 0tahuhu and Howick I Boroughs. The Manukau City Centre, 25 km south of Auckland Centre, is the natural geographical focus of the city's urban area . When fully developed the urban area I will stretch out from the Centre southwards to Manurewa and Takanini, northeastwards to Otara and Pakuranga and northwest to Mangere. Two-thirds of the City's land area is in rural use, ranging from dairy and town milk supply I units to pastoral farming, horticulture and forestry . A distinctive feature of the district is its extensive coastline of 320 km. -
Unitary Plan Summary of Decisions Requested Report
Reader’s guide To the Proposed Auckland Unitary Plan Summary of Decisions Requested report As with all regional and district plan reviews and plan changes, the Resource Management Act (RMA) requires the council to prepare a report summarising all the decisions requested. The report for the Proposed Auckland Unitary Plan (PAUP) will be the largest of its kind since the RMA came into effect in 1991, containing more than 93,600 individual requests from more than 9,400 submissions. The information below outlines how the submissions were summarised and provides guidance on how to navigate the Summary of Decisions Requested (SDR) report which is available online at www.aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/unitaryplan and in hard copy at selected Auckland Council Libraries, service centres and local board offices. 1. Content of the summary of decisions requested report The report is made up of concise summaries of the decisions requested in submissions. The report is not intended to be a summary of the submissions in their entirety and does not include reasons for the request or other supporting material included in the submissions. The original submission should be referred to if you are seeking to make a further submission, or to fully understand the issues raised by a submitter. A number of submissions discuss provisions of the PAUP or other information without providing specific references. No attempt has been made to source these references, or obtain clarification. Any clarification needed should be sourced directly from the submitter. In some cases, the decisions requested by submitters were unclear. Any inferences made are identified by the use of square brackets. -
Waikato 2070
WAIKATO 2070 WAIKATO DISTRICT COUNCIL Growth & Economic Development Strategy 2 3 Waikato 2070 Waikato WELCOME TO THE WAIKATO DISTRICT CONTENTS The Waikato District Council Growth & Economic Development Strategy WAIKATO DISTRICT COUNCIL: GROWTH & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY DISTRICT GROWTH DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL: & ECONOMIC WAIKATO (Waikato 2070) has been developed to provide guidance on appropriate 01.0 Introduction 4 growth and economic development that will support the wellbeing of the district. 02.0 Our Opportunities 13 This document has been prepared using the Special Consultative Procedure, Section 83, of the Local Government Act (2002). 03.0 Focus Areas 19 WHAT IS THE GROWTH STRATEGY? 04.0 Our Towns 25 A guiding document that the Waikato District Council uses to inform how, where and when growth occurs in the district over the next 50-years. The growth indicated in Waikato 2070 has been informed by in-depth analysis 05.0 Implementation 43 and combines economic, community and environmental objectives to create liveable, thriving and connected communities. The growth direction within Waikato 2070 will ultimately inform long-term planning and therefore affect 06.0 Glossary 46 social, cultural, economic and environmental wellbeing. WHAT DOES IT COVER? The strategy takes a broad and inclusive approach to growth over the long term, taking into account its economic, social, environmental, cultural and physical dimensions. Waikato 2070 is concerned with the growth and development of communities throughout the district, including rural and urban environments. Adopted by Waikato District Council 19 May 2020. VERSION: 16062020 REGION WIDE Transport connections side/collector main/arterial highway (state highways, arterials, rail) Future mass-transit stations rail and station short-term medium/long-term (and connections into Auckland, Hamilton, Waipa) Industrial Clusters Creative Ind. -
Meet Your Franklin Local Board Candidates P4-5
6 September 2019 Issue 1317 Stephanie McLean –Harcourts Pohutukawa Coast Stephanie Mclean Licensed Agent REAA 2008. Election Sales &Marketing Specialist M 021 164 5111 Hoverd&Co. SPeCIAL special AGENTs IAN 0272859314 JENNY02040002564 Meet your NICOLETTE0277029157 Franklin Local Board candidates TING 40 p4-5 RA Y B T E E OR ON A R L MTIMBER E CO.LTD S C 292 8656 • • 19 9 79 – 201 Morton Timber Co. Ltd 226 NorthRoad, Clevedon2248 Ph 292 8656 or 021943 220 Email: [email protected] Web: www.mortontimber.co.nz Like us on Facebook to go in the draw to WIN a$150 voucher fordinneratyour INSIDE: AT proposes road repairs p2 Urban East feature p6-7 Sports news p10-11 favouritelocal restaurant GetaJumponthe Spring Market... Call EliseObern Great Smiles. P:(09) 536 7011 or (021) 182 5939 Better Health. E:[email protected] W: rwbeachlands.co.nz At Anthony Hunt Dental we have been A:81Second View Avenue, Beachlands East Tamaki proud to be serving our local community since 2011. Creating great smiles and FREE PROPERTY APPRAISAL AND better health for the whole family. MARKET UPDATE AVAILABLE NOW! Uniforms&Promotional Products FollowusonFacebook andInstagram Ray White Beachlands (09) 292 9071 [email protected] Lighthouse Real Estate Limited for specials, competitionsand giveaways 52 Papakura-Clevedon Road Licensed (REAA 2008) Cnr Smales and Springs Rds,EastTamaki-09 265 0300 www.ahdental.co.nz DEADLINES: Display advertising - 5pm Friday. Classifieds and News - midday Monday Ph: 536 5715 Email: [email protected] www.pctimes.nz 2 POHUTUKAWA COAST TIMES (6 September 2019) Guest editorial by Orere Community and Boating Association committee member Tim Greene GET IN TOUCH P: 536 5715 The last few years has seen the resi- scheme. -
Ōtara-Papatoetoe Area Plan December 2014 TABLE of CONTENTS TATAI KORERO
BC3685 THE OTARA-PAPATOETOE REA PLA MAHERE A ROHE O OTARA-PAPATOETOE DECEMBER 2014 HE MIHI Tēnā kia hoea e au taku waka mā ngā tai mihi o ata e uru ake ai au mā te awa o Tāmaki ki te ūnga o Tainui waka i Ōtāhuhu. I reira ka toia aku mihi ki te uru ki te Pūkaki-Tapu-a-Poutūkeka, i reira ko te Pā i Māngere. E hoe aku mihi mā te Mānukanuka a Hoturoa ki te kūrae o te Kūiti o Āwhitu. I kona ka rere taku haere mā te ākau ki te puaha o Waikato, te awa tukukiri o ngā tūpuna, Waikato Taniwharau, he piko he taniwha. Ka hīkoi anō aku mihi mā te taha whakararo mā Maioro ki Waiuku ki Mātukureira kei kona ko ngā Pā o Tahuna me Reretewhioi. Ka aro whakarunga au kia tau atu ki Pukekohe. Ka tahuri te haere a taku reo ki te ao o te tonga e whāriki atu rā mā runga i ngā hiwi, kia taka atu au ki Te Paina, ki te Pou o Mangatāwhiri. Mātika tonu aku mihi ki a koe Kaiaua te whākana atu rā ō whatu mā Tīkapa Moana ki te maunga tapu o Moehau. Ka kauhoetia e aku kōrero te moana ki Maraetai kia hoki ake au ki uta ki Ōhuiarangi, heteri mō Pakuranga. I reira ka hoki whakaroto ake anō au i te awa o Tāmaki ma te taha whakarunga ki te Puke o Taramainuku, kei konā ko Ōtara. Kātahi au ka toro atu ki te Manurewa a Tamapohore, kia whakatau aku mihi mutunga ki runga o Pukekiwiriki kei raro ko Papakura ki konā au ka whakatau. -
High Intensity Rainfall Design System Version 4
High Intensity Rainfall Design System Version 4 Prepared for Envirolink August 2018 Prepared by: Trevor Carey-Smith Roddy Henderson Shailesh Singh For any information regarding this report please contact: Trevor Carey-Smith Climate Scientist Climate Dynamics +64-4-386 0394 [email protected] National Institute of Water & Atmospheric Research Ltd Private Bag 14901 Kilbirnie Wellington 6241 Phone +64 4 386 0300 NIWA CLIENT REPORT No: 2018022CH Report date: August 2018 NIWA Project: ELF16250 Quality Assurance Statement Charles Pearson, National Manager, Reviewed by: Environmental Information Operations Formatting checked by: Fenella Falconer, Office Administrator Dr Sam Dean, Chief Scientist for Approved for release by: Climate, Atmosphere and Hazards Cover Image: Rainfall depths for 10-minute, 2-hour and 5-day duration events, all with recurrence intervals of 100 years. © All rights reserved. This publication may not be reproduced or copied in any form without the permission of the copyright owner(s). Such permission is only to be given in accordance with the terms of the client’s contract with NIWA. This copyright extends to all forms of copying and any storage of material in any kind of information retrieval system. Whilst NIWA has used all reasonable endeavours to ensure that the information contained in this document is accurate, NIWA does not give any express or implied warranty as to the completeness of the information contained herein, or that it will be suitable for any purpose(s) other than those specifically contemplated during the Project or agreed by NIWA and the Client. Contents Executive summary ............................................................................................................. 8 1 Introduction .............................................................................................................. 9 2 Data ....................................................................................................................... -
Pdf Appendix 2.6O Tuakau Structure Built Heritage Assessment Part 2
Assessment of Effects Strengths Tuakau and the surrounding district have an interesting and diverse history, which connects with national stories, such as those of the 1860s Waikato War and the development of the railways. The history of the area also reflects the contributions made by individuals and families who helped to develop the district through their farming, light industrial, civic, religious and social activities. The Tuakau and Districts Museum is a community asset that can provide a focus for ongoing heritage research, identification and promotion activities. The Waikato District Heritage Strategy identifies the value of historic heritage resources to the community and provides a framework for a coherent and comprehensive approach to the identification, protection and management of these resources. Weaknesses There is currently very limited protection for built heritage resources provided for in the Waikato District Plan (Franklin Section). Rules pertaining to scheduled heritage items are not immediately accessible within either of the District Plans that Waikato Council presently has responsibility for. Opportunities In addition to acknowledging the history of the town and its hinterland, the Structure Plan provides the opportunity, by means of the public notification, hearing and implementation process, to raise the profile of Tuakau’s heritage values. Urban design strategies developed for the Structure Plan area can take account of Tuakau’s historical genesis and consider planning, design and planting actions that acknowledge the history of the area. Threats Loss of built heritage items may result from intensification should a future planning framework fail to provide for the protection of listed items and their surroundings. Extensive residential development could erode the separate identities of Tuakau and Harrisville, whose boundaries are already confused somewhat by the ‘Welcome to Tuakau’ sign that greets motorists as they approach the Harrisville School from the north. -
Before the Auckland Unitary Plan Independent Hearing Panel
BEFORE THE AUCKLAND UNITARY PLAN INDEPENDENT HEARING PANEL IN THE MATTER of the Resource Management Act 1991 anD the Local Government (AucklanD TransItIonal ProvIsIons) Act 2010 AND IN THE MATTER of Topic 017 RUB South AND IN THE MATTER of the submIssions set out In the PartIes anD Issues Report ________________________________________________________________ JOINT STATEMENT OF EVIDENCE OF COLIN EDWARD GEARY MACARTHUR AND DAVID JOHN ROBERT SMITH ON BEHALF OF BOB DEMLER 16 NOVEMBER 2015 ________________________________________________________________ Page 1 of 30 1 SUMMARY 1.1 This Is a joint statement of evIdence prepared by ColIn MacArthur and Dave SmIth of Abley TransportatIon Consultants LImIted (Abley) who have been asked to evaluate the development and consequences of selectIng the Southern RUB for inclusion in the Preliminary AucklanD Unitary Plan, specIfIcally to determIne at a high level, If these processes are suffIcIently robust enough to Demonstrate the outcome represents an effIcIent anD effectIve use of lanD. 1.2 Our analysIs IDentIfIes a number of short comIngs In terms of thoroughness of the evaluation process anD consIDeration of alternative RUB areas that may offer more effIcIent land use than the current proposed Southern RUB. The analysIs demonstrates that greenfIeld development partIcularly in the vicinity of Pukekohe will result in greater adverse Impacts across the AucklanD transport network than alternatIve sites, resulting in less than optimal lanD use anD transportation integration. 1.3 These greater effects wIll necessitate signIfIcant transportatIon infrastructure investment to accommoDate the likely growth in traffic assocIated wIth Pukekohe. At present, these Investments are not planned or funded. 1.4 We concluDe that there remaIns an inaDequate Demonstration of a comprehensive assessment of all viable areas or total construction anD servicing costs, either through the applIcatIon of transportatIon moDellIng or DerIveD from a fIrst prIncIples approach. -
Constructing the Other News Media Representations of a Predominantly ‘Brown’ Community in New Zealand
CLIMATE CHANGE IN ASIA-PACIFIC Constructing the Other News media representations of a predominantly ‘brown’ community in New Zealand Abstract: Research worldwide finds that indigenous, non-white, immigrant and other marginalised communities are subjected to media coverage that negatively and narrowly stereotypes them in comparison to dominant racial groups. In this article, we explore media representations of a predominantly Pacific and lower socio-economic community in New Zealand. The results contribute to the literature regarding media coverage of minority communities through an analysis of 388 news articles, drawing on Freire’s (1996/1970) theory of antidialogical action to consider how power is used to marginalise the predominantly Pacific community of South Auckland. The results dem- onstrate that South Aucklanders are subjected to stereotypes and negative labelling that reinforce their marginalisation and exclusion from mainstream New Zealand culture. Keywords: ethnicity, marginalisation, news media, New Zealand, Pacific peoples, Pākehā, representation JEAN M ALLEN and TONI BRUCE University of Auckland Introduction N THIS article, we explore media representations of a predominantly Pacific1 and lower socio-economic community in New Zealand, through the lens of IPaulo Freire’s theory of antidialogical action. For Freire (1970/1996), the pow- er imbalance between what he describes as the haves and have-nots is a form of oppressive action that permits domination over, or prejudicial treatment of, one group or individual by another. In Freire’s (1970/1996) conceptualisation of power as primarily oppressive, power imbalances are maintained through antidialogical action, which limits dialogue between the empowered and the marginalised and hinders the ability of marginalised groups to recognise or gain consciousness of their oppression. -
2009/2019 Ten Year Plan
2009/2019 Ten Year Plan 88 2009/2019 Ten Year Plan The Manukau Family COUNCIL CONTROLLED ORGANISATIONS To help achieve the Tomorrow’s Some CCOs are council-controlled Manukau community outcomes, some trading organisations (CCTO) which of our services and activities are operate to make a profit. Each CCO is provided through trusts and other required to agree a Statement of Intent organisations. Where necessary, the (SOI) with the council each year. The council provides funding or part of the SOI sets out the CCOs nature and scope funding for these organisations, which of activities, key performance targets, independently manage the facilities or and reporting requirements along with services they’re set up to provide for other matters. Manukau’s communities. The council can exempt small CCOs A council-controlled organisation (CCO) from the reporting requirements that is a company or organisation in which are otherwise required. CCOs that the a council or councils hold 50 per cent council currently exempts are: or more of the voting rights or can • Arts Regional Trust appoint 50 per cent or more of the • Mangere Mountain Education Trust. trustees, directors or managers. Manukau City Council The Manukau Family 2009/2019 Ten Year Plan 1 Manukau Water Limited Why does it exist? tree roots. These blockages result in wastewater escaping from the pipes into the environment. Activities within plumbing inside The council provides water and wastewater services to the city’s properties have the potential to pollute the public drinking water. residents and businesses, through Manukau Water, which was set There are also potential visual and noise impacts of the operation up as a CCO on 1 July 2006. -
South & East Auckland Auckland Airport
G A p R D D Paremoremo O N R Sunnynook Course EM Y P R 18 U ParemoremoA O H N R D E M Schnapper Rock W S Y W R D O L R SUNSET RD E R L ABERDEEN T I A Castor Bay H H TARGE SUNNYNOOK S Unsworth T T T S Forrest C Heights E O South & East Auckland R G Hill R L Totara Vale R D E A D R 1 R N AIRA O S Matapihi Point F W F U I T Motutapu E U R RD Stony Batter D L Milford Waitemata THE R B O D Island Thompsons Point Historic HI D EN AR KITCHENER RD Waihihi Harbour RE H Hakaimango Point Reserve G Greenhithe R R TRISTRAM Bayview D Kauri Point TAUHINU E Wairau P Korakorahi Point P DIANA DR Valley U IPATIKI CHIVALRY RD HILLSIDERD 1 A R CHARTWELL NZAF Herald K D Lake Takapuna SUNNYBRAE RD SHAKESPEARE RD ase RNZAF T Pupuke t Island 18 Glenfield AVE Takapuna A Auckland nle H Takapuna OCEAN VIEW RD kland a I Golf Course A hi R Beach Golf Course ro O ia PT T a E O Holiday Palm Beach L R HURSTMERE RD W IL D Park D V BEACH HAVEN RD NORTHCOTE R N Beach ARCHERS RD Rangitoto B S P I O B E K A S D A O Island Haven I RD R B R A I R K O L N U R CORONATION RD O E Blackpool H E Hillcrest R D A A K R T N Church Bay Y O B A SM K N D E N R S Birkdale I R G Surfdale MAN O’WAR BAY RD Hobsonville G A D R North Shore A D L K A D E Rangitawhiri Point D E Holiday Park LAK T R R N OCEANRALEIGH VIEW RD I R H E A R E PUPUKE Northcote Hauraki A 18 Y D EXMOUTH RD 2 E Scott Pt D RD L R JUTLAND RD E D A E ORAPIU RD RD S Birkenhead V I W K D E A Belmont W R A L R Hauraki Gulf I MOKO ONEWA R P IA RD D D Waitemata A HINEMOA ST Waiheke LLE RK Taniwhanui Point W PA West Harbour OLD LAKE Golf Course Pakatoa Point L E ST Chatswood BAYSWATER VAUXHALL RD U 1 Harbour QUEEN ST Bayswater RD Narrow C D Motuihe KE NS R Luckens Point Waitemata Neck Island AWAROA RD Chelsea Bay Golf Course Park Point Omiha Motorway . -
A Study of Transience in South Auckland Primary Schools
A STUDY OF STUDENT TRANSIENCE IN SOUTH AUCKLAND PRIMARY SCHOOLS 1 Introduction: Reports by primary schools teachers and principals talk of the frustration of attempting to educate children who are constantly changing schools2. Anecdotal information from teaching professionals reports that this transience has become worse during the 1990s. Many believe it is linked to the shift to market-related rents in 1993, and the rapidly increased rents that followed this change. These policy changes have made the housing position of many families vulnerable and tenuous, leading to frequent shifts between houses as they attempt to manage high rents and household debts. Reports from budgeting agencies suggest that many families move between renting their own home and sharing one with their extended family, with the high financial cost of renting and the high personal cost of sharing being continuously traded off. Child Poverty Action Group (Inc) is a not-for-profit group of practitioners, activists and academics who advocate for more informed social policy to support children in Aotearoa New Zealand. CPAG is particularly interested in the plight of the one third of New Zealand children who presently live in relative, and occasionally, absolute poverty. CPAG believes that this situation is not the result of economic necessity but due to policy neglect. Through efforts in research and advocacy, CPAG hopes to highlight the unfortunate position of tens of thousands of New Zealand children, and promote public policies that address the underlying causes of much of this poverty. CPAG believes that every child is part of a family/whanau and that one of the best ways to support family/whanau to nurture their children is to ensure that everyone has access to decent, affordable and appropriate housing.